Hydrothermal Co-Carbonization
Hydrothermal Co-Carbonization
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Editor: Apostolos Giannis                                  Attempts to prepare high-grade and clean solid fuels from biowastes and low-rank coals are essential for pro
                                                           tecting the environment and utilizing the energy from low-grade resources. The improvement of hydrothermal
Keywords:                                                  carbonization (HTC) and co-carbonization (co-HTC) on the upgrading and denitrogenation capabilities of in
Hydrothermal co-carbonization (co-HTC)                     dustrial biowastes with low-rank coal as lignite (LC) was evaluated at 120–300 ◦ C. The results demonstrated that
Upgrading
                                                           coupled upgrading and denitrogenation occurred with a more intense effect on industrial biowastes than LC
Denitrogenation
                                                           during the HTC process. For co-HTC in the prevailing hydrolysis (180 ◦ C) or polymerization (240 ◦ C) stage, an
Industrial biowastes
Lignite coal                                               optimal mixing ratio of industrial biowaste/LC of 1:1–3:1 could result in an enhanced experimental calorific
Synergy                                                    value, energy recovery efficiency, nitrogen removal efficiency, and weakened experimental nitrogen content,
                                                           demonstrating the significant positive synergies on both upgrading and denitrogenation capabilities. The cor
                                                           responding synergistic coefficients were maximized at 7% and − 23% for the calorific value and nitrogen content
                                                           of hydrochars, respectively. The combined analyses of XPS, 13C NMR, and FTIR could provide evidence that these
                                                           synergies of co-HTC were intrinsically associated with LC: (1) its more stable carbon and nitrogen functionalities;
                                                           (2) promotion of its components or reaction sites on prevailing hydrolysis and polymerization reactions at
                                                           corresponding temperature stages.
1. Introduction                                                                                  energy have been shifting to low-rank coal such as lignite because of the
                                                                                                 large consumption of high-rank coal [4]. Therefore, the co-firing of in
    Today, biowaste co-firing in existing coal-fired power plants is                             dustrial biowaste and lignite is predicted to be a promising alternative
globally applied because it is a helpful way to reduce the emissions of                          solution for future heat and power generation. Despite the advantages of
sulfur dioxide (SO2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) due to its low sulfur                              co-firing in energy conservation and emission reduction, there are still
content and carbon neutrality, and it enables waste disposal via efficient                       some similar unfavorable features restricting the large-scale application
energy recovery [1,2]. With the sustainable eco-civilization centering on                        of most industrial biowastes and lignite, such as their high levels of
industrialization development, environmental protection, and fossil-fuel                         inherent moisture, high oxygen content, low energy density, and
utilization in China, several new trends in the energy utilization of                            abundant fuel-bound nitrogen [5,6]. Given this situation, suitable pre
biowaste and coal have emerged and received increasing attention: (1)                            treatment techniques targeting upgrading and denitrogenation for the
industrial biowastes have shown great potential as solid fuels due to                            production of modified solid fuel are indispensable for the pretreatment
their abundant organic matter [3]; (2) coal deposits aiming to supply                            of both industrial biowaste and lignite before their firing or co-firing.
     * Corresponding author at: School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, People’s Republic of China.
    ** Corresponding author.
       E-mail addresses: isaaczhanhao@163.com (H. Zhan), zengzhiyong@csu.edu.cn (Z. Zeng).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107540
Received 20 November 2021; Received in revised form 21 February 2022; Accepted 8 March 2022
Available online 10 March 2022
2213-3437/© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                        Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
    Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) occurs at a moderate tempera                of industrial biowaste and lignite.
ture under autogenous pressure in subcritical water, and has been                     As a laboratory study, the co-HTC of two different feedstocks to
extensively confirmed as an effective method of upgrading waste                   produce solid fuels has been gaining more attention in recent years.
biomass [7,8] and low-rank coal [9]. Continuous studies have elucidated           Several studies centering on nitrogen-rich biowastes and conventional
the reactions and pathways of upgrading low-grade fuels through HTC.              lignocellulosic biomass investigating the influence of co-HTC on
The upgrading of industrial biowastes by HTC mainly involves two                  hydrochar properties, which are characterized by the interactions be
processes: dewatering and coalification. Between them, coalification is           tween two feedstocks, have been reported [30–33]. Zhang et al. [30] and
regarded as the more critical reaction, as it consists of two opposite but        He et al. [32] found that a significant synergistic enhancement occurred
sequential reactions that occur during HTC: hydrolysis/degradation and            in the increased upgrading indices, including hydrochar yield, organic
condensation/aromatization. The former cleaves the bonds of functional            retention, carbon retention, and calorific value, in the co-HTC of sewage
groups (ester, ether, carboxyl, and hydroxyl) in biomacromolecules,               sludge with lignocellulosic biomass at a designated mixing ratio. This
while the latter would facilitate the formation of stable coal-like struc        synergy of the upgrading properties was also validated by Lang et al.
tures [10]. According to several studies [11–13], HTC was expressed as a          [31], who replaced sewage sludge with swine manure. Zheng et al. [33]
process simulating natural coalification, and it succeeded in converting          carried out the co-HTC of two nitrogen-rich biowastes and indicated that
industrial biowastes to high-quality biofuels with excellent combustion           the mass and energy densities of hydrochar from sewage sludge rose to a
behaviors. In our previous studies [3,14], it was identified that                 higher level with the addition of food waste. In regard to coal and bio
carbon-containing structures in industrial biowastes could be trans              waste, Nonaka et al. [5] proposed that polymerization was synergisti
formed from low-energy bonds (-C-H/-O/=O) to high-energy bonds                    cally promoted during co-HTC of low-rank coal and biomass, acquiring
(aromatic -C-C/=C) via hydrolysis, carbonization and polymerization               an upgraded and hydrophobic solid product. Saba et al. [28] evaluated
during HTC, producing more energy-efficient hydrochars. The removal               the synergistic effect of miscanthus biomass on bituminous coal during
of oxygen-containing functional groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl,             their co-HTC and observed that hydrochar had lower ash/sulfur contents
and methoxyl) and some aliphatic volatiles (methylene and methyl)                 and higher energy density. Furthermore, Kim et al. [34] and Song et al.
from low-rank lignite is believed to be the key to its upgrading [15,16].         [35] investigated the co-HTC of sewage sludge with peat and lignite
The reduction of these hydrophilic groups could efficiently decrease the          coals, respectively. The synergistic improvements in fuel properties such
equilibrium moisture content [17] and inhibit the moisture                        as calorific value, coalification degree, and fuel ratio were similarly
re-adsorption performance [18], together with the enhancement of                  obtained under expected operational conditions. As revealed by these
organic carbon species and the loss of some inorganic matter [19], thus           studies on biomass, biowastes, and coals, it is evident that the co-HTC
improving the lignite quality.                                                    technique has potential and advantages in producing more favorable
    In addition, HTC has been reported for the removal or stabilization of        solid fuels by upgrading organic species and removing harmful ele
nitrogen functionalities in industrial biowastes [20–22]. Some conclu            ments, which are becoming recognized by scholars as means of evalu
sions were obtained regarding the evolution pathways of nitrogen                  ating the effective utilization of moist biowaste and/or coal blends.
functionalities in raw feedstocks: (1) unstable functionalities were              However, previous studies on industrial biowaste and lignite had some
released into the liquid phase in the form of inorganic nitrogen ions             obvious limitations.
