johnmichael-2
Joined Mar 2006
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings1.4K
johnmichael-2's rating
Reviews55
johnmichael-2's rating
"Are women funny?" Bonnie McFarland asks
The answer is simple: YES. Of course.
Wanda Sykes, Lisa Lampanelli, Whitney Cummings, Natasha Leggiero, Amy Schumer, Marina Franklin, Rachel Feinstein, Nikki Glaser, Sarah Silverman... and that's just standup. Then there's Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, Kristen Wiig, Maya Rudolph, Melissa McCarthy, Jane Lynch, Ellen Degeneres, Mindy Kaling, and a bunch of others that will come to me when I'm not actually writing this off the top of my head. That's not to even mention the greats like Joan Rivers, Lucille Ball, Mary Tyler Moore, all the Golden Girls (Bea Arthur, Betty White, Estelle Getty, and Rue McClanahan), and others I'm too young to remember.
I wish this documentary had been about showing us funny women, instead of 80 minutes of existential crises. Even better would have been if this documentary had exposed me to some female comedians who I hadn't known before. Awkwardly enough, a lot of the women I mentioned above actually showed up for one- or two-minute cameos, but not nearly long enough to showcase their incredible talent.
The hardest thing is that, in the end, this expose-of-sorts didn't even bolster its own cause. It was unfocused, unfunny, and her husband Rich Vos was awkwardly omnipresent. There's already too many men in this documentary as it is.
The answer is simple: YES. Of course.
Wanda Sykes, Lisa Lampanelli, Whitney Cummings, Natasha Leggiero, Amy Schumer, Marina Franklin, Rachel Feinstein, Nikki Glaser, Sarah Silverman... and that's just standup. Then there's Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, Kristen Wiig, Maya Rudolph, Melissa McCarthy, Jane Lynch, Ellen Degeneres, Mindy Kaling, and a bunch of others that will come to me when I'm not actually writing this off the top of my head. That's not to even mention the greats like Joan Rivers, Lucille Ball, Mary Tyler Moore, all the Golden Girls (Bea Arthur, Betty White, Estelle Getty, and Rue McClanahan), and others I'm too young to remember.
I wish this documentary had been about showing us funny women, instead of 80 minutes of existential crises. Even better would have been if this documentary had exposed me to some female comedians who I hadn't known before. Awkwardly enough, a lot of the women I mentioned above actually showed up for one- or two-minute cameos, but not nearly long enough to showcase their incredible talent.
The hardest thing is that, in the end, this expose-of-sorts didn't even bolster its own cause. It was unfocused, unfunny, and her husband Rich Vos was awkwardly omnipresent. There's already too many men in this documentary as it is.
This is my third go at reviewing this film. It came after rewatching it, and now I finally get it.
This is a masterpiece. This is Ang Lee's best film, and he has made many good films. This is 2005's best films and one of the best of the decade. It is probably the most socially significant American movie of the decade.
I admit, though, that the first time I saw it, I didn't like it. It wasn't that I was expecting too much from it, but that I was expecting the wrong things. I expected it to be more sensational than it was. At the same time, I didn't understand the characters' positions, sexually and socially, as I am able to now. So I said it seemed "off," and that it was too long and slow.
I take it all back. This film is perfect. It is an intense gay romance, and yet it really holds back in what it shows us. The sex scenes are not graphic, the story is not "pro-gay," and political/social agendas seem to be absent. In fact, the film does not concern itself with the gay agenda at all. It is invested in its characters, who happen to be gay and in love with each other. And this makes the movie a hundred times more of a knockout than it would ever be if it climbed upon a platform and spewed hate messages against homophobes.
The performances are perfect. Everyone deserved their nominations, and Anne Hathaway was robbed when she was the only one of the four main stars left out of the Oscar pool. The story was intense and involving, and the ending is a real tearjerker.
So if you watched this once and didn't like it, please watch it again. Most likely you'll be in the same boat as me, and you'll change your 5- and 6-star votes to 10-stars.
This is a masterpiece. This is Ang Lee's best film, and he has made many good films. This is 2005's best films and one of the best of the decade. It is probably the most socially significant American movie of the decade.
I admit, though, that the first time I saw it, I didn't like it. It wasn't that I was expecting too much from it, but that I was expecting the wrong things. I expected it to be more sensational than it was. At the same time, I didn't understand the characters' positions, sexually and socially, as I am able to now. So I said it seemed "off," and that it was too long and slow.
I take it all back. This film is perfect. It is an intense gay romance, and yet it really holds back in what it shows us. The sex scenes are not graphic, the story is not "pro-gay," and political/social agendas seem to be absent. In fact, the film does not concern itself with the gay agenda at all. It is invested in its characters, who happen to be gay and in love with each other. And this makes the movie a hundred times more of a knockout than it would ever be if it climbed upon a platform and spewed hate messages against homophobes.
The performances are perfect. Everyone deserved their nominations, and Anne Hathaway was robbed when she was the only one of the four main stars left out of the Oscar pool. The story was intense and involving, and the ending is a real tearjerker.
So if you watched this once and didn't like it, please watch it again. Most likely you'll be in the same boat as me, and you'll change your 5- and 6-star votes to 10-stars.