Focus On IMO: SOLAS: The International Convention For The Safety of Life at Sea, 1974
Focus On IMO: SOLAS: The International Convention For The Safety of Life at Sea, 1974
International Maritime Organization, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7735 7611 Fax: +44 (0)20 7587 3210
Contacts: Lee Adamson – Senior External Relations Officer; Natasha Brown – External Relations Officer
E-mail: media@imo.org Web site: www.imo.org
These documents are for background information. Please refer to the website www.imo.org
for up-to-date information.
October 1998
2
It was originally intended that the 1960 SOLAS Convention would be kept up to date by means of
amendments. The first set was adopted in 1966 and from then on amendments were introduced regularly.
Their contents are summarized below:
1966: amendments to Chapter II, dealing with special fire safety measures for passenger ships.
1967: six amendments adopted, dealing with fire safety measures and arrangements for life-saving
appliances on certain tankers and cargo ships; VHF radiotelephony in areas of high traffic density; novel types
of craft; and the repair modification and outfitting of ships.
1968: new requirements introduced into Chapter V dealing with shipborne navigational equipment, the use
of automatic pilot and the carriage of nautical publications.
1969: various amendments adopted, dealing with such matters as firefighters' outfits and personal
equipment in cargo ships; specifications for lifebuoys and lifejackets; radio installations and shipborne
navigational equipment.
1971: regulations amended concerning radiotelegraphy and radiotelephony and routeing of ships.
1973: regulations concerning life-saving appliances; radiotelegraph watches; pilot ladders and hoists. The
major amendment was a complete revision of Chapter VI which deals with the carriage of grain.
Unfortunately, it became increasingly apparent as the years went by that these efforts to respond to the
lessons learnt from major disasters and keep the SOLAS Convention in line with technical developments were
doomed to failure - because of the nature of the amendment procedure adopted at the 1960 conference. This
stipulated that amendments would enter into force twelve months after being accepted by two-thirds of
Contracting Parties to the parent Convention.
This procedure had been perfectly satisfactory in the past when most international treaties were ratified
by a relatively small number of countries. But during the 1960s the membership of the United Nations and
international organizations such as IMO was growing rapidly. More and more countries had secured their
independence and many of them soon began to build up their merchant fleets. The number of Parties to the
SOLAS Convention grew steadily. This meant that the number of ratifications required to meet the two-thirds
target needed to secure entry into force of SOLAS amendments also increased. It became clear that it would
take so long for these amendments to become international law that they would be out of date before they did
so.
As a result IMO decided to introduce a new SOLAS Convention which would not only incorporate all the
amendments to the 1960 Convention so far adopted but would also include a new procedure which would
enable future amendments to be brought into force within an acceptable period of time.
Tacit acceptance
As explained earlier, the amendment procedure incorporated in the 1960 Convention stipulated that an
amendment would only enter into force when it had been accepted by two-thirds of Contracting
Governments. It therefore required Contracting Governments to take positive action to accept the
amendment. This usually meant that acceptance was delayed pending introduction of the necessary national
legislation and this was not always given high priority by Governments, particularly as the pace of acceptance
by other States was slow.
The 1974 Convention endeavours to solve this problem by in effect reversing the process: it assumes that
Governments are in favour of the amendment unless they take positive action to make their objection known.
Article VIII states that amendments to the chapters (other than chapter I) of the Annex, which contain
the Convention's technical provisions - shall be deemed to have been accepted within two years (or a different
period fixed at the time of adoption) unless they are rejected within a specified period by one-third of
3
Contracting Governments or by Contracting Governments whose combined merchant fleets represent not less
than 50 per cent of world gross tonnage.
The article contains other provisions for entry into force of amendments including the explicit acceptance
procedure but in practice the tacit acceptance procedure described above proves the most rapid and effective
way of securing the entry into force of amendments to the technical annex (other than Chapter I) and is now
invariably used.
The Annex
Chapter I: General provisions
The most important of these concern the surveys required for various types of ships and the issuing of
documents signifying that ships meet the requirements of the Convention.
The survey requirements for passenger ships include a survey before the ship is put into service; a
periodical survey (in most cases once every 12 months) and additional surveys as the occasion arises. In the
case of cargo ships, after the initial survey, the ship is subject to a subsequent survey every two years in
respect of life-saving appliances and other equipment; once every year in respect of radio installation; and in
respect of hull, machinery and equipment, at such intervals as the Administration may consider necessary to
ensure that the ship's condition is in all respects satisfactory.