(such as NH4+) and soluble organic nitrogen species via hydrolysis or
deamination reactions; (2) stable functionalities were converted into               (1) Although denitrogenation pretreatment is vital for the clean en
heterocyclic-N bound in the solid phase via condensation and cycliza                   ergy utilization of nitrogen-rich feedstocks, there have been no
tion reactions. Mo et al. [23] proposed that high-temperature HTC could                 studies on both the upgrading and denitrogenation properties
cause a partial transformation of nitrogen functional groups from lignite               during the co-HTC process. These factors have been mentioned by
into the liquid phase, resulting in coal fuels that are cleaner than their              few scholars [30,32,33] from the perspective of nitrogen immo
precursors. According to studies by Cen’s group [24,25], HTC pre                       bilization during the co-HTC of biowaste/biomass blends, and the
treatment was able to alter the content and type of nitrogen function                  synergistic denitrogenation behaviors were also neglected.
ality in lignite, limiting the release of typical NOx precursors during the         (2) The majority of studies have merely focused on sewage sludge,
subsequent thermal transformation process. Consequently, HTC pre                       which is different from other nitrogen-rich industrial biowastes
treatment was believed to be conducive to NOx emission reduction of                     with high ash content, low organic matter, and complex nitrogen
low-rank coal combustion.                                                               functionality [14,36]. Sample diversity on industrial biowastes
    All the studies mentioned above have proven that HTC has the ability                should be further broadened for their better energy utilization.
to produce modified solid fuels from either industrial biowaste or lignite          (3) Evolution of carbon and nitrogen functionalities coexisted during
by upgrading low-grade fuels and promoting denitrogenation. Hydro                      the HTC process and pursued their respective distinctive path
thermal co-carbonization (Co-HTC) treatment is suitable for the prepa                  ways at different temperature ranges for both industrial biowaste
ration of two feedstocks, such as industrial biowaste and lignite, to                   [14,22] and lignite [15,25]. In other words, the corresponding
produce a mixed modified hydrochar for the firing process instead of co-                upgrading and denitrogenation characteristics determined by the
firing. However, the following challenges remain to be solved: (1) the                  evolution pathways might be associated with hydrothermal
nonuniformity of co-firing caused by the typical differences in density                 temperature. For the co-HTC of industrial biowastes and lignite,
and particle size [26] and (2) the poor energy efficiency of co-firing due              the relevant synergistic effects and the properties of the corre
to the sharply different calorific values of the feedstocks [27]. Further              sponding hydrochars under specific operational conditions are
more, co-HTC has exhibited some additional advantages for biowaste                      still unclear, which needs to be further elucidated.
and coal over conventional HTC. The dehydration and decarboxylation
reactions can create acidic conditions during the HTC of biowaste,                    Given this situation, the objective of this work was to elucidate the
facilitating the removal of harmful elements while upgrading coal [28].           synergistic effects of industrial biowaste and lignite on both the
The metal elements or porous structures of coal provide potential                 upgrading and denitrogenation properties during co-HTC. The structural
condensation         sites      [29],      possibly     promoting       the       characteristics of the corresponding hydrochars were also examined to
condensation-polymerization reactions that determine hydrochar for               acquire cleaner, more efficient solid fuels from biowaste/coal blends. A
mation during the upgrading of biowaste. Evidently, these coupling                lignite coal (LC) from typical Chinese coal-producing area of ‘Energy
interactions indicate the formation of better modified hydrochar when             Golden Delta’ was employed. Two representatives of industrial bio
the co-HTC of biowaste and coal is used, suggesting the feasibility of            wastes, Chuanxiong herbal waste (CHW) and penicillin mycelial waste
co-HTC as an effective pretreatment for the expected energy utilization           (PMW), were reasonably selected due to the following reasons [3,13,
                                                                              2
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                          Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
14]. (1) massive initial moisture but substantial organic matter (dry             difference (FC=100-VM-Ash; O=100-C-H-N-S-Ash). (3) Calorific value
basis); (2) high nitrogen content with big gradient; (3) distinct                 (higher heating value, HHV) was determined using the reliable fitting
biochemical components (lignocellulose and non-lignocellulose types).             formula proposed by literature [37] (HHV=0.3491⋅C+1.1783⋅H+
The key purposes of this study were to: (1) identify the characteristics of       0.1005⋅S-0.1034⋅O-0.0151⋅N-0.0211⋅Ash). (4) Ash components were
upgrading and denitrogenation in the HTC of each feedstock to ascertain           analyzed by an AxiosmAX-PETRO XRF spectrometer (PANalytical B.V.,
the optimal and decisive influencing factors; (2) explore the effect of the       Netherlands). (5) Crude fiber content was determined based on GB/T
mixing ratio on the co-HTC variables involving process variables (en             6434–2006; contents of protein and lipid were measured according to
ergy recovery efficiency, nitrogen removal efficiency) and state vari            the Kjeldahl method (GB 5009.5–2016) and Soxhlet extraction method
ables (higher heating value, nitrogen content) in different characteristic        (GB 5009.6–2016), respectively; carbohydrate content was calculated
temperature ranges to explicate the synergistic upgrading and deni               by difference (Carbohydrate=100-Protein-Lipid-Ash). In addition,
trogenation behaviors; and (3) compare the chemical structures of cor            proximate, ultimate and calorific value analyses of hydrochars were
responding hydrochar, especially in terms of their carbon and nitrogen            determined using the same testing methods for feedstocks.
functionalities via the combination of XPS, solid-state 13C NMR, and                  XPS analysis was used to characterize the surface chemistry (carbon
FTIR analytic techniques to further evaluate the synergistic effects of           and nitrogen functionalities) of each raw feedstock and their respective
co-HTC.                                                                           hydrochars. The C 1 s and N 1 s spectra were recorded by an ESCALAB
                                                                                  250Xi XPS spectrometer (Thermo VG Scientific, USA) equipped with a
2. Experimental                                                                   monochromatic Al (Kα) X-ray source (150 W, 1486.68 eV) operating at a
                                                                                  30 eV pass energy, a 0.1 step size, a 500 µm diameter spot size and a 90◦
2.1. Materials                                                                    electron take-off angle. All spectra were evaluated using Advantage
                                                                                  software based on the following principles: (1) binding energy calibra
    The feedstocks (CHW, PMW, and LC) employed in this work were                  tion using principal C 1 s peak (284.8 eV); (2) peak fitting using a
collected from local factories in Guangdong, Hebei, and Jilin provinces           1.40–1.65 eV FWHM, a 30% Gaussian-Lorentzian function and Shirley-
in China. CHW and PMW are two pharmaceutical process residues, and                type background subtraction; and (3) curve resolution using specific
LC is local low-rank coal. All samples were first dried at 105 ◦ C for at         types and binding energies for carbon and nitrogen functionalities, as
least 24 h, after which time they were milled into a fine powder, filtered        shown in Fig. S1. The detailed XPS analysis can be found in previous
through a 60 mesh sieve, redried to ensure that the moisture-free sam            studies [3,36].
ples had the same particle size, and then stored in a dry vacuum desic               FTIR analysis was introduced to characterize the organic functional
cator for further analyses and experiments.                                       groups of raw feedstocks and corresponding hydrochars under target
                                                                                  operational conditions. A Tensor 27 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Ger
2.2. Experimental procedures                                                      many) was used for each characterization trial in which a mixture of
                                                                                  sample and KBr (1:100 w/w) were ground and pressed into the pellet,
    HTC and co-HTC experiments were both performed in a 250 mL                    and immediately measured in absorbance mode ranging from 4000
tightly-sealed stainless-steel autoclave reactor with stirring capabilities       cm− 1 to 400 cm− 1 with a resolution of 4 cm− 1. Prior to each measure
(SLM250, Senlang Co. Ltd., China). During each HTC experiment,                    ment, the background line was established by taking KBr as the refer
feedstock (10 g) and deionized water (100 mL) were loaded into the                ence, which was subtracted from the spectra of the target sample.
