ACTION PLAN S.Y.

2021-2022
Areas Objective Methodologies Time Persons Involved Source Budgetary Expected Actual Remar
s Frame s of Requireme Output Accomplishm ks
Funds nts ents

Students’ To  Provide the students  August-  Students Univers 30,000.00 Enhanced

Performan enhance additional engaging May.  Teachers/Resourc ity Mathemati
ce the and accessible  Through e Speaker Funds cs
Mathemati Mathematics out the  Administrators Performan
cs activities through e- whole  Campus Director ce of
Performan learning games and course.  Faculty students
ce of tools that are easy to  Parents learning
students’ use like Quizlet, online.
 Community/Enviro
learning Quizzes, GeoGebra, nment.
online. Desmos Calculator,
etc. to practice.
 Assist the students
using accessible
Mathematics video
lectures/tutorials like
Khan Academy,
Organic Science, and
others.
 Equip students with
accessible
Mathematics e-books
and e-workbooks like
Math Planet and
others.
 Conduct live
discussion in
Mathematics through
zoom or google meet.
Students’ To make  Provide practical  August-  Students Univers 20,000,000. Students’
E- students’ learning approach in May.  Teachers/Resourc ity 00 e-Learning
Learning Mathemati Mathematics like  Through e Speaker Funds experienc
Experienc cs e- game-based learning, out the  Administrators e is
es learning cooperative learning, whole  Campus Director efficient
Experienc and others. course.  Faculty enough to
es  Provide students  Parents provide
efficient. engaging and good
 Community/Enviro
accessible results.
nment.
Mathematics
76
 activities and video
lessons/lectures that
they can access any
time.
 Provide tablets and
stable connectivity kit
to those students
who don’t have any
devices to use in
online learning.
 Conduct virtual
orientation through
zoom or google meet
about technologies
that are used in e-
learning.
 Embrace the power
of communication
through social media
channels, e-mails,
students chat groups,
and more.
Self- To  Provide accessible  August-  Students Univers 20,000.00 Increased
Efficacy increase reading materials, May.  Teachers/Resourc ity students’
students’ video lectures, and  Through e Speaker Funds self-
self- assignments for out the  Administrators efficacy in
efficacy in mastery like Khan whole  Parents learning
learning Academy to allow course.  Community/Enviro Mathemati
Mathemati students to create a nment. cs.
cs schedule that
coincides with their
commitments and
work responsibilities.
 Provide collaborative
mathematics
activities that improve
students’ planning
and their desire for
improvement.
 Give excellent
communication and
positive feedback to
guide the students
through the task or
77
 motivate them to
make their best effort.
Usefulnes To  Provide web  Students 10,000.00 Strengthe
s strengthen applications and  Teachers/Resourc ned the
The accessible e Speaker Usefulnes
Usefulnes Mathematics  Administrators s of e-
s of e- activities like e-  Campus Director learning in
learning in learning games, Math  Faculty Mathemati
Mathemati tools like Quizlet,  Parents cs.
cs. Quizzes, GeoGebra, Community/Environme
Desmos, Calculator, nt.
and others, so that
students can learn
and practice for
mastery.

System To  Provide reliable and  August-  Students Univers 10,000.00 Upgraded

Quality upgrade accessible learning May.  Teachers/Resourc ity system
the resources and tools Throughout e Speaker Funds quality of
system in mathematics like the whole  Administrators e-learning
quality of Khan academy Math course.  Campus Director in
e-learning tutorials, recorded  Faculty Mathemati
in video tutorials, and  Parents cs.
Mathemati others and upload it  Community/Enviro
cs. in google classroom nment.
or odilo to increase
their learnings in
Mathematics for
quality education
services.
 Provide time to
respond to students’
concerns and others.

Effectiven To  Provide different  August-  Students Univers 10,000.00 Improved

ess improve learning styles like May.  Teachers/Resourc ity the
the visual media Throughout e Speaker Funds effectiven
effectiven presentation of the whole  Administrators ess of e-
ess of e- Mathematics lessons, course.  Campus Director learning in
learning in text form  Faculty Mathemati
Mathemati presentation, and  Parents cs.
cs. audio presentation.  Community/Enviro
 Provide open line nment.
communication to
78
 students.
 Provide contact
information for the
system IT support
staff regularly if
needed.
 Design and provide
sites and e-learning
platforms that are
easy to navigate,
accessible, and have
assurance for a
better quality of
learning in
Mathematics.
Satisfactio To raise  Provide an organized  August-  Students Univers Boosted
n the course and syllabus May.  Teachers/Resourc ity the
satisfactor on the web. Throughout e Speaker Funds satisfactio
y rate in  Provide devices like the whole  Administrators n of
learning smartphones/laptops/ course.  Campus Director students
Mathemati tablets and a stable  Faculty in learning
cs online. connectivity kit to  Parents Mathemati
those who don’t have cs online.
 Community/Enviro
any. nment.
 Provide open line
communication to
students.
Challenge To  Provide devices like  August-  Students Univers Overcame
s overcome smartphones/laptops/ May.  Teachers/Resourc ity challenges
challenges tablets and a stable Throughout e Speaker Funds in learning
in learning connectivity kit to the whole  Administrators Mathemati
Mathemati those who don’t have course.  Campus Director cs online.
cs online. any of them.  Faculty
 Provide additional  Parents
engaging and  Community/Enviro
accessible nment.
Mathematics
activities like e-
learning games and
tools that are easy to
use like Quizlet,
Quizzes, GeoGebra,
Desmos, Calculator,
and deliverable
79
 actions to practice
and master.
 Give excellent
communication and
positive feedback to
guide the students
through the task or
motivate them to
make their best effort.

Benefits To gain  Provide devices like  August-  Students Univers Gained

more smartphones/laptops/ May.  Teachers/Resourc ity more
benefits in tablets and a stable Throughout e Speaker Funds benefits in
e-learning. connectivity kit to the whole  Administrators e-learning.
those who don’t have course.  Campus Director
any of it for quality  Faculty
learning.  Parents
 Community/Enviro
nment.
Leisure To boost  Provide different  August-  Students Univers Boosted
Interest leisure leisure activities May.  Teachers/Resourc ity leisure
interest in that are Throughout e Speaker Funds interest in
learning accessible online the whole  Administrators learning
Mathemati that help them course.  Campus Director Mathemati
cs online. learn more in  Parents cs online.
Mathematics.  Community/Enviro
nment.
Prepared by: Approved:

GABALES, YLLENIE C.
SABANDAL, MIRASOL D. ELDIE V. AVENIDO
SALUTA, JOSETTE FILMAR B. CTU Moalboal, Campus Director

BERMUDEZ, DANIEL K.

Researchers

80
Activity Design for ___________________________

Webinar 2021
3A’s – ASSIST, ACCESS, AND ASSESS
Building Bridges to the New Normal Education

DATE:
August 28-29, 2021

VENUE:
Zoom Meeting

Prepared by:

GABALES, YLLENIE C.

SABANDAL, MIRASOL D.

SALUTA, JOSETTE FILMAR B.

BERMUDEZ, DANIEL K.

