Corning Glass - A Case Study
Corning Glass - A Case Study
Corning Glass
By Waheed Akhtar
Student ID: 20162451
Table of content 2
Organisational culture 7
Types of organisational culture 8
1. Clan 8
2. Adhocracy 8
3. Market 8
4. Hierarchy 8
Competing Values Framework 9
Culture Alignment Framework 11
Organisational Behaviour 20
Goals of Organizational Behavior Study 21
Major Contributing Disciplines to the field of Organizational Behavior 22
Importance of Organisational Behaviour 24
System Model 29
Components of System Model 30
The “System” 30
Management Role 30
In complicated vibrant environments, management takes into account the ever-changing
requirements of job structures and organization’s social needs. 31
Employee Needs 31
Impact on Performance 31
System - The Understanding Layers 31
Subsystems 31
Blackbox 32
Transformation 32
Boundary 32
Components of a System 32
Input 32
Processor 33
Output 33
Feedback 33
Control 33
Learning Theories 34
Elements of Learning Theories 34
Modern Learning Theories 34
Behavioural Learning 34
Cognitive Learning 34
Constructive Learning 35
Transformative Learning 35
Final Words 40
References 41
The glass, one of man’s ancient romances!
The legend has it that the glass is the finest work of a wizard with the purest heart from
prehistoric times. He mastered himself experimenting with time. During one of his experiments,
he took a pinch of sands of time and heated it on a high flame taken from his inner self. On such
a high temperature, the finest particles of sands of time started melting forming a liquid portal
between multiple dimensions. It was an extremely delicate experiment which could mess up all
dimensions of time leading into a catastrophe. At the verge, the wizard sprinkled the coldest of
his emotions and a pinch of stardust on the fire and let the liquid time to settle its inner bonds.
While it was still crystallizing, the wizard kept chanting, “Now I see you, now I don’t. Be a riddle,
be glass!”.
Every time he chanted the mantra, a freshly born star from the centre of Milkyway submerged
into the crystallizing liquid giving a part of it dozens of unique colours.
And then he infused his last breath into the dimensions of liquid time and everything immortality
crystalized into a large transparent sheet with hundred of colours frozen between the layers
time!
O’ that state of the art wizardry, he managed to capture the moments of his final breath into that
giant sheet of frozen crystals from the sand of times.
Centuries passed seeing series of wizards who brought further innovations to glass. Talking
about the wizards, Corning Glass is the finest of all!
A company, a legend!
The year was 1851 when Amory Houghton, in Somerville, Massachusetts, founded a company
named Bay State Glass Co which later moved to the city of Corning, New York, in 1868. under
the leadership of Amory Houghton, Jr. and got a new name Corning Glass Works which we
know Corning Incorporated today (Referenceforbusiness.com, 2019).
Since its inception, the 168 years of the company has been at the forefront of innovation and
now valued at $27 billion (Anon, 2019). The company started its journey as a glass
manufacturer, Pyrex and Corningware now manufacture very advanced kind of glass materials
for automobiles, fibre optic cables and smartphones and computer tech industry.
Corning’s history is all about innovations and most of its innovations involve glass. People may
think of glass as a single material, but for Corning’s Research and Development team, it’s not.
They treat glass as a platform that can be tuned and modified as per the need and application.
One of their earlier innovations was the bulb-shaped glass encasements for great Thomas
Edison’s incandescent lamp. The beauty of that simple droplet shaped design was that it was
able to tolerate the atmospheric pressure equally at every point with a vacuum inside. Later,
with the popularity of electricity, Corning’s innovative technique to mass produce the bulbs
brought light to the world.
Later, in the early 20th century, they discovered a way to make glass stronger and heat
resistant which into innovations like Pyrex and Corning Ware, which is still the industry standard
in glass cookware even after more than 100 years.
They produced glass for everything from Mercury Program to space shuttle, including lamps,
doors, television panels and spacecraft tasks (Cmog.org, 2019).
In 1964, they developed a unique method called fusion forming involving lava hot glass pouring
seven floors down mid-air forming a lengthy uniform layer sliced later into required shapes and
sizes (Corning.com, 2019).
