ricewithaspoon

This program was utterly unnecessary & sort of atrocious.

0 research, randos cashing in with their stupid comments & speculations.. contributing 0 to actually getting some answers and learning.

Why didn't her siblings care? Was a psych evaluation done?

Why didn't you try interview people close to them?

Why didn't you rando people actually do sthg to learn about the case you can then report on instead of using bodycam footage - which has been seen by the whole world by that point. Any coverage on youtube was better than this.

(Great....review too short. And I'm supposed to put more work into a review than they did on a program which they got paid for and streamed? What world are we living in? This is bizarre... everybody cashing in on some bs. It's pathetic!)

First of all, I am not convinced he did or didn't do it - So this is a review from someone who has not taken a side.

Episode 1 100% 'opinions' by family & friends (= them cashing on on her death/murder - seems a bit vulgar to me.) 0% evidence shown or reviewed.

Episode 2: Miss Fry chanting "me, poor victim" once again. She met him 4! Times. Why come on to this? Desperate need for attention? Why not get a therapist instead if she is traumatised so much? My eyes cannot roll enough. Again 0% evidence reviewed, no interviews with professionals, forensic scientists, pathologists or the like.

Episode 3 People (not psychologists or behavioural analysts) interpreting his 'behaviour'. Trial gossip, nothing new - every sane, rational person would have deduced this should have ended in a mistrial, but hey who cares right? As long as the media can milk something it's all good. We have Fry again.. talking about herself, she cares for her reputation, talking about her 'relationship' - which I would call at best 'a fling'.

3/4 of the overall content is archive/news footage we've already seen. They might as well have made a 3hr Nancy Grace special about this case - might have been more entertaining at least. Netflix, seriously... there were times were you put emphasis on quality and not 'gossip'.

Overall this left me with a yuckie taste & wasted time.

I'm waiting for "Face to Face"..

I was looking forward to this.

4 episods into this: major disappointment.

I have nothing against Piers Morgan, but this should have been called: "Make Piers believe".

He interrupts, he is belligerent, he is confrontational.

There are no clever questions that allow the viewing public to discern for themselves where the truth lies & the focus is not on showing 'opposing' facts of the crime.

Piers ends the interviews with "I don't believe you" - making himself the jury, judge & executioner.

Then we get a mini post-interview with Piers himself in which he again states how he doesn't believe them, how he interviewed soooooo many killers and how he is able to spot lies... it's just cringe & makes him look full of himself.

Imo he could use a bit humility - He appears quite arrogant here.