reactor, which was then sparged with an inert gas (99.999% argon) for                 Solid-state 13C-CP-MAS NMR analysis was used to evaluate the car
at least 10 min to remove the air. After that, the reactor was heated to          bon chemistry of the solid samples (raw feedstocks and targeting
the desired reaction temperature and the temperature was maintained               hydrochars). The tests were performed on an AVANCE III 300 spec
for a fixed residence time (30 min). The stirring rate was fixed at 300           trometer (Bruker, Germany) at a resonance frequency of 75 MHz using a
rpm throughout the reaction process to ensure product homogeneity.                4 mm MAS probe with a spinning rate of 6500 Hz. The 13C spectra were
Specifically, for the HTC experiment, the reaction temperature ranged             recorded under the following conditions: contact time of 2 ms, recycle
from 120◦ to 300◦ C with a 30 ◦ C interval. For the co-HTC procedure, the         delay of 5 s, and scan number of 5120. The 13C chemical shifts were
industrial biowaste-to-lignite coal ratios were set to 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3,         externally referenced to the carbon tert-butyl signal of solid adamantane
and the samples were labeled CHW:LC and PMW:LC. The reaction                      at 38.48 ppm. The curve-fitting of each spectrum was processed using
temperature was selected according to the experimental HTC results.               Gaussian PeakFit of Origin 2018 software. According to previous studies
    When the reaction was complete, the reactor was rapidly cooled to             [3,14,15], the spectra could be assigned to six main regions: (1)
ambient temperature with a fan. The solid-liquid mixture was separated            unsubstituted saturated alkyl C (alk, 0–43 ppm); (2) alkyl C substituted
by vacuum filtration with a Buchner funnel through 0.45 µm PTFE filter            by O and N atoms (OCH3/NCH, 43–60 ppm); (3) carbohydrate C (O-alk,
paper. The solid product (hydrochar) was transferred, washed with                 60–110 ppm), including alkyl C singly bonded to one O atom (60–93
deionized water, and then oven-dried at 105 ◦ C until a constant weight           ppm) and alkyl C bonded to two O atoms (93–110 ppm); (4) aromatic C
was reached. Subsequently, the hydrochar was weighed and milled into              (Ar, 110–160 ppm), including aromatic C-H (Ar-H, 110–125 ppm), ar
a fine powder of < 180 µm for storage before further physical and                 omatic C-C (Ar-C, 125–145 ppm) and aromatic C-O (Ar-O, 145–160
chemical characterization. If necessary, the liquid product was collected         ppm); (5) carboxyl, ester and amide C (COO/N-C–     – O, 160–190 ppm);
and stored in a refrigerator below − 20 ◦ C until analysis. To minimize           and (6) aldehyde and ketone C (C–   – O, 190–220 ppm).
the experimental error, each run was performed in triplicate so the
average and standard deviation could be taken.                                    2.4. Formula and calculation
2.3. Physical and chemical characterization                                          There are four important indicators for evaluating the upgrading and
                                                                                  denitrogenation properties during HTC: the energy densification ratio
    Basic fuel properties of feedstocks were determined according to the          (EDR) and energy recovery efficiency (ERE) for the former, and the ni
testing methods described in our previous studies [14,36]. (1) Elemental          trogen retention ratio (NRR) and nitrogen removal efficiency (NRE) for
compositions were determined using a Vario EL cube CHNS analyzer                  the latter. These indicators can be calculated using Eqs. (1–4).
(Elementar Co., Ltd., Germany). (2) Two proximate components, vola                                   /
                                                                                  EDR = HHVhydrochar HHVfeedstock                                      (1)
tile matter (VM) and Ash, were measured in a conventional muffle
furnace according to ASTM D3175, D3174, E872 and D1102, respec                                   /
                                                                                  NRR = Nhydrochar Nfeedstock                                                     (2)
tively; both the FC (fixed carbon) and O contents were calculated by
                                                                              3
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                                                         Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
    where HHV and N are the high heating value and nitrogen content of                                         Prior to discussion, the fuel properties of raw feedstock samples were
the corresponding solid sample, respectively. ωhydrochar is the hydrochar                                  initially evaluated, which was presented in Table 1. As shown, CHW and
yield which was determined by Eq. (5).                                                                     PMW are both suitable representatives of N-rich industrial biowastes
                            /                                                                              based on the following physicochemical properties: (1) their abundant
ωhydrochar = Weighthydrochar Weightfeedstock ∙100%                    (5)
                                                                                                           organic matter of 80–90 wt%, including 40–45% C, 6–7% H, and
    Carbon retention (CR) and organic retention (OR) were introduced to                                    30–40% O, ensured an excellent calorific value (HHV) of 18–20 MJ/kg
improve the understanding of hydrochar production, and their calcu                                        on a dry basis (equal to forest residues), suggesting their better energy
lation is given in Eqs. (6–7).                                                                             utilization; (2) their higher nitrogen content with great gradients and
               /                                                                                           distinctive biochemical and ash components covered the diversity of N-
CR = Chydrochar Cfeedstock ∙ωhydrochar                              (6)
                                                                                                           rich industrial biowastes. In addition, the LC contained moderate vola
                        /                                                                                  tile matter (~50 wt%) and less ash (~ 6 wt%) and had a higher calorific
OR = (100-Ashhydrochar ) (100-Ashfeedstock )∙ωhydrochar                                      (7)           value (~24 MJ/kg), indicating that it was a lump of superior lignite coal.
where C and Ash are the carbon and ash contents of the corresponding
solid sample, respectively.                                                                                3.2. Upgrading and denitrogenation properties during the HTC process
    To explore the synergistic effects of the co-HTC treatment, compar
isons between the experimental value (EV) and the calculated value                                         3.2.1. Changes of upgrading and denitrogenation indicators during the HTC
(CV) were performed; these comparisons focused on the process vari                                        process
ables of co-HTC (ERE and NRE) and the state variables of hydrochar                                             Temperature is a main determinant of reaction intensity, element
(HHV and nitrogen content). Based on the assumption that no in                                            transformation, and functional group evolution during the HTC process
teractions occur in the co-HTC of two different feedstocks, the CV was                                     [38]. Herein, we first discussed the variation of each indicator relating to
determined by the physical mixture of hydrochars from two feedstocks                                       upgrading and denitrogenation with the hydrothermal temperature for
at a target mixing ratio. Taking the mixing ratio of 3:1 (CHW: LC) as an                                   HTC of industrial biowaste and lignite, as illustrated in Fig. 1.
example, the CV of each variable was calculated as follows.                                                    It was observed that the upgrading and denitrogenation indicators all
    For state values (HHV, nitrogen content), the calculation is shown in                                  present significant distinctions between industrial biowaste and low-
Eq. (8).                                                                                                   rank coal. For LC, both the ERE and NRE showed a slight variation
CVstate = 0.75∙statehydrochar, CHW + 0.25∙statehydrochar, LC                                 (8)           with increasing temperature, remaining at approximately 85% and 10%,
                                                                                                           respectively, when 300 ◦ C was reached. This phenomenon also corre
    For process values (ERE, NRE), the calculation was performed using                                     sponds to the small decreases in ωhydrochar, CR, and OR (Fig. 1e). The
their respective equations mentioned above. The CV of the involved                                         above observation can be explained by the fact that efficient hydro
state variables were first confirmed according to Eq. (8). For example,                                    thermal treatment of coals requires a higher temperature due to their
the ERE was calculated with Eq. (9):                                                                       strong hydrothermal stability, which was reported by Mursito et al.
                      /
CVERE = CVHHVhydrochar CVHHVfeedstock ∙CVωhydrochar                 (9)                                    [39], who observed that higher temperatures (> 250 ◦ C) could promote
                                                                                                           the efficient hydrothermal conversion of coal. It is evident that HTC
CVHHVhydrochar = 0.75∙HHVhydrochar, CHW + 0.25∙HHVhydrochar, LC                             (9.1)          treatment (120–300 ◦ C) led to limited energy loss and minor nitrogen
                                                                                                           removal for the LC employed in this work. As the temperature increased,
CVHHVfeedstock = 0.75∙HHVfeedstock, CHW + 0.25∙HHVfeedstock, LC                             (9.2)          a slight increase in the EDR was observed, as shown in Fig. 1c, which
                                                                                                           may be caused by the loss of oxygen-containing groups [15,18]; the NRR
CVωhydrochar = 0.75∙ωhydrochar, CHW + 0.25∙ωhydrochar, LC                                   (9.3)          value initially showed a negligible decrease, and then it increased
                                                                                                           slightly after 210 ◦ C due to the reduction of nitrogen-containing,
    To quantitively explicate the synergistic effect, another parameter                                    carboxyl or hydroxyl groups in different temperature ranges (Fig. 1d)
called the synergistic coefficient (SC) was defined as Eq. (10).                                           [16]. Therefore, it was confirmed that HTC treatment below 300 ◦ C had
                                                               /                                           a finite effect on upgrading and denitrogenating the LC samples in this
SCstate or process = (EVstate or process − CVstate or process ) CVstate or process ∙100% (10)
                                                                                                           work.
                                                                                                               Regarding industrial biowastes, a significant decrease in the ERE and
Table 1
Properties of raw industrial biowastes and lignite coal.
