Scribd
Upload
420 views2 pages

Lazatin V HRET Digest

This case involves a dispute over the election results for a seat in the House of Representatives from Pampanga province. During the canvassing of votes, a candidate objected and filed cases with the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) challenging the proclamation of his opponent as winner. The COMELEC initially suspended the proclamation but later allowed it to proceed. The losing candidate then filed a case with the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) contesting the election results. The issue is whether the HRET has jurisdiction over the case. The Supreme Court ruled that based on the Constitution, the HRET has sole and exclusive jurisdiction over all election contests involving House seats.

Uploaded by

Clarisa Natividad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
420 views2 pages

Lazatin V HRET Digest

This case involves a dispute over the election results for a seat in the House of Representatives from Pampanga province. During the canvassing of votes, a candidate objected and filed cases with the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) challenging the proclamation of his opponent as winner. The COMELEC initially suspended the proclamation but later allowed it to proceed. The losing candidate then filed a case with the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) contesting the election results. The issue is whether the HRET has jurisdiction over the case. The Supreme Court ruled that based on the Constitution, the HRET has sole and exclusive jurisdiction over all election contests involving House seats.

Uploaded by

Clarisa Natividad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

CARMELO F. LAZATIN v.

HRET,
G.R. No. 84297

December 8, 1988

FACTS:

Petitioner and private respondent were among the candidates for


Representative of the first district of Pampanga during the elections of May 11, 1987.
During the canvassing of the votes, private respondent objected to the inclusion of
certain election returns. But since the Municipal Board of Canvassers did not rule on
his objections, he brought his case to the Commission on Elections. On May 19, 1987,
the COMELEC ordered the Provincial Board of Canvassers to suspend the
proclamation of the winning candidate for the first district of Pampanga. However,
on May 26, 1987, the COMELEC ordered the Provincial Board of Canvassers to
proceed with the canvassing of votes and to proclaim the winner. On May 27, 1987,
petitioner was proclaimed as Congressman-elect. Private respondent thus filed in
the COMELEC a petition to declare petitioners proclamation void ab initio. Later,
private respondent also filed a petition to prohibit petitioner from assuming office.
The COMELEC failed to act on the second petition so petitioner was able to assume
office on June 30, 1987. On September 15, 1987, the COMELEC declared petitioner's
proclamation void ab initio. Petitioner challenged the COMELEC resolution before
this Court in a petition entitled "Carmelo F. Lazatin v. The Commission on Elections,
Francisco R. Buan, Jr. and Lorenzo G. Timbol," docketed as G.R. No. 80007. In a
decision promulgated on January 25, 1988, the Court set aside the COMELEC's
revocation of petitioner's proclamation. On February 8, 1988, private respondent
filed in the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal.

ISSUE:

Whether or not the House of Representative Electoral Tribunal has jurisdiction


over the case?

RULING:

Yes, the HRET has Jurisdiction over the case.


SECTION 17. The Senate and the House of Representatives shall each have an
Electoral Tribunal, which shall be the sole judge of all contests relating to the
election, returns, and qualifications of their respective Members. Each Electoral
Tribunal shall be composed of nine Members, three of whom shall be Justices of the
Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice, and the remaining six shall be
Members of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, who
shall be chosen on the basis of proportional representation from the political parties
and the parties or organizations registered under the party-list system represented
therein. The senior Justice in the Electoral Tribunal shall be its Chairman.

The power of the HRET, as the sole judge of all contests relating to the election,
returns and qualifications of the Members of the House of Representatives, to
promulgate rules and regulations relative to matters within its jurisdiction, including
the period for filing election protests before it, is beyond dispute. Its rule-making
power necessarily flows from the general power granted it by the Constitution.
.

You might also like