Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Rancour (2019)
8/10
Yummy Practical Effects Meet House-as-Body Horror
3 July 2024
Dane Hallett's 'Rancour' (2019) concerns a junky named Dale whose mom pays a visit to his dilapidated pit of despair. Things get sloppy wet ... with tentacles. Full vid on @watch_alter on YouTube!

The short conflates Dale's house with his body, which is overrun by a gruesome alien force that takes takes takes in order to feed its ravenous hunger. We usually get the house-as-body trope with haunted house flicks where different rooms represent different parts of the mind. Less frequently do we see it used in service of body horror ('Girl on the Third Floor' springs to mind, but not much else). The concept works well with this material since addiction is a slimy gross business (both literally with all the needles and bodily fluids and breaking down of the body, and figuratively with all the damage it causes to self and loved ones).

Bottom Line: It's a good short that deserves more than its current rating.

Additional Fun Facts: Odd Studio who did the creature FX for 'Alien: Covenant' (which Hallett also worked on) helped with the creature FX for this short. It won awards at both FilmQuest and Hollywood Horrorfest. 95% of the effects are practical, with some light vfx touchups but nothing major. Travis Jeffrey who plays Dale is featured in Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes so make sure to check that as well.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gaia (2021)
7/10
Mushroom Apocalypse & The One-ness of Being
1 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Just watched Gaia a couple nights back. Overall, I liked it. The film belongs to an important sub-genre that I hope more directors play with: environmental horror. Jaco Bouwer - the director of Gaia - is definitely talented. He delivers some pretty heavy statements about the abusive relationship between humanity and Nature, and the paradox of Nature appearing distinctly alive in the face of climate change. But he manages to do this in a fun and entertaining way, without talking over our heads or berating us with his ideas. Most importantly, he doesn't assign blame to any single party in the film. Everyone takes their turn as monster in a world where Nature and human society are inextricably intertwined. Pointing fingers is just a distraction from dealing with the problems at hand.

What are the problems? Overpopulation, pollution, rampant consumption of resources. In response to these issues, Nature develops a biophysical defense mechanism that infests humans and turns them into the Nature they are destroying. To better understand what is happening, the characters of the film take mushrooms to tap into the mind of Gaia, the 'global brain.' One character becomes obsessed with the technology of revelation (the mushroom) and starts worshipping it. His idolatry and addiction soon leads him to sacrifice his only living son so that he can continue being favored by the mushroom, and spared the fate of becoming the mushroom. If that sounds complicated, it's because it is. But don't worry - Gaia is fun to watch with some amazing creature design and effects. I recommend.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nobody (I) (2021)
8/10
Absurd, Wry, Pulpy B-Movie Extravaganza Of Ultra-Violence
15 June 2021
I was first introduced to Bob Odenkirk when "Mr. Show" launched on HBO back in the mid-90s. At the time, I thought the sketch comedy program was hit or miss - a first impression that made me ambivalent about Odenkirk until his debut as smarmy lawyer Saul Goodman on Breaking Bad. He's so damn good at playing the immature, impetuous criminal lawyer who wants to do good yet consistently does bad when faced with the alluring freedom attached to criminal behavior. My perception of Odenkirk and his acting abilities was seriously starting to shift. Still, I wondered how much of Saul was just Odenkirk in assorted garish, custom-made suits. I didn't know if he could bring the same brilliance to a different character. The last character I expected him to pull from his bag of tricks was the lead badass in a balls-to-the-wall, shoot-em-up action flick. So when I learned about "Nobody," I had major reservations. I imagine my reaction was similar to the way audiences first responded to seeing Bruce Willis in ads for 'Die Hard.' Kind of a 'yeah right, there's no way this aging comedian can pull this off' type of vibe.

Well, I've seen it. And Odenkirk has made me a believer. Even though it was surreal to see him playing a bone-crushing, Uzi-toting, grenade-tossing one-man army, I bought the performance and really enjoyed it. There's nothing particularly new about the storyline - a normcore suburban dad named Hutch Mansell (with a mysterious past à la John Wick) intentionally avoids getting violent during a home-invasion robbery. Afterwards, he gets grief for acting like a wussy from his family and pretty much everyone on the face on the planet. This unlocks his inner beast who goes on a rage-fueled bender of finely-choreographed mayhem that quickly involves the entire Russian mafia. It's an absurd, wry, pulpy b-movie extravaganza of ultra-violence that works thanks to Odenkirk's complete commitment. Definitely worth checking out.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
How The Average Teen Turns Into A Killer & Social Pariah
15 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Peter Jackson's "Heavenly Creatures" is one of my favorite queer horror films. Based on true events, the movie concerns a murder carried out by two young girls (ages 15 and 16) who used a rock to crush the skull of one of their mothers. The girls served 5 years in prison before getting paroled - under the condition that they never meet again. The Parker Hulme Case is well known in New Zealand, occupying a prominent place in the nation's history of notorious crimes.