BSED – MATH III

CTU MOALBOAL

for the

Commission on Higher Education

CEBU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

81
I. Identifying Information

Program Title : Webinar 2021: 3A’s – ASSIST, ACCESS, AND ASSESS

Building Bridges to the New Normal Education
Program Description : This is a two-day webinar for teachers and students

Duration : Two (2) days

Management Level of : University

Program Level __________________________________
Delivery Mode : Webinar/Lecture and Focused Group Discussion

Target Participants : CTU - Moalboal Math Teachers and Students

Number of Participants : participants

Activity Code (WFP) : __________________________________________

Training Code (TMS) : __________________________________________

Total Budget : ₱30,000.00

Source of Funds : School MOOE

82
II. The Program Content and Delivery Mode

A. The Program Content and Expected Outputs:

SESSION TITLE SESSION CONTENT EXPECTED

OBJECTIVES OUTPUTS

Welcoming
participants

Explanation of the
topics

To enhance the Topics: Enhanced

Mathematics (1) Practical Mathematics
Students’
Performance of Learning Style Performance of
Performance
students’ learning and Approach students learning
online. in E-Learning online.
(2) Collaborative
Online
Mathematics
Resources
and Activities
(3) Importance of
Feedback

Students’ E- Welcoming Students’ e-

Learning participants Learning
Experiences To make students’ experience is
Mathematics e- Explanation of the efficient enough to
learning topics provide good
Experiences results.
efficient. Topics:

(1) Utilization of
Digital
Learning
Resources
and Open
Educational
Resources
(2) Use of
appropriate
Technology in

83
 E-learning.
(3) Embracing the
power of
communicatio
n through
social media
channels and
more.

B. Type of Training : WEBINAR

Venue : ZOOM MEETING
Date : AUGUST 28-29,
2021
Level : UNIVERSITY

C. Methodology:

The webinar will help both teachers and students through introducing

appropriate mathematics learning tools and approach in e-learning to improve

the teaching and learning process in mathematics online. This will introduce a lot

of ways to deliver online instructions that would help teachers decide which to

use for a more effective and successful teaching and learning process. To

enhance students’ e-learning experience with the goal to have a positive

performance in mathematics. To upgrade the institution’s support and services

achieving a better e-learning experiences and outcomes.

Researchers plan a webinar to make an improvement in students’ e-

learning experiences for gained a positive academic performance in

mathematics.

D. Details of Budgetary Requirement

84
 BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS FOR MEAL AND SNACKS
ALEGRIA DISTRICT
Item Expenditure No. of No. Unit Price Total
of Amount
Person
s Day
s
Food & Snacks 10 2 ₱300.00/d 6, 000.00
ay
Over All 6,000.00
Cost

Prepared by:

GABALES, YLLENIE C.

SABANDAL, MIRASOL D.

SALUTA, JOSETTE FILMAR B.

BERMUDEZ, DANIEL K.

BSED – MATH III

Submitted by:
VICTORIANO I. BORLA

PSDS

This Activity Design entitled Webinar 2021: 3A’s – ASSIST, ACCESS,

AND ASSESS Building Bridges to the New Normal Education is on August 28-29,

2021 via Zoom Meeting.

85
 Recommending Approval:

MARY ANN FLORES EdD

CID Chief Education Supervisor

GRACE P. CATACUTAN, Ed. D.

Senior Education Program Specialist
Human Resource Development Section (HRDS)/ Learning & Development (L & D)

JEFFREY P. SEVILLA
Senior Education Program Specialist
Planning & Research

Certifying Availability of Funds:

MA. THERESA CALUMPANG

Accountant III- (for Division Office)
Bookkeeper/s (for District/School Activities)

Approved:

MARILYN A. ANDALES EdD, CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent

Title
August 28 - 29, 2021
TRAINING MATRIX
Day 1 – 2 August 28 - 29, 2021

86
MATRIX FOR THE 2-DAY TEACHER AND STUDENTS WEBINAR FOR
EFFECTIVE TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS ONLINE

Time Day 1 Day 2

(Students’ Performance) (Students’ E-Learning
Experiences)

7:30– 8:00 Registration Unfreezing

Topic 1: Utilization of
Digital Learning
8:00- Opening
Resources and Open
10:00 Program and Overview
Educational Resources
MORNING

10:00-
SESSION

BREAK BREAK
10:15

Topic 1: Practical Topic 2: Use of

10:15 - Learning Style and appropriate Technology
12: 00 Approach in E-Learning in E-learning.

12:00 – 1:30 LUNCH BREAK

Topic 2: Collaborative Topic 3: Embracing the

Online Mathematics power of communication
1:30 – Resources and Activities through social media
3:30 channels and more.
AFTERNOON

3:30-3:45 BREAK BREAK

SESSION

Topic 3: Importance of Reflection

3:45– 5:00
Feedback

Prepared by:

87
 GABALES, YLLENIE C.

SABANDAL, MIRASOL D.

SALUTA, JOSETTE FILMAR B.

BERMUDEZ, DANIEL K.
Researchers

Recommending Approval:

JOYCE N. GUADIARIO
District INSET
Coordinator
Certified Learning
Facilitator

Approved by:

VICTORIANO I. BORLA
PSDS

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aboderin, O. S., (2011). The Status of Information and Communication Technology
(ICT)
in Secondary Schools in Ondo State.Masters Dissertation. University of Ado
Ekiti.

Acharya, B. R., (2017). Factors affecting difficulties in learning mathematics by

mathematics learners. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 8-15.

Adedoyin, O. B., and Soykan, M., (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the
challenges and opportunities, Interactive Learning Environments, DOI:
10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

Adnan, M., and Anwar, K., (2020). Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic:

88
 Students' Perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51.

Ahn, J.Y., and Edwin, A., (2018). An e-Learning Model for Teaching Mathematics on an
Open-Source Learning Platform. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 19, 255–
267.

Akrofi, O., (2020). Academic Achievement of Primary School Pupils: Investigating Home
Environment Factors Contributing to Low Academic Performance, E-Journal of
Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(2): 49-57.
https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2020061.

Al-Ammari, J., and Hamad, S., (2008). Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning at
UOB. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference and Exhibition for
Zain E-learning Center.

Alexander, S., (2001). E-LEARNING DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPERIENCES.

Education
+ Training, Volume 43 Number 4/5 2001 pp. 240-248.

Ali, A., and Ahmad, I., (2011). Key factors for determining students’ satisfaction in
distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University.
Contemporary Education Technology, 2(2), 118-134. Retrieved from
http://www.cedtech.net/articles/22/222.pdf

Ali, M., Hossain, S. M. K., and Ahmed, T., (2018). Effectiveness of E-learning for
University Students: Evidence from Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Empirical
Research, 8(10), 352-360.

Alkhalaf, S., Drew, S., AlGhamdi, R. and Alfarraj, O., (2012). E-learning System on
Higher
Education Institutions in KSA: Attitudes and Perceptions of Faculty Members.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science 47, 1199-1205.

Almanasreh, H., (2017). e-Learning Mathematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05211.

Alsawaie, O., and Alghazo, I., (2010). The effect of video-based approach on
prospective
teachers’ ability to analyze mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics
Teacher Education. 13. 223-241. 10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8.

Alstete, J. W., and Beutell, N. J., (2004). Performance indicators in online distance
learning courses: a study of management education. Quality Assurance in
Education, 12(1), 6-14.

Alyami, M., Melyani, Z., Al Johani, A., Ullah, E., Alyami, H., Sundra, F., et al, (2017).
The

89
 impact of self-esteem, academic self-efficacy and perceived stress on academic
performance: a cross-sectional study of Saudi psychology students. Eur J Educ
Sci (EJES).;4(3):51–68.

Amir, L.R., Tanti, I., Maharani, D.A. et al. (2020). Student perspective of classroom and
distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the undergraduate dental study
program Universitas Indonesia. BMC Med Educ 20, 392.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02312-0

Andersson, A., (2008). Seven Major Challenges for E-Learning in Developing Countries
Case Study eBIT, Sri Lanka. http://oru.diva-
portal.org/smash/get/diva2:201280/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Anger, S., and Heineck, G., (2010). Do smart parents raise smart children? The
intergenerational transmission of cognitive abilities. Journal of Population
Economics, 23(3): 1105-1132.

Aoyama, H., (1954). A study of the stratified random sampling. Annal Institute of
Statistical Mathematics,6, 1–36.

Apuke, (2017). Quantitative Research Methods A Synopsis Approach. Arabian Journal

of
Business and Management Review (Kuwait Chapter), Volume 6 (10), 40-47.

Argentin, G., Gui, M., Pagani, L., and Stanca, L., (2014). The Impact of Digital Literacy
on Educational Outcomes: Evidence from Performance Tests.

