2021.10.13 Complaint Filed
2021.10.13 Complaint Filed
L.
. ·-·' .J 5
r, ,. .,. .,
f., ! ; l
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ' "" ··•· IN THRGENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
COUNTY OF WAKE : zan Ci"T 13 p • 1..-
.
-- LI= � I
FILE NO.:
\'.'�!,. "''
Plaintiff,
V.
Defendants.
NOW COMES the Plaintiff Greg Buscemi, individually and on behalf of all other
similarly situated citizens, residents, and taxpayers, against the Defendants, Phil Berger, in his
official capacity as President Pro Tern of the State Senate; Tim Moore, in his official capacity as
the Speaker of the State House of Representatives ("Legislative Defendants"); the Towns of
Wrightsville Beach, Carolina Beach, Kure Beach, Atlantic Beach, Beaufort, and Chapel Hill; and
the Cities of Wilmington, Raleigh, and Durham ("Municipal Defendants") (collectively the
1. The North Carolina Constitution is the supreme law of the land. It contains the
:framework of our government and its provisions are mandatory and binding. If the General
Assembly enacts legislation contrary to its terms and conditions, those acts are void.
2. The main issue before this Court is the constitutionality of certain local acts passed
by the General Assembly exempting the above-named municipalities from the state's general
public laws that otherwise prohibit cities from using proceeds from on-street parking meters for
any purpose other than to defray the cost of enforcing and administering traffic and parking
3. These local modifications allow the Defendants to charge excessive fees for the use
of on-street parking meters and to use the proceeds for public purposes other than defraying the
cost of administering traffic and parking ordinances. As explained below, these local acts violate
the state constitution and must be declared void. Moreover, any money unlawfully exacted by the
Municipal Defendants under this unconstitutional scheme must be refunded to the people.
4. This is an action for declaratory, injunctive, and other appropriate relief from local
acts passed by the General Assembly exempting the above-named municipalities from the general
public law of the state that prohibits local governments from maintaining and operating an on-
5. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Articles 26 and 26A of
PARTIES
8. Defendant Phil Berger is sued in his official capacity as the President Pro Tempore
1
of the North Carolina Senate pursuant to N.C. R. Civ. P. 19(d). On information and belief,
9. Defendant Tim Moore is sued in his official capacity as the Speaker of the North
Carolina House of Representatives pursuant to N.C. R. Civ. P. 19(d). On information and belief,
and body politic capable of suing and being sued, having, upon information and belief, no
Plaintiff's claims.
11. Defendant Town of Carolina Beach is a North Carolina municipal corporation and
body politic capable of suing and being sued, having, upon information and belief, no
Plaintiffs claims.
12. Defendant Town of Kure Beach is a North Carolina municipal corporation and
body politic capable of suing and being sued, having, upon information and belief, no
Plaintiffs claims.
1
Rule 19(d) requires that the Speaker of the House and the President Pro Ternpore of the Senate,
as agents of the State through the General Assembly, must be joined as defendants in any civil action
challenging the validity of a state statute or provision of the state constitution under State or federal law.
[4]
13. Defendant City of Wilmington is a North Carolina municipal corporation and body
politic capable of suing and being sued, having, upon information and belief, no governmental
14. Defendant Town of Atlantic Beach is a North Carolina municipal corporation and
body politic capable of suing and being sued, having, upon information and belief, no
Plaintiffs claims.
15. Defendant Town of Beaufort is a North Carolina municipal corporation and body
politic capable of suing and being sued, having, upon information and belief, no governmental
immunity to Plaintiffs claims or otherwise having waived any immunity to Plaintiffs claims.
16. Defendant City of Raleigh is a North Carolina municipal corporation and body
politic capable of suing and being sued, having, upon information and belief, no governmental
immunity to Plaintiffs claims or otherwise having waived any immunity to Plaintiffs claims.
17. Defendant Town of Chapel Hill is a North Carolina municipal corporation and body
politic capable of suing and being sued, having, upon information and belief, no governmental
immunity to Plaintiffs claims or otherwise having waived any immunity to Plaintiffs claims.
18. Defendant City of Durham is a North Carolina municipal corporation and body
politic capable of suing and being sued, having, upon information and belief, no governmental
immunity to Plaintiffs claims or otherwise having waived any immunity to Plaintiffs claims.
