Successful Political Marketing: A Punjab Voter's Point of View
Successful Political Marketing: A Punjab Voter's Point of View
such as identification of needs of voters, segmentation of        Promotion is one of the most crucial parts of political
voters, planning and execution of different marketing             marketing campaign. The promotion mix broadly can be
programs etc. Political advertisement could be one of the         divided into two major parts. One is paid promotion which
most expensive and important among all those activities but       includes all types of advertisement be it broadcast, print,
it is not the only one. In nutshell it can be concluded that      poster, or the flourishing digital marketing. The other type
political marketing is use of marketing tools and techniques      is free promotion commonly known as publicity that
by any political setting.                                         political parties get but do not purchase (O’Shaughnessy,
                                                                  2002).
Further, from marketing point of view a politician or a            Usual to commercial market and growingly an important
political party is a service provider and voter/citizen must      element of political process, public relation, is an important
be viewed as a customer in political market place. A              tool applied to get positive attention of media for the
politician is different from the other service providers          organization.
because he operates in a complex environment that includes        Party symbols, slogan, colours give an added elements to
both controllable and uncontrollable factors[102]. Secondly       the entire communication mix.
he/she plays the role of both campaigner as well as the            E. Placement
service provider and thirdly the type and level of                The core of distribution or placement is chain of retailers or
communication used in politics are different from the one         distributors in case of commercial market. In politics the
used in commercial organizations.                                 identical form is party workers at grass root level. The
                                                                  political parties can arrange their membership at local or
 B. Political marketing mix                                       regional basis. The members of these parties provide
                                                                  volunteer labour and crucial inputs during the time of
From the literature mentioned previously the political            elections[27][31]. In addition this machinery also
marketing can be defined as:                                      coordinates with national level network to liaison local
                                                                  happenings and visits by leaders of the party. In India, it is
The candidate or political party application environment
                                                                  very important to keep in mind that family is very important
analysis and opinion research to develop and promote a
                                                                  that plays a very influential role in the voting process
product /offering which will assist to achieve objectives and
                                                                  (Farrell and Wortmann, 1987).
satisfy voter’s in return for their support.
The perceptions about “party image” are developed on the          Market Orientation in political marketing attracts great
basis of record in office, unity of purpose and recent history    interest as it provides likely perspective to win elections.
(Harrop and Shaw, 1990). The most important in building           Sometimes this strategy also increases concerns among
party image is policies of the party on which party               party members and other stakeholders having huge
manifesto is based. During last 3 decades researchers has         investments/ attachments to a specific candidate or party.
started placing more focus on rational choice belief of voter     These participants have their own perspectives of framing
judgment of the issues and choosing for the political party       policies and may be hesitant in changing party policies as
which is in synchronization with specific policy likings          per the research (Lees-Marshment, 2009).
(Himmelweit et al., 1985; Harrop, 1986). Nevertheless the          Many researchers (Newman, 1999; Lees-Marshment, 2001;
comprehensive scenario is not simple to change from image         Ormrod, 2005) conclude that a market orientation helps
of the political party to issues based clarification of voter’s   political party/ politician to be in touch with and reactive e
alternative because leader image also plays an important          to voter concerns.
part, which constructs the third element in product mix.          Ormod (2005) suggested a theoretical framework of market
 Active role played by media has assisted mitigating this         orientation based on behavior and attitude. As behavior,
tendency; as quoted by Philip Kotler “Voters hardly meet or       Ormod considered behavioral construct regarding
Know the political leaders; they only have transmitted            generation of information
images” (Kotler, 1982; O’Shaughnessy, 2002).                      and its distribution, with
                                                                  reference from Kohli and
 D. Promotion                                                     Jaworski (1990) research and
                                                                  believed them with consistent
                                                                  external communication and
                                                                1811
                                                                            Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP                                    Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
                                                                            & Sciences Publication
                                              International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)
                                                                 ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-7, Issue-6S5, April 2019
assessing own as well as competitors strengths and               A scientifically structured questionnaire based on extensive
weaknesses (Newman, 1999). Positioning is a tool which           review of literature and proposed research model was
enables a political                                              developed to find the relationship between dependent and
                                                                 independent variables. Five point Likert scale was used to
                                                                 measure each variable. Before the questionnaire was
party/candidate to create and communicate his image to the       finalized it was pretested. “Expert” pretest was done with
voters in a best possible way. In order to create a favourable   the help of ten academicians having in depth knowledge of
image and increase the support political strategists use         the subject area. The questionnaire was modified as per the
ideologies, issues, policies and reasoned arguments and          suggestions of experts. After that second pretest comprising
style of presentation to win the voter’s mind. Positioning is    50 respondents similar to the research group was conducted.
