Mongolia 2018
Mongolia 2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from:
b. Disappearance
The law prohibits such practices. Nevertheless, the National Human Rights
Commission (NHRC) and other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) reported
the use of unnecessary force and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or
punishment of some prisoners and detainees, particularly to obtain confessions,
were problems.
MONGOLIA 2
Local police are responsible for investigating allegations of abuse and torture. The
Independent Authority Against Corruption (IAAC) investigates officials accused
of torture. According to the IAAC, as of September it received 43 complaints of
alleged torture. Of these, 24 cases were opened, 18 were dismissed, and one case
remained under investigation. The IAAC also received 54 complaints of the use of
force against the health or body of an individual by a public official, police officer,
or investigator. Of these, 30 cases were opened, 21 were dismissed, and two
remained under investigation as of September. The Ministry of Justice and Home
Affairs reported that prisoners and detainees submitted five complaints of abuse as
of September.
The NHRC, NGOs, and defense attorneys reported that, in an attempt to coerce or
intimidate detainees, authorities sometimes threatened detainees’ families,
transferred detainees repeatedly, or placed them in detention centers distant from
their homes and families, making access to legal counsel and visits by family
members difficult. Human rights NGOs reported obstacles to gathering evidence
of torture or abuse. For example, although many prisons and detention facilities
had cameras for monitoring prisoner interrogations, authorities often reported the
equipment was inoperable at the time of reported abuses.
Under the criminal code, which came into effect in July 2017, all public officials
are subject to prosecution for official abuse or torture. This code covers both
physical and psychological abuse; however, the maximum punishment for torture
is a prison sentence of five years. Although officials are liable for intentional
infliction of severe bodily injury, prosecutions of this crime were rare. The law
states prohibited acts do not constitute a crime when committed in accordance with
an order by a superior in the course of duty. The law provides that the person who
gave an illegal order is criminally liable for the harm caused, but prosecutions were
rare. According to the NHRC, prosecutors, and judges, the law effectively
provides immunity to officials allegedly engaged in coercing confessions at the
behest of investigators or prosecutors. The NHRC also indicated authorities
sometimes abandoned complaints of alleged psychological torture either for lack of
evidence or because the degree of injury could not be determined. Moreover,
witnesses were generally themselves detainees or prisoners and were under great
pressure not to testify, including by threats against family or of additional charges
with potentially longer sentences.
The 23 prisons and 26 pretrial detention centers the General Executive Agency of
Court Decisions (GEACD) administered were generally not overcrowded.
Nonetheless, NGOs and government officials reported that in the five older pretrial
detention centers in rural areas, insufficient medical care, clothing, bedding, food,
potable water, heating, lighting, ventilation, sanitary facilities, and
accommodations for persons with disabilities were often problems. Conditions in
some police-operated alcohol detoxification centers were poor.
The GEACD reported no deaths in prisons and one death in pretrial detention
facilities as of September. According to the GEACD, 39 prisoners contracted
tuberculosis as of September. According to the GEACD, it provided funding for a
new facility to treat prisoners with tuberculosis. Correctional officials routinely
released terminally ill patients shortly before death, which NGOs alleged led to
misleadingly low prisoner death statistics.
The law provides that no person shall be arrested, detained, or deprived of liberty
except by specified procedures and provides for the right of any person to
challenge the lawfulness of his or her arrest or detention in court, and government
agencies generally observed these prohibitions. The General Intelligence Agency
(GIA) sometimes detained suspects for questioning without charge, but the
criminal code requires that a prosecutor supervise all detention.
The National Police Agency (NPA) and the General Authority for Border
Protection, which operate under the Ministry of Justice and Home Affairs, are
primarily responsible for internal security. The GIA, whose director reports to the
prime minister, assists these two forces with internal security, in addition to foreign
intelligence collection and operations.
The armed forces report to the Ministry of Defense and are responsible for national
defense. The armed forces assist internal security forces in providing domestic
emergency assistance and disaster relief.
Civilian authorities maintained control over both internal and external security
forces, but mechanisms to investigate allegations of police abuses remained
inadequate. There were reports police sometimes abused suspects.
