TABLE 1
THE RANGESCORE OF CONTEST
Range Score Descriptions
30-27 (Excellent to very good) Knowledgeable, substantive, through
development of theirs, relevant to assigned topic.
26-22 (Good to average) Some knowledge of subject, adequate range.
limited development of thesis, mostly relevant to
topic, but lacks detail.
21-17 (Fair to poor) Limited knowledge of subject, little substance,
inadequate development of topic.
16-13 (Very poor) Does not show knowledge of subject, non-
substantive, not pertinent, or not enough to
evaluate.
TABLE 2
THE RANGE SCORE OF ORGANIZATION
Range Score Descriptions
20-18 (Excellent to very good) Fluent expression, ideas clearly stated/supported,
succinct, well-organized, logical sequencing.
Cohesive.
17-14 (Good to average) Somewhat choppy, loosely organized but main
ideas stand out, limited supported, logical but
incomplete sequencing.
13-10 (Fair to poor) Non-fluent, ideas confused or disconnected, lacks
logical sequencing and development.
9.7 (Very poor) Does not communicate, no organization, or not
enough to evaluate.
TABLE 3
THE RANGE SCORE OF VOCABULARY
Range Score Descriptions
20-18 (Excellent to very good) Sophisticated range, effective word idiom choice
and usage, word form mastery, appropriate
register.
17-14 (Good to average) Adequate range, occasional errors of w idiom
form, choice, usage but meaning obscured
13-10 (Fair to poor) Limited range, frequent errors of word/ idiom
form, choice, usage, meaning confused or
obscured
9.7 (Very poor) Essentially translation, little knowledge of English
vocabulary, idiom, word form, or not enough to
evaluate.
TABLE 4
THE RANGE SCORE OF LANGUAGE USE
Range Score Descriptions
25-22 (Excellent to very good) Effective complex constructions, minor problems
in complex construction, several errors of
agreement. tense number. word order/function,
articles, pronoun, preposition.
21-18 (Good average) Effective but simple construction, minor problems
in complex construction, several errors of
agreement, tense, number, word/order function,
articles, pronouns, prepositions but meaning
seldom obscured.
17-11 (Fair to poor) Major problems in simple complex construction,
frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense,
number, word order/ function, article, pronouns,
prepositions, and/or fragment, run-ons, deletions
meaning confused or obscured.
10-5 (Very poor) Virtually no mastery of sentence construction
rules, dominated by errors, does not communicate,
or not enough to evaluate.
TABLE 5
THE RANGE SCORE OF MECHANICS
Range Score Descriptions
5 (Excellent to very good) Demonstrates mastery of convention, few errors
spelling, punctuation, capitalization, of
paragraphing
4 (Good to average) Occasional errors of spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, paragraphing but meaning not
obscured
3 (Fair to poor) Frequent errors of spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, paragraphing, poor handwriting.
meaning confused or obscured
2 (Very poor) No mastery of conventions errors of spelling,
punctuations, capitalization, paragraph dominated
by handwriting illegible, or not enough to evaluate
Based on the table above, the researcher can be concluded the components to evaluate the students
writing quality there are: organization, vocabulary, language, and mechanic.
TABLE 6
SCORING WRITING OF PROCEDURE TEXT
Material Aspects Indicators Interval
Score
Writing Procedure 1. Content The students are able to build up 13-30
Text their ideas with suitable topic
2. Organization The students are able to express their 7-20
idea clearly.
3. Vocabulary The students are able to choose 7-20
suitable vocabulary and expression.
4. Language Use The students are able to compose a 5-25
sentence effectively.
5. Mechanic The students are able to master 2-5
TOTAL SCORE 100
