Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews45
MovieGeekBlog's rating
I've been spotting some very scathing reviews around the internet about this one, but to be honest I don't really understand all the hate.
It might be because I'm still trying to recover that massive stinker that was "Moonfall" and I really needed some popcorn fun , or it might be because I'm beginning to grow a soft spot for little Tom Holland, or even because I've been craving for another Indiana Jones-like adventure for years, but I've actually quite enjoyed this one in a sort of unchallenging/turn-your-brain-off sort of way.
Of course, it's not going to set the world on fire, nor it's a game-changer, but it was a perfectly serviceable silly action-packed romp with couple of stand-out set pieces and which confirms Holland credentials as a likeable lead even outside his spider-suit.
It's also a film that never really takes itself too seriously, so why should we?
Serving as a prequel to the video games by the same name (in fact, geeky-nerd that I am, I seem to remember the third game had some flashbacks too), it follows Nathan Drake, a bartender, history buff, and occasional pickpocket, as he is recruited by Mark Wahlberg's character (Sully, also from the game) to search for the lost treasure across the world.
The game itself was a rip-off other other Intellectual Properties like Tomb Raider and of course Indiana Jones, so it's no surpise that the film too has constant echoes from those franchises: a sort of "Indy-light". In fact at some point one character even asks "When did you decide to become Indiana Jones? Proving that it knows exactly what it's doing.
It may lack the charm, panache and confidence of those early fantastic Spielberg's adventures, it is certainly better than any of the Tomb Raider films and it packs so much action that you'll hardy stop question any shortcomings. Of course if you are a fan of the games, you'll know it can do so much more
Holland has clearly biffed-up a lot for the role and it's a pleasure to see him doing a lot of his stunts. Hopefully in future instalments a more skilful director might be able to make more of his innate charm and bring a little bit more depth to the character and the story.
As a fan of the games, I know this franchise can do so much more.
It might be because I'm still trying to recover that massive stinker that was "Moonfall" and I really needed some popcorn fun , or it might be because I'm beginning to grow a soft spot for little Tom Holland, or even because I've been craving for another Indiana Jones-like adventure for years, but I've actually quite enjoyed this one in a sort of unchallenging/turn-your-brain-off sort of way.
Of course, it's not going to set the world on fire, nor it's a game-changer, but it was a perfectly serviceable silly action-packed romp with couple of stand-out set pieces and which confirms Holland credentials as a likeable lead even outside his spider-suit.
It's also a film that never really takes itself too seriously, so why should we?
Serving as a prequel to the video games by the same name (in fact, geeky-nerd that I am, I seem to remember the third game had some flashbacks too), it follows Nathan Drake, a bartender, history buff, and occasional pickpocket, as he is recruited by Mark Wahlberg's character (Sully, also from the game) to search for the lost treasure across the world.
The game itself was a rip-off other other Intellectual Properties like Tomb Raider and of course Indiana Jones, so it's no surpise that the film too has constant echoes from those franchises: a sort of "Indy-light". In fact at some point one character even asks "When did you decide to become Indiana Jones? Proving that it knows exactly what it's doing.
It may lack the charm, panache and confidence of those early fantastic Spielberg's adventures, it is certainly better than any of the Tomb Raider films and it packs so much action that you'll hardy stop question any shortcomings. Of course if you are a fan of the games, you'll know it can do so much more
Holland has clearly biffed-up a lot for the role and it's a pleasure to see him doing a lot of his stunts. Hopefully in future instalments a more skilful director might be able to make more of his innate charm and bring a little bit more depth to the character and the story.
As a fan of the games, I know this franchise can do so much more.
Find 30 minutes to watch this NOW!!
Nominated for Best short film at the Oscar this year, this wonderful little film uses the "old" Groundhog Day formula to great effect and does something which is not just completely new within a genre which never ceases to surprise me, but also manages to deliver one of the most important moral lessons and heartbreaking message.
It might not be subtle, but the circumstances are such that subtlety is meaningless at this point.
The names over the credits serve as a reminder of how much out of hands this has gone. Just as I am writing this the news of 20-year-old Daunte Wright was killed by a policeman who "accidentally discharged a "handgun".
Yes, it is the real groundhog day.
Beautiful, clever and very effective.
Nominated for Best short film at the Oscar this year, this wonderful little film uses the "old" Groundhog Day formula to great effect and does something which is not just completely new within a genre which never ceases to surprise me, but also manages to deliver one of the most important moral lessons and heartbreaking message.
It might not be subtle, but the circumstances are such that subtlety is meaningless at this point.
The names over the credits serve as a reminder of how much out of hands this has gone. Just as I am writing this the news of 20-year-old Daunte Wright was killed by a policeman who "accidentally discharged a "handgun".
Yes, it is the real groundhog day.
Beautiful, clever and very effective.