related with many things; the internal strengths and             To check the reliability the Cronbach’s Alpha was
capabilities of political parties/candidates must be evaluated   calculated and found to be .816 which is more than the
and should be matched with opportunities available in the        minimum acceptable limit (Nunnally, 1994). This shows
external environment of prospective target segments; and         that the consistency between items is adequate and
ultimately, positioning describe            the position of      researchers can go ahead with the final data collection.
party/candidate in the competition (Mauser, 1983;
Bradshaw, 1995 ; and O’Shaughnessy, 2002). The image of          B. Sampling and sampling technique
a candidate/political party is created with the usage of
media by highlighting some personality characteristics of        The questionnaire was filled by 350 voters selected from 10
the candidate and stressing various issues which are close to    districts of Punjab in the month of April and May 2017 to
the heart of voters (Newman, 1999)[8].                           measure their individual perceptions. The questionnaire was
 With reference to above discussion, the following               translated to the Punjabi language to become more
hypothesis can be framed.                                        understandable. Multistage sampling technique was used to
H4: Political marketing success positively influenced by         choose the sample. In the first stage stratified sampling
party/candidate positioning.                                     technique and in the second stage convenience sampling
                                                                 was used to select the respondents.
 K. Image management
 The positioning theory for image management was                        VI. HYPOTHSIS TESTING AND RESULTS
developed by Schoenwald (1987). In the revolutionary
                                                                 Several tests were performed to examine the suitability of
research on political marketing, Mauser (1983) keeps the
                                                                 the data for multiple regression. To ensure that no
concept of image at the centre of his work[87].
                                                                 multicollinearity exists among variables variance inflation
The process of managing image has been applied by the
                                                                 factor (VIF) was used. To test the tolerance vales for
political parties/candidates to create modified images that
                                                                 independent variable, tolerance test was used. High degree
more precisely coordinate with their new constituencies. In
                                                                 of multicollinearity results in inaccurate estimation of
Marketing ideology can be seen as a labeling process
                                                                 regression coefficients and difficulty in distinguishing the
identical in the nature used for branding the products.
                                                                 impact of independent variables on the dependent variables
Majority of the people use ideology to label       political
                                                                 (Hair et al., 1998). Any variable with value of VIF above 10
parties/candidates and themselves and then establish a
                                                                 and with a tolerance value below .10 will be correlated
relation between them and political party/candidate by
                                                                 more than .90 with other variables, which is indication of
using this information. These labels are same as developed
                                                                 multicollinearity problem (Hair et al., 1998). Table II have
for the products by marketers to build an image which
                                                                 the result of multicollinearity test.
describe what they meant for in customers mind (Newman,
1999). Decision on the image of candidate is one of the                                     Table-II
important decisions in political campaigns that dominate
how the organizers of campaign wish people to perceive                       Variable          Tolerance     VIF
about the personality of the candidate. Image statement is                    Market
the base on which political parties/ candidates shape their                 Orientation          0.634       1.577
                                                                         Market Research          0.65       1.539
campaigns. Critical is how to change the core message to                      Market
distinct target groups. On some occasions, voters are                    Segmentation and
interested in serious discussion on problems, on other                       Targeting           0.849       1.178
occasions they may want to hear slogans and what they                       Positioning          0.671       1.491
want to hear (Juholin, 2001).                                              Building and
                                                                             Managing
 With reference to above discussion, the following                        Favourable and
hypothesis can be framed[32].                                              Strong Image          0.794       1.26
H5: Political marketing success positively influenced by
building and managing a strong image.