They even have invented a ceramic emission filter for automobiles to catch pollutants before
they escape the vehicle's exhaust pipe. This innovation is now an industry standard worldwide.
In the 1960s, Charles Kao published a paper stating that laser could be used to carry
information if a highly sophisticated clear glass pipe or wire with certain features could exist
(NobelPrize.org, 2019). That could help to overcome the bottlenecks that copper or other metals
offered for communication which could lead to a high-speed data transfer. Corning saw this as
an opportunity and took it as a challenge resulting in the innovation of low-loss fibre optic cable
in the 1970s which used glass instead of copper. It was capable of carrying 65,000 times more
information than a traditional copper wire. This was a revolution and quickly became the
backbone of modern high-speed internet. If there is a company who is wrapping around the
globe with a physical spider web of fibre optic cable, it’s Corning.
A few months before the iPhone's release, Apple approached Corning in 2007 with a need to
build a scratch-resistant glass that can also survive drops (Aamoth and Aamoth, 2019). Corning
reacted instantly and created Gorilla glass, which is now an international standard in the
smartphone sector.
If it was not Corning, the modern tech industry would have been very different.
Corning’s journey, a bird's eye view
Organisational culture
The values, behaviours, contributing towards building a distinctive and quirky social and
psychological environment of a company lay the foundations of its organisational culture which
is extremely unique, particular and special to that organisation.
The organizational culture is the key to influence the way people interact within as well as
outside of that organisation. A healthy organisation culture plays a key role in neutralising the
resistance people may have towards certain changes.
Organisational culture also defines the context of acquiring, sharing and securing the knowledge
as a fundamental asset for an organisation.
Ravasi and Schultz describe organizational culture as a set of shared assumptions and patterns
that develop desired behaviours (Ravasi and Schultz, 2006). Culture also help to seed the
pattern of such collective behaviours and assumptions into new members of the organisation to
them perceive and share the vision of leadership as well as feel it. It has a very strong impact on
the way employees and different groups interface with each other as well as with clients and
stakeholders (Schrodt, 2002).
According to Deal, Kennedy (Deal and Kennedy, 2002), Kotter (Kotter, 2011) and Schein
(Schein, 1988), even though organisations may have their own unique culture but they often
have a set of subcultures as well which are primarily a result of different organisational units as
well as geographical locations. These co-existing subcultures are sometimes are conflicting
since each subculture is offspring of a different management team, geography, organisational
unit and client needs.
Flamholtz and Randle (Flamholtz and Randle, 2011) define organizational culture as "corporate
personality" that consists of the values, beliefs, and norms influencing the behaviour of people
as members of an organization.
1. Clan
A clan culture has a higher degree of flexibility and internally focused. It focuses more on
mentoring, nurturing and teamwork. Organisations with such a culture tend to establish a
family-like work environment.
2. Adhocracy
Adhocracy-oriented cultures have a greater degree of behaviour-control and are
internally concentrated. Such a culture is vibrant, entrepreneurial, focusing on risk-
taking, creativity, and first-doing.
3. Market
Market-oriented cultures are externally concentrated and have a greater degree of
monitoring conduct. Such a culture is outcomes-oriented, focusing on the rivalry,
accomplishment, and completion of work.
4. Hierarchy
Also, hierarchy-oriented cultures are externally focused with greater flexibility. Structured
and regulated, this sort of organizational culture focuses on effectiveness, stabilization
and doing stuff right.
While adopting a culture for an organisation, nothing is right and wrong. The right culture is the
one best suited to the vision, direction and strategy of a particular organization since each
organisation has its challenges and issues which are unique to it and must have to be dealt with
in a certain timeframe. There is a higher possibility that adopting one single culture will not be
beneficial for an organisation, so most of times organisations tend to demonstrate the
characteristics of multiple cultures at the same time.
● Hierarchy and Market: When it comes to the principal focus on stability a Hierarchy
culture based on the control leads to incremental changes and incremental changes are
very important for an old company like Corning to stay relevant even after 160 years.
● Clan and Adhocracy: When it comes to flexibility and adaptability, Adhocracy culture
typically leads to breakthrough change which has helped Corning leading the innovation
in the industry throughout its life span.