FACTS
19. The Town of Wrightsville Beach ("WB") collects millions of dollars each year
through its proprietary operation and maintenance of an illegal public parking scheme, the profits
of which are deposited directly into its general revenue fund. By imposing increasingly excessive
[5]
fees, rates, and fines on people and families desiring access to our state's public trust waters and
beaches, WB has consistently been able to generate parking profits that account for nearly half of
20. WB relies heavily on parking revenues to maintain a property tax rate of $0.1275
per $100 of assessed valuation, the lowest of any municipality in the county by more than half.
Carolina Beach has the second lowest rate ($0.2250), followed by Kure Beach ($0.3300), and
Wilmington ($0.4984). The same is true in comparison to other area beach towns including Surf
City ($0.4100), Topsail Beach ($0.3125), and Bald Head Island ($0.6863).
21. The estimated property tax valuation of Wrightsville Beach exceeds $2.6 billion,
with a median property value of nearly $760,000. A rate increase of just 0.05% would provide at
least $1.3 million in additional revenue, an average annual increase of only $380 per property-
22. Instead, WB charges visitors parking rates of $5/hour or $20/day. The rates are the
same for both on-street metered spaces and off-street parking lots.
27. Upon information and belief, and despite past experience and indications to the
28. North Carolina's public lands, roads, and waterways belong to the People.
29. North Carolina's public trust rights are well established and codified into state law:
the right of the people to the customary free use and enjoyment of
the ocean beaches, which rights remain reserved to the people ofthis
State under the common law and are a part of the common heritage
of the State recognized by Article XIV, Section 5 ofthe Constitution
ofNorth Carolina. These public trust rights in the ocean beaches are
established in the common law as interpreted and applied by the
courts of this State.
It shall be the policy of this State to conserve and protect its lands
and waters for the benefit of all its citizenry, and to this end it shall
be a proper :function of the State of North Carolina and its political
subdivisions to acquire and preserve park, recreational, and scenic
areas, to control and limit the pollution of our air and water, to
control excessive noise, and in every other appropriate way to
preserve as a part of the common heritage of this State its forests,
wetlands, estuaries, beaches, historical sites, openlands, and places
ofbeauty.
art. XIV, § 5.
31. The State is responsible for maintaining public roads, streets, and highways.
32. The General Assembly may pass general laws authorizing cities to regulate or
maintain public roadways. Accordingly, the general public law of this state provides that: "A city
may by ordinance prohibit, regulate, divert, control, and limit pedestrian or vehicular traffic upon
the public streets, sidewalks, alleys, and bridges of the city." N.C. Gen. Stat.§ 160A-300.
33. The general public law allows cities to regulate on vehicular traffic using on-street
parking meters and/or by using off-street parking lots, garages, and other facilities:
§ 160A-301. Parking.
(a) On-Street Parking. -- A city may by ordinance regulate,
restrict, and prohibit the parking of vehicles on the public streets,
alleys, and bridges within the city. When parking is permitted for a
specified period of time at a particular location, a city may install a
parking meter at that location and require any person parking a
vehicle therein to place the meter in operation for the entire time that
the vehicle remains in that location, up to the maximum time
allowed for parking there. Parking meters may be activated by coins,
[7]
(d) The governing body of any city may, by ordinance, regulate the
stopping, standing, or parking of vehicles in specified areas of any
parking areas or driveways of a hospital, shopping center, apartment
house, condominium complex, or commercial office complex, or
any other privately owned public vehicular area, or prohibit such
stopping, standing, or parking during any specified hours, provided
the owner or person in general charge of the operation and control
of that area requests in writing that such an ordinance be adopted.
The owner of a vehicle parked in violation of an ordinance adopted
pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed to have appointed any
appropriate law-enforcement officer as his agent for the purpose of
arranging for the transportation and safe storage of such vehicle.
(e) The registered owner of a vehicle that has been leased or rented
to another person or company shall not be liable for a violation of
an ordinance adopted pursuant to this section if, after receiving
notification of the civil violation within 90 days of the date of
occurrence, the owner, within 30 days thereafter, files with the
officials or agents of the municipality an affidavit including the
name and address of the person or company that leased or rented the
vehicle. If notification is given to the owner of the vehicle after 90
days have elapsed from the date of the violation, the owner is not
required to provide the name and address of the lessee or renter, and
the owner shall not be held responsible for the violation.