                                                                 The above table shows that VIF value of all the variables
            V.    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY                           range from 1.178 to 1.577
                                                                 which is less than 10, and
Cross sectional research study used to explain the influence     tolerance value ranges from
of independent variables on success of political marketing.      .634 to .849 which are
                                                                 greater than .10. The results
A. Data collection tool                                          clearly show the absence of
  The data was also checked for normal distribution with the                Table V
  help of skewness test. The data is normally distributed if
                                                                                  Hypothesis
                                                                                                                t
                                                                                                      Beta    value   Significance   Comment
                                                                                 H1:      Political
  skewness has a value of less than 1. In other words                           marketing
  normality of data is defined as a “range of scores than                       success
                                                                                positively
  stretches either side of 0” (Hair et al., 1998). Table III                    influenced by
  indicates the result of skewness.                                             application of
                                                                                market
  Table III                                                                     orientation
                                                                                strategy.             0.163   2.73       0.007        Accept
                                                                                H2:       Political
                  Variables                            Skewness                 marketing
                                                                                success
   Successful Political Marketing                        -.322                  positively
                                                                                influenced by
                                                                                conducting
   Market Orientation                                    -.428
                                                                                efficient
                                                                                marketing
   Market Research                                       -.409                  research.             0.191   3.245      0.001        Accept
                                                                                H3:       Political
   Market Segmentation and Targeting                     -.563                  marketing
                                                                                success
                                                                                positively
   Party candidate positioning                           -.451                  influenced by
                                                                                market
   Building and Managing Favourable                      -.467                  segmentation
                                                                                                                -
   and Strong Image                                                             and targeting.
                                                                                                      -0.03   0.536      0.592        Reject
                                                                                H4:      Political
  The above results clearly indicate that the data is normally                  marketing
                                                                                success
  distributed as skewness value is less than 1 in case of all the
                                                                                positively
  variables.                                                                    influenced by
                                                                                party/candidate
  Table IV                                                                      positioning.          0.07    1.211      0.227        Reject
                                                                                H5:      Political
  Fitness of Model for Regressions Analysis                                     marketing
                                                                                success
     Mode     R      R        Adjuste   Std.       F      Significanc           positively
     l               Squar    dR        Error of          e                     influenced by
                     e        Square    the                                     building      and
                                        Estimat                                 managing         a
                                        e                                       strong image.
                                                                                                      0.252   4.718        0          Accept
     1        0.4                                  21.               0
               9      0.244    0.233    0.63368     6
                                                                         1813
                                                                                     Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP                                             Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
                                                                                     & Sciences Publication
                                               International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)
                                                                  ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-7, Issue-6S5, April 2019
     marketing. This finding is also in line with what            parties/candidates and political campaigns are basically used
     (Kleinman, 1987; Worcester, 1991; Newman, 1999;              by political parties/candidates to make their political
     and O’Shaughnessy, 2002) found in their studies.             “product” more acceptable to target market.
     Results show that people participate in surveys and
     opinion polls conducted by political parties before           For this political parties should adopt a market oriented
     election.                                                    approach which involves identifying the target market needs
                                                                  and design their products as per their needs[15]. Also there is
                                                                  need to modify their policies according to the changing needs
                                                                  and wants of the voters. Offerings should be positioned in
  3) Market segmentation and targeting do not have                such a way that their offering can be identified different from
       significant effect on the successful political             the competitors. Further political parties/candidates should
       marketing. This result is contradictory with earlier       adopt relevant tools to attract their target segments. Market
       findings (Yorke and Meehan, 1986; Miller et al.,           segmentation and targeting are beneficial tools to reach
       1990; Smith and Saunders, 1990; Newman, 1999;              voter’s effectively but somehow political parties/candidates in
       Bannon, 2004; Lees-Marshment and Roberts, 2005).           Punjab ignore this and people perceive that political
       This also means that voters in Punjab do not believe       parties/candidate segment the voters and target voters with
       that political parties divide voters on geographic,        product suitable for each segment. So political parties should
       demographic, psychological or behavioral basis. In         pay more attention to segment the voters and design specific
       addition results was negative (B=-.028) meaning            products for each segment. Political parties/candidates should
       there by voters do not know or do not understand the       use all the opportunities to position in the minds of voters as
       meaning of segmentation and targeting                      voters in Punjab believe that they are week on this aspect.
  4) Positioning does not have significant effect on the          Further parties/candidates should do their best to build and
       successful political marketing. This result is             maintain a favourable and strong image in the minds of the
       contradictory with earlier findings (Mauser, 1983;         voters as it is found that Punjab voters perceive image is a key
       Fletcher, 1984; Smith and Saunders, 1990; Newman,          element for successful political marketing. As creditability is a
       1999; O’Shaughnessy, 2002). It also means that             key for successful political marketing, so political
       voters     in     Punjab    believe      that  political   parties/candidates should create image of high credibility
       parties/candidates do not make efforts to position         among the voters.
       themselves in the minds of voters[24]. Political
       parties must look into it and make all the possible            VIII.    LIMITATIONS                    AND     FUTURE
       efforts to position effectively in the minds of                         RESEARCH
       voters[6].
