UNOhwen
Joined Sep 2009
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews304
UNOhwen's rating
As I just said, there's a film called The Car (1980) about a driverless automobile (I'm not a car lover or even a driver, but still, the car in that film was custom-built for that film, and it was cool-looking) that terrorises a small isolated area in California, if I can remedy it right.
This one is filled with non-professionals who are behind the camera and skirt every single one in front of it.
Call me a 'snob' (I just said I saw and liked The Car, so I am not. A snob, that is), but I have A HUGE problem watching something SO written and acted.
None of these people have anything close to decent line readings.
Films aren't made in sequence; they're made in whatever order the director thinks is the best, most effective way to shoot them. When you've got scenes with more than one person (that's over 99.98%), you have to film scenes where the 'performer' is reacting to something that only makes sense when it's edited.
Sometimes, someone will read the (unseen) part of the actor being filmed to help give them something to actually 'feel' something.
Still, unless you've done it, it doesn't come naturally to most people, as practically all conversations are with someone else who's there.
There's one performer in this (all I can say is it's yet ANOTHER WAY over-bleached blonde - ugh. What is it about Southerners that they all want to look so trashy?) who's probably THE worst thing in this muck. I laughed hard at her deep, embryonic reading of 'My family's breaking into a million parts!'
It would probably be better if she went to her local takeaway place and placed her order.
This is yet another of the way-too-many piles of dreck used to fill airtime these days.
I wish someone with a brain would wake up and have a brain and say, 'people like to watch GOOD things, not garbage, so let's spend a little more for REAL folks who tell GOOD stories.'
This one is filled with non-professionals who are behind the camera and skirt every single one in front of it.
Call me a 'snob' (I just said I saw and liked The Car, so I am not. A snob, that is), but I have A HUGE problem watching something SO written and acted.
None of these people have anything close to decent line readings.
Films aren't made in sequence; they're made in whatever order the director thinks is the best, most effective way to shoot them. When you've got scenes with more than one person (that's over 99.98%), you have to film scenes where the 'performer' is reacting to something that only makes sense when it's edited.
Sometimes, someone will read the (unseen) part of the actor being filmed to help give them something to actually 'feel' something.
Still, unless you've done it, it doesn't come naturally to most people, as practically all conversations are with someone else who's there.
There's one performer in this (all I can say is it's yet ANOTHER WAY over-bleached blonde - ugh. What is it about Southerners that they all want to look so trashy?) who's probably THE worst thing in this muck. I laughed hard at her deep, embryonic reading of 'My family's breaking into a million parts!'
It would probably be better if she went to her local takeaway place and placed her order.
This is yet another of the way-too-many piles of dreck used to fill airtime these days.
I wish someone with a brain would wake up and have a brain and say, 'people like to watch GOOD things, not garbage, so let's spend a little more for REAL folks who tell GOOD stories.'
This trash heap of the VERY tired 'zombie' bs was made on a budget, starring NON-professionals, and (s someone who works in the REAL version of this 'let's make a film' business); I'm tired of all these NON-SAG/AFTRA people in front of the camera, asked NON-IATSE behind (what that means is NO ONE involved in this pile of dung has ANY connection with the film business).
The problem stems from the idiotic idea that the 'more (product...i.e., 'films'), the 'better'.
I'm not the only one who grew up (at the birth of cable) with limited channels, but I was thrilled to find an old classic film to watch.
Now, with streaming services up the wazzoo, they act like they need to fill a gazillion free channels, and the only way to do that - on the cheap - is to throw garbage like this in the air.
This dung pile has those typically nauseating opening credits (the king's one sees moorings on YouTube, who doesn't own it and has no legal right to put something on their channel). Yet, they make this big, pathetic opening logo, like your sweet in a genuine film.
So you see some amateur graphics; 'ACME Pictures presents nobody in a film worn by John Doe, produced by John Doe, directed by John Doe...and on, and on...
I only put it on because I was bored for a few minutes and wanted to chuckle.
Just as I thought, this is EXACTLY what I just said; it's some 'film' written by (their last name's) Clay brothers, produced by these identical Clay brothers, and directed by-guess-yes, one of the Clay brothers.
There's NO ONE you've EVER heard of in things like this. It's amateurs from hell. Even worse, EVERY modern American cliché (if you wonder where these 'conspiracies' come from, look no further).
This one goes something like this: an explosion at a(American) military base causes a chemical release of bio-weapons, and these 'bio-weapons' cause the people (always in some Southern state - yuck).
As someone with a brain who's neither stupid nor a citizen of the States, it's VERY sad how far the country's fallen (primarily because of these Southern yahoos) in the past 15-20 years.
So that you know, bioweapons are ILLEGAL (of course, the paranoid idiots who live in the States believe otherwise. I wish post-birth abortions were allowed).
The ONLY countries creating them are the same dangerous group we all know: N Korea, Russia, (formerly) Iraq, etc. Even better, places like Iraq build them illegally and use them as their citizens! Brilliant.
Not.
