Concord - 6002 - Imperial Rome at War
Concord - 6002 - Imperial Rome at War
The armies of Imperial Rome, and the 500-year history of the empire which they won and defended, are the shared foundation of the whole Western military tradition.
There is no simple explanation for the access of vigour through which a nation rises to seize its historical hour of dominance; we can never know "why", but can sometimes puzzle over the "how". In the 8th Century BC Rome was an obscure village guarding a river crossing in north-east Italy. She threw off Etruscan rule in the 6th Century, and herself dominated the whole Italian peninsula by the mid-3rd Century. Between the 260s and 140s BC she destroyed the great western Mediterranean empire of Carthage, and came to dominate Greece, Asia Minor and Egypt. By 120 AD Rome's rule extended from the Atlantic almost to the Caspian, from northern England to southern Iraq. Despite catastrophic setbacks she remained the single strongest power in the Western world, and its only "modern" military machine, until the early 5th Century AD. She achieved this record, unique in history, with an army which until the 4th Century never exceeded about 320,000 infantry and 60,000 cavalry.
We have no scope here to do more than touch briefly upon the organisation and character of that army; but its essential differences from those of the other peoples of the day are simply stated. The Roman legionary was the first soldier in Western history, and the only true soldier in a world of warriors or, at best, short-term mercenaries. He was a professional, long-service infantryman, paid wages by the state; and serving that state, wherever it sent him, in the ranks of permanent tactical units of uniform strength and organisation. He received uniform armour, field equipment and weapons, and was uniformly trained in their use. He was led by professional officers following a uniform career structure - the centurions, that unique pool of fighting men who provided Rome with her invaluable continuity of experienced combat leadership.
The legionary was the luxury afforded by an enormously rich mercantile state, whose centralised, bureaucratic government invested its surplus revenues in a military machine deSigned to increase its territory and wealth. The legionary's enemies were, almost invariably, tribal warriors - pastoral or agricultural peoples for whom warfare could only be intermittent. They had no command structure or culture of discipline beyond temporary personal loyalty to a chieftain; no state resources, and thus no consistent standard of equipment or functioning logistics; no systematic tactical training; no systems of communication or coordinated control. Personal courage, strength and numbers could not outweigh these handicaps when faced by a professional army fighting under circumstances of its own chooslnq. The legions did not always enjoy this choice, however; and from the 3rd Century onwards they were increasingly forced to respond to the enemy's initiative, with increasingly dispiriting results.
We choose to limit the scope of this book to the period from the mid- 1 st Century BC (before which we have too little evidence to even attempt realistic reconstructions), until the late 4th Century AD (after which the character of the Imperial army, already degraded, changed out of all recognition).
The Legion
The essential background to understanding the commentaries on the individual plates is the basic nature of the Roman legion.
The army of the Republic, up to the late 2nd Century BC, was raised annually, partly by a levy of Roman citizens meeting a minimum property qualification, and partly from allied peoples fulfilling treaty obligations. The citizen levy was organised in "legions" - units between 4,000 and 5,000 strong. Each was divided internally, by age and standard of equipment, into three classes of heavy infantry and a fourth class of light skirmishers, plus some 300 aristocratic cavalry. Each legion was also divided
into 60 tactical sub- units or "centuries", led by elected officers - "centurions"; two centuries formed a "maniple".
Citizen levies, enlisted temporarily and providing their own equipment, served Rome's needs for short local campaigns; but not for aggressive wars of expansion, or for establishing garrisons, on distant fronts. From about 100 BC the dictator Gaius Marius began a major programme of reforms; these led directly to the very different army organised by the first emperor, Augustus Caesar, in the aftermath of the long civil wars from which he emerged supreme in 30 AD.
The early Imperial legion was nominally some 5,500 strong, composed of a single class of heavy armoured infantrymen (aport from 120 cavalry scouts and messengers). It was divided into ten "cohorts" about 480 strong, each of six centuries of about 80 men; from the mid- 1 st Century AD the elite First Cohort in each legion was increased to around 800 men in five doublesize centuries. Centuries and cohorts were led by centurions, now promoted from the ranks on merit.
The legionary recruit had to be a citizen - a civic status steadily extended outwards from the heartland to embrace first all Italians, and later men from various provinces of the empire. He signed on for 25 years' salaried service, with the hope of bonuses marking important victories, the accession of a new emperor, etc.; and the promise of a generous discharge gratuity or land grant. These land grants were made in "colonies", settlements planted in the provinces, to increase the Romanisation of the empire. The army became an attractive career for the poorer classes of Italy and, later, the older provinces such as Gaul, Spain, Dalmatia, etc.
Under Augustus there were initially 28 legions; some were wiped out, some disbanded in disgrace, some raised as replacements, but the usual number at any period was around 30 - never more than 33 or less than 25. Each legion had a number, and many had names - recalling the emperor who raised them, regions where they had been raised or had served, or various honorifics; extra titles were sometimes added to honour distinguished service, e.g. Martia Victrix, "victorious in war". Because Augustus's army was formed from the contending civil war armies the numbers were often duplicated: e.g. there were three distinct "Third Legions" - III Augusta, III Gallica and III Cyrenaica. Several legions were named Gem/no "twinned", indicating amalgamation of two earlier legions; other notable titles include Legio VI Ferrata (roughIY,"the iron legion"), and Legio XII Fulminata (roughly,"the lightning-bolts").
At around the end of the chaotic 3rd Century the classic legions seem largely to have been broken up, rationalising the practical results of years of improvisation under pressure. Many "vexillations" - detachments - had been stripped away from the legions based around the frontiers, to support the claims of pretenders to the throne or to resist attacks on other provinces, often never to return. Both the much weakened rump legions and their distant detachments - averaging perhaps 1 ,000 men - seem to have been given formal identity "in place" as legions, many serving henceforward with the new mobile field armies.
The Evidence
The reconstructions shown in this book are based upon the standard interpretations of various types of evidence - sculptures, mosaics and wall- paintings; archaeological finds; and written sources. The reader must always bear in mind, however, that surviving evidence is sparse, fragmentary, and seldom closely datable; it usually lacks context, and its interpretation even by the most scholarly authorities is often little more than educated guesswork. The subject of the Imperial Roman army - like all ancient history - is like a jigsaw puzzle with a thousand pieces; we have found ten or twenty pieces, one or two of which seem to fit together, here and there - but the exact context of most of our individual discoveries remains more or less mysterious.
During the 50s BC the political adventurer G.Julius Caesar, entrusted by the Senate with command of an army of up to 11 legions, proved himself a brilliant and ruthless general in a series of almost genocidal victories over the unruly tribes of central and northern Gaul (modern France and Belgium).
Roman infantry tactics seem to have been fairly straightforward; they were successful because they were coordinated, under central command, by drilled and disciplined soldiers. Most of their enemies were strong, brave, but individualistic warriors who lacked any effective command and control, or any culture of co-ordinated obedience. They were therefore vulnerable to confusion, and seldom able to react quickly to changing circumstances.
The legionaries fought in blocks of sub-units, the basic block apparently a pair of centuries (the "maniple"), the subunits drawn up in three distinct lines. As the first line advanced to the attack the front few ranks threw pilo- javelins with long iron shanks, which bent or broke from the shaft on impact and could not be thrown back. They then closed with the enemy in tight ranks, semi-crouching, left shoulders braced against their shields, protected against downward blows by their helmets and mailed shoulders, on their blind side and against spear thrusts by their shields - which could also be used to hit and shove. Their enemies typically used slashing weapons of soft iron; the legionary stabbed upwards round the edge of his shield with the point of his short Spanish- style g/odius sword (though its edge was also deadly - we read of severed arms and heads).
Legionaries were drilled to change their frontage in battle as events dictated, with rear sub-units moving out and forward to double the line; or contracting the line by falling back and inwards into deeper blocks. Most critically, however, they were trained to relieve one another after a few moments' fighting, by ranks within the maniple and by units. At the signal - presumably a trumpet call - the units engaged would temporarily contract or open up lanes in their frontage,
Plato I
the next line pressing forward between them: exact details are unknown, but the effect was certainly that tired men feli back and fresh men stepped forward into their places. This manoeuvre alone requiring impressive discipline, confidence and timing when in hand-to-hand combat - multiplied their effective strength, against a compacted enemy mass whose (rapidly tiring) front edge alone could actually bring weapons to bear.
Here a unit of Julius Caesar's army fight off a Gallic sortie against their siege works. The front rank tires; a centurion shouts for relief, and the next rank move up to throw javelins over their comrades' heads, to win a moment's respite for the change-over. Evidence for the equipment of Julian period legionaries is very scarce; it suggests an evolved combination of Graeco-Etruscan and Celtic styles. Celtic-style ring mail shirts had doubled shoulder reinforcements, sometimes decorated in Greek fashion; plumed bronze helmets were of so-called "Montefortino" shape, tall-domed with shortneckguards and large cheekguards; the big plywood scutum shield, with a central spine and boss, was of "wraparound" oval shape; the g/odius had a broad-shouldered blade with a long tapering point.
Traditionally, legionaries are depicted in red tunics; in fact, recent analysis of the sparse evidence strongly suggests that white was the usual colour, with centurions perhaps wearing red - this latter is little more than guesswork, but we choose to follow it throughout most of these plates.
In 31 BC his kinsman Octavianus emerged as unchallenged victor of the long civil wars which followed the assassination of the dictator Julius Caesar; and in 27 BC he took the title Augustus, becoming in fact if not in name the first emperor. His reign saw his soldier stepsons Drusus and Tiberius (his heir) succeed him in leading vigorous campaigns of imperial expansion - and crushing the many consequent and bitter uprisings - in Spain, the Alps, the Balkans, Hungary and Germany.