  5) Finally managing and building a strong and                   There are few possible limitations in the empirical and
       favourable image was found to have significant             conceptual work reported in this research paper. The
       effect on the successful political marketing. This         conceptual model (figure 1) mentioned herein was
       result is similar to previous studies (Newman, 1999;       developed from the literature only and empirical testing has
       Juholin, 2001). Voters appear to be very much              not been done. This is obviously the next step and
       interested in party/candidate image. It was also found     qualitative research seems to be the most pertinent way of
       that voters feel that candidate/ parties make continues    testing and improving the model. For example, focus group
       efforts in improving their image basically when            research may be used to examine whether the model
       citizens are more informed and consider image while        includes all the factors affecting successful political
       voting in elections[5].                                    marketing. An identical qualitative approach can be used to
     Many factors are there that influence successful             examine additional moderating influences on the successful
    political marketing as felt by voters in Punjab. In           political marketing. For example the role of money and
    explaining variance in the dependent variable these           muscle power on successful political marketing not
    factors are Building and managing a favourable and            investigated.
    strong image followed by conducting an efficient
                                                                  Once the model has been fully developed, the influence of
    market research and applying a market oriented
                                                                  independent variables on dependent variable (successful
    strategy. On the other hand factors that have not any
                                                                  political marketing) may be more fully explored. Of the
    significant effect on successful political marketing are
                                                                  specific interest is how political party/candidate can create
    market segmentation and targeting and party/candidate
                                                                  credible image in the minds of voters. Will voters believe
    positioning[63].
                                                                  the efforts to create or change an image as signaled by
                                                                  leader if the lower level workers and leaders appear largely
               VII. DISCUSSION ON FINDINGS
                                                                  unchanged? This is an issue faced by political parties in
This paper tried to indicate the usefulness of commercial         Punjab.In addition, although factors affecting successful
marketing tools political marketing area. A model based on        political marketing have been identified, we are not sure
review of literature was used to find out the factors that may    about the relative importance
influence the successful political marketing. It has emerged as   of these factors in terms of
interdisciplinary approach which involves the application of      voting      behaviour.     For
marketing tools in politics. Political marketing is an            example market orientation
instrument that helps to develop favorable political              has a great influence on
campaigns. Connecting with the voters is crucial for political    party/candidate choice then
                                                                  image is? Do different
                                                             1814        Published By:
                                                                         Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
        Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP                         & Sciences Publication
                                      Successful Political Marketing: A Punjab Voter’s Point of View
  segments of voters have different influencing factors?                             19. Henneberg, S.C.M. (2003), Generic Functions of Political
                                                                                         Marketing Management, Working paper series 2003.19,
                                                                                         University of Bath, School of Management.
  The identified factors that influence successful political                         20. Henneberg, S.C.M. (2004), Political Marketing Theory:
  marketing needs to be treated with caution as it applicability                         Hendiadyoin or Oxymoron,Working paper series 2004.01,
  to the wider Indian electoral scene is yet to be proved. As                            University of Bath School of Management.
  such further research to test and replicate the factors is still                   21. Himmelweit, H., Humphreys, P. and Jaeger, M. (1985), How
                                                                                         Voters Decide, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
  required. Also bearing in mind wider research                                      22. Juholin, E. (2001), “Image or substance? Candidate or
                                                                                         campaign? A case of a presidential election campaign in
                                                                                         Finland”, Corporate communication, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 1356-
                                                                                         3289.
                                                                                     23. Kavanagh, D. (1995), Election Campaigning: The New
                                                                                         Marketing of Politics, Blackwell, Oxford.
                                                                                     24. Kleinman, P. (1987), “The research market: did psychographics
  opportunities, it is not recommended that factors be used                              win the general election?”,Admap (September), pp. 16-8.
  unchanged in other states or countries.                                            25. Kohli, A. and Jaworski, B. (1990), “Market orientation: the
                                                                                         construct, research propositions, andmanagerial implications”,
  Overall the research paper draw attention to just how much                             Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 1-18.
  is not understood in this area and the scope of further                            26. Kolovos, I. and Harris, P. (2005), “Political marketing and
                                                                                         political communication: therelationship revisited”, available at:
  research in the areas identified above is huge. Given the                              http://eprints.otago.ac.nz/32/1/pm-pc.pdf
  identified factors influence on voting intention, in future,                       27. Kotler, P. (1982), Marketing for Non-Profit Organization, 2nd
  more sophisticated research into different factors role in                             ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  politics is justified.                                                             28. Kotler, P. and Keller, K. (2009), Marketing Management, 13th
                                                                                         ed., Prentice Hall, Upper SaddleRiver, NJ.
