Gas 21 Digital Edition
Gas 21 Digital Edition
2021
COMBATING OPTIMISED
HEAT STABLE SYNGAS
SALTS PRODUCTION
OFFSHORE GAS CONTROLLING
PROCESSING GAS FIRED
REHEATERS
TO MAKE SURE YOU RECEIVE THE Q3 JUL, AUG SEP ISSUE OF PTQ
UPDATE YOUR REGISTER FOR REGISTER FOR ANY
SUBSCRIPTION A PRINT COPY A DIGITAL COPY QUESTIONS?
CLICK HERE PRINT ISSUE DIGITAL ISSUE CONTACT US
PTQ supplement
2021
www.digitalrefining.com
Clay Jones and Harnoor Kaur Optimized Gas Treating
Elmo Nasato Nasato Consulting
Cover
At 42 billion m3/y capacity, Gazprom’s Amur site near Russia’s border with China will be
one of the world’s largest gas processing plants
Photo: Gazprom
©2021. The entire content of this publication is protected by copyright full details of which are available from the publishers. All rights
reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means –
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
The opinions and views expressed by the authors in this publication are not necessarily those of the editor or publisher and while every
care has been taken in the preparation of all material included in Petroleum Technology Quarterly and its supplements the publisher
cannot be held responsible for any statements, opinions or views or for any inaccuracies.
L
Editor ast July, the European Commission (EC) announced its grand plan for
Chris Cunningham a zero carbon future for the European Union’s industrial base – power,
editor@petroleumtechnology.com heavy industry, and potentially the transport sector. The target is no-carbon
hydrogen production based on electrolysis of water while the energy to drive
Production Editor
a generation of electrolysers would be produced by renewable generators,
Rachel Storry
production@petroleumtechnology.com chiefly wind and solar. The schedule for this scheme envisages zero carbon
activity by 2050.
Graphics Sectors like chemicals, steel, aviation, and heavy road transport are resis-
Peter Harper tant to electrification. They need to burn fuel which, in the main, means
graphics@petroleumtechnology.com natural gas and refined petroleum liquids. The EC sees hydrogen as an obvi-
ous means to replace fossil fuels from the energy slate which in turn implies
Editorial
a gathering cloud over the natural gas industry.
tel +44 844 5888 773
fax +44 844 5888 667 Of course there are a few technical issues to resolve along the way to a
zero carbon Europe. For instance, there will need to be a huge expansion of
Business Development Director renewable power generation, and the means to store that power when gener-
Paul Mason ation at source is interrupted by weather conditions. Electrolysers which
sales@petroleumtechnology.com produce hydrogen on a scale that could keep industry ticking over are some
way from development, although the general view is that this could be
Advertising Sales Office
resolved by the end of the current decade.
tel +44 844 5888 771
fax +44 844 5888 662 There are also regulatory issues for the EC to resolve. It is an article of
faith for Brussels that gas producers and operators of transmission networks
Managing Director must not be one and the same. This is a central tenet of EU competition
Richard Watts policy that would need to be resolved to fit a very different production and
richard.watts@emap.com distribution system.
Despite the surrounding issues, three decades or so does not seem an
Circulation
unreasonable timeframe to achieve a version of a ‘carbon free’ future for
Fran Havard
circulation@petroleumtechnology.com many sectors of industry. Meanwhile, the apparent cloud over the natural
gas industry has a silver lining. Last summer, the EC conceded that a supply
EMAP, 10th Floor, Southern House, of green hydrogen – the kind produced by electrolysis – is unlikely to meet
Wellesley Grove, Croydon CR0 1XG its carbon-free ambitions. At the end of January this year, the European
tel +44 208 253 8695 Parliament, the elected branch of the EU’s executive, voted to support hydro-
gen derived from fossil fuel – blue hydrogen – as a bridge to zero carbon in
what would meanwhile be a lower carbon future.
Register to receive your regular copy of
PTQ at www.eptq.com/register Most hydrogen produced in the world is derived from natural gas, and
most of that is the product, along with carbon dioxide, of steam methane
PTQ (Petroleum Technology Quarterly) (ISSN reforming (SMR) which supplies hydrogen for refinery processes including
No: 1632-363X, USPS No: 014-781) is published
quarterly plus annual Catalysis edition by EMAP and cracking and desulphurisation. Blue hydrogen is the SMR kind, along with
is distributed in the US by SP/Asendia, 17B South some from autothermal reforming, with added carbon capture, storage and/
Middlesex Avenue, Monroe NJ 08831. Periodicals
postage paid at New Brunswick, NJ. Postmaster: or utilisation.
send address changes to PTQ (Petroleum Technology
Quarterly), 17B South Middlesex Avenue, Monroe NJ
The combined capacity of Europe’s fleet of SMR units is a long way from
08831. Back numbers available from the Publisher supplying even a minor portion of the level of hydrogen production targeted
at $30 per copy inc postage.
for 2050. By implication, there would be some compensation for the natural
gas industry’s proposed loss of markets, certainly for the foreseeable future.
And it is looking like boom time for the construction of new SMR units.
CHRIS CUNNINGHAM
Gas 2021 3
That’s smart.
That’s JZHC.
M
odified Claus based sul- gas). One part of this control strat- not identical. One of the primary
phur recovery units (SRUs) egy is determined by the amount of objectives for the TR is to create the
require successive cooling heat release needed to achieve the stoichiometric amount of SO2 that
and reheating of the process gas desired temperature rise in the pro- will allow the overall conversion of
stream as it passes through several cess stream: this temperature sets H2S to elemental sulphur to proceed
catalytic converter stages. Between the total amount of H2S combustion as far as possible through the Claus
each converter, the gas is cooled needed in the reheater. reaction (Equation 1). This objective
to condense and remove elemen- After the temperature require- causes the optimal H2S:SO2 ratio in
tal sulphur, then reheated to allow ment is set, there is still a degree of the TR to be close to 2:1 to match
production of additional elemen- freedom left in the control philoso- Claus reaction stoichiometry. In
tal sulphur in the next stage. Figure phy: should we feed the stoichio- contrast, the primary process objec-
1 shows a typical three-converter metrically required amount of acid tive in a fired reheater is simply to
configuration. gas such that it is all burned, should liberate enough heat of combustion
There are several common meth- we feed an excess amount of acid with a stable flame to achieve the
ods to reheat the stream including gas so that the combustion products required temperature increase in the
indirect steam heat, electric heat- contain a 2:1 ratio of H2S:SO2, or process stream.