Regulation 12 of Chapter I lists the various certificates which have to be issued by the flag State as proof
that a ship has been inspected and found to be in compliance with the requirements of the Convention. The
certificates cover Passenger Ship Safety, Cargo Ship Safety Construction, Cargo Ship Safety Equipment and
Cargo Ship Safety Radio certificates. There is also an Exemption Certificate which is issued when an
exemption from requirements is granted by the flag State.
The control procedures laid down in Regulation 19 of this chapter are primarily designed to enable port
State officers to ensure that foreign ships calling at their ports possess valid certificates. In most cases,
possession of valid certificates is sufficient proof that the ship concerned complies with Convention
requirements.
The port State officer is empowered to take further action if there are clear grounds for believing that the
condition of the ship or of its equipment does not correspond substantially with the particulars of any of the
certificates.
The officer can take steps to ensure that the ship does not sail until it can do so without endangering
passengers, crew or the ship itself. If action of this type is taken, the flag State must be informed of the
circumstances and the facts must also be reported to IMO.
Chapter II-1: Construction - subdivision and stability, machinery and electrical installations
The subdivision of passenger ships into watertight compartments must be such that after assumed damage to
the ship's hull the vessel will remain afloat in a stable position. Requirements for the watertight integrity and
bilge pumping arrangements for passenger ships are also laid down.
The degree of subdivision - measured by the maximum permissible distance between two adjacent
bulkheads - varies with the ship's length and the service in which it is engaged. The highest degree of
subdivision applies to ships of the greatest length primarily engaged in the carriage of passengers.
The requirements for machinery and electrical installations are designed to ensure that services which are
essential for the safety of the ship, passengers and crew are maintained under various emergency conditions.
Chapter II-2: Construction - Fire protection, fire detection and fire extinction
Casualties to passenger ships through fire in the early 1960s emphasized the need to improve the fire
protection provisions of the 1960 Convention, and in 1966 and 1967 amendments were adopted by the IMO
Assembly. These and other amendments, particularly detailed fire safety provisions for passenger ships,
4
tankers and combination carriers, have been incorporated in this chapter, including requirements for inert gas
systems in tankers.
These provisions are based on the following principles:
1. Division of the ship into main and vertical zones by thermal and structural boundaries.
2. Separation of accommodation spaces from the remainder of the ship by thermal and structural
boundaries.
3. Restricted use of combustible materials.
4. Detection of any fire in the zone of origin.
5. Containment and extinction of any fire in the space of origin.
6. Protection of the means of escape or of access for fire-fighting purposes.
7. Ready availability of fire-extinguishing appliances.
8. Minimization of the possibility of ignition of flammable cargo vapour.
5
Each ship must carry a document of authorization, grain loading stability data and associated plans of loading.
6
gross tonnage and above must have two radars, each capable of operating independently. Requirements
for operation and testing of steering gear were also introduced (Chapter V).
6. All tankers of 10,000 gross tonnage and above must have two remote steering gear control systems, each
operable separately from the navigating bridge (Chapter II-1).
7. The main steering gear of new tankers of 10,000 gross tonnage and above must comprise two or more
identical power units, and be capable of operating the rudder with one or more units (Chapter II-1).
8. A number of important regulations designed to improve the survey and certification of ships were also
adopted. These include modifications to the provisions relating to the intervals of surveys and
inspections and the introduction of intermediate surveys of life-saving appliances and other equipment of
cargo ships and, in the case of hull, machinery and equipment, periodical surveys for cargo ships and
intermediate surveys for tankers of ten years of age and over. Unscheduled inspections and mandatory
annual surveys were also introduced. Furthermore the port State control provisions were rewritten
(Chapter I).
7
IMO's Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) because of their importance to the safety of bulk carriers and
passenger ships in particular.
One of the most important changes affects regulation 56 (Location and separation of spaces in tankers)
which was completely rewritten. One section of the new regulation applies specifically to combination
carriers.
The revised Chapter III was increased from 38 regulations to 53 and retitled "Life-saving appliances and
arrangements". The main changes were to ensure operational readiness of ships and the safe abandonment
survival, detection and retrieval of survivors.
The requirements of the revised chapter applied to new ships the keels of which were laid on or after 1
July 1986 (the date of entry into force of the 1983 amendments). A few requirements, mostly dealing with
life-saving appliance operations and drills, also applied to existing ships as from 1 July 1986. Some
requirements, including those for the carriage of additional liferafts, life-saving radio equipment, lifejacket
lights and other aids to assist detection, immersion suits and thermal protective aids, applied to existing ships
not later than 1 July 1991.