Marius's reforms a hundred years before had turned the legion into a uniformly equipped brigade of heavy infantry at the cost of stripping it of its previously integral light skirmisher and cavalry elements. These necessary "auxiliary" troops were now hired en masse for particular campaigns from among border peoples; led by their own chiefs, who were given Roman officer status, they provided their own weapons and gear - but they took home with them more knowledge of the Roman army than was always wise.
Augustus seems to have planned final north-eastern frontiers on the River Elbe and the Carpathians, well beyond the Rhine and Danube, and many German tribes submitted to client status in 11-9 BC. But their resistance was far from broken; and in 9 AD three ROman legions under Quinctilius Varus suffered catastrophic defeat somewhere near modern Osnabruck at the hands of Cherusci tribesmen from the Weser basin, led by a chief and former auxiliary officer named Arminius.
After a season's campaigning towards the Elbe Varus was lured, in wet autumn weather, into the forbidding maze of the Teutoburg Forest. On narrow paths through primeval swampforest the Romans' normally sophisticated column of march broke down; when they were exhausted and disoriented their treacherous guides, and many local auxilia who were supposedly guarding flanks and rear, turned on them at the head of the tribesmen lurking in ambush. In thick woodland, unable to form ranks properly for battle and attacked from all sides, the army was broken up and hunted to destruction in a
wretched running fight. Legio XVII, XVIII and XIX were wiped out, the wounded and captured dragged away to hideous deaths or lifelong slavery; Varus preferred suicide on the field to death by torture. In one battle Rome suffered the destruction of 12 per cent of her professional army, a serious blow to her confidence, and the encouragement of all her other enemies and restless subjects. Never again would Romans try to conquer Germany; the Rhine valley remained the frontier - periodically threatened by tribal pressure from the east.
The Augustan legionary's kit had changed in small but noticeable ways over the last 50 years. Gallic helmet types had been taken into use and developed. The left and centre legionaries here wear the simple low-domed bronze "Coolus". shaped rather like a reversed jockey cap, with a small flat neckguard and added browguard. The veteran selling his life dearly with his dolabra pickaxe has one of the first models of the splendid headpiece called by historians "Imperial Gallic" (compare with Gallic chief in centre of Plate 1), which would be perfected in Rhineland smithies over the next century or more. Over their ringmaillegionaries now wore two crossed, metal-plated belts supporting the sword on the right hip (an inexplicably awkward position for drawing, but retained for another 200 years), and a dagger on the left. The plywood shield, protected by a leather cover on the march, was now of "wrap- around clipped oval" shape, cut straight at the top and bottom; it would soon be seen alongside the more familiar "wrap-around rectangular" type.
Nearly 20 years after the Emperor Claudius ordered the invasion of Britain in 43 AD, the north-western half of the island remained free. Nero's reign saw the governor Suetonius Paulinus campaigning against the hill tribes of Wales, climaxing in a crossing of the Menai Strait to storm Anglesey island, the stubbornly-defended holy place of the Druidic cult. With proper planning and preparation the legions and auxiliaries could successfully carry out even such a perilous operation as an opposed beach landing - though if caught in the open on the march by superior numbers they remained vulnerable.
With Legio XlIII Gemina and XX Valeria far off in Wales, Queen Boudicca of the Iceni tribe led a mass uprising in East Anglia which wiped out a large part of Legio IX Hispana on the march. The tribes destroyed Colchester and London, nearly forcing the abandonment of Britain before the Gemina and Valeria won a final desperate victory near St.Albans in 61 AD.
Here legionaries hurl their pila javelins (note this leadweigt:1ted version, left) as they wade ashore. They wear the new articulated plate cuirass (today called the "Corbridge" type, after a famous archaeological find). Though probably far from general issue yet, fragmentary finds prove it was worn fairly early in the British campaigns.
This ingenious lorica segmentata was presumably adopted to give better protection when fighting tall Western Celtic tribesmen using long slashing swords. Of 40 separate smoothly overlapping iron plates rivetted to internal strapping, it was flexible and well-balanced (though the flimsy hinges often broke, and the neck plates fitted uncomfortably) .
Tombstones show centurions and standard-bearers (left and right background) retaining ringmail or scale armour. Centurions also wore greaves; and transverse crests - note his "Imperial Gallic" helmet, now fully developed into a handsome, enveloping design with a deep neckguard, often decorated with bronze bosses and reeding, and interestingly
Plate 3
retaining the embossed "eyebrows" of its Celtic model. Unlike legionaries, centurions wore their swords on the left; all swords - by now the parallel-sided "Pompeii" model with a short point
- were slung from baldrics. A single waistbelt supported a
dagger, and for legionaries a groin-apron of studded straps; surviving decorated weapons and fittings show that soldiers enjoyed freedom to display their relative wealth by the quality of their kit.
The signifer, wearing a bear's pelt over his special helmet with a pointed peak (and a detachable full-face metal mask for parades), earned double pay as the senior of the century's three "NCOs"; the others were the optio (see Plate 4), and the tesserarius, perhaps an "orderly sergeant" Standards were venerated, and their bearers risked their lives in the forefront of battle to inspire the troops. No standardbearer is listed at cohort level (though the cohort may have had other kinds of insignia); most known examples bear from one to six metal discs - presumably the century's number within the cohort - and other decorations, like this Capricorn image, perhaps an emperor's Zodiacal sign.
We copy this signum from the tombstone of a signifer of Legio XliII; and from another the shield blazon, the only one clearly identified to a specific unit - there is evidence that legions bore identifying shield blazons, though colours are guesswork. Signifers are shown with oval or round shields smaller than the wrap-around rectangular or "clipped oval" scutum shown carried by legionaries.
Legionaries assault a Judaean city. c.67 AD
J udaea (modern Israel) had become a Roman client state in Augustus's reign; seized as a province by Claudius, it was always prone to rebellion. Between c.66 and 73 AD a large Roman army was engaged against Jewish patriot forces; initially under the able general Vespasianus, it was later led - when he made his successful bid for the throne in 69 - by his son Titus. This long, savage war involved the siege and storming of several walled cities and other strongholds; the battles for Jerusalem and Masada are well-known epics.
Rome's expertise in siege warfare - based directly on much older Greek equipment and methods - far outclassed that of any enemy (except perhaps the Sassanid Persians) that she ever fought. The assembly of huge amounts of material; the methodical construction, by thousands of men, of vast works - surrounding ramparts, mines under walls, mobile galleries and battering rams, towers, approach ramps; the steady contraction, over months or even years; the final assault, and pitiless massacre - this type of operation suited the Roman character perfectly, and was virtually irresistible.
"Artillery" was issued to each legion: one light arrowshooting "scorpion" per century, and one heavy stonethrowing ballista per cohort, giving the legion some 70 catapults of a range of sizes - tile measurement determining "calibre" was the diameter of the bronze washers clamping the ends of the twisted sinew or hair springs in which the arms of these giant crossbows were set. Artillery was massed together to lay down "battery fire" (for both sieges and openfield battles). The ballistae threw stones of anything between 2lbs. and a massive 601bs. weight out to at least 150 yards; while they battered the walls, the heavy wooden-flighted scorpio bolts swept defenders off the ramparts from up to 300 yards' range.
Here a scorpio crew reload at the critical moment, to "shoot in" an assault party charging a breach in the famous locked-shields testudo 'formation used for advancing inside the range of enemy missiles. One man winds back the sliding bolt-trough with the bowstring clamped to its rocking trigger
Plate 4
mechanism. His helmet is a so-called "Imperial Italic" type: often of bronze, and of poorer quality than the "Imperial Gallic" types, it generally resembles them except in lacking their characteristic "eyebrow" embossing and in having a round, slotted crest fixture. It had been thought that the articulated plate cuirass was not used in the East (where legionaries did not face tall Celtic enemies with long slashing swords), until fragments were found at Gamala in Israel, a contemporary battle site. Both ringmail and bronze or tinned scale armour were certainly still worn by some legionaries in the 60s - as were old-fashioned helmets like the "jockey cap" worn by the soldier shouting for more ammunition.
Beyond the crew an ootio. the centurion's second-incommand in each century, is identified by his helmet sideplumes and long knobbed staff. These "NCOs" received at least half again, and perhaps double, a legionary's annual pay of 225 silver denarii. Soldiers of this period were paid three times a year; in the 80s Domitianus increased the rate to 300 denarii paid in four instalments - though soldiers actually received much less, after "deductions at source" against the cost of food, weapons, kit replacement, compulsory payments towards burial clubs and various other unit funds. The century standard-bearer also supervised the banking of part of a legionary's pay against his retirement.
A Ithough the Varus disaster effectively ended Roman ~ambitions to occupy Germany beyond a narrow buffer zone east of the Rhine, there were many later campaigns involving temporary thrusts into "free Germany". The reign of Domitianus saw fierce fighting in the Taunus hills against the Chatti tribe of, roughly, modern Hesse-Cassel; such campaigns were ruthlessly pursued, with fast-moving columns destroying tribal villages and food resources.
By this period most auxiliaries served in regular units organised on Roman lines under Roman and provincial officers. Recruited for 25 years' service from among noncitizens, and paid less than legionaries, auxiliaries received on discharge the important privilege of citizenship for themselves and their descendants. The elite were the cavalry alae ("wings"); Rome, having no cavalry traditions, always employed troopers from horse-breeding areas such as Spain, Gaul, Thrace and North Africa. The usual ala quingenaria seems to have had about 500 men in 16 turmae (troops) of about 32 men; by about 110 AD there were some 75 of these regiments. From the mid-1 st century AD a few crack alae mil/iariae were added - only nine are known, never more than one stationed in any province - comprising 24 troops, about 800 men.