ers, hot oil, gas/gas, and direct- does the best answer lie somewhere 3
fired reheaters. This article focuses between these two approaches? 2 𝐻𝐻$ 𝑆𝑆 + 𝑆𝑆𝑂𝑂$ ↔ 𝑆𝑆$ + 2 𝐻𝐻$ 𝑂𝑂 [1]
2
on direct-fired reheaters which Here we use a rate-based simulation
use some of the SRU’s acid gas to explore the process implications As per the TR flame control strat-
feed as fuel. Acid gas fired reheat- of this choice. Specifically, the ques- egy, in order to maintain reliable
ers (AGFR) are burners positioned tion to be answered is what effect AGFR operation, it is imperative
between the sulphur condenser does the reheater’s air-to-acid-gas to have a proper air control system
and the next converter bed. The hot ratio have on overall sulphur recov- that maintains flame stability to sat-
combustion gases from the burner ery and COS generation? isfy the required temperature con-
are mixed with the main process trol setpoint. The control scheme
stream in order to heat it to the Process description should be programmed to allow
desired converter temperature. The chemistry pertaining to AGFRs for independent feed flow meas-
Since these reheaters are burners, is generally similar to chemistry urement on all feed streams to the
they require a strategy to control in the SRU thermal reactor (TR), AGFR burner; this includes amine
the flow rate of air and fuel (acid although the process objectives are acid gas and, where applicable,
Amine
acid gas
Fired reheater-1 Fired reheater-2 Fired reheater-3
SWS
acid gas
Thermal reactor
Converter-1 Converter-2 Converter-3 To TGU
Oxygen
WHB
Molten
Air Condenser-1 Condenser-2 Condenser-3 Condenser-4 Sulphur
Air blower
Typical applications:
NGL Fractionation Plants, Deethanizers, Revamping towers with other types of high
Depropanizers, Debutanizers capacity trays
Olefins Plants; Depropanizers, Ethylene and Cross-flow option to maximize separation efficiency
Propylene Splitters for applications at low liquid rates
koch-glitsch.com
70
an appreciable amount of COS –
60
but not all – is destroyed in the sul-
50 phur converter beds. For example,
40 in this case study the three convert-
30 ers destroyed 92%, 45%, and 27% of
20 the COS fed to them. The amount of
10 COS sent to the TGTU here is small
relative to the most prevalent sul-
0
20 40 60 80 100 phur-bearing species (H2S, SO2, Sx).
% Stoichiometric air-to-acid gas ratio Despite its relatively small concen-
tration, the amount of COS sent to
Figure 4 COS sent to TGTU changes with burn strategy. Green lines represent cases the TGTU is important because it is
with no Claus reaction. Blue lines represent cases with Claus reaction proceeding to much harder to remove from the tail
equilibrium. Solid lines represent Test Run 1 with higher H2S concentration in amine acid gas – therefore it disproportionately
gas. Dashed lines represent Test Run 2 with lower H2S concentration contributes to emissions.
From your first inquiry through the delivery and commissioning of your equipment,
our experts are there every step of the way, ensuring the products being designed are
a perfect match for your process. Our turbocompressors are built to meet the rigorous
standards of the American Petroleum Institute in addition to your most stringent
technical requirements.
Find out how Atlas Copco Gas and Process can help you
handle the pressure of your downstream/refinery process
at atlascopco.com/downstream.
atlas.indd 1
21-ACC-0316_ad_PTQ March 2021 Print Ad Update_PTQ Print Ad_v3.indd 1 17/03/2021
3/10/21 11:20
10:31 AM
Stable vessel design for FLNG
Advances in floating liquefied natural gas production technology are becoming
an important factor in maintaining sustained growth of the natural gas industry
stable as the axisymmetric hull regardless of wind, waves and c
LARS ODESKAUG and SAEID MOKHATAB
Front Energy AS same time is suitable for Asian yards’ fabrication facilities. The r
shown in Figure 1.
A
s global demand for natu- technically innovative solution and
ral gas increases, the devel- potentially a commercially viable
opment of offshore floating means of exploiting remote
liquefied natural gas (FLNG) pro- offshore gas reserves.
duction technology is becoming It may also provide
an important factor in maintaining an economically pref-
sustained growth. Although off- erable option to flar-
shore LNG production has been the ing associated gas at oil
focus of research and development fields. FLNG technology
for decades, it is only in the recent may offer lower produc-
years that a few FLNG projects have tion cost, reduced time
progressed to detailed design, con- to first production, and fewer
struction and eventual operation. In environmental impacts than land
fact, some special challenges exist based alternatives. InFigure
addition, a Figure
1 Typical Cefront hull
1 Typical Cefront hull
in the design of an FLNG facility in potential advantage of a floating
the harsh offshore environment that facility is that it can be moved rel- small to midscale FLNG projects,
require special solutions. The key atively easily to an alternative
The hull is off- the liquefaction
spread moored with facility
threeisclusters
built on of
a mooring lines, o
aspect in developing a successful shore location as the original gas converted LNG carrier or on a pur-
FLNG project is the proper design has extremely
resources decline or economics favorable vessel
or pose-built motionthat characteristics
is sized more which are achiev
of the hull to provide: a seaworthy politics change. Thisrelationship as a conventional
allows the between length and LNG carrier.in combination with a b
breadth
and stable platform for production operator to save money on future When it comes to the design and
and product offloading as well as gas field developmentsstorage
or earn capacities ranging of
rev- construction froman150FLNG000facility,
m³ to 300 000 m³ (LNG
safe accommodation of the crew in enue by charging third parties to every element of a land based LNG
undergone extensive testing in the ocean test basin at Marintek
a remote, potentially hostile envi- process their gas through the FLNG facility needs to fit into a limited
ronment; and enough deck area to facility. While principally and compact
aimeditsatexceptional
verifying deckin space,
stability sea states whilst
up to significant w
accommodate the topsides process/ remote offshore gas reserves, FLNG maintaining safety and flexibility
utility units, required product stor- production technologybe canseen
alsofrom
be the example -- response
of production. amplitude operators (RA
Cargo containment
age and offloading systems, and considered for the development of andin Figure
pitch amplitudes product3 -- offloading
the Cefront systems
hull is stable compar
support facilities. nearshore gas fields with limited also need to withstand the effects
This article presents the Cefront carrier (VLCC)
infrastructure or as a combined liq- of based hull.and
the wind In summary,
waves at sea. it has
Somea number of adva
hull design, which provides a more uefaction and storage solution for of these technical challenges have
traditional ship-shaped hull, making it ideal for FLNG application
stable and economical platform for onshore gas. already been addressed, while
the offshore gas pre-treatment and Initial FLNG developments
• Low pitch wereand others such asreducing
roll motions, hull design and off-
sloshing and providing a st
liquefaction processes than conven- focused on building large scale loading technologies are still being
tional hulls. It is a further devel- facilities that can movetreatment
and process and developed
liquefaction andfacilities
enhanced.