It’s very strange and fascinating to observe something transparent demonstrating different
colours when putting to light. This is truly magical. We see the colours in the glass which are not
really present there. When looked through from certain angles, glass tends to bends the light
rays of different wavelengths to different amounts resulting into spectral colours appear to
appear like magic. (Explain that Stuff, 2019)
That’s exactly how the organisational culture works. It makes people believe in the vision of the
company.
For example, if a company has the vision to produce and sell blue bananas and blue oranges,
it’s their organisational culture and corporate branding that will make its employees believe in
the concept and share the same vision.
A vision is one of the most beautiful things that an organisation can seed into its employees and
great vision is always much bigger than individuals.
The Corning is no exception. Its innovations are a journey to excellence spanning over three
centuries.
How Corning went from Pyrex to Gorilla Glass, it’s not a mystery, it’s a dedication towards the
constantly evolving vision. Today, they are no more described as glassmakers but as a technology
company that specialises in making speciality materials for industrial and scientific applications.
Corning has 108 manufacturing facilities and employes more 55,000 people in 15 countries.
Corning is not just a company, it’s a vision and a revolution… And for a company to become a
revolution, it must have a very strong Organisational Culture and strongly rooted values. In the
line below, we will have a closer look at the organisational culture and its values that make
Corning... The Corning, the greatest wizard of all times.
Strategic human resource management (SHRM)
An organisation always has a connection between its human resources, strategies, objectives,
and goals. That connection is defined as Strategic human resource management which
primarily deals with:
● Make advancements in flexibility, innovation, and competitive advantage.
● Develop an organizational culture that is in keeping with the vision of the organization.
For many businesses, human resources problems can be hard to overcome; there are various
elements that could upset company owners and create unnecessary choices that delay
activities for their staff and businesses.
Strategic HR includes examining how staffing can have a significant effect on the development
of a company. HR staff must use a strategy to develop and retain their staff to address the
requirements of a company's long-term intentions.
Strategic management of human resources i.e. SHRM has a seven-step process to guide
human resource leadership to achieve this.
You must also be prepared to formulate your short-term and long-term development goals for
the appropriate HR staff through a well defined and clear communication to make it easier for
HR personnel so that he can formulate it to an effective resource management strategy.
2. Evaluate HR capability
Evaluation of your HR skills will allow you to know your staff and how they help to achieve your
goals and goals. Carrying out an inventory of abilities for each worker is also a very good idea.
Inventories of expertise assist you to find out which staff are specialists in specific fields. It also
enables you to recognize staff who are interested in being educated in a specific part of your
business.
● Demand
A forecast should be produced regarding the amount of staff with the related abilities
needed to meet the potential of the company.
● Supply
Look at the staff and abilities accessible to assist the business to attain its global
objectives.
● The ability of current staff to assess their capacity to carry fresh tasks and roles duties.
● Whether the knowledge and expertise of the staff are adequately used.
● Whether existing human resources staff and procedures can support the development of
the company.
5. Determine the necessary instruments and tools to fulfil the task
HR staff need to work with the relevant agencies to determine how the instruments employed
affect their capacity to fulfil their responsibilities.
For example, in order to recognize differences in instruments that will enable the more
structured workforce, joint hardware or software audit can also be conducted with the IT
department.
It is equally important to keep the staff driven by frequent reviews on results using adjoining
journals.
In order to get the new human resource management strategy implemented, the following steps
are taken care of:
Some of the benefits of strategic human resource management are given below:
The following chart shows a brief comparison between Traditional HRM and Strategic HRM:
Human Capital Planning @ Corning SHRM
More than a Head Count
According to company experts attending a session during the Talent Management Strategies
Conference sponsored by The Conference Board, Corning does not so much discuss
"individuals," but "procedures," in analysing its potential future skill requirements (SHRM, 2019).
With the rapidly changing market and needs, more than ever, the organization's efficacy relies
on its capacity to tackle problems such as knowledge management, change management, and
capacity building.
Unlike conventional workforce planning, HCP helps Corning to spend time, cash, and energy in
procedures that are more critical to securing that the business always has the correct quantity,
sort, and performance of expertise. It is no longer aimed at an exact headcount, instead, HCP
relies on segmentation as the basis for efficient planning (HCP at Corning, 2019).