A detainee has the right to an attorney during pretrial detention and all subsequent
stages of the legal process, including after sentencing. If a defendant does not
engage an attorney, the government must appoint one if the defendant has a
physical or mental disability that would hinder self-defense, is a minor, is not
proficient in the Mongolian language, or has a conflict of interest with the defense
counsel or other defendants. The law does not provide for the indigent status of a
defendant. Detainees were generally aware of their right to legal counsel, but
misperceptions limited their use of this right. For example, detainees were
frequently unaware they could exercise this right from the start of the legal process
and frequently did not assert it unless and until their cases reached trial.
The constitution and law provide for an independent judiciary, but NGOs and
private businesses reported that judicial corruption and third-party influence
continued. Courts rarely entered not guilty verdicts or dismissed criminal charges
over the objection of prosecutors, even when full trials had produced no substantial
evidence of guilt. Courts often returned criminal cases to prosecutors when
acquittal appeared more appropriate. Consequently, some serious criminal cases
cycled for years between prosecutors and the courts without resolution.
Trial Procedures
The law provides for the right to a fair and public trial without undue delay, and an
independent judiciary generally enforced this right. Defendants are presumed
innocent and have the right to be informed of the charges against them. Courts
provide free interpretation services as needed, including sign language
interpretation, unless a court decides to recover procedural expenses from a
defendant found guilty. The law also extends to all defendants the right to be
present at their own trial in the court of first instance (but not during appeals); to
communicate with an attorney of their choice (or one provided at public expense);
to receive adequate time and facilities to prepare a defense; to confront witnesses;
to present one’s own witnesses and evidence; to not be compelled to testify or
confess guilt; and to appeal. NGOs and observers reported that authorities
sometimes did not observe these rights and that bribery of judges, prosecutors, and
expert witnesses sometimes contributed to unwarranted convictions, dismissals, or
reductions of sentences.
Procedural due process errors and inconsistencies often plagued trials. Although
the number of government-provided defense lawyers was adequate, their quality
and experience were inconsistent and many defendants lacked adequate legal
representation. Judges often relied on confessions with little corroborating
evidence. Furthermore, NGOs reported witness intimidation by government
authorities and police, limited public access to trials (often due to lack of space), a
lack of transparency in courts’ decision-making processes, and a low level of
awareness regarding new criminal and procedural laws.
Administrative and judicial remedies are available for alleged human rights
violations. The government sometimes failed to enforce court orders pertaining to
human rights.
Property Restitution
pasturelands. Some herders reported they were forced to relocate after their
pastureland was sold and mining companies denied them access to water wells.
The law prohibits such actions, and there were no reports the government failed to
respect these prohibitions.
The law provides for freedom of expression, including for the press, and the
government generally respected this right, although it imposed some content
restrictions, licensing could be problematic, and there was reported harassment of
journalists. These problems contributed to occasional self-censorship.
The ownership and political affiliations of the media often were not disclosed to
the public, and a Globe International survey found that 23.3 percent of journalists
reported they did not cover some stories due to their media outlet’s financial and
personal relationships with political officials and business elites. The Mongolian
Center for Investigative Journalism also reported that journalists sometimes
practiced self-censorship for the same reasons.
The law provides an exception during election campaign season, when fines of
450,000 to 5.4 million tugriks ($175 to $2,100) or imprisonment from one month
to one year apply for spreading false information that defames political parties,
coalitions, or candidates running for office. The law imposes additional
restrictions against media during campaign periods; penalties include suspending a
media organization’s license for six months for defamation and dissemination of
false information.
The law provides media an option to seek redress against a person who, by threats
of violence, attempted bribery, or other means of intimidation, seeks to compel a
media outlet (or other entity) to withhold critical information about that person. In
such cases the media outlet may seek a criminal complaint or file a civil complaint
against the threatening person. If convicted, that person is subject to a fine of from
450,000 to 2.7 million tugriks ($175 to $1,050), revocation of the right to travel
from one to six months, one to six months’ imprisonment, or both.
