Peter Pur Ton
Peter Pur Ton
Abstract: The authors set out the key turning points in the evolution of defensive architecture in response to the appearance of firearms
in the 1st quarter of the 14th century in Europe, for both attack and defence. Between the first adaptations to defences during the middle of
the 14th century to the emergence of geometric whole defensive systems based on low-lying bastions and interconnected outworks in the
16th century, there was a long period of evolution, experimentation and development, responding to continuous improvement in the range
and destructive power of gunpowder artillery. New designs of castles, fortresses and town walls focussed on the need to shield high medie-
val walls and towers against the power of the gun, but also on how to mount guns on defences and integrate loop holes to keep an attacker
as far away as possible. Ideas diffused rapidly across Europe and the Muslim world. Factors such as the builder’s wealth and the purpose of
the fortress also determined what was constructed.
Citation: Krauskopf C., Purton P. 2020. From Tower to the Bastion. Changes in Fortress Design to Accommodate Gunpowder Artillery
(14th to 16th Centuries). “Fasciculi Archaeologiae Historicae” 33, 89-101, DOI 10.23858/FAH33.2020.006
     It took up to two hundred years to progress from the               ruling class was international and so were medieval
first confirmed appearance of gunpowder weapons in                      engineers.1 Technological change diffused rapidly. It
Europe and the Middle East to the first new fortifications              is rare that we can prove which country or which ruler
wholly designed according to geometric principles and                   was the first to make something wholly new.
based on the use of low-lying, interlocking bastions and                     There is, however, good evidence to suggest that
outworks to defend against and to mount artillery.                      the first changes to fortifications to accommodate the
     The authors are researching this long process in de-               new weapon were made in England, during the Hun-
tail, to explore how and when changes were made in                      dred Years War with France. This fits well with the evi-
fortress design, but also what inspired such develop-                   dence that gunpowder was first used in war in Europe
ments and how effective they were. One challenge is                     in the early 14th century. The English used guns at the
that there are thousands of examples across the Chris-                  battle of Crécy in 1346 and at the siege of Calais imme-
tian and Muslim worlds; the second is that there is un-                 diately after, although with little effect. The first datable
certainty about dating many of them. This paper sug-                    evidence of fortifications being adapted so that the de-
gests a few critical turning points (Fig.1).                            fenders could use these small and inaccurate weapons
     One thing is clear at the start. Wherever a change was             was at the abbey of Quarr on the Isle of Wight, which
made, it did not remain private for long. The medieval                  was subject to seaborne attacks by the French, when
                                                                        a  wall was built with two square holes cut through it
    *
       Brandenburgisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäo-        (Fig. 2), in 1365.2 The gun must have sat on a timber
logisches Landesmuseum; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-934X;
christof.krauskopf@bldam-brandenburg.de
     **
        Independent scholar, London UK; https://orcid.org/0000-              1 
                                                                                  See Purton 2018, passim.
0002-7215-7125; purtonpeter@gmail.com                                        2 
                                                                                  Renn 1968, 301-302.
                                                                                                                                         89
                                              CHRISTOF KRAUSKOPF, PETER PURTON
                  Fig. 1. Map of locations of the sites mentioned in the text. Map C. Krauskopf, BLDAM: Brandenburgisches
                                      Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologisches Landesmuseum.
