lifesentence7
Joined Apr 2013
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews18
lifesentence7's rating
Perhaps the most haphazardly edited mess I've seen in quite a while.
A story needs to have a flow, that being provided by the director and the editor.
This mess seems like a bunch of unstructured scenes strung together without any guide.
The script is a mess too, the characters are less than credible, the young journo is a nut case and wouldn't have been able to carry through...and what's with the bs film camera? She also only takes one shot at a time wtf??? The very reason we use digital equipment is it allows us to 'blast' 20-30 shots on any given moment so we can hopefully get 1 or 2 great shots from the massive library, anyone that uses film is delusional.
She, more than once takes an extreme risk to get the shot and only hits the shutter once...methinks a motor drive is needed here.
The male offsiders (with the exception of the older guy) are flaky and not up to the task ( these guys are supposed to be veterans of combat photo journalism.
No spoilers but the end falls flattering than a pancake on Wednesday.
Go back and re-edit for proper flow at least!
A story needs to have a flow, that being provided by the director and the editor.
This mess seems like a bunch of unstructured scenes strung together without any guide.
The script is a mess too, the characters are less than credible, the young journo is a nut case and wouldn't have been able to carry through...and what's with the bs film camera? She also only takes one shot at a time wtf??? The very reason we use digital equipment is it allows us to 'blast' 20-30 shots on any given moment so we can hopefully get 1 or 2 great shots from the massive library, anyone that uses film is delusional.
She, more than once takes an extreme risk to get the shot and only hits the shutter once...methinks a motor drive is needed here.
The male offsiders (with the exception of the older guy) are flaky and not up to the task ( these guys are supposed to be veterans of combat photo journalism.
No spoilers but the end falls flattering than a pancake on Wednesday.
Go back and re-edit for proper flow at least!
Starts out looking like a bit of fun with perhaps a redemption story in the making.
But then Conor McGregor turns up and it is obvious that he isn't an actors bootlace.
And what's with the stance and walk? He looks like has is getting around with an invisible broom handle up his jacksy! Very ordinary.
The villain is so bad that I doubt that he would have made it to adulthood, without serious personal injury.
And the father figure? Let's leave that part of the story on the floor next time.
Minimal interaction at the book store then becomes the catalyst for the final fight, not much there.
The redemption story is left out and instead it descends into a joke of a story.
But then Conor McGregor turns up and it is obvious that he isn't an actors bootlace.
And what's with the stance and walk? He looks like has is getting around with an invisible broom handle up his jacksy! Very ordinary.
The villain is so bad that I doubt that he would have made it to adulthood, without serious personal injury.
And the father figure? Let's leave that part of the story on the floor next time.
Minimal interaction at the book store then becomes the catalyst for the final fight, not much there.
The redemption story is left out and instead it descends into a joke of a story.