opment of the axisymmetric hull large quantities of •LNG, typically 5
No need for turret and swivel
and is more fabrication ‘friendly’ million t/y and up, which require Cefront hull concept
and thereby less costly than earlier • High
huge capital investment. payload capacity
However, The Cefront hull design is based on
designs. The Cefront FLNG vessel the current trend is to mitigate pro- decades of experience with various
has a more efficient topsides layout
• LNG storage capacity of 225,000 m³, and additionally 45,000 m
ject risks by developing small to types of offshore vessels. The focus
than the axisymmetric units, and at mid-scale FLNG • projects, hasgirder
limiting hull
Insignificant been loads
to designanda deflections
hull that does regardless of loadi
the same time it has significantly less production capacities to 0.5-3 mil- not require a turret and is as stable
pitch and roll motions than a con- lion t/y. In large •scaleModules
FLNG pro- supported
as theby strong points
axisymmetric hullinregardless
main deck
ventional ship-shaped hull which jects, the liquefaction facilities are of wind, waves and current direc-
• Small deflections give simpler topside interface – sliding suppor
eliminates the need for expensive mounted on a barge-like structure tion, and at the same time is suitable
turret and swivel solutions. or a ship-shaped •vessel Well(depend- for Asian
known structural yards’ fabrication
arrangement based facili-
on “standard” scantlin
Floating liquefied natural gas ing on the location) with the LNG ties. The result is the Cefront hull
(FLNG) production technology is a Stiffened plate
stored in the hull• underneath. structure
In shown as for
in Figure 1. standard tankers
• Stiffener and stringer/ girder spacing as for standard tankers
www.digitalrefining.com • Not fatigue critical and hence high tensile steel
Gas 2021may
11 be used thr
• Easily scalable
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0
Peak period, Tp (s)
Sign. Roll/pitch amp. / Hs (deg/m)
Figure 5 Typical membrane CCS internal view (Courtesy of GTT) Figure 6 LNT A-Box CCS (Courtesy of LNT Marine)
Figure 4 Typical
and deck membrane
dimensions CCS internal
are typically Figure 6view
Figure
(Courtesy
shows
5 LNT
of GTT)
the LNT A-Box
A-Box CCS (Courtesy of LNT Marine)
sys- leads, chain stoppers, and winches
155 m length and 125 m breadth. tem from LNT Marine. It consists to support the mooring lines.
The hull is arranged with seven of independent IMO tanks Type Typical maximum tension in each
LNG tanks
Several with a typical
self-supported total A supported
tank containment Mooring
systemsbyarelaminated
availablecom- mooring but
in the market, linefewis 450 tonnes and the
have
capacity of 225 000 m³ and four pressed wood blocks,The withvessel
the insu- chain is
will beconsists typically
mooredof by a spreadwith
90 mm a min-system in an orie
mooring
been built. Figure
condensate/LPG 5 shows
tanks with athe LNTlation
total A-Boxattached
system to from
theLNT
innerMarine.
hull Itimum breaking load (MBL) of 900
capacity of 45 IMO
independent 000 m³. Ballast
tanks Typetanks and acting
A supported by as typically
a secondary
laminated heads
barrier
compressed into
in wood the
tonnes. prevailing
blocks, weather conditions. The vessel
with the
are arranged in double side and in accordance with International Gas
insulation attached three-point mooring system, typically with 12 mooring lines (3 clus
double bottom to thetoInternational
the inner hull Code
and acting as secondary
(IGC) 4.6. barrier in Offloading
accordance with
Convention for the Prevention of
International Gas Code (IGC) 4.6. degree spread). Offloading
Each mooring is line
side-by-side with a lower chain
has an anchor,
Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Mooring LNG arms by FMC, SVT, or similar.
damage point. The double bottom The vessel will be element moored and by aan upper
There arechainfiveelement and
identical 16”buoyancy
arms, elements as r
inside this is void. Number of bal- spread mooring system in an ori-
The FLNG fourhave
unit will LNG, and onechain
fairleads, vapour return and winches to
stoppers
last tanks is 14. The ballast and con- entation where the bow typically (see Figure 7). The total capacity of
densate tanks extend up to the main heads into the prevailing Typicalweather
maximum thetension
system in each
is 12 mooring
000-14 line is 450 tonnes and
000 m3/h.
deck while the LNG tanks extend conditions. The vessel with ais minimum
spread breaking load (MBL) of 900 tonnes.
up to the process deck. moored with a three-point mooring Topside LNG production
The geometry of the holds in system, typically with 12 mooring The topside LNG production facili-
which the LNG containment sys- lines (three clusters of 3 x 4 in a 120 ties shown in Figure 8 comprise the
Offloading
tem will be installed is shown in degree spread). Each mooring line main gas pretreatment and lique-
Figure 4. The hold space will have has an anchor, a lower chain ele-
Offloading faction units.
is side-by-side withTheLNGrequired
arms gas pre- SVT or similar
by FMC,
a controlled atmosphere in order to ment, a polyester element and an treatment steps depend strongly on
reduce/eliminate the risk of fire and upper chain element,arms, four LNG and
and buoyancy one vapour
the level of feed return (see Figure 6). The total c
gas components.
explosion, and also to avoid con- elements as required.000 – 14 000 m3For /h. example, the low levels of sul-
densation and a humid atmosphere. The FLNG unit will have fair- phur compounds in the feed gas to
UTILITY DECK
(AFT): SMR
CARGO
MACHINERY
UTILITY DECK:
FW Pumps
in a smaller footprint and lighter
MR storage and TRAIN 1 EFG/BOG/ weight, thereby lowering associ-
pumps FUEL CHEM
15 m
ated capital costs. The dual mixed
UTILITY
refrigerant (DMR) cycles, offering
COOLING WATER / SW
HEAT EXCHANGE
HHC BLOCK
135 m
SMR
TRAIN 2
REMOVAL
& FRAC.
H higher efficiency, are optimal solu-
PIG receiver, HIPPS
DE-
HYDRATION
tions for single, larger train FLNG
Inlet riser
at this side
(main deck)
ABSORBENT POWER applications. Larger trains can
(assumed) SMR LAYDOWN GEN
Prevailing wind offer economies of scale (thereby
TRAIN 3
reducing capital expenditure) and
(assumed)
INLET &
AGRU
a reduced footprint, but less oper-
Note should be made that fuel gas for the liquefactionUTILITY system
DECK: drivers and
FW Pumps
electrical
ational power and flexibil-
redundancy
165 m ity. In this case, the choices around
generation is generated UTILITY DECK: as a mixture of lean end flash gas (EFG), natural boil-off gas (BOG)
equipment will be also limited with
GT air cooling refrigeration UTILITY DECK:
from the LNG storage tanks, with supplemental fuel gas from the treatedlonger
packages SW pumping and treat.
feed gas.delivery
Excess periods, which
could potentially affect economies
BOG/EFG as well as vapour return during LNG transfer is recompressed of for re-liquefaction.
scale. 1
A single, larger train is
Figure 8 Topsides layout for Cefront vessel with LNG production capacity of 3 million t/y often preferred by owners and oper-
ators; however, the current trend is
Application
the FLNG facility of the mean Cefront thathull onlyconcept The nitrogen expander cycle to use multiple smaller trains which
CO removal is required in the acid offers lower efficiency than other have the following features:2
As a2result of attractive gas prices in the US, there are numerous LNG export projects on the
gas removal unit (AGRU). technology options, but it can be • Lower economy of scale partially
GulfAscoast;
can bea seen few are in Figurealready 8, allintheoperation, used for and small-scale
several more FLNGare produc- offset by increased
under construction competition as
or in the
process units have been configured tion because of its simplicity and more suppliers become available
planning
as singlestages.
trains except Common to all of them
the liquefac- ease isof that the export
sourcing the non-fl shipping
ammable route• to Asian markets
Operational is
flexibility (easier
tion unit which is split into three refrigerant
either around the Cape of Good Hope or through the extended Panama Canal. Both routes from onboard nitrogen start-up and improved turndown)
separate trains utilising a single generators. The absence of hydro- • Wider selection of fabrication
are timerefrigerant
mixed consuming (SMR) andcycle. expensive. Developers carbon refrigerant are therefore
inventory considering
also yards exporting LNG
fromNote
North shouldAmericabe made to that
the selection
Asian markets makesfrom the the
nitrogen
Pacific expander
coast ofpro- North•America.