Corning’s Discovery Stage
As said Christine M. Pambianchi, Corning’s vice president of human resources, Corning is
perhaps better regarded as a leader in glass and ceramics, and its competitive advantage is
due to intellectual property and being first in the market.
However, leadership at Corning understands that the problems with its skill base can influence
its capacity to perform:
● The price system, the cash flow and the capacity to provide products or facilities may be
affected by over or under understaffing the production units.
● The incorrect combination of skills contributing to poorly qualified workers can imply lost
business chances.
● The failure to employ individuals in a quick manner can also imply a lack of business
chances and/or bad client delivery and eventually a revenue erosion.
● The capacity of the organization to implement strategies and company schemes can be
immediately affected by an ill-equipped supply of skilled executives and technical
specialists.
Corning introduced a four-stage HCP method to address the HR problems and assist HR
leadership concentrate on the company's ever-changing requirements. Every Spring, the five-
year business cycle undergoes a profound dip.
Organisational Behaviour
The academic study of how individuals behave in a group is called Organizational Behaviour
(OB). The concepts of OB are mainly implemented in efforts to improve the efficiency of
business and companies.
Organizational behaviour research has its origins in the early 1920s, when the Western Electric
Company introduced a series of research on worker behaviour at its Hawthorne Works in
Cicero, Illinois.
These original results motivated wide-ranging research between 1924 and 1933. They included
impacts on job shifts productivity, loneliness, and brightness, among many other variables.
The best-known outcome is the Hawthorne effect, which shows how the behaviour of the
subjects can change if they know that they are being observed.
The study of organisational behaviour involves research fields that aim to increase employee
efficiency, enhance work fulfilment, promote creativity and encourage leadership in the pursuit
of innovation. Each of these fields has its own suggested activities, including the reorganization
of organizations, the amendment of reward systems or the change in performance
measurement techniques.
The fields of organizational behaviour are the social elements of organisations, such as how
ethnicity, category, and gender roles impact team construction and productivity, and how
ethnicity and history influence decision-making.
The nature of organisational behaviour.
● Social Psychology - How people and organisations interpret dispute, risks and stress.
● Political Science - Critical thinking skills to understand the power, authority, and
corporate politics.
● Economics - Appreciate financial and non-monetary rewards for staff to motivate them
and to produce loyalty.
The way behavioural sciences contribute towards OB
Importance of Organisational Behaviour
Some of the key benefits that Organisational Behaviour brings to a company may include:
● Using scientific research and methods it helps to predict how people will behave under
various circumstances.
● It also helps to predict if and when a certain incident will hit the organisation and what
will be the pros and cons of that incident.
The organization analyzes employee behaviour in three fundamental levels i.e. Individual Level,
Group Level and Organizational System Level
The foundation of this model is support-oriented leadership. The staff, in effect, are geared to
work with better efficiency and involvement. The employee needs are met and recognized.
The model is based on leadership, not cash or power. In reality, the organizational leadership
style offers an atmosphere to assist staff develop and effectively achieve their duties. The
executives acknowledge that the employees are not by definition idle and completely
uninterested in organisational requirements, but an inappropriate leadership style does.
Managers think the employees are willing to distribute accountability, create a push to contribute
their mite and enhance themselves, provided a sense of owing through suitable modifications.
Under a positive strategy, management's approach is to promote the work output of the
employee to meet both organisational and personal goals.
Leadership Approach
The leader believes that employees are not, by definition, inactive and driven to organisational
requirements, but are created by an inadequately friendly working climate. They'll hold
accountability, create a desire to participate, and enhance themselves if they're given an
opportunity by leadership.
Here management's focus is to foster the work efficiency of the worker rather than merely
promote the benefits transfers of the worker as in the custodial strategy. The employees talk
"we" and not "they" when relating to their organisation.
This model dictates that the notion of management is provided with an organizational point of
perspective, where the manager effectively guides the staff by creating excellent examples,
being accessible and engaging in different duties.
In simple words, the manager seeks to build the employees ' friendly operating environment.
