Confidential AI’s cover photo
Confidential AI

Confidential AI

Technology, Information and Internet

San Francisco, California 260 followers

About us

Confidential takes the friction out of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). You get fast, private, verifiable TEE infrastructure that just works. Connect Confidential to GitHub and commit. That's it. On every commit your code is reproducibly built, deployed live, cryptographically verifiable, fully private, and automatically scaled in CPU and GPU TEEs globally.

Website
https://confidential.ai
Industry
Technology, Information and Internet
Company size
2-10 employees
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Type
Privately Held

Locations

Employees at Confidential AI

Updates

  • Agents in regulated sectors usually mean picking between privacy and capability. These examples show you don't have to.

    Confidential AI just shipped code examples of Confidential Agents across Finance, Healthcare, Legal, Government and Telecom. Confidential Agents let companies in regulated sectors run agents with end-to-end privacy backed by hardware encryption. Stronger guarantees than on-prem, with off-prem convenience and tooling. Clone the examples and run them yourself. https://lnkd.in/efsgUMME

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Today we're launching Confidential Agents, the world's first verifiably private, secure agent runtime. Teams in finance, healthcare, and gov get stuck with clunky on-prem workarounds for AI tasks. Why? Because the only thing that'd protect their data in a cloud is a legal agreement. That’s not enough. Confidential Agents fixes by running both the agent and its inference inside Trusted Execution Environments. And it's all verifiable with an open source CLI. In other words, your data is encrypted in use, not just at rest and in transit, with only a 4-8% hit to token throughput. AI should be personal, and personal means private. Sign up for the Confidential Agents beta here: https://lnkd.in/ePNpH3wX Read our launch post and API docs for more: https://lnkd.in/e7gBjM5M

  • Most "private" AI isn't. It still decrypts your data where someone can see it. Our confidential inference is genuinely private. Here's how it works: Customer prompts (and their responses) are encrypted all the way from the client SDK to the inference enclave and back again. Plaintext exists in exactly two places: 1) The client device, where the prompt is composed and the response is rendered. 2) The hardware-enforced inference enclave, where the model runs. Everywhere else (the public internet, the cloud network, the load balancer, the worker node, the hypervisor, the host OS) the data is ciphertext. Nothing in between can read it. The client encrypts each prompt directly to the inference enclave's public key and decrypts the response with its own local private key. So even the load balancer routing the request never sees plaintext. Every attested component holds a certificate issued only after our open source Attestation Service verifies its hardware signature and code measurement. Hardware-rooted trust, not a pinky promise. What this means for the trust boundary: - The cloud provider is excluded. - The hypervisor is excluded. - The host OS is excluded. - Confidential AI itself is excluded. Your data is observable as plaintext only inside your device and the enclave. For teams running sensitive operational, financial, or personal data, this is the deployment model that actually holds up. Same for anyone who needs demonstrable in-country-equivalent guarantees for legal or regulatory reasons. Confidential inference. Encrypted end to end. Verified by hardware.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Today we are sunsetting the moon and shipping a new logo. The moon was a placeholder. An emoji. The fastest way to ship a mark, and it fit our old name, Lunal. Now we are Confidential. The moon needed an upgrade. Our new logo is a redacted bar inside square brackets. [██] You can read it in a few different ways, all valid. As a glyph. Redacted text inside brackets implies something is there but you cannot see it. Not deleted but private. Present, in use, deliberately withheld from view. That is confidential computing in one image. As code. Square brackets index into memory. The thing inside is a buffer. The bar is its contents. A buffer whose contents are opaque to everything outside it is a TEE. The logo is a picture of protected memory. As text. It is typeable. [██] renders in a terminal, a commit message, a Slack channel, a CLI prompt. Most logos die the moment they leave the brand folder. This one survives in plaintext. Grep-able. Whiteboard-able. Degrades to ASCII without losing meaning. It is not a padlock. It is not a shield. It is not a vault. Every other company in security reaches for those. They all mean: trust us, we will protect you. Ours is different. The contents are not protected by us. The contents are cryptographically unreachable. That is the entire point of hardware-enforced confidential computing, and now it is the logo.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Our CTO Amean Asad spoke about confidential inference at scale for frontier AI at the AViD workshop yesterday. Thanks for hosting FAR.AI and the Center for AI Safety.

