Scribd
Upload
7 views2 pages

Writing Rubric Score

The document presents a writing rubric adapted from Weigle, outlining scoring criteria across four main aspects: Content, Organization, Vocabulary, and Language Use. Each aspect is graded on a scale from 1 (Very Poor) to 4 (Excellent to Very Good), with specific criteria detailing the expectations for each score level. The rubric aims to provide a structured evaluation of writing quality based on knowledge, development, organization, vocabulary usage, and language accuracy.

Uploaded by

Barata yuda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
7 views2 pages

Writing Rubric Score

The document presents a writing rubric adapted from Weigle, outlining scoring criteria across four main aspects: Content, Organization, Vocabulary, and Language Use. Each aspect is graded on a scale from 1 (Very Poor) to 4 (Excellent to Very Good), with specific criteria detailing the expectations for each score level. The rubric aims to provide a structured evaluation of writing quality based on knowledge, development, organization, vocabulary usage, and language accuracy.

Uploaded by

Barata yuda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Writing rubric score

Adapted from Weigle

Aspects Score Level Criteria


 Knowledgeable
EXCELLENT TO  Substantive
4  Thorough development of thesis
VERY GOOD
 Relevant to assigned topic
 Some knowledge of subject
GOOD TO  Adequate range
3  Limited development of thesis
AVERAGE
 Mostly relevant to topic, but lacks detail
Content
 Limited knowledge of subject
2 FAIR TO POOR  Little substance
 Inadequate development of topic
 Does not show knowledge of subject
 Non-substantive
1 VERY POOR  Not pertinent
 OR not enough to evaluate
 Fluent expression
 Ideas clearly stated/supported
EXCELLENT TO  Succinct
4  Well organized
VERY GOOD
 Logical sequencing
 Cohesive
 Somewhat choppy
GOOD TO  Loosely organized ideas but main ideas stand out
Organization 3  Limited support
AVERAGE
 Logical but incomplete sequencing
 Non-fluent
2 FAIR TO POOR  Ideas confused or disconnected
 Lacks logical sequencing and development
 Does not communicate
1 VERY POOR  No organization
 OR not enough to evaluate
Vocabulary  Sophisticated range
EXCELLENT TO  Effective word/idiom choice and usage
4  Word form mastery
VERY GOOD
 Appropriate register
3 GOOD TO  Adequate range
AVERAGE
 Occasional errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage but
meaning not obscured
 Limited range
2 FAIR TO POOR  Frequent errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage
 Meaning confused or obscured
 Essentiall translation
 Little knowledge of English vocabulary, idioms, word
1 VERY POOR form
 OR not enough to evaluate
 Effective complex constructions
EXCELLENT TO  View errors of agreement, tense, number, word —
4
VERY GOOD order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions
 Effective but simple constructions
 Minor problems’ in complex constructions
GOOD TO  Several errors of agreement, tense, number, word —
3
AVERAGE order/function, articles, pronouns, preposition but
meaning seldom obscured
Language
 Major problems in simple/complex construction
Use
 Frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense, number,
2 FAIR TO POOR word order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions
and /or fragments, run-ons, deletions
 Meaning coonfused or obscured
 Virtually no mastery of sentence construction rules
 Dominated by errors
1 VERY POOR  Does not communicate
OR not enough to evaluate

You might also like