ginocox-206-336968
Joined Jan 2015
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings264
ginocox-206-336968's rating
Reviews257
ginocox-206-336968's rating
The Agency (Season One) manages to be simultaneously awesome and awful; incredibly authentic in the tiniest detail, yet not the least bit credible in the central love story. The series weaves together three major plots involving Ethiopia, Ukraine, and Iran; rivalries between the United States, Great Britain, China, and Russia; and the intertwined personal lives and ambitions of a fairly large cast of characters.
The plot is satisfyingly complex and realistic, although keeping track of all the plots, subplots, duplicities, and deceptions across ten episodes can be challenging, even if one binge-watches. Several loose threads, each involving the demise of a character, are left to the viewer's imagination. The final scene seems a bit rushed and contrived to provide Hollywood endings to several plot threads.
Michael Fassbender plays Martian, a highly-competent CIA field agent who is reassigned to deskwork after an extended tour of duty in Ethiopia, a hub of internal turmoil and geopolitical intrigue. Martian is intellectually brilliant, multilingual, and expert at deceiving and manipulating highly intelligent people who are expert at recognizing deception. He also bears deep psychological wounds.
With one notable exception, performances are excellent, nuanced, and credible, most notably by Michael Fassbender, Jeffrey Wright, Saura Lightfoot-Leon, Richard Gere, and Kurt Egyiawan. While perceptual bias may be involved, the male roles generally seem nuanced and layered, but several of the female roles come across as male characters portrayed by female actors. Martian's daughter Poppy seems inconsistent and contrived to add periodic speed bumps in the script; and the actress seems much too old for the role. As has become de rigueur, all of the onscreen romances save one are cross-cultural. The central role of Sami, Martian's obsessive love interest, is horribly miscast.
Beauty is subjective and attraction can be unpredictable; however, from passport bros to expatriates, financially secure Western guys in Third-World and developing nations can box well above their weight in the game of romance. A guy like Martian working in Ethiopia could credibly find himself aggressively pursued by several stunningly beautiful ladies who would be out of reach for most guys back in the States. Yet, while he seems to have no other romantic interests, he becomes obsessed with a married Muslim woman of mannish stature and appearance, who seems moody and brooding most of the time, is more passionate about forging a political alliance with China than romance, dresses modestly, and is declared strictly off-limits by both his superiors and a ruthlessly protective Ethiopian security agent. The character seems contrived to appeal to a progressive female audience rather than to motivate Martian's choices. Their pairing seems so improbable that other characters are obliged to rationalize it at several points.
The series is so rich in plot complexities, character nuances, and background detail that viewers could watch it several times and appreciate aspects each time which escaped notice on prior viewings.
The plot is satisfyingly complex and realistic, although keeping track of all the plots, subplots, duplicities, and deceptions across ten episodes can be challenging, even if one binge-watches. Several loose threads, each involving the demise of a character, are left to the viewer's imagination. The final scene seems a bit rushed and contrived to provide Hollywood endings to several plot threads.
Michael Fassbender plays Martian, a highly-competent CIA field agent who is reassigned to deskwork after an extended tour of duty in Ethiopia, a hub of internal turmoil and geopolitical intrigue. Martian is intellectually brilliant, multilingual, and expert at deceiving and manipulating highly intelligent people who are expert at recognizing deception. He also bears deep psychological wounds.
With one notable exception, performances are excellent, nuanced, and credible, most notably by Michael Fassbender, Jeffrey Wright, Saura Lightfoot-Leon, Richard Gere, and Kurt Egyiawan. While perceptual bias may be involved, the male roles generally seem nuanced and layered, but several of the female roles come across as male characters portrayed by female actors. Martian's daughter Poppy seems inconsistent and contrived to add periodic speed bumps in the script; and the actress seems much too old for the role. As has become de rigueur, all of the onscreen romances save one are cross-cultural. The central role of Sami, Martian's obsessive love interest, is horribly miscast.