Askar, P., and Umay, A., (2001). Ilkogretim matematik ogretmenligi ogrencilerinin
bilgisayarla ilgili oz-yeterlikalgisi [Perceived computer self-efficacy of the students
in the elementary mathematics teaching programme]. Hacettepe University
Journal of Education, 21, 1-8.

Ash, K., and Davis, M. R., (2009). E-Learning’s Potential Scrutinized in Flu Crisis.
Education Week, 28(31), 1-12.

Ayanda, D., Eludiora, S., Amassona, D., and Ashiru, M., (2011). Towards a Model of E-
learning in Nigeria Higher Institutions: An Evolutionary Software Modeling
Approach. Information and Knowledge Management, 1(1), 31-39.

Ashby, J., Sadera, A. S., and McNary, S. W., (2011). Comparing student success
between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face.
Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 128-140. Retrieved from
http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?
q=cache:wRAZMCkznO8J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en &as_sdt=0,44

90
Baby, A. and Kannammal, A., (2020). Network Path Analysis for developing an
enhanced
TAM model: A user-centric e-learning perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav.,107, 1–
7.

Bandura, A., (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. A

Psychological Review, 84(20), 191-215.

Bandura, A., (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian journal of

social psychology, 2(1), 21-41.

Bowers, J.S. & Stephens, B. (2011). Using technology to explore mathematical

relationships: a framework for orienting mathematics courses for prospective
teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(4). Retrieved from
https://doi-org.exproxy.rowan.edu/10.1007/s10857-011-9168-x

Bradley, R. H., Corwyn, R. F., McAdoo, H. P., and García Coll, C., (2001). The home
environments of children in the United States Part I: Variations by age, ethnicity,
and poverty status. Child Development, 72, 1844-1867. Accessed on 15 July.
doi:10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00382

Bryman and Bell, (2007). The Ethics of Management Research:An Exploratory Content
Analysis. British Journal of Management, 18, 63-77.

Bubou, G. M. and Job, G. C., (2020). Individual innovativeness, self-efficacy and e-

learning readiness of students of Yenagoa study Centre, National Open
University of Nigeria. A Journal Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning,
https://www.emerald.com/insight/2397-7604.htm.

Budiman E. and Wicaksono O., (2016). Measuring quality of service for mobile internet
services, 2016 2nd International Conference on Science in Information
Technology (ICSITech) Balikpapan, 300-305. doi:
10.1109/ICSITech.2016.7852652.

Burns, T., (2005). E-learning: The future of quality training. Quality Progress 38, no. 2:
32-7. Desanctis, G., A.-L. Fayard, M. Roach, and L. Jiang. 2003. Learning in
online forums. European Management Journal 21, no. 5: 565-77.

Cacace, M. (2019). Effects of using Google Classroom on teaching math students with
learning disabilities.

Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., and Barbaranelli, C. (2011).
The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic
achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
81(1), 78-96. doi: 10.1348/2044-8279.002004

91
Causapin, M. G. A., (2012). Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Its Relation to Proficiency-
Promoting Behavior and Performance.

Chan Y. F., Ranjit K.S., Jamiah Baba and Eliza Parman. (2007). Computer Education
for
Classroom Teaching. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill

Chatterjee, I. and Chakraborty, P., (2021). Use of Information Communication

Technology by Medical Educators Amid COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.
Journal
of Educational Technology Systems.49(3):310-324.
doi:10.1177/0047239520966996

Chen, C. C., and Yang, S. C., (2006). The Efficacy on online Learning Cooperative
Learning System, the Perspective of Task-Technology fit. Campus Wide
Information Systems, 23(3).

Chen, N. S., Lin, K. M. and Kinshuk, (2008). Analysing users’ satisfaction with e‐
learning
using a negative critical incidents approach, Innovations in Education and
Teaching International, 45:2, 115-126.

Chetty, M., Haslem, D., Baird, A., Ofoha, U., Sumner, B. and Grinter, R. E. (2011). Why
Is My Internet Slow?: Making Network Speeds Visible. Pg. 1889 – 1898.

Cho, M. H., and Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Educ. 34,

290–301. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.835770

Choi, J., Walters, A., and Hoge, P. (2017). Self-reflection and math performance in an
online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 21(4).

Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, J., and Bhaskar, P., (2019). Effectiveness of e-
learning
portal from students’ perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach.
Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-
2018-0027. www.emeraldinsight.com/1741-5659.htm

Christensen, R. and Knezek, G. (2015). The technology proficiency self-assessment

questionnaire (TPSA): evolution of a self-efficacy measure for technology
integration, in Brinda, T., Reynolds, N., Romeika, R. and Schwill, A. (Eds),
Proceedings of the KEYCIT2014: Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT
Conference, KEYCIT, Potsdam, pp. 311-318.

Christie, M. F., & Ferdos, F. (2004). The mutual impact of educational and information
technologies: Building a pedagogy of e-learning. Journal of Information
Technology Impact, 4(1), 15-26

92
Chua, B. B. and Dyson, L. E., (2004). Applying the ISO 9126 model to the evaluation of
an e-learning system. Faculty of Information Technology.
https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/perth04/procs/chua.html

Chyung, S. Y., (2001). Systematic and systemic approaches to reducing attrition rates
in
online higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3),
36−49.

Chyung, S. Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy, and
academic performance. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 213-
222.

Clark, R.C., and Mayer, R.E. (2008). Learning by viewing versus learning by doing:
Evidence-based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance
Improvement, 47, 5–13.

Coldwell, J., Craig, A., Paterson, T., and Mustard, J., (2008). Online students:
Relationships between participation, demographics and academic performance.
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(1), 19-30. Retrieved from
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30017242 /coldwell-onlinestudents-2008.pdf.

Considine, G. and Zappala, G., (2002). Factors Influencing the Educational

Performance of Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds

Cortez, C. P. (2020). Blended, distance, electronic and virtual-learning for the new
normal
of mathematics education: A senior high school student’s perception. European
Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 1(1), e02001.

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., and Glowatz, M., (2020). COVID-19: 20
Countries' Higher Education.

Creswell, J. W., (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crippen, K. J., Biesinger, K. D., Muis, K. R., and Orgill, M. (2009). The role of goal
orientation and self-efficacy in learning from web-based worked examples. Jl. of
Interactive Learning Research, 20(4), 385–403.

Crothers, L. M., Hughes, T. L., and Morine, K. A., (2008). Theory and cases in school-
based consultation. A resource for school psychologists, school counsellors,
special educators, and other mental health professionals.

Daguno-Bersamina, K., and Relativo, J., (2020). Life After Lockdown: How schools and

93
 classes will be like in the Philippines. Retrieved on July 14, 2020. Retrieved from
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2020/05/29/2013427/life-after-lockdown-
massive-shift-online-learning-mounts-digital-gap-between-rich-and-poor-widens
Education.

Davis, 1989, F.D. Davis. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user
acceptance of information technology. MIS Q., 13 (3) (1989), pp. 319-334\

Davis, A. (2017). Measuring student satisfaction in online mathematics courses—

RESEARCH. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning,
14, 2.

Dapp, T. F., Stobbe, A., Wruuck, P., Keane, B., Napier, J., Sabadra, A., Yamada, Y.,
Speyer, B., Deutsche, Bank, A. G., Hoffmann, R., (2012). The future of (mobile)
payments.

Daymont, T., and Blau, G., (2011). Student performance in online and traditional
sections
of an undergraduate management course. Journal of Behavioral & Applied
Management, 9(3), 275-294. Retrieved from
http://www.ibam.com/pubs/jbam/articles/vol9/no3/ jbam_9_3_3.pdf

Dhawan, S., (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Vol
49,
Issue 1.

Dobbs,K., (2000). Who’s in charge of e-learning? Training, Vol.37No.6, pp.54-58.

