Jurnal PPP
Jurnal PPP
See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Temporary business model
innovation –SMEs’ innovation
response to the Covid-19 crisis
Thomas Clauss1,2,* , Matthias Breier3,
Sascha Kraus4 , Susanne Durst5 and Raj V. Mahto6
1
  Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str.
50, Witten, 58455, Germany.
2
  Department of Technology and Innovation, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Thomas.clauss@uni-wh.de
3
  Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, 53850, Finland
4
  Faculty of Economics & Management, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, 39100, Italy
5
  Department of Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 12616, Estonia
6
  Anderson School of Management, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131,
USA
      The Covid-19 crisis has hit SMEs particularly hard. Numerous business models (BM) have
      been limited or rendered downright impossible due to decreased social contact. SMEs can
      respond to this exogenous crisis via temporary business model innovation (BMI). This
      empirical study investigates these temporary BMs using a multiple case study approach
      based on five SMEs in Austria, Germany, and Liechtenstein who within a short period of
      time applied their core competencies and networks to integrate new BMs, which were in
      some cases very different from existing ones. These had a positive effect on strategic flexibil-
      ity, and if desired can also be incorporated into the firm long-term. The paper contributes
      to SME crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic by pointing out and developing
      a successful management mechanism that allows to survive a crisis or even improve during
      this time. Moreover, we contribute to BMI literature by explaining temporary BMI as a new
      form of BMI. It also makes clear to managers that temporary BMs add value to firms and
      create new revenue streams.
294                                    © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                    This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use,
                                         distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
                                                                                                                          14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                               Temporary business model innovation
     Small and medium-      sized firms (SMEs) are            temporary BMI in response to Covid-19 and what
  particularly vulnerable to crises (Shepherd, 2003;           effects this has. This question aims to achieve a
  Kraus et al., 2013). Resource scarcity and lack of           deeper understanding of SMEs’ crisis management
  preparedness have restricted their strategic choices         mechanisms.
  in managing the Covid-19 crisis (Eggers, 2020).                 By analyzing the case data of five firms who had
  SMEs are usually not diversified, but instead                a temporary BMI early in the Covid-19 crisis, we
  rely on only one specific BM (Pal et al., 2012).             make two important contributions to the literature.
  Furthermore, banks associate SMEs with higher                First, we add to the SME crisis management litera-
  risks, thus limiting their options for debt financing        ture (e.g., Eggers, 2020) and the growing stream of
  during crises (Piette and Zachary, 2015). On the             studies proposing innovation and temporary BMI as
  other hand, SMEs are flexible, entrepreneurial, and          potential strategies to cope with the Covid-19 cri-
  embedded in communities, and have been shown to              sis (Chesbrough, 2020; Kraus et al., 2020a; Wenzel
  possess unique capabilities to mount an effective            et al., 2020). Especially, SMEs due to their liabilities
  response to a crisis and ultimately emerge stron-            (Eggers, 2020) have to engage in innovative strate-
  ger (Ter Wengel and Rodriguez, 2006; Dahles and              gies to survive in the long run. Second, we contribute
  Susilowati, 2015). Crisis management studies have            to the literature on BMI by showing that temporary
  primarily explored which characteristics and strat-          BMI which relies on existing core competencies and
  egies have helped SMEs survive (Eggers, 2020).               is positioned in nascent industries (Zook and Allen,
  Factors such as young firm age (Simón-         Moya         2003) is a viable way to change an organization as
  et al., 2016), management expertise (Giannacourou            a response to changing external conditions. In con-
  et al., 2015), and market orientation (Petzold et al.,       trast to existing research (e.g., Clauss et al., 2021),
  2019) have been shown to be positively related to            we demonstrate that BMI as a response to chang-
  SMEs’ crisis performance. Studies have also con-             ing external circumstances must not necessarily be
  cluded that SMEs’ innovative stances and entrepre-           radical and irreversible but can be a more tactical
  neurial orientation are helpful for surviving a crisis       approach to temporary adapting the organization
  (e.g., Eggers and Kraus, 2011; Vargo and Seville,            e.g., if a crisis is to be faced.