  Sample         Proximate analysisdb (wt%)                HHV       Ultimate analysisdb (wt%)                                                Biochemical component analysisdb (wt%)
  CHW            73.19                     11.26           17.68                     6.12           2.17                      38.35           11.88          74.13           2.73      13.70
                           15.55                                     42.10                                     0.00
  PMW            79.72                     8.16            19.77                     6.66           8.14                      32.53           26.25          57.74           7.85      1.91
                           12.12                                     44.22                                     0.29
  LC             52.23                6.25          24.39                      5.26     0.88                                  26.76           n.a.           n.a.            n.a.      n.a.
                          41.52                                   60.31                                        0.54
  Sample         Ash component analysis (%, expressed in form of oxides)
                 SiO2           P2O5         K2 O                        Al2O3      MgO                                               Fe2O3           TiO2           SO3                       Na2O
                                                                                                                      CaO
  CHW            35.98             10.17           13.42                     10.66           9.49                     8.80            4.86            0.64           4.73                      0.38
  PMW            0.70              36.14           23.80                     0.22            0.75                     28.49           0.65            0.02           7.94                      0.61
  LC             28.71             0.34            1.01                      12.60           2.16                     21.21           15.42           0.65           17.12                     0.11
                                                                                                    4
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                             Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
Fig. 1. Changes in different variables vs. the temperature during the HTC process of each feedstock: (a-d): ERE, NRE, EDR, NRR; (e): auxiliary variables- ωhydrochar,
OR, CR.
an obvious increase in the NRE were observed in Fig. 1a and Fig. 1b for               revealed in a previous study [14]. The distinctive ash components like
two samples at elevated temperatures from 120 ◦ C to 300 ◦ C, respec                 calcium, ferrum or magnesium in the two samples (Table 1) have some
tively. The tread of each curve can be characterized into two stages with             effects on these two properties [7].
the dividing point between 180 and 210 ◦ C, exhibiting a more dramatic
rate at low temperatures than at high temperatures. According to pre                 3.2.2. Evolution of carbon functionalities during the HTC process
vious studies [10,38], two series of opposite reactions occur during the                  To further explain the upgrading properties obtained above, carbon
HTC of biomass: (1) hydrolysis, dehydration, decarboxylation, and                     functionalities in feedstocks and corresponding hydrochar products
deamination; and (2) aromatization, cyclization, and condensation                     were identified by the XPS technique, and the C 1 s spectra were ac
polymerization. The reactions in the first series break the linkage bonds             quired and accurately peak-fitted in Fig. S2. By integrating the peak area
in biomacromolecule groups and convert some monomers or oligomer                      in each XPS spectrum, changes in relative content of carbon function
fragments into the gas/liquid phases, leading to the loss of organic                  alities in solid phase during the HTC were depicted in Fig. 2.
substances in the solid phase and serving as the main pathway at low                      As shown in Fig. 2, for carbon functionalities, nonoxygen-containing
temperatures. The reactions in the second series achieve the agglomer                groups (C–  – C/C-C/C-H) account for a higher proportion than oxygen-
ation and integration of active intermediates by strong solid-solid or                containing groups for samples, especially for LC. With increasing tem
solid-liquid interactions to form secondary coal-like structures, which is            perature, the predominant C–   – C/C-C/C-H decreases first and then in
favorable for superior energy-density solid fuels and more dominant at                creases, showing more significance for industrial biowastes than lignite.
high temperatures. Due to the competitiveness of two opposite reaction                This phenomenon is ascribed to two varying pathways of C–    – C/C-C/C-H
series in different temperature ranges, the evidential results for HTC on             considering the overlapping XPS peaks [3,40]: (1) the depolymerization
upgrading and denitrogenating industrial biowastes can be summarized                  of aliphatic C-C/C-H via hydrolysis; and (2) the formation of aromatic
as follows: (1) HTC is an energy-loss process (increased ERE in Fig. 1a)              C-C/C– – C via condensation polymerization. The former is more domi
consistent with other decreased auxiliary indicators in Fig. 1e, though it            nant at low temperatures (leading to the resultant decrease), which is
can be used to upgrade solid products at high temperatures (enhanced                  largely associated with the energy loss of HTC. In contrast, the latter
EDR in Fig. 1c). The EDR decreased as the temperature increased from                  becomes more intense when the temperature goes up high (resulting in a
270◦ to 300 ◦ C probably due to some prevailing hydrothermal lique                   constant increase), which corresponds to the upgrading capability of
faction reactions at overly high temperatures, suggesting the importance              HTC due to the formation of aromatic C-C/C–     – C bonds, which are in a
of suitable HTC temperature on biowaste upgrading. (2) HTC is also an                 higher energy state. In addition, C-(O, N) groups, which are present in
efficient nitrogen-removal process (increased NRE in Fig. 1b) but results             alcohol, ether, phenol, and protein species, are the main
in uncertainty regarding the relative content of nitrogen retained in                 oxygen-containing carbon functionalities, which exhibit a more obvious
hydrochar (irregular NRR in Fig. 1d), depending on the balance of two                 decline for two industrial biowastes than LC during the HTC process. The
reaction series in relation to nitrogen-containing groups [7]. Comparing              other two oxygen-containing carbon functionalities (C–         – O/O-C-O,
the two samples, PMW has higher values in both the ERE and NRE than                   O–– C-O) were observed at a low fraction and with a visible reduction
CHW, leading to a lower EDR and NRR, which also coincides with the                    with increasing temperature. It was inferred that the energy loss of HTC
corresponding values of ωhydrochar, CR, and OR. This finding is supported             is caused by a combined decrease in oxygen-containing carbon func
by evidence that PMW (non-lignocellulose type) contains more unstable                 tionalities with a stronger effect of C-(O, N) than C–  – O, leading to a
biochemical components than CHW (lignocellulose type), which was                      reduction in the O/C ratio in the solid phase. This finding is mostly
                                                                                  5
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                         Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
Fig. 2. Comparisons of fraction of each carbon functionality in the solid phase (feedstocks and corresponding hydrochars).
consistent with those of previous studies [40,41]. In general, it can be          feedstocks, as is a small amount of inorganic-N (N-IN). In the corre
concluded that the transformation of nonoxygen-containing carbon                  sponding hydrochars formed in the temperature range of 120–300 ◦ C,
functionalities and the removal of oxygen-containing carbon function             the number of N-A groups is dramatically lower, and N-IN vanishes
alities with HTC progression are mainly responsible for the upgrading of          rapidly; additionally, different heterocyclic-N like pyrrolic (N-5), pyr
solid products and the energy loss during HTC, respectively, which is             idinic (N-6), and quaternary (N-Q) groups emerge and increase
more intense for industrial biowastes than LC.                                    observably. The disappearance of N-IN is attributed to its dissolution or
                                                                                  hydrolysis into the hydrolysate in the form of NH4+ and NO3- ions with
3.2.3. Evolution of nitrogen functionalities during the HTC process               the help of subcritical H2O [42]; the sustained reduction of N-A would
    To further explicate the above denitrogenation properties, nitrogen           be explained by two mechanisms: (1) labile N-A is hydrolyzed and
functionalities in feedstocks and corresponding hydrochar products                degraded into low-molecular weight organic nitrogen in the liquid
were identified by the XPS technique, and the N 1 s spectra were ac              phase, such as free amino acids and peptide fragments, simultaneously
quired and accurately peak-fitted in Fig. S3. By integrating the peak area        producing inorganic NH4+ by deamination reactions [13,20]; (2) stable
in each XPS spectrum, changes in relative content of nitrogen func               N-A is converted to N-heterocyclic compounds in the solid phase by
tionalities in solid phase during the HTC were depicted in Fig. 3.                direct cyclization or dimerization reactions [21,43]. It is easy to
    Regarding nitrogen functionalities, a distinction in categories is            conclude that the denitrogenation of the HTC process originates from
observed between industrial biowaste and lignite. N-A, referring to               the dissolution of N-IN and the deamination of N-A. The above two re
amide, amino, and amine groups, is predominant in industrial biowaste             action routes are predominant at low temperatures, leading to a
Fig. 3. Comparisons of fraction of each nitrogen functionality in the solid phase (feedstocks and corresponding hydrochars).