Doménech-Betoret, F., Abellán-Roselló, L., and Gómez-Artiga, A. (2017). Self-Efficacy,

Satisfaction, and Academic Achievement: The Mediator Role of Students’
Expectancy-Value Beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.

Eitle, T. M. (2005). Do gender and race matter? Explaining the relationship between
sports participation and achievement. Sociological Spectrum, 25(2), 177-195.

Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., and Fung, C.C., (2016). Perceived Ease of Use and
Perceived Usefulness of Social Media for e-Learning in Libyan Higher Education:
A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. International Journal of Information and
Education Technology, 6(3), 192-199.

El Mamoun, B., Erradi, M., and El Mhouti, A., (2018). Using an Intelligent Tutoring
System
to Support Learners’ WMC in e-learning: Application in Mathematics Learning.
Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 13, 142–156.

Eteng, U., and Ntui, I., (2009). Access to E-Learning in the Nigerian university system

94
 (NUS): a case study of University of Calabar. Information Technologist (The),
6(2).

Fabianic, D. (2002), “Online instruction and site assessment”, Journal of Criminal

Justice
Education, Vol.13No.1,pp.173-186.

Fabito, B. S., Trillanes, A. O., & Sarmiento, J. R. (2021). Barriers and challenges of
computing students in an online learning environment: Insights from one private
university in the Philippines. International Journal of Computing Sciences
Research, 5(1), 441-458. doi: 10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.51

Falloon, G., (2011). Exploring the virtual classroom: What students need to know (and
teachers should consider). Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 439-
445. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no4/Falloon_1211.htm

Fan, W., Lindt, S. F., Arroyo-Giner, C. A. and Wolters, C. A. (2010). The role of social
relationships in promoting student academic self-efficacy and MIMIC approaches
to assess factorial mean invariance. International Journal of Applied Educational
Studies, 5(1), 34-53.

Foster, C., (2016). Confidence and competence with mathematical

procedures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(2), 271-288.

Gadanidis, G., and Geiger, V., (2010). A social perspective on technology enhanced
mathematical learning—from collaboration to performance. ZDM, 42(1), 91–104.

Gafoor, K. A., & Kurukkan, A. (2015). Why High School Students Feel Mathematics
Difficult? An Exploration of Affective Beliefs. Online Submission.

Galy, E., Downey, C., and Johnson, J., (2011). The Effects of Using E-Learning Tools in
Online and Campus-based Classrooms on Student Performance. Journal of
Information Technology Education, 10, 209-230.

Gębka, B. (2014). Psychological determinants of university students’ academic

performance: an empirical study. J. Further High. Educ. 38, 813–837. doi:
10.1080/0309877X.2013.765945

Gianluca, A., Marco, G., Laura, P., and Luca, S., (2014). The Impact of Digital Literacy
on Educational Outcomes: Evidence from Performance Tests.

Gillett-Swan, J., (2017). The Challenges of Online Learning Supporting and Engaging
the
Isolated Learner. A Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20-30.

95
Gladieux, L., and Swail, W. S., (1999). The virtual university and educational
opportunity:
Issues of equity and access for the next generation. Washington, DC: The
College Board. Retrieved from http://www.educationalpolicy.org/pdf/Virtual
%20University.pdf

Goldstein, D., (2016). Down with Algebra II. Slate.

Gunn, C., McSporran, M., Macleod, H., and French, S., (2003). Dominant or different?
Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of Asynchronous
Learning Networks, 7(1), 14−30.

Hadijah, S., and Shalawati, S., (2017). Investigating Teacher ‘Barrier to ICT (Information
Communication Technology) Integration in Teaching English at Senior High
School in Pekanbaru. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 5,
302-310.

Hijazi, ST., and Naqvi R., (2006). FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’

PERFORMANCE. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology. Volume 3. Number 1.

Holmlund, H., Lindahl, M., and Plug, E., (2008). The causal effect of parent's schooling
on children's schooling: a comparison of estimation methods, IZA Discussion
Paper 3630, Bonn.

Hodges, C. B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A

review of the literature and directions for research. Performance Improvement
Quarterly, 20(3/4), 7-25. Hodges, C. B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of
online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for
research. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3/4), 7-25.

Honicke, T., and Broadbent, J., (2016). The influence of Academic Self-efficacy on
Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. Educ. Res. Rev 17, 63-84. doi:
10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002

Ichinose, C and Bonsangue, M, (2016). Mathematics Self-Related Beliefs and Online

Learning. Learning Assistance Review, 21(1), 55-70.

Iftakhar, S., (2016). GOOGLE CLASSROOM: WHAT WORKS AND HOW? Journal of
Education and Social Sciences, Vol. 3, (Feb.) ISSN 2289-9855.

Irfan, M., Kusumaningrum, B., Yulia, Y., and Widodo, S. A., (2020). Challenges during
the pandemic: Use of e-learning in mathematics learning in higher education.
Infinity, 9(2), 147-158.

Islam, A.K.M. Najmul, (2013). Conceptualizing Perceived Usefulness In E-Learning

96
 Context and Investigating Its Role in Improving Students' Academic
Performance. ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 8.
http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/8

Islam, A.K.M. Najmul, (2016). E-learning system use and its outcomes: Moderating role
of perceived compatibility. Telematics and Informatics, 33 (1), 48-55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.010.

Islam, N., Beer, M., and Slack, F., (2015). E-Learning Challenges Faced by Academics
in Higher Education: A Literature Review. A Journal of Education and Training
Studies, 3(5), 102-112.

Jaggars, S., & Xu, D. (2010). Online learning in the Virginia community college system.

Jarvis,D., H., (2012). Teaching Mathematics Teachers Online; Strategies for Navigating
the Interaction of Andragogy Technology and Reform-based Mathematics
Education, pp.187-199.

Jeong Y. A. and Akugizibwe E., (2018). An e-Learning Model for Teaching Mathematics
on an Open Source Learning Platform. International Review of Research in Open
and Distributed Learning, Volume 19, Number 5.

Johnson, R.D., Hornik, S., and Salas, E. (2008). An empirical examination of factors
contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International
Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, pp. 356-369

Jones, S. J. and Long, V. M., (2013). Learning Equity between Online and On-Site
Mathematics Courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1),
1-12.

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., and Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value
as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Comput.
Educ. 62, 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.027

Jović, M., Stankovic, M. K., and Neskovic, E., (2017). Factors affecting students’
attitudes
towards e-learning. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and
Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 22(2), 73-80.

Juan, Á. A., Huertas, M. A., Cuypers, H., and Loch, B., (2012). “Mathematical e-
learning”
[preface to online dossier]. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC).
Vol. 9, No 1.pp. 278-283 UOC.

Juliane, C., Arman, A. A., Sastramihardja, H. S., and Supriana, I., (2017). Digital
Teaching

97
 Learning for Digital Native; Tantangan dan Peluang. Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa dan
Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 3(2), 29-35.

Jun, J., (2005). Understanding dropout of adult learners in e-learning (Unpublished

doctoral dissertation). The University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

Kabilan, M. K., and Khan, M. A., (2012). Assessing preservice English

languageteachers’
learning using eportfolios: Benefits, challenges and competencies gained.
Computers & Education, 58(4), 1007-1020.

Kearns, L. R., (2012). Student Assessment in Online Learning: Challenges and

Effective Practices. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 198-
208.

Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Aristovnik, A., and Umek, L. (2019). Exploring critical factors
of the perceived usefulness of blended learning for higher education students.
PloS one, 14(11), e0223767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223767

Khan, B. H., (2005). Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and

evaluation: IGI Global.

Kim, C., Park, S.W., and Cozart, J., (2014). Affective and motivational factors of
learning
in online mathematics courses. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 45, 171–185.

Kisanga, D.H. and Ireson, G., (2016). Test of e-Learning Related Attitudes (TeLRA)
scale:
Development, reliability and validity study. International Journal of Education and
Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT),
12(1), 20-36.