Alae bore numbers and/or names referring to the peoples from whom they were raised, and sometimes the emperor at the time of raising; a few kept the name of their first commander; brave or loyal service could add further conventional phrases, until the title became long and complex. A simple example was Ala I Augusta Thracum (" 1 st Thracian Horse, raised under Augustus"); but the elite unit in Britain was the Ala Augusta Gal/orum Petriana mil/iaria civium Romanorum bis torquato ("Petrus's Gallic Horse, raised under Augustus, a thousand strong, awarded block Roman citizenship, twice decorated"). The unit standard was a vexil/um, a flag on a staff and crossbar.
Horses were small, mostly 13 or 14 hands high, probably ungelded stallions; note here simple geometric brands on
shoulder and rump. Snaffle and curb bits and hackamores have been found, as have prick-spurs. The saddle, copied from a Gallic Celtic model. had four bronze-stiffened horns; despite the lack of stirrups experiments show that it gave enough support for thrusts and blows with spear and sword. Tombstones show troopers with oval or hexagonal shields, stabbing overarm or thrusting underarm with a short lance. A description survives of training with javelins, the troopers riding in sequence and throwing several at a target before wheeling away; there is mention of a quiver to carry these, and we reconstruct it here in a logical position. The cavalry sword, spatha, resembled the legionary's gladius but was up to three feet long.
Ringmail and scale cuirasses are shown in sculptures, the former often with Celtic-style reinforcing capes, or shoulderdoublings as in Plates 1-3; one carving (see background figure) even shows a ringmail shirt worn with the upper section of a legionary lorica segmentata reinforcing the vulnerable shoulders. Carvings show calf-length breeches worn beneath the tunic. Recovered and carved cavalry helmets basically resemble the legionary shape, but without browguards; with cheekguards covering the ears; and very often with more or less elaborate decorative chasing, silver-gilt skinning, medallions, etc. - locks of "hair" over the skull were popular. Owners' inscriptions scratched on some suggest that although elaborate, these were not officers' helmets.
A Praetorian Cohort on the Danube front. c.88 AD
In 85-88 AD several costly campaigns on the Danube front occupied the Emperor Domitianus; the Dacians (from modern Transylvania) overran the province of Moesia (roughly, northern Bulgaria/eastern Yugoslavia), inflicting heavy losses before his legions drove them back, He was accompanied at the front by part of the Praetorian Guard - the elite bodyguard force (then of ten large ten-century cohorts) normally stationed in Rome,
The Praetorians, recruited in Italy, enjoyed many privileges: three times a legionary's pay; nearly twice his discharge gratuity after only 16 (instead of 25) years' service, spent mostly in the comfort of the capital; excellent career prospects - and occasional huge bonuses given by a new or reigning emperor to buy the Praetorians' loyalty, They understood their power to create or destroy emperors, and sometimes used it frivolously, with damaging consequences for Rome,
Here the tribune commanding a Praetorian Cohort receives a despatch from one of the Guard's cavalry component - apparently, 150 men within each 800-strong cohort, Guard tribunes were former centurions - more experienced than men of the same rank on a legion's staff, who might only have four years' service, His purple-striped tunic marks his rank; we choose to show a red cloak, perhaps from his days as a frontier centurion, Senior officers are always sculpted wearing the moulded or "muscle" cuirass copied from the ancient Greek model, over decorated protective straps (pteruges) hanging from a jerkin beneath the armour, and half-breeches, No surviving example of this "Attic" style helmet (beloved of Hollywood!) has been recovered, and its illustration is pure guesswork; but it often appears in sculpture, sometimes associated with Praetorians; and common sense and known Roman taste argue an elaborate helmet for officers,
The saluting trooper - the feather on his lance marking a despatch rider - wears a known type of cavalry helmet and conventional armour; there is sculptural evidence for the
Plate 6
hexagonal shield with a scorpion blazon (which may honour' the memory of the Emperor Tiberius, whose birth-sign it wcs) His elaborate harness decorations are from covola tombstone evidence,
The standard-bearer - like those of the legions and auxiliaries - wears ringmail, and carries a small round parma shield; the lion-pelt seems to have been a privilege 01 Praetorian standard- bearers, however, A sculpture shows the standard of III Praetorian Cohort lavishly decorated with stylised crowns, imperial images, etc" and also bearing a scorpion plaque,
Sculpture also shows Praetorians with the curved oval scutum bearing several blazons - including that illustrated· featuring moons and stars; colours are, as always, guesswork, but may have varied from cohort to cohort, Although the guardsmen wear the paenula cloak over their articulated plate cuirasses, we have shown them parading with crests fitted to their helmets, which certainly had fixtures for their attachment; as with the tunic, modern experts now believe that white is the most likely colour,
Finally, there is written and sculptural evidence for Roman soldiers wearing woollen socks under their sandals; and common sense argues that on winter campaign duty cloth or sheepskin foot-wrappings must have been worn to prevent frostbite -soldiers who could not keep up with the march were soldiers wasted,
Legionaries in combat. Second Dacian War. C.I05 AD
In 96 AD the tyrant Domitianus was assassinated; and after the brief reign of Nerva his kinsman Trajanus ascended the throne in 98. A vigorous soldier-emperor, he was to extend the empire to its greatest extent; and on Trojan's Column, his great spiral frieze monument in Rome, he left us the single finest piece of sculptural evidence for the appearance of the Roman army at its peak of glory (though interpreting the Column has divided scholars for generations).
The emphasis was now firmly on the Danube frontier, where Domitianus's campaigns had cost many casualties including the total loss of two legions (Legio V Alaudae and XXI Rapax); the threat from Dacia, temporarily averted by treaty, was the new emperor's first concern. In 101-102 he led ten legions in on offensive which ended with agreed terms and garrisons planted in Dacian territory. In 105 the warlike King Decebalus of Dacia attacked across the Danube once more; again the emperor took the field, leading a massive army with elements of no fewer than 13 legions and similar numbers of auxiliaries - probably half Rome's total available forces. Before he won final victory and incorporated Dacia into the empire his army saw hard fighting against an enemy dangerous enough to force modifications to their equipment.
Recovered helmets and sculpted evidence from a war memorial suggest that Imperial-pattern helmets and articulated cuirasses were not proof in hand-to-hand combat against the Dacians' heavy, scythe-like falx swords, and that these must have been particularly deadly when delivering sweeping blows against the arms and legs. Helmets were hastily fitted with extra crossed reinforcing bars over the skull; this style long outlasted the Dacian Wars and so may have been more or less universal. At least some legionary infantry were also issued with extra limb armour resembling that used in the gladiatorial arena - articulated plates protecting the right or both arms, greaves for the left or both shins, and extra leather pteruges. (Some are also shown at this date wearing half-breeches under their tunics, like auxiliaries - the reason is unknown.)
Plate 7
Here a Dacian charge crashes into a legionary unit. In the centre a soldier stands over a comrade hacked down with ( terrible thigh wound, and manages to dispatch his enemy ir classic style - knocking him off balance with a punching blo, from the upheld shield, and stabbing upwards round its edge into the tribesman's left ribs. At left, a legionary wearing an all bronze version of the Imperial Gallic helmet presses forward his bronze-edged plywood shield badly damaged by foil blows; note its construction - the only recovered example he three layers of wooden strips glued in alternating directions the outer layer of leather (painted here with a blazon from thE Column).
We choose to show this squad wearing mixed gear - some in the articulated "Corbridge" cuirass depicted on Trojan':
Column, some in shirts of small iron scales or ringmail, as showr on the Adamklissi memorial, some with curved rectangula shields, some with the curved "clipped oval" shape seen or other monuments - to dramatise the fact that historians havE no real idea how uniform Roman equipment was in any giver unit at any given time. Armour was presumably made bj many dispersed smiths; the modern idea of mass production to exact patterns was alien to their culture; metal equipmenl lasts for years, even decades, and would never be discardeo while still serviceable; we know that individual wealth and taste were allowed some play; so, given the inevitable transfers and replacements, a cohort might have presented c fairly mixed appearance.
Auxiliary infantry were recruited from non-Roman citizens, initially from the less civilised, more recently acquired provinces; they were commanded by Roman prefects (tribunes, for the units nominally 1,000 strong), and officered by centurions promoted from their ranks or from those of the legions. The basic unit was the infantry cohort; these served in campaign armies in at least equal numbers to the legionary infantry. They were not grouped into separate multi-cohort formations equivalent to legions; several cohorts were probably attached to each legion and came under its overall command. The cohors quingenorio comprised six centuries of 80 men each, the cohors mil/iorio, ten centuries.
Cohorts were numbered, and named for their geographic origins - at the simplest, e.g. Cohors / Noricorum, the 1st Cohort raised from the people of Noricum, roughly modern Austria. Others also bore the name of the emperor under whom they were raised (e.g. Utoia. from one of the names of Trajanus); honorific titles marking victorious service (e.g. Victrix), loyalty (e.g. Pia Fide/is), block award of Roman citizenship for distinguished service (civium Romonorum), etc. By Trajanus's reign there were about 132 quingenorioe and 18 mil/iorioe cohorts of auxiliary infantry in service.