Beauty is subjective and attraction can be unpredictable; however, from passport bros to expatriates, financially secure Western guys in Third-World and developing nations can box well above their weight in the game of romance. A guy like Martian working in Ethiopia could credibly find himself aggressively pursued by several stunningly beautiful ladies who would be out of reach for most guys back in the States. Yet, while he seems to have no other romantic interests, he becomes obsessed with a married Muslim woman of mannish stature and appearance, who seems moody and brooding most of the time, is more passionate about forging a political alliance with China than romance, dresses modestly, and is declared strictly off-limits by both his superiors and a ruthlessly protective Ethiopian security agent. The character seems contrived to appeal to a progressive female audience rather than to motivate Martian's choices. Their pairing seems so improbable that other characters are obliged to rationalize it at several points.
The series is so rich in plot complexities, character nuances, and background detail that viewers could watch it several times and appreciate aspects each time which escaped notice on prior viewings.
Back in Action (2025) offers some solid chase sequences, at least when wheeled vehicles are used, less so with boats and on foot. Production values are excellent with extravagant foreign locations. The fight scenes are well choreographed, although the execution is disappointing. Most are shot in subdued lighting with a lot of quick cuts, presumably because stunt doubles are doing most of the heavy lifting, which makes it difficult to see the big picture and leads to some seeming incongruities.
The film tries to be an action comedy, but lacks the energy and outrageous humor of films like Johnny English (2003) and Spy (2015), so winds up feeling something like a cross between a 1970s TV movie and something the Hallmark Channel might air, with a mishmash of familiar tropes. It seems very middle-of-the-road, and determined to be politically correct and inoffensive. Nothing is sexy, sensual, or erotic. There are no torrid love scenes, bare bosoms, or even any short skirts, bikinis, or lingerie. If the producer's girlfriend has a role, it must have been very brief. Neither is it frightening, gory, surprising, shocking, cerebral, or cathartic. Although the bad guys fire a lot of bullets with the accuracy of storm troopers, there are several scenes where the good guys avoid using firearms, find them ineffective, or are disgusted to learn firearms actually hurt. Each of the three romantic relationships are cross-cultural. All are tame, but two are treated as scandalous.
At fifty-nine and fifty-two respectively, Jamie Foxx and Cameron Diaz both look great for their respective ages, but neither is as fit, trim, or agile as they were a quarter of a century ago. Their characters are perhaps late twenties or early thirties in the opening scenes and early-to-mid-forties in the later scenes. The action scenes might have been more convincing with actors in their late twenties or early thirties.
Overall, the film seems well suited to multi-tasking. The final punchline is actually amusing.
The film tries to be an action comedy, but lacks the energy and outrageous humor of films like Johnny English (2003) and Spy (2015), so winds up feeling something like a cross between a 1970s TV movie and something the Hallmark Channel might air, with a mishmash of familiar tropes. It seems very middle-of-the-road, and determined to be politically correct and inoffensive. Nothing is sexy, sensual, or erotic. There are no torrid love scenes, bare bosoms, or even any short skirts, bikinis, or lingerie. If the producer's girlfriend has a role, it must have been very brief. Neither is it frightening, gory, surprising, shocking, cerebral, or cathartic. Although the bad guys fire a lot of bullets with the accuracy of storm troopers, there are several scenes where the good guys avoid using firearms, find them ineffective, or are disgusted to learn firearms actually hurt. Each of the three romantic relationships are cross-cultural. All are tame, but two are treated as scandalous.
At fifty-nine and fifty-two respectively, Jamie Foxx and Cameron Diaz both look great for their respective ages, but neither is as fit, trim, or agile as they were a quarter of a century ago. Their characters are perhaps late twenties or early thirties in the opening scenes and early-to-mid-forties in the later scenes. The action scenes might have been more convincing with actors in their late twenties or early thirties.
Overall, the film seems well suited to multi-tasking. The final punchline is actually amusing.