Pebbles and Sand On Asteroid (162173) Ryugu: in Situ Observation and Particles Returned To Earth
Pebbles and Sand On Asteroid (162173) Ryugu: in Situ Observation and Particles Returned To Earth
A
low tensile strength of a few hundred kilo-
steroids are small celestial bodies in the are predicted to contain a record of Solar Sys- pascals (12). Similarly low thermal inertia
Solar System that are left over from the tem evolution (1). Evidence for ongoing activity (~300 J m−2 K−1 s−1/2) was measured for seve-
planet formation process. The C-type (car- on an asteroid surface, including movement ral large (>10 m) boulders and their surround-
bonaceous) group of asteroids appear and ejection of particles, has previously been ings (13). An artificial impact experiment was
to be related to carbonaceous chondrite inferred from analysis of particles returned to performed by using Hayabusa2’s Small Carry-
meteorites, which are known to contain hy- Earth from the S-type (stony) asteroid (25143) on Impactor (SCI), which showed that Ryugu’s
drated silicates and organic matter (1). Such Itokawa (2, 3). surface is composed of a cohesionless material,
hydrated asteroids could have delivered water The Hayabusa2 spacecraft investigated the at least in part (14). Infrared observations of
and organic molecules to Earth during or after C-type near-Earth asteroid (162173) Ryugu from the SCI-made crater have shown that the
its formation. Samples from C-type asteroids June 2018 to November 2019, with the goal subsurface material has spectral properties
1
UTokyo Organization for Planetary and Space Science–Department of Earth and Planetary Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. 2Institute of Space and Astronautical
Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan. 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.
4
Biogeochemistry Research Center, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan. 5Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
113-0032, Japan. 6Department of Planetology, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan. 7Université Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Centre national de la recherche scientifique,
Laboratoire Lagrange, F-06304 Nice CEDEX 4, France. 8Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85705, USA. 9Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.
10
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan. 11Department of Earth Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan. 12Division of Earth
and Planetary Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 13Department of Earth and Planetary Systems Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan. 14Research
Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu 525-8577, Japan. 15Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
16
Polar Science Resources Center, National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo 190-8518, Japan. 17Planetary Exploration Research Center, Chiba Institute of Technology, Narashino 275-0016,
Japan. 18JAXA Space Exploration Center, JAXA, Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan. 19Department of Information Science, Kochi University, Kochi 780-8520, Japan. 20Department of Physics, Rikkyo
University, Tokyo 171-8501, Japan. 21Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, University of La Laguna, E-38205 Tenerife, Spain. 22Information Technology and Human Factors, National Institute of
Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan. 23Department of Physics, Meiji University, Kawasaki 214-8571, Japan. 24Aizu Research Center for Space Informatics,
University of Aizu, Aizu-Wakamatsu 965-8580, Japan. 25Marine Works Japan Ltd., Yokosuka 237-0063, Japan. 26Department of Economics, Toyo University, Tokyo 112-8606, Japan. 27Department
of Space and Astronautical Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Hayama 240-0193, Japan. 28School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of
Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. 29Department of Geology, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA. 30Research and Development Directorate, JAXA, Sagamihara
252-5210, Japan. 31Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. 32Université de Lorraine, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Centre de
Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, F-54000 Nancy, France. 33National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka 181-8588, Japan. 34Department of Astronomical Science, The
Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Hayama 240-0193, Japan. 35Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kindai University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-2116, Japan. 36NASA Johnson
Space Center, Houston, TX 77058, USA. 37Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015, USA. 38Department of Science, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan. 39Department of
Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK. 40NEC Corporation, Tokyo 183-8501, Japan. 41Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences,
Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan. 42Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
*Corresponding author. Email: tachi@eps.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp †Deceased. ‡Present address: CS Group, 31506 Toulouse CEDEX 5, France. §Present address: Laboratoire d’Etudes Spatiales et d’Instrumentation en
Astrophysique, Observatoire de Paris, 92195 Meudon, France. ¶Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kanagawa Institute of Technology, Kanagawa 243-0292, Japan.
similar to, but distinct from, those of the sur- The TD2 location hosts fine particle aggre- should access greater depths; nevertheless, we
face (15). The crater and excavated material gates, observed on the surface of a smooth expect the samples collected during TD2 to
have a slightly higher abundance of hydrated type 2 boulder (Fig. 2A), which were not iden- include some SCI ejecta. Spectroscopy of the
silicates, reflecting the extent of aqueous al- tified in proximity images of TD1 or other SCI crater and its surroundings revealed only
teration that occurred on Ryugu’s parent plan- surface locations (6). These particles did not small differences (15), so the identification of
etesimal (15). strongly adhere to the boulder, being blown subsurface materials in the collected sample
off by the subsequent ascent thruster firing requires other analysis methods.
Sample-collection operations (Fig. 2B). We infer that the fine particles are During both landings, the motions of par-
Hayabusa2 made its first landing [designated geologically recent and, most likely, ejecta from ticles kicked up by the sample projectiles and
touchdown one (TD1)] on 2019 February 21, the SCI crater. Images of the impact event show thruster firings were observed with a small
during which it collected samples of the sur- that part of the ejecta curtain fell back on monitor camera head (CAM-H) (Fig. 3 and
face (6). The second landing (TD2) occurred Ryugu’s surface, with simulations predicting movie S1) (20). One second after the projectile
on 2019 July 11, close to the crater made by that the TD2 site was covered with SCI ejecta firing at TD1, ~10 particles were identified
the SCI, to collect impact ejecta, i.e., sub- excavated from a depth of ~1 m below the beneath or nearby the sampler horn (Fig. 3C).
surface samples (Fig. 1). The two landing surface (18, 19). The estimated sizes of ejecta After another second, the number of particles
locations appeared similar in remote imag- particles range from 1 mm to several decimeters increased to ~20 in the next image (Fig. 3D), of
ing, being covered with boulders and pebbles (18). This is consistent with the observed par- which 3 particles were moving toward CAM-H.
(Fig. 1). The two types of boulder commonly ticles on the boulder (Fig. 3). We conclude We estimate the ejection angle and velocity of
observed on Ryugu’s surface [rugged type 1 that the TD2 sample location was covered these particles as ~50° to 60° and 1 to 2 m s−1,
and smooth type 2 (5)] are found at both with ejecta excavated from Ryugu’s subsurface respectively (20). Their ejection angle is within
locations. In both landing operations, a 5-g by the SCI experiment. Sample-collection analog the range measured in projectile experiments
tantalum projectile was fired through the experiments that were performed in Earth grav- in Earth gravity (40° to 60°; fig. S2) (20) and
sampler horn at ~300 ± 30 m s−1 (1, 16, 17) ity indicate that ~50% of the collected particles consistent with the most frequent angle range
when the horn touched the surface, lifting were taken from depths <1.5 mm from the sur- (48° to 54°) in the Hayabusa2 sampling sim-
material into the collector. face (fig. S3) (20). Collection under microgravity ulations (21). We conclude that these particles
are ejecta produced by the projectile impact. during TD2 was similar to the amount collected pebbles as well. Numerous millimeter-sized
The ejected particles identified near the rocket during TD1. particles were also observed during the TD2
coupling ring (an assembly used during the ascent operation (Fig. 4), which indicates the
spacecraft launch) were centimeter-sized (Fig. 3). Spacecraft ascent presence of more small particles at the TD2
Centimeter-sized pebbles were also found in CAM-H continued to take images of flying location than at the TD1 location, which were
proximity images of the TD1 site (6) and at particles during the ascent after the two land- presumably the SCI ejecta.
different surface locations observed by the ing operations (Fig. 4). Flying particles are The flying pebbles show two morpholog-
lander MASCOT (11) and the MINERVA-II visible as objects moving relative to the sur- ical types: rugged particles and particles
(Micro Nano Experimental Robot Vehicle for face in multiple sequential images (movies S1 with smooth faces (Fig. 4 and fig. S4). These
Asteroid 2) Rover-1A (Fig. 2). The data from and S2). Because no such flying particles were two types are consistent with the morpho-
MINERVA-II Rover-1A also showed centimeter- observed during the spacecraft descent, we logical variations that were observed within
sized particles that were disturbed by its hop interpret these particles as ejecta either due surface boulders observed by the spacecraft
across the surface (Fig. 2D) (20). This suggests to the projectile impact or lifted by the space- (5) and the MASCOT lander (11). We deter-
that centimeter-sized pebbles, which do not craft thruster firing. Images from a wide-angle mined the three-dimensional shapes of fly-
strongly adhere to larger cobbles and boulders, optical navigation camera showed boulders ing pebbles for those visible in multiple
are present over the surface of Ryugu. moving on the surface because of the thruster two-dimensional projections (from different
We estimate the total mass of the three ejecta operation during TD1 (6), so we infer that the angles) in the CAM-H images. We define L
particles observed in Fig. 3 as 0.3 to 3 g, assum- thruster triggered the ejection of most of the and I as the maximum and minimum caliper
ing spherical particles with a diameter of 0.5 to
1 cm and bulk density of ~2 g cm−3. If all the
ejecta particles in Fig. 3 (~20 in number) have
the same ejection velocity as the three par-
ticles observed moving toward CAM-H, the total
amount of ejecta with an ejection velocity of
~1 m s−1 would be ~2 to 20 g. Numerical sim-
ulations of the Hayabusa2 sample process,
which assume a cohesionless granular bed
consisting of grains with an average diameter
of 0.5 cm, predicted that the total ejecta mass
is about an order of magnitude larger than
the mass of ejecta with a velocity of ~1 m s−1
(21). We therefore estimate the total ejecta
Fig. 3. CAM-H images of the TD1 and TD2 sample acquisition processes. (A to F) TD1 operation. The Samples returned to Earth
lower left of each panel indicates the time t from projectile firing, ranging from −1 to +4 s. Ejecta particles are Hayabusa2 left Ryugu in November 2019. On
visible after t = 0. A reflection plate for a laser range finder (23 mm by 23 mm) on the sampler horn 6 December 2020, the reentry capsule contain-
and the rim of the rocket coupling ring (4 mm; distance between arrows) are labeled as size references. ing the samples was delivered to Woomera,
The white arrows in (D) and (E) indicate the same group of particles moving toward CAM-H. (G to South Australia. After transfer to a clean room,
L) Equivalent images of TD2. Three particles, indicated with white arrows in (J), are also seen as mirror the sample chambers were opened and found
images reflected on the rocket coupling ring (red arrows). to contain ~5 g of material (31). This is ~50 times
more than the mission minimum requirement
of 0.1 g (1, 16). The samples recovered from
lengths—the distance between two parallel lines to longest axis (S/L) and intermediate axis to chamber A (24 cm3) of the sample catcher,
tangential to the surface—of the maximum-area longest axis (I/L) ratios of the particles (Fig. 4 which was used for the storage of TD1 sam-
projection of each particle and S as the smallest and tables S1 and S2) show that there is a ples, weigh ~3 g. This mass is consistent with
dimension measured in the minimum-area fraction of elongated block-like flat particles the estimate above based on CAM-H images.
projection (fig. S5) (20, 22). The shortest axis on the surface. The 67 particles have a bimodal We therefore conclude that the sample in
chamber A was lifted by the projectile firing, of the sample container, millimeter-sized sand abusa2 sampler (16, 21). The presence of these
which worked efficiently to collect asteroid and nearly centimeter-sized pebbles were found, large pebbles in chamber C, despite the smaller
surface regolith. This is unlike the particles along with submillimeter-sized fine powder. The total mass, can be explained either by projectile
returned from the asteroid Itokawa by the grain size variation is consistent with expec- destruction of a larger rock or the scoop-up
original Hayabusa spacecraft, as its projec- tations derived from the surface observation by component of the sampler horn, which was
tile failed to fire, which complicated in- the MASCOT lander (11), MINERVA-II rovers, designed to pick up surface pebbles (16).
terpretation of the samples (2). Chamber C Hayabusa2 cameras (Figs. 2 to 4), and polari- Millimeter-sized fine grains and submillimeter-
(12 cm3) of the sample catcher, which was metric observations from Earth (32). All the sized sand particles were also found in cham-
used for samples from TD2, contained ~2 g. particles in the two chambers appeared black ber C, which are likely to include subsurface
This is also consistent with the estimate (Fig. 6), which is consistent with the color and material, as observed on a boulder (Fig. 2A).
above from the CAM-H images, which sug- albedo of Ryugu’s boulders (5, 6). The sizes of Chamber B, which was not used for either
gests that chamber C samples are also the the collected particles are consistent with the landing operation, is located between chambers
ejecta from the projectile firing. Unlike TD1, ejecta observed during each landing operation A and C. A small number of fine particles
the TD2 sample likely includes material from (Fig. 3). The largest grains from chamber A are (smaller than 1 mm) were found in this cham-
the subsurface that was excavated by the SCI ~5 mm in size, whereas there are three pebbles ber. This shows that no extensive mixing of
impact. larger than 5 mm from chamber C (Fig. 6 and particles occurred through the gaps between
We compare the properties of the returned table S3). The longest dimension of the largest the chambers during the return to Earth or
particles to the constraints derived above from pebble in chamber C is 10.3 mm, which is close capsule recovery (16). We are therefore confi-
the sample collection images. In both chambers to the maximum size obtainable by the Hay- dent that the pebbles and sand in chambers A
sample (Fig. 6) have S/L and I/L ratios (Fig. 5B) 31. T. Yada et al., Nat. Astron. 10.1038/s41550-021-01550-6
that are consistent with those of the flying par- (2021).
32. D. Kuroda et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 911, L24 (2021).
ticles observed at Ryugu (Fig. 5A). 33. G. Libourel et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500, 1905–1920
Many returned particles feature curved and (2021).
straight cracks. Pebbles with a smooth surface
AC KNOWLED GME NTS
could be fragments of particles with straight Hayabusa2 was developed and built under the leadership of JAXA,
cracks, possibly formed by shock or thermal with contributions from the German Aerospace Center and the
fatigue (33). The common presence of cracks Centre National d’Études Spatiales (CNES) and in collaboration
with NASA and other universities, institutes, and companies in
in returned pebbles implies that the small
Japan. The sampler system was developed by JAXA, The University
thermal inertia of surface boulders (12, 13) is of Tokyo, Hokkaido University, Kyushu University, Japan Agency
probably due, at least in part, to cracks or for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, and other universities,
fractures in their interior. Microcracks or institutes, and companies in Japan. Funding: S. Tachibana
acknowledges JSPS KAKENHI Grant (JP 20H05846). S.W.
microporosity could also be responsible for acknowledges JSPS KAKENHI Grant (17H06459 and 19H01951).
the low thermal inertia. P.M., B.M., Y.Z., F. Thuillet, and G.L. acknowledge the French space
The color, shape, surface morphology, and agency CNES. P.M. and Y.Z. acknowledge funding from the
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
structure of the returned pebbles and sand under grant agreement no. 870377 (project NEO-MAPP), from
match those of Ryugu’s surface material ob- the Université Côte d’Azur “Individual grants for young researchers”
served from the spacecraft. We therefore con- program and from Academies of Excellence: Complex Systems and
Space, Environment, Risk, and Resilience, part of the IDEX JEDI of
clude that the pebbles and sand inside chambers Université Côte d’Azur. B.M. acknowledges funding from the
A and C are representative samples of Ryugu at European Research Council (grant agreement no. 695618). Author
two surface sites, without substantial alteration contributions: S. Tachibana. coordinated coauthor contributions; led
the sampler development with H. Sawada; performed data analyses,
during the sample collection and return to and interpretations; and wrote the paper, with contributions from
Earth. The variations in physical properties H. Sawada, R.O., Y. Takano, K. Sakamoto, and H. Yano. Sampler
among the pebbles and sand, which were development and operation: H. Sawada, R.O., Y. Takano.,
K. Sakamoto, Y.N.M., C.O., H. Yano, S.Y., T. Noguchi, T. Nakamura,
not expected before spacecraft arrival at the
A.T., N.I., K. Kurosawa, and A.M.N.; CAM-H operation: H. Sawada
asteroid, reflect the geological history of and K.O.; ONC data acquisition and reduction: S. Sugita, R.H.,
Ryugu (1). T. Morota, Y. Iijima, S. Kameda, H. Sawada, E.T., C. Honda, Y. Yokota,
M. Yamada, T. Kouyama, N.S., K.O., H. Suzuki, K. Yoshioka, M.H.,
Y.C., M.I., A. Miura, and M.M.; MINERVA-II rovers operation:
T. Yoshimitsu, T. Kubota, and H.D.; capsule retrieval operation and
RE FERENCES AND NOTES curation: S.N., M.F., T. Yamada, T.R.I., H. Sawada, R.O., K. Sakamoto,
1. S. Tachibana et al., Geochem. J. 48, 571–587 (2014). Y. Takano, Y.N.M., H. Yano, M.N., K. Yogata, A.N., M. Yoshitake, A.I.S.,
2. A. Tsuchiyama et al., Science 333, 1125–1128 (2011). S.F., K.H., A. Miyazaki, K. Kumagai, T.O., M. Abe, H. Yurimoto, T.U.,
Science (ISSN ) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20005. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim
to original U.S. Government Works