ShutdownAtofleastone train does not
of the liquefaction technology for off- cess safer than the mixed refriger- stop production from other trains
one developer
shore FLNG facilities is planning will be to aggregate
influ- ant natural gas in the
(MR) processes. AsPermian
production Basin• in West maintenance
Annual Texas and can be stag-
enced by the needs of the owner. capacities move into the mid-scale gered by train
send it through existing pipelines to the Pacific coast of Mexico. About 10 – 15 km off the
Various process features including and large scale ranges, there is • Incremental capacity build-up for
the there
coast production will becapacity,
an FLNGthermal vessel, and a preference
the developer towards has MR already cycles off-takers
chosen (alignment
the Cefront hull with prevail-
efficiency, equipment count, refrig- because they are more efficient ing LNG market conditions)
aserant
the type,
basisreliability,
for the developmentspecific capital(see Figure
than nitrogen8). Theexpanderunit will haveand
cycles an export
• Phasedcapacity of 3
approach to align
investment, simplicity of operations, have lower
million t/y, and there are significant savings related to favourable gas prices in the Permian unit capital and oper- upstream development and feed gas
offshore suitability, availability, and ating costs at larger LNG capaci- supply.
(Waha
impacthub), of vesseluse motion
of the Cefront and safety hull, ties.and the shorterMR
However, distance
cycles to may Asianbe markets.
Note should be made that fuel gas
must be considered. affected by sea motions due to the for the liquefaction system drivers
and electrical power generation is
generated as a mixture of lean end
flash gas (EFG), natural boil-off gas
(BOG) from the LNG storage tanks,
with supplemental fuel gas from the
treated feed gas. Excess BOG/EFG
as well as vapour return during
LNG transfer is recompressed for
re-liquefaction.
Conclusion
The Cefront FLNG vessel is a spread moored floating unit with a unique combination of in-
hull storage capacity, high deck weight capacity and favourable motion characteristics. The
gas front.indd 4 17/03/2021 12:38
few are already in operation, and career with Brown & Root in 1977, and has held globally as a process technology expert in the
several more are under construction senior management positions in oil service and fields of natural gas processing and LNG. He
or in the planning stages. Common technology companies since 1994, including has been actively involved in different aspects
to all of them is that the export Managing Director of Hitec Marine and CEO of several large-scale gas processing and LNG
projects for over 20 years, and has contributed
shipping route to Asian markets of TORP LNG. He has held several board
positions, has given numerous presentations to the understanding of gas processing & LNG
is either around the Cape of Good
at international energy conferences and has knowledge, practices, and technologies through
Hope or through the extended 300 technical papers and four reference books
written many articles related to innovation
Panama Canal. Both routes are in the oil and gas industry. He is a Norwegian (published by Elsevier in the US). He has
time consuming and expensive. citizen and has a degree in mechanical held technical advisory positions for leading
Developers are therefore consid- engineering from Heriot-Watt University, professional journals, societies and conferences
ering exporting LNG from North Edinburgh, Scotland. in the field of gas processing, and has received
America to the Asian markets from a number of international awards and medals
the Pacific coast of North America. Saeid Mokhatab is a senior LNG advisor of in recognition of his outstanding work in the
At least one developer is planning Front Energy AS in Norway. He is recognised natural gas industry.
to aggregate natural gas in the
Permian Basin in West Texas and
send it through existing pipelines to
the Pacific coast of Mexico. About
10-15 km off the coast there will be
an FLNG vessel, and the developer
Your
has already chosen the Cefront hull
as the basis for the development
(see Figure 9). The unit will have
an export capacity of 3 million t/y,
efficiency
and there are significant savings
related to favourable gas prices in
the Permian (Waha hub), use of the
Cefront hull, and the shorter dis-
rises
tance to Asian markets.
Conclusion
The Cefront FLNG vessel is a
spread moored floating unit with
a unique combination of in-hull
storage capacity, high deck weight
capacity, and favourable motion
characteristics. The vessel’s propri-
etary design eliminates the need
for a turret, and thereby the cost is
reduced significantly. The Cefront
design can be tailored to a wide
range of applications and is ideally
suited for FLNG as it provides a sta-
ble platform for the pretreatment
and liquefaction plants, and slosh-
ing is not an issue with the vessel’s Oil & Gas
superior motion characteristics. solutions expertise
This article is based on a presentation to
the GPA Europe Spring Conference held in
Innovative decarbonizing systems
Shell Technology Center, Amsterdam, the
Satisfying the world’s demand for more
Netherlands, May 15-17, 2019.
energy and lower carbon emissions
References requires imaginative solutions that are
1 Mokhatab S, Liquefaction Technology both sustainable and profitable. Make
Selection for Offshore FLNG Projects, PTQ, Q4, use of our expertise in resource-efficient,
107-112, 2018. low environmental impact technologies
2 Talib J H, Private Communication, Floating and services for the upstream, midstream
Technology Applications, Black & Veatch, USA, and downstream sectors.
Aug 2018.
www.man-es.com
Lars Odeskaug is the Founder and CEO of
Front Energy AS in Norway. He started his
Managing all the processes in a sulfur recovery unit (SRU) is arduous work—demanding skill, concentration,
and dedication through every shift. Fortunately, the reliability, accuracy, robust design, and operating
ease of AMETEK analyzers can make that tough work a little easier. AMETEK engineers have been
designing industry-standard SRU analyzers for decades, and that shows in the products’ accuracy,
reliability, and longevity.
Because we make analyzers for every part of the process—from acid-feed gas to tail gas to
emissions, including the gas treating unit, sulfur storage (pit) gas, and hot/wet stack gas—you
get the convenience of one source for unparalleled engineering and support for all your
analyzers, while your operators benefit from consistent interfaces and operating procedures.
For decades, we’ve been dedicated to making your SRU operation the most efficient it
can be for the long term. Learn more at www.ametekpi.com/SRU.
F
ormation of heat stable salts
(HSS) is a common issue in O
amine units and is a major fac- CO2 MEA
tor in operating costs. Accumulation HO–CH2–CH2–NH2 HN O HO–CH2–CH2–NH–CO–NH–CH2–CH2–OH
of HSS can cause more energy MEA MEA/MEA urea or MEA/Other amine urea
consumption for regeneration; O
Oxazolidone
0
Case history 3
1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118 127 136 145 154 163 172 181 190 199 208 217 226 235 244 253 262 The MEA unit of a lube refinery
Hours had a history of HSS build-up.