                                                                                     29. Lees-Marshment, J. (2001a), Political Marketing and British
  REFERENCES                                                                             Political Parties: The Party’s JustBegun, Manchester University
                                                                                         Press, Manchester.
       1.    Baines, P.R. and Egan, J. (2001), “Marketing and political              30. Lees-Marshment, J. (2001b), “The marriage of politics and
             campaign: mutually exclusive orexclusively mutual”,                         marketing”, Political Studies, Vol. 49,pp. 692-713.
             Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 4           31. Lees-Marshment, J. (2005), “The marketing campaign: the
             No. 1,pp. 76-90.                                                            British general election of 2005”,
       2.    Baines, P.R., Harris, P. and Lewis, B.R. (2002), “The political         32. Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 21 Nos 9/10, pp. 1151-
             marketing planning process:improving image and message in                   60.
             strategic target areas”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol.        33. Lees-Marshment, J. (2008), “Comprehensive political
             20 No. 1, pp. 25-33.                                                        marketing: global political parties, strategy
       3.    Bannon, D.P. (2004), Marketing Segmentation and Political               34. and behavior”, in Sargeant, A. and Wymer, W. (Eds), The
             Marketing, Political StudiesAssociation, University of Lincoln,             Routledge Companion to Non-Profit Marketing, Chapter 19 i,
             4-8 April.                                                                  Routledge, pp. 316-29.
       4.    Bradshaw, J. (1995), “Who will vote for you and why:                    35. Lees-Marshment, J. (2009), “Marketing after the election: the
             designing strategy and theme”, inThurber, J.A. and Nelson, C.               potential and limitations of maintain a market orientation in
             (Eds), Campaigns and Elections: American Style, West                        government”, Canadian Journal of Communication, Vol. 34 No.
             viewPress, Boulder, CO.                                                     2, pp. 205-27.
       5.    Brennan, R. and Henneberg, S. (2008), “Does political                   36. Lock, A. and Harris, P. (1996), “Political marketing”, European
             marketing need the concept of customervalue?”, Marketing                    Journal of Marketing, Vol. 30Nos 10/11, pp. 14-24.
             Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 559-72.                     37. McCarthy, E.J. (1960), Basic Marketing, Richard D. Irwin,
       6.    Butler, P. and Collins, B. (1994), “Political marketing: structure          Homewood, IL.
             and process”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 1,             38. Maarek, P.J. (1995), Political Communication and
             pp. 19-34.                                                                  Communication, John Libbey, London.
       7.    Butler, P. and Collins, N. (1996), “Strategic analysis in political     39. Mauser, G.A. (1983), Political Marketing: An Approach to
             markets”, European Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 30 Nos 10/11,                  Campaign Strategy, Praeger,New York, NY.
             pp. 19-34.                                                              40. Menon, S.V. (2009), “Political marketing: a conceptual
       8.    Dean, D. and Croft, R. (2001), “Friends and relations: long-                framework”, MPRA Paper No. 12547,Munich University
             term approaches to politicalcampaign”, European Journal of                  Library.
             Marketing, Vol. 30 Nos 10/11, pp. 1197-216.                             41. Mensah, K. (2007), “Kwane Nkrumah and political marketing:
       9.    Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper                   locating campaign strategyin modern political campaigning”,
             and Row, New York, NY.                                                      The Journal of Pan African Studies, Vol. 1 No. 8,pp. 93-113.
       10.   Dunleavy, P. (1990), Reinventing Parliament: Making the                 42. Miller, W., Clarke, H.D., Harrop, M., Leduc, L. and Whiteley,
             Commons More Effective Part 2:                                              P.F. (1990), How Voters Change: The 1987 British election
       11.   Practical Reforms to Make The Commons More Effective,                       campaign in perspective, Oxford, Clarendon.
             Charter 88, London.                                                     43. Newman, B.I. (Ed.) (1999), “A predictive model of voter
       12.   Farrell, D.M. and Wortmann, M. (1987), “Party strategies in the             behaviour: the repositioning of BillClinton, Handbook of
             electoral market: political                                                 Political Marketing, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 259-82.
