0% found this document useful (0 votes)
324 views4 pages

AI Debate: Threat or Benefit?

The document discusses a debate on whether artificial intelligence is dangerous to human life. The affirmative team argues that AI can replace human jobs, leading to job losses. They cite a study that found 36 million people have jobs at high risk of automation. Accountants may also see shifts as AI can analyze data. However, the negative team refutes these points. They argue that while some tasks may be automated, humans still excel at creative and complex jobs that AI cannot replace. With training, humans can learn to work with AI rather than be displaced. Certain jobs like lawyers also involve skills not easily automated. The negative team concludes that AI is not necessarily harmful and may help secure information and keep systems running efficiently.

Uploaded by

4 KT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
324 views4 pages

AI Debate: Threat or Benefit?

The document discusses a debate on whether artificial intelligence is dangerous to human life. The affirmative team argues that AI can replace human jobs, leading to job losses. They cite a study that found 36 million people have jobs at high risk of automation. Accountants may also see shifts as AI can analyze data. However, the negative team refutes these points. They argue that while some tasks may be automated, humans still excel at creative and complex jobs that AI cannot replace. With training, humans can learn to work with AI rather than be displaced. Certain jobs like lawyers also involve skills not easily automated. The negative team concludes that AI is not necessarily harmful and may help secure information and keep systems running efficiently.

Uploaded by

4 KT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

We are debating the resolution: “Is artificial You said:”The advancement of artificial

intelligence dangerous to human life?”. We, intelligence (AI) can replace humans to do
on the affirmative team, strongly support this their jobs.”
It is not exactly. AI can’t replace all jobs of
resolution. Our 3rd point is Job losses
people
 The advancement of artificial
intelligence (AI) can replace humans  Because humans excel at creative
to do their jobs, then increasing the thinking, computers can’t imitate
job losses of people. human connection, AI can’t handle
overly complex or highly strategic
 2019 Brookings Institution study: 36 jobs and someone needs to program
the AI.
million people work in jobs with “high
 In addition, employees can learn to
exposure” to automation, meaning that work with AI rather than being
before long at least 70 percent of their displaced by it through training and
tasks — ranging from retail sales and education initiatives. Because many
market analysis to hospitality and procedures require judgment calls —
warehouse labor — will be done using and AI is still an immature technology
AI — this “attended automation” strategy
would be ideal, guaranteeing the
 Accountants should also prepare for a
robots achieve the right results.
big shift, Messina warned. Once AI is  According to INHUNT WORLD,
able to quickly comb through reams of there are certain jobs that can't be
data to make automatic decisions replaced by AI. For example, lawyers
based on computational or judges. These positions have a
interpretations, human auditors may strong component of negotiation,
well be unnecessary. strategy and case analysis.

Our idea is that AI can threaten human Thank you ladies and gentlemen, I'm from the
security and privacy. Negative team and our team strongly opposes
Ex: According to an article written in 2019 “6 the resolution “AI is harmful to human life”.
dangerous risks of AI”, 26 researchers from Now I will refute the affirmative side and I'll
14 institutions claimed that AI could threaten give our point of view.
security. Their 1st reason is “Security”. They said that
Firstly, it affects digital security. Hackers can AI could threaten human security and privacy
use criminal machines to hack the personal because ppl can use AI systems and machines
data of ppl. Uhmm I have an example, Hiếu to steal the important datas of ppl and the
pc, one of the most famous hackers in VN. In government. They also gave some examples
2013, he stole personally identifiable in4 of like Hieu pc or the conclusion of 26
200 million US citizens with the help of AI. researchers about these problems.
And this action led to millions of ppl losing I have 3 responses:
their money and personal in4. You can find  First, it is not always true that AI
this news in Wikipedia. threatens human security. Because
Secondly, AI could affect political security. Artificial Intelligence systems are
Because AI systems could be the economic more and more modern, they help ppl
key and military assets. If these systems are in a lot in keeping the information safe.
the hands of bad ppl, they might be used in If it isn't safe, why does the
harmful ways and have negative impacts on government still use AI to keep their
the security of an entire country. key economic or military assets?
In conclusion, we've talked about our first key
point: security. Which supports our idea that  Secondly, it is not true that AI is the
AI is very harmful to the life of humans. I cause of losing security in4. The
hope judges can agree reason for the security problem is
human. AI is just the tool helping
humans steal personal data. Even
though AI doesn't exist, ppl still have
millions of ways to do those bad
actions.

