SELECT YOUR COUNTRY MYLINCOLN
PRODUCTS WHERE TO BUY EDUCATION SAFETY SUPPORT CONTACT
Home > Support > Process and Theory
FCAW-G Electrode Usability Designators
Resource Center
Application Stories
CAD File Downloads Flux-Cored Electrodes’ Usability Designators: What Do They Mean?
Multi-Process Resources
Q: I am a new salesperson for a welding supply company. I have noticed that the AWS classification number for many of the flux-cored wires we carry are the
Plasma Cutting same on the front end, but then have different dash numbers on the back end. Some example numbers are E71T-1, E71T-8, E71T-9, E71T-11, etc. Some wires
Resources even have two or three numbers on them. I have heard these “dash numbers” called performance capabilities numbers. But what exactly do they mean? Also,
how can some wires have more than one AWS number?
Power Wave Resources
A: The dash numbers you are asking about are called “Usability Designators” and refer to the usability of the electrode with requirements for polarity and
Process and Theory general operating characteristics. Before discussing the specifics of each designator, a quick review of the meaning of an electrode’s entire American Welding
Society (AWS) classification number is in order. Figure 1 shows the key to an electrode’s AWS classification number. Each letter and digit in the number
Weld Fume Resources indicates something about the electrode. Complete details about these electrode classification numbers and more are contained in the AWS document
A5.20/A5.20M:2005, titled “Specification for Carbon Steel Electrodes for Flux Cored Arc Welding”.
Welding How-To's
Welding Projects
Welding Solutions
YouTube
Figure 1: Key to AWS Classification Designators for Carbon Steel Flux-Cored Electrodes
As stated earlier, the usability designators for flux-cored electrodes specify the requirements for polarity and general operating characteristics. These designators
may be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, G or GS. Each usability designation indicates a general grouping of electrodes that contain similar usability
characteristics. The exceptions are the “G” and “GS” classifications, where usability characteristics may differ between similarly classified electrodes.
The “G” stands for “general” classification. “GS” stands for general, “single” pass only applications. In both cases, it is general because not all of the particular
requirements specified for the other designation classifications are specified for this classification. The intent for the general designation is to allow newly
developed flux-cored electrodes that may differ in one way or another to all the other usability designations a way to still be classified according to the filler metal
specification. This allows an electrode to be used right away, without having to wait potentially years for the filler metal specification to be revised to create a new
usability designation.
The usability designator also indicates a particular flux-cored electrode’s type of shielding system. AWS classifies all flux-cored electrodes into one group for the
Flux-Cored Arc Welding (FCAW) process. However, there are two fundamentally different categories or sub-sets of electrodes in this group. These include self-
shielded, flux-cored electrodes (FCAW-S process) and gas-shielded, flux-cored electrodes (FCAW-G process). They are all tubular electrodes with fluxing
elements inside the electrode which, among other things, produce a slag covering of the weld. However, self-shielded electrodes completely produce their own
shielding system (like Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) or stick electrodes), while gas-shielded electrodes also utilize an external shielding gas system (i.e.,
they are double shielded).
These usability designators can be sub-divided into the two main categories of electrodes as follows:
Self-Shielded, Flux-Cored Electrodes: T-3, -4, -6, -7, -8, -10, -11, -13, -14, -G, -GS
Gas-Shielded, Flux-Cored Electrodes: T-1, -2, -5, -9, -12, -G, - GS
Detailed information on each of these usability designation classifications are found in the AWS A5:20/A5.20M:2005* carbon steel flux cored filler metal
specification. Various tables in the specification include requirements for each usability designation. Table 1 lists the required mechanical properties. Table 2 lists
the “Electrode Usability Requirements”, including position of welding, use or none use of an external shielding gas, polarity and application (single or multi-
pass). Table 3 lists the tests required for classification. Table 6 lists the weld metal chemical composition requirements. In addition, Annex A, Section A7
contains a detailed description and intended use for each usability designator.
A summary of the main points of each usability designation group are included in this article in Figures 2 and 3.
* The dual numbering system for filler metal specifications (e.g. A5:20/A5:20M) means that they include both English units and metric units. The year of
publication is also included at the end of the document number.
Figure 2: Description of Usability Designations for Self-Shielded, Flux-Cored Electrodes
Figure 3: Description of Usability Designations for Gas-Shielded, Flux-Cored Electrodes
Addressing the second question for this column, some electrodes do indeed carry two or more different AWS classification numbers. This is quite common with
electrodes that are dual classified as a “T-1” and “T-9” electrode. Referring back to figure 3, note that these two usability designations have the exact same
electrode and operating characteristics. The only difference is with the impact properties. A “9” electrode has a more stringent impact toughness requirement of
20 ft•lbf @ -20⁰ F (27 J @ -29⁰ C) versus a “1” electrode of 20 ft•lbf @ 0⁰ F (27 J @ -18⁰ C). Therefore, if a specific electrode can meet the minimum impact
toughness requirement at the colder -20⁰ F (-29⁰ C) temperature, then it can also more easily meet it at the warmer 0⁰ F (-18⁰ C) temperature. Thus one
electrode can meet the requirements of two different usability classifications.