34. The general public law expressly authorizes cities to acquire, regulate, and charge
for the use of the "off-street parking facilities" permitted under§ 160A-301(b):
($ 15,000.00 ) from the State Highway Fund: Provided, that such additional sum shall be
made available only in the event that the regular appropriation is insufficient and it shall
be determined by the Director of the Budget that such additional amount is necessary to
carry out the provisions of this Act.
P.L. 1937, Ch.407, Sec. 61.
[9]
35. The term "public enterprise," as defined by the general public law, specifically
36. The General Assembly enacted local modifications to§ 160A-301 exempting the
Municipal Defendants from the general public law that prohibits local governments from profiting
from on-street parking proceeds. These local acts-which expressly allow on-street parking meters
to be activated for profit and permit the proceeds generated from on-street parking meters to be
used for public purposes beyond defraying the costs of enforcing parking ordinances-apply only
to the Towns of Wrightsville Beach, Carolina Beach, Kure Beach, and the City of Wilmington,
S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 2001-9, the City of Raleigh and the Town of Chapel Hill, S.L.
2009-164, the Towns of Atlantic Beach and Beaufort, S.L. 2011-79, and the City of Durham,
S.L. 2014-34. True and accurate copies of the session laws are attached as Exhibits 1 through 5
37. Session Law 1998-86 (S.L. 1998-86) was enacted as a local modification to
G.S.§ 160A-301 for the purpose of exempting Defendant Town of Wrightsville Beach from the
general public law enforced in all other municipalities throughout the state, the legislative intent
S.L. 1998-86.
38. Allowing a city to use on-street parking proceeds "in the same manner in which
proceeds from off-street parking facilities are permitted" essentially nullifies subsection (a) of
regulating state-owned public streets-the revenues from which "may be pledged to amortize
bonds issued to finance such facilities, or usedfor any other public purpose."
39. The primary sponsor of S.L. 1998-86 was former New Hanover County Republican
40. In 2001, S.L. 1998-86 was amended to include the remaining municipalities in New
Hanover County. Session Law 2001-9 (S.L. 2001-9) amended S.L. 1998-86 as follows:
S.L. 2001-9.
41. In 2009, the General Assembly enacted another local act with similar modifications
applicable only in the City of Raleigh and the Town of Chapel Hill. Session Law 2009-164
(S.L. 2009-164) modified§ 160A-301 with the stated legislative purpose as follows:
42. In 201 1, the General Assembly enacted another local act with similar modifications
applicable only in the Towns of Atlantic Beach and Beaufort in Carteret County. Session Law
20 1 1-79 (S.L. 20 1 1-79) modified § 160A-3 0 1 with the stated legislative purpose as follows:
S.L. 2011-79.
43. Session Law 2014-34 (S.L. 2014-34) was enacted as a local modification to
G.S. § 160A-301 applicable only in the City of Durham. The legislative intent and amendatory
S.L. 2014-34.
44. Session Law 201 5-226 (S.L. 20 15-226) modified public law G.S. § 1 60A-301, the
S.L. 2015-226.
45. A municipal corporation is dual in character and exercises two classes of powers--
governmental and proprietary. It has a two-fold existence--one as a governmental agency, the other
as a private corporation.
public in nature and performed for the public good in behalfofthe State rather than for itselfcomes
47. When the activity of a municipality is commercial or chiefly for the private
program subj ect to the revenue restrictions imposed by the general public law in§ 160A-3 0l(a).
program that charges fees to be collected for profit as a general revenue source.
50. The Municipal Defendants exercise proprietary functions when they maintain an
on-street parking program for profit as permitted by the local acts challenged in this action.
COUNT !
Violation of the Limits on Local Legislation Relating to Health, Sanitation, & Nuisances
N.C. Const., art. II, § 24(1)(a)
51. . Plaintiff hereby incorporates all other paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
[ 15]
52. Individuals may seek to redress all constitutional violations, in keeping with the
":fundamental purpose" ofthe Declaration of Rights to "ensure that the violation of [constitutional]
rights is never permitted by anyone who might be invested under the Constitution with the powers
of the State." Corum, 330 N.C. at 782-83, 413 S.E.2d at 289-90; Craig v. New Hanover Cty. Bd.
