Scribd
Upload
241 views1 page

G.R. No. 220434

This case involved a managerial employee, Theodore Ang, who was dismissed by SM Development Corporation for alleged neglectful acts and violations that caused a loss of trust and confidence. Ang filed a case claiming illegal dismissal. While the labor arbiter and NLRC ruled in favor of dismissal, the Court of Appeals reversed and ordered reinstatement. The Supreme Court then reversed the Court of Appeals decision, finding that the two conditions for a valid dismissal based on loss of trust and confidence were satisfied - Ang held a position of trust, and committed acts justifying the loss of trust. The petitioners were ordered to pay nominal damages for procedural due process violations.

Uploaded by

Magr Esca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
241 views1 page

G.R. No. 220434

This case involved a managerial employee, Theodore Ang, who was dismissed by SM Development Corporation for alleged neglectful acts and violations that caused a loss of trust and confidence. Ang filed a case claiming illegal dismissal. While the labor arbiter and NLRC ruled in favor of dismissal, the Court of Appeals reversed and ordered reinstatement. The Supreme Court then reversed the Court of Appeals decision, finding that the two conditions for a valid dismissal based on loss of trust and confidence were satisfied - Ang held a position of trust, and committed acts justifying the loss of trust. The petitioners were ordered to pay nominal damages for procedural due process violations.

Uploaded by

Magr Esca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

G.R. No. 220434.

July 22, 2019

SM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, JOANN HIZON, ATTY. MENA OJEDA, JR., and ROSALINE QUA,
petitioners, vs. TEODORE GILBERT ANG, respondent.

Facts of the case:

The case arose from a case filed by Theodore Ang against SMDC with money claims. Ang was asked to
explain certain issues regarding Field Residences. He denied allegations and included documents to
negate the allegation of cost overrun. He was called by Hizon and was made to receive the
Memorandum with subject Show Cause Notice, which contains, among others, the following: (a)
direction for him to explain more accusations therein enumerated within five working days; (b) direction
for him to turn-over work to Landicho; (c) informing him of a 30-day preventive suspension without pay.

Thereafter, he was suspended without pay for thirty days. After serving the penalty, he was served with
a termination letter dated May 15, 2012.

He then filed for illegal dismissal with money claims. The Labor arbiter dismissed the complained based
on the belief that there were valid grounds for dismissal.

Ang appealed at the NLRC which affirmed the decision of the Labor Arbiter to his failure to explain his
neglectful act and violations. Ang was dismissed due to loss of trust and confidence.

He filed for certiorari in the Court o Appeals. The Courts of Appeals reversed the decision of the labor
tribunals and ruled : (1) reinstate respondent without loss of seniority rights and other privileges; (2)
pay full backwages, inclusive of allowances and other benefits or their monetary equivalent, computed
from the time his compensation was withheld up to the time of his actual reinstatement; and (3) pay
attorney's fees equivalent to 10% of the total monetary award.

Issue:

Whether or not managerial employee may be dismissed for loss of trust and confidence and whether or
not

Held:

Article 297 (c) 22 of the Labor Code. To justify a valid dismissal based on loss of trust and confidence, the
concurrence of two (2) conditions must be satisfied: (1) the employee concerned must be holding a
position of trust and confidence; and (2) there must be an act that would justify the loss of trust and
confidence. These two requisites are present in this case.

The petition for Motion for Reconsideration is meritorious. The Decision dated October 2, 2014 and
Resolution dated September 1, 2015 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 131399 are REVERSED
and SET ASIDE. The Decision dated April 26, 2013 of the National Labor Relations Commission is hereby
REINSTATED. For non-compliance with procedural due process, the petitioners are ORDERED to pay
respondent nominal damages in the amount of P30,000.00.

You might also like