                                                                              6
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                          Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
dramatic increase in the NRE below 180–210 ◦ C, as shown in Fig. 1b.              their fractions. A lower N-6 than N-Q suggests that nitrogen at the edges
When the hydrothermal temperature is high, free nitrogen intermediates            of the graphene layer is less significant. In addition, the change in N-X
(amino acids, peptide fragments) in the liquid phase probably react with          (increase first and then decrease) with temperature probably depends on
reducing sugars via Maillard reactions, forming liquid heterocyclic-N,            the balance between oxidization and repositioning effects in relation to
which would be further polymerized to solid heterocyclic-N (N-5, N-6,             edge-N [25]. By comparing the changes in nitrogen content and func
and N-Q) by cyclization or ring-condensation reactions [42,44].                   tionality during HTC of lignite, it can be concluded that the intrinsic
Consequently, high temperature is favorable for the formation of an               denitrogenation of hydrothermal modification (< 300 ◦ C) on lignite
aromatic structure with nitrogen incorporation via solid-solid reaction           mainly lies in nitrogen stabilization instead of nitrogen removal in the
and liquid-solid transformation, immobilizing more stable nitrogen in             solid phase.
hydrochars. This result corresponds to the slower increase of NRE shown               In general, upgrading and denitrogenation during the conventional
in Fig. 1b and the more remarkable increasing fraction of N-heterocyclic          HTC process (< 300 ◦ C) have these following characteristics: (1)
structures in Fig. 3 for two industrial biowastes within the higher tem          simultaneously coupled behavior; (2) distinctive indicator tread and
perature range. In addition, compared to PMW, CHW presents a weaker               intrinsic motivation identified by hydrothermal temperature; and (3) a
denitrogenation effect involving a lower NRE (Fig. 1b), higher NRR                remarkable effect on industrial biowastes while extremely finite influ
(Fig. 1d), and higher N-heterocyclic fraction (Fig. 3a), which is probably        ence on LC. Due to these features, 180 and 240 ◦ C were selected as the
because CHW contains more stable N-A types than PMW [22,36].                      representative temperatures for the prevailing hydrothermal hydrolysis
    By comparison, the LC sample only contains N-heterocyclic groups              and polymerization stages of industrial biowastes, respectively. By
involving N-5 (main), N-6, N-Q, and (oxide-N) N-X, and presents a                 focusing on their co-HTC with LC at two typical temperatures, upgrading
steady decrease in the N-5 fraction as well as a mild increase in the N-6         and denitrogenation behaviors were further separately investigated in
and N-Q fractions as the HTC temperature is raised. It is commonly                the following two sections.
accepted that the HTC of lignite coal is an upgrading process at a mo
lecular level and is associated with the rupture of functional groups, the
condensation of macromolecules, and interactions with the aqueous                 3.3. Synergistic upgrading behavior during the co-HTC process
system. According to previous studies [25,43,45], the evolution of
coal-nitrogen functionalities during the HTC included (1) ring expansion              First, HHV was employed as the state variable and ERE was
of pyrrole (N-5) and hydroxyl loss of pyridone (N-5) to form N-6; (2)             employed as the process variable to indicate the upgrading behavior
condensation of macromolecules to the aromatic graphene layer that                during the co-HTC. With the determination of two values (EV, CV) in
altered the nitrogen conformations located at different positions of the          relation to HHV and ERE via Eqs. (3, 8, 9), their changes with the mixing
layer: ‘edge-N′ (N-6), ‘valley-N′ (N-Q) and ‘center-N′ (N-Q); and (3)             ratio of industrial biowaste/LC during co-HTC at two representative
possible oxidation of edge-N to form N-X because the edge position was            temperatures are illustrated in Fig. 4.
more susceptible to the hydrothermal environment. Notably, the con                   It was similarly observed that both the HHV of hydrochar and the
stant decrease in the N-5 fraction shown in Fig. 3c is attributed to its          ERE of the co-HTC increase constantly when the mixing ratio of indus
direct and indirect conversion to N-6 and N-Q, leading to an increase in          trial biowaste/LC was decreased at the two temperatures. This result
                                                                                  indicates that co-HTC of biomass with low-rank coal is an appropriate
Fig. 4. Effect of mixing ratio on upgrading variables: (a, b)-HHV; (c, d)-ERE.
                                                                              7
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                            Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
option for obtaining solid biofuels with high energy density and simul             co-HTC is mainly associated with two factors related to LC: (1) good
taneously avoiding energy loss. When co-HTC is performed at any                     thermal stability; (2) favorable enhancement of hydrolysis and poly
mixing ratio, a high-temperature scenario (240 ◦ C) can maintain a                  merization of industrial biowastes.
higher experimental HHV while presenting a close ERE than a low-
temperature scenario (180 ◦ C). This observation suggests that the
presence of a certain proportion of LC can effectively compensate for the           3.4. Synergistic denitrogenation behavior during the co-HTC process
increasing energy loss of extensive co-HTC; moreover, hydrochar
products with higher energy quality are also ensured. Notably, low-rank                 In addition, nitrogen content as the state variable and NRE as the
coal was proven to be an excellent candidate for improving the fuel                 process variable were selected to evaluate the denitrogenation behavior
performance of high-moisture biomass via co-HTC, coinciding with                    during the co-HTC process. With the confirmation of two values (EV,
some views of previous studies [5,35]. Moreover, it is interesting to note          CV) in relation to nitrogen content and NRE via Eqs. (4, 8, 9), their
that the EVs of the two upgrading indicators acquired from co-HTC of                variations with the mixing ratio of industrial biowaste/LC during co-
the industrial biowaste/LC blend were all higher than the corresponding             HTC at two representative temperatures are depicted in Fig. 5.
CVs at the two temperatures. Taking the HHV as an example, when the                     As seen in Fig. 5, both the nitrogen content of hydrochar and the NRE
mixing ratio was 3:1, the EVs increased by 1.4–1.5 and 0.9–1.1 MJ/kg at             of the co-HTC decreased gradually with increasing LC proportion at the
180 and 240 ◦ C compared to the CVs, respectively. The optimal mixing               two temperatures. Compared to industrial biowastes, the nitrogen con
ratio was observed in the range of 3:1–1:1 with corresponding syner                tent of the LC was quite lower (Table 1), and the structures were more
gistic coefficients of 5–7% (180 ◦ C) and 3–5% (240 ◦ C). It was therefore          stable (Fig. 3). Accordingly, the gradual addition of LC caused a signif
confirmed that the co-HTC of industrial biowastes with LC had a sig                icant decline in nitrogen content and increased the proportion of stable
nificant positive synergistic effect on enhancing the quality of hydrochar          nitrogen functionalities in blending feedstocks, whose HTC can certainly
with less energy loss in all temperature ranges. This result may be due to          result in a decrease in both the NRE and nitrogen content of hydrochar.
the additional interactions between specific components of two feed                Interestingly, at any mixing ratio for the two temperatures, the nitrogen
stocks with different reactivities and thermal stabilities [30]. In the             content had obviously lower EVs than CVs, while the NRE showed the
prevailing hydrolysis stage (180 ◦ C), LC seldom participates in the re            opposite result. The combined findings demonstrate that co-HTC of in
action; in such cases, it is possible that stable organic species and cata         dustrial biowastes and LC is capable of synergistically denitrogenating a
lytic inorganic elements in LC can compensate for the energy loss of                solid product, and this synergy is also found to have an enhancement
hydrochar and facilitate the dehydration of macromolecules in bio                  effect, exhibiting an optimal mixing ratio ranging from 3:1–1:1 with
wastes, respectively [46]. In the prevailing polymerization stage                   maximal synergistic coefficients of − 23% (nitrogen content) and 67%
(240 ◦ C), in addition to its excellent energy preservation capacity, LC            (NRE). Based on the nitrogen evolution that occurs during conventional
can provide potential reaction sites to promote the aggregation and                 HTC, which was discussed in Section 3.2.1, it is understandable that the
condensation of biowaste-hydrolyzed intermediates, resulting in                     denitrogenation of industrial biowastes depends on the dominance be
enhanced polymerization to attain a higher HHV and ERE [5,28]. Hence,               tween nitrogen removal (dissolution, hydrolysis, and deamination re
we can infer that the positive synergistic upgrading performance of                 actions) and nitrogen incorporation (Maillard, dimerization, and ring-
                                                                                    condensation reactions) relating to those nitrogen functionalities; the
Fig. 5. Effect of mixing ratio on denitrogenation variables: (a, b)-nitrogen content; (c, d)-NRE.