Kitsantas, A., and Chow, A. (2007). College students’ perceived threat and preference
for
seeking help in traditional, distributed and distance learning
environments. Comput. Educ. 48, 383–395. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.008

Khlifi, Y., (2020). An Advanced Authentication Scheme for E-evaluation Using Students
Behaviors Over E-learning Platform. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 15, 90–111.

Koh, E., and Lim, J., (2012). Using online collaboration applications for group
assignments: The interplay between design and human characteristics.
Computers and Education, 59, 481-496.

Koper, R. and Tattersall, C., (2004). New directions for lifelong learning using network

98
 technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology. 35. 689 - 700.
10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00427. x.

Krishnan, S. (2018). Students’ perceptions of learning mode in mathematics. MOJES:

Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 32-41.

Kupczynski, L., Ice, P., Gibson, A. M., Richardson, J., and Challoo, L., (2011). The
impact
of frequency on achievement in online courses: A study from a South Texas
University. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 141-149. Retrieved from
http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/10.3.3.pdf

Lai, PC., (2016). Design and security impact on consumers’ intention to use single
platform E-payment. Interdiscip Inf Sci.;22(1):111–22.

Luaran, J.E., Samsuri, N.N., Nadzri, F.A., Baharen, K., Rom, M., (2014). A study on the
student’s
perspective on the effectiveness of using
e-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 123. 139 – 144.

Lazarides, R., Gaspard, H., & Dicke, A. L., (2019). Dynamics of classroom motivation:
Teacher enthusiasm and the development of math interest and teacher support.
Learning and Instruction, 60, 126-137.

Lee, J. (2014). An exploratory study of effective online learning: Assessing satisfaction

levels of graduate students of mathematics education associated with human
and design factors of an online course. International Review of Research in Open
and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 111-132.

Liaw, S. S., (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction,behavioral

intention, and effectiveness of e-learning:A case study of the Blackboard system.
Computers and Education 51, 864-873.

Li, C., and Lalani, F., (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever.
This is how. Retrieved from
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-
online-digital-learning/

Lim, D. H. (2004). Cross cultural differences in online learning motivation. Educational

Media International, 41(2), 163-175.

Lin, Y. W., Tseng, C. L., and Chiang, P. J., (2016). The effect of blended learning in
mathematics course. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and
Technology Education, 13(3), 741-770.

Little-Wiles, J., Fernandez, E., Fox, P., (2015). Understanding gender differences in

99
 online learning. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, El
Paso, TX, USA, 21–24 October 2015; Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA; Volume 2015, pp. 1–4.

Liu, S., Gomez, J., Khan, B., and Yen, C. (2007). Toward a learner-oriented community
college online course dropout framework. International Journal on E-Learning,
6(4), 519–542.

Liu, X. and Koirala, H., (2009). The Effect of Mathematics Self-Efficacy on Mathematics
Achievement of High School Students. NERA Conference Proceedings, 30.

Luaran, J. E., Samsuri, N. N., Nadzri, F.A., and Mohamad Rom, K. B., (2014). A study
on
the student’s perspective on the effectiveness of using e-learning. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences 123, 139 – 144.

Lynch, R., and Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online
learning in a blended learning context. Int. Rev. Res. Open Dist. Learn. 5, 1–16.
doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.189

Maheshwari, G. (3021). Factors affecting students’ intentions to undertake online

learning: an empirical study in Vietnam. Educ Inf Technology.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10465-8

Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., and Baumert, J. (2005). Academic
self‐concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects
models of causal ordering. Child development, 76(2), 397-416.

McSporran, M., and Young, S,. (2001). Does gender matter in online learning?
Retrieved
from http://hyperdisc.unitec.ac.nz/research/ALTJpaper_9.pdf

Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., Bitner, M. J., (2000). Self-service
technologies for Mathemtics: understanding customer satisfaction with
technology-based service encounters. J Mark. 64(3):50–64.

Mian, A., and Khan, S. (2020). Medical education during pandemics: A UK perspective.
BMC Med. 18, 1–2.

Misfeldt, M., and Sanne, A (2012). Formula editors and handwriting in mathematical e-
learning. Retrieved July 3, 2014, from http://www.igi-global.com/chapter/formula-
editors-handwritting-mathematical-learning /57947?camid=4v1

Mohammed, W. F., (2020). How Covid-19 affects education for people with disabilities
in

100
 Ghana, MyJoyOnline. https://www.myjoyonline.com/news/education/wunpini-
fatimatamohammed-how-covid-19-affects-education-for-people-with-disabilities-
inghana/. Retrieved on 10th July, 2020.

Mohr, A. T., Holtbrügge, D. and Berg, N., (2012). Learning Style Preferences and the
Perceived Usefulness of E-learning. A Journal in Teaching in Higher
Education, 17(3), 309-322.

Momanyi,J. M., Too, J., and Simiyu, C., (2015). Asian Journal of Education and e-
Learning (ISSN: 2321 – 2454) Volume 03 – Issue 05, October 2015 Asian Online
Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 337 Effect of Students’ Age on Academic
Motivation and Academic Performance among High School Students in Kenya

Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, P. and Alonso-García, S.,

2020.
E-Learning in the Teaching of Mathematics: An Educational Experience in Adult
High School.

Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., and Maczuga, S. (2009). Risk factors for
learning-related behavior problems at 24 months of age: Population-based
estimates. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 401-413.
doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9279-8

Msomi, A. M., and Bansilal, S. (2018). The experiences of first-year students in

mathematics in using an e-learning platform at a University of Technology. South
African Journal of Higher Education, 32(5), 124-139.

Momanyi, J., Too, J., and Simiyu, C., (2015). Effect of Students' Age on Academic
Motivation and Academic Performance among High School Students in Kenya.
Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 3.

Muse, H. E., (2003). A persistence issue: Predicting the at-risk student in community
college Web-based classes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nova
Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.

Musingafi, M. C. C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., and Zebron, S., (2015). Challenges
for Open and Distance learning (ODL) Students: Experiences from Students of
the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59-66.

Navarro, P., and Shoemaker, J. (2000). Performance and perceptions of distance

learners in cyberspace. American Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 15–35.

Ndlovu, M. C., and Mostert, I. (2018). Teacher perceptions of Moodle and throughput in
a blended learning programme for in-service secondary school mathematics
teachers. Africa Education Review, 15(2), 131-151.

101
Nguyen, T., (2015). The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant
Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and
Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.

Novo-Corti, I., Varela-Candamio, L., & Ramil-DíAz, M., (2013). E-learning and face to
face mixed methodology: Evaluating effectiveness of e-learning and perceived
satisfaction for a microeconomic course using the Moodle platform. Computers in
Human Behavior, 29(2), 410-415.
Octaberlina, L. R., and Muslimin, A. I. (2020). Efl Students Perspective towards Online
Learning Barriers and Alternatives using Moodle/Google Classroom during
Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6),1-9.

OECD (2013), PISA 2012 Results: Ready to Learn: Students’ Engagement, Drive and
Self-Beliefs (Volume III), PISA, OECD Publishing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201170-en

Ogungbeni, J. I., Adekanye, A.O., Bamigbose, A. A., and Sulaiman, M. A., (2016).
Internet
Use among Undergraduates in Nigeria: The Role of Policy. Journal of Information
and Knowledge Management. 6(6). Pp 88-94.

Onyema, E., Anthonia, U., and Deborah, E., (2019). Potentials of Mobile Technologies
in
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Inquiry-based Learning Approach. 2.
http://flyccs.com/journals/IJEMS/Latest_articles.html. 10.5121/IJE.2019.1421.

Otto, D., Iddrisu, W. A., Kessie, J. A., and Larbi, E., (2018). Structural Model of
Students’
Interest and Self-Motivation to Learning Mathematics. Education Research
International.

Paechter, M., Macher, D., Martskvishvili, K., Wimmer, S., and Papousek, I., (2017).
Mathematics Anxiety and Statistics Anxiety. Shared but Also Unshared
Components and Antagonistic Contributions to Performance in Statistics. Front.
Psychol. 8, 1–13.