53. "N.C. Const. art. II, § 24, which expressly forbids the general assembly from
enacting any local, private, or special act or resolution concerning 14 prohibited subj ects, N.C.
Const. art. II, § 24( 1), is the fundamental law ofNorth Carolina and may not be ignored." City of
Asheville v. State, 3 69 N.C. 80, 80, 794 S.E.2d 759, 762 (2016).
54. Specifically, Article II, Section 24 of the North Carolina Constitution provides:
(1) Prohibited subj ects. - The General Assembly shall not enact
any local, private, or special act or resolution:
(2) Repeals. Nor shall the General Assembly enact any such local,
private, or special act by the partial repeal of a general law; but the
General Assembly may at any time repeal local, private, or special
laws enacted by it.
(3) Prohibited acts void. - Any local, private, or special act or
resolution enacted in violation ofthe provisions of this Section shall
be void.
55. It is well-established that: "Special laws are those made for individual cases, local
laws are special as to place." McIntyre v. Clarkson, 254 N.C. 510, 119 S.E.2d 888, 893 (1 961)
(citing Mills v. Board of Commissioners, 175 N.C. 21 5, 218, 95 S.E. 48 1). "A local act is one
[ 16]
operating only in a limited territory or specified locality." Id. "A private law is one which is
5 6. S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 2001-9, S.L. 2009- 164, S.L. 2011-79, and
57. S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 2001-9, S.L. 2009- 164, S.L. 2011-79, and
58. S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 2001-9, S.L. 2009- 1 64, S.L. 2011-79, and S.L.
2014-34 are local acts concerning the prohibited subjects identified in subsections (a), (c), and/or
G) of art. II, §24(1) and, therefore, were enacted in violation of the state constitution.
59. Pursuant to Article II, § 24(3) of the North Carolina Constitution, S.L. 1998-86, as
amended by S.L. 2001-9, S.L. 2009-164, S.L. 201 1-79, and S.L. 2014-34 are void.
60. Plaintiff and all others similarly situated have suffered and will continue to suffer
constitutional injuries unless Defendants are enjoined from enforcing ordinances that permit the
COUNT II
Violation of the Limits on Local Legislation Authorizing the Laying Out, Opening,
Altering, Maintaining, or Discontinuing of Highways, Streets, or Alleys
N.C. Const., art. II, § 24(1)(c)
1. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all other paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
2. Article II, sec. 24 of the state constitution prohibits the General Assembly from
enacting local legislation "[a]uthorizing the laying out, opening, altering, maintaining, or
3. S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 200 1-9, S.L. 2009-164, S.L. 2011-79, and
S.L. 2014-34 authorize the laying out, opening, altering, maintaining, or discontinuing of
4. S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 2001-9, S.L. 2009-164, S.L. 20 11-79, and S.L.
2014-34 are local acts concerning the prohibited subjects identified in subsection (c) of art. II,
5. Therefore, pursuant to Article II, § 24(3) of the North Carolina Constitution, S.L. 1998-
86, as amended by S.L. 2001-9, S.L. 2009- 164, S.L. 2011-79, and S.L. 2014-34 are void.
COUNT III
Violation of the Limits on Local Legislation Regulating Trade, Labor, Mining, or
Manufacturing
N.C. Const., art. II, § 24(1)(j)
1. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all other paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
Article II, sec. 24 of the state constitution prohibits the General Assembly from
enacting local legislation "[r]egulating trade, labor, mining, or manufacturing." art. II,§ 24( 1)G).
3. The North Carolina Supreme Court adopted the definition of to "regulate" as "'to
govern or direct according to rule; ... to bring under the control of law or constituted authority."'
State v. Gulledge, 208 N.C. 204, 208, 179 S.E. 883, 886 ( 1935) (quoting Webster's New
International Dictionary 2099 (2d ed. 1935)), quoted in Cheape v. Town of Chapel Hill, 320 N.C.
N.C. 401, 403, 85 S.E.2d 297, 299 ( 1955), and "trade" has been defined as "a business venture for
profit and includes any employment or business embarked in for gain or profit," High Point
5. S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 2001 -9, S.L. 2009- 164, S.L. 2011-79, and
6. S.L. 1 998-86, as amended by S.L. 2001 -9, S.L. 2009- 1 64, S.L. 201 1 -79, and S.L.
2014-34 are local acts concerning the prohibited subjects identified in subsection G) of art. II,
7. Pursuant to Article II, § 24(3) of the North Carolina Constitution, S.L. 1998-86, as
amended by S.L. 2001-9, S.L. 2009-1 64, S.L. 201 1-79, and S.L. 20 14-34 are void.