The amendments were designed not only to take into account new developments but also to provide for
the evaluation and introduction of novel life-saving appliances or arrangements.
Like the original chapter, the new chapter contained three parts, but the arrangement is very different.
Part A deals with general matters such as application, exemptions, definitions, evaluation and testing and
production tests. Part B is concerned with ship requirements and contains three sections: Section I
(regulations 6 to 19) deals with passenger ships and cargo ships; Section II (regulations 20 to 25) contains
additional requirements for passenger ships and Section III (regulations 26 to 29) include additional
requirements for cargo ships.
Part C deals with life-saving appliance requirements. It contains 24 regulations divided into eight
sections.
Among the more important changes introduced by the revised Chapter III are those involving lifeboats
and liferafts.
Generally speaking, the lifeboats required by the original Chapter III of SOLAS 1974 are of the traditional
open design, most of them without power. The revised chapter required that all partially or totally enclosed
lifeboats be equipped with an engine (regulation 41). All totally enclosed boats must be self-righting. Cargo
ships must carry sufficient totally enclosed lifeboats on each side to accommodate all on board. Cargo ships
must also carry liferafts for launching on each side which will accommodate all on board. Chemical and oil
tankers must carry totally enclosed lifeboats equipped with a self-contained air support system (if the cargo
emits toxic gases). In addition these lifeboats must afford protection against fire for at least eight minutes
(where the cargo is flammable).
Rescue boats - that is, boats which are designed to rescue persons in distress and to marshal survival
craft are also required.
On passenger ships partially or totally enclosed lifeboats are required on each side able to accommodate
not less than 50 per cent of all persons on board. However, passenger ships on short international voyages
(ferries) are permitted to substitute liferafts for some of the lifeboats.
The requirements for inflatable and rigid liferafts were also rewritten and expanded. The new chapter
incorporated several regulations which were designed to ensure that all life-saving appliances were kept in
good condition and could be used promptly in the event of an emergency.
Chapter III required (regulation 13) that survival craft be capable of being launched when the ship has a
list of 20 degrees in either direction: the original Chapter III of SOLAS 1974 only required launching with a 15
degree list.
The revised Chapter III also included (regulation 28) a requirement that lifeboats on cargo ships of
20,000 gross tons and above be capable of being launched when the ship is making headway at speeds of up
to 5 knots. This was a new requirement in response to the fact that ships had increased greatly in size since
the original chapter had been drafted and tookmuch longer to stop.
The greatest danger in an accident at sea is not drowning but hypothermia, and the new chapter included
a number of regulations designed to reduce this threat. These included requirements for improved personal
life-saving appliances, including immersion suits (protective suits which reduce the body heat-loss of a person
8
in cold water) and thermal protective aids (a bag or suit made of waterproof material with low thermal
conductivity).
The revised Chapter III also made it easier for survivors to be located. Lifejackets had to be fitted with
lights and a whistle and provision was made for the use of retro-reflective materials.
The amendments to Chapter VII (Carriage of dangerous goods) of the Convention were of great
importance since they extended its application to chemical tankers and liquefied gas carriers. The original
chapter applied only to dangerous goods carried in packaged form.
The revised chapter achieved this by making reference to two new codes which have been developed by
IMO. These are the International Bulk Chemical (IBC) Code and the International Gas Carrier (IGC)
Code .
Regulation 10 of the new chapter states that "a chemical tanker shall comply with the requirements of the
International Bulk Chemical Code and shall ... be surveyed and certified as provided for in that Code. For the
purpose of this regulation the requirements of the Code should be treated as mandatory".
Regulation 13 makes a similar reference to gas carriers and the International Gas Carrier Code.
Both Codes relate to ships built on or after 1 July 1986 and were finalized and adopted by the MSC during
the session in which the amendments were adopted.
9
In October 1988 the MSC met again in a special session requested and paid for by the United Kingdom to
consider a second package of amendments arising from the Herald of Free Enterprise tragedy. The
amendments adopted entered into force on 29 April 1990.
One of the most important amendments concerns regulation 8 of Chapter II-1 and was designed to
improve the stability of passenger ships in the damaged condition. Work on the amendment began before the
Herald of Free Enterprise sinking but adoption was brought forward because of its relevance to ro-ro safety.