These objectives of Supportive Model can be achieved through three “The” i.e. The Manager,
The Employee and The Workplace.
The Manager
The manager must be seen as a favourable supporting facilitator for employees, in order to
achieve that, the manager must work with all staff in order to make the most of every employee.
This strategy of leadership should lead to a strong level of staff satisfaction, which would
enhance efficiency over a period of time.
The Employee
The supportive model approach creates a notion that staff are self-motivated and that they have
importance and knowledge to add beyond their everyday roles to the company. The entire
concept of management is constructed around it. Unlike autocratic style, it suggests staff are
motivated by themselves and can create importance that extends beyond their day-to-day
activities or roles.
The Workplace
The question is, how to get the employees self-motivated?
The answer is simple. That's by establishing a favourable environment where they're motivated
to offer their thoughts, and there's some sort of "buy-in" in organizational behaviour
configuration and the route it follows.
The model endorsed customizing performance instruments and preparation of employees within
the modern approach.
It’s Corning's quality culture and homegrown scalable strategy that enable its staff in all roles to
engage in improvements and innovations. At Corning, innovation is a process that promotes the
creation of fresh products and technology. The innovation process included five phases, from
original knowledge building to leadership life-cycle.
The key values to guide the company are quality, integrity, performance, leadership innovation,
independence and individuals. The diagram below gives a better understanding of Corning’s
Performance Excellence Model.
The Corning Performance Excellence Model
System Model
The system model seeks to create emotions of shared confidence where employee
performance is guided by the embedded strategy, corporate culture, function of the worker and
apparent importance in the organization.
The organization examines the overall structure and team environment in the system model and
believes that individual people have different objectives, abilities and capability.
As a result, an organization receives several inputs from its environment which are then
analyzed and integrated into the final product or services.
The figure shows the relationship clearly
This model is, therefore, a change back from the traditional strategy, in which workers were
driven mainly by economic and other advantages. There are three key components of System
Model which make it a more relevant model today.
The “System”
The term "system" emerges from this perspective that the director is accountable for keeping
the group together, just as one system, through the sense of common respect and an
embedded ongoing process.
Management Role
System design managers are looking to solve any job problems that affect the process as a
whole and the number of staff. Managers function to a big level as facilitators or solvers.
In complicated vibrant environments, management takes into account the ever-changing
requirements of job structures and organization’s social needs.
Employee Needs
The system model considers staff requirements in a wider sense than just an economic
exchange: the model sees staff as seeking a healthy operating atmosphere that is backed by
instruments, procedures and a logical organisation.
This model dictates that the staff will attempt their utmost to satisfy the requirements, and to
achieve successful outcomes for their organization if the organization recognizes and trusts its
staff and gives them suitable duties. It also suggests that staff should be benefited from
enhanced employment skills, knowledge and teammates.
Impact on Performance
When the staff feel confident and satisfied with the organization and understand that they
perform a precious role, they will become more engaged. This is because they feel owning the
positions and even portion of the organization's leadership.
Subsystems
Each system consisting of sub-systems that, in turn, consisting of other sub-systems, is marked
by its limits. Interconnections between sub-systems are known as interfaces. Interfaces take the
form of inputs and outputs at the boundaries.
The system, subsystem and environment
Blackbox
A sub-system at the lowest level for which Inputs and outputs are defined, but not the
transformation process, may not be defined as a processor. Such a system is called Blackbox.
Transformation
A system gets and generates outputs when inputs are transformed. The conversion method is
controlled. Feedback regulation is used in many processes.
The feedback control involves estimation of the inputs, i.e. contrast of the yield to a norm,
indicating the production of the scheme and a monitoring mechanism that can change the
system process to draw the output closest to the standard.
Boundary
There is a boundary to each system. Anything outside that boundary is called the environment.
Components of a System
Input
Input involves machinery, workforce, commodities, cash, time etc.
Processor
A processor is a component of a system that includes transforming input into output and it's a
system's functional element Processors may change input completely or partly, based on
performance requirements. This implies handling as the output criteria alter. In some cases, the
input is also modified to enable the transformation processor.
Output
This is the correct data, transmitted to the correct person at the correct moment and location.
