Smarmelade
Joined Nov 2012
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings2.3K
Smarmelade's rating
Reviews149
Smarmelade's rating
I loved Love Death and Robots, it was a showcase of shorts from creators that really wanted to make those. There was art, creative output.
Secret Level is someone seeing Love Death and Robots and saying "give me that, but for my existing intellectual property". It was made to order and the order was a bunch of ads and promo for certain IPs, barely a celebration of gaming and it's history. It has no soul.
Just to cover it right away, animation was great in all, nothing to add there, problem lies in concept itself and narrative execution.
Now, there is title diversity but games selection is weird. Some episodes were actually fun - New World, for a game made by Amazon in an Amazon show, of all things, fronted by Arnold Schwarzenegger. It was silly and fun. Armored Core with Keanu Reeves, SIFU and WH40K were all fine.
Pac-Man was something completely different but something was slightly off and it didn't work for me. Crossfire was just waste of time. Do people care about Unreal Tournament in 2024? Exodus, which is a game that is not even out yet, so no one knows anything about it anyway. Concord was DOA as a game, so that episode was whatever.
Spelunky, DnD, MegaMan and Outer Worlds were ok.
Then there is Honor of Kings - a mobile gatcha cancer game from China, that even China tried to curb it's success, but failed. That episode was kinda ok on surface, but also about a cancer game from hell.
And, the worst thing, at the very end, last episode was a literal PlaySation ad with Kevin Hart voicing some robot. What can you say to that?
Whole format from Love Death and Robots worked because there was passion and art about those shorts. This is just same format but used to make ads basically.
Maybe there will be Season 2, maybe they'll learn from this season and improve on it, but - although some shorts worked fine, overall concept is maybe flawed and this will never work like LDR did.
Can I recommend it? Short answer - no. Long answer - maybe if you want to see some proof of concept of famous video games and how would they work as CGI movie/series, then maybe watch this. Otherwise, nothing to see here.
Secret Level is someone seeing Love Death and Robots and saying "give me that, but for my existing intellectual property". It was made to order and the order was a bunch of ads and promo for certain IPs, barely a celebration of gaming and it's history. It has no soul.
Just to cover it right away, animation was great in all, nothing to add there, problem lies in concept itself and narrative execution.
Now, there is title diversity but games selection is weird. Some episodes were actually fun - New World, for a game made by Amazon in an Amazon show, of all things, fronted by Arnold Schwarzenegger. It was silly and fun. Armored Core with Keanu Reeves, SIFU and WH40K were all fine.
Pac-Man was something completely different but something was slightly off and it didn't work for me. Crossfire was just waste of time. Do people care about Unreal Tournament in 2024? Exodus, which is a game that is not even out yet, so no one knows anything about it anyway. Concord was DOA as a game, so that episode was whatever.
Spelunky, DnD, MegaMan and Outer Worlds were ok.
Then there is Honor of Kings - a mobile gatcha cancer game from China, that even China tried to curb it's success, but failed. That episode was kinda ok on surface, but also about a cancer game from hell.
And, the worst thing, at the very end, last episode was a literal PlaySation ad with Kevin Hart voicing some robot. What can you say to that?
Whole format from Love Death and Robots worked because there was passion and art about those shorts. This is just same format but used to make ads basically.
Maybe there will be Season 2, maybe they'll learn from this season and improve on it, but - although some shorts worked fine, overall concept is maybe flawed and this will never work like LDR did.
Can I recommend it? Short answer - no. Long answer - maybe if you want to see some proof of concept of famous video games and how would they work as CGI movie/series, then maybe watch this. Otherwise, nothing to see here.
It turns out that Hellboy the comic book audience is not the same as Hellboy the movies.
I love the comic, I like del Toro's first movie, second one not so much because it's not Hellboy, it's standard Guillermo del Toro grim fantasy fare. Third movie is just expensive trash with some ok moments.
I liked this movie, I liked Jack Kesy. Does it look a bit cheap? Yes, but I thought most effects were pretty good. Solid number of practical effect also.