In particular, fouling built up in
Figure 3 Delta T of a lean/rich exchanger before and after ITW Online Cleaning the water-oil separator and in the
Hiejector separator. The water-oil
tractor personnel. The refinery’s ITW’s online/in-situ cleaning and separator had a strong polymer
management also decided to clean decontamination was completed in deposit while the Hiejector sep-
the regenerator simultaneously less than 24 hours, with no waste arator had a typical HSS deposit
with the lean/rich exchanger to generated and significantly faster which was packing almost all of the
improve unit efficiency following than mechanical cleaning. demister. ITW applied its cleaning
restart. Upon resuming production, technologies during the turnaround.
Decontamination was performed in
the aqueous phase because of the
equipment’s low design tempera-
ture, and was completed in about 12
hours.
Figure 6 shows Hiejector demister
fouling while Figure 7 shows the
dissolved fouling.
Conclusion
Contamination costs are more
difficult to quantify than energy
costs or the costs of amine loss.
Figure 4 Gummy fouling at a DEA unit Figure 5 Gummy fouling dissolved by ITW However, if contaminant levels
processing delayed coker overhead gases treatment are allowed to build up and cause
Process Gas
Compressor inside
Burckhardt Compression offers a complete portfolio of Process Gas Compressors ranging from bare shaft
compressors to turnkey solutions. Our dedicated refinery expert team is able to give excellent FEED engineering
support and offers outstanding project management and engineering expertise. In addition, we offer
comprehensive in-house electrical engineering services, including instrumentation, control & monitoring.
Learn more: burckhardtcompression.com/refinery
bc_ad_Refinery_216x303_en_210217.indd
burchardt.indd 1 1 17.02.2021 15:16:18
12/03/2021 12:52
The case for blue hydrogen
An analysis of the costs and merits of grey, blue, and green hydrogen
H
ydrogen is essential in petro- all the way to green (produced from ilarly to grey hydrogen, from fos-
leum refining. It enables the renewable sources). Table 1 presents sil fuels or from non-renewable
production of clean burning, a summary of the three most com- energy sources, but with a lower
low sulphur fuels, the hydrotreating mon types (colours) of hydrogen. carbon intensity. Carbon emissions
of heavy feedstocks to yield more are lowered by capturing, storing
desirable products, and the hydro- Grey, blue, and green hydrogen and/or sequestering a portion of
genation of vegetable and animal Grey hydrogen is mainly produced the total CO2 produced in the pro-
fats for the production of green fuels, by reforming of fossil fuels such as cess. Commercial processes can
among other uses. In the petrochem- natural gas, LPG, or naphtha via capture up to about 90% of the CO2
ical industry, hydrogen is the back- steam methane reforming (SMR); it produced. The cost of production
bone of reactions involved in the accounts for about 95% of the hydro- is mainly influenced by the cost of
production of multiple products of gen gas that is produced worldwide feedstock, utilities, the incremental
common use that are derived from today. The SMR process generates cost of CO2 handling (recovery, com-
syngas or from hydrogen itself. carbon dioxide (CO2) as co-product, pression, storage, transport via pipe-
Although hydrogen is a colour- a greenhouse gas that is vented to lines, sequestration), and the carbon
less and (odourless) gas, nowadays atmosphere. Grey hydrogen has one credits that often subsidise the over-
it is commonly labelled with a col- of the lowest overall (fixed and var- all cost of blue hydrogen. Carbon
our associated with the way it is iable) costs of production; it requires credits vary with geography, region,
produced and the feedstock and the less equipment and a smaller foot- politics, lobbying, and other factors.
emissions produced in its manufac- print. Nevertheless, its acceptance is Green hydrogen is produced
turing, among other considerations. coming under pressure for environ- using renewable energy. It meets the
The spectrum of colours goes from mental reasons. lowest carbon threshold when clean
black (hydrogen produced from coal) Blue hydrogen is produced sim- energy sources are used to separate
Table 1
Figure 1 Steam reformer based hydrogen plant (with CO2 removal blocks)
hydrogen from other compounds molecule (electrolysis), and the elec- Grey and blue hydrogen production
such as water molecules. Clean tricity comes from a power plant Figure 1 shows a typical block dia-
sources of energy include wind, fed by fossil fuels (where carbon gram for a hydrogen production
solar energy, hydropower, and geo- emissions are produced), then the process using a steam reformer with
thermal. Different factors affect the hydrogen generated via this process natural gas as feed and a pressure
cost of green hydrogen. The first one is not green. swing adsorption (PSA) unit.
is the cost of the process, for exam- There have been numerous
ple electrolysis where hydrogen is successful government-backed Feed pretreatment and reforming
produced from water using renew- projects in recent years aimed at fos- section
able energy. The cost of generating tering the use of clean hydrogen. The Hydrocarbon feedstock – normally
green energy has fallen significantly International Energy Agency has natural gas – enters the plant typ-
in the past decade. Green hydrogen identified five smart policy actions ically at about 350 psig and is pre-
presents a number of challenges in that are needed.1 1. Establish long heated to about 750°F (400°C).
term of 24/7 availability of green term signals to foster investor con- Other hydrocarbons such as LPG or
energies for its production, over- fidence; 2. Stimulate commercial naphtha, either from fossil fuels or
all production cost, and the limited demand for hydrogen in multiple renewable sources, can also be used
volume that can be produced. Wind applications; 3. Help mitigate salient as a feedstock, in which case a pre-
and/or solar energy can be used to risks, such as value chain complex- reformer is required. Steam as a reac-
produce green hydrogen, which ity; 4. Promote R&D and knowledge tant for the (endothermic) reforming
can be temporarily stored during sharing; and 5. Harmonise standards reaction is added at a steam/car-
periods when there is low power and remove barriers. bon ratio of about three. This mixed
demand, or can be repurposed. The number of countries with steam/hydrocarbon feed is heated to
A more recent addition to the spec- polices that directly support invest- about 950°F (510°C) prior to entering
trum of colours is turquoise hydro- ment in hydrogen technologies is the reformer tubes. A syngas mixture
gen, produced by pyrolysis, which increasing, with a rising focus on of hydrogen, CO, CO2, unreacted
breaks down methane into hydro- existing and new applications and CH4, and steam exits the reformer’s
gen and solid carbon. However, tur- technologies, but with support for catalyst-filled tubes at about 1550°F
quoise hydrogen is likely to be no new applications such as road trans- (840°C).
more carbon-free than the blue vari- port as well. Governments have a
ety in view of emissions from the critical role to play and are work- Syngas cooling and waste heat
required process heat. ing with an increasingly strong and recovery section
There can often be a misconcep- diverse stakeholder community to The syngas is cooled in a waste heat
tion about the production of true address key challenges, including boiler to about 650°F (340°C) prior to
green hydrogen. The hydrogen pro- high costs, policy and technology entering the high temperature shift
duced is green only if the process uncertainty, value chain complexity (HTS) reactor. The HTS exit syn-
uses clean green electricity with and infrastructure requirements, reg- gas is further cooled to about 100°F
zero carbon emissions. If one needs ulations and standards, and public (38°C) in a series of heat exchang-
to supply electricity to split a water acceptance. ers prior to entering the PSA unit,
H2-Re
ady!