Panyajamorn, T., Suanmali, S., Kohda, Y., Chongphaisal, P., and Supnithi, T., (2018).
Effectiveness of E-Learning Design in Thai Public Schools. Malaysian Journal of
Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 1-34.

Paul, J. and Jefferson, F., (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in

an
Online vs. Face-to-Face Environmental Science Course From 2009 to 2016.
Frontiers Computer Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007.

Pierce, R., and Stacey, K., (2010). Mapping pedagogical opportunities provided by

102
 mathematics analysis software. International Journal of Computers for
Mathematical Learning. 15(1), 1–20.

Price, L., (2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: Challenging
stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5),
349–359.

Qian, Y., (2018). Application Research of E-learning Network Teaching Platform in

College English Reading Teaching. Educ. Sci. -Theory & Pract., 18, 1819–1827.

Quadri, N. N., Muhammed, A., Sanober, S., Qureshi, M. R. N., and Shah, A., (2017).
Barriers effecting successful implementation of e-learning in Saudi Arabian
universities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET),
12(06), 94-107.

Rasheed, R.A., Kamsin, A., and Abdullah, N.A., (2020). Challenges in The Online
Component of Blended Learning: A Systematic Review. Comput. Educ., 144,
103701.
Renninger, K. A. and Hidi, S., (2016). The power of interest for motivation and
engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., and Bond, R., (2012). Psychological correlates of
university
students’ academic performance: A systematic Review and Meta-
analysis.Psycho. Bull. 138, 353-387. doi: 10.1037/a0026838

Rhode, J., (2009). Interaction equivalency in self-paced online learning environments:

An
exploration of learner preferences. The International Review of Research in
Open and Distributed Learning, 10(1).

Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., David, D., and Langley, R., (2004). Do Psychosocial
and Study skill factors Predict College outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychol.
Bull., 130, 261-288. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261

Rocchio, R. A., (2014). An Introduction to BYOE Mobile Data Collection. EDUCAUSE

Center for Analysis and Research (ECAR).

Roffe, I., (2002). E-learning: engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality

Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40-50.

Roschelle, J., Shechtman, N., Tatar, D., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S.,
Knudsen,
J., and Gallagher, L., (2010). Integration of technology, curriculum, and
professional development for advancing middle school mathematics: Three
large-scale studies. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 833–878.

103
Rovai, A. P., and Baker, J. D., (2005). Gender differences in online learning: Sense of
community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. Quarterly Review
of Distance Education, 6(1), 31−44.

Saba, T., (2012). Implications of E-learning systems and self-efficiency on students’

outcomes: a model approach. Human-Centric Computing and Information
Sciences, 2(1), 6.

Salamania, U. T., (2017). The Reflection Social-Cognitive Theory in Mathematics

Education.”Optimizing Educational Research Findings to Improve the Quality of
Life.”

Sahin, Y.G.., Balta, S., and Ercan, T., (2010). THE USE OF INTERNET RESOURCES
BY UNIVERSITY STUDENTS DURING THEIR COURSE PROJECTS
ELICITATION: A CASE STUDY. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology – volume 9 Issue 2.

Sahu, P., (2020). Closure of universities due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19):
impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus,
12(4).

Sarabadani, J., Jafarzadeh, H., and ShamiZanjani, M. (2017). Towards understanding

the determinants of employees’ e -learning adoption in workplace. International
Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 13(1), 38-49.
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijeis.2017010103

Sarvestani, M. S., Mohammadi, M., Afshin, J., MA, and Raeisy, L., (2019). Students’
Experiences of E-Learning Challenges; A Phenomenological Study.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 10(3), 1-10.

Sayer, L., Gauthier, A., and Furstenberg, F. (2004) Educational differences in parents'
time with children: Cross-national variations. Journal of Marriage and Family,
66(5): 1152-1169.

Schunk D. H., Pintrich P. R., and Meece J. L., (2008). Motivation in Education: Theory,
Research and Applications, 3rd Edn., Upper saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice
Hall.

Seif, M. H., Sarmadi, M. R., Ebrahimzadeh, I., and Zare, H., (2012). A model for
predicting
intention to use e-learning based on epistemological beliefs. Life Science
Journal, vol. 9, 926-929.

Shahibi, M. S. and Ku Nur Khafidhah Ku Rusli, (2017). The Influence of Internet Usage

104
 on Student’s Academic Performance. International Journal of Academic
Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(8), 873-887. DOI:
10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i8/3301

Shopova, T., (2014). Digital literacy of students and its improvement at the university.
Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(2), 26-32.

Liaw, S. S., (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction,behavioral

intention, and effectiveness of e-learning:A case study of the Blackboard system.
Computers and Education 51, 864-873.

Spector, J., Merrill, M., Merrienboer, J. V., and Driscoll, M., (2008). Glossary of terms.
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology 3e,
817-827.

Spence, D. J., and Usher, E. L., (2007). Engagement with Mathematics Courseware in
Traditional and Online Remedial Learning Environments: Relationship to Self-
Efficacy and Achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(3),
267–288. doi:10.2190/ec.37.3.c 

Stewart, C., Bachman, C., and Johnson, R., (2010). Students’ characteristics and
motivation orientations for online and traditional degree programs. Journal of
Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 367−379.

Sukamolson, S., (2007). Fundamentals of quantitative research. Language Institute

Chulalongkorn University, 1-20.

Sukendro, S., Akhmad, H., Khaeruddi, K., Boy, I., Syahruddin, S., Fredrik, A. M.,
Hikmad,
H., (2020). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand
students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education
context. Heliyon. Volume 6, Issue 11, e05410

Suliman Oun Alla, M. M., (2013). The Impact of System Quality in E-learning System.
Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 1(2), 14-23.

Suliman Oun Alla, M. M., Dr. Faryadi, Q., and Dr. Fabil, N. B., (2015). The Impact of
System Quality in E-learning System. International Journal of Computer Science
and Electronics Engineering (IJCSEE), 3(1), 37-42.

Sullivan, P., (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: Male and female
college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of
Research and Practice, 25(10), 805−818.

Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., and Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A Comparison of Student

105
 Achievement and Satisfaction in an Online versus a Traditional face-to-face
Statistics Class. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 233–250. doi: 10.1007/s10755-
005-1938-x

Swan, K. (2002). Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of

interaction, Education, Communication & Information, 2:1, 23-49.

Taplin, M., and Jegede, O., (2001). Gender differences in factors influencing
achievement
of distance education students. Open Learning, 16(2), 133−154.

Tegegne, K. M., (2014). The influence of e-learning on the academic performance of

mathematics students in fundamental concepts of algebra course: The case in
Jimma University. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 9(2), 41-59.

Tekinarslan, E., (2011). Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward

online technologies. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 10(37), 120-134.

Teo, T., (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model
development and test. Computers & Education, vol. 57, 2432-2440.

Teo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B., and Hoi, C.K.W., (2018). Investigating pre-service teachers’
acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in their future teaching: a Chinese
perspective. Interact. Learn. Environ. 27 (4), 1–17.

Titilope, E. A., Idiong, U.S., (2017). Depression and anxiety: The bane of academic
achievement among science students offering mathematics. Med Sci. 21, 8–15.

Toquero, C. M., (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education amid the
COVID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine Context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).

Trakru, M. and Jha, T. K., (2019). E-Learning Effectiveness in Higher Education.

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 6(5), 96-
101.

Ukpata, S. I., and Nancy, A. (2012). Mathematics as a Tool in Human Capital Formation
and Development in Nigeria. Journal of Economics, 3(2), 95–107.

Umek, L., Keržič, D., Aristovnik, A., and Tomaževič, N., (2015). Analysis of selected
aspects of students’ performance and satisfaction in a Moodle-based e-learning
system environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education, 11(6), 1495-1505.