The amendment applied to ships built on or after 29 April 1990.
The amendment considerably expands the existing regulation by introducing a value of 15 degrees for a
minimum range of positive residual lever curve and a value of 0.015 m-rad for the area under the righting
lever curve in the final condition after damage. For the purpose of calculating heeling moments it takes into
account such factors as the crowding of passengers on to one side of the ship, the launching of survival craft
on one side of the ship and wind pressure. The amendment also stipulates that the maximum angle of heel
after flooding but before equalization shall not exceed 15 degrees.
A further amendment to regulation 8 was proposed by the United Kingdom. It is concerned with intact
rather than damage stability. It requires masters to be supplied with data necessary to maintain sufficient
intact stability and the amendment expands the regulation by requiring that the information must show the
influence of various trims, taking into account operational limits.
Ships must also have scales of draughts marked clearly at the bow and stern. Where these are not easily
readable the ship must also be fitted with a reliable draught indicating system. After loading and before
departure the master must determine the ship's trim and stability.
The next amendment adds a new regulation 20-1 which requires that cargo loading doors shall be locked
before the ship proceeds on any voyage and remain closed until the ship is at its next berth.
The third amendment affects regulation 22 and states that at periods not exceeding five years a
lightweight survey must be carried out to passenger ships to verify any changes in lightweight displacement
and the longitudinal centre of gravity. The lightweight of a ship consists of the hull, machinery crew and
fittings without fuel and stores. Additions to the structure can add significantly to lightweight and affect the
ship's stability.
10
cargo ships and 12 months for the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate. Annual inspections have been made
mandatory for cargo ships and unscheduled inspections have been discontinued. Other changes have been
made to survey intervals and requirements.
11
complete rewriting of Chapter VI, which previously only covered the carriage of grain. The amendments
extended the chapter to cover other cargoes, including bulk cargoes.
Other amendments affect Chapter II-2, which deals with fire safety, Chapter III (life-saving appliances),
Chapter V (safety of navigation) and Chapter VII (carriage of dangerous goods).
The new Chapter VI was retitled Carriage of Cargoes. It applies to all cargoes except liquids in bulk and
gases in bulk, both of whic h were covered by other IMO instruments. The chapter contains three sections.
Part A contains general provisions. Regulation 2 requires shippers to provide masters with appropriate
information concerning the cargo. Regulation 3 covers oxygen analysis and detection equipment and
regulation 4 deals with the use of pesticides: reference is made to the IMO Recommendation on the safe use of
pesticides in ships. Regulation 5 deals with stowage and securing and is particularly concerned with cargo
units and containers.
Part B of Chapter VI deals with bulk cargoes other than grain. It contains only two regulations, the first
of which (Regulation 6) deals with the acceptability of cargoes for shipment. Two IMO recommendations,
on intact stability and on severe wind and rolling criterion, are referred to. Regulation 7 deals with the stowage
of bulk cargoes.
Part C also only contains two regulations and its chief purpose is to define the coverage of the
International Grain Code.
The provisions of Chapter VI are backed by a number of Codes.
Only the International Grain Code was mandatory in its entirety. The other Codes were all
recommended. They are the Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and Securing (parts of which have
been mandatory since 1 July 1996), the Code of Safe Practice for Solid Bulk Cargoes (BC Code) and the Code
of Safe Practice for Ships Carrying Timber Deck Cargoes. Regulation 1 of the revised Chapter says that
Contracting Governments to SOLAS must ensure that "appropriate information on cargo and its stowage and
securing is provided". By means of an asterisk, reference is then made to the Codes.
Code of Safe Practice for Ships Carrying Timber Deck Cargoes, 1991
The Code replaces a version first circulated in 1972. It was necessary to revise this because of the continuing
occurrence of casualties involving shift and the loss of timber deck cargoes, the employment of larger and
more sophisticated ships, new techniques and the desirability of having more comprehensive
recommendations.
It covers such matters as stability, stowage, personnel protection and safety devices and action to be
taken during the voyage. One appendix gives advice on stowing practices and another contains general
guidelines on the under-deck stowage of logs.
12
exists a void space between the surface of the grain and the deckhead. The Rules require demonstration by
calculation that at all times during a voyage the ship will have sufficient intact stability to provide adequate
residual dynamic stability after taking into account the adverse heeling effects caused by an assumed pattern
of grain movement.
