0% found this document useful (0 votes)
291 views1 page

Grand Case Presentation Rubric

The document is a case presentation evaluation form from Olivarez College Tagaytay College of Nursing. It evaluates students on a case presentation based on contents, organization and clarity of report, delivery, use of presentation aids, and time management. Scores are given on a 20 point scale for each category based on criteria like depth of discussion, planning, confidence, use of audiovisual materials, and finishing on time. The evaluator fills in the student's name, group, case title, scores, comments, and signs and dates the form.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
291 views1 page

Grand Case Presentation Rubric

The document is a case presentation evaluation form from Olivarez College Tagaytay College of Nursing. It evaluates students on a case presentation based on contents, organization and clarity of report, delivery, use of presentation aids, and time management. Scores are given on a 20 point scale for each category based on criteria like depth of discussion, planning, confidence, use of audiovisual materials, and finishing on time. The evaluator fills in the student's name, group, case title, scores, comments, and signs and dates the form.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

OLIVAREZ COLLEGE TAGAYTAY

COLLEGE OF NURSING
GRAND CASE PRESENTATION

NAME: ______________________________________ GROUP: ___________________


CASE TITLE: ________________________________ DATE: ___________________
CRITERIA 1 – 6 POINTS 7 – 12 POINTS 13 – 20 POINTS SCORE
Lacking depth and incomplete Only some topics are thoroughly In – depth and thorough discussion
CONTENTS treatment of assigned topics. discussed and given an in depth of assigned topics: shows strong
20% treatment: shows moderate evidence of research.
evidence of research.
ORGANIZATION & Lacks planning, totally Minimum planning: needs Well planned, logical presentation
CLARITY OF disorganized and confusing. improvement in logical and well understood by the
REPORT presentation; some portions need audience.
20% clarification.
Nervous, self – conscious, Demonstrates quick recovery Relaxed, self – confident; shows
voice is monotone. from minor mistakes, possesses natural body movements that
DELIVERY body movements that enhance develop enthusiasm and affects
20% presentation: voice projection is audience positively. Voice
satisfactorily varied in volume projection fluctuates in volume and
and inflection. inflection and sustains interest.
PRESENTATION None at all. Make use of some AV materials AV materials are well done and are
AIDS but does not enhance the used to make the presentation more
20% presentation. interesting and meaningful.
TIME Did not finish on time. Hurriedly finishes on time. Finishes within the prescribed time
MANAGEMENT with appropriate pacing.
20%
TOTAL

________________________________________________ _________________________
Name and Signature of Panelist Date

You might also like