PROJECT SCENARIO
GOGREEN
SUBTOPIC ECOLOGICAL COMPANIES
INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS
SELF-ASSESSMENT
DEADLINE 1st OF FEBRUARY
SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the relevant
boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher scores the students
and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of Excellence.
Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a separate
folder/separate tab.
Fill in first names of students
Name of the school PAWAR PUBLIC SCHOOL, CHANDIVALI
Tanisi
Group leader
Kaavya
Student 1
Saiesh
Student 2
Aarya
Student 3
-
Student 4
10
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N
Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly Y 5
layout presented
- Research is divided into different
parts
- All documents are visible
- Multiple features of Weebly have
been used
Group 5p - The group has a short and Y 5
introduction attractive written/video introduction
- A group photo/camera shot is
added
- Personal information is shared
(hobbies, etc.)
- In case the group used a YouTube
video, ‘Eumind’ is included in the
title
Research 10p - Sufficient people were interviewed Y 10
methods
- A good summary of the answers
of the interviews is included (200-
300 words per interview)
Interviews and 30p - How good is the quality of the Y 30
investigations research?
- Did you answer all the questions?
SDG activity 5p - Was the SDG activity carried out? Y 5
- How well was the SDG activity
carried out?
11
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N
Conclusion 5p - Is there a clear answer to the main Y 5
research question?
- How good is the quality of the
conclusion?
Documentation 5p - Has the research been Y 5
documented in pictures/videos?
Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is Y 10
communication added
Pictures of Zoom/WhatsApp
Reflection on Video
Conferences is added
Comparison 10p - Is there a good comparison on the Y, (not 9
similarities and differences between satisfact
the schools? ory)
Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the Y 15
reflection?
- Has each student written an
individual reflection?
Total 100p 99
12
Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?
Please explain your ideas concisely.
It would be ideal if in the next project more regular checks between the
counterparts could be conducted in order to keep a track of each other’s
processes and to facilitate better communication.
13
SELF-ASSESSMENT
DEADLINE 1st OF FEBRUARY
SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the relevant
boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher scores the students
and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of Excellence.
Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a separate
folder/separate tab.
Fill in first names of students
Name of the school
Group leader
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N
Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly
layout presented
- Research is divided into 4 parts
- All documents are visible in the
article
- Multiple features of Weebly have
been used
Group 5p - The group has a short and
introduction attractive written/video introduction
- A group photo/camera shot is
added
- Personal information is shared
(hobbies, etc.)
- In case the group used a YouTube
video, ‘Eumind’ is included in the
title
Research 15p - Sufficient people were interviewed
methods
- The investigation among students
was carried out
- A good summary of the answers
of each interview is included (200-
words per interview)
- Some (parts of) answers are video
recorded
- Subtitles are added
10
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N
Interviews 25p - How good is the quality of the
research?
- Has your group given an
explanation of the units of energy
and power in your Weebly and used
them correctly?
Conclusion 5p - Is there a clear answer to the main
research question?
- How good is the quality of the
conclusion?
Documentation 10p - Has the research been
documented in pictures/videos?
Pictures: minimum 6
Videos: no more than 3
minutes
- Are graphs clearly presented?
Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is
communication added
Pictures of Zoom/WhatsApp
Reflection on Video
Conferences is added
Comparison 10p - Is there a good comparison on the
similarities and differences between
the organizations?
Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the
reflection?
- Has each student written an
individual reflection?
Total 100p
11
Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?
Please explain your ideas concisely.
12
PROJECT SCENARIO
GOGREEN
SUBTOPIC SAVING FOOD
INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS
SELF-ASSESSMENT
DEADLINE 1st OF FEBRUARY
SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the relevant
boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher scores the students
and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of Excellence.
Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a separate
folder/separate tab.
Fill in first names of students
Name of the school
Group leader
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
14
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N
ttractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly
layout presented
- Research is divided into different
parts
- All documents are visible
- Multiple features of Weebly have
been used
Group 5p - The group has a short and
introduction attractive written/video introduction
- A group photo/camera shot is
added
- Personal information is shared
(hobbies, etc.)
- In case the group used a YouTube
video, ‘Eumind’ is included in the
title
Research 15p - Sufficient people were interviewed
methods
- Some (parts of) answers are video
recorded
- Subtitles are added
- Did you answer all the questions?
15
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N
Interviews and 25p - How good is the quality of the
investigations research?
- A good summary of the answers
of the interviews is included (200-
words per interview)
- All the worksheets were filled out
and added to Weebly
- A good summary of the results of
the diaries is included
Conclusion 5p - Is there a clear answer to the main
research question?
- How good is the quality of the
conclusion?
Documentation 10p - Has the research been
documented in pictures/videos?
Pictures: minimum 6
Videos: no more than 3
minutes
Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is
communication added
Pictures of Zoom/WhatsApp
Reflection on Video
Conferences is added
Comparison 10p - Is there a good comparison on the
similarities and differences between
the countries?
Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the
reflection?
- Has each student written an
individual reflection?
Total 100p
Awareness Bonus - Was the awareness activity carried
activity 5p out?
16
Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?
Please explain your ideas concisely.
17
PROJECT SCENARIO
GOGREEN
SUBTOPIC WASTE MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS
SELF-ASSESSMENT
DEADLINE 1st OF FEBRUARY
SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the relevant
boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher scores the students
and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of Excellence.
Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a separate
folder/separate tab.
Fill in first names of students
Name of the school
Group leader
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
11
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N
Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly
layout presented
- Research is divided into different
parts
- All documents are visible in the
article
- Multiple features of Weebly have
been used
Group 5p - The group has a short and
introduction attractive written/video introduction
- A group photo/camera shot is
added
- Personal information is shared
(hobbies, etc.)
- In case the group used a YouTube
video, ‘Eumind’ is included in the
title
Research 15p - Sufficient people were interviewed
methods
- The investigation among students
was carried out
- A good summary of the answers
of each interview is included (200-
words per interview)
- Some (parts of) answers are video
recorded
- Subtitles are added
12
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N
Interviews and 30p - How good is the quality of the
investigations research?
- Have you answered all of the
questions?
- Have you thought of at least 2
methods to reduce the amount of
rubbish in school?
Conclusion 5p - Is there a clear answer to the main
research question?
- How good is the quality of the
conclusion?
Documentation 10p - Has the research been
documented in pictures/videos?
Pictures: minimum 6
Videos: no more than 3
minutes
- Are graphs clearly presented?
Evidence of 5p - Evidence of communication is
communication added
Pictures of Zoom/WhatsApp
Reflection on Video
Conferences is added
Comparison 10p - Is there a good comparison on the
similarities and differences between
the schools?
Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the
reflection?
- Has each student written an
individual reflection?
Total 100p
Awareness Bonus - Have you carried out the
activity 5p awareness activity?
13
Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?
Please explain your ideas concisely.
14