Jackson decided to dramatize the story because he felt it was gravely misunderstood. When the murder happened back in 1952, criminal psychology was still a primitive science in New Zealand. Lacking a rational explanation for the girls' actions, the media branded them as evil, lesbian psychopaths - a stigma that endured for decades. Jackson's film discredits that stigma, portraying the girls as two young outsiders, both highly intelligent with active imaginations, who lean on each other to cope with unhappy realities in their lives (clueless parents, tyrannical teachers, stifling social norms). The girls share a powerful bond, punctuated by long embraces and awkward kisses. Whether that bond is sexual or platonic in nature should be nobody's business. Unfortunately, it was a different time. Young women who engaged in socially unacceptable sexual activities - including lesbian practices - could be punished (e.g. Lesbians were sometimes sent to psych hospitals for frontal lobe surgery, which essentially turned them into vegetables and destroyed their lives). Disturbed by their closeness, the girls' parents decided to separate them for "their own good." Only then, when faced with the terrifying prospect of losing each other, did the girls plan and commit murder.

This movie really moved me. Perhaps because I see so much of myself in its lead characters. I was a loner and a dreamer, and I was bullied for being gay. Still, my situation wasn't so bad. I had a supportive family and small circle of friends. Plus, prevailing attitudes about homosexuality were much more accepting than what existed in the 50s. If I'd been born in a different time, and subjected to the right mix of circumstances, I'm sure what happened to these women could've happened to me.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trilogy of Terror (1975 TV Movie)
7/10
They saved the best for last ...
20 May 2021
Karen Black is everything. I could look at her face for hours and never get tired of it. She's stunning. She's got a unique energy that makes me buy every role she plays. Plus, there's something... idk... mesmerizing yet terrifying about her. Bottom Line: I love this lady. So 'Trilogy of Terror' - a 3-part horror anthology where Karen plays 4 leading roles ... it's pure manna-from-heaven for me.

When 'Trilogy' first aired as an ABC Movie of the Week back in 1975, Karen wasn't a horror queen. She only had one horror movie under her belt: 'The Pyx' aka 'The Hooker Cult Murders' (1975). In fact, Karen initially turned down 'Trilogy.' It wasn't until her then-husband (Robert Burton) was cast that she decided to reconsider. The movie received mostly positive reviews, largely because of the last story about a young woman who is terrorized by a Zuni hunting fetish in her New York apartment (a pretty swank one too). The last story packs the biggest punch. The camera work is more creative. The music is more lively. The sound effects of the doll chattering and scampering about the apartment help to ramp up the tension. It's the only story with a script by Richard Matheson. Plus, Karen contributed plenty of ideas and dialogue-rewrites.

The success of the movie may have had an unintended effect on Karen's career. She felt it led to genre typecasting, forcing her to take roles in B-grade horror films. She said it put her career on a path where it didn't belong. Personally, I'm grateful for her work in horror - especially her role as Mother Firefly in Rob Zombie's 'House of 1000 Corpses.' Iconic.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Classic Equal-Offender Horror-Comedy That Built Troma
20 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Heavy doses of crass humor. A dash of C-grade gore-effects. One or two pairs of boobs. And a smattering of comic books references. That my friends is the recipe for Toxic Avenger.

Shot in New Jersey for a meager $500K by Lloyd Kaufman and Michael Herz, the Toxic Avenger series has earned millions for the founders of Troma since its premiere in 1984. All but ignored at first, the film slowly developed a cult following after an extended run of midnight showings at the Bleeker Street Theater in NYC. This, coupled with regular cable broadcasts and several home video releases, is how Toxic Avenger became the movie that introduced Troma to the world. Its profits have generated three sequels (really two since the first sequel was so long it got cut in half and released as two separate films), a children's Saturday morning cartoon (Toxic Crusaders, made possible by the success of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles which helped mutants go mainstream), a straight-to-video feature using edited content from the cartoon, two independent stage musicals as well as an off-Broadway adaptation (that won numerous awards from reputable critics), and a mountain of merchandise including comic books, action figures, books, and video games. And now there are rumblings of a reboot from Legendary, directed by Macon Blair (Blue Ruin, Green Room) and starring Peter Dinklage as our beloved paladin of putrescence. And it's all thanks to a campy little low-budget horror-comedy with ties to Marvel Comics.