It is usually suggested that most auxiliary foot wore ringmail armour, helmets (often bronze) broadly similar to but simpler than the legionary type, and half-breeches under the tunic. Normal swords were carried; but instead of the heavy line-of-battle legionary's pi/a javelins and large curved scutum shield, a simpler all-purpose spear (hosto) and a smaller oval shield (see Plate 10).
After serious mutinies in the 1 st century AD auxiliaries were generally posted far from their home province for many years, later recruiting locally around their stations; in many cases their particular nationality thus probably survived only in their titles. An exception seems to have been the policy of employing some units retaining traditional regional weapons (e.g. Cretan archers, slingers from the Balearic Isles); tombstones of men from cohorts of e.g. Syrian archers suggest
Plate 8
that these units with special skills were kept up to strength with drafts from home.
Always exposed in the van, rear and on the flanks of field armies, auxiliaries were used for scouting, skirmishing and screening. These three types are shown on Trojan's Column, The archer with a segmented helmet, mailshirt, long gown, and powerful Eastern composite bow, is probably from the Sarmatian lazyges people of the Black Sea coast. (Othel archers are shown in absolutely conventional auxiliary costume.) One skirmisher (right) wears a wolf-pelt over his helmet - in early Roman times, the mark of light javelin troops - and carries a shield with this blazon. Another auxiliary (background) has this legionary shield, and perhaps serves in one of the confusingly named cohortes scutotoe. (Modern experts question the clear distinction traditionally made between legionary and auxiliary armour and weapons, citing tombstone sculptures which certainly break all the "rules" 01 identification)
The dead legionary is taken from a carving at Mainz; by elimination, his shield blazon may be that of Legio / Adiutrix, originally raised from naval personnel. One interpretation also shows the "eyebrows" embossed on the carved figure's Gallic helmet extended into a fish shape. We follow this, and - quite arbitrarily - give the legionary's kit some elements of blue, the colour associated with Roman sailors; this is pure invention on our part.
Centurion and legionaries in camp. c.1 15 AD
One of the Romans' great tactical strengths was their marching discipline. They constructed an entrenched, pallisaded camp even for a one-night bivouac; the camp was of the same basic design whether for a single cohort or a legion, so trained soldiers could pitch it quickly by a practised routine, and could find their way around it even in the dark. Surveyors went ahead to select the site and layout its main lines with flags and pegs. The men marched directly to the place selected for their century's tent street - ten eight-man tents of goat leather, with a larger tent for the centurion at the end, and prescribed areas for their baggage mules and gear. Part stood guard while others stacked their kit, threw up an earth and turf rampart with spoil from an outer ditch, pallisaded it with double-ended wooden stakes, and pitched the tents.
Here two legionaries, serving under Trajanus in Armenia during his last great campaign against the Parthians, help each other take off their armour - the articulated cuirass came off like a jacket once the front thongs and buckles were unfastened; and note the felt-lined helmet at their feet. Their comrade, stripped to his tunic but always wearing his dagger belt (the belt, and the consequent hitching up of the tunic above the knees, was the proud mark of the soldier) prepares the evening meal; the basic campaign ration was grain, cooked into a porridge or baked into rough loaves by the campfire, but vegetables and meat would be added where they could be gathered or bought locally.
The duty centurion exercising his humour on the cook wears dazzling full-dress uniform, and gallantry decorations (phalerae) displayed on a harness over the silvered scale armour appropriate to his wealth. The graded career structure of the professional junior officers was another "modern" feature of the army, up to that time unique in the world, and an important foundation of Rome's military prowess. Each of the legion's 59 centuries (including the five double-size centuries of the elite First Cohort) was commanded by a centurion, usually a ranker promoted
Plate 9
through the "NCO" grades, but sometimes a "direct entry' officer through family influence - even Roman equestrians, the lower class of propertied gentry, sometimes chose this career path for its good prospects rather than trying to secure a post as an auxiliary unit commander. It was no job for a weak or squeamish man - centurions enforced their authority freely with blows of their vinesticks, and routinely exacted bribes to let soldiers off fatigues; but they were the professional backbone of the empire, long-service veteran! who led the troops in battle by personal example. Their ran~ has no modern equivalent but, roughly, they filled the posts held today by all ranks from senior sergeants up to lieutenant· colonels, moving up through the numbered cohorts of a legion by promotion into vacancies. Above the senior centurion of the First Cohort (primipilus, "first spear") the 5,5OG man legion had only a handful of staff tribunes, most of them with between four and eight years' service, and the commanding officer (/egatus) himself.
Centurions' pay was generous, starting at five times a soldier's annual rate (1,500 silver deticuii. compared to 300); the primi ordines, centurions of the First Cohort, drew ten times a soldier's pay, and the "first spear" 20 times. If they lived to collect, their discharge bonuses could be huge: unds Caligula (c.40 AD) that of a primipilus was 150,000 denarii, equal to hundreds of years' pay for a legionary - but at any time there were only about 30 of these supremely experienced soldiers serving with the legions. Centurions often transferred between legions; many desirable staff jobs were open to senior grades, as were major civil service posts after retirement, which could lift a whole family into the monied ruling classes.
Auxiliaries of a Cohors Equitata in action. Northern Britain. c.118 AD
Offensive operations in Britain ended with Julius Agricola's victory in 84 AD in north-east Scotland; but with the withdrawal of troops for Domitianus's Danube campaigns plans to occupy Scotland (Caledonia) were abandoned, and a chain of forts across the country roughly from modern Carlisle to Newcastle marked - in Roman minds - their border. It was often disturbed, by both attacks from the north and risings to the south; and there was a serious outbreak in 117- 118.
In such operations much of the fighting was normally done by auxiliary units; even in pitched battles the legionaries were often held back as a reserve. Indeed, we read of one hard-fought victory achieved "without Roman casualties" - meaning that the auxiliaries did all the fighting and paid the whole butcher's bill.
Apart from the cavalry ala and the infantry cohors (see Plates 5 and 8) there was a third type of auxiliary unit, also listed in two sizes, roughly 600 or roughly 1,000 strong: the mixed cohors equitata. At least 130 of the total of some 280 auxiliary cohorts were of this type - usefully versatile for warfare in all kinds of terrain and, with their longer "reach", for patrolling from frontier outposts. The cohors equitata quingenaria probably had six 80-man centuries of foot and four 32-man turmae (cavalry troops); and the milliaria equivalent, ten centuries and eight troops.
In battle the foot and horse components probably fought separately, the infantry and cavalry of several units being brigaded together for tactical purposes. The troopers of mixed cohorts were paid less than those of the alae; there is evidence that while their horses and gear were of lower quality, they had the same weapons and fought according to the same drills. Basic weapons were the dual-purpose spear and light javelins; and while there were some specifically named archer units, it seems that at least some men in all units were trained with the bow.
Among the auxiliaries shown on Trajan's Column, wearing the usual ringmail. and short breeches beneath their tunics,
are one trooper and one foot soldier carrying shields with th( same blazon, but that of the trooper with an extra "spine" perhaps a strengthening bar; we show the blazon here in USE by a mixed cohort. The infantry, armed with the cuxlllorv' hasta fighting spear rather than the legionary's pilum, catct their breath after successfully driving their Celtic enemies of the crest of a slope; the troopers - note the turma standard ride pass their flank to exploit forwards. All wear bronze helmets, simpler than the legionary type; examples with the "post-Dacian" crossed reinforcement have been found Auxiliaries' tombstones show standard legionary- style sword and dagger-belts with aprons.
We copy the design of the century's standard (and thE bearer's wolf-pelt with the mask cut off, perhaps peculiar tc ouxllioriesv) from one of an Asturian cohort from northerr Spain. Another such unit - Cohors II Asturum Equitato honoured for loyal service in Domitianus's reign with the additional title Pia Fidelis Domitiana - served in Britain around this period. One reference suggests that men in that region traditionally wore black; without evidence, we have chosen to show them wearing that colour (though it seems unlikelj that regional distinctions would survive long service abroad).
The centurion might be a promoted former legionary I whose next step up, if he is lucky and successful, will be to d centurion's post in a legion. We show our officer in conventional, if rather plain centurion's costume; no specific differences for auxiliary centurions are known.
In 117 Trajanus was succeeded by his nephew and former staff officer Hadrianus; as energetic as his predecessor, he concentrated not on expansion but on consolidation. He travelled tirelessly around the imperial frontiers, supervising the construction of lines of strategic defence. Rome had always built frontier forts between campaigns; now they appeared in mutually supporting chains along borders which were intended to be permanent. On the border of Britannia and Caledonia he even built the unique, 70-mile continuous stone wall which today bears his name. Though Rome launched many further offensives, Hadrianus's reign marks an ominous change towards a basically defensive posture, under steadily growing pressures.
Most public works in frontier provinces were carried out by the legions themselves. They built the roads they marched on, and the forts they garrisoned. The ranks included many skilled specialists of all kinds, from clerks and surveyors to smiths and masons; and although such soldiers did not all earn extra pay they enjoyed the status of immunes - men excused routine fatigues.
Fort ramparts were initially made of earth dug from an outer defensive ditch, piled on a rubble or timber foundation, and walled front and rear with piled turfs; they stood about ten feet high, with a timber parapet protecting a broad wallwalk adding about another six feet. Gatehouses and corner and interval watchtowers were of timber. (By Trajanus's reign some older forts were already being rebuilt with stone-faced ramparts.) Inside were barracks, stores, headquarters, etc. for (usually) a single cohort, either quingenaria or mil/iaria. Fort design is discussed in more detail elsewhere in this book.