       13.   marketing in West Germany, Britain and Ireland”, European               44. Newman, B.I. (2001), “Commentory-image-manufacturing in
             Journal of Political Research,Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 297-318.                   the USA: recent US presidentialelections and beyond”,
       14.   Fletcher, W. (1984), Commercial Breaks: Insights into                       European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 966-70.
             Advertising and Marketing, Advertising                                  45. Niffenegger, P. (1989), “Strategies for success from political
       15.   Press, London.                                                              marketers”, Journal of ConsumerMarketing, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp.
       16.   Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (1998),                    115-51.
             Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River,          46. O’Cass, A. (1996), “Political marketing concept”, European
             NJ.                                                                         Journal of Marketing, Vol.
       17.   Harrop, M. (1986), “Voting and the electorate”, in Drucker, H.              30Nos 10/11, pp. 45-61.
             et al. (Eds), Developments in British Politics, Macmillan,              47. O’Cass, A. (2001), “Political
             London.                                                                     marketing – an investigation
       18.   Harrop, M. (1990), “Political marketing”, Parliamentary                     of the political marketing
             Affairs, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 277-92.                                         concept andpolitical market
                                                                                         orientation     in    Australian
                                                                                         politics”, European Journal of
                                                                              1815
                                                                                        Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP                                                Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
                                                                                        & Sciences Publication
                                                  International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)
                                                                     ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-7, Issue-6S5, April 2019
    Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 1003-25.                                 74. Hayes, B. and McAllister, I. (1996), “Marketing politics to
48. O’Cass, A. (2002), “Political advertising believability and                   voters: late deciders in the 1992 British election”, European
    information source value duringelections”, Journal of                         Journal of Marketing, Vol. 30 Nos 10/11, pp. 309-566.
    Advertising, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 63-74.                                    75. Hayes, B. and McAllister, L. (2001), “Women, electoral
49. Ormrod, R.P. (2005), “A conceptual model of political market                  volatility and political outcomes inBritain”, European Journal
    orientation”, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing,                 of Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 971-83.
    Vol. 4 Nos 1/2, pp. 47-64.                                                76. Jackson, N. (2007), “Political parties, the internet and the 2005
50. O’Shaughnessy, N. (2001), “The marketing of political                         general election: third time lucky?” Internet Research, Vol. 17
    marketing”, European Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10,                   No. 3, pp. 1066-2243.
    pp. 1047-57.                                                              77. Kotler, P. and Kotler, N. (1981), “Business marketing for
51. O’Shaughnessy, N. (2002), “Towards an ethical framework for                   political candidates”, Campaigns andElections (Summer), pp.
    political marketing”, Psychologyand Marketing, Vol. 19 No.                    24-33.
    12, pp. 1079-94.                                                          78. Newman, B.I. and Sheth, J.N. (1984), “The gender gap in voter
52. Osuagwu, L. (2008), “Political marketing: conceptualization,                  attitudes and behavior: someadvertising implications”, Journal
    dimensions and research agenda”,Marketing Intelligence &                      of Advertising, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 4-16.
    Planning, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 793-810.                                     79. Newman, B.I. (1994), The Marketing of the President: Political
                                                                                  Marketing as Campaign Strategy, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
                                                                              80. Peng, N. and Hackley, C. (2007), “Political marketing
53. Qualter, T. (1985), Opinion Control in the Democracies,                       communications planning in the UK and Taiwan”, Marketing
    Hampshire, Boston, MA.                                                        Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 483-98.
54. Rees, P. and Gardner, H. (2005), “Political marketing                     81. Peng, N. and Hackley, C. (2009), “Are voters, consumers?”,
    segmentation – the case of UK localgovernment”, Journal of                    Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 171-86.
    Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 4 Nos 1/2, pp. 169-             82. Rothschild, M.L. (1978), “Political Advertising: a neglected
    84.                                                                           policy issue in marketing”, Journal of marketing research, Vol.
55. Scammell, M. (1999), “Political marketing: lessons for political              15 No. 1, pp. 58-71.
    science”, Political Studies, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 718-39.                   83. Stephen, D. and Hughes, A. (2008), “Australian political
56. Schoenwald, M. (1987), “Marketing a political candidate”,                     marketing after Kevin 07: lessons from the 2007 federal
    Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 4, pp. 57-63.                             election”, Monash Business Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 34-7.