                                                                                8
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                         Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
denitrogenation of LC manifests as the main nitrogen stabilization                in carbon functionalities among different solid samples are compared in
accompanying very weak nitrogen loss. In addition, the detected nitro            Fig. 6.
gen content in LC is much lower than that in industrial biowastes,                                         – C/C-C/C-H and C-(O, N) are two main types of
                                                                                      As shown in Fig. 6, C–
especially in PMW. These combined results indicate that the positive              carbon functionalities in both feedstocks and hydrochar at any operating
synergistic denitrogenation effect of co-HTC is probably ascribed to the          condition. Co-HTC hydrochars possess an upward C–     – C/C-C/C-H frac
promotion of nitrogen removal pathways or the inhibition of nitrogen              tion and a downward C-(O, N) fraction when the added amount of LC is
immobilization routes, which is caused by the interactions of the bio            increased at the two temperatures. The aforementioned experimental
waste/lignite blend. As previous studies demonstrated [7,42], alkaline            C–– C/C-C/C-H and C-(O, N) fractions are higher and lower than their
and alkaline earth metal ions could accelerate HTC denitrogenation                corresponding calculated values (blue and red dotted lines), respec
through enhanced hydrolysis and deamination reactions. In addition,               tively. These structural characteristics can further demonstrate the
Zheng et al. [33] also reported that the elevated proportion of sewage            capability of the co-HTC of industrial biowastes with LC to improve their
sludge/food waste during co-HTC would inhibit the Maillard reaction by            fuel quality, as the enhancement of C– – C/C-C/C-H and the reduction of
weakened carbonization and polymerization reactions. Similarly, the               C-(O, N) are typical structural indicators for the upgrading capability
addition of LC would achieve two favorable effects in the system. First,          [14,40,41].
the increase in helpful metal ions such as Ca2+ and Fe3+ may promote                  Additionally, solid-state 13C NMR analysis was employed as the
the hydrolysis of solid-N into the liquid phase (Table 1); second, the            corresponding supplementary demonstration. Based on the 13C NMR
organic macromolecules in feedstocks present a more stable tread,                 spectra in Fig. S5, the proportion of each carbon-containing structure in
which prevents their degradation into soluble small monomers such as              the solid phase was calculated and is presented in Table 2.
reducing sugars, inevitably weakening the Maillard reaction during the                As shown in Table 2, essential evidence for the evolution of carbon
secondary polymerization stage. In addition, it is also implied that LC           functionalities in relation to upgrading capability can be observed,
exhibits a more significant nitrogen stabilization effect with the co-HTC         coinciding with the XPS results. From raw feedstock to hydrochar at
of CHW due to their similar nitrogen contents. Therefore, as Fig. 5               180 ◦ C, the dominant carbon change for industrial biowastes is the
shows, the co-HTC of CHW with LC can largely narrow the difference in             decline of oxygen- or nitrogen-containing carbons with the sequence of
nitrogen content and NRE between the two temperatures, and present a              COO/N-C–  – O > O-Alk, accompanying the main increase of Alk carbon.
more obvious effect on the NRE at each mixing ratio, in contrast to the           This finding demonstrates that hydrolysis reactions (dehydration,
co-HTC of PMW.                                                                    decarboxylation, and deamination) are more prevalent than polymeri
                                                                                  zation reactions (aromatization, condensation) during the moderate
                                                                                  HTC of industrial biowastes. When undergoing extreme HTC, proportion
3.5. Structural characteristics of modified hydrochar
                                                                                  of the O-Alk carbon shows a significant drop higher than that of the
                                                                                  COO/N-C–  – O carbon; additionally, much Ar carbon is formed (~ 40%)
3.5.1. Structural characteristics of solid-carbon from the co-HTC
                                                                                  and the proportion of Alk carbon increases constantly. These structural
   The structural characteristics of the solid phase (feedstock and
                                                                                  carbon changes reveal that aromatization and polymerization reactions
hydrochar product) in terms of carbon and nitrogen functionalities were
                                                                                  are dominant and coexist with hydrolysis-related reactions during se
essential to further evaluate the above positive synergies of co-HTC. For
                                                                                  vere HTC. Compared to raw LC, hydrochar at 180 ◦ C shows no
one thing, based on the detailed XPS identification (Fig. S4), the changes
Fig. 6. Comparisons of carbon functionalities in solid samples (raw feedstocks, targeting hydrochars).
                                                                              9
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                             Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
Table 2
Proportion (%) of carbon-containing structures (13C NMR) in raw feedstocks and targeting hydrochars.
  Samples          Alk (unsubstituted         OCH3/NCH (alkyl C substituted   O-Alk                Ar (aromatic    COO/N-C–  –O (carboxyl,        C–
                                                                                                                                                   –O (aldehyde and
                   saturated alkyl C)         by O and N atoms)               (carbohydrate C)     C)              ester and amide C)             ketone C)
distinction in the carbon fraction, supporting its good thermal stability             close to the average value of two individual HTC hydrochars at mixing
at low HTC temperatures; hydrochar at 240 ◦ C exhibits a mild increase                ratio of 1:1, implying the capability of stable LC carbon component on
in Ar carbon at the expense of losing some COO and Alk carbons, sug                  the energy compensation of co-HTC hydrochar. (2) The significant
gesting its excellent energy preservation capacity at high HTC temper                reduction in O-Alk and the obvious increase in Alk mean the excessive
atures. Accordingly, as for co-HTC (taking 50% LC addition for                        hydrolysis of carbohydrates with the formation of some free alkyl
example), the carbon atoms in low-temperature hydrochar present                       structures, and the corresponding enhanced values (compared to theo
typical characteristics. (1) Ar carbon increases to a significant fraction            retical value) can demonstrate that the positive synergistic upgrading
Fig. 7. Comparisons of nitrogen functionalities in solid samples (raw feedstocks, targeting hydrochars).
                                                                               10
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                         Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
performance at low temperatures is mainly attributed to the enhanced               thermal stability of carbon and nitrogen functionalities in LC. In addi
hydrolysis of carbohydrates by active components in LC. Concerning                 tion, FTIR spectra of industrial biowastes and their typical derived
high-temperature co-HTC hydrochars, in addition to the sustained                   hydrochars can also provide supplementary evidence on the conversion
decrease in O-Alk carbon, the increase in the Ar carbon fraction (almost           of N-A types, as shown in Fig. 8. Compared to the feedstocks, hydrochars
51% higher than the theoretical value) is the principal characteristic,            formed by HTC have weakened peaks at 3090–3180 cm− 1 (NH2 stretch)
suggesting that the aromatization reaction promoted by the interactions            and 1540–1570 cm− 1 (N-H in the plane) and enhanced peaks at
of two feedstocks is responsible for the positive synergy in upgrading             1320 cm− 1 (aromatic C-N stretch) and 750–850 cm− 1 (N-H out of
indicators at high temperatures.                                                   plane). These two opposite peak categories are linked with aliphatic and
                                                                                   aromatic N-A, respectively [20,40,43]. This result can explain the hy
3.5.2. Structural characteristics of solid-nitrogen from the co-HTC                drothermal transformation of N-A types via deamination and dimer
    For another, based on the detailed XPS identification (Fig. S6), the           ization reactions. However, those peaks relating to aliphatic and
changes in nitrogen functionalities among different solid samples were             aromatic N-A in co-HTC hydrochars (e.g., mixing ratio of 1:1) weaken
compared in Fig. 7.                                                                remarkably, further demonstrating that co-HTC can promote the con
    As illustrated in Fig. 7, with increasing LC proportion, a significant         version of solid N-A types, which probably tend toward liquid-N species,
reduction in N-A and an increase in some heterocyclic-N, such as N-5               achieving the denitrogenation of hydrochar products.