Internet Freedom
By law individuals and groups may engage in the peaceful expression of views on
the internet. The government restricted internet content deemed pornographic or
presenting extreme violence. It maintained a list of blocked websites and added
sites to the list for alleged violations of relevant laws and regulations, including
those relating to intellectual property. At the end of September, the government
had blocked 596 websites.
websites with heavy traffic to use filtering software that makes publicly visible the
internet protocol addresses of those commenting or sharing content.
There were reports police interviewed individuals following complaints they made
derogatory online posts and comments. Such cases were routinely resolved outside
the formal court process. For example, the parties might agree on the removal of
the content, the issuance of an apology, or payment of a fine.
Internet access was widely available to the country’s urban population and was
increasingly more available in rural areas. According to the International
Telecommunication Union, 24 percent of the population had access to the internet
in 2017.
The law provides for the freedoms of peaceful assembly and association, and the
government generally respected these rights.
c. Freedom of Religion
d. Freedom of Movement
The law provides for freedom of internal movement, foreign travel, emigration,
and repatriation, and the government generally respected these rights. The
government generally cooperated with the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and other humanitarian organizations in
providing protection and assistance to UNHCR-recognized refugees, asylum
seekers, and other persons of concern.
Foreign Travel: Under the criminal code, at the request of the Prosecutor
General’s Office, courts can ban the departure of persons who are plotting criminal
activity. The law requires that those subject to an exit ban receive timely
notification. Authorities did not allow persons under exit bans to leave until the
disputes leading to the bans were resolved administratively or by court decision,
and bans may remain in place for years. According to reports 500 persons,
including several foreign residents, remained banned from leaving the country.
Protection of Refugees
Access to Asylum: The constitution provides for granting asylum, and the
government provided limited protections to foreign residents in the country while
UNHCR adjudicated their refugee claims. The law establishes deportation criteria
and permits the Agency for Foreign Citizens and Naturalization (the country’s
immigration agency) to deport asylum seekers who it deems do not qualify.
Employment: The law does not afford a specific legal status to refugees and
asylum seekers; by default, therefore, authorities usually treated them as irregular
migrants and did not issued them work permits.
Access to Basic Services: Because the law does not provide for refugee status,
asylum seekers generally did not have access to government-provided basic
services such as health care and education. Refugees and asylum seekers could
access private medical facilities with UNHCR support.
The law provides citizens the ability to choose their government in free and fair
periodic elections held by secret ballot and based on universal and equal suffrage.
Recent Elections: The most recent national elections were the 2017 presidential
elections and the 2016 parliamentary election. In a 2017 report, an Organization
for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) limited election observation
mission assessed the presidential elections as orderly and efficient. The mission,
however, noted allegations of vote buying and candidates’ involvement in
corruption during the presidential elections. The OSCE noted there was legal
uncertainty surrounding the first-ever presidential runoff in 2017 because the
electoral legal framework contained few runoff provisions. While the General
Election Commission issued clarifying regulations in a timely manner, there was
widespread perception that parties blurred the line between governing and
campaigning between the two rounds of voting.
The law provides criminal penalties for corruption by officials, but the government
did not always implement the law effectively, and corruption continued at all
levels. Some officials engaged in corrupt practices with impunity. The
government implemented the second year of a three-year action plan, the National
Program Combatting Corruption, adopted in 2016. The criminal code contains
strict liability provisions for corruption and corruption-related offenses for public
servants and government officials. For example, the code dictates that those
sentenced for corruption may not work in public service.
The criminal code offers immunity from punishment to any persons who reported
they bribed an official at the official’s request. In addition, an amendment
criminalizes the misuse of an official position to offer or give preference to close
associates or family members when awarding contracts. Nonetheless, private
enterprises reported instances in which government employees pressured them to
pay bribes to act on applications, obtain permits, and complete registrations.
Members of parliament are immune from prosecution during their tenure in all
cases unless they are caught at the scene of a crime with damaging evidence
against them.
The IAAC is the principal agency responsible for investigating corruption, assisted
at times by the NPA’s Organized Crime Division. Although questions about the
IAAC’s political impartiality persisted, the public viewed the agency as effective.