Temporary fittings to reduce grain shift, such as shifting boards, depend entirely upon achieving the
correct relationship between the intact stability characteristics of the ship and the heeling effects of a possible
grain shift within the various compartments.
The Rules require a minimum level of acceptable stability for the carriage of grain in terms of angle of
heel due to assumed grain shift, residual righting energy and initial metacentric height.
In the new Chapter VI, the carriage of grain is dealt with in two general regulations and detailed grain
rules have been transferred to the mandatory Code.
Chapter II-2: Construction - fire protection, fire detection and fire extinction
Two of the amendments apply to all ships. They affect regulations 20 and 21, which deal respectively with
fire control plans and ready availability of fire-extinguishing appliances. The remaining amendments concern
passenger ships built on or after 1 January 1994 and are particularly concerned with fire safety on ships, such
as modern cruise liners, on which large open spaces such as atriums are commonly provided.
Atriums are defined as public spaces which span three or more decks and contain combustibles such as
furniture and enclosed spaces, such as shops, offices and restaurants. Regulation 28 has been revised to
make it mandatory for such spaces to be provided with two means of escape, one of which gives direct
access to an enclosed vertical means of escape.
Regulation 32 requires that such spaces be fitted with a smoke extraction system, which can be activated
manually as well as by a smoke detection system, which is required under the amended regulation 40.
Regulation 36 has been amended to make it mandatory for such spaces to be fitted with automatic sprinkler
systems.
13
The April 1992 Amendments
Measures to improve the damage stability of passenger ships came into force on 29 April 1990 and the April
1992 amendments to regulation 8 of Chapter II-1 mean that a slightly modified "SOLAS 90" standard will be
phased in for ro-ro passenger ships built before that date during an 11-year period beginning on 1 October
1994. The phase-in period allowed depends upon the value of a ratio A/Amax, determined in accordance with
a calculation procedure developed by the Maritime Safety Committee to assess the survivability characteristics
of existing ro-ro passenger ships.
Those with an A/Amax value of less than 70% for example, had to comply with the amendments by 1
October 1994, the date on which the amendments entered into force. The complete phase-in period and
degree of compliance is shown below:
Compliance
The application of the modified SOLAS 90 standard to existing ships means that a large part of the
world's ro-ro fleet will have to be altered. In some cases the changes could be extensive and the high cost
involved could lead to some of them being scrapped and replaced with new tonnage.
The improved fire safety measures for existing passenger ships which are introduced through
amendments to Chapter II-2 include mandatory requirements for smoke detection and alarm and sprinkler
systems in accommodation and service spaces, stairway enclosures and corridors. Other improvements
involve the provision of emergency lighting, general emergency alarm systems and other means of
communication. The new measures are being phased in between 1994 and 2000.
The amendments are particularly important because they apply to existing ships. In the past, major
changes to SOLAS have been restricted to new ships by so-called "grandfather clauses". The reason for this
is that major changes involve expensive modifications to most ships. Because of the financial burden this
imposes on the industry, IMO has in the past been reluctant to make such measures retroactive.
On this occasion the MSC decided that the new stability and fire safety standards are so important that
they should not be restricted to new ships. The Herald of Free Enterprise disaster of 1987 and the
Scandinavian Star fire of 1988 respectively both influenced the Committee in making this decision.
14
detection and fire-alarm systems.
A new regulation 20-4 was added, making it mandatory for ships carrying more than 36 passengers to
have plans providing information on fire safety measures. These are based on guidelines developed by IMO
and contained in Assembly resolution A.756(18). Regulations dealing with the fire integrity of bulkheads and
decks were amended. Regulation 28 (means of escape) was considerably altered: corridors from which there
is only one route of escape are prohibited on ships built after 1 October 1994. All means of escape must be
marked by lighting or photoluminescent strip indicators placed not more than 0.3 m above the deck. The
lighting must identify escape routes and escape exits.
Requirements for fire doors (regulation 30) were also improved.
Passenger ships carrying more than 36 passengers will have to be equipped with an automatic sprinkler,
fire-detection and fire-alarm system.
The amendments made it mandatory for new passenger ships carrying more than 36 passengers to be
fitted with fire-detection alarms centralized in a control station which must be continuously manned and from
which it is possible to control the fire-detection system, fire doors, watertight doors, ventilation fans, alarms,
communications system and the microphone to the public address system.
Two codes which are mandatory under SOLAS and MARPOL were also amended. They are the
International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (IGC Code)
and the International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in
Bulk (IBC Code), both of which apply to ships built after 1986 under the SOLAS Convention. The
amendments entered into force on 1 July 1994.