Feedback
Feedback is efficiency information about a system. Feedback controls performance against a
norm in a cybernetic operation involving communication and control. After the output is
contrasted to quality norms, modifications can lead to feedback or handling and thus output.
Feedback may be good, bad, regular, or informative.
Control
It involves handling feedback and adopting the intervention. Management assistance is needed
to secure monitoring and promote the suggested shift in goals.
Operating system and associated software impact scheme behaviour in a computer system. In
system analysis, understanding the behaviour of the person controlling the region for which a
machine is regarded can create a distinction between success and failure of a setup.
That journey is one we'll focus on at particular moments to make sure we're heading in the
correct path and consider whether to create any adjustments to what we're doing or how we're
doing it and that’s done through research development frameworks in combination with learning
theories which we will discuss below.
Learning Theories
Learning is a process through which people gain the knowledge and understanding that they
can apply in the future.
Learning Theory describes how learners acquire, process and conserve the knowledge.
Cognitive, emotional, social and previous expertise factors all take a role in acquiring or
changing insight, the understanding and abilities of the world.[1][2]
Learning theories are classified into two main categories, Classical theorists and Modern
Theorists.
The classical theories of learning, The Theory of Plato and The Theory of Locke, also known as
Blank Slate Theory, try to provide an answer to the fundamental question i.e. How does an
individual learn something new when the topic is brand new to that person? These theories are
the basis of all modern learning theories.
● Reinforcement - Increases the likelihood that a response will occur in the future as a
result of a cue
Behavioural Learning
Based on observable behaviours (responses) that occur as a result of exposure to stimuli
Cognitive Learning
Learning based on mental information processing and often in response to problem-solving
Constructive Learning
Constructivism as a paradigm suggests that learning is an effective, positive method and that
helps to build the knowledge (Learning Theories - Constructivism, 2019).
Transformative Learning
Transformative learning theory suggests the "perspective development" method has three
characteristics: psychological (variations in self-understanding), convictional (modification of
belief systems) and cognitive (shifts in lifestyle) (Clark and Wilson, 1991).
In 1984, David Kolb published a paper describing his learning style model which we now know
as Kolb’s learning Theory. He later used that model to develop the inventory of his learning
styles.
Kolb’s learning theory is based on his experience and observation and connects with the
learner’s self cognitive processes. According to Kolb, learning includes acquiring abstract ideas
that can be implemented flexibly in various circumstances and new encounters provide
motivation for developing fresh ideas. The theory works on two levels:
1. Concrete experience
Concrete experience is the first stage in Kolb's experiential learning cycle. This is a stage in
which an individual, team or organisation are assigned a task. Practical or activity is a faster and
efficient way to learn. A person or a team can not understand by merely observing or reading
about something, they should carry some experiment or activity around it in order to learn
efficiently.
The activities could include, ice breakers, energisers, team games, problem-solving, discussion,
practical exercises, e.g. making a presentation and debates etc.
2. Reflective Observation
During this stage, the key of particular importance is to observe any inconsistencies between
experience and understanding which can lead to the New Experience (The Interaction Design
Foundation, 2019).
That implies getting back from doing and examining what has been accomplished and what has
been witnessed. Many questions are raised in this phase and lines of communication are
unlocked for other group participants.
At this stage, the activities may include presenting models, establish theories, present facts and
data etc.
4. Active Experimentation
This is the final stage where we put the findings and concepts established in previous stages to
a test through various activities or methods which may involve creating POC (Proof of Concept),
and role-playing etc.
According to Kolb, we can join the process at any point and pursue it through its logical
progression, but efficient teaching only happens when a learner can perform all four phases of
the model.
The strategy clarifies and concentrates group intervention and decision-making. It is based on
plans and decisions to mobilize individuals and can often be rewarded both for tangible
objectives and for attempting to achieve them. Ideally, it also includes active components that
can monitor and evaluate the internal atmosphere and feel when it requires modifications to
keep continuity and development.
Culture is an organization's tacit cultural command: it forms attitudes and conduct in a broad
and long-lasting way. Cultural standards describe what within a community is promoted,
discouraged, adopted or dismissed. Culture can unleash huge quantities of energy for a
common purpose and promote an organization's ability for prosperity if correctly matched with
its privacy principles, fuels and requires.