Worst I can say about this movie is that I didn't like photography, filters. It's lower budget movie but not that low, apparently it was around 20 million budget. It should not look like it was shot with random digital camera. Also, accents are a bit too much and unconvincing.
Story is a bit monster of the week thing than a movie material. This would work better as a TV show.
There's not much action and Hellboy is much more of a spectator than the main guy. There are also some weird editing choices but all in all it's and okay movie. Acting is fine, plot is simple and interesting, it has good shots.
I like Guillermo del Toro but I think he, for better or for worse, ruined Hellboy cinematic journey. Because in one hand, people who liked his movies, now expect only that, which kinda is not Hellboy, especially the second movie. In other hand, movie with David Harbour was more Hellboy than del Toro's movie, but it was a bad movie. Crooked Man is somewhere in the middle.
Could this be better? Yes. Is it really bad? No. It's fine and it barely even went to theaters, it's pretty much straight to streaming. And for that, it's enough. Audience should give this a chance but ultimately - Hellboy works maybe the best if it's turned into a series. Hopefully not on Netflix.
I love the comic, I like del Toro's first movie, second one not so much because it's not Hellboy, it's standard Guillermo del Toro grim fantasy fare. Third movie is just expensive trash with some ok moments.
I liked this movie, I liked Jack Kesy. Does it look a bit cheap? Yes, but I thought most effects were pretty good. Solid number of practical effect also.
Worst I can say about this movie is that I didn't like photography, filters. It's lower budget movie but not that low, apparently it was around 20 million budget. It should not look like it was shot with random digital camera. Also, accents are a bit too much and unconvincing.
Story is a bit monster of the week thing than a movie material. This would work better as a TV show.
There's not much action and Hellboy is much more of a spectator than the main guy. There are also some weird editing choices but all in all it's and okay movie. Acting is fine, plot is simple and interesting, it has good shots.
I like Guillermo del Toro but I think he, for better or for worse, ruined Hellboy cinematic journey. Because in one hand, people who liked his movies, now expect only that, which kinda is not Hellboy, especially the second movie. In other hand, movie with David Harbour was more Hellboy than del Toro's movie, but it was a bad movie. Crooked Man is somewhere in the middle.
Could this be better? Yes. Is it really bad? No. It's fine and it barely even went to theaters, it's pretty much straight to streaming. And for that, it's enough. Audience should give this a chance but ultimately - Hellboy works maybe the best if it's turned into a series. Hopefully not on Netflix.
This movie is terrible. It's not even a movie, but a WB sponsored vehicle for his daughter's mid singing and bad acting career. Case of rampant nepotism.
As always, he hooks you on a interesting premise and then he tricks you and shows you a bad movie.
M Night Shyamalan is a cinematic serial killer.
This premise in the hands of someone talented would be a great show or a movie. But this, this is slop.
Dialogue is written by a five year old, tempo is wildly bad. Movie looks like it's gonna end three or four times.
How can someone make movies for so long and still be bad at it, and even getting worse? And studios bankroll this. It's Eli Roth all over again.
Dude had Sixth Sense, Unbreakable and Split, everything else sucked, some of them big time. And it's in the genes, his daughter's movie - Watchers, sucked as well and in the same way most of his movies suck.
Most shocking thing here, though, is that this movie is one and a half hour long. It felt like five hours of start-stop-start-stop circling around the drain.
Waste of time, do not watch.
As always, he hooks you on a interesting premise and then he tricks you and shows you a bad movie.
M Night Shyamalan is a cinematic serial killer.
This premise in the hands of someone talented would be a great show or a movie. But this, this is slop.
Dialogue is written by a five year old, tempo is wildly bad. Movie looks like it's gonna end three or four times.
How can someone make movies for so long and still be bad at it, and even getting worse? And studios bankroll this. It's Eli Roth all over again.
Dude had Sixth Sense, Unbreakable and Split, everything else sucked, some of them big time. And it's in the genes, his daughter's movie - Watchers, sucked as well and in the same way most of his movies suck.
Most shocking thing here, though, is that this movie is one and a half hour long. It felt like five hours of start-stop-start-stop circling around the drain.
Waste of time, do not watch.