Umoh, J. B. and Akpan, E. T., (2014). Challenges of Blended E-Learning Tools in

Mathematics: Students’ Perspectives University of Uyo. Journal of Education and
Learning, 3(4), 60-70.

106
Usher E. L., and Pajares F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: critical review of
the literature and future directions. Rev. Educ. Res. 78, 751–796.
10.3102/0034654308321456

Wadsworth, L., Husman, J., Duggan, M., and Pennington, M., (2007). Online
mathematics achievement: Effects of learning strategies and self-efficacy.
Journal of Developmental Education, 30(3), 6-14.

Williams, C., (2011). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research
(JBER), 5(3).

Wilson, D., and Allen, D., (2011). Success rates of online versus traditional college
students. Research in Higher Education Journal, 22, 55-62. Retrieved from
http://www.w.aabri.com/manuscripts/11761.pdf

Woodrow, J.E.J. A., (1991). Comparison of Four Computer Attitude Scales. J. Educ.
Comput. Res. 1991, 7, 165–187.

Yang, Y., Cho, Y., Mathew, S., and Worth, S., (2011). College student effort expenditure
in online versus face-to-face courses: The role of gender, team learning
orientation, and sense of classroom community. Journal of Advanced
Academics, 22(4), 619-638.doi: 10.1177/1932202X11415003.

Yaniawati, P., Kariadinata, R., Sari, N., Pramiarsih, E., and Mariani, M., (2020).
Integration of e-Learning for Mathematics on Resource-Based Learning:
Increasing Mathematical Creative Thinking and Self-Confidence. International
Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(6), 60-78.

Yasan G., (2001). The relationship between parental educational level and academic
success of college freshmen. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations, pg. 14.

Yilmaz, R., (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and
motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251-260.
Yokoyama, S., (2019). Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in
Online Learning: A Mini Review. Front. Psychol. 9:2794. doi:
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02794

Young, B. A. & Smith., T. M (1997). The social context of education. The Condition of
Education, 3, 1-27.

Yukselturk, E., and Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online
course. Educ. Technol. Soc. 10, 71–83.

Zabadi, A. M., and Al-Alawi, A. H., (2016). University Students’ Attitudes towards E-
Learning. International Journal of Business and Management; Volume 11, No.6

107
Zaharah, Z., and Kirilova, G. I., (2020). Impact of Corona Virus Outbreak Towards
Teaching and Learning Activities in Indonesia. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya
Syar-i, 7(3).

Zakaria, M., Bustaman, H. A., Abd Manaf, K. & Abdul Rahman, R. (2020). Exploring
Benefits and Challenges of Adopting Google Classroom in Perspective of Higher

Institution's Learners. Test Engineering & Management, 9739-9749.

Zakiah, N. E., and Fajriadi, D., (2020). Self-regulated learning for social cognitive
perspective in mathematics lessons. In Journal of Physics: Conference
Series (Vol. 1613, No. 1, p. 012049). IOP Publishing.

Zhang, D., and Livingstone, S., (2019). Inequalities in how parents support their
children’s
development with digital technologies, London School of Economics,
http://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and
communications/assets/documents/research/preparingfor-a-digital-future/P4DF-
Report-4.pdf

Zhen, R., Liu, R. D., Ding, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., and Xu, L., (2017). The mediating roles
of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relation between basic
psychological needs satisfaction and learning engagement among Chinese
adolescent students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 210-216.

Zheng, Y., Zhao K., and Stylianou, A., (2013). The impacts of information quality and
system quality on users’ continuance intention in information-exchange virtual
communities: an empirical investigation, Decision Support Systems, (56), 513-
524.

Zimmerman, W. A., & Kulikowich, J. M., (2016). Online learning self-efficacy in students
with and without online learning experience. American Journal of Distance
Education, 30(3), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1193801

Zulkarnain, Z., Heleni, S., and Thahir, M., (2020). Digital literacy skills of math students
through e-learning in COVID-19 era: a case study in Universitas Riau. In Journal
of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1663, No. 1, p. 012015). IOP Publishing.

108
APPENDICES

109
 Appendix A

Transmittal Letter

110
 Appendix C (Questionnaire)

STUDENTS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
COLLEGE STUDENTS’ E-LEARNING EXPERIENCES
The purpose of this study is to investigate the e-Learning experiences of college
students in relation to their Mathematics competence as a basis for crafting a structural
model. This study is being conducted in Cebu Technological University - Moalboal
Campus. This questionnaire asks about your personal beliefs about e-learning. It is up
to you if you set your name or not. Your responses are going to be anonymous and can
never be linked to you personally. Thank you for your cooperation.
PART I. PROFILE: Supply your answers in the space provided. And check ( √ ) the
most appropriate response.
Name (optional):_________________________
Age: _________________________
Gender: ( ) Male ( ) Female

Course: Year Level:

College of Education ( ) First Year
( ) Bachelor of Elementary Education ( ) Second Year
( ) Bachelor of Secondary Education ( ) Third Year
( ) Bachelor of Technical and Livelihood Education ( ) Fourth Year
Agricultural, Forestry, and Fisheries
( ) BS in Fisheries
Hospitality Management
( ) BS in Hospitality Management
Trade, Craft and Industrial
( ) BS in Industrial Engineering
Possession of Technology:
( ) Android phone
( ) iPhone
( ) Tablet
( ) Laptop
( ) Computer
Others (please specify) ____________

111
Type of Internet Connection
( ) Mobile Data
( ) Broadband
( ) Hotspot
( ) Cable
( ) Wi-Fi

Accessibility of Internet Connection

( ) Poor
( ) Average
( ) Strong

Mode of Instruction
( ) Google Classroom
( ) Zoom
( ) Google Meet
( ) Odilo
( ) Others

Level of Digital Literacy

( ) Beginner
( ) Advanced
( ) Proficient

112
Instructions: For each statement put check ( √ ) to show your level of agreement:
Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. Do not check two boxes.

DisagreeStrongly

Disagree

Strongly
Technology Usage and Skills

Agree

Agree
Questions
1. When it comes to studying Mathematics, I am
confident in my ability to use computer
technology.
2. I like working Mathematics with computers.
3. I do not believe that the impact of computing
technology is a threat to me.
4. When it comes to writing Math assignments, I
tend to use a computer.
5. To learn mathematics, I would like to use
computers.
6. During my self-study in mathematics, I typically
use the internet.
7. Normally, I download and get my math learning
materials from the internet.
8. My preferred method of learning mathematics is
to read an e-book.
9. I use the internet to download images, graphs,
papers, tasks, course materials, and
presentations.
10 While using the internet to study Mathematics, I
. have several issues/problems.
11 In my mathematics self-study, I use an
. electronic library.
12 I prefer to send Mathematics educational
. materials to my colleagues, friends, and
teachers electronically (via e-mail).
13 When I collect Mathematics educational material
. from the internet, I feel happy and joyful.
14 For Math interaction, I use a variety of
. educational websites.

113
15 Overall, I am comfortable using computer
. technology to learn mathematics.
Source: Abdelrahim M. Zabadi and Amr Hussein Al-Alawi (2016). University Students’ Attitudes
towards E-Learning.
PART II. EXTENT OF THE LEARNERS’ E-LEARNING EXPERIENCES:
Instructions: For each statement put check ( √ ) to show your level of agreement:
Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. Do not check two boxes.

a. Perceived Self-efficacy
as a learner . . .

DisagreeStrongly

Disagree

Strongly
Agree

Agree
Questions

1. In Mathematics, I am confident in my use of

online learning materials.
2. In Mathematics, I am comfortable using e-
learning features.
3. In Mathematics, I am confident in my use of the
e-learning method.
b. Perceived Usefulness:
as a learner . . .
1. I believe that e-learning materials are beneficial
in the field of mathematics.
2. In Mathematics, I believe e-learning is a useful
learning method.
3. Mathematics related e-learning materials, in my
opinion, are educational.
c. E-learning system quality:
as a learner . . .
1. During e-learning Math class, I am satisfied with
the interaction.
2. In terms of Mathematics, I am satisfied with the
e-learning material.
3. In Mathematics, I am satisfied with the internet
speed.
4. In Mathematics, I am satisfied with the e-learning
functions.
d. E-Learning Effectiveness:
as a learner . . .
1. I believe that e-learning can help students
improve their math skills.