In reaction to altering possibilities and requirements, culture can also develop flexible and
autonomously. While the approach is typically determined by the C-suite, style can fluently
combine top officials ' plans with frontline workers ' understanding and expertise.
Final Words
Companies need to change and adopt different strategies during different stages of their life
span, these stages include:
● Startup Stage
● Maturity Stage
Corning is a company with a history spanning over three centuries and has a lifespan of 168
years. As a company, it is at the Maturity Stage for many decades. Surviving this long in the
industry and still remain relevant is no magic. It is a result of continuous evolution of process,
organisational culture and manufacturing methods.
While working on this paper, I got a chance to have a closer look at Corning in relationship with
different leadership and organisational models which lead me to understand the fact that how a
great leadership keeps an eye on changing environment and picks the opportunities from the
changing environment and adopt the new behaviours to turn the effect of the changing factors
into their favour.
Corning has a very strong Organizational Culture with its roots back in the 19th century and
strongly tied with innovation. Its leadership has been bold ever since the early 20th century
when Corning joined Eddison and created an innovative glass for his bulb experiments and later
helped him to bring the bulbs to mass public through their state of the art and innovative
production process.
The company's 168 years have been the innovations leader since its founding and are now
estimated at $27 billion. The firm began its voyage as a glass, Pyrex and Corningware maker,
are now manufacturing very sophisticated glass products for automobiles, fibre optics,
smartphones and software technology.
Corning's past involves inventions, and most of its inventions involve glass. People may think
glass as a single material, but not for Corning's Research and Development team. They
consider glass as a platform that can be adjusted and altered as needed.
References
1. Referenceforbusiness.com. (2019). Corning Inc. - Company Profile, Information,
Business Description, History, Background Information on Corning Inc.. [online]
Available at: https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/5/Corning-Inc.html
[Accessed 28 Jun. 2019].
3. Cmog.org. (2019). All About Glass | Corning Museum of Glass. [online] Available at:
https://www.cmog.org/article/glass-and-space-orbiter [Accessed 28 Jun. 2019].
4. Corning.com. (2019). How It Works: Corning’s Fusion Process. [online] Available at:
https://www.corning.com/in/en/innovation/the-glass-age/science-of-glass/how-it-works-
cornings-fusion-process.html [Accessed 28 Jun. 2019].
5. NobelPrize.org. (2019). The Nobel Prize in Physics 2009. [online] Available at:
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2009/kao/facts/ [Accessed 28 Jun. 2019].
6. Aamoth, D. and Aamoth, D. (2019). A Story About Steve Jobs, Steel Balls and Gorilla
Glass (You, with the Cracked Phone: Read This) | TIME.com. [online] TIME.com.
Available at: http://techland.time.com/2013/01/11/a-story-about-steve-jobs-steel-balls-
and-gorilla-glass-you-with-the-cracked-phone-read-this/ [Accessed 28 Jun. 2019].
7. Ravasi, D. and Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to Organizational Identity Threats:
Exploring the Role of Organizational Culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3),
pp.433-458.
9. Schein, E. (1988). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco [u.a.]: Jossey-
Bass.
10. Deal, T. and Kennedy, A. (2002). Corporate cultures. New York: Basic Books.
11. Kotter, J. (2011). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York, NY: Free Press.
12. Flamholtz, E. and Randle, Y. (2011). Corporate culture. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford
Business Books.
13. Explain that Stuff. (2019). What is glass? | How is glass made?. [online] Available at:
https://www.explainthatstuff.com/glass.html [Accessed 28 Jun. 2019].
15. SHRM. (2019). Creating an Effective Human Capital Strategy. [online] Available at:
https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/pages/0812boudreau.aspx [Accessed
28 Jun. 2019].
16. HCP at Corning. (2019). Human Capital Planning at Corning: More Than a Head Count.
[online] Available at: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/talent-
acquisition/pages/planningatcorning.aspx [Accessed 28 Jun. 2019].
21. The Interaction Design Foundation. (2019). What is Design Thinking and Why Is It So
Popular?. [online] Available at: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-
is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular [Accessed 28 Jun. 2019].