For those of you who haven't seen it (and what are you waiting for???), The Toxic Avenger is about an unsympathetic spaz named Melvin Junko (aka Melvin Ferd) who mops up after elitist, sadomasochistic jocks at a health club in Tromaville aka the "toxic waste dumping capital of the world" aka New Jersey. After Melvin accidentally dumps some slop water on the jocks, they get revenge by playing a prank (involving a tutu and a sheep) that goes awry and sends Melvin tumbling into a vat of radioactive sludge. After much melting and burning, Melvin develops super-human strength and becomes a local hero and protector of the downtrodden and victimized.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Parents (1989)
8/10
Left-overs from what?
18 May 2021
I've loved 'Parents' since I was a kid. I remember setting an alarm to wake up at 3am so I could watch the movie on HBO without drawing my parents' attention. Not that I was 100% certain they would shut it down. I just didn't want to take any chances. A wise decision.

Because 'Parents' is a movie that speaks directly to kids and the terrifying monsters that lurk in their fertile imaginations. I still get chills from some of the psycho-crazy-nightmare-visions whipped up by my kid brain. For example, I once had a dream (at age 6 or 7) where I was being chased around a cabin by my father who was wearing a crusty old Santa costume and wielding a giant kitchen knife. At the end of the dream, I make it to the kitchen where my mom is standing at the stove, heating a saucepan. I scream to her: "Mom! Dad has gone crazy! He's dressed as Santa and trying to kill me!" She turns, slowly revealing a silky, sinister smirk, and says: "I know, sweetheart. What do you think we're having for dinner?" And then I jolted awake. WTF!!! This was before 'Parents' so I've missed at least one opportunity to turn my mental mayhem into material for a cult classic. Alas I keep trying to tap into that font of hellish visions that flowed so freely when I was a kid. But I digress ...

'Parents' is the story of a similarly young, bizarre, and imaginative boy named Michael. He suspects something rotten beneath the surface of his picture-perfect suburban life in 1950s Eisenhower America (the perfect socio-political & aesthetic context for such a tale). Specifically, Michael questions his family's diet: an endless parade of mystery-meat slabs dancing across their dinner plates each evening. His mom calls them "left-overs," but left-overs from what? When Michael's worst suspicions are soon confirmed, he's faced with a decision far scarier than his most chilling nightmares (and this boy has some doozies!). Be part of the family and eat your friends, or be eaten by the people who are supposed to love you most.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
4 parts small-town drama, 1 part alien abduction (but its really good)
18 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Finally watched "Fire In The Sky" - the 1993 film about the alleged alien abduction of Travis Walton. On 11-5-1975, Walton was working on a 7-man logging crew in Arizona. At dusk, the men were leaving the forest in a pickup when they encountered a "mind-blowing" golden glow emanating from a disc-shaped UFO hovering over a clearing. Walton left the truck and approached the object, which made a high-pitched buzzing sound. After ducking behind a log to watch the object from a distance, Walton was struck by an energy discharge that sent him reeling and left him unconscious. His coworkers fled the scene. When they returned for him later, Walton was gone. The men reported the incident to the police who initially suspected them of murder. The cops soon decided the whole thing was a hoax, assuming Walton would show up in a few days.

Walton claims he woke up in a strange ship on a table surrounded by aliens. They were hairless, bug-eyed, expressionless, and mute. Walton panicked & started attacking them, punching and throwing beakers to keep them at bay. The aliens retreated, and a strong, long-haired humanoid male approached. He moved Walton to a different structure, plopping him on another table where a female humanoid placed a mask over his face that knocked him out. When Walton woke up on November 11, he was in the woods 30 miles from his abduction site. He walked to a phone booth and called his sister. Although his experience was harrowing, Walton doesn't think the aliens were malicious.

"Fire In The Sky" sticks to Walton's story for the most part. The omission of humanoids was demanded by anxious execs who felt aliens-in-human-suits was a hackneyed concept. We love the changes. They make the abduction as disturbing & shocking as possible. But you've gotta be patient to get to it. Walton's story is pretty sparse so the filmmakers pad it out with small-town melodrama that happens in his absence. The bulk of the movie focuses on Walton's coworkers who stick to their story in the face of widespread disbelief. It's not great, but not bad either. And the payoff is worth it. The abduction scene is phenomenal w/ jaw-dropping practical effects by ILM.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wrong Turn (2021)
8/10
Don't Judge A Book By Its Animal Skins
18 May 2021
Watched the 2021 reboot of "Wrong Turn." Gotta say, I like it - which is surprising since I'm not a big fan of the original or its brood of direct-to-video children.

