pfne
Joined Dec 2017
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings184
pfne's rating
Reviews170
pfne's rating
Sue's his neighbour for lawyer fees after false reports.
Right from the get go you can tell this little man has insecurity issues. Judy usually.picks up on attitudes like this little fellas, but in their episode she allows him to interrupt, be jittery and pay with papers etc.
Judy focuses on the defendant as though the defendant had done something wrong. She hadn't.
She reported what she thought was a crime, twice.
That upsets the feeble little Douglas Auerbach.
He begins making lewd comments and threats to the ring camera of a woman 25 years younger than him.
It shows him for the feeble-minded, weak little man he is.
Now many people around the world has seen you Douglas Auerbach, insecurity taken out on a young woman. Pathetic.
Right from the get go you can tell this little man has insecurity issues. Judy usually.picks up on attitudes like this little fellas, but in their episode she allows him to interrupt, be jittery and pay with papers etc.
Judy focuses on the defendant as though the defendant had done something wrong. She hadn't.
She reported what she thought was a crime, twice.
That upsets the feeble little Douglas Auerbach.
He begins making lewd comments and threats to the ring camera of a woman 25 years younger than him.
It shows him for the feeble-minded, weak little man he is.
Now many people around the world has seen you Douglas Auerbach, insecurity taken out on a young woman. Pathetic.
I don't know who was thinking what when they cast The Angela Bassett, but they got it wrong when they asked her to do an accent. It's just so strangely off and weird, like she's trying to do an English person's idea of an American Doing a Royal Family Accent. It's distracting. Not quite from the Dick Van Dyke School Of Accents, but it's not good.
Luckily she's not in that much of the movie, the first 30 minutes or so.
And that's when the film starts btw. You could fast forward the first 30 minutes, watch it on 4x speed and get a perfect idea of what's going on.
The rest of the film gets progressively more predictable and clichéd from there.
If I had to sum up this whole movie in a couple lines, I'd go with: "That's a tough situation, gonna be hard for her to get out of that one" "Actually super easy, barely an inconvenience" "Oh really?"
But I don't wish to spoiler anything.
The cgi is meh.
The green screening is, meh the story is, meh the action is ok in parts.
A dull, mediocre and predictable movie that looks ok at times.
Luckily she's not in that much of the movie, the first 30 minutes or so.
And that's when the film starts btw. You could fast forward the first 30 minutes, watch it on 4x speed and get a perfect idea of what's going on.
The rest of the film gets progressively more predictable and clichéd from there.
If I had to sum up this whole movie in a couple lines, I'd go with: "That's a tough situation, gonna be hard for her to get out of that one" "Actually super easy, barely an inconvenience" "Oh really?"
But I don't wish to spoiler anything.
The cgi is meh.
The green screening is, meh the story is, meh the action is ok in parts.
A dull, mediocre and predictable movie that looks ok at times.
....they should have spent more on casting.
I mean, auditions, they probably aren't cheap, but it's better than just casting people because they look a certain way. THE ACTING IS AWFUL. Ok you can kind of forgive the kids.. they're particularly bad but they're kids.. but the adults aren't much better either.
When adults or kids are giving long exposition dumps and the camera cuts back and forth and here and there and the dialogue changes volume and tempo, yeah, that's too hide the awful performances. If the actors were capable of actually acting, they could leave the camera rolling and have longer takes of matched up dialogue.
But .. anywho.
The CGI is shoddy, there's YouTube channels producing better CGI on a fraction of the budget.
The greenscreening is awful, particularly in the first episode with a boat, it looks like something from a 90s kids show.
Is it worth a watch? Meh. Not really.
The cartoon exists, it may be older, but it is absolutely leagues ahead of this.
Cringe, bad effects, awful acting from the people cast because they look like the cartoon counter parts.
I mean, auditions, they probably aren't cheap, but it's better than just casting people because they look a certain way. THE ACTING IS AWFUL. Ok you can kind of forgive the kids.. they're particularly bad but they're kids.. but the adults aren't much better either.
When adults or kids are giving long exposition dumps and the camera cuts back and forth and here and there and the dialogue changes volume and tempo, yeah, that's too hide the awful performances. If the actors were capable of actually acting, they could leave the camera rolling and have longer takes of matched up dialogue.
But .. anywho.
The CGI is shoddy, there's YouTube channels producing better CGI on a fraction of the budget.
The greenscreening is awful, particularly in the first episode with a boat, it looks like something from a 90s kids show.
Is it worth a watch? Meh. Not really.
The cartoon exists, it may be older, but it is absolutely leagues ahead of this.
Cringe, bad effects, awful acting from the people cast because they look like the cartoon counter parts.