It utilized a standard operating procedure to guide the correct handling of
investigations of corruption allegations. It permitted only electronic tender
submissions and maintained a black list of companies that violated rules on
government procurement. The IAAC conducted training for 6,000 public officials.
It also sponsored several public awareness campaigns on television, in social
media, and in press conferences that highlighted its work.
The IAAC gained investigatory responsibility for crimes committed by police and
military personnel. Consequently, its workload increased fourfold over 2017;
however, there were no plans to increase IAAC staffing. The IAAC also
established a citizen’s oversight committee that consisted of 153 members from the
public at the local level who monitor whether elected officials follow the
anticorruption law.
Financial Disclosure: The law requires civil servants to report holdings and
outside sources of income for themselves, their spouses, parents, children, and live-
in siblings. It also aims to prevent conflicts of interest between official duties and
the private interests of those in public service roles, and to regulate and monitor
conflicts of interest to specify that officials act in the public interest. The law
requires candidates for public office to submit financial statements and
questionnaires on personal business interests to be eligible to run.
Public officials must electronically file a private interest declaration with the IAAC
within 30 days of appointment or election and annually thereafter during their
terms of public service. The law provides that such declarations be accessible to
the public and prescribes a range of administrative sanctions and disciplinary
actions. Violators may receive formal warnings, face salary reductions, or be
dismissed from their positions. The IAAC is required to review the asset
declarations of public servants, including police officers and members of the
military. According to the IAAC, all public officials filed the required
documentation in a timely manner. The IAAC made public for the first time the
financial disclosure short forms for approximately 40,000 of the country’s 170,000
public officials. The IAAC received a 2.5 percent increase in complaints related to
alleged conflicts of interest.
There was some collaboration between the government and civil society in
discussing human rights problems. NGOs and international organizations noted,
however, that government officials were less open to including NGOs in the legal
drafting process, preparation of official reports on social and human rights
problems, and contracting with the government to implement social services.
Women
Rape and Domestic Violence: The criminal code outlaws sexual intercourse
through physical violence, or threat of violence, and provides for sentences of one
The nongovernmental National Center against Violence (NCAV) and the NPA
both reported during the year that police response to domestic violence complaints
improved. Moreover, better training of justice-sector actors and the enactment of
31 new regulations designed to improve the implementation of domestic violence
law contributed to an increase in convictions for domestic violence during the year.
Although the law provides alternative measures of protection for victims of
domestic abuse, including restraining orders, procedural and other barriers made
these difficult to obtain and enforce.
The NCAV expanded its activities designed to support victims, including training
for medical personnel who delivered services to deaf victims of domestic violence.
According to the NPA, there were nine shelters and 10 one-stop service centers for
domestic violence survivors run by a variety of NGOs, local government agencies,
and hospitals. The one-stop service centers, located primarily at hospitals,
provided emergency shelter for a maximum of 72 hours. The relatively small
number of shelters located in rural areas presented a challenge for domestic
violence victims in those areas. The NCAV, which operated three shelters in the
country, including two in rural areas, did not receive government funding during
the first nine months of the year despite a law that requires such funding.
Sexual Harassment: The criminal code does not include sexual harassment as a
crime. NGOs said there was a lack of awareness and consensus within society of
what constituted inappropriate behavior, making it difficult to gauge the extent of
the problem.
Discrimination: The law provides the same legal status and rights to women and
men, including equal pay for equal work and equal access to education. These
rights were generally observed, although women faced discrimination in
employment.
The law sets mandatory minimum quotas for women in the government and
political parties. It also outlaws discrimination based on sex, appearance, or age,
although some NGOs noted authorities did not enforce this provision.
In most cases the divorced wife retained custody of any children; divorced
husbands often failed to pay child support and did so without penalty. Women’s
activists said that because family businesses and properties usually were registered
under the husband’s name, ownership continued to be transferred automatically to
the former husband in divorce cases.
Children
Child Abuse: The criminal code includes a specific chapter on crimes against
children, including forced begging, abandonment, inducing addiction, engaging
children in criminal activity or pornography, and the trafficking and abuse of
children.
