A Job Evaluation project is normally undertaken for managerial / supervisory /
specialist / technical positions and the subordinate positions in the organizational
hierarchy. Executive positions such as President, Vice-President, and School
Director are exempted from coverage in recognition of the prerogative of the Board
of Directors or the Board of Trustees of the institution to decide on the
compensation and economic rewards package for such positions. Moreover, it is
difficult to separate individual contributions from the job itself. At the executive
level, the incumbent helps define the job and its value to the organization. To
force people at this level to conform to narrowly defined job descriptions can rob
the organization of personal volition to contribute to organizational interests and of
much-needed creativity in the performance of the concomitant functions.
SITUATIONS REQUIRING JOB EVALUATION
      While Job Evaluation should be a natural component part of the Human
Resource Management System of an institution, the need to undertake it becomes
more pronounced under the following circumstances:
1. A widespread dissatisfaction and often enough, arising disputes and grumbling
   as regards the salary structure, with claims being made that:
          a.        similar work does not result in equal pay,
          b.        equal pay is given to dissimilar work,
          c.       differences in pay are not related to the magnitude of
          responsibilities associated with the work actually performed, or
          d.        unbalanced viewpoint on the worth of a job,
          e.       favoritism and other personal considerations are perceived to be
          the major factors in salary determination.
          f.        salary setting has been quite subjective and haphazard on
          account of the absence of formal structures and processes to determine
          how much to give to a particular employee in terms of starting pay or
          salary increase.
2. Concern that some employees are underpaid in relation to their responsibilities
   (not workload, since work overload is best addressed by additional staff) and
   the institution wishes to eliminate such discrimination by linking the salary
   associated with a position more systematically to its job content.
3. The job content, in terms of duties and responsibilities, of the different
   positions in the organization may have substantially changed through the
   years so that