Curriculum Development
NAME: George M. Bendanillo
SECTION: Bocobo
DATE: MAY 23, 2020
According to Kurt Levin’s Force Field Theory and Curriculum Change, there is a driving force and
restraining force that is being viewed. As per him, for a change to occur driving force must overpower
the restraining force. Below are the driving factors vs. restraining in K to 12 programs:
Defining the Problem
Defining the Change Objective
Identifying the Driving Forces
Identifying the Restraining Forces
Developing the Comprehensive Change Strategy
should also include some consideration of some of the possible unintended
Government intervention vs. Fear of unknown
Before its implementation, government do some meetings and seminar to the different
educational sectors for this program and they’ve done meetings with the parents on the flow it. that
the child could get a work after taking this program.
Society’s Values vs. Negative attitude to change
Example one of this program is it’s on-the job training aspect, some society specifically on
outside town areas where no establishment to be engage for this, and it take a hundred miles just to
be on the nearest establishment will be a problem.
Technological changes vs. Tradition values
K to 12 program main goal is to enhance and developed students to be able to out stand the
ever-changing environment and foe them to be globally acceptable. Including on powering up
technology as its one of the teaching tools that will be used in teaching learning process, it’s great
really.
Knowledge explosion vs. Limited resources
With the limited time offer on its readiness, there is a limited resource of facilities,
textbooks, areas equipment that is being rendered to schools. But the government from time to
time makes a way for these schools to be competent in K to 12 programs.
Administrative result vs. Obsolete Equipment
With the limited equipment or technology offered in school, teachers tendency used those
traditional way in teaching.