114
2. I believe that e-learning can help students learn
mathematics more efficiently.

e. Satisfaction

1. During Math class, I am pleased with the

multimedia instruction.
2. I am satisfied with the Mathematics learning
materials/contents.

3. In Mathematics, I am satisfied with the use of e-

learning functions.
Source: Shu-Sheng Liaw (2007). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction,
behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning.

DisagreeStrongly

Strongly Agree
Disagree
Questions

Agree
f. Challenges:
as a learner . . .
1. In an e-learning environment, learning
mathematics is extremely difficult.
2. E-learning necessitates costly technological
support, especially in mathematics.
3. During Math class, discussions about e-learning
technologies are uninteresting.
4. Using computer programs that include numbers
necessitates a significant amount of mental
effort.
5. The government cannot afford to invest in e-
learning infrastructure for mathematics.
6. Learners become more socially isolated as a
result of e-learning.
7. E-learning technology can be challenging to
use, especially in math classes.
8. It can be frustrating to interact with the computer
system during Math class.
9. E-learning lowers the quality of mathematics
expertise gained.

115
10 Face-to-face approaches are more learner-
. centered than online learning methods.
11 I am uncomfortable reading a Math text book on
. a computer screen than a physical text book.

g. Benefits:
as a learner . . .
1. I believe that using e-learning will help me
develop my math skills.
2. I believe that using e-learning technologies will
help me develop my math skills.
3. In Mathematics, e-learning can boost self-
efficacy.
4. For educational institutions, e-learning is a very
cost-effective option.
5. Electronic instructional materials on Math are
simpler to revise than written materials.
6. Mathematical learning is made more exciting by
the use of computers.
7. In e-learning, I like to read papers about math.
8. E-learning would provide me with more
resources for Mathematical learning than
conventional methods.
9. To plan my Mathematics assignments and
tasks, I tend to use a tablet.
h. Leisure interest:
as a learner . . .
1. I enjoy finding out about new e-learning
developments.
2. I enjoy reading Math material about modern
technological advancements.
3. It's exciting to do math on a computer.
4. I enjoy math games on the computer very much.
5. It's entertaining to communicate via social
media.
6. It is extremely difficult to deliver a mathematics
lecture using electronic technology.
7. E-learning is possible at my institution because
we have sufficient learning opportunities.
8. I love using computers to study Mathematics.
9. It is exhausting to learn mathematics through e-
learning.

116
Source: D. H. Kisanga and G. Ireson (2016). Test of e-learning Related Attitudes
(TelRA) Scale: Development, Reliability and Validity Study.

CURRICULUM V I T AE

117
 Yllenie C. Gabales
09667361230

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Date of Birth : September 11, 1999

Place of Birth : Poblacion East, Moalboal, Cebu
Age : 21 years old
Civil Status : Single
Religion : Roman Catholic
Citizenship : Filipino
Height : 153 cm.
Weight : 46 kg.
Spouse : None
Child : None

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

COLLEGE : Cebu Technological University – Moalboal Campus

Poblacion West, Moalboal, Cebu
Present

SECONDARY : Moalboal National High School

Basdiot, Moalboal, Cebu
April 2018

ELEMENTARY : Moalboal Central Elementary School

Poblacion West, Moalboal, Cebu
March 2012

118
TRAINING, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, AND CONFERENCES

Municipal Leadership Training

Basdiot, Moalboal, Cebu
January 2018

Leadership Training and Team Building

Moalboal, Cebu
December 2018

Seminar on Gender Sensitivity with the Integration of Sexual Harassment Act, Magna
Carta for Women, Anti-Violence against Women and their Children Law and the Online
Sexual Exploitation of Children (OSEC)
Moalboal, Cebu
March, 2019

Leaders’ Seminar
Moalboal, Cebu
November 2019

119
 Mirasol D. Sabandal
09479894528

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Date of Birth : August 11, 1999

Place of Birth : Basdiot, Moalboal, Cebu
Age : 21 years old
Civil Status : Single
Religion : Roman Catholic
Citizenship : Filipino
Height : 150 cm.
Weight : 43 kg.
Spouse : None
Child : None

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

COLLEGE : Cebu Technological University – Moalboal Campus

Poblacion West, Moalboal, Cebu
Present

SECONDARY : Moalboal National High School

Basdiot, Moalboal, Cebu
April 2018

ELEMENTARY : Basdiot Elementary School

Basdiot, Moalboal, Cebu
March 2012

TRAINING, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, AND CONFERENCES

120
Municipal Leadership Training
Basdiot, Moalboal, Cebu
January 2018

Leadership Training and Team Building

Moalboal, Cebu
December 2018

Seminar on Gender Sensitivity with the Integration of Sexual Harassment Act, Magna
Carta for Women, Anti-Violence against Women and their Children Law and the Online
Sexual Exploitation of Children ( OSEC)
Moalboal, Cebu
March, 2019

Leaders’ Seminar
Moalboal, Cebu
November 2019

121
 JOSETTE FILMAR B. SALUTA
09311034953

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Date of Birth : August 1, 1999

Place of Birth : Ilaya Cogon Cruz, Danao City
Age : 21 years old
Civil Status : Single
Religion : Roman Catholic
Citizenship : Filipino
Height : 150 cm.
Weight : 64 kg.
Spouse : None
Child : None

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

COLLEGE : Cebu Technological University – Moalboal Campus

Poblacion West, Moalboal, Cebu
Present

SECONDARY : Badian National High School

Poblacion Badian Cebu
April 2018

ELEMENTARY : Bugas Elementary School

Bugas, Badian, Cebu
March 2012

122
TRAINING, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, AND CONFERENCES

Leadership Training and Team Building

Poblacion Badian, Cebu
(December 2017, December 2015)

Drug Symposium
(December 2016)

Seminar on Gender Sensitivity with the Integration of Sexual Harassment Act, Magna
Carta for Women, Anti-Violence against Women and their Children Law and the Online
Sexual Exploitation of Children (OSEC)
Moalboal, Cebu
March, 2019

123
 DANIEL K. BERMUDEZ
09325035496

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Date of Birth : February 05, 2000

Place of Birth : Saavedra, Moalboal, Cebu
Age : 20 years old
Civil Status : Single
Religion : Roman Catholic
Citizenship : Filipino
Height : 175 cm.
Weight : 75 kg.
Spouse : None
Child : None

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

COLLEGE : Cebu Technological University – Moalboal Campus

Poblacion West, Moalboal, Cebu
Present

SECONDARY : Moalboal National High School

Basdiot, Moalboal, Cebu
April 2018

ELEMENTARY : Saavedra Elementary School

Saavedra, Moalboal, Cebu
March 2012

TRAINING, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, AND CONFERENCES

Municipal Leadership Training

124
Basdiot, Moalboal, Cebu
December 2017

Leadership Training and Team Building

Bala Elementary School
Bala, Moalboal, Cebu
April 2018

3rd Provincial Summer Youth Camp

Alta Resort
Cordova, Cebu
June - July 2019

2nd Leaders’ Summit

Cebu Technological University - Moalboal Campus
Pob. East, Moalboal Cebu
January 2019

Seminar on Gender Sensitivity with the Integration of Sexual Harassment Act, Magna
Carta for Women, Anti-Violence against Women and their Children Law and the Online
Sexual Exploitation of Children (OSEC)
Moalboal, Cebu
March, 2019

5th FSG General Assembly

Cebu Technological University- Carmen Campus
Carmen, Cebu
July, 2019

8th FSG Summit

Cebu Technological University - Moalboal Campus
Pob. East, Moalboal, Cebu
January, 2020

125