Scribd
Upload
64 views1 page

Rubric: Category 4 3 2 1 Introduction

The rubric outlines 5 categories for evaluating papers: introduction, quality of information/evidence, support of analysis, organization/development of paper, and conclusion. For each category, it describes the characteristics of papers that would score a 4 (exceptional), 3 (proficient), 2 (basic), or 1 (weak). Papers that receive the highest scores have exceptionally well-researched, detailed information that clearly relates to the thesis, make consistent and critical connections between evidence and thesis, and have clear and logical organization that thoroughly develops the thesis.

Uploaded by

Sheryl Lynn Dimaayo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
64 views1 page

Rubric: Category 4 3 2 1 Introduction

The rubric outlines 5 categories for evaluating papers: introduction, quality of information/evidence, support of analysis, organization/development of paper, and conclusion. For each category, it describes the characteristics of papers that would score a 4 (exceptional), 3 (proficient), 2 (basic), or 1 (weak). Papers that receive the highest scores have exceptionally well-researched, detailed information that clearly relates to the thesis, make consistent and critical connections between evidence and thesis, and have clear and logical organization that thoroughly develops the thesis.

Uploaded by

Sheryl Lynn Dimaayo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Rubric

CATEGORY 4 3 2 1
Introduction/ *exceptional introduction *proficient introduction *basic introduction that *weak or no
that grabs interest of reader that is interesting and states topic but lacks introduction of topic.
and states topic. states topic. interest. **paper’s purpose is
unclear/thesis is weak
or missing.

Quality of *paper is exceptionally *information relates to *information relates to *information has little
researched, extremely the main topic. the main topic, few or nothing to do with
Information/ detailed, and historically **paper is well- details and/or examples the thesis.
Evidence accurate. researched in detail and are given. **information has
____ **information clearly from a variety of **shows a limited weak or no
relates to the thesis. sources. variety of sources. connection to the
thesis.

Support of *exceptionally critical, *consistent connections *some connections *limited or no


relevant and consistent made between evidence made between evidence connections made
Analysis connections made between and thesis and thesis. between evidence and
____ evidence and thesis. **good analysis. **some analysis. thesis.
**excellent analysis. **lack of analysis.

Organization/ *exceptionally clear, *clear and logical order *somewhat clear and *lacks development
logical, mature, and that supports thesis logical development of ideas with weak or
Development of thorough development of with good transitions with basic transitions no transitions between
paper thesis with excellent between and within between and within and within
____ transitions between and paragraphs. paragraphs. paragraphs.
within paragraphs.

Conclusion *excellent summary of *good summary of *basic summary of topic *lack of summary of
topic with concluding ideas topic with clear with some final topic.
____ that impact reader. concluding ideas. concluding ideas.
**introduces no new **introduces no new **introduces no new
information. information. information.

You might also like