and N-6, are the main features of co-HTC hydrochars at the two tem
peratures, especially at high temperature. This observation verifies that          4. Conclusions
a higher LC ratio and temperature facilitate nitrogen functionalities with
stronger thermal stability in co-HTC hydrochars. As confirmed in Sec                  Conventional HTC had a coupled upgrading and denitrogenation
tion 3.2.3, LC contains much less nitrogen and more stable nitrogen                capacity to produce high-grade and low nitrogen-containing hydrochars
functionalities than industrial biowastes. Notably, the LC in the blend is         from industrial biowastes and LC, exhibiting a much more intense effect
likely to be a nitrogen stabilizer with insufficient nitrogen contribution.        on industrial biowastes than on LC. Additionally, each indicator refer
When co-HTC occurs at low temperatures, hydrochar contains abundant                ring to upgrading (ERE, EDR) and denitrogenation (NRE, NRR) were
N-A and some heterocyclic-N. It can be confirmed that these                        divided into two temperature stages at 180 and 210 ◦ C, which were
heterocyclic-N types basically originate from LC based on the calcula             attributed to the competitive evolution pathways of corresponding
tion of nitrogen contribution. Accordingly, the prevailing pathway at              carbon and nitrogen functionalities controlled by hydrolysis or poly
this stage is the enhanced hydrolysis conversion of unstable N-A and N-            merization reactions. When the co-HTC was in the prevailing hydrolysis
IN into the liquid phase, which is responsible for the positive synergy of         (180 ◦ C) or polymerization (240 ◦ C) stage, an optimal addition of LC
denitrogenation indicators at low temperatures. When co-HTC is per                (25–50%) resulted in an increase in the experimental HHV, ERE, NRE
formed at high temperatures, hydrochar still contains a certain portion            and the decline in the experimental nitrogen content compared to their
of N-A in addition to the dominant heterocyclic-N, suggesting that the             calculated values, presenting significant positive synergistic effects of
conversion of stable N-A into heterocyclic-N is inevitable but con                co-HTC on both the upgrading and denitrogenation capacities. The
strained to some extent. In addition, nitrogen incorporation via the               maximal synergistic coefficients were observed at 7% and − 23% for the
Maillard reaction of liquid-N is also inhibited due to the increase in more        HHV and nitrogen content of hydrochars, respectively. Structural ana
stable carbon macromolecules in the system. Hence, restrained nitrogen             lyses of feedstocks and hydrochars indicated that the intrinsic motiva
immobilization is the critical factor for the positive synergistic deni           tions for these synergies were probably due to two factors: (1) good
trogenating capability at high temperatures. It is evident that the above          thermal stability of carbon/nitrogen functionalities in LC; and (2)
two synergistic denitrogenation mechanisms are associated with the                 favorable hydrolysis/polymerization reactions promoted by special LC
Fig. 8. FTIR spectra of industrial biowastes and their derived hydrochars (HTC, Co-HTC).
                                                                              11
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                                             Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
components or reaction sites. These findings suggested that co-HTC is a                          [13] D.C. Ma, G.Y. Zhang, P.T. Zhao, C. Areeprasert, Y.F. Shen, K. Yoshikawa, et al.,
                                                                                                      Hydrothermal treatment of antibiotic mycelial dreg: more understanding from fuel
potential strategy for preparing enhanced solid fuels with higher energy-
                                                                                                      characteristics, Chem. Eng. J. 273 (2015) 147–155.
density and lower nitrogen content from industrial biowaste and low-                             [14] X.Z. Zhuang, H. Zhan, Y.P. Song, C. He, Y.Q. Huang, X.L. Yin, et al., Insights into
rank coal, especially from wet nitrogen-rich industrial biowastes.                                    the evolution of chemical structures in lignocellulose and non-lignocellulose
                                                                                                      biowastes during hydrothermal carbonization (HTC), Fuel 236 (2019) 960–974.
                                                                                                 [15] J.H. Wu, J.Z. Liu, X. Zhang, Z.H. Wang, J.H. Zhou, K.F. Cen, Chemical and
CRediT authorship contribution statement                                                              structural changes in XiMeng lignite and its carbon migration during hydrothermal
                                                                                                      dewatering, Fuel 148 (2015) 139–144.
                                                                                                 [16] H. Ullah, G.J. Liu, B. Yousaf, M.U. Ali, Q. Abbas, C.C. Zhou, et al., Hydrothermal
   Hao Zhan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original                                       dewatering of low-rank coals: Influence on the properties and combustion
draft, Visualization, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Shihui Zhang:                               characteristics of the solid products, Energy 158 (2018) 1192–1203.
Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision. Yanpei Song:                                [17] Y.X. Zhang, J.J. Wu, Y. Wang, Z.Y. Miao, C.D. Si, X.L. Shang, et al., Effect of
                                                                                                      hydrothermal dewatering on the physico-chemical structure and surface properties
Software, Resources, Formal analysis, Data curation. Guozhang Chang:
                                                                                                      of Shengli lignite, Fuel 164 (2016) 128–133.
Project administration, Funding acquisition, Resources. Xinming                                  [18] X.F. Feng, C. Zhang, P. Tan, X.P. Zhang, Q.Y. Fang, G. Chen, Experimental study of
Wang: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Funding                                     the physicochemical structure and moisture readsorption characteristics of
                                                                                                      Zhaotong lignite after hydrothermal and thermal upgrading, Fuel 185 (2016)
acquisition. Zhiyong Zeng: Supervision, Project administration.
                                                                                                      112–121.
                                                                                                 [19] J.J. Liao, Y. Fei, M. Marshall, A.L. Chaffee, L.P. Chang, Hydrothermal dewatering
                                                                                                      of a Chinese lignite and properties of the solid products, Fuel 180 (2016) 473–480.
Declaration of Competing Interest                                                                [20] T.F. Wang, Y.B. Zhai, Y. Zhu, C. Peng, B.B. Xu, T. Wang, et al., Influence of
                                                                                                      temperature on nitrogen fate during hydrothermal carbonization of food waste,
                                                                                                      Bioresour. Technol. 247 (2018) 182–189.
    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial                              [21] X.Z. Zhuang, Y.Q. Huang, Y.P. Song, H. Zhan, X.L. Yin, C.Z. Wu, The
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence                             transformation pathways of nitrogen in sewage sludge during hydrothermal
the work reported in this paper.                                                                      treatment, Bioresour. Technol. 245 (2017) 463–470.
                                                                                                 [22] X.Z. Zhuang, H. Zhan, Y.Q. Huang, Y.P. Song, X.L. Yin, C.Z. Wu, Denitrification and
                                                                                                      desulphurization of industrial biowastes via hydrothermal modification, Bioresour.
Acknowledgments                                                                                       Technol. 254 (2018) 121–129.
                                                                                                 [23] Q. Mo, J.J. Liao, L.P. Chang, A.L. Chaffee, W.R. Bao, Transformation behaviors of
                                                                                                      C, H, O, N and S in lignite during hydrothermal dewatering process, Fuel 236
   The authors would like to acknowledge the National Natural Science                                 (2019) 228–235.
Foundation of China (Grant No. 51906247, 52074348, 41961144029),                                 [24] Q. Li, Z.H. Wang, Z.M. Lin, Y. He, K. Zhang, R. Whiddon, et al., Influences of
the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No.                                  hydrothermal modification on nitrogen thermal conversion of low-rank coals,
                                                                                                      Energy Fuel 30 (2016) 8125–8133.
2020A1515011336), the Science and Technology Program of Guangz                                  [25] Z.H. Wang, Q. Li, Z.M. Lin, R. Whiddon, K.Z. Qiu, M. Kuang, et al., Transformation
hou (Grant No. 202002030421) and the Foundation of State Key Lab                                     of nitrogen and sulphur impurities during hydrothermal upgrading of low quality
oratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical                                     coals, Fuel 164 (2016) 254–261.
                                                                                                 [26] M. Zulfiqar, B. Moghtaderi, T.F. Wall, Flow properties of biomass and coal blends,
Engineering (Grant No. 2019-KF-20) for financial support to this work.                                Fuel Process Technol. 87 (2006) 281–288.
                                                                                                 [27] S. De, M. Assadi, Impact of cofiring biomass with coal in power plants - a techno-
                                                                                                      economic assessment, Biomass Bioenergy 33 (2009) 283–293.