  2011). Beliaeva et al. (2020) relate this effect to
  their ability to identify opportunities during crises.
  But despite these initial findings, surprisingly lit-        2. Theoretical foundation
  tle is known about how SMEs can best cope with
  severe crises.                                               2.1. Firms’ response to a crisis
     We add to this research discourse by analyzing
  the reactions of SMEs to the Covid-19 crisis. This          According to Pearson and Clair (1998), an organi-
  pandemic provides a unique context for studying              zational crisis is defined as ‘…a low probability,
  how firms can cope with a crisis if their existing           high-impact event that threatens the viability of
  BM suddenly becomes infeasible. Wenzel et al.                the organization’ (p. 60). The Institute for Crisis
  (2020) proposed four different strategies for firms          Management (ICM) (2004) divides crises into two
  to respond to a crisis: retrenchment, persevering,           primary types: sudden and smoldering. Sudden
  innovating, and exit. In line with the arguments             crises are the unexpected external events in which
  above, we focus our study on the opportunity for             the organization has virtually no control and lim-
  SMEs to overcome a crisis through innovation                 ited fault or responsibility. The Covid-    19 pan-
  and temporary business model innovation (BMI).               demic can be viewed as an example of this type
  We argue that as the unique characteristics of this          of crisis. Smoldering crises are those events that
  crisis have seriously affected the BMs of many               start out as small, internal problems within a firm,
  SMEs, these firms have had to come up with new               become public at some point, and over time esca-
  BMs at least for the duration of the crisis. In con-         late as a result of inattention and/or poor decisions
  trast to previous research that suggests that dual or        by management.
  multiple BMs can help firm diversification (e.g.,               Although no two crises are alike, research sug-
  Markides and Charitou, 2004; Aversa et al., 2017;            gests that they all have three common elements:
  Winterhalter et al., 2016), this context has cre-            surprise, threat, and short response time (Williams
  ated a situation in which a new BM is temporarily            et al., 2017). Scholars argue (e.g., Smith and
  required to survive the crisis while the established         Riley, 2012) that regardless of the type of crisis,
  BM is significantly reduced or even placed on                it requires immediate and decisive action by an
  hold. Against this background, the research objec-           organization. Hence, crisis management has been
  tive of this study is to explore how SMEs pursue             defined as ‘the systematic way in which members
© 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.     R&D Management 52, 2, 2022    295
                                                                                                                         14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Thomas Clauss, Matthias Breier, Sascha Kraus, Susanne Durst and Raj V. Mahto
of an organization, in conjunction with exter-               three interrelated key elements of value proposition,
nal stakeholders, work to avoid potential crises             value creation, and value capture (Clauss, 2017; Foss
and to minimize and resolve those that do occur’             and Saebi, 2017). These elements are configured
(Brumfield, 2012, p. 45). The available normative            as mutually enforcing systems that together define
guidance on managing a crisis suggests that man-             the gestalt of the organization (Martins et al., 2015;
agers should be prepared to make available more              Kulins et al., 2016). BMI is then defined as ‘designed,
time and resources to expand the required operat-            nontrivial changes to the key elements of a firm’s BM
ing space (Bowers et al., 2017). The need for con-           and/or the architecture linking these elements’ (Foss
tinued internal and external communication has               and Saebi, 2017, p. 207). BMI extends the scope of
been frequently highlighted here as well (Gilstrap           product and process innovation as key elements of
et al., 2016; Bowers et al., 2017).                          firms’ organization, along with when their configu-
   Wenzel et al. (2020) proposed four strategic              rations are changed (Foss and Saebi, 2017; Clauss
responses to a crisis: retrenchment, persevering,            et al., 2020). As a result, it provides firms with the
innovating, and exit. These strategies were shown as         opportunity to create novel activities that go beyond
effectively capturing the early responses of family          product and process innovation (Osiyevskyy and