Here, Hadrianic legionaries have almost finished the main defences of a cohort fort in the hills of the military zone of northern Britain - which was seldom peaceful for long, given the links between tribes such as the Selgovae and Novantae in free Caledonia, and the irreconcilable Brigantes of the occupied zone. It is significant that such a small province had a garrison of three legions (Legio /I Augusta at Caerleon in
Plate I I
south Wales; XX Valeria Victrix at Chester in the westerr midlands; and IX Hispana, later VI Victrix, at York controltn; the north-east), as well as about 20 auxiliary cavalry and fi infantry units scattered allover the north and west.
There is good evidence for Roman building methods one tools. Cranes were braced with cables and powered b) treadmills; baskets were used for carrying earth and rubble. saw-pits, much like those used until a hundred years ago were set up on site to produce planks; clay and straw wen puddled to make daub for wattle building panels.
Note the soldiers' tunics, with a wide slit at the neck; th~ was reduced for everyday wear by gathering a handful 01 the slack cloth into a knot behind the neck. For heO\fj labouring the knot was untied, and the slit was then long enough for one arm to pass through, freeing the shoulder. The optio. with his staff of rank, has tucked in his dagger belt a notebook made from smooth wooden plaques linked concertina-fashion; and carries a larger wooden tablet with an applied surface of soft wax, in which he can write with a metal stylus, smoothing the wax anew to erase his jottings. Although soldiers on campaign probably always neglected shaving - Romans did not usually carry personal razors but were shaved by barbers - in the early 2nd Century short beards became fashionable when the emperors adopted this style.
The legions normally had permanent fortresses some distance inside the frontiers, the border posts being held by auxiliary units. However, from time to time legionary detachments held such forts, sometimes sharing the larger posts with auxiliary cohorts or aloe. This could occur during long periods of active operations, when the legionaries wintered on the frontier.
"Vexillations" of a thousand men or more were often transferred from the legions' permanent bases in time of need: to reinforce a nearby frontier, to be temporarily shipped overseas to take part in a faraway campaign, or simply to help in some major engineering project. Because all 30-odd legions were spread between the provinces it was difficult to reinforce one sector in an emergency without dangerously weakening another, so assembling ad hoc "task forces" from vexillations was more common than transferring whole legions - though this, too, was done during major wars. Britain's garrison was weakened by large vexillations for the civil war of 69 AD and for the Chatti war in 84; detachments from Germany came to replace the casualties of the Boudiccan war in 61, and from Spain and Germany to help stabilise the northern frontier and build Hadrian's Wall in c.118-122. As the 2nd Century progressed units were moved steadily from the Rhine to the Danube frontier.
The great network of stone-flagged roads built by the legions allover the empire were superb strategic arteries, and legionaries - hardened by three route-marches a month even in peacetime - were renowned for their marching: 24 Roman miles (36km)a day, for hundreds of miles if need be. The legionary carried his gear lashed to a forked or T-shaped pole, resting low down behind his shoulders where it balanced well, and locked his slung shield in place. Sometimes, like the right hand man here, the pack was slung from his dolabra pickaxe instead of a pole; on the march the blade edge was covered with a bronze guard. Helmets were slung from the shoulder armour.
The basic marching kit included a cross-braced leather
Plate 12
satchel for personal effects, a bronze messtin (patera) and cooking pot, canvas or leather bags for spare clothing and grain rations, and probably a waterskin in a net bag. Since armour and weapons weighed some 45Ibs.(20kg), the total load must have approached 65Ibs.(30kg).
The legionary's standard foul-weather cloak (paenula) of thick yellow-brown wool was hooded, and fastened on the centre of the chest with buttons or toggles. Cavalry and officers wore a simpler rectangular cloak (sagum) brooched at the right shoulder.
Outside the fort was usually found a levelled parade ground, and a communal bathhouse (regarded by all Romans as a basic necessity, and used as a social club); and archaeology has also revealed quite large and well-built villages. Apart from inns for official travellers, such villages would doubtless offer shadier drinking-dens to serve the needs of the rank and file, craftsmen's workshops, smithies, trader's shops and booths, and quarters for the soldiers' unofficial families.
Roman soldiers - legionary and auxiliary - were forbidden to marry during their service, but the authorities turned a blind eye to their private arrangements with local women; soldiers' sons were retrospectively declared legitimate on their fathers' retirement and official marriage, and were encouraged to enlist in their turn. Here a pair of legionaries say their farewells in the village outside a stone-built fort in a frontier zone - perhaps they are going to man a small local police/customs post down the road: in peacetime soldiers performed many detached quasi-military duties.
Antoninus Pius occupied the throne from 138 to 161 in relative peace, apart from a major rising in North Africa and lesser ones in Egypt and Dacia, The only major operations were in Britain,
From c,140 Hadrian's Wall was virtually abandoned; its garrisons, and those in the Pennine Hills south of it, were stripped for an offensive into Scotland - probably to support the friendly Votadini tribe of the eastern Lowlands against the hostile Selgovae to their west, By 142-143 the victorious army had established a new frontier on the Clyde-Forth line, It has been calculated that the newly occupied Scottish Lowlands were held by some 13,000 men; the turf and timber" Antonine Wall" by about 6,200; and advanced screening forts north of it, by some 4,500 - a total of around 24,000 men, The region south of Hadrian's Wall - which itself no longer presented a barrier to co-operation between the tribes - was garrisoned by only about 6,800 men, They were to prove inadequate,
In 154 the Brigantes tribe of northern England - still unreconciled to the pax Romano after some 70 years of occupation - rose in strength, for behind the active military zone, and wreaked havoc, It took about two years to defeat them, at heavy loss to the legions (the general Julius Verus had to bring reinforcements for all three British legions from the armies of both German provinces), While this war raged the Antonine Wall and the Lowlands were abandoned, and forts on Hadrian's Wall and particularly in the Pennines were repaired and reoccupied,
By 158 the Antonine frontier itself was reoccupied - only to be finally abandoned in c,163: Rome could not police the tribes of northern Britannia at the same time as holding a frontier as far north as the Clyde-Forth line, Hadrian's Wall became, once more, the edge of the Roman world,
Evidence for the legionary's appearance in the mid-2nd Century is sparser than before; it seems basically as in Iroionuss day, but perhaps simpler, The deep helmet illustrated, found in Germany, is plainer in its details, The articulated cuirass (the "Newstead" type, from finds at an
important Scottish fort temporarily occupied during these campaigns by two cohorts from Legio XX Valeria Victrix and a cavalry ala) has fewer plates and much simpler fittings,
The dagger belt is now decorated with pierced plates showing the leather in cut-out patterns; the groin apron is shorter than previously; some legionaries seem to have worn half-breeches beneath their tunics, and some to have carried the auxiliary's simple fighting spear instead of the pilum - though this too was still seen, Swords with ring pommels have been dated to this period, as have new scabbard fittings; the baldric now passed round it under a bronze bracket, sometimes shaped like a dolphin - a symbol of the soul's easy passing into the Netherworld, The shield blazon illustrated - the colours of this and of the tunic are, as always, guesswork - comes from sculpture of Marcus Aurelius's reign; the design suggests a unit once formed from marines, Small iron and bronze flasks have been found on military sites in Britain and Germany; some have locking caps, suggesting that they held something more expensive than woter.i..
The trooper wears an impressive iron and bronze helmet with broad cheekguards overlapping at the chin, based on examples found in Germany and usually associated with 2nd to 3rd Century cavalry, He has prick-spurs strapped over his caligae - the famous hob-nailed sandals which shod infantry and cavalry alike, Auxiliaries, like legionaries, were often transferred in vexillations as well as in complete units, forming ad hoc regiments on campaign; many reinforcements were shipped to Britain during the wars of the 140s- 160s, If shield blazons did vary from unit to unit, then these temporary regiments must have presented a motley appearance, (In Trajanus's Parthian war of 115 a cavalry "task force" is recorded which was formed from troopers of no less than five different alae and fourteen cohortes eouitotoe.i
The reign of the philosopher-emperor Marcus Aurelius (161- 180) saw continuous fighting, as the first serious pressure built up against Rome's eastern frontiers. In the 160s the Chatti invaded across the Rhine, and the Parthians swept into Cappadocia and Syria. After prolonged campaigns these threats were turned back, but only by stripping the Danube garrisons; and soldiers returning from the East brought with them an epidemic plague which further weakened armies already suffering from shortage of manpower.
Between 169 and 175 the tribes across the Danube - the Marcomanni, Quadi, Sarmatii and others, themselves beginning to feel pressure from population movements far to their north-east - launched several major waves of attack. These wars saw Pannonia, Noricum and Raetia temporarily overrun, and some tribesmen actually crossed the Alps into northern Italy for a time. Marcus Aurelius's long campaigns won Rome a brief respite, enjoyed by his tyrannical son Commodus after he died, exhausted, in 180 AD.
Here troopers of an auxiliary frontier garrison relax after the day's duty. The barrack blocks in forts echoed the layout of tent lines in camp. Infantry barracks were partitioned to accomodate the century's ten eight-man squads, with their centurion's larger quarters at the end. Cavalry troops, half the size of infantry centuries, were probably housed two to a block; some barracks have an officer's quarters at each end, supporting this theory; and some blocks incorporate barrack rooms down one side and stables down the other.
Each squad had a pair of rooms: in the front room, opening onto a verandah, they kept their gear. the back room being the sleeping quarters. Typically these seem to have been about 18ft. by 12ft.; there is evidence for bunks, and a hearth for a fire or brazier. The plastered walls were of wattle and daub, the floor of concrete, the hearth probably cowled with a clay-and-rubble chimney breast, the roof tiled; there were small, high windows, sometimes glazed.
Archaeologists have not identified any central mess halls in forts; the squads may have eaten in their quarters - and
Plclle 14
cooked at least some of their rations there, too, although large ovens, presumably for bread, have been found dug into the inner earth slope of fort ramparts. When in garrison they enjoyed a varied diet - there is evidence for many kinds 01 meat both farmed and game, fish, shellfish, vegetables, fruit, nuts, pickles and sauces; and for men buying private supplies, including better wine than the army issue.
Their replacements being recruited locally or drafted in from various provinces, some auxiliary units must have been fairly multi-national, though presumably using basic Latin as their lingua franca. Off-duty, at least, they probably wore a mixture of the common white wool tunic and various personal garments of regional weaves. The soldier tending the hearth (who keeps his money in a bronze arm-purse) wears a tunic in a kind of basic tartan: clothing recovered from north European peat bogs, sometimes pre-dating Christ, is of good quality and often shows woven checkered or herringbone patterns. His belt has a ring-and-stud fastening, becoming popular at the end of the 2nd Century.
Behind him, playing a board game, a soldier wears a tunic with two darker vertical stripes; this was a pattern seen among civilians throughout the Roman world and over several centuries, but we have no evidence one way or the other for its use on army tunics before the late 3rd Century. Among the pottery cups and utensils on the table lies a folding claspknife.
Watching from his bunk at the right - the furthest from the draught of the door beyond the hearth, and so probably the prerogative of the squad's toughest veteran! - a scarred trooper cleans a handsome spatha with a polished bone hilt and a gilt figure of a war-god inlaid into the blade. There is sculptural evidence for his woollen socks without toes or heels, worn under the sandals.
C ommodus was assassinated in 192; for five years contenders put up by the Praetorian Guard and different frontier armies fought for the throne, until Septimius Severus emerged victorious. In 209, after a successful campaign against Parthia, he sailed for Britain; many troops had been withdrawn during the civil war, and Caledonian tribesmen had poured over the northern frontier. Severus and his son Caracalla drove them back and mounted major campaigns deep inside Scotland; but when Severus died at York in 210 Caracalla concluded a treaty and withdrew the army to strengthened positions along Hadrian's Wall. Britain - almost alone of the provinces - would have relative peace for many years.
Caracalla campaigned successfully on the Rhine and Danube frontiers, which were under pressure from a new tribal confederation, the Alamanni; but during operations against Parthia in 217 he too was assassinated. Now began 60 years of anarchy which fatally weakened the armies and ruined the economy, as an endless series of pretenders stripped the frontier garrisons, their brief reigns convulsed by endemic civil wars, mutinies, and constant barbarian invasions.
The German frontier was not defended by a continuous wall, as in Britain, but marked by a pallisade and ditch studded with watchtowers, and guarded by a chain of the usual cohort forts. Here, on a winter morning during the reign of Severus Alexander, a patrol from a cavalry unit arrive too late at the site of a breakthrough by a war party of Alamanni tribesmen.
Since 212, in the face of constant manpower shortages, the distinction between legionary and auxiliary recruiting had disappeared: henceforth all free-born men within the empire were granted citizenship, and were eligible for the legions. At the turn of the century marked changes in military costume, too, began to be seen in tombstone and other sculpture.
Most tunics now had long sleeves; and long Teutonic-style trousers were worn by legionary and auxiliary alike. The classic openwork coligo sandal seems to have been replaced by
Plate 15
more solid shoes and boots, though still with cut-out laced panels on the vamp. The hooded infantry poenu/a cloak began to give way, for all troops, to the cavalry's simple rectangular sogum, often fringed, and pinned on the righl shoulder with various brooches - the "crossbow" shape was common. The infantry also copied the cavalry in beginning to use longer spotho swords, slung now on the left, from broad baldrics with large cut-out decorative plates and terminals· disc-shaped scabbard chapes are characteristic of German finds.
Here a decurion is being shown the axe of a wounded and abandoned raider. who has just been dispatched after questioning by a local scout from an irregular tribal unil (cuneus or numerus) of the sort now increasingly attached to the overstretched frontier garrisons. The officer wears a bronze scale cuirass fastening by means of decorated chesl plates; its semi-rigid construction limits its length to the waist, for ease of hip movement, and heavy leather pteruges protect his arms and pelvis.
His heavily embossed tinned bronze helmet of "Attic' shape is copied from a recovered example from Germany. (It bears scratched owner's details: in fact, despite its apparent richness, it belonged to a common trooper, and from a lowly cohors equitoto at that: Aliquandus, in the turmo of Decurion Nonus, of the Spanish cohors I Brocorougustonorum.,,). We have therefore given his trumpeter another of several similarly elaborate examples found. For lack of any later evidence we show a cavalry shield blazon from Trajan's Column.
The 3rd Century is a notorious gap in the archaeological and sculptural record of Roman military equipment. We have a few finds - helmets, weapons and scraps of armour, very few of them closely datable; a few weathered tombstones (which typically show "undress" uniform rather than armour); and a few tiny, crude images on commemorative coins. Interpretation must always be little more than educated guesswork.
During the years 217-284 AD the empire sank into chaos - some 40 men were proclaimed as emperor, at least locally, many of them simultaneous rivals; of these only one died a natural death (of plague - which again swept across the empire from the East, causing famine and depopulation in some regions). Military manpower, deployments, and logistics were all ruinously affected - not least by hyper-inflation, which reduced the value of the silver currency by a factor of a hundred, . further crippling state administration. While opposing generals struggled for imperial power, the Parthians attacked in the East; the Goths in the Balkans; the Marcomanni, Quadi and Sarmatians over the Danube; the Alamanni into Upper Germany, Raetia and northern Italy; the Franks into Lower Germany and Gaul, even reaching Spain.
Here, in his quarters in a frontier fort, a cavalry officer lies mortally wounded by a javelin which has struck up under his waist-length scale cuirass. This lies discarded, with his handsome iron and bronze helmet; note the pointed browguard, and the plume - later writings associate yellow with the cavalry.
The classic officer career, for a man of "equestrian" social rank in Rome's clearly defined class structure, started with a commission as prefect of an auxiliary cohort. After three or four years in post men of proven competence hoped for appointment as one of the half-dozen tribunes on the staff of a legion. Even fewer reached the third step - command of a cavalry a/a; and a few of the best might hope to take over one of the larger milliorio cavalry regiments.
Medical officers and orderlies were attached to Roman
Plate 16
units in the field, and hospitals have been tentatively identified at some forts; known names suggest that some doctors were Greeks. (The Romans held Greece in special regard as the cradle of civilisation, and it was the only province not obliged to provide auxiliary cohorts for the army.) Well-made surgical instruments for many specialised uses have been found; many herbal remedies were known; but wounds like this - inevitably involving chronic shock, blood loss, internal injury and infection - would normally have been beyond the doctor's powers.
An infantry comrade tries to comfort the wounded man.
His enormously deep bronze helmet is the last known example showing unbroken development from the classic "Imperial" legionary style. Ringmail and scale armour had probably replaced the articulated cuirass entirely before the middle of the century; the latest sculptured example dates from c,203, and the latest datable fragments are from a site in use c.226- 260 AD. His spotho hangs from a characteristic broad baldric; its pierced bronze plates sometimes bore a good-luck motto (e.g. "Jupiter Greatest and Best, Protect This Unit, Soldiers Ali").
Officers' quarters in forts were plastered and painted like civilian homes. This officer keeps a slave/mistress, who holds an oil lamp for the doctor; such relationships were sometimes long and affectionate, but quite distinct from the formal obligations of marriage between families of the equestrian class.
Legionaries in battle against Parthian/Sassanian horse-archers Mesopotamia. C.260 AD
From the 1 st Century BC onwards the Scythian kings of Parthia (roughly modern Iraq and Iran) were Rome's most persistent rivals. The two empires were too rich, too avaricious, and too nearly contiguous to co-exist in peace; and each was too strong, with too great a strategic depth, to ever suffer final and decisive defeat. In virtually every reign Roman armies campaigned against Parthia, either in the buffer-state of Armenia or in Mesopotamia itself. Sometimes (as under Nero's great general Corbulo, and Trajanus) they won notable victories and installed garrisons beyond the Euphrates; sometimes they suffered shattering defeats; most often, they were led deep into the wilderness by elusive cavalry armies, only to withdraw in frustration.
In 226 AD the Parthian monarchy was overthrown, and the kingdom incorporated into a greater empire, by the Sassanian Persians from the south. The Sassanids profited from Roman disunity; and in 260 their King Shapur inflicted a catastrophic defeat at Edessa on the Emperor Valerian, killing him and taking tens of thousands of legionaries into slavery. This war left historians the priceless gift of Dura Europos, a captured Roman fortress on the Euphrates where helmets, armour, shields and wall-paintings survived amazingly intact.
Here a legionary stands over a fallen officer, while javelineers fight off horse-archers deceived by the dustclouds into venturing too close. In the absence of firm evidence our reconstructions are tentative, but logical. The previous identification of the often-found helmet at left as a cavalry type is challenged today; it seems equally likely to be heavy infantry issue, and several similar finds have been made on sites associated with infantry (including legionary) units. Its notable features are the pointed. up-tilted browguard, and huge cheekguards covering the ears (once thought to be solely a cavalry feature) and overlapping in front of the chin.
Ringmail shirts with short, half-length, and long sleeves all appear among the evidence; some have been found with decorative bronze mail strips incorporated. Dished oval
Plate 17
shields have been found, painted pink; an early copy of a wall-painting shows various other pale colours, and the type of blazons illustrated - crude foliate wreaths and sprays in black or white. This legionary fights defensively with his pilum (now a socketed rather than tanged type); since the 2nd Century at least, the legions occasionally fought against dangerous enemy cavalry by forming a tight phalanx several ranks deep, the rear ranks throwing their pila over the heads of this wall of braced shields and spears.
Wall-paintings show purple edging to officers' white tunics. Complete shirts of bronze ring mail are known; here we guess at the fastening chest-plates, as also associated with scale cuirasses. His decorated iron and bronze helme1 has a plume knob, an up-tilted pointed browguard, a pointed edge above the nose, and cheekguards meeting over the chin. The inside of his flat oval shield, copied from a superb Dura Europos find, is highly decorated; the outside was red, with complex multi-coloured friezes and an astonishing Amazon battle scene.
There is sculptural and written evidence that from the early 3rd Century different men within the legion WE;lre equipped with several different types of fighting spear and throwing javelin; a legionary of Legio /I Parthica, raised by Septimius Severus, is shown with a bundle of five javelins, and we reconstruct a slung quiver as logical (though the only direct reference to javelin quivers applies to cavalrymen). The javelineers' helmets have the crossed reinforces only embossed rather than attached; they are taken from a datable contemporary German find.
In the 260s-280s a series of tough soldier-emperors from Illyricum (roughly modern Yugoslavia) managed to partly restore the frontiers by incessant campaigning, Diocletianus (r.284-305), an administrative genius, built on the improvisations of his predecessors to organise a military system wholly different from the old army - a system further developed by Constantinus (r,306-337), Diocletianus divided responsibility between two co-emperors, for the East and West, each with a picked deputy (to whom, in theory, he would eventually hand over power), Constantinus, who ruled alone, moved his capital from Rome to Constantinople (Istanbul),
The army was divided between static frontier troops (/imitane/), and much stronger mobile field armies, which the defence of the empire now demanded, Vexillations from the old frontier legions and auxiliaries, and new units, formed regional field armies called comitatenses, and the emperors' central reserve units or oatotir». Field army units still included "legions", but now only some 1,000 strong; a few, formed from detachments of the old frontier legions, kept their traditional titles (e,g, Legio V Macedonica), but others had new-style names (e.q. the newly raised loviani and Herculiani), Cavalry units were assembled from every possible source, old and new, and were increasingly important,
The long civil wars, barbarian invasions, collapse of the economy, plague, famine, and loss of territory all contributed to a chronic shortage of men and money; Diocletianus made military service by soldiers' sons compulsory, and the army was now paid not in cash but in food, clothing and other materials, with occasional bounties in un- debased gold coinage, Apart from these conscripts, from this period on increasing numbers of "Roman" soldiers would be German or Gothic mercenaries, often serving in well equipped 500-strong auxilia palatini - both barbarians from beyond the frontiers, and settlers whose incursions were regularised by treaty, Their chieftain/ officers could rise to the highest ranks in Roman service,
Plato 18
The army's appearance was as different as its character, as we see in this plate, In an old military graveyard beside a Roman road, an officer broods over the aftermath of a battle during the brief civil war which established Constontinus's rule, Sculpture, mosaics and surviving metal objects suggest a costume influenced by Rome's eastern and Danubian allies and enemies,
Long-sleeved tunics now bear edge-stripes and applique patches on skirt and shoulder, often in purple or maroon; number and shape may indicate rank or some other kind of status, Trousers often resemble medieval footed hose, tight to the leg and passing inside the shoe, Germanic-style beltswide, with bronze plates and stiffeners, and narrower secondary straps supporting the scabbard - replace baldrics,
The supply of equipment seems to have been badly disrupted during the civil wars, Scale and ringmail shirts are still worn; but the long line of "Imperial" helmets has ended. Instead of their deep, skilfully-worked single-piece skulls we find simpler types, of separate segments rivetted to a framework sometimes with a nasal bar, and cheek- and neckguards sewn or strapped to the leather lining, The soldier lying dead beneath a manuballista (a man-portable arrowshooting catapult) wears a crude, cheap example; the officer has a very elaborate gilt version, with large paste "jewels", and a crest raised on thick rivets, Although a coin shows Constantinus wearing such a helmet some similar finds - as before - bear owners' marks suggesting that even the most elaborate did not always belong to officers; they may perhaps have identified high-status palatine cavalry?
In the background ride troopers of one of the units armed (since Hodrionuss reign) with the corvus. a lance about 12ft,long, which was used two-handed; it was probably copied from the Sarmatians, like the draco standard, This had a metal animal head and a multi-coloured fabric "windsock" body; it was in use by Roman cavalry during the 2nd Century, and by the legions from c,260 AD,
The 3rd-4th Century reforms included a huge programme of fortification. Since the frontier garrisons, thinned out by the manpower demands of the field armies, were now little more than "trip- wires" to buy time in the face of invasions which had become incessant due to massive population movements beyond the north-east frontiers, the towns and military depots in the interior needed defensive walls. One specific chain of new and rebuilt defences were the large stone forts along the Saxon Shore - the eastern and southern coasts of Britain, facing the growing scourge of seaborne Germanic raiders from c.270 onwards. These often defended naval bases, typically to guard estuaries from infiltration; from their harbours blue-sailed ships with blue-clad crews patrolled the threatened coasts.
The garrison of Britain had been stripped of troops so often (as it would be again) to fight civil wars or to resist continental invasions that its strength is uncertain. The titles of old legionary and auxiliary units are still found among the limitanei holding Hadrian's Wall against the northern tribes (now termed the Picts), and the coastal forts against raiders from both free Germany and, later, Ireland. The limitaneiwere strung out in weak units - anything from a hundred to a few hundred men - permanently based at frontier forts, surrounded by their villages, families and fields. They have been compared to a hereditary rural militia, but this is probably exaggerated: they were sometimes transferred wholesale to field armies, so must still have been militarily significant.
Trouble on the northern frontier in c.342 brought the Emperor Constans with part of his field army to Britain; he also strengthened the Saxon Shore defences and appointed a regional commander over them. Further rumblings in the north, coastal raids, civil wars and troop withdrawals were followed, in 367, by disaster; massive and apparently coordinated raids by the Picts from Scotland, the Attacotti from Ireland, and Franks and Saxons from the continent overran the garrison and devastated Britain for two years before the
Plate I 9
general Theodosius restored order with field army units.
This officer (left) and his men wear the type of uniforms common in contemporary mosaics. The troops wear "ridge helmets", so called from excavated examples cheaply made in two halves, the central join covered by a ridged central strip; these were probably mass-produced in the new government factories set up by Diocletianus to service the regional armies. The officer's is a handsomely silvered and gilt variation on the same basic construction. Sewn-on tunic strips and patches were of various shapes, numbers and colours; later garments surviving from Roman Egypt suggest that some had complex patterns in fine embroidery. The broad Germanic belts have many bronze fittings, including characteristic "propeller" -shaped stiffeners. The oval shield (background) bears a blazon identified in a half-understood early 5th Century document as that of the Secunda Britannica, a small regional field army unit perhaps formed from the British garrison's old Legio /I Augusta.
The heavy catapult called an onager ("wild ass", from its massive kick) is reconstructed here after a written description and modern experiments. It was simpler to make than the sophisticated light field catapults (see Plate 4), though useful only in positional fighting. Traversing by means of manpower and levers must have been difficult, but contemporary battle descriptions make clear that it was feasible. In modern experiments a reconstructed two-ton onager threw 3.62kg (8Ib.) stone balls nearly 460m (500 yards); there are also ancient descriptions of pitch-soaked incendiary ammunition, and common sense suggests that this could be useful against enemy ships.
In 376 AD the Visigoths, pressed against the Danube frontier by the advancing Huns, received permission from Valens, Roman Emperor of the East, to settle inside the empire on condition that they were disarmed. Some 200,000 starving people - a whole migrating nation - crossed the river; but maltreatment by Roman officials soon provoked them onto the war trail once more.
In summer 378 Valens led some 60,000 men of the eastern army from Constantinople north-west into Thrace. Near Hadrianopolis (modern Edirne) he waited to be joined by his teenaged nephew Gratian, Emperor of the West; but an unexpected encounter with Fritigern' s Visigoth army prompted him to advance before these reinforcements arrived. On the stiflingly hot afternoon of 9 August 378 the Roman army attacked the huge Gothic wagon-circle. The Roman infantry were locked in combat when the Gothic and allied Alan cavalry charged on both wings, driving the flanking Roman cavalry from the field. The Gothic infantry swept round the Roman flanks and rear, surrounding them in a compacted mass. Parched, confused, blinded by dust, flinching under a hail of arrows, the Roman army was butchered: Valens died, and two-thirds of his men were killed or captured. Rome never recovered from this disaster; and for the few years left to her, her armies largely comprised Gothic, Alan, and even Hun mercenaries.
This desperate knot of legionaries, auxiliaries and troopers of volens's doomed army, surrounded but making as good an ending as they can, bear little resemblance to the classic legionaries illustrated on Plate 3. But why should they, when as wide a gulf of time separates them as that between Marlborough's redcoats and today's paratroopers? Their government has been settled for fifty years in a Greek city in Asia Minor; their costume and gear have long been influenced by enemies and allies from beyond the Danube.
Most wear ridge-helmets of strikingly similar, and thus presumably mass-produced types found in Hungary and Germany; stitch-holes suggest that the leather lining was
Plate 20
turned outside the edges. Their tunics bear characteristic applique embroidered patches, stripes and caping; shield blazons are largely based on those shown for palatine units of the Eastern emperor's field army in the early 5th Century Notitia Dignitatum, a partly understood document surviving in two conflicting copies.
At far left a soldier displays the wheel-shaped blazon listed for the Lanciarii Seniores, the army's senior legio palatino. Next to him the red oval shield marks the Bucinobantes, an auxilium palatinum raised from Germans allowed to settle in Britain. Modern experiments suggest that the lead-weighted martiobarbulus dart, of which five were carried fixed behind the shield in some way, was thrown underarm to plunge down behind enemy shields; one is poised here by a soldier of the Martiarii Seniores, a legio palatina.
In the centre, one standing defiant over the other's corpse, are two men of elite guard cavalry units - scolae; their handsome helmets are based on finds at Budapest, Hungary and Concesti, Romania; and note that wrist-length ringmail shirts are shown in several sculpted and painted sources. At the right, a junior officer holds the draco standard of his unit; his metal - crested helmet is taken from one found at Intercisa, Hungary, and a catacomb wall painting in Syracuse, Sicily. (Some sources suggest that such helmets also existed with similar crests of stiff hair.) The Syracuse painting also shows this (most unusually, red) tunic, with purple clavi; and a shield resembling that held over him by the soldier at far right. This kind of blazon with paired, opposed animal heads from a single "neck" occurs several times in the Notitia, sometimes for light infantry auxilia palatina, one of them a unit of Britons.
Rome's typical method of conquest was not outright invasion. Trade and diplomatic links were first established with a free people beyond the frontier. Subsidies were offered to selected chiefs; a protagonist in an internal quarrel was supported, helped to victory, then turned into a Roman puppet; pressure was applied to accept some form of protectorate; and only then were the legions sent in, at a time of strife, to protect Roman interests. Subsequent rebellions were put down with genocidal ferocity, while the ruling class was bribed and flattered to accept the very real material advantages of Roman rule.
The empire inherited by Augustus in c.30 BC would not be very greatly enlarged thereafter. During his reign the Teutoburg Forest disaster halted expansion in Germany beyond a Rhineland buffer zane. Claudius and Nero added England and Wales; Trajanus expanded the empire to its greatest extent in c.115 AD, with Dacia and Mesopotamia annexed, but both were too vulnerable to be held permanently. From c.120 AD onwards the frontiers ceased to be jumping-off lines for further expansion, and became a hugely long defensive perimeter. Its defenders were spread far too thinly to resist indefinitely the growing pressure of external attacks - and the plague of civil war which ravaged the empire in the decades after 218 AD fatally weakened them.
The later 2nd and 3rd Centuries saw almost constant defensive fighting on the long Danube frontier, as vast movements of population in the Eurasian hinterland began to force a succession of tribal peoples west and south against Rome's borders. Parthia, later Sassanid Persia, made equally frequent attempts on the Caucasian and Mesopotamian fronts.
The late 3rd Century Illyrian soldier-emperors achieved an extraordinary, if partial military recovery from the 260s AD onwards; and in the 280s and 330s two emperors of genius, Diocletianus and Constantinus, virtually redesigned the Roman state. But it was a relatively impoverished and
demoralised state, which was only rebuilt at the cost of a totalitarian regime; an intrusive and costly bureaucracy, ruinous taxes and merciless conscription did not command willing loyalty. The old Roman values of duty and discipline, characteristic of the years of optimistic expansion, had been leached away. The old certainties - the authority of the monarchy, a vibrant economy, military loyalty and the habit of victory - had all been destroyed; they could only be restored in fragile imitation.
As the 4th Century wore on the new mobile reserves devised by Diocletianus proved unable to prevent the barbarians from raging through the frontier provinces every few years - while human greed usually sabotaged his theoretically admirable pattern for an orderly succession of emperors. Each defeat, each tide of raiders cost more irreplaceable men and gold, and further damaged the dwindling resources of the state. Each mutiny, each bloody squabble over the diminished throne cost more in hope, belief and prestige. By the end of the century the names of a few of the old legions were all that was remembered in an army which had utterly changed character.
The dread of Rome's name could no longer hold back an entire continent on the move. The catastrophe of Hadrianopolis, in 378, was the fatal wound. For another thirty years Roman armies, scraped together as much from halfdisciplined barbarian mercenaries as from branded provincial conscripts, scrambled back and forth between the Rhine and Thrace, commanded more loyally by the Vandal warlord Stilicho than by rival Roman generals. But in the first years of the 5th Century the dams were finally swept away; Germanic tribesmen beyond numbering poured over the Rhine, across Gaul and Spain, even crossing to North Africa; and in 410 AD Rome herself was contemptuously sacked by her one-time paid ally, Alaric the Goth. The Roman Empire in the West was gone forever.
w a:
-
a.
~
en
W _ §
0·-
Z~~
0)-
.", .§ ~
............. c II1II:: c 0
-== <3 .~
O~ ~
a: ~ CO ~ .s
x
- 0
wen .....
0) a. U a.
::t: ..... ~ ~
o, co
(/)
>-.. ::l I
/ I-
« 0.. /
~
W <.9 i
w .
(f) « I
_- -1
• I
t \
,
« \
~
« I
z \
w
a:
~ I
0
~ \
I
_. -I
i
I
I
a: I
Q , I
a:
w
0..
::l .'
(/)
a: ~ .I
Q z I
a: « /
w ~
LL a: ;"
z w
s <.9 ./
I
~ ;'
I
i
\ I
·\1 Cf)
~ ID
"E
0
0 _Q
'" QJ
'" ~ o
c:
~ (j) S
"c \\
Q) nl e
.~ s Cl.
nl QJ
I '"
1 E
r- (/) i c: x
0 0
(/) .6> a.
z I .!!' o,
"\ QJ «
c:
0
~I I
I
[ o « o
CX!
U
During campaigns of expansion Roman armies built forts of turf and timber to guard the limits of each new advance, to protect lines of communication through newly occupied tribal areas, and to accomodate troops lying up for the winter. As the frontiers moved forward these might be abandoned or destroyed, or they might be permanently garrisoned. The traces of hundreds of such posts have been located.
Their defences were adequate, but not massive: they were essentially bases from which troops moved out to fight offensively in the open. Although some sites do betray signs of having been stormed and burnt by the tribes during major outbreaks, forts were normally safe against enemies lacking siege technology. Depending on the terrain they might be surrounded by one, two, or more ditches, carefully sited and profiled to trap attackers in a "killing ground" within javelinthrow of the ramparts.
As some frontiers solidified into permanent defensive borders in the 2nd Century, old forts were strengthened with stone ramparts, and new posts were built in stone. Archaeology suggests that it was common for the facing wall of the ramparts, the gatehouses and rampart towers, the headquarters building, the commander's house and perhaps the granaries to be built in stone, while the barracks and miscellaneous stores and workshops often remained in timber or plastered wattle on stone footings, Some forts were occupied, continually or at intervals, for centuries; many sites show evidence of periodic improvement, re-occupation or rebuilding. A few have revealed the addition of artillery platforms behind the rampart-walk, to support catapults; these ominous reminders of the increased threat of direct attack usually date from the 3rd Century,
Frontier forts varied in size and internal layout according to the garrison (between about 3.75 acres for an infantry cohort, and 12,5 acres for a cavalry ala milliaria); and in exact shape according to the terrain; but our drawing shows a "typical" playing card-shaped Single cohort post with stone
defences, to accomodate an auxiliary cohort of about 480 men, Such forts were usually sited within a day's easy march of one another for mutual support, and linked by good roads, with small signal-relay stations (apparently for passing smoke and fire signals) at shorter intervals, Inscriptions suggest that garrison units might sometimes occupy the same post for many decades,
The exact layout of the barracks, stores and workshops in the "corners" varied widely, but certain features are almost invariably found, The road from the main gate leads directly to a central headquarters building, beside which is the commander's imposing house; and continues behind it to the rear gate, A crossways road links the side gates, passing across the front of the HQ building and commander's house, Granaries, with buttressed walls and raised floors, were usually sited centrally, with easy wagon access to a gate,
The HQ building had a colonnaded courtyard, often with a well or water tanks, flanked by ranges of rooms believed to have housed the central armoury, At the rear was an impressive two-storey-high hall with a dais at one end, presumably for indoor ceremonial; along its rear side were ranged offices, the paymaster's strongroom, etc" centred on the shrine where the unit standards and other religious objects were housed,
Fort sites have yielded evidence for fairly sophisticated water supply and sewerage arrangements, including latrine blocks cleaned by running water. The purpose of many of the interior buildings is unknown, however; the siting of the stables in cavalry forts is not yet fully understood, and as mentioned under Plate 14, no central cooking or messing arrangements have been identified, In fact, surprisingly few of the hundreds of known fort sites have been thoroughly excavated, particularly with regard to internal buildings apart from the central range; future generations of historians have much enjoyable work to do,
Ia::~ O~
u.. §o
.!::«
Z t >-
o .....
<..c: .2
o c u CD
cbo
c-o o c
O co C\J
u CD
,.,., -0.. £;
1.1. ~o
00 Q)
~
o
.......
(/J
06 00 Q. o ..c (/J
.x:
~
o
~
00 Q)
~
o
.......
00
06
Q) 00 ::'i o ..c
_00
~
Q)
"'0 C m
E E o
o
\ - t:
00 CD
~
o
.......
00
06 00 Q. o ..c
00 .x:
~
o
~
/
00 00 Q.Q) o ~ ..c 0 00 .......
.x: 00
006 ~