57. Sekaran, U. (2004), Organizational Behavior: Text and Cases,              84. Waller, S.D. and Polonsky, J.M. (1996), “Advice for handling
    2nd ed., Tata McGraw Hill Companies, New Delhi.                               controversial accounts: from product to politicians”, Marketing
58. Smith, G. and Hirst, A. (2001), “Strategic political era of                   Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 21-8.
    political marketing”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35
    Nos 9/10, pp. 1058-73.
59. Smith, G. and Saunders, J. (1990), “The application of                                        AUTHORS PROFILE
    marketing to British politics”, Journal ofMarketing
    Management, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 295-306.                                          Krishan Gopal is working as an Assistant Professor at Mittal
60. Thrassou, A., Vrontis, D. and McDonald, M.H.B. (2009), “A                                 School of Business (ACBSP, USA Accredited),
    marketing communicationsframework for small political parties              Author-1       Lovely Professional University, Punjab. He has 12
    in developed countries”, Marketing Intelligence &Planning,                  Photo         years of teaching experience. His expertise entails
    Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 268-92.                                                                areas    like   Political  Marketing,     Strategic
61. Worcester, R. (1991), British Public Opinion, Blackwell,                                  Management, Business Simulations and Marketing
    Oxford, available at: http://EzineArticles.com/875572                                     Management. He is actively involved in academic
62. Worcester, R.M. and Baines, P.R. (2004), Two Triangulation                      research.
    Models in Political Marketing: TheMarket Positioning
    Analogy. Elections on the Horizon Conference, British Library,                               Dr. Rajesh Verma is working as Professor and
    London.                                                                     Author-          Additional Dean at Mittal School of Business
63. Wring, D.P. (1996), “Political marketing and party                          2Photo           (ACBSP, USA Accredited), Lovely Professional
    development in Britain”, European Journal ofMarketing, Vol.                                  University, Punjab. He has 17 years of teaching
    30 Nos 10/11, pp. 100-11.                                                                    experience. His expertise entails areas like
64. Yorke, D. and Meehan, S.A. (1986), “ACORN in the political                                  Marketing Orientation, Business Models, Political
    marketplace”, European Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 20 No. 8,           Marketing, Marketing Research and Marketing Management and research
    pp. 73-86.                                                           interests includes critical perspective on application of marketing theory
65. Further readingAndrews, L. (1996), “The relationship of              like value creation through innovative and contemporary media.
    political marketing to political lobbying”, EuropeanJournal of
    Marketing, Vol. 30 Nos 10/11, pp. 76-90.                                                      Ajay Chandel is working as an Assistant
66. Bowers-Brown, J. and Gunter, B. (2002), “Political election”,                   Author-       Professor at Mittal School of Business (ACBSP,
    Aslib Proceeding, Vol. 54 No. 3,pp. 166-76.                                     3Photo        USA      Accredited),    Lovely     Professional
67. Bowler, S., Domovan, J. and Fernandez, K. (1996), “The                                        University, Punjab He has 10 years of academic
    growth of the political marketing                                                             experience      of        teaching Strategy and
68. industry and California initiative process”, European Journal of                              Branding. He has research interest in areas like
    Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 10,pp. 166-78.                                Strategy, Branding and E-commerce.
69. Butler, P. and Collins, N. (2001), “Payment on delivery –
    recognizing constituency service aspolitical marketing”,
    European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 32-44.
70. Haley, G., Bajaj, M. and Rust, R.T. (1984), “Efficient and
    inefficient media for political campaign advertising”, Journal of
    Advertising, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 45-9.
71. Harris, P. (2001), “Commentory-machiavelli, political
    marketing and reinvesting government”,European Journal of
    Marketing, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, pp. 1136-54.
72. Harris, P., Lock, A. and O’Shaughnessy, N. (1999), “Measuring
    the effect of political advertising and the case of the 1995 Irish
    Divorce Referendum”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol.
    17 No. 6, pp. 272-9.
73. Harris, P. and Ward, M. (2005), “Marketing the mayor: political
    marketing and Livingstone4London mayoral election
    campaign”, Government and Public Affairs.
                                                            1817
                                                                       Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP                               Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
                                                                       & Sciences Publication
                                  Successful Political Marketing: A Punjab Voter’s Point of View
                                                                1
                                                                       Published By:
Retrieval Number:F13240476S519/19©BEIESP                               Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
                                                                       & Sciences Publication