firms to the Covid-19 pandemic (Kraus et al., 2020a).       Dewald, 2015). Studies show that competitive advan-
Retrenchment involves cost-       cutting measures that     tages can be achieved either by innovating compo-
may reduce the scope of a firms’ business activities.        nents of the BM or the entire BM (Berends et al.,
This strategy appears to support firms in surviving a        2016; Clauss et al., 2020). BMI therefore not only
crisis in the short run. Persevering is about preserv-       exists if radical changes are implemented, but can
ing the status quo of a firms’ business activities. This     also be the result of their more incremental recon-
may be achieved through debt financing, and seems            figurations (Velu and Jacob, 2016; Foss and Saebi,
suitable in response to a crisis in the medium run,          2017; Kraus et al., 2020b). Foss and Saebi (2017) dif-
even though it may threaten the long-term survival of       ferentiate BMI in terms of their newness and scope.1
the firm. Exit means the discontinuation of a firm’s         The first dimension captures the ‘degree of novelty
business activities; it is a strategy which is not limited   of the BMI.’ It differentiates whether a BMI is only
to a crisis, and can be selected at any time. Finally,       new for the firm (Johnson et al., 2008; Bock et al.,
innovating means that the firm engages in strategic          2012), or if it is completely new to the whole industry
renewal in response to a crisis.                             (Santos et al., 2009). The second dimension captures
   In contrast to the other mechanisms, an innova-           the BMI’s scope, defining how much of the existing
tion strategy to crisis management is the most future-      BM is affected by the innovation. In line with the
oriented because it may provide solutions on how to          above-mentioned ideas, the scope is the number of
use opportunities that emerge from a crisis. It has been     BM elements (i.e., value creation, value proposition,
shown that firms pursuing more explorative strate-           and value capture) that are changed by the BMI. If
gies toward new product and market developments              only one or a few elements of the BM are changed,
are those that cope better with crises (Archibugi            the scope of the BMI would be modular, whereas the
et al., 2013). In line with this, studies have shown         orchestrated reconfiguration of all elements of the
that SMEs’ innovative stances and entrepreneurial            BM would be termed architectural BMI (Foss and
orientations are helpful for surviving a crisis (e.g.,       Saebi, 2017). The more components that are changed
Eggers and Kraus, 2011; Vargo and Seville, 2011).            and the greater the novelty of the changes outside of
Considering how the Covid-19 crisis created a situ-         the firm, the more radical the BMI is. On the other
ation in which the existing BMs of many firms were           hand, incremental BMIs are based on only modular
suddenly placed on hold, managers should assess the          improvements of a firm’s existing BM.
impact of the crisis on their firms’ BM (Ritter and              Because complex BMIs require fundamen-
Pedersen, 2020) and may potentially seek out BMI as          tal changes in the organizational system (Berends
an effective opportunity (Kraus et al., 2020a).              et al., 2016), involve substantial redeployment of
                                                             resources (Doz and Kosonen, 2010), and are usu-
                                                             ally the consequence of a long-term strategy defined
2.2. Temporary BMI                                          by the firm (Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart, 2010),
The BM concept has received considerable theoret-            previous literature predominantly considered BMI
ical (Massa et al., 2017) and practical (Pohle and           as a firm’s enduring reconfiguration. Paradoxically,
Chapman, 2006) interest because it provides a use-           another stream of literature suggests that BMI may
ful perspective for understanding a firm’s business          be achieved by temporarily experimenting with new
and competitive logic. Scholars recently agreed that         BMs (Sosna et al., 2010; Andries et al., 2013) or by
BMs are conceptualized as configurations of the              creating temporary spin-off BMs (Chesbrough and
296   R&D Management 52, 2, 2022      © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                                                                                                                        14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                               Temporary business model innovation
  Rosenbloom, 2002; Clausen and Rasmussen, 2013;               value chain linkages and technologies (Aversa et al.,
  Markides, 2013) that may be reintegrated into the            2017).