Other changes were made to the Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk (BCH Code). This applies to ships built before 1986. The amendments also entered into
force on 1 July 1994.
The most important changes to the IBC Code are to Chapter 8 (cargo-tank venting and gas-freeing
arrangements), Chapter 17 (summary of minimum requirements) and Chapter 18 (list of chemicals to which
the Code does not apply). In each case the existing text is completely replaced.
Many of the amendments made to the BCH Code are intended to keep it in line with the IBC Code. They
include a new text of Chapter VI (summary of minimum requirements) and a new Chapter VIII dealing with
the transport of liquid chemical wastes.
Although some of the changes to the IGC Code are of an editorial nature, others are intended to ensure
that it keeps pace with technical changes that have been made since it was adopted in 1983.
15
• a safety and environmental protection policy;
instructions and procedures to ensure safety and environmental protection;
• defined levels of authority and lines of communication between and amongst shore and shipboard
personnel;
• procedures for reporting accidents, etc.;
• procedures for responding to emergencies;
• procedures for internal audits and management review.
The Company is then required to establish and implement a policy for achieving these objectives. This
includes providing the necessary resources and shore-based support. Every company is expected "to
designate a person or persons ashore having direct access to the highest level of management".
The Code then goes on to outline the responsibility and authority of the master of the ship. It states that
the SMS should make it clear that "the master has the overriding authority and the responsibility to make
decisions ..." The Code then deals with other seagoing personnel and emphasizes the importance of training.
Companies are required to prepare plans and instructions for key shipboard operations and to make
preparations for dealing with any emergencies which might arise. The importance of maintenance is stressed
and companies are required to ensure that regular inspections are held and corrective measures taken where
necessary.
The procedures required by the Code should be documented and compiled in a Safety Management
Manual, a copy of which should be kept on board. Regular checks and audits should be held by the company
to ensure that the SMS is being complied with and the system itself should be reviewed periodically to
evaluate its efficiency.
After outlining the responsibilities of the company, the Code then stresses that the responsibility for
ensuring that the Code is complied with rests with the Government. Companies which comply with the Code
should be issued with a document of compliance, a copy of which should be kept on board. Administrations
should also issue a Safety Management Certificate to indicate that the company operates in accordance with
the SMS and periodic checks should be carried out to verify that the ship's SMS is functioning properly.
The Chapter enters into force under the tacit acceptance procedure on 1 July 1998. It will apply to
passenger ships, oil and chemical tankers, bulk carriers, gas carriers and cargo high speed craft of 500 gross
tonnage and above not later than that date and to other cargo ships and mobile offshore drilling units of 500
gross tonnage and above not later than 1 July 2002.
Chapter X: Safety of High- Speed Craft: many new types of high-speed craft (HSC) are now being
constructed and the new chapter is intended to provide mandatory international regulations dealing with the
special needs of this type of vessel.
The HSC Code applies to high-speed craft engaged on international voyages and includes passenger craft
which do not proceed for more than four hours at operational speed from a place of refuge when fully laden
and cargo craft of 500 gross tonnage and above which do not go more than eight hours from a port of
refuge.
The craft covered by the draft Code include, among others, air-cushion vehicles (such as hovercraft) and
hydrofoil boats. The Code is intended to be a complete set of comprehensive requirements for high-speed
craft, including equipment and conditions for operation and maintenance. A basic aim is to provide levels of
safety which are equivalent to those contained in SOLAS and the International Convention on Load Lines,
1966.
The Chapter entered into force on 1 January 1996.
Chapter XI: Special Measures to Enhance Maritime Safety. The chapter entered into force on 1
January 1996 and contains four regulations.
Regulation 1 states that organizations entrusted by Administrations with the responsibility for carrying
out surveys and inspections shall comply with the guidelines adopted by the IMO Assembly by resolution
A.739 (18) in November 1993.
Such organizations are often used to carry out surveys and inspections required by SOLAS, the 1966
Load Lines Convention, MARPOL 73/78 and the 1969 Tonnage Convention. The guidelines are intended to
16
ensure that organizations employed in this comply with standards listed in an appendix to the guidelines.
Regulation 2 requires that bulk carriers and oil tankers shall be subject to the enhanced programme of
inspection in accordance with the guidelines adopted in 1993 by Assembly resolution A.744(18).