trestle. Possibly even earlier, 1347, although this date               that firearms were quite common in the 2nd half of the
is not definite, were the holes built into the wall of the             14th century all over Europe. But firearms still had little
rich city of Norwich3 which are also small, and crude                  effect, as we can see from many sources. In a document
(Fig. 3).                                                              from 1395 concerning the liberation of the King of
    Soon after, fortresses are found where holes cut into              Sweden and his son from captivity in Denmark, north-
walls for the use of guns became part of the design it-                ern German towns had to deliver firearms – but only
self. In England and France there are many examples                    four cannons and six guns together with the amount of
from castles and town defences built in the 1370s and                  gun powder required for the weapons. But they had to
1380s. These were usually circular loops for the gun                   provide 300 marksmen with good crossbows! That may
at the end of vertical sighting slits, often using a tim-              shed a light on the significance of firearms until the end
ber base on a stone sill for resting the gun. However,                 of the 14th century.5
the design of the wall or tower was not changed from                        The next turning point was to move from inserting
traditional forms. At this time, it appears, no one was                new gun ports in existing defences to specifically de-
concerned that the guns of the attacker could damage                   signing gun towers, sometimes newly built, sometimes
the masonry, it was only about using the gun to defend                 adapted, which become larger and stronger through the
from the inside. Figure 4 is a  small baron’s castle at                15th century. One of the first may be also from England,
Cooling in Kent built in 1381. It may be a status sym-                 the ‘God’s House Tower’ built at Southampton not later
bol although the English peasants’ revolt and similar                  than 1417 (Fig. 5), again in response to the threat of
loops at other contemporary fortifications in this region              seaborne attack. This projecting tower allowed guns at
(south east England), such as the major works on the                   two levels to fire in all directions from secure positions,
city wall of Canterbury, suggest another context. The                  sitting on the ground or the roof, behind thick walls.6
royal chief engineer, Henry Yevele, was involved in all                     The gun tower rarely stood alone. Alongside the
these works.4                                                          tower, which might be round, rectangular or square,
    The evidence for adapting defensive architecture                   many rulers across Europe turned to the erection of ad-
to the new weapons is quite rare – despite of the fact                 ditional external defences, sometimes of earth, some-
                                                                       times masonry, or both, to shield the old towers and
     3 
          Ayers 1994, 65.
     4 
          Harvey 1944, 36, 38-39; Renn 1982, 117-118; Tatton-Brown          5 
                                                                                 MUB 1907, 535.
1985.                                                                       6 
                                                                                 O’Neil 1960, 11; Saunders 2000, 53-58.
90
                     FROM THE TOWER TO THE BASTION. CHANGES IN FORTRESS DESIGN…
Fig. 2. Quarr Abbey, Isle of Wight. Wall and gun loops, 1365. Photo P. Purton.
Fig. 3. Norwich (Norfolk): loops in St. Stephen’s Gate, possibly 1347. Photo P. Purton.
walls from the increasing effectiveness of guns as a re-          shot weighing 50 to 100 kg. Examples of shield walls
sult of technological progress in metallurgy and im-              are found in the mid-14th century in Germany, a region
provements in the manufacture of gunpowder itself,                where the manufacture of guns and gunpowder was be-
which meant that by around 1400 for the first time                coming a major industry.7
larger guns now posed a  threat to stone defences and
there are increasing references as the 14th century pro-                The German term Schildmauer describes parts of the curtain
                                                                       7 
gressed to bombards demolishing stretches of wall with wall which are taller and thicker than the rest of the curtain wall.
                                                                                                                                  91
                                             CHRISTOF KRAUSKOPF, PETER PURTON
92
                     FROM THE TOWER TO THE BASTION. CHANGES IN FORTRESS DESIGN…
Fig. 5. Southampton (Hampshire), city walls. The ‘God’s House Tower’, built by 1417. Photo P. Purton.
Fig. 6. Bytów (Poland), front of the castle with two guntowers. Photo C. Herrmann.
    Lichtenstein is especially interesting. Between               storey prove the use of guns equipped with hooks. In
1417 and 1436 1000 gulden were invested in two gate-              a  document from 1430, issued by the bishop Johann
houses and a gun tower in the so called Nordburg and              of Würzburg concerning the building activities in his
an outer ward in the Südburg. The loops in the gun                castle Lichtenstein, he mentions the reasons for the
tower were first interpreted as arrow loops construct-            works: “[…] the infidel damned heretics from Bohemia
ed for the use of longbows as they are 3 m long and               [...] therefore it is very important to fortify towns and
20 cm wide. But thorough investigation revealed that              castles in this country.”21
the loops were constructed for two marksmen on two
levels (Fig. 8). Traces of horizontal timber beams on                   Zeune 2011, 76. The source is partially edited by Bodo
                                                                       21 
the two levels and at the shorter gun loops in the upper Ebhardt (1901, 173).
                                                                                                                           93
                                              CHRISTOF KRAUSKOPF, PETER PURTON
Fig. 7. Greiffenberg (Brandenburg), gun loop on the corner tower.       Fig. 8. Lichtenstein (Franconia), reconstruction of the interior gun
                  Photo C. Krauskopf, BLDAM.                             tower. Drawn R. Mayrock, Büro für Burgenforschung J. Zeune.