COUNT IV
Violation of the Exclusive Emoluments Clause
N.C. Const., art. I, § 32
6. Plaintiffs hereby incorporate all other paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
7. The state constitution provides: "No person or set ofpersons is entitled to exclusive
or separate emoluments or privileges from the community but in consideration of public services."
8. The local session laws challenged herein entitle the Municipal Defendants to
exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community without any consideration of
public services.
Therefore, S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 2001 -9, S.L. 2009- 164, S.L. 20 1 1-79,
COUNT V
Violation of the Public Purpose Clause
N.C. Const., art. V, § 2
1. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all other paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
2. "The power of taxation shall be exercised in a just and equitable manner, for public
purposes only, and shall never be surrendered, suspended, or contracted away." N.C. Const., art.
V,§ 2.
any private enterprise or assume any function which is not in a legal sense public in nature, the
[ 19]
word "private" as used in opinions discussing the powers of a municipality being used to designate
proprietary, as distinguished from governmental, :functions. Mitchell v. N C. Indus. Dev. Fin. Auth.,
273 N.C. 1 37, 1 59 S.E.2d 745 ( 1968) (quoting Britt v. Wilmington, 236 N.C. 446, 450 (1952)).
4. "The revenue derived from the on-street parking facilities is exacted in the
performance of a governmental function. It must be set apart and used for a specific purpose. By
whatever name called, it is in the nature of a tax." Britt v. City of Wilmingto n, 236 N.C. 446, 452,
5. S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 200 1-9, S.L. 2009-164, S.L. 201 1-79, and
S.L. 2014-34 allow the Municipal Defendants to exercise the power of taxation for private
purposes. These local acts violate the Public Purposes Clause and must be declared void.
COUNT VI
Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75.1-1 et seq.
(Defendant Town of Wrightsville Beach)
6. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all other paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
7. At all times relevant to the facts and circumstances giving rise to this action,
alleged herein were acts affecting commerce within the meaning of Chapter 75 of the North
8. The actions of Defendant WB as alleged herein constitute unfair and deceptive acts
9. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' unfair and deceptive trade
practices, Plaintiff and those similarly situated have been damaged, and continue to suffer
additional damages, in an amount in excess of $25,000.00, the exact amount to be shown at trial.
10. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 75- 16, Plaintiffis entitled to treble compensatory damages.
[20]
attorney's fees.
COUNT VII
Violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-4
(Defendant Town of Wrightsville Beach)
2. "A law enforcement officer may issue a citation for an infraction in accordance
authorized by statute, that a person appear in court and answer a misdemeanor or infraction charge
or charges." § 15A-302(a).
4. "An officer may issue a citation to any person who he has probable cause to believe
The citation must: ( 1) Identify the crime charged, including the date, and where
material, identify the property and other persons involved, (2) Contain the name and address of
the person cited, or other identification if that cannot be ascertained, (3) Identify the officer issuing
the citation, and (4) Cite the person to whom issued to appear in a designated court, at a designated
6. "When a citation is issued for a parking offense, a copy shall be delivered to the
operator of a vehicle who is present at the time of service, or shall be delivered to the registered
owner of the vehicle if the operator is not present by affixing a copy of the citation to the vehicle
in a conspicuous place.
adjudication and disposition of infractions lies in the district court division."§ 7A-253 .
[22]
8. Because Defendant WB has not established a process for defending and appealing
parking citations that accords with state law, any citations issued under its illegal scheme must be
declared void, and any unlawfully exacted fines and penalties must be returned.
COUNT VHI
Violation of the County School Fund Clause
N.C. Const., art. IX, § 7(a)
(Defendant Town of Wrightsville Beach)
9. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all other paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
10. The state constitution's County School Fund Clause, art. IX, sec. 7(a), provides:
11. WB imposes civil penalties for violations of its parking ordinances. The monetary
penalties collected from WB's enforcement of its parking program are not appropriated and used
for maintaining free public schools; instead, all revenue collected from the imposition of these
civil penalties is deposited directly into the town's general revenue fund.