TRI-CON
SERIES FOR H2
APPLICATIONS
Figure 3 Amine scrubbing unit for CO2 removal from flue gas
Low pressure steam is used in the tional challenges over that from syn- orange shaded items in Figure 3. One
stripper reboiler for safety in limit- gas, which makes the unit’s design main advantage is that the process
ing the bottom amine temperature more complex and more expensive: removes CO2 from flue gas without
below amine solvent degradation (a) Since the gas is at atmospheric disturbing the upstream pressure or
limit. The CO2 overhead is about pressure, there is a need for com- operation of the SMR process.
99% pure on a dry basis (2-9 psig) pression before processing further. Most amine systems cannot
which is sent for drying/compres- Low pressure leads to larger equip- operate in a flue gas environ-
sion. Table 2 is a key stream sum- ment size. ment, because the amine will
mary for a typical design. Syngas (b) Low CO2 concentration and low rapidly degrade in the presence
containing about 16% CO2 at 360 psig pressure leads to low partial pres- of oxygen. This is prevented by
is cleaned to a 0.1% level. Solvent sure of CO2, which requires high sol- addition of a suitable inhibitor to
rates and composition can clean the vent circulation rates. the amine solution. This inhibi-
stream down to 10-30 volppm CO2 if (c) Presence of oxygen and water tor protects the equipment against
required. The CO2 stripper bottoms leads to equipment corrosion, corrosion and permits the use of con-
temperature is dictated by the max- requiring the need to add corrosion ventional materials of construction,
imum temperature limit for amine inhibitors. mostly carbon steel.
degradation. This temperature is a (d) SOx present reacts with amines In order to avoid the formation of
function of stripper operating pres- irreversibly to produce corrosive heat stable salts in the amine solu-
sure at bottoms. Thus an optimum salts. tion, SOx, NOx (specifically NO2
operating pressure is chosen to (e) Possible presence of fly ash, par- and N2O4) and particulates must
achieve as high as possible a stripper ticulates, soot will cause foaming in be reduced to an acceptable level
pressure. The temperature limit also amine systems. upstream of the absorber.
requires only low pressure steam to (f) Presence of NOx causes corrosion These added requirements make
be used in the reboiler to limit tem- of equipment and amine degradation. the process more elaborate, espe-
peratures. Many designs use syngas (g) Flue gas pretreatment, direct cially the front end addressing flue
at 300-350°F (150-175°C) to supply contact pre-cooler/compression sys- gas contaminants (contact cooler,
part of the reboiler heat duty for tems are large and expensive. clean-up beds), corrosion due to SOx,
energy efficiency. Raw CO2 product (h) Typical energy requirement CO2 and moisture (drying pre-com-
is saturated with water vapour (4-8 for the flue gas CO2 system is about pression), low pressure requiring a
mol%), so CO2 drying will be neces- 60 000-80 000 Btu/lb-mole CO2 recov- blower, and so on. Also, large flue
sary prior to compression. ered, compared to 20 000 to 40 000 gas volumes and lower CO2 partial
Btu/lb-mole CO2 required for syn- pressure require large amine solvent
CO2 recovery from flue gas gas CO2 systems. This is due to the circulation rates and large equip-
Figure 3 is a block diagram of a typ- additional clean-up required, low ment. Materials of construction need
ical system for CO2 removal from pressure operation, and associated to address corrosion potential.
reformer furnace flue gas. The basic higher solvent circulation rates for All of these factors make low pres-
principles are the same as for recov- the flue gas system. sure flue gas CO2 recovery much
ery of CO2 from a high pressure syn- Additional equipment required more expensive compared to the
gas stream, however CO2 recovery for the flue gas system, as compared high pressure syngas option. At
from flue gas poses several addi- to the syngas system, is shown as times, for cost savings or to limit
Table 4
EXPERIENCE!
4 Lockett M J, Distillation Tray Fundamentals, Cambridge University
emissions green hydrogen. Compared to grey hydrogen,
Press, Cambridge, 1986.
blue hydrogen requires a higher capital and variable cost
for CO
Lowell
2
recovery
Pless wasandthe sequestration.
Business Development Manager – Distillation The know-how of more than 60 years empowers Böhmer
The emissions
Applications withfrom incremental
Tracerco, use of Texas,
located in Pasadena, energy (pri-
and is now
to build Ball Valves that help customers to realize their
projects efficiently & successfully for the long term.
marily power) for
a consultant required for compression,
the company. separation,
He has been applying and
radioisotope
sequestration CO2 must
techniques inofprocess also be accounted
troubleshooting for. Carbon
for over 30 years, originally
credits,
with availability
Tru-Tec Services of (acquired
sequestration sites,inand
by Tracerco 2006)processing
and started 1/8 TO OIL, GAS, STEAM, CHEMICALS UP TO
56 INCH & SPECIAL APPLICATIONS 800 BAR
coststheare essential
tower scanningfor the deployment
service of blueEurope
for Tru-Tec in Western hydrogen.
and the
Green hydrogen must use renewable sources to produce
Middle East. He holds a BS degree in chemical engineering from the
true zero emissions in the production process; this repre-
University of Texas at Austin, is a registered Professional Engineer
in the State of Texas, participates on the Design and Practices
sents challenges in terms of cost and scale of production
committee for Fractionation Research (FRI), and is a member of the
among other factors.
American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Governments have a critical role to play in addressing
key challenges. Blue and green hydrogen can be profitable
André Perschmann is an equipment process design expert with Linde
with carbon credits.
Engineering for eight years. He designs all types of columns and
References
separators for petrochemical, natural gas, hydrogen, and synthesis gas
1 Theplants.
FutureHeof isHydrogen, report
also involved in prepared
root causebyanalysis,
the IEAtroubleshooting,
for the G20, Japan and
(Jun 2019).
revamp activities. He holds a diploma degree in bioprocess engineering
2 Marquez
from theM,Technical
Bumgarner B, Optimum
University use of H2 in theGermany.
of Braunschweig, production of drop-
in green fuels, 2020 AFPM Summit, www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/
conference-news/2020/08/2020-afpm-summit-optimum-use-of-h2-in-
David Bruder is a process and operation expert for petrochemical
the-production-of-drop-in-green-fuels
plants with Linde Engineering, planning, simulating, and optimising
3 Methodology for the calculation of GHG emissions from Biofuels and
all relevant processes within the Linde petrochemical portfolio with
Bioliquids, Doc. 2BS-PRO-03, www.2bsvs.org/documents/public/2BSvs_
a focus on steam cracker separation technology. He is involved in
PRO_03_Methodologie_de_Calcul_des_GES__F__v1.pdf
brownfield/revamp projects such as capacity increase, optimisation,
Tarunlife
Vakil is Director
cycle, energy, or oftroubleshooting
Hydrogen Technology
existingforplants,
NipponandSanso
in theHolding
analysis
Corporation’s
of processUS andsubsidiary
operationMatheson. He has more than
performance/optimisation 45 years
of running of
plants.