  parent firm at a later date. Furthermore, it has often           We propose that temporary BMI are a poten-
  been proposed in start-ups that new BMs may require         tial mechanism for firms in responding to dramatic
  regular pivots in which their elements are adjusted          changes (i.e., demand and supply shocks). If they are
  based on market feedback (Felin et al., 2019). With          the result of the Covid-19 pandemic, they are a kind
  these studies in mind, we propose that BMI does not          of ‘extended environment.’ Initial evidence by Kraus
  inevitably lead to an enduring reconfiguration of the        et al. (2020a) indicate that European family firms
  organization, but that temporary BMIs are often pos-         utilized temporary changes in their BM as a direct
  sible or necessary for a period of time. We regard a         response to the Covid-19 crisis. Furthermore, Ritter
  temporary business model innovation as one which             and Pedersen (2020) have recommended that in
  is, at least at the time of its origination, not intended    response to the crisis, firms should consider changes
  as permanent. These temporary BMIs are assumed to            in a few core dimensions of the BMs. Gutierrez-
  be particularly appropriate if firms’ operating con-         Gutierrez et al. (2020) called for rapid responsible
  ditions significantly change, and more modular and           innovation as a sustainable response strategy to the
  less novel changes in the elements of the BM can             Covid-19 pandemic. Following these initial ideas,
  recreate or improve the competitive position.                together with the theoretical background of tempo-
      In contrast to more radical BMI, temporary BMI           rary BMI, we examined five firms that engaged in
  should be closely related to the strategy and core           temporary BMI as a direct response to the Covid-19
  competencies (Prahalad and Hamel, 1990) of the               crisis.
  firm. In line with Zook and Allen (2003), BMIs take
  place in adjacent spaces where firms can reuse exist-
  ing capabilities. Casadesus-Masanell (2010) shows           3. Methodology
  how BMs form as a consequence of strategic deci-
  sions, and as rather rigid configurations of the orga-       This study explores temporary BMIs in SMEs during
  nizational activity system. These structures however         crises. Kraus et al. (2020a) researched how firms
  leave some residual freedom for changes as a direct          adapt their BMs as a short-term response to cope
  response to changing external conditions, and as long        with crises. Although they reflected their findings
  as these changes are in line with the core competen-         into extant literature, that of Casadeus and Ricart
  cies and strategic orientation of the firm. Zott and         (2010), the understanding of temporary BMIs in
  Amit (2008) in a similar vein show that the alignment        SMEs is underdeveloped. This argued in favor of
  of the BM and the established product-market strat-         an exploratory multiple case study approach. A case
  egy is important for sustained competitive perfor-           study ‘attempts to examine: (a) a contemporary phe-
  mance. In turn, if BMIs are consistent with the firm’s       nomenon in its real-life context, especially when (b)
  core competencies, their limited strategic complexity        the boundaries between phenomenon and context are
  may make these more reversible, and they may be              not clearly evident’ (Yin, 1981, p. 59). This approach
  partially or fully undone if the external conditions         can be used to find answers to ‘how’ or ‘why’ ques-
  return to the previous state. Whatever the case, tem-        tions and addresses real-life problems (Yin, 2009).
  porary BMIs can still represent an optimal-use case         Furthermore, a case study design enables the investi-
  or prototype for long-term BM changes.                      gation of complex relationships and provides a basis
      Temporary BMI may not necessarily substitute for         for the development of theories (Flyvbjerg, 2006).
  the existing BM. In situations where the established         The use of multiple cases was considered effective
  BM cannot be pursued due to external conditions              for theory development, and the underlying replica-
  (e.g., regulations), new BMs will exist in parallel with     tion logic increases the likelihood of producing more
  the established BM. Previous research has empha-             robust and generalizable theory (Eisenhardt and
  sized that tensions between two parallel BMs may             Graebner, 2007).