12. The critical issue is whether the penalty mandated for violation of the statute is
offender to a civil penalty" which may be collected "by civil action in the nature of debt."
14. It is inescapable that the penalty imposed is to deter future violations and to extract
retribution :from the violator for illegally parking, failing to obtain a registration decal, or violating
some other traffic ordinance designed to regulate and monitor the flow of traffic.
[23]
15. Defendant WB has failed appropriate the civil fines collected through its parking
enforcement for the exclusive use of maintaining free public schools in violation of our state
16. Therefore, any monetary fines and penalties unlawfully deposited into the town's
general revenue fund must be accounted for and reappropriated for the use by the New Hanover
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter judgment
1. Declare S.L. 1998-86, as amended by S.L. 2001-9, S.L. 2009- 164, S.L. 2011-79,
any municipal ordinances adopted under the purported authority of the local acts;
3. Award preliminary and permanent relief enjoining the Defendants from using the
proceeds collected from the use of parking meters on public streets for any purpose other than to
defray the cost of enforcing and administering traffic and parking ordinances and regulations;
4. Order the Defendants to undertake an accounting of all fees and penalties collected
from on-street parking meters, off-street parking lots/facilities, any other revenues received in
relation to parking management (e.g., daily/weekly visitor passes, residential passes, commercial
passes, etc.), and the costs incurred from their enforcement and administration of traffic and
5. Order the Defendants to ascertain their ability to identify persons and/or bank
accounts (via credit/debit card payments and the like) along with the amounts of any unlawfully
[24]
collected fees collected therefrom for a determination of charges capable of being refunded with
6. Order the Defendants to issue refunds of any unlawfully collected fees, rates, and
7. Order the Defendants to account for all fines and penalties lawfully collected for
any breach of the penal laws of the State and require the clear proceeds of the monies collected by
the Defendants to be paid to their respective county finance officer to be placed into the Civil
Penalty and Forfeiture Fund in accordance with Article IX, section 7 of the state constitution.
8. That all costs of the actions, including Plaintiffs reasonable attorney's fees, be
9. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Pro Se Plaintiff
4B Meier Street
Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480
T: (910) 477-3742
E: gbuscemi@wilmlaw.com
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 1997
s/ Harold J. Brubaker
Speaker of the House of Representatives
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2001
s/ Beverly E. Perdue
President of the Senate
s/ James B. Black
Speaker ofthe House of Representatives
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2009
AN ACT TO ALLOW THE CITY OF RALEIGH AND THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL TO
ALLOW ACTIVATION OF PARKING METERS BY CREDIT CARD OR OTHER
ELECTRONIC MEANS AND TO USE PROCEEDS COLLECTED FROM PARKING
METERS FOR PARKING PROGRAMS AND PROVIDING PARKING FACILITIES.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 1 60A-30l (a) reads as rewritten:
" (a) On-Street Parking. - A city may by ordinance regulate, restrict, and prohibit the
par king of vehicles on the public streets, alleys, and bridges within the city. When parking is
permitted for a specified period of time at a particular location, a city may install a parking
meter at that location and require any person parking a vehicle therein to place the meter in
operation for the entire time that the vehicle remains in that location, up to the maximum time
allowed for parking there. Parking meters may be activated by coins or tokens.coins, tokens,
credit cards, or electronic means. A city may establish parking zones within the "cit y and may
require a different moneta r y amount to activate the meter for different time periods based upon
the zone in which the meter is located. Proceeds from the use of parking meters on public
streets must be used to defray the cost of enforcing and administering traffic and parking
ordinances and regulations.operating the parking program or providing parking facilities."
SECTION 2. This act applies to the City of Raleigh and the Town of Chapel Hill
only.
SECTION 3. This act is effective when it becomes law.
In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 25 th day of June,
2009 .
s/ Walter H. Dalton
President of the Senate
s/ Joe Hackney
Speaker of the House of Representatives
I I I I l �l l �l l l l l l l l l l
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2009
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2011
s/ Walter H. Dalton
President of the Senate
s/ Thom Tillis
Speaker of the House of Representatives
1 1 1 !Il l l l l l l l l l l l l
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2011
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2013
s/ Philip E. Berger
President Pro Tempore of the Senate
s/ Thom Tillis
Speaker of the House of Representatives
1 111 1 1 H 11 1 1
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2013