Child abandonment was also a problem. Some children were orphaned or ran
away from home because of poverty-related neglect or parental abuse. Police
officials stated they sent children of abusive parents to shelters, but some observers
indicated many youths were returned to abusive parents. According to the
FCYDA, as of November there were 1,045 children living in 31 care centers,
including orphanages.
Each province and all of Ulaanbaatar’s district police offices had a specialized
police officer appointed to investigate crimes against, or committed by, juveniles.
The FCYDA and Ministry of Justice and Home Affairs maintained 609 local task
forces to prevent child abuse.
Early and Forced Marriage: The legal minimum age for marriage is 18 years, with
court-approved exceptions for minors age 16 to 18 who obtain the consent of
parents or guardians. There were no reports of underage or forced marriages.
NGOs reported that online child pornography was relatively common. Although
police took steps to improve their capacity to investigate such crimes and initiated
the “unfriend movement” to increase protection of children online, technical
expertise remained limited. Of 192 reported cases of child sexual abuse, police
formally opened only 22 criminal cases for further investigation. The maximum
penalty for engaging children in pornography under the criminal code is eight
years’ imprisonment.
International Child Abductions: The country is not a party to the 1980 Hague
Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. See the
Department of State’s Annual Report on International Parental Child Abduction at
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/International-Parental-Child-
Abduction/for-providers/legal-reports-and-data.html.
Anti-Semitism
The Jewish population was very small, and there were no reports of anti-Semitic
acts. Neo-Nazi groups active in the country tended to target other Asian
nationalities and not Jews.
Trafficking in Persons
The law prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities, defining these as
restrictions due to permanent impairment of the body or intellectual, mental, or
sensory capacities. Prohibitions against discrimination in employment against
persons with disabilities are limited.
The president has an adviser on disability issues, and the prime minister chairs the
Council for Implementing the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which aims to
enforce disabilities-related law; facilitate equal participation; and improve social,
educational, health, and labor services for persons with disabilities.
Although the law mandates standards for physical access to new public buildings
and a representative of persons with disabilities serves on the state commission for
inspecting standards of new buildings, most new buildings were not constructed in
compliance with the law. Public transport remained largely inaccessible to persons
with disabilities. Emergency services were often inaccessible to blind and deaf
persons because service providers lacked trained personnel and appropriate
technologies. Moreover, domestic violence shelters were not accessible to persons
with disabilities.
The LGBT Center noted that despite increased police awareness of abuses faced by
the LGBTI community and capacity to respond to problems affecting LGBTI
persons, there were still reported cases involving police harassment of LGBTI
victims of alleged crimes. Authorities frequently dismissed charges when a crime
victim was an LGBTI person.
Although there was no official discrimination against those with HIV/AIDS, some
societal discrimination existed. The public generally continued to associate
HIV/AIDS with same-sex sexual activity, burdening victims with social stigma and
potential employment discrimination.
The law provides for the right of workers to form or join independent unions and
professional organizations of their choosing without previous authorization or
excessive requirements. The law provides for the rights of all workers except
those employed in essential services to participate in union activities without
discrimination, conduct strikes, and bargain collectively. The law requires
reinstatement of workers fired for union activity.
Laws providing for the rights of collective bargaining and freedom of association
generally were enforced. Penalties, largely fines, for violations of freedom of
association and collective bargaining provisions were not sufficient to deter
violations. The tripartite Labor Dispute Settlement Committee resolved the
The CMTU stated that some employees faced obstacles, including the threat of
salary deductions, to forming, joining, or participating in unions. Some employers
prohibited workers from participating in union activities during work hours. The
CMTU also stated workers terminated for union activity were not always
reinstated. The CMTU further reported some employers took steps to weaken
existing unions. For example, some companies used the portion of employees’
salaries deducted for union dues for other purposes and did not forward the monies
to the unions. The CMTU also reported some employers refused to conclude
collective bargaining agreements.
There were several strikes during the year over the salary of public servants. For
example, a teacher’s strike that lasted nine days concluded after the government
increased all public servants’ salaries, with the exception of judges and
prosecutors, between 8 and 30 percent depending on salary grade.
