rushknight
Joined Sep 2012
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings79
rushknight's rating
Reviews77
rushknight's rating
Chess. As a fan of the game I have watched many a movie that featured it, and have been disappointed several times when it became apparent that the movie makers had no intention of actually portraying the game as it is played. Instead, they usually content themselves with utilizing the game's mythos. We are given the impression that players of the game are very smart, they understand the "deep thinking" part of the game and live in a world far removed from the rest of us heathens, who don't know what the word "checkmate" means.
"Searching for Bobby Fisher" (1993) comes to mind as an example of one of those great movies that somehow disregarded the game entirely. I was horrified that they could make a movie about the game and purposely choose to remain ignorant of it, as if no one watching would notice. Yeah, guess who's gonna watch a movie about a famous chess player? Could it be.. other chess players?? I'm sure no one will notice that the games in the movie aren't real.
This movie is the first movie I've ever seen that uses actual historical games, play by play. It accurately uses the names of the openings, and has the actors playing the game for real as the viewer watches. The teacher talks about real historical chess players that shaped playing styles. That alone warrants 7 stars in my book.
The other two stars come from the quality of the film itself. This is not a movie about the game, it's about the people who played it. A group of "disadvantaged" kids who became winners. It's a great story. The actors did a great job. Character development was somewhat slim, but the viewer is carried along and learns to care about each of them. Their interplay is real, you really see that they are in touch with each other. John Leguizamo played a great part, I enjoyed it greatly.
The only reason I didn't give this a 10 was because I was put off just slightly by the "social justice" revising of history. José Raúl Capablanca didn't get marginalized and erased from history, that's a fabrication. He was world champion for 6 years and had a huge lasting influence on the game. Maybe the reason people don't know about him is because he was champion nearly 100 years ago. And Gabriel Maura from Puerto Rico? He did not "modernize" the game. He literally created a new version of it (called Modern Chess) which is popular in South America. That's why no one knows his name, it has nothing to do with his race. It has to do with the fact that these kids are living in the U.S. and don't play chess in South America. Shame shame people. -1 star.
Great movie, I really enjoyed it and I highly recommend it.
"Searching for Bobby Fisher" (1993) comes to mind as an example of one of those great movies that somehow disregarded the game entirely. I was horrified that they could make a movie about the game and purposely choose to remain ignorant of it, as if no one watching would notice. Yeah, guess who's gonna watch a movie about a famous chess player? Could it be.. other chess players?? I'm sure no one will notice that the games in the movie aren't real.
This movie is the first movie I've ever seen that uses actual historical games, play by play. It accurately uses the names of the openings, and has the actors playing the game for real as the viewer watches. The teacher talks about real historical chess players that shaped playing styles. That alone warrants 7 stars in my book.
The other two stars come from the quality of the film itself. This is not a movie about the game, it's about the people who played it. A group of "disadvantaged" kids who became winners. It's a great story. The actors did a great job. Character development was somewhat slim, but the viewer is carried along and learns to care about each of them. Their interplay is real, you really see that they are in touch with each other. John Leguizamo played a great part, I enjoyed it greatly.
The only reason I didn't give this a 10 was because I was put off just slightly by the "social justice" revising of history. José Raúl Capablanca didn't get marginalized and erased from history, that's a fabrication. He was world champion for 6 years and had a huge lasting influence on the game. Maybe the reason people don't know about him is because he was champion nearly 100 years ago. And Gabriel Maura from Puerto Rico? He did not "modernize" the game. He literally created a new version of it (called Modern Chess) which is popular in South America. That's why no one knows his name, it has nothing to do with his race. It has to do with the fact that these kids are living in the U.S. and don't play chess in South America. Shame shame people. -1 star.
Great movie, I really enjoyed it and I highly recommend it.
This is well acted. Everyone involved did a pretty good job of getting into their parts, and I appreciate it greatly when actors make the effort. It's what they should be doing and speaks well of them as professionals. I give them all kudos and frankly it's the only reason I rank this a 5 out of 10.
This is well filmed, it has that quality you hope to find in a movie when you view one: clear video, steady cameras, good story-boarding.
Unfortunately that's it. Plot wise it was very unoriginal. It's been done before by only, oh I don't know.. 60 or 70 other movies? I'm being facetious of course, but seriously, it's been done before. The plot was so stale that I was able to guess the ending almost immediately after the first hint was passed out. The second I heard, "28 children died" BOOM! I knew exactly what the ending was going to be. I also guessed the part about the co-worker. I won't spoil it, though trust me there isn't much to be spoiled. It was so predictable.