 Finally, the source might be biased.


They mentioned an article. I suspect
this is a non-objective article because
the article title is “6 dangerous risks of
AI” right? And the study of 26
researchers is doubted, she didn't give
any source of that study.
 So I've said my refutation with the
perspective of the Affirmative team,
which supports our opinion that “AI is
not harmful to human life”. I hope the
judge can support our idea, thank u.
Negative team: Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Today, we
Thank you ladies and gentlemen, we're are debating the resolution: Is Artificial
debating the resolution “Is Artificial Intelligence harmful to humans' lives? Then, I
Intelligence dangerous to human life?” am going to refute …’ point. Her reason was
We’re on the negative team and we strongly work efficiency.
oppose the resolution. We have ... reasons: You said:”AI can help humans to work more
work efficiency.. and.... Now I will present effectively.”
our first key point: “work efficiency” In fact, AI can increase the dependence and
reduce the ability to make decision of
 The article Top 10 Benefits of humans. Individuals' cognitive, social, and
Artificial Intelligence (AI) which was survival abilities are weakened.
written in August 2020 by 10xDS People's increasing reliance on machine-
Team has shown that AI-powered driven networks will damage their ability to
Robotic Process Automation tools can think for themselves, act independently of
automate interactions between automated systems, and communicate
different business systems and make effectively with others. In addition, people are
the tiresome work easy for the feeling a lack of control over their lives.
company. It can imitate the actions of Decisions on critical parts of digital life are
humans within the digital systems in automatically delegated to code-driven,
the HR, IT, marketing, or sales "black box" systems. People lack input and do
departments to execute any business not understand the context in which the tools
process quickly without needing any operate. They give up their freedom, privacy,
manual effort. and control over their choices; they have no
 Minimize errors: As Robotic Process say in these processes. This influence will be
Automation tools take care of the data felt.
entry and processing jobs, it can make
the digital systems more efficient and
less likely to run into or create any
problems due to data processing
mistakes. This can be especially
beneficial for businesses that cannot
afford to make even the slightest of
errors.
 Increase business efficiency: Artificial
Intelligence can help to ensure 24-
hour service availability and will
deliver the same performance and
consistency throughout the day.
Taking care of repetitive tasks will not
make AI tools get tired or bored
either. This can help to improve the
efficiency of the business and reduce
the stress on the employees, who can
be re-assigned to perform more
complex business tasks that require
manual intervention.
Negative team:
Both the doctor and the patient benefit from You said:”Both the doctor and the patient
artificial intelligence in the detection and benefit from artificial intelligence in the
treatment of sickness. detection and treatment of sickness.”
Quicker diagnoses: simple medical tests,
identify diseases faster with greater accuracy BUT WHAT ABOUT THE BIGGER
e.g. Rwanda: robotics company Zinline QUESTIONS OF ETHICS,
operates a drone-delivery service for urgent RESPONSIBILITY, AND OVERVIEW?
medicines and blood conjunction, the There are actual legal and financial
medicine is packed within minutes, ramifications when the word "malpractice"
transported by an autonomous drive, dropped enters the equation, in addition to the
by parachute into a designated landing area theoretical quandaries regarding who receives
within 30’ (80 kms away) the ultimate blame for a life-threatening
Improved health insurance: mistake. While artificial intelligence is
software platforms to recommend preventive assumed to be fully free of the social and
healthy habits and behaviour, users can experience-based biases that are ingrained in
receive recommendations of providers to see the human brain, these algorithms may be
in their area and insurance plans which better even more susceptible to generating
fit their lifestyles assumptions than individuals if the data they
machine learning algorithms to analyze are trained on is slanted toward one side or
insurance claims to predict cases of fraud the other. Furthermore, providers aren't
confident that AI has their back in the
courtroom or the clinic just yet. A 2017
HIMSS Analytics poll found that more than a
third of respondents are apprehensive to
utilize AI due to its immaturity.
Is AI harmful to human’s lives?

You might also like