The constitution prohibits all forms of forced or compulsory labor, except as part
of a legally imposed sentence. The criminal code provides for a fine or
imprisonment for forced labor offenses, but penalties were not sufficient to deter
violations. NGOs and government officials noted the low number of inspectors
and a lack of public awareness limited effective enforcement of the law.
There were isolated reports of forced labor, including forced child labor. There
were reports workers from the DPRK and China were vulnerable to forced labor in
construction, production, agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, wholesale and
retail trade, automobile maintenance, and mining industries. Press reports
suggested, and government officials confirmed, that a large proportion of wages
due to laborers from the DPRK went directly to the DPRK government, and
workers’ freedom of movement was limited by requirements they travel in the
company of a DPRK supervisor (see section 7.e.).
The law prohibits children younger than age 14 years from working. By law at age
14 children may work a maximum of 30 hours per week, with parental and
government permission, to acquire vocational training and work experience. At
age 15 children may conclude an employment contract with permission from
parents or guardians. According to a Ministry of Labor and Social Protection
order, children younger than age 18 may not work in hazardous occupations such
as mining and construction; engage in arduous work; serve as child jockeys during
the winter (children may be jockeys beginning at seven years during other
seasons); participate in cultural, circus, or folk art performances at night; work in
businesses that sell alcoholic beverages; or engage in roadside vending.
Authorities reported employers often did not follow the law, requiring minors to
work in excess of 40 hours per week and paying them less than the minimum
wage.
The criminal code’s child protection provisions cover hazardous child labor, which
is punishable by a maximum one year in prison. Persons who involved children in
“vagrancy and beggary” are subject to a maximum five years’ imprisonment. The
government did not effectively enforce the law; there were no government
prosecutions or convictions of forced child labor during the year.
There was no government funding for programs to prevent child labor and support
employment of adult family members.
Child labor, including cases of forced child labor, was suspected in many sectors,
including the hotels and restaurants, in manufacturing, petty trade, scavenging and
forced begging, event or street contortionism (a local art form), and the illicit sex
trade (see section 6, Children). In the year to November, the FCYDA and the
General Agency for Specialized Inspection (GASI) conducted child labor
inspections, including at artisanal mining sites, public markets, service centers,
dumpsites, construction and transportation sites, and on farms. Following the
inspections, FCYDA and GASI reported there were 495 children working in the
informal sector (20 in artisanal mining, 82 at public markets, 12 at dumpsites, 14 at
construction and transportation sites, and 367 in farming). Of these 495 children,
83 were girls, 236 had dropped out of school, and 27 were engaged in hazardous
labor, including 15 in sorting and packing fluorspar.
and young children traditionally served as jockeys during the annual Naadam
festival, where races ranged from two to 20 miles. According to GASI, 28,889
child jockeys (of whom 20 were younger than the required minimum of seven
years) raced during the year. Although the government in 2016 prohibited child
jockeys from working from November 1 to May 1, in 2017 it amended this
prohibition to apply only to “winter.” The NHRC, NGOs, and human rights
activists criticized this change because the provision is vague and allows child
horse jockeys to work as early as January. Despite the “winter” ban, during just
one horse race early in the year, 24 children fell from horses and five children lost
consciousness. In January the government decreed 12 as the minimum age for
child jockeys in “spring” races (races that occur after the annual Lunar New Year
and before June 1). Also in January, eight of 21 provincial governors banned child
jockeys from racing from November 1 to May 1.
Regulations also require adequate headgear and chest protection, but despite
greater government and public attention to safety, enforcement was inconsistent.
For example, GASI reported that of the 28,889 child jockeys, 336 lacked helmets,
513 did not have sufficient equipment, and 1,174 did not have insurance coverage.
Observers reported sufficient compliance with safety regulations at national races
(but less compliance at community and regional events). The FCYDA and GASI
maintained a database to register all jockeys participating in officially sanctioned
national and local races. The FCYDA collected biometric information to better
track jockeys and prevent children younger than seven years from working as
jockeys.
Also see the Department of Labor’s Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor
at www.dol.gov/ilab/reports/child-labor/findings.
also prohibits women from working in occupations that require heavy labor or
exposure to chemicals that could affect infant and maternal health.