Additionally I felt like there were some real holes. Many of the scenes in the film were cliches from other movies, but some of them were left somewhat uncooked. This happens mainly in the supporting characters. They'll say something like (loose paraphrase to avoid spoiler) "You know what we did!" And then we never find out what they did. Lol.
As far as being scared goes, there is little to scare you. The special effects are limited (thankfully) and when they do appear they are not terribly effective.
I think the biggest problem is that there is a very discernible lack of focus. Is this a scary movie? It's not that scary. Is it a mystery? It's too easy to guess. Is it a comedy, nope. Is this about the (NON-SPOILER CHARACTER) or the other (NON-SPOILER CHARACTER)? Maybe neither? It felt as though the intent of the film kept changing somewhere in the middle. All told, it just didn't fly with me.
This is well filmed, it has that quality you hope to find in a movie when you view one: clear video, steady cameras, good story-boarding.
Unfortunately that's it. Plot wise it was very unoriginal. It's been done before by only, oh I don't know.. 60 or 70 other movies? I'm being facetious of course, but seriously, it's been done before. The plot was so stale that I was able to guess the ending almost immediately after the first hint was passed out. The second I heard, "28 children died" BOOM! I knew exactly what the ending was going to be. I also guessed the part about the co-worker. I won't spoil it, though trust me there isn't much to be spoiled. It was so predictable.
Additionally I felt like there were some real holes. Many of the scenes in the film were cliches from other movies, but some of them were left somewhat uncooked. This happens mainly in the supporting characters. They'll say something like (loose paraphrase to avoid spoiler) "You know what we did!" And then we never find out what they did. Lol.
As far as being scared goes, there is little to scare you. The special effects are limited (thankfully) and when they do appear they are not terribly effective.
I think the biggest problem is that there is a very discernible lack of focus. Is this a scary movie? It's not that scary. Is it a mystery? It's too easy to guess. Is it a comedy, nope. Is this about the (NON-SPOILER CHARACTER) or the other (NON-SPOILER CHARACTER)? Maybe neither? It felt as though the intent of the film kept changing somewhere in the middle. All told, it just didn't fly with me.
Simply put, entertainment from start to finish. The best rating I can give is when I enjoy a movie from start to finish.
The voice acting is completely in character, the turtles and The GD Batman are all totally true to their personalities and story lines. Michaelangelo was at his best. He actually was never my favorite turtle, his "surfer dude" humor never struck home with me in the cartoon, but here it works very well. Raphael has the personality and story line that came from the 1990's movie, so he is not quite the same turtle from the cartoon, but he is dang good here also. Leonardo and Donatello both are the same as before, but even better. You know something is well made when much loved characters become more loved by the end.
Speaking of characters becoming more loved, Baxter Stockman is here too, and even he's a great character! Seriously, they just did a good job on them all. No Bebop and Rocksteady though. Ha ha, those two never get a break.
The plot is just good enough to be plausibly comic-book. This is not necessarily a kids movie, it can be surprisingly violent, although some younger folks might like it. I am in my 40's and grew up on TMNT, and this movie brought it all back, and then some.
The humor was fantastic. The jokes were totally fitting and eloquently timed. The writing was very good, the action was fun, the interplay between The GD Batman and his crew with the turtles was very enjoyable.
Seriously, this is a good one, watch it. Preferably with friends or share the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles with your kids. Keep the legend alive. I've personally watched it now 4 times just for fun. That's pretty rare for me to repeat a movie even once, but this one was just good fun.
The voice acting is completely in character, the turtles and The GD Batman are all totally true to their personalities and story lines. Michaelangelo was at his best. He actually was never my favorite turtle, his "surfer dude" humor never struck home with me in the cartoon, but here it works very well. Raphael has the personality and story line that came from the 1990's movie, so he is not quite the same turtle from the cartoon, but he is dang good here also. Leonardo and Donatello both are the same as before, but even better. You know something is well made when much loved characters become more loved by the end.
Speaking of characters becoming more loved, Baxter Stockman is here too, and even he's a great character! Seriously, they just did a good job on them all. No Bebop and Rocksteady though. Ha ha, those two never get a break.
The plot is just good enough to be plausibly comic-book. This is not necessarily a kids movie, it can be surprisingly violent, although some younger folks might like it. I am in my 40's and grew up on TMNT, and this movie brought it all back, and then some.
The humor was fantastic. The jokes were totally fitting and eloquently timed. The writing was very good, the action was fun, the interplay between The GD Batman and his crew with the turtles was very enjoyable.
Seriously, this is a good one, watch it. Preferably with friends or share the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles with your kids. Keep the legend alive. I've personally watched it now 4 times just for fun. That's pretty rare for me to repeat a movie even once, but this one was just good fun.