Activity 1
Choose one bioethical issue. Describe and write your own opinion about it. ( 300
words).
Suicide is a deeply complex and tragic act that involves the intentional taking of one's
own life. It's a global public health concern that transcends age, gender, ethnicity, and
socio-economic status, affecting individuals and communities worldwide. The reasons
behind suicide are multifaceted, often stemming from a complex interplay of mental
health issues, social factors, trauma, and individual circumstances.
In my view, discussing suicide openly and compassionately is pivotal in addressing this
sensitive issue. It's crucial to dismantle the stigma surrounding mental health, allowing
individuals to seek help without fear of judgment. Encouraging conversations about
mental health struggles and offering support networks can be instrumental in preventing
suicides. Building awareness and understanding around mental health challenges are
crucial steps toward early identification, intervention, and support.
Moreover, destigmatizing mental health disorders and emphasizing the importance of
seeking professional help can save lives. Accessible mental health services, including
counseling, therapy, and crisis intervention hotlines, should be widely available to
provide timely support to individuals in distress. Creating supportive environments within
communities and fostering a culture that values mental health and well-being can serve
as protective factors against suicide.
Additionally, addressing societal factors such as social isolation, bullying, discrimination,
economic hardship, and access to lethal means is imperative in suicide prevention
efforts. Strategies aimed at reducing these risk factors and promoting resilience,
connectedness, and coping mechanisms can significantly contribute to preventing
suicides.
Ultimately, suicide prevention requires a collective effort involving governments,
healthcare systems, educational institutions, communities, families, and individuals. By
prioritizing mental health education, removing barriers to accessing mental health
services, and fostering supportive environments, we can work together to prevent
suicides and provide hope and support to those in need. Every life lost to suicide is a
tragedy, emphasizing the urgency and importance of concerted action to address this
critical issue.
                                  Activity 2
Answer the following questions.
   A. List your top 3 personal values, not in any particular order.
           Equality
           Loyalty
           Positivity
   B. Do these values make you feel good about yourself?
           Yes, because these are qualities that can contribute positively to one's
             sense of self and well-being.
   C. Are you proud of your top three values?
           Yes
   D. Would you be comfortable and proud to tell your values to people you
      respect and admire?
           Yes
   E. Do these values represent things you would support, even if your choice
      isn't popular, and it puts you in the minority?
           Yes, personal values often guide individuals to support certain beliefs
             or principles even if those choices aren't popular or if they place
             them in the minority. People may prioritize their values over popular
             opinion to maintain integrity and stay true to what they believe is
             right.
   F. What does it mean to have values?
           Having values means having a set of principles or beliefs that guide
             and influence your attitudes, behaviors, and decisions in life.
   G. Why are personal values important?
           Personal values are important because they serve as a guiding
             framework that shapes decisions, behaviors, and priorities, providing
             a sense of purpose, direction, and integrity in life.
                               Activity 3
                  Case Study (Baby Theresa)
Answer:
    1. How do we put a value on human life?
H. It might be difficult to value human life, particularly in complicated situations
   like the one involving Baby Theresa. Given her illness, the use of her
   organs for donation in this instance raised ethical questions. But because
   there are different moral, legal, and cultural perspectives, determining the
   ultimate value of a human life—whether it be in terms of money or ethics—
   remains morally difficult and subjective. Discussions concerning the
   sanctity of life, the ethical ramifications of organ donation, and the quality of
   life for those with life-threatening illnesses were spurred by this instance. In
   the end, establishing a precise value for a human life is difficult, and moral
   conundrums such as these frequently necessitate complex debates about
   many ethical precepts and unique situations.
    2. What should one do when there is a conflict between the law and one's
        own moral position about an issue?
I. When facing a conflict between the law and one's moral position regarding
   an issue, particularly in a case like Baby Theresa's, it's essential to seek
   guidance from ethical principles, professional advice, and potentially legal
   counsel. Individuals may explore avenues for advocating for changes in the
   law through proper channels while considering the ethical implications of
   their actions. Respecting the law is crucial, but navigating such conflicts
   may involve engaging in ethical discourse, seeking legal advice, and
   pursuing avenues to address the issue through appropriate channels, such
   as legislative processes or ethical discussions in relevant forums.
    3. If you were in a position to make the final decision in this case, what
        would it be and why?
J. In case like Baby Theresa’s, a well-rounded strategy might put the infant's
   palliative care first while still honoring her life and dignity and taking into
   account the applicable legal and ethical frameworks at the moment.
                                  Activity 4
                 Case Study (Emails Exposed)
Answer
  1. Should universities be allowed to monitor student email and social media
     accounts? If so, under what circumstances?
  K. Universities should only monitor student email and social media accounts under
     specific circumstances such as ensuring campus safety, complying with the law,
     investigating academic integrity violations, and adhering to clear institutional
     policies. In the case study "Email Exposed," if there was a breach leading to
     public access to student emails, universities should take immediate steps to
     address the breach, notify affected individuals, and prevent future breaches while
     respecting student privacy.
  2. What crosses the line between campus safety and invasion of privacy?
  L. In the case study "Emails Exposed," the line between campus safety and
     invasion of privacy is crossed when monitoring extends beyond necessary
     measures to protect the safety of students and the campus community, infringing
     excessively on the privacy rights of individuals. This could occur if monitoring
     involves unwarranted and extensive surveillance of private communications
     without legitimate reasons related to safety, compliance with the law, or
     addressing specific concerns related to academic integrity or policy violations.
  3. Are university rules regarding email and social media monitoring too vague? If
     so, how can these rules be changed for more clarity?
  M. Yes, university rules regarding email and social media monitoring might be too
     vague in the case study "Emails Exposed." To enhance clarity, these rules
     should be revised to clearly specify the circumstances under which monitoring is
     permissible, outlining precise conditions related to safety concerns, legal
     compliance, academic integrity, and policy violations. Providing detailed
     guidelines and examples can offer students a clearer understanding of when and
     why monitoring might occur, ensuring transparency and protecting privacy rights.
  4. Should Robert have been punished for cheating in class if he did not know his
     email was being monitored? What about his tutor?
  N. Robert's right to privacy may be violated if he was punished only for
     information gleaned from unapproved monitoring, even if he was not aware
     that his emails were being watched. Concerns regarding the authenticity of
     the evidence and the tutor's accountability for using it may arise in relation
     to the tutor's use of information gleaned via unauthorized monitoring to
     report Robert.
                                 Activity 5
Make an acrostic about the importance of Ethics
E - Elevating moral standards,
T - Thinking conscientiously,
H - Honoring values and principles,
I - Implementing fairness and integrity,
C - Cultivating a responsible society,
S - Setting ethical benchmarks.