The enhanced surveys should be carried out during the periodical, intermediate and annual surveys
prescribed by the SOLAS Convention.
The guidelines on the enhanced programme of inspections were developed by IMO as a result of a high
number of casualties in recent years and of increasing concern about the ageing of the world merchant
shipping fleet. This is particularly true of tankers and bulk carriers, the majority of which are now between
15 and 20 years of age. An accident to a tanker can have disastrous environmental consequences while an
accident to a bulk cargo carrier can result in the ship suddenly sinking or breaking apart: in the early 1990s
there were many cases of bulk carriers sinking so suddenly that there was no time for a distress message to
be sent out or the crew to be safely evacuated.
The guidelines pay special attention to corrosion. Coatings and tank corrosion prevention systems must
be thoroughly checked and measurements must also be carried out to check the thickness of plates. These
measurements become more extensive as the ship ages. The guidelines go into considerable detail to explain
the extra checks that should be carried out during enhanced surveys. One section deals with preparations for
surveys and another with the documentation which should be kept on board each ship and be readily available
to surveyors. This should record full reports of all surveys carried out on the ship.
Annexes to the guidelines go into still more detail and are intended to assist implementation. They specify
the structural members that should be examined, for example, in areas of extensive corrosion; outline
procedures for certification of companies engaged in thickness measurement of hull structures; recommend
procedures for thickness measurements and close-up surveys; and give guidance on preparing the
documentation required.
Regulation 3 provides that all passenger ships of 100 gross tonnage and above and all cargo ships of 300
gross tonnage and above shall be provided with an identification number conforming to the IMO ship
identification number scheme, as adopted by resolution A.600(15) in 1987.
Regulation 4 makes it possible for port State control officers inspecting foreign ships to check
operational requirements "when there are clear grounds for believing that the master or crew are not familiar
with essential shipboard procedures relating to the safety of ships".
Reference is made to the procedures contained in the annex to resolution A.742(18), which was adopted
by the IMO Assembly in November 1993. The resolution refers to a number of earlier resolutions dealing with
control procedures, management responsibilities and principles of safe manning but notes that none of these
explicitly deals with the influence of the human element on maritime safety or pollution prevention.
It acknowledges the need for port States to be able to monitor not only the way in which foreign ships
comply with IMO standards but also to be able to assess "the ability of ships' crews in respect of operational
requirements relevant to their duties, especially with regard to passenger ships and ships which may present a
special hazard".
The resolution agrees that, where there are clear grounds for believing that a ship's officers and crew are
not familiar with essential shipboard procedures, then port State control should be extended to include
operational requirements.
The "clear grounds" referred to are defined in the annex to the resolution. They include such factors as
operational shortcomings, cargo operations not being conducted properly, the involvement of the ship in
incidents caused by operational mistakes, absence of an up-to-date muster list and indications that crew
members may not be able to communicate with each other.
The procedures refer to control procedures in three IMO Conventions. They are regulation 19 of
Chapter I of SOLAS; articles 5 and 6 of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from
Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78) and article X of the
International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW),
1978.
The procedures say that accidents involving passenger ships and ships carrying harmful substances have
highlighted the need for good operational standards. These are primarily the responsibility of flag States but,
the introduction to the procedures, observes: "It may be difficult for some Administrations to exercise full and
17
continuous control of ships entitled to fly their flag under certain circumstances, such as the cargo the ship
carries and the familiarity of the crew with the ship, which can change completely between two successive
flag State inspections and the fact that some ships do not regularly call at flag States' national ports."
Port State control inspections are normally limited to checking certificates and documents. The
introduction says that if certificates are not valid or if there are clear grounds for believing that the condition
of the ship or of its equipment, or its crew, does not substantially meet the requirements of a relevant
instrument, a more detailed inspection may be carried out.
The annex then goes on to give guidelines on how to carry out control of operational requirements under
the three conventions. It is not intended that all operational procedures would be checked during one single
inspection.
The operations and procedures selected for special attention include ascertaining that crew members are
aware of their duties as indicated in the muster list; communications; fire and abandon ship drills; familiarity
with the ship's damage control and fire control plans; bridge, cargo and machinery operations; and ability to
understand manuals and other instructions. The guidelines then cover operational requirements relating to
anti-pollution activities.
Detailed guidance on how these factors should be assessed is given in an appendix.
The new Chapter XI was adopted after considerable discussion and a resolution adopted by the
conference states that it is "undesirable, due to its special nature, that the provisions of the chapter be
frequently amended".
