MovieHead123
Joined Mar 2013
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews79
MovieHead123's rating
Toby Wallace is a skilled actor, but his casting in Finestkind as a wealthy American kid falls flat for one major reason: he doesn't quite look the part. In a film where appearance and background are crucial to the story, Wallace's portrayal struggles with the details, particularly in terms of his physical appearance.
One of the most noticeable issues is his teeth. While this may seem like a minor point, it's actually quite significant. American rich kids, especially in movies, are typically shown with perfect, straight, and gleaming white teeth-symbols of their privileged upbringing and access to top-notch healthcare. Wallace's less-than-perfect smile breaks the illusion, making it hard to believe that his character comes from wealth.
This disconnect becomes even more jarring when two other characters in the film compare Wallace's character to Justin Bieber, a clear indicator that he's supposed to be a pretty boy. Bieber, known for his polished image, sets a high standard for the kind of aesthetic the film is aiming for with Wallace's character. Unfortunately, Wallace doesn't quite match up to this expectation. His portrayal lacks the refined, polished look that you'd expect from someone who's supposed to be a well-groomed, wealthy youth.
In a story where class and image play a significant role, these details are more than just superficial-they're essential to the believability of the character. Despite Wallace's acting abilities, the visual inconsistencies distract from his performance and make it difficult to fully accept him in the role. Ultimately, this miscasting detracts from the overall impact of Finestkind, leaving viewers questioning the authenticity of his character.
One of the most noticeable issues is his teeth. While this may seem like a minor point, it's actually quite significant. American rich kids, especially in movies, are typically shown with perfect, straight, and gleaming white teeth-symbols of their privileged upbringing and access to top-notch healthcare. Wallace's less-than-perfect smile breaks the illusion, making it hard to believe that his character comes from wealth.
This disconnect becomes even more jarring when two other characters in the film compare Wallace's character to Justin Bieber, a clear indicator that he's supposed to be a pretty boy. Bieber, known for his polished image, sets a high standard for the kind of aesthetic the film is aiming for with Wallace's character. Unfortunately, Wallace doesn't quite match up to this expectation. His portrayal lacks the refined, polished look that you'd expect from someone who's supposed to be a well-groomed, wealthy youth.
In a story where class and image play a significant role, these details are more than just superficial-they're essential to the believability of the character. Despite Wallace's acting abilities, the visual inconsistencies distract from his performance and make it difficult to fully accept him in the role. Ultimately, this miscasting detracts from the overall impact of Finestkind, leaving viewers questioning the authenticity of his character.
I first saw this movie as a teenager and loved it just as much as *When Harry Met Sally*. However, rewatching it as an adult, my feelings have changed significantly. While the movie was good for its time, I now see that Sarah Jessica Parker and Eric Schaeffer have no chemistry together. Eric Schaeffer, though talented, doesn't quite fit the role he plays.
I also feel his character could have had a more compelling storyline with Elle Macpherson's character. Despite their minimal chemistry, it still surpassed that of his with Sarah Jessica Parker. Perhaps the issue lies in the "platonic best friends fall in love" cliché, which wasn't as overdone when the movie was first released. A different narrative focus might have resulted in a more engaging love story.
Additionally, while *When Harry Met Sally* remains timeless despite its use of clichés, this movie hasn't aged as well. The supporting cast, while enjoyable, doesn't quite make up for the central lack of chemistry.
I also feel his character could have had a more compelling storyline with Elle Macpherson's character. Despite their minimal chemistry, it still surpassed that of his with Sarah Jessica Parker. Perhaps the issue lies in the "platonic best friends fall in love" cliché, which wasn't as overdone when the movie was first released. A different narrative focus might have resulted in a more engaging love story.
Additionally, while *When Harry Met Sally* remains timeless despite its use of clichés, this movie hasn't aged as well. The supporting cast, while enjoyable, doesn't quite make up for the central lack of chemistry.