experience in engineering and industrial gases and holds a BS degree in
chemical engineering
Thomas Walter fromheads
The Indian
the Institute of Technology,
Equipment ProcessBombay,
Designand&
a MSComputational
degree in chemical engineering
Mechanics from Pennsylvania
department State University.
of Linde Engineering where
Email: tvakil@mathesongas.com
his group is responsible for the process design of static equipment for
Marco Márquez is Global Director of Hydrogen Business Development
petrochemical, natural gas, air separation, and hydrogen/synthesis gas
– Refining with Matheson. He has more than 30 years of combined
plants. He holds a master’s degree in process engineering from the
experience in the oil industry and with industrial gas companies and
holdsTechnical
MSc andUniversity, Dresden,engineering
PhD in chemical Germany. from North Carolina State
University. Email: mamarquez@mathesongas.com www.boehmer.de
www.digitalrefining.com
www.digitalrefining.com
@gastechevent
Gastech is set to be the most impactful Energy event of 2021 to drive the global Energy transition agenda.
80% of the exhibition sold out. Secure your prime position today and make
2021 a strong success!
Join the above exhibitors so your company is one of the key players for the Energy industry!
T: +44 (0)203 615 5916 E: sales@gastechevent.com
I
ncreasingly, plant operators are the fuel to produce unwanted emis- More recently, tunable diode laser
becoming highly sensitive to their sions such as oxides of nitrogen (TDL) technology has been intro-
contribution towards greenhouse (NOx) and sulphur (SOx). Accurate duced for this application, pro-
gas emissions. This awareness has gas analysis of oxygen and combus- viding even faster measurement,
been driven by ever more strin- tibles such as carbon monoxide (CO) particularly for carbon monoxide. It
gent environmental regulations has provided a way to better balance also gives an average measurement
and international action to reduce the air-to-fuel ratio and control the across the measurement path, rather
the impact on climate, such as the combustion reaction. than the result at a single point.
2016 Paris Agreement. To support Controlling combustion produces However, since TDL sensing is
their efforts to reduce emissions and a number of benefits, particularly highly specific to the gas being meas-
operate in an ecologically respon- for plants looking to meet environ- ured, separate analysers are required
sible way, many plants are looking mental standards requirements. Fuel for O2 and CO.
towards gas analysis systems to pro- consumption is reduced, resulting Servomex has the Servotough
vide the solution. in fewer emissions, a reduction in Laser 3 Plus Combustion TDL
A combination of solutions for NOx, SOxgas
Monitoring and CO, and a decrease in analyser for this application, and this
emissions
combustion efficiency, gas clean-up, the greenhouse
Analysis gas carbon
of gases supports initiatives incan
cleaner airdioxide be confiprocessing
hydrocarbon gured to measure either
and emissions monitoring sup- (CO ).
Servomex
2 author TBA O 2
or CO. It can also be configured
ports plants in their goals, not only Zirconia based sensing technology for a joint measurement of CO and
ensuring that air remains clean, but is long established as a solution for CH4, providing a rapid-response
Increasingly, plant operators are becoming highly sensitive to their contribution towards
optimising processes for reduced O2 monitoring in combustion, and measurement for safety in natural
greenhouse gas emissions. This awareness has been driven by ever-more-stringent
fuel consumption and higher yields delivers reliable, accurate results gas fired heaters and boilers.
in hydrocarbon processing (see environmental
with a fastregulations,
responseandtointernational
changing action toAdditionally,
reduce the impactiton isclimate, such as the
important to
Figure 1). conditions. It has the advantage that note that gas analysis is used in
2016 Paris Agreement. To support their efforts to reduce emissions and operate in an
a combustibles
ecologically sensor
responsible way,can
manybe added
plants many
are looking applications
towards gas analysistosystems
support to greater
provide
Effective combustion control easily,
the and at modest cost, to pro- process efficiency. The more efficient
solution.
Combustion is an integral part of vide
A an all-in-one
combination combustion
of solutions for combustioncon- thegasprocess
efficiency, clean-up, reaction
and emissionsis, monitoring
the fewer
many hydrocarbon processing appli- trol solution, such as in Servomex’s harmful emissions are likely
supports plants in their goals, not only ensuring that air remains clean, but optimising processes to be
cations, with no realistic alternatives Servotough FluegasExact 2700 com- generated, so this also
for reduced fuel consumption and higher yields in hydrocarbon processing (see Figure 1).
plays its part
available to create the extremely bustion analyser. in cleaner air.
high temperatures required. The
combustion reaction mixes fuel with
oxygen (from air) in a fired heater,
delivering heat energy that can be
transferred elsewhere in the pro-
cess. This reaction typically requires
a significant amount of fuel, creates
potential safety hazards, and gener-
ates harmful emissions.
The most efficient reaction is one
where the ratio between air and fuel
is optimised. Prior to the develop-
ment of gas analyser technology,
fired heaters were typically run in
high excess air conditions. This was
inefficient and increased the level of
fuel consumption, but avoided the
creation of unsafe conditions that
could lead to an explosion.
An excess of oxygen (O2) also com- Effectivemonitoring
Figure 11 Effective
Figure monitoringof of gases
gases reduces
reduces emissions
emissions andand operating
operating costs
costs in
in hydrocarbon
bines with nitrogen and sulphur in hydrocarbon processing
processing
Figure 2 Laser 3 Plus TDL analyser in ammonia slip applications Flue gas desulphurisation
The purpose of a flue gas desulphur-
For example, one of the largest air SpectraExact 2500 is suited to off-gas isation (FGD) system is to remove
emissions sources in a refinery is the CO and CO2 measurements. sulphur compounds (SOx, princi-
fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit, pally SO2) from exhaust gases. It is
which requires multiple gas meas- Cleaning process gases a process usually utilised by fossil
urements across the process. The second phase of Servomex’s fuelled power plants and operators
In a typical FCC unit, a process clean air strategy is to tackle gas in other SOx-emitting processes.
control oxygen measurement is cleaning, that is the removal of A method commonly applied
required in the regenerator off-gas, harmful substances from process sees the flue gas sprayed with a wet
where low O2 will cause incomplete gases that might otherwise be emit- slurry of lime, which reacts with
combustion (and, therefore, removal) ted by the plant. SOx and scrubs up to 95% of the SO2
of the catalyst coke and excess O2 can Typical applications within this content from the gas. Gas analys-
reduce catalyst life. area include ammonia slip treatment ers measure the SO2 content after
Measurement of CO and CO2 in and flue gas desulphurisation. treatment to ensure any remaining
the same off-gas helps calculate cat- sulphur compounds fall within regu-
alyst coke formation, enabling cat- Ammonia slip latory limits.
