alejandroperez1971

Tastes are like colors or flavors. But I find it strange when there are people who call this movie the best John Wick or that it is an excellent film. IMO, beyond the fact that someone adores the film of fights and combats without analyzing its production, I think that to end up giving opinions like these, you have to at least analyze a % of the film. Or at least the most striking details. This movie may have many fights but those choreographies can be summarized in two aspects. One: A blind man who can dodge bullets, blows, or swords. Even why would I have to fight with a blind man if it is assumed that any shot would be lethal to him? Two: In hand-to-hand fights, they use short weapons that block them so well that the shots do not hit anyone, not even the feet. The movie is so full of these types of details that I can describe it as ridiculous. It is a not very serious film, closer to a mockery of this type of cinema. In other words, a comedy. If we analyze that the movie is a John Wick then the conclusion, we reach is that this movie is the worst of the bunch. Very bad movie.

It looks like a Telemundo novel. As bad as "The Queen of the South". Historically bad, cheap and deplorable scenario. With dresses and hairstyles of the 20th century. The backgrounds are images and not real buildings. Bad actions. Really a little serious issue, like a series of meaningless adventures. As in a cabin in the middle of the forest they are looking for a baby and they cheats the guards with another baby. Seriously ? Where did they get she from? Horrible. Poorly thought. Bad elaborate. To say that the prince say he is listening 6 horses, when the camera move out outside in effect come six horses. Oh my God....

Bad movie. The performance is really bad. Actors so novice and bad. The film does not convince. I give 1.0