In other cases, electrodes may be tri-classified as a “T-1”, “T-9” and “T-12” electrode. A “12” designation classification also has the exact same electrode and
operating characteristics as a “1” and “9” classification. A “12” classification has a slightly lower maximum manganese (Mn) level and slightly lower maximum
tensile strength cap than “1” and “9” classifications. Therefore, “12” electrodes also meet the requirements of “1” and “9” electrodes. While “12” electrodes were
traditionally classified by themselves, manufacturers have more recently begun to tri-classify them.
Note that flux cored electrodes can also have an optional "J" designator. This means that the electrode can meet an even more stringent impact toughness
requirement of 20 ft•lbf @ -40⁰ F (27 J @ -40⁰ C). Most “12” electrodes have the optional J designation. However, a “12” electrode does not technically have to
meet Charpy V-notch (CVN) values of 20 ft•lbf @ -40⁰ F (27 J @ -40⁰ C), it is just that most do. Note also that while most “1” / “9” electrodes do not have an
optional J designator, they technically could have it if they met the impact requirement. And in fact, some do carry the optional J designator, such as Lincoln
Electric’s Outershield® 71M electrode.
This column has focused on carbon steel electrodes. However, there are also low alloy flux-cored electrodes available in the welding market. These electrodes
are classified in the AWS document A5.29:A5.29M:2010 “Specification for Low Alloy Electrodes for Flux Cored Arc Welding”. These electrodes produce welds
that are typically stronger than welds made with carbon steel electrodes, and have minimum tensile strengths of 80 to 120 ksi (550 – 827 MPa).
Their electrode classification numbers are similar to carbon steel electrodes, including similar (but less) usability designation classifications. The mechanical
properties and weld metal chemical composition requirements of each usability classification can vary with different alloy types and alloy levels in each electrode.
Again the detailed requirements of each usability classification are contained in various tables in the A5.29:A5.29M filler metal specification.
These usability designators for low alloy flux cored electrodes can by sub-divided into the two main categories of electrodes as follows:
• Self-Shielded, Flux-Cored Electrodes: T4, 6, 7, 8, G
• Gas-Shielded, Flux-Cored Electrodes: T1, 5, G
One slight difference with low alloy electrodes’ classification numbering system is that the usability designator, following the “T” designator, now precedes the
dash, with the deposition composition or alloy designator now following the dash. For example, a carbon steel electrode might have the classification number
“E71T-1M-JH8”, while a low alloy electrode might have the classification number “E81T1-K2M-JH4”.
As a final point, note that there is a new filler metal specification, AWS A5.36/A5.36M:2012, “Specification for Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel Flux Cored Electrodes
for Flux Cored Arc Welding and Metal Cored Electrodes for Gas Metal Arc Welding". It covers both carbon steel and low alloy flux-cored electrodes, as well as
carbon steel and low alloy metal cored electrodes. It is the first of a new and improved style of filler metal specifications. It is effective now and runs in
conjunction with AWS A5.20 and A5.29 until 2015. At that point the old specifications will be obsolete and the new A5.36 specification will be the only one in
effect. While the usability designations are similar to those in A5.20 and A5.29, it does include a few slight changes and some additional ones involving metal
cored wires. However, discussion of this new A5.36 specification is for a future column.
Products Education Support Corporate
Welding Equipment Education Center - home Support - home Investor Relations
Cutting Equipment Education Purchasing Portal Contact Us Sustainability
Gear & Tools U/Linc Curriculum Operators Manuals Careers
Accessories Welding Safety Training Videos Product Registration Company History
Welding Wire, Flux & Rods Attend our Welding School Warranty Information Logo Merchandise Store
Guns & Torches Seminars & Workshops Certificate Center James F Lincoln Foundation (JFLF)
Automated Welding & Cutting Systems Equipment Certificate Center Industry Certifications
Training Equipment for Educators Parts Directory Legal
Stay Connected
Weld Fume Control Literature Request Suppliers
Orbital Welding Systems Frequently Asked Questions Subsidiaries & Affiliates
Newsletters - browse all
Automation Systems Solutions Overview Conflict Minerals Visitor Information
Facebook
Large Format Additive Manufacturing Customer Assistance Policy Media Newsroom
Twitter
California Supply Chains Act
YouTube
Modern Slavery Act Disclosure
Instagram
Safety Industries We Serve
LinkedIn
Welding Safety Training Information Heavy Fabrication
Business Partners
Welding Fume Control Products Automotive/Transportation
Helmets & Apparel Pipeline MyLincoln Login/Register
Safety Data Sheets (SDS) Maintenance & Repair Alloy Surcharge
Offshore
Browse all Industry Solutions
© 1999-2020 The Lincoln Electric Company