ghost0ne
Joined Feb 2005
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews17
ghost0ne's rating
Blah, blah, blah, this movie sucked. It sucked even more with the corny English dub and predictable story line. Blah, blah, blah. Yes, we all know it sucks. Ok. But I'm getting a little tired of seeing people always say, there's always one in all the reviews I read who's like, "The CGI sucked! Did they make this movie on a Windows 1884?!" They always exaggerate for a joke (or maybe it's not a joke and they truly believe that) but the CGI sucks compared to what? They never say that. I mean, even back in the mid 1990's (before everyone decided they wanted to be offended by everything) when they made Jurassic Park - that was convincing CGI. It looked like, at least at the time, that it belonged there. When people say the CGI sucked do they mean it doesn't look realistic? Is that the standard because if it is the standard they are using then I put to them, in the same vein, that all the Marvel and DC movies suck too! I mean, no one looking at these movies is gonna be like, "Oh my God! That looks so real!" Because it doesn't. Even Avatar doesn't look realistic. The CGI is bad. Compared to what?! And, on the same note, some people will say the CGI looks great. Is there no objective standard in the quality of CGI? How can it be both bad and good? I've heard people say some modern movies's graphics look like the were made on a PS2 (clearing throat - Critical Drinker). Have you even seen those blocky character models from the PS2 era? It doesn't mate. Modern graphics for big budget movies doesn't look anything like that. And the comparisons they do use to compare modern CGI to movies or games decades in the past are idiotic and nobody with a memory and a brain would say that comparison is similar. And for those people who say the CGI sucks and that's the main reason for not liking the movie. Is that all there is for you? CGI? There's no more depth to you and your taste than CGI? Don't get me wrong, the story in this movie sucks too but with all the things wrong with this movie subjectively "terrible" CGI is the least of them. I don't know, I come from a motion graphics background so when I see these CGIs, although it doesn't look photo realistic, it is still technically, very good. But what do I know. CGI Sucks = Movie Sucks!