So, back to the dung; the first twenty minutes of this have virtually no dialogue. The viewer watches some guy with a woman (I'm guessing his girlfriend, etc) 'escaping' from this quarantined area. In our first scene with the hair couple, she promptly dies (bullet wound. He next saw her dragging her body to a horse barn (not begging from knowing about, not caring about the American South, it looks like A VERY well-off privately owned 'horsey hotel'. I'm gonna take a wild guess and say it's owned by the Clay brothers, mommy and daddy, and they're just two spoilt Southerners who are starving for attention and think they're film auteurs - they're not, but are too stupid to get two jobs, stop their folks foolishly spoil them-so touching.
Listen, there are many BETTER things one can do than watch stuff like this: paint a wall, read a book, go to the supermarket.
Anything but watching garbage like this.
Before I go, I just wanted to say how amusing it is (and I'm being VERY sarcastic) that this 'non-picture' has NOT one, but three entries into the 'plot' box in IMdB (I put a plot in parentheses because the dolts who write the things in those boxes DON'T know that a plot is NOT what it means when it CLEARLY says 'synopsis' on that box (a synopsis is JUST one, or, at most, two sentences which give A VERY brief overview of the film's main plotline. So instead of simply writing something like 'an explosion at a military base causes townsfolk nearby to turn into zombies', they think the longer, the better (BTW; whenever you see ANYTHING on ANY TV, the little box which tells you about what it is your watching - THAT'S the 'synopsis' box, and the reason SO MANY of these boxes are so filled they end with '...' - which must proper can't click on (their TV), is because of this very reason. One of THE WORST examples is some egotist who calls itself h-gg- I will not give it any more credit. Its main goal is to write novel-length things for EVERYthing.
The problem stems from the idiotic idea that the 'more (product...i.e., 'films'), the 'better'.
I'm not the only one who grew up (at the birth of cable) with limited channels, but I was thrilled to find an old classic film to watch.
Now, with streaming services up the wazzoo, they act like they need to fill a gazillion free channels, and the only way to do that - on the cheap - is to throw garbage like this in the air.
This dung pile has those typically nauseating opening credits (the king's one sees moorings on YouTube, who doesn't own it and has no legal right to put something on their channel). Yet, they make this big, pathetic opening logo, like your sweet in a genuine film.
So you see some amateur graphics; 'ACME Pictures presents nobody in a film worn by John Doe, produced by John Doe, directed by John Doe...and on, and on...
I only put it on because I was bored for a few minutes and wanted to chuckle.
Just as I thought, this is EXACTLY what I just said; it's some 'film' written by (their last name's) Clay brothers, produced by these identical Clay brothers, and directed by-guess-yes, one of the Clay brothers.
There's NO ONE you've EVER heard of in things like this. It's amateurs from hell. Even worse, EVERY modern American cliché (if you wonder where these 'conspiracies' come from, look no further).
This one goes something like this: an explosion at a(American) military base causes a chemical release of bio-weapons, and these 'bio-weapons' cause the people (always in some Southern state - yuck).
As someone with a brain who's neither stupid nor a citizen of the States, it's VERY sad how far the country's fallen (primarily because of these Southern yahoos) in the past 15-20 years.
So that you know, bioweapons are ILLEGAL (of course, the paranoid idiots who live in the States believe otherwise. I wish post-birth abortions were allowed).
The ONLY countries creating them are the same dangerous group we all know: N Korea, Russia, (formerly) Iraq, etc. Even better, places like Iraq build them illegally and use them as their citizens! Brilliant.
Not.
So, back to the dung; the first twenty minutes of this have virtually no dialogue. The viewer watches some guy with a woman (I'm guessing his girlfriend, etc) 'escaping' from this quarantined area. In our first scene with the hair couple, she promptly dies (bullet wound. He next saw her dragging her body to a horse barn (not begging from knowing about, not caring about the American South, it looks like A VERY well-off privately owned 'horsey hotel'. I'm gonna take a wild guess and say it's owned by the Clay brothers, mommy and daddy, and they're just two spoilt Southerners who are starving for attention and think they're film auteurs - they're not, but are too stupid to get two jobs, stop their folks foolishly spoil them-so touching.
Listen, there are many BETTER things one can do than watch stuff like this: paint a wall, read a book, go to the supermarket.
Anything but watching garbage like this.
Before I go, I just wanted to say how amusing it is (and I'm being VERY sarcastic) that this 'non-picture' has NOT one, but three entries into the 'plot' box in IMdB (I put a plot in parentheses because the dolts who write the things in those boxes DON'T know that a plot is NOT what it means when it CLEARLY says 'synopsis' on that box (a synopsis is JUST one, or, at most, two sentences which give A VERY brief overview of the film's main plotline. So instead of simply writing something like 'an explosion at a military base causes townsfolk nearby to turn into zombies', they think the longer, the better (BTW; whenever you see ANYTHING on ANY TV, the little box which tells you about what it is your watching - THAT'S the 'synopsis' box, and the reason SO MANY of these boxes are so filled they end with '...' - which must proper can't click on (their TV), is because of this very reason. One of THE WORST examples is some egotist who calls itself h-gg- I will not give it any more credit. Its main goal is to write novel-length things for EVERYthing.