Appendix A. Supporting information
                                                                                                 [28] A. Saba, P. Saha, M.T. Reza, Co-Hydrothermal carbonization of coal-biomass blend:
                                                                                                      Influence of temperature on solid fuel properties, Fuel Process Technol. 167 (2017)
   Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the                                711–720.
online version at doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.107540.                                                [29] J. Mumme, M.M. Titirici, A. Pfeiffer, U. Luder, M.T. Reza, O. Masek, Hydrothermal
                                                                                                      carbonization of digestate in the presence of zeolite: process efficiency and
                                                                                                      composite properties, Acs Sustain. Chem. Eng. 3 (2015) 2967–2974.
References                                                                                       [30] X.J. Zhang, L. Zhang, A.M. Li, Hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge
                                                                                                      and pinewood sawdust for nutrient-rich hydrochar production: Synergistic effects
                                                                                                      and products characterization, J. Environ. Manag. 201 (2017) 52–62.
 [1] T.Y. Mun, T.Z. Tumsa, U. Lee, W. Yang, Performance evaluation of co-firing various
                                                                                                 [31] Q.Q. Lang, Y.C. Guo, Q.F. Zheng, Z.G. Liu, C. Gai, Co-hydrothermal carbonization
     kinds of biomass with low rank coals in a 500 MWe coal-fired power plant, Energy
                                                                                                      of lignocellulosic biomass and swine manure: Hydrochar properties and heavy
     115 (2016) 954–962.
                                                                                                      metal transformation behavior, Bioresour. Technol. 266 (2018) 242–248.
 [2] S. Onenc, S. Retschitzegger, N. Evic, N. Kienzl, J. Yanik, Characteristics and
                                                                                                 [32] C. He, Z. Zhang, C.F. Ge, W. Liu, Y.T. Tang, X.Z. Zhuang, et al., Synergistic effect of
     synergistic effects of co-combustion of carbonaceous wastes with coal, Waste
                                                                                                      hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge with fruit and agricultural wastes
     Manag. 71 (2018) 192–199.
                                                                                                      on hydrochar fuel quality and combustion behavior, Waste Manag. 100 (2019)
 [3] X.Z. Zhuang, H. Zhan, Y.Q. Huang, Y.P. Song, X.L. Yin, C.Z. Wu, Conversion of
                                                                                                      171–181.
     industrial biowastes to clean solid fuels via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC):
                                                                                                 [33] C.P. Zheng, X.Q. Ma, Z.L. Yao, X.F. Chen, The properties and combustion behaviors
     Upgrading mechanism in relation to coalification process and combustion
                                                                                                      of hydrochars derived from co-hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and
     behavior, Bioresour. Technol. 267 (2018) 17–29.
                                                                                                      food waste, Bioresour. Technol. (2019) 285.
 [4] Z.H. Rao, Y.M. Zhao, C.L. Huang, C.L. Duan, J.F. He, Recent developments in
                                                                                                 [34] D. Kim, S. Park, K.Y. Park, Upgrading the fuel properties of sludge and low rank
     drying and dewatering for low rank coals, Prog. Energ. Combust. 46 (2015) 1–11.
                                                                                                      coal mixed fuel through hydrothermal carbonization, Energy 141 (2017) 598–602.
 [5] M. Nonaka, T. Hirajima, K. Sasaki, Upgrading of low rank coal and woody biomass
                                                                                                 [35] Y.P. Song, H. Zhan, X.Z. Zhuang, X.L. Yin, C.Z. Wu, Synergistic characteristics and
     mixture by hydrothermal treatment, Fuel 90 (2011) 2578–2584.
                                                                                                      capabilities of co-hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge/lignite mixtures,
 [6] J.T. Wei, M. Wang, F.C. Wang, X.D. Song, G.S. Yu, Y.R. Liu, et al., A review on
                                                                                                      Energy Fuel 33 (2019) 8735–8745.
     reactivity characteristics and synergy behavior of biomass and coal Co-gasification,
                                                                                                 [36] H. Zhan, X.L. Yin, Y.Q. Huang, H.Y. Yuan, C.Z. Wu, NOx precursors evolving during
     Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46 (2021) 17116–17132.
                                                                                                      rapid pyrolysis of lignocellulosic industrial biomass wastes, Fuel 207 (2017)
 [7] P.T. Zhao, Y.F. Shen, S.F. Ge, Z.Q. Chen, K. Yoshikawa, Clean solid biofuel
                                                                                                      438–448.
     production from high moisture content waste biomass employing hydrothermal
                                                                                                 [37] S.A. Channiwala, P.P. Parikh, A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid,
     treatment, Appl. Energy 131 (2014) 345–367.
                                                                                                      liquid and gaseous fuels, Fuel 81 (2002) 1051–1063.
 [8] J.T. Wei, Q.H. Guo, X.D. Song, L. Ding, A. Mosqueda, Y.R. Liu, et al., Effect of
                                                                                                 [38] T.F. Wang, Y.B. Zhai, Y. Zhu, C.T. Li, G.M. Zeng, A review of the hydrothermal
     hydrothermal carbonization temperature on reactivity and synergy of co-
                                                                                                      carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions,
     gasification of biomass hydrochar and coal, Appl. Therm. Eng. (2021) 183.
                                                                                                      fundamentals, and physicochemical properties, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 90 (2018)
 [9] J.D. Yu, C.Y. Jiang, Q.Q. Guan, J.J. Gu, P. Ning, R.R. Miao, et al., Conversion of
                                                                                                      223–247.
     low-grade coals in sub-and supercritical water: A review, Fuel 217 (2018)
                                                                                                 [39] A.T. Mursito, T. Hirajima, K. Sasaki, Upgrading and dewatering of raw tropical
     275–284.
                                                                                                      peat by hydrothermal treatment, Fuel 89 (2010) 635–641.
[10] A. Funke, F. Ziegler, Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and
                                                                                                 [40] C. He, J. Zhao, Y.H. Yang, J.Y. Wang, Multiscale characteristics dynamics of
     discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering, Biofuel Bioprod.
                                                                                                      hydrochar from hydrothermal conversion of sewage sludge under sub- and near-
     Biorefin. 4 (2010) 160–177.
                                                                                                      critical water, Bioresour. Technol. 211 (2016) 486–493.
[11] C. He, A. Giannis, J.Y. Wang, Conversion of sewage sludge to clean solid fuel using
                                                                                                 [41] C. Peng, Y.B. Zhai, Y. Zhu, T.F. Wang, B.B. Xu, T. Wang, et al., Investigation of the
     hydrothermal carbonization: Hydrochar fuel characteristics and combustion
                                                                                                      structure and reaction pathway of char obtained from sewage sludge with biomass
     behavior, Appl. Energy 111 (2013) 257–266.
                                                                                                      wastes, using hydrothermal treatment, J. Clean. Prod. 166 (2017) 114–123.
[12] P.T. Zhao, Y.F. Shen, S.F. Ge, K. Yoshikawa, Energy recycling from sewage sludge
                                                                                                 [42] C. He, K. Wang, Y.H. Yang, P.N. Amaniampong, J.Y. Wang, Effective nitrogen
     by producing solid biofuel with hydrothermal carbonization, Energy Convers.
                                                                                                      removal and recovery from dewatered sewage sludge using a novel integrated
     Manag. 78 (2014) 815–821.
                                                                                            12
H. Zhan et al.                                                                                                           Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107540
     system of accelerated hydrothermal deamination and air stripping, Environ. Sci.            [45] J.R. Pels, F. Kapteijn, J.A. Moulijn, Q. Zhu, K.M. Thomas, Evolution of nitrogen
     Technol. 49 (2015) 6872–6880.                                                                   functionalities in carbonaceous materials during pyrolysis, Carbon 33 (1995)
[43] H. Zhan, X.Z. Zhuang, Y.P. Song, X.L. Yin, C.Z. Wu, Insights into the evolution of              1641–1653.
     Fuel-N to NOx precursors during pyrolysis of N-rich nonlignocellulosic biomass,            [46] J. Mumme, M.-M. Titirici, A. Pfeiffer, U. Lüder, M.T. Reza, O. Mašek, Hydrothermal
     Appl. Energy 219 (2018) 20–33.                                                                  carbonization of digestate in the presence of zeolite: process efficiency and
[44] C. Falco, M. Sevilla, R.J. White, R. Rothe, M.M. Titirici, Renewable nitrogen-doped             composite properties, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 3 (2015) 2967–2974.
     hydrothermal carbons derived from microalgae, Chemsuschem 5 (2012)
     1834–1840.
13