The government enforced the law in a limited manner, and discrimination occurred
in employment and occupation based on sex and disability, as well as on sexual
orientation, gender identity, and HIV status.
The law charges employers with taking steps to prevent sexual harassment in the
workplace, including by establishing internal rules about sexual harassment and the
redress of complaints, but provides no penalties. The NHRC reported poor
knowledge of the law’s sexual harassment provisions among both employers and
employees.
The NHRC found employers were less likely to hire, promote, or provide
professional development opportunities to women. There were also reports some
employers refused to hire overweight persons, falsely claiming they could not
perform essential job functions.
Although the law requires workplaces with more than 25 employees to employ a
minimum of 4 percent of persons with disabilities or pay a fine, NGOs reported a
reluctance to hire them persisted, and many companies preferred to pay the fine.
They also noted the government itself failed to meet the quota. Members of the
disability community noted that, even when hired, the lack of accessible public
transport made it difficult for persons with disabilities to hold a job (see section 6,
Persons with Disabilities).
The labor ministry’s Department for the Development of Persons with Disabilities
is responsible for developing and implementing employment policies and projects
for persons with disabilities. Government organizations and NGOs reported
employers’ attitude toward employing persons with disabilities had not improved
and many employers still preferred to pay fines to the Employment Fund rather
than employ persons with disabilities. For example, observers suspected
discrimination against persons with disabilities in a case where a school principal
asked a janitor with disabilities to submit her letter of resignation before she
reached retirement age.
NGOs, the NHRC, and members of the LGBTI community reported that
companies rarely hired LGBTI persons who were open about their sexual
orientation or gender identity, and LGBTI persons who revealed their status in the
workplace frequently faced discrimination, including the possibility of dismissal.
Foreign migrant workers did not receive the same level of protection against labor
law violations as the general population.
The minimum wage was 240,000 tugriks ($92) per month and applied to both
public- and private-sector workers. According to the CMTU, the minimum wage
did not provide an adequate standard of living.
Laws on labor, cooperatives, and enterprises set occupational health and safety
standards, which apply equally to local and foreign workers. GASI noted many
standards were outdated.
Labor inspectors assigned to GASI’s regional and local offices are responsible for
enforcement of all labor regulations and have the authority to compel immediate
compliance. Enforcement of minimum wage, working hours, and occupational
safety and health laws and regulations was limited due to the small number of
labor inspectors. According to GASI neither the penalty nor the number of
inspectors was sufficient to enforce compliance. GASI reported its inspectors,
faced with large investigative workloads, needed better training on investigative
techniques and evidence collection. Inspectors generally did not conduct
inspections in the informal sector.
GASI acknowledged that fines imposed on companies for not complying with
labor standards or for concealing accidents were insufficient to induce
management to resolve problems. The CMTU also reported government agencies
and enterprises often failed to comply with regulations requiring them to allocate
budget resources to workplace safety. Moreover, safety experts responsible for
labor safety and health were often inexperienced or had not received training.
The law on pensions allows for participation by small family businesses and
workers in the informal economy (such as herders) in pension and social benefit
programs. These categories of workers were able to access health care, education,
social entitlements, and an optional form of social security.
Many workers received less than the minimum wage, particularly at smaller
companies in rural areas. The CMTU also expressed concern workers in the
Many foreign workers, the majority of whom were Chinese mining and
construction workers, reportedly worked in conditions that did not meet
government regulations. GASI reported it inspected workplace health and safety
conditions for foreign workers but did not have the authority to monitor wages or
inspect living conditions.
The status of an estimated 600 workers from the DPRK was largely unknown;
secrecy surrounded their contractual agreements, labor rights, and compensation.
NGOs reported the government assumed little jurisdiction over DPRK workers’
contracts, relying on agreements with the DPRK government and the actions of
intermediary companies. These workers were employed in many sectors,
especially during the summer, reportedly in harsh working and living conditions.
Observers and government officials stated that DPRK laborers likely failed to
receive the minimum wage, often worked in substandard conditions, and had much
of their wages paid directly to the DPRK government.