0% found this document useful (0 votes)
224 views7 pages

Calculation of Inductors

The document discusses the calculation of inductors. It provides formulas for calculating the inductance of straight wires, coils, and solenoids. It also discusses factors that affect inductance such as the number of turns in a coil. The document concludes by giving examples of calculating inductance values for different circuit elements.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
224 views7 pages

Calculation of Inductors

The document discusses the calculation of inductors. It provides formulas for calculating the inductance of straight wires, coils, and solenoids. It also discusses factors that affect inductance such as the number of turns in a coil. The document concludes by giving examples of calculating inductance values for different circuit elements.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Calculation of inductors

Any current-carrying conductor creates a magnetic field around itself. The


ratio of the magnetic flux of this field to the current that generates it is called
inductance. The inductance of a straight piece of conductor is small and
amounts to 1 ... 2 μH per meter of length, depending on the diameter of the
wire (thin conductors have a large inductance). More accurate results are
given by the formula

where is the length of the wire; d is its diameter. Both sizes must be taken in
meters (under the sign of the logarithm it is permissible in any, but the same
units), the inductance will turn out in microhenry. To facilitate calculations, we
recall that the natural logarithm of any number is 2,3 times the decimal
logarithm (which can be found using tables, a slide rule or a calculator), i.e.
Inx \u2,3d XNUMXlgx.

Why did we give this formula? Let's explain with an example.

Let the conclusions of some radio element have a length of 4 cm with a


diameter of 0,4 mm. Let's calculate their inductance:

2,3lg100 = 4,6 and 0,2-0,04-3,6 = 0,03 (round off).

So, the inductance of each pin is close to 0,03 uH, and the inductance of the
two pins is 0,06 uH. With a capacitance of only 4,5 pF (and the mounting
capacitance can be more), this inductance forms an oscillatory circuit tuned to
a frequency of 300 MHz - remember Thomson's formula:

f = 1/2π√LC.

That is why on VHF it is impossible to carry out installation with long wires and
leave long leads of parts.

To increase the inductance, the conductor is folded into a ring. The magnetic
flux inside the ring increases, and the inductance becomes about three times
larger:

L = 0,27πD(ln8D/d-2).
Here D is the diameter of the ring, the dimensions are the same. A further
increase in inductance occurs with an increase in the number of turns, while
the magnetic fluxes of individual turns not only add up, but also affect all other
turns. Therefore, the inductance increases with the square of the number of
turns. If there are N turns in the coil, the inductance obtained for one turn must
be multiplied by N2.

For a single-layer cylindrical coil with a length much greater than the diameter
D (Fig. 23), the inductance is calculated quite accurately by the formula

strictly derived for a very long solenoid or torus. All dimensions here are in the
SI system (meters, Henry), μ0 = 4π 10-7 H/m - magnetic constant; S = πD2/4
- cross-sectional area of the coil; μ - effective magnetic permeability of the
magnetic circuit. For open magnetic circuits, it is much less than the
permeability of the material itself. For example, for a magnetic antenna rod
made of ferrite grade 600NN (magnetic permeability 600) and barely reaches
150. If there is no magnetic circuit, μ = 1.

This formula gives very accurate results for toroidal coils, and corresponds
to the circumference of the annular magnetic circuit, measured along its
center line. The formula is also suitable for low-frequency transformers wound
on a W-shaped magnetic core (Fig. 24).
In this case, S = ab is the cross-sectional area of the magnetic circuit, and -
this is the average length of the magnetic field line, shown in the figure by the
dotted line. For closed magnetic circuits assembled without a gap, as for
ferrite rings, and is taken equal to the magnetic permeability of the material. A
small gap slightly reduces μ. Its influence can be taken into account by
increasing the length of the magnetic field line by δμ, where δ is the gap
width, μ is the magnetic permeability of the core material.

As you can see, the inductance practically does not depend on the diameter
of the wire. For low-frequency coils, the wire diameter is selected based on
the allowable current density, for copper conductors 2 ... 3 amperes per mm2
of conductor cross section. In other cases, especially with RF coils, the goal is
to achieve a minimum conductor resistance in order to increase the quality
factor (the ratio of inductive to active resistance).

To this end, it would seem that the diameter of the wire should be increased,
but then the length of the winding increases, which reduces the inductance,
and with a close, multilayer arrangement of the turns, the effect of "displacing"
the current from the winding is observed, which increases the resistance. The
effect is similar to current displacement at high frequencies in any conductors,
whereby the current flows only in a thin skin layer near the surface of the
conductor. The skin layer thickness decreases and the wire resistance
increases in proportion to the square root of the frequency.

Thus, to obtain the desired inductance and quality factor, it is not at all
necessary to choose the thickest wire. For example, if a single-layer coil (see
Fig. 23) is wound with a thick wire turn to turn or twice as thin as a wire, but
with a step equal to the diameter of the wire, the inductance will remain the
same and the quality factor will hardly decrease. The quality factor increases
with the increase along with the diameter of the wire of all sizes of the coil,
mainly its diameter.

To obtain the maximum quality factor and inductance, it is more advantageous


to make the coil short, but large in diameter, with the ratio D/ about 2,5. The
inductance of such coils is more accurately calculated by the empirical
(selected empirically) formula

, where the dimensions are taken in centimeters, and the inductance is


obtained in microhenries. It is curious that the same formula is applicable to a
spiral or basket flat coil (Fig. 25).

As D take the average diameter:

D = (Dmax + Dmin)/2

but as - winding width,

= (Dmax - Dmin)/2.
The inductance of a multilayer coreless coil (Fig. 26) is calculated by the
formula

where the dimensions are substituted in centimeters, and the inductance is


obtained in microhenries. With a dense ordinary winding, the quality factor
does not exceed 30 ... 50, "loose" winding (bulk, universal) gives high values
of the quality factor. Even better is the "cellular" winding, now almost
forgotten. At frequencies up to 10 MHz, the quality factor increases when
using a litz wire - a wire twisted from many thin insulated veins. The litz wire
has a larger total wire surface, through which, in fact, the current flows due to
the skin effect, and therefore, there is less resistance at high frequency.

A magnetodielectric trimmer increases the inductance up to 2-3 times,


depending on the size of the trimmer. An even greater increase in inductance
is provided by closed or partially closed magnetic circuits, for example, pot-
shaped ones. In this case, it is better to use the strict formula for the solenoid
or torus (see above). The quality factor of a coil on a closed magnetic circuit is
determined not so much by the wire as by losses in the core material.

At the end of the chapter, we present some useful formulas for calculating the
active resistance of wires. The linear resistance (per meter of length) of a
copper wire at direct current and low frequencies (Ohm / m) is easy to find by
the formula

FL = 0,0223/d2,

where d is the wire diameter, mm. Skin thickness for copper (mm) is
approximately 1/15√f (MHz). Please note: already at a frequency of 1 MHz,
the current penetrates the wire to a depth of only 0,07 mm! In the case when
the wire diameter is larger than the skin layer thickness, the resistance
increases in comparison with the DC resistance. The linear resistance of the
wire at high frequency is estimated by the formula

R = √f/12d (mm).

Unfortunately, these formulas cannot be used to determine the active


resistance of the coils, because due to the effect of the proximity of the turns,
it turns out even more.

It is time to give answers to the first tasks given in the previous sections.
Problem from introduction of ("Radio", 2002, No. 9, p. 52): what is the duration
of unit pulses (with respect to the period) at the output of the logic element
(Fig. 2), if it switches at a voltage of 2 V, and a sinusoidal signal with
amplitude 4 V?

It is easier and clearer to solve this problem graphically - it is necessary to


draw a sinusoid with an amplitude of 4 V as accurately as possible and draw a
straight horizontal line at the level of the switching threshold of the element,
i.e. 2 V (Fig. 27).

The element will switch at the times corresponding to the points of intersection
of the sinusoid with this line. The duration of the resulting pulses (marked with
thick lines) can now be measured with a ruler - it will be 1/3 of the period.

On the horizontal axis of the graph, it is advisable to postpone not the time,
but the phase of the oscillation φ. The full period is 360° and the switching
times are found from the equation 4sinφ = 2 or sinφ =1/2 (it equates the
instantaneous voltage value to the switching threshold). Solutions to the
equation: φ = 30°, 150°, etc. The phase difference between the switching
moments is 150 - 30 = 120°, the pulse duration with respect to the period will
be 120/360 = 1/3. Thus, the problem can be solved algebraically, but it is easy
to get confused in the multivalued solution of the equation for φ, so drawing a
graph turned out to be very useful. Even if you do not try to draw the graph
accurately, we will get an approximate estimate from it, and from the solution
of an algebraic equation - an exact result.

Now the second problem suggested at the end of the first section: Battery
measurements showed an EMF of 12 V and a short circuit current of 0,4 A.
Which light bulb should I take so that the light is as bright as possible?
Determine the internal resistance of the battery:

r \u3d E / lK12 \u0,4d 30 / XNUMX \uXNUMXd XNUMX Ohms.

In order for the light to be as bright as possible, maximum power must be


released on the lamp bulb (not voltage, and not current, but power, which is
then converted into heat: Q \u6d P t). This happens when the load resistance
is equal to the internal resistance of the source: R \u0,2d g. Of all the listed
bulbs, only one satisfies this condition - we find its resistance according to
Ohm's law: 30 V / 6 A \u0,2d XNUMX Ohm. She will be the brightest. Note
also that a voltage of XNUMX V will be released on it and a current of XNUMX
A will flow, i.e., the lamp will shine in the mode recommended for it.

Author: V.Polyakov, Moscow

You might also like