The first film follows a group of carefree, young, and attractive kids who are hunted by inbred mutant cannibals in West Virginia. In true teen-slasher fashion, the sin-factor determines the order of slayings with the horny weed-smokers getting knocked off first. The flick has a couple decent scares, but is mostly an excuse to watch people get hacked to bits by hicks. And that's fine. I have my blood-and-guts days.

This new flick elevates the story from slasher to cult horror. Gone are the inbred cannibals and simplistic predator-pray dynamics, replaced by an intentional society of forest-dwelling Democratic socialists aka "The Foundation." Camouflaged in copious amounts of animal skins/skulls and moss, the Foundation has lived as a secluded civilization in the Appalachian Mountains since the 1800s ... and they don't take kindly to strangers. In fact, they've laid an impressive assortment of booby traps across the mountain to capture/kill trespassing outsiders (everything from massive rolling logs, to tiger pits lined with punji sticks and venomous snakes, to spiked maces and sharpened rock slabs that drop from the tree canopy). The traps make for some head-smashing good fun, while establishing an ever-present sense of anxiety. This is bolstered by the director's clever use of a muted color palette, which directs our attention to small details in the woods (like trees with eyeballs) that suggest our hipster interlopers are under constant surveillance by an unseen, nearby presence.

What's interesting about this flick is it doesn't have a clear-cut bad guy/girl. Everybody (the kids, small-town locals, Foundation members) is painted as flawed with redeeming qualities. While this approach doesn't stand up to serious scrutiny, it still makes for an interesting movie-going experience that leaves you with a simple yet important message: Don't judge a book by its animal skins.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not great, but a touchtone of self-referential horror.
18 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"Return to Horror High" is a low-budget 80s whodunit meta-slasher about the production of a low-budget whodunit slasher. While this flick has issues (like a non-linear narrative that can be downright difficult to follow), we appreciate that it tries to be different by poking fun at the clichés of the slasher genre (gratuitous nudity, using buckets of blood to compensate for a lack of decent effects, actors leaving for bigger parts, actors playing multiple parts, using celebrities in bit parts and giving them top billing). Many people regard 'Return' as a touchstone of self-referential horror that paved the way for films like 'Behind the Mask,' 'Cabin in the Woods,' and 'Scream.' It's not great, but it's a decent bit of campy, goofy 80s-tastic horror. One of the kill scenes involves a Rube Goldberg death-machine (always a bonus in my eyes). And it gave us one of the most iconic horror posters of all time. I'm pretty sure everyone who was alive in the 80s remembers the skeleton cheerleader on the cover of this VHS box.

Oh, and you get to see George Clooney in his feature debut! He's an actor playing a cop in the movie-within-a-movie who leaves the production after getting hired for a bigger, better project. Sadly, his dreams of Hollywood stardom never come to fruition because he gets killed with a mop bucket.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tequila Worms, Vomit Monsters, and Astral Planes, Oh My!
18 May 2021
Watched "Poltergeist 2" last night. Hadn't seen it since ... I honestly don't remember it was so long ago. But I had a lot of fun revisiting it. It's not as good as the first - a problem that plagues most sequels unless directed by James Cameron. I could do without the religious overtones and Native American stereotyping. But other than that, there's plenty to like here.

First off, I like that it's more of a possession movie than a ghost movie - that a demon is trying to possess Carol Anne so it can break the family's spirit and ultimately destroy them. To be honest, I didn't even pick up on this thread when I was a kid. I just thought ... the ghosts are back. End of story. I don't know why Taylor's explanation, or the tequila-worm-possession didn't clue me in. Oh well.

I love the score by Jerry Goldsmith that continues material from the first film, while moving away from heavy orchestration towards a more synth-heavy sound with Native American elements. And his use of the 'God is in His holy temple' hymn is inspired. The monster designs by H. R. Giger (see last post) are among my faves from 80s horror films, specifically the Vomit Monster and "Great Beast" manifestation of Kane that appears in the astral plane. I know some folks fault how Giger's sketches were translated to the big screen - but I think they're pretty damn cool (thank you, Richard Edlund). And lastly, there are some excellent performances here. Julian Beck nails it as the malevolent reverend. He still gives me the heebie-jeebies. Will Sampson does a fine job as the mystical medicine man. I mean, I buy it. And I really REALLY enjoyed JoBeth Williams and Craig T. Nelson in their reprised roles as Diane and Steve Freeling. There are moments (again I go back to the tequila worm possession) when they are seriously acting their faces off.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed