KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, KUMASI.
          COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
  DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING.
EXPERIMENT: THE EFFECTS OF END CONDITIONS ON
              BUCKLING LOAD
               DATE; 29:03:2019
                 LECTURER;
                DR. Y. FIAGBE
                  Group H
Names                          Index no.
1. Okoh- Appiah Jeffery        5980016
2. Adasi Samuel                5966316
3. Benson Leslie Nana Yahans   5971716
4. Mahmoud Mahama Dimmie       5977516
5. Yeboah Frederick            5983716
6. Appiah Kubi Emmanuel        5969916
7. Sai Daniel Nii Annan        5981716
8. Agyei-Marfo Benjamin        5967916
9. Danso Enoch Nanor           5973816
10. Danso Aboagye Kwasi        5973916
11. Hodonu Prince Selorm        5975416
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the maximum load at which a strut under compression will
buckle at certain end conditions.
EQUIPMENTS:
Struts with different lengths
Euler’s Buckling apparatus
DESCRIPTION OF EXPERIMENT:
Compressive members can be seen in man structures. They can form part of a framework for instance in a
roof truss, or they can stand-alone; a water tower support is an example of such ,unlike tension member
which will generally only fail if the ultimate tensile tress is exceeded, a compressive member can fail in
two ways. The first is via rapture due to direct stress, and the second is by an elastic mode of failure
called buckling. Generally, short wide compressive members that tend to fail by the material crushing are
called columns. Long thin compressive members that tend to fail by buckling are called struts. When
buckling occurs the strut will no longer carry any more load it will continue to displace i.e. its stiffness
then becomes zero and it is useless as a structural member.
PROCEDURE:
1. Remove the bottom chuck from the machine and clamped the specimen using the cap head
screw and plate to make a pinned-fixed end condition.
 2. For fixed-fixed end conditions, fit the top chuck with the two cap head screws and clamped both ends
of the specimen.
Select the shortest strut, number 1, and measured the cross section using a Vernier caliper and calculate
the second moment of inertia I, for the strut.
 3. Adjust the position of the sliding crosshead to accept the strut and used thumbnuts to lock off the
slider. Ensured that there is a maximum amount of travel available on the hand wheel thread to compress
the strut and then finally tighten the locking screws.
4. Carefully back off the hand wheel so that the strut is resting in the notch but not transmitting
any load; Re-zero the force meter using the front panel control.
5. Carefully start to load the strut: If the strut buckled to the left, flick the strut to the right and vice versa.
This reduces any errors associated with the straightness of the strut.
6. Turn the hand wheel until there is no further increase in load. Record the final load in the table under
‘buckling’ load.
7. We repeat the procedure with strut numbered 2, 3, 4 and 5 adjusting the crosshead as required to fit the
strut.
8. Load each strut several times until a consistent result was achieved.
Euler’s buckling load for a pinned strut was calculated using the formula;
Pe=π²EI/ L²
Where
Pe= Euler’s buckling load (N)
E = Young’s modulus (Nm ̵ ˡ)
I = Second moment of inertia (m⁴)
L = length of strut (m)
PRECAUTIONS:
    1. Experimental setup should not be disturbed.
    2. Loading of the shorter strut must be done carefully as the difference needed to obtain buckling
       load and the load needed to obtain plastic deformation is quite small.
    3. We offloaded the struts immediately after buckling to avoid damaging the strut
       permanently.