    View organization page for FAR.AI

    28,248 followers

    How do you verify what an AI system is actually doing, from training through deployment? That question brought researchers and engineers together on May 17 for the Assurance & Verification of AI Development (AViD) Workshop, co-hosted by FAR.AI and the Center for AI Safety. The technical foundations for AI assurance are still being built. As AI capabilities advance, the infrastructure for monitoring, auditing, and verifying these systems has to advance with them. AViD focused on the concrete use cases driving this work: domestic auditing, international treaty verification, and internal oversight for AI developers. Sources of trust spanned existing hardware (TEEs, hardware root of trust), novel hardware, and cryptographic methods. Will Hodgkins (Center for AI Safety) opened and closed the day. Lightning talks featured: ▸ Shahin Tajik (Worcester Polytechnic Institute), physical verification against nation-state adversaries ▸ Koen van der Veen (OpenMined), PySyft v2 for auditing private models and user logs ▸ Bing-Jyue Chen (UIUC), efficient zero-knowledge proofs for AI inference ▸ Roy Rinberg (Harvard University), inference verification in a TEE ▸ Adam Chlipala (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), end-to-end formal verification of computing infrastructure ▸ Amean Asad (Confidential AI), scalable private inference for frontier AI ▸ quintus K. (Flashbots), trust in silicon ▸ Ari Juels (Cornell University), security tools from crypto for AI The open questions surfaced throughout the day point to where this field needs to go next: making inference replay production-ready, operationalizing memory challenges to prevent unauthorized inference, scaling zero-knowledge proofs to frontier LLMs, verifying training at frontier scale, and establishing trust in verification infrastructure itself. Rapid progress toward models capable of causing catastrophic harm makes responsible development more urgent than ever. Independent verification gives society the information it needs to respond and adapt. FAR.AI is committed to advancing the technical work that makes AI safety real. Thank you to all the speakers and attendees moving this forward. Recordings to come in the coming weeks; follow FAR.AI to catch them. What verification challenge feels most pressing to you? Let us know in the comments.

  • Confidential AI reposted this

    Today, my team at Confidential AI published the whitepaper for Kettle: Attested Builds. It is a technique we invented to answer a question every software consumer should ask: how do you know the binary you're running matches the source it claims to come from? Conventional builds answer with process. CI logs, signed checksums, release notes. None of it is cryptographic evidence. A compromised build runner can ship a clean source commit and a backdoored binary, and you'd never know. The technique: Run the build inside a TEE. Capture a hardware-signed attestation of the pipeline, inputs, and outputs. Staple it to the artifact. The result: Provenance down to the git commit. The trust surface contracts from "the entire build infrastructure and everyone with access to it" to "the CPU vendor root." Kettle is open source. Emits SLSA v1.2 provenance, verifiable in one signature check against AMD or Intel. Authors: André Arko Amean Asad Paper: https://lnkd.in/e6_3cRWg Code: https://lnkd.in/eT3ECAGU

  • Confidential computing for Kubernetes, without rethinking the control plane. The C8s whitepaper is out.

    Today my team at Confidential published the whitepaper for C8s, a confidential Kubernetes architecture. C8s solves the three-body problem for AI that I've written about previously, targeting Kubernetes - the most popular framework for deploying AI workloads. The three-body problem in short: sensitive workloads on shared infrastructure create competing confidentiality needs that can't easily be met all at once. Artifact owners want to protect model weights, datasets, and code from the infrastructure they run on. Compute providers want to run those workloads without the cloud operator seeing them. End users in healthcare, legal, financial, and national security contexts want their inputs and outputs hidden from everyone except the code processing them. C8s is built on hardware Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) - AMD SEV-SNP, Intel TDX, and NVIDIA Confidential Computing - to establish an attestation-rooted trust boundary around confidential VMs. It is compatible with managed Kubernetes services like Amazon EKS, Google GKE, and Microsoft AKS, where the control plane cannot be attested. C8s gives all groups cryptographic privacy guarantees, not contractual ones. https://lnkd.in/d_A8pHGB

Similar pages