alyst regeneration efficiency to be To suppress the harmful emissions Since gases containing SOx can
determined. Excess O2 and CO levels of NOx from combustion, ammo- be corrosive, and treatment tem-
require monitoring in the regener- nia or urea is used, either in a SCR peratures are usually kept high to
ator flue gas, while ammonia slip is or selective non-catalytic reduc- prevent moisture content from dam-
measured at the selective catalytic tion (SNCR) process. Both methods aging equipment, gas analysis faces
reduction (SCR) outlet to control the require accurate ammonia dosing a challenge. Non-contact, photomet-
NOx removal process. to reduce NOx levels. If insufficient ric sensing technology provides the
Each point of this process ben- NH3 is used, then NOx emissions most effective and accurate measure-
efits from the application of an are not sufficiently suppressed, ment for SO2 in this application.
appropriate technology: the off-gas while too much NH3 can lead to the Servomex’s Servopro 4900
measurements for O2 and NH3 slip eventual formation of ammonium Multigas uses infrared gas filter cor-
benefit from the use of TDL open- bisulphate. relation (GFx) technology to meas-
path measurements which reduce Ammonium bisulphate is a white ure SO2 in this application. This
issues with catalyst particulates powder that can plug the catalyst in sensing method allows real-time
experienced by in-situ or simple SCR processes, causing equipment measurements accurate to very low
extractive systems. damage and reducing the value of levels, without interference from
Close-coupled extractive systems, the fly ash by-product, so it is vital background gases.
such as the FluegasExact 2700, are that plants manage NOx removal This technology can also support
reliable and cost-effective for making processes efficiently, controlling the sulphur recovery units (SRU) which
O2 and combustibles (COe) flue gas level of ammonia slip to 2-3 ppm recover sulphur from streams con-
measurements, while the Servotough ammonia. taining H2S.
C
arbon dioxide (CO2) removal
is one of the most common
activities that producers and
users of synthetic gas (syngas) need
to perform to obtain suitable feed
for downstream processes. By uti-
lising advanced separation column
internals, including the latest col-
umn packings, businesses can max-
imise efficiency, throughput, and
CO2 capture while also supporting
environmental goals.
Syngas is a key product and ingre-
dient for a wide range of applica-
tions within the manufacturing and
processing sectors, including petro-
chemical and ammonia production.
However, the levels of CO2 in this
mixture may need to be adjusted and
businesses often process this gas in
order to reduce CO2 concentrations.
In a number of industrial appli-
cations, it is more advantageous to Figure 1 Shell Schoepentoeter
adjust the ratio of hydrogen versus
carbon in syngas via shift reactions inlets release the gas from a singu- feed, performing a first stage separa-
to utilise pure hydrogen in their lar opening and hardly separate tion of liquid from the vapour, and
processes. In some other cases, CO2 the vapour and liquid phases using achieving an even vapour distribu-
is removed from syngas to increase gravitational forces only. Businesses tion across the vessel’s cross section.
efficiency and chemical conversion can improve their separation perfor-
in downstream activities as well as mance by adopting a radial system, Succeeding in CO2 removal
to prevent catalyst poisoning or cor- such as a tangential vapour horn New and existing CO2 removal units
rosion. Carbon capture can also help or a Shell Schoepentoeter, which for syngas should also leverage the
to reduce the environmental impact divides the feed into a series of dis- latest generation of packing solu-
of different manufacturing activities. crete horizontal streams, using a tions, such as Sulzer’s fourth-gen-
number of vanes (see Figure 1). This eration NeXRing random packing.
How to feed the system can be installed in new facilities or Replacing conventional second-gen-
In all cases, businesses need to retrofitted in existing units. eration random packings with the
select advanced and robust solu- Thanks to these innovative latest components can increase
tions that can minimise both the designs, it is possible to dissipate the column capacity by 25-35% while
concentration of CO2 in syngas and kinetic energy and momentum of maintaining, or increasing, separa-
energy consumption while maxim- the stream, reducing the likelihood tion efficiency and product quality.
ising throughput and yield. When it of liquid entrainment. In addition, Upgrades in the design are one of
comes to separation, column pack- the vapour horn can provide the the main reasons for these substan-
ing and internals play a key role in feed with centrifugal acceleration tial improvements. These changes
the overall efficiency of the process. that promotes the liquid-vapour have allowed manufacturers to
One of the first elements to look separation process, even under high increase the uniformity of their bed
at is how the syngas feed enters the loads. The Shell Schoepentoeter can distribution as well as the system’s
separation unit. Conventional feed also decrease the momentum of the wettability, strength, and durabil-
managing
LIVE WEBINAR
Presenter: Mark Dyson, MBA
VP Mobile Water Services,
Veolia Water Technologies
metals assets
PTQ / DIGITALREFINING
Ensuring business
continuity with
siness, we
r of petro-
reliable and secure
One metric ton of catalyst (2205 lb) is
about US$80 000 at current prices, so the
nies, ship- treated
Short Cut Corporation iswater
losing $32 000-
precious $40 000 on every metric ton it sells.
of course. To illustrate an additional risk of selling to a
m manage broker, in many countries the pre-existing lia-
n
Mobile Water
In this example, the trick was essentially
‘legalised theft’: the precious metals refiner
Koch-Glitsch 7
Atlas Copco Gas & Process 10 www.koch-glitsch.com
www.atlascopco.com/downstream
Man Energy Solutions 15
Axens OBC www.man-es.com
www.axens.net
OHL Gutermuth 19
www.ohl-gutermuth.de/en
Böhmer 33
www.boehmer.de/en Refining India 2021 IBC
www.refiningindia.com
Burckhardt Compression 24
www.burckhardtcompression.com Servomex 9
www.servomex.com
DigitalRefining.com 21
www.digitalrefining.com Siirtec Nigi 31
www.siirtecnigi.com
TO MAKE SURE YOU RECEIVE THE Q3 JUL, AUG SEP ISSUE OF PTQ
UPDATE YOUR REGISTER FOR REGISTER FOR ANY
SUBSCRIPTION A PRINT COPY A DIGITAL COPY QUESTIONS?
CLICK HERE PRINT ISSUE DIGITAL ISSUE CONTACT US
TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE
E
SAVE
TH ! 20-21 SEPTEMBER 2021 – THE SHANGRI-LA, NEW DELHI
E
DAT
2019 ABOUT THE EVENT NEW FOR
REVIEW This important event brings together engineers and 2021!
senior management from Indian and international
operating and refining technology companies. NEWSPAPER
200+
DELEGATES Presentations will address the major contribution of A COPY WILL BE
refining and petrochemicals to India’s burgeoning GIVEN TO EVERY
economy and the developments that are needed to ATTENDEE
63% underpin that contribution.
SENIOR PEOPLE
WITHIN INDIAN LUNCH & LEARN
REFINERIES CALL FOR PAPERS 10-MINUTE
Send your abstract to: presentations@refiningindia.com
PRESENTATION TO
38 SHOWCASE YOUR
TECHNICAL SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES TECHNOLOGY
PRESENTATIONS For more information: sales@petroleumtechnology.com DURING LUNCH
CURRENT SPONSORS