18
19
The December 1994 amendments
The amendments, which entered into force on 1 July 1996, affect a number of regulations in Chapters VI and
VII and make mandatory parts of the Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and Securing.
20
and maintained in compliance with structural, mechanical and electrical requirements of a recognized
classification society or with applicable national requirements by the Administration. A new regulation 3-2
deals with corrosion prevention of seawater ballast tanks and other amendments to chapter II-1 concern the
stability of passenger and cargo ships in the damaged condition.
Chapter VI (Carriage of cargoes) was also amended. Regulation 7 has been replaced by a new text
dealing with the loading, unloading and stowage of bulk cargoes. It is intended to ensure that no excessive
stress is placed on the ship's structure during such operations. The ship must be provided with a booklet
giving advice on cargo handling operations and the master and terminal representative must agree on a plan to
ensure that loading and unloading is carried out safely.
A change was also made to Chapter XI dealing with the authorization of recognized organizations. The
International Bulk Chemicals (IBC) and Bulk Chemicals (BCH) Code were also amended. The IBC Code is
mandatory under SOLAS and applies to ships carrying dangerous chemicals in bulk that were built after 1 July
1986. The BCH is recommended and applies to ships built before that date.
21
flooding of any one cargo hold, taking into account dynamic effects resulting from presence of water in the
hold and taking into account the recommendations adopted by IMO.
For existing ships (built before 1 July 1999) carrying bulk cargoes with a density of 1,780 kg/m3 and
above, the transverse watertight bulkhead between the two foremost cargo holds and the double bottom of the
foremost cargo hold should have sufficient strength to withstand flooding and the related dynamic effects in
the foremost cargo hold.
Cargoes with a density of 1,780 kg/m3 and above (heavy cargoes) include iron ore, pig iron, steel,
bauxite and cement. Lighter cargoes, but with a density of more than 1,000 kg/m3 , include grains such as
wheat and rice, and timber.
The amendments take into account a study into bulk carrier survivability carried out by the International
Association of Classification Societies (IACS) at the request of IMO. IACS found that if a ship is flooded in
the forward hold, the bulkhead between the two foremost holds may not be able to withstand the pressure
that results from the sloshing mixture of cargo and water, especially if the ship is loaded in alternate holds
with high density cargoes (such as iron ore). If the bulkhead between one hold and the next collapses,
progressive flooding could rapidly occur throughout the length of the ship and the vessel would sink in a
matter of minutes.
IACS concluded that the most vulnerable areas are the bulkhead between numbers one and two holds at
the forward end of the vessel and the double bottom of the ship at this location. It proposed that during
special surveys of ships, particular attention should be paid to these areas and, where necessary,
reinforcements should be carried out.
The criteria and formulae used to assess whether a ship currently meets the new requirements, for
example in terms of the thickness of the steel used for bulkhead structures, or whether reinforcement is
necessary, are laid out in IMO standards adopted by the 1997 Conference.
Under the new Chapter XII, surveyors can take into account restrictions on the cargo carried in
considering the need for, and the extent of, strengthening of the transverse watertight bulkhead or double
bottom. When restrictions on cargoes are imposed, the bulk carrier should be permanently marked with a
solid triangle on its side shell.
The date of application of the new Chapter to existing bulk carriers depends on their age. Bulk carriers
which are 20 years old and over on 1 July 1999 will have to comply by the date of the first intermediate or
periodic survey after that date, whichever is sooner. Bulk carriers aged 15-20 years must comply by the first
periodical survey after 1 July 1999, but not later than 1 July 2002. Bulk carriers less than 15 years old must
comply by the date of the first periodical survey after the ship reaches 15 years of age, but not later than the
date on which the ship reaches 17 years of age.
22
makes it clear that "all cargoes, other than solid and liquid bulk cargoes" should be loaded, stowed and secured
in accordance with the Cargo Securing Manual. A similar amendment was adopted for Regulation 6 of
Chapter VII Carriage of Dangerous Goods, also covering Stowage and securing.
23
How SOLAS has changed: the shading indicates which chapters were amended
1974
1978
Protocol
1981
1982
1983
1985
1986
1987
1988 Apr
1988 Oct
1988 Nov
Protocol
1988 Nov
GMDSS
1989
1990
1991
1992 Apr
1992 Dec
1993
1994 May
1994 Dec
1995
1996 June
1996 Dec
1997 Nov
1998 May
24
25