Scribd
Upload
450 views1 page

Legal Consequences of False Certificates

1) Article 174 establishes penalties for physicians who issue false medical certificates and public officers who issue false certificates of merit or service. It also establishes penalties for private individuals who falsify such certificates. 2) The case involved Rufino Deloso, who falsified a certificate stating he had resided in a town for 6 months in order to run for municipal president. He was found guilty of falsifying an official document under Articles 310 and 311 of the Penal Code. 3) The court held that while the certificate was not strictly a public document, falsifying it was still punished under Articles 306-311. Deloso knew the certificate was false as evidence showed he resided elsewhere, and he was found guilty

Uploaded by

dnzrck
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
450 views1 page

Legal Consequences of False Certificates

1) Article 174 establishes penalties for physicians who issue false medical certificates and public officers who issue false certificates of merit or service. It also establishes penalties for private individuals who falsify such certificates. 2) The case involved Rufino Deloso, who falsified a certificate stating he had resided in a town for 6 months in order to run for municipal president. He was found guilty of falsifying an official document under Articles 310 and 311 of the Penal Code. 3) The court held that while the certificate was not strictly a public document, falsifying it was still punished under Articles 306-311. Deloso knew the certificate was false as evidence showed he resided elsewhere, and he was found guilty

Uploaded by

dnzrck
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Art. 174: False medical certificates, false certificates of merit or service, etc.

– The penalties of arresto mayor in


its maximum period to prision correccional in its minimum period and a fine not to exceed 1,000 pesos shall be
imposed upon:
1. Any physician or surgeon who, in connection with the practice of his profession, shall issue a false
certificate; and
2. Any public officer who shall issue a false certificate of merit or service, good conduct, or similar
circumstances.
The penalty of arresto mayor shall be imposed upon any private person who shall falsify a certificate falling
within the classes mentioned in the two preceding subdivisions.

US VS. DELOSO
GR No. 4411 Aug. 31, 1908

Facts: Rufino Deloso in order to take part in the municipal elections called at the building and stated under oath to
the municipal secretary that he was a resident of the said town, and at the date of the next municipal election, he
would have resided therein for a period of six months. That he was in every way entitled to vote. Rufino Deloso was
elected by a majority vote to the office of municipal president. The election was protested by several residents of
the town on the grounds that the successful candidate had no legal residence therein. Deloso stated under oath that
he had been, and was at the time, a resident of the said town, and that he had resided there in from the month of
April 1902 until the above-mentioned date.

A complaint was filed by the provincial fiscal charging Deloso with the crime of falsification of official documents,
and the court, in view of the evidence adduced at the trial, found him guilty of the crime defined and punished by
Art. 311, in connection with Art. 310, of the Penal Code.

Issue: WON Deloso was guilty of the crime of falsifying a certificate issued by a public officer was committed by a
private person who used it?

Held: Yes. The document offered is not strictly speaking a public document but it belongs to the class of documents
the falsification of which is specially punished by Arts. 306 – 311 of the Penal Code.

The said document or certificate was used with a knowledge that its contents were false, in that Deloso was not a
resident of Jimenez. The falsity of the statement, made by him to the municipal secretary of said pueblo, was proven
by another notarial document executed by the same Deloso who also stated under oath, that he was a resident of
Oroquieta both before and after the year 1904; it is therefore unquestionable that Deloso has incurred the penalty
imposed by Art. 311 of the Penal Code.

Deloso pleaded not guilty and alleged that he signed the document without having read it and that he was not
acquainted with the provisions of the Municipal Code as to the residence required of an elector. These allegations
cannot be sustained nor do they constitute an exemption to him.

You might also like