    One major means of defence very quickly be-                        combined with gun towers, as in the Trendelburg in
came the attempt to keep the attacker away from the                    Hesse24 (Fig. 9). Not before the late 15th century the
inner defences. Two older concepts, the outer ward,                    dimensions of shield walls changed at the time of the
and the shield wall, were adapted to the new defence                   impact of heavy firearms, as in Neu-Scharfeneck in
systems.                                                               Germany. The shield wall of Helfštýn (Helfenstein)
    Shield walls should prevent attackers from caus-                   in Moravia shows two segmented arched projec-
ing damage to the castle buildings with missiles                       tions.25 In many cases shield walls were combined
thrown into the castle. A very impressive example is                   with gun towers as in the Hohkönigsburg in Alsace26
preserved in the Farnsburg near Basel.22 The wall dat-                 or Worlik (Orlík nad Vltavou) and maybe also Výrov
ing to the mid-14th century is 3 m thick and about 8 m                 in Bohemia.27
high. Often shield walls were not that thick, they im-                      The older examples of outer wards from the late
pressed visually but might not have enough strength                    13th and the 14th centuries were often not very thick
to withstand attacks with trebuchets. The impact of                    walls with flanking towers, encircling the inner cas-
the missiles of bombards and cannons in the 2nd half                   tle at a short distance.28 A well-known example is the
of the 15th century was much stronger than that of                     outer ward of the castle of Prague. The construction
trebuchets. Nevertheless, even old shield walls could
withstand bombardments with cannons – the already
mentioned wall of the Farnsburg was bombarded for                           24 
                                                                                Friedhoff 2011, 69-70; Brohl 2013, 189-194; Strickhausen
three weeks in 1444 without success.23 Newly-erected                   and Strickhausen 2015.
shield walls were often equipped with gun loops and
                                                                            25 
                                                                                Durdík and Bolina 2001, 193.
                                                                            26 
                                                                                Uhl and Zeune 1999, 234.
                                                                            27 
                                                                                Orlík: Varhaník 1998, 31, Fig. 15; Výrov: Durdík 2005, 164.
     22 
           To the Farnsburg see Meyer 1981, 94-97; Schmaedecke 2005.
                                                                            28 
                                                                                To the outer ward in general and to its effectiveness see Gut-
     23 
           Meyer 2009, 241 and footnote 25.                            bier 1976; Müller and Schmitt 2007; Meyer 2009.
94
                         FROM THE TOWER TO THE BASTION. CHANGES IN FORTRESS DESIGN…
 Fig. 9. Trendelburg (Hesse). Redrawing after Atlas 1967, 33B,              Fig. 11. Wenecja (Poland). After Salm 2011, Fig. 11.
                 Photo C. Krauskopf, BLDAM.
                                                                                                                                   95
                                            CHRISTOF KRAUSKOPF, PETER PURTON
              Fig. 12. Castle Eisenhardt, Bad Belzig (Brandenburg). Redrawing of a plan of the Royal Government Potsdam
                 by building officer Köhler, 1890 and photos of the three northern towers. Photo C. Krauskopf, BLDAM.
           Fig. 13. Zossen (Brandenburg), battery tower.                       Fig. 14. Gerswalde (Brandenburg), guntower.
                     Photo D. Möller, BLDAM.                                          Photo C. Krauskopf, BLDAM.
Wenecja in central Poland (Fig. 11)34 or Schweinsberg               cannon ports. The first fortresses as complete defensive
in Germany, the last example connected to the master                systems were erected and that happened all over Eu-
builder Hans Jakob von Ettlingen.35                                 rope during a very short time.
    From the mid-15th century a similar defensive con-                  Honberg near Tuttlingen, built from about 1460 on,
cept was established. Very strong walls were erected                is regarded as the first fortress in Württemberg.36 Also
to fortify new places or encircle older castles. They               since the 1460s the electoral princes of Saxony began to
were equipped with big gun towers, evoking the flank-               refortify the castle mount of Belzig, situated on the north-
ing or corner towers attached to the outer ward – but               ern border against the principality of Brandenburg.37
they were much stronger buildings with gun loops and
                                                                           Ottersbach et al. 2014, 135ff.
                                                                         36 
     34 
         Salm 2011, 151.                                                   Bergmann 2005; Langer 2007; Langer 2011; Krauskopf
                                                                         37 
     35 
         Gutbier 1973, 134-157; Ottersbach 2015, 197, Fig. 17.      2011, 54-55; Gebuhr 2018.
96
                            FROM THE TOWER TO THE BASTION. CHANGES IN FORTRESS DESIGN…
 Fig. 15. Auxonne (Côte d’Or). Embrasure in the foot of the gun     Fig. 17. Dubrovnik (Croatia). Minčeta tower and surrounding
       tower, covering ditch and entrance. Photo P. Purton.           outer wall and curtain rebuilt by Michelozzo from 1461.
                                                                                          Photo P. Purton.
                                                                                                                              97
                                            CHRISTOF KRAUSKOPF, PETER PURTON
            Fig. 18. Salses (Pyrénées orientales), 1497: ditch, caponier and corner towers with talus added after failed French
                                                       siege 1503. Photo P. Purton.
Fig. 19. Rhodes. Medieval walls, ditch and tenaille from St. Athanasios tower. Photo P. Purton.
(Fig. 16), near Rome, which dates to the mid-1480s:                    examples of what would become the solution. Here, the
an irregular triangle, round towers at two corners but                 threat of Ottoman artillery had been well recognised
a  bastion at the point, a  continuous corridor inside                 since the fall of Constantinople in 1453 and was con-
and many gun positions, but it still had a donjon and                  tinuous. Dubrovnik’s defences were regularly updat-
machicolations.42 Southern Europe offers the clearest                  ed over many decades (Fig. 17) – the older Minčeta
                                                                       tower stands inside casemates with walls six metres
    42 
        Verdier 1939, 282-316; Hale 1983, 9, 16. Other examples
from these decades include Brancaleone (Ravenna, 1457-1470),           1477), Brolio (Arezzo, 1484), and Sarzana (1487) and Sarzanello
Volterra (Pisa) and Imola (Bologna, both 1472), San Leo (Rimini,       (1493, La Spezia).
98
                         FROM THE TOWER TO THE BASTION. CHANGES IN FORTRESS DESIGN…
Fig. 20. Navarrenx (Pyrénées Atlantiques), bastion fortress built by Italian engineer 1530s. Photo P. Purton.
thick built from 1461, numerous gun positions, a wide                  Not yet a complete early modern fortress, but recognis-
ditch and outworks.43 Near Perpignan, now in southern                  ably closer.
France but then in Aragon, stands the fortress of Salses                   The 16th century saw the introduction of the modern
(Fig. 18) – built from 1497 to oppose the French, this                 fortress with bastions. Italian engineers in particular
is quadrangular and low lying with bastions – though                   were hired all over Europe to plan modern fortresses
not pentagonal – for guns, very thick walls, a caponi-                 with bastion systems as at Navarrenx (Fig. 20) built in
er, outworks: it is a genuine forerunner of later designs              the Pyrenees by an engineer from Verona in the 1530s,
despite clinging onto a tall donjon for the governor.44                and in the 2nd half of the 17th century also in Peitz in
     In 1500, there were fortresses with pentagonal bas-               Brandenburg by Francesco Chiaramella around 1560,
tions attached, but none were yet integrated into an                   and later – 1590 – Rocco Conte di Linari at Küstrin
overall design. The nearest probably are the works to                  (Kostrzyn).
strengthen Rhodes after the failed Ottoman siege of 1480                   There is much more detail to add and many more
(Fig. 19). The bastions of Rhodes are of different shapes              questions to pose and to answer, this paper has merely
and sizes, and as important perhaps were the steps to cre-             proposed the key turning points over a period of almost
ate outworks shielding the medieval walls, the thick-                  two centuries in which artillery, and fortifications, were
ening of those walls, an enormous ditch and the cre-                   transformed forever from the medieval to the early
ation of gun platforms to keep an enemy at distance.45                 modern world.
Bibliography
    43 
         Santoro 1994, 33-38; Deanović 1979, 275-290; Karaman 2003.
    44 
         Bayrou et al. 1998, passim.
     45 
         Gabriel 1921, passim; Migos 1980, passim; Kollias 1998,
passim; Spiteri 2001.
                                                                                                                               99
                                   CHRISTOF KRAUSKOPF, PETER PURTON
Lemcke H. 1911. Die Baudenkmäler der Provinz Pommern 3. Die Bau- und Kunstdenkmäler des Regierungsbe-
    zirks Köslin. 2,2. Die Kreise Bütow und Lauenburg. Stettin.
MUB 1907 – Mecklenburgisches Urkundenbuch. Vol. 22, 1391-1395. Schwerin.
Mesqui J. 1997. Châteaux forts et fortifications en France. Paris.
Meyer W. 1981. Burgen von A bis Z – Burgenlexikon der Regio. Basel.
Meyer W. 2009. Bollwerk und Zwinger. Wehrtechnische Neuerungen im Burgenbau des 15./16. Jahrhunderts.
    In: B. Scholkmann, S. Frommer, Ch. Vossler, M. Wolf (eds.), Zwischen Tradition und Wandel: Archäologie
    des 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts. Tübinger Forschungen zur historischen Archäologie 3. Büchenbach, 237-249.
Migos A. 1990. Rhodes: the Knights’ battleground. “Fort” 18, 5-28.
O’Neil B. H. St. John 1960. Castles and Cannon. A Study of Early Artillery Fortifications in England. Oxford.
Ottersbach C., Wagner H., Wöllper J. 2014. Festungen in Baden-Württemberg. Regensburg.
Ottersbach C. 2015. Türme, Kaponnieren und Bastionen. Flankierungselemente der mittelalterlichen Burg in Mit-
    teleuropa. In: J. Zeune (ed.), Dem Feind zum Trutz. Wehrelemente an mittelalterlichen Burgen. Braubach,
    189-204.
Pospieszny K. 2007: Plauen-Bollwerk. Die frühe Pulverwaffenfortifikation der Marienburg in Preußen. “Castella
    Maris Baltici“ 8, 141-150.
Purton P. 2010. A History of the Late Medieval Siege. Woodbridge.
Purton P. 2018. The Medieval Military Engineer. From the Roman Empire to the Sixteenth Century. Woodbridge.
Renn D. F. 1968. The Earliest Gunports in Britain? “Archaeological Journal” 125, 301-303.
Renn D. 1982. Gun Loops. In: S. S. Frere, S. Towe (eds.), The Archaeology of Canterbury 2: Excavations on the
    Roman and Medieval Defences of Cunterbury. Maidstone, 117-118.
Salm J. 2011. Die polnischen Burgen im 15. Jahrhundert. In: J. Zeune (ed.), Die Burg im 15. Jahrhundert. Brau-
    bach, 148-154.
Santoro R. 1994. Architetti italiani operandi alla defesa della stato dei ‘cavalieri di Rodi (Ordine di San Giovanni
    Gerosolamitano, ovvere ‘Ospitalieri’). In: M. Viganò (ed.), Architetti e ingegneri militari italiani all’estero dal
    XV al XVIII secolo 1. “Castella” 44, 33-38.
Saunders A. 2000. Southampton: the Introduction of Gunpowder Artillery to the Town’s Defences. “Europa Nostra
    Bulletin” 53, 53-58.
Spiteri S. C. 2001. Fortresses of the Knights. Malta.
Schmaedecke M. 2005. Die Ruine Farnsburg, Die Sanierung 2002 und 2003 sowie Beobachtungen zur Bauges-
    chichte und zu früheren Sanierungen. Archäologie und Museum 49. Liestal.
Schicht P. 2003. Österreichs Kastellburgen des 13. und 14. Jahrhunderts. Wien.
Strickhausen G., Strickhausen-Bode N. 2015. Burg Trendelburg – eine innovative Festung des 15. Jahrhunderts.
    “Denkmalpflege und Kulturgeschichte 2015 (2), 28-36.
Uhl S., Zeune J. 1999. Schildmauern. In: H.-W. Böhme, B. von der Dollen, D. Kerber, B. Schock-Werner, J. Zeune
    (eds.), Burgen in Mitteleuropa 1. Stuttgart, 231-234.
Tatton-Brown T. 1985. The West Gate. Canterbury. Canterbury Archaeological Trust.
Varhaník J. 1997. Kotnovská věž v Táboře. “Průzkumy památek” 4(2), 51-56.
Varhaník J. 1998. Husitské opevnĕní hradu Orlíka nad Vltavou. “Průzkumy památek” 5, 13-32.
Verdier P. 1939. La rocca d’Ostie dans l’architecture militaire du Quatrocentro. “Mélanges de l‘école française de
    Rome: Italie et Méditerranée” 56, 280-331.
Zeune J. 2011. Frühe Artilleriebefestigungen der Zeit um 1420/30 in Bayern. In: J. Zeune (ed.), Die Burg im
    15. Jahrhundert. Braubach, 74-88.
Zeune J. (ed.) 2011. Die Burg im 15. Jahrhundert. Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Burgenvereinigung Reihe B,
    Schriften 12. Braubach.
101