IE Matrix of Nike Company
High 3-4
 EFE
       Medium 2-2.99
        Low 1-1.99
                             Strong 3-4               Average 2-2.99            Weak 1-1.99
                                                          IFE
The IE matrix is based on the following two criteria, these are the Score from the EFE matrix --
this score is plotted on the y- axis and in the Score from the IFE matrix -- plotted on the x-axis
The IE matrix works in a way that you plot the total weighted score from the EFE matrix on the
y axis and draw a horizontal line across the plane. Then you take the score calculated in the IFE
matrix, plot it on the x axis, and draw a vertical line across the plane. The point where your
horizontal line meets your vertical line is the determinant of your strategy. This point shows the
strategy that your company should follow.
          On the x axis of the IE Matrix, an IFE total weighted score of 1.0 to 1.99 represents a
weak internal position. A score of 2.0 to 2.99 is considered average. A score of 3.0 to 4.0 is
strong.
          On the y axis, an EFE total weighted score of 1.0 to 1.99 is considered low. A score of
2.0 to 2.99 is medium. A score of 3.0 to 4.0 is high. Your horizontal and vertical lines meet in
one of the nine cells in the IE matrix. You should follow a strategy depending on in which cell
those lines intersect.
          Based on the result of the analysis the company should grow and build strategy. This
means intensive and aggressive tactical strategies is not really good in the operation of the
company.
 IE Matrix of Ford motor Company
Hold and Maintain
        The IE matrix can be divided into three major regions that have different strategy
 implications. Cells I, II, and III suggest that grow and build strategy. This means intensive and
 aggressive tactical strategies. Your strategies should focus on market penetration, market
 development, and product development. From the operational perspective, a backward
 integration, forward integration, and horizontal integration should also be considered.
        Cells IV, V, and VI suggest the hold and maintain strategy. In this case, your tactical
 strategies should focus on market penetration and product development.
        Cells VII, VIII, and IX are characterized with the harvest or exit strategy. If costs for
 rejuvenating the business are low, then it should be attempted to revitalize the business. In other
 cases, aggressive cost management is a way to play the end game.
Based on the plot of ford cmpany should maintain their strategy.
IFE Matrix
 Key Internal Factors                                                   Weights Rating     Weighted
                                                                                            Score
                                                                        0.0 to   1, 2, 3
                                                                        1.0      or 4
 Internal Strengths                                                              3 or 4     
 Strong and globally positioned brand names                             0.13     4         0.52
 Large employee base with highly educated engineers and good            0.09     3         0.27
 R&D department
 One of the largest automotive manufacturer (along with a long          0.06     3         0.18
 history)
 1285% increase in net cash                                             0.09     3         0.27
 Huge increase in total equity                                          0.11     4         0.44
 Internal Weaknesses                                                             1 or 2     
     A    lot of time spent to actually put the product on the market   0.1      2         0.2
 Recording continuous losses (net income) from 2006                     0.12     1         0.12
 Low quality of new products (recalls - causing losing customers)       0.12     1         0.12
 Bad management of the company                                          0.08     2         0.16
 EPS very bad - in negative numbers (unattractive for the               0.1      1         0.1
 investors)
 Totals                                                                 1                  2.38