  arise when they follow competing institutional log-
  ics (e.g., low cost vs premium) (Winterhalter et al.,
                                                               3.1. Selection of cases
  2016) or if they are competing for limited resources
  (Markides and Charitou, 2004). Studies have shown            The sample in this study included SMEs from
  that to overcome these potential issues, new (tempo-         Austria, Germany, and Liechtenstein. The search for
  rary) parallel BMs should be able to share resources         and selection of suitable SMEs was based on theoret-
  and activities (Snihur and Tarzijan, 2018), and should       ical sampling (Eisenhardt and Graebner, 2007). We
  furthermore be compatible and synergistic regarding          identified companies that were negatively affected
© 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.    R&D Management 52, 2, 2022   297
                                                                                                                       14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Thomas Clauss, Matthias Breier, Sascha Kraus, Susanne Durst and Raj V. Mahto
by the crisis and were thus in a need to strategically     slowly reopen following their Covid-19 lockdowns.
deal with the situation. Therefore, all our cases come     Due to the still-active social distancing measures and
from low-tech industries which were more severely         restricted border access, the interviews were con-
affected by the crisis. Here we identified SMEs that       ducted via the digital tool LoopUp, recorded with
responded to the crisis via an innovation strategy         the consent of the participants, and later transcribed.
(Wenzel et al., 2020) and operated with a tempo-           The interviewees also enabled access to further mate-
rary BMI (Kraus et al., 2020a). With help from the         rial including firm reports, sales lists, and marketing
local Chambers of Commerce, we identified firms            material. The interviewees furthermore agreed to be
who at the time of the study were already known to         contacted at a later date for any follow-up questions.
have innovated their existing BMs as a response to             The data analysis primarily followed inductive rea-
Covid-19. A total of twelve possible firms were iden-     soning (Creswell and Poth, 2016). It also took advan-
tified based on this. After double-checking whether       tage of the underlying ideas of thematic analysis.
these firms were really engaged in temporary BMIs,         This approach to data analysis searches for topics that
all of them were approached and asked whether they         appear important for the understanding of the phenom-
would participate in our study, with five of them          enon in focus (Fereday and Muir-Cochrane, 2006).
agreeing to do so.                                         Data reduction is here supported through segment-
                                                           ing, categorizing, and summarizing relevant concepts
                                                           within the data set being examined (Ayres, 2008).
3.2. Data collection and analysis                             The data analysis began by a research team
The data for the present study were collected from         member transcribing the recorded interviews. This
various sources, i.e., through semi-structured inter-     researcher took notes during this process, which
views; follow up calls; archive data such as e-mails,      supported not only the recording of why certain
internal reports, and presentations; and the firms’        data chunks were assigned to particular topics, but
websites and social media activity on Instagram and        the initial data interpretation as well. Once all tran-
Facebook as well as on-sight visits and observation       scripts were generated, the first step was to identify
of the new BMs. In doing this, we used multiple            all data related to a list of predetermined topics cov-
sources of evidence as recommended by Yin (2009)           ering three areas: (1) variance between the existing
to increase the overall quality of the case study and      and the temporary BM, (2) changes in BM elements,
triangulated the results of the interviews wherever        and (3) time perspective of the BM. Additional codes
possible.                                                  were assigned to the portions of data that represented
    An interview guide was created for the semi-          new topics (Saunders, 2012), further underlining the
structured interviews. Accordingly, a number of focal      selected inductive approach. This was done for each
topics were specified at the outset of the interviews.     case. New topics emerged as a result: branding and
Very specific questions had to be asked to develop         reputation issues, use of core competencies, effects
the necessary in-depth information about the new          on the existing BMs, and effects on the strategic flex-
BMs, their basis and initial effects, and to explore       ibility of a firm. To reduce the danger of misinterpre-
the underdeveloped BMI phenomenon (Guest et al.,           tation, all of the authors read through the transcripts
2006). More precisely, the content of the interview        and discussed the findings. Even though data from
guide focused on how the participating SMEs had            other sources was gathered and additionally included
dealt with the crisis to date; which measures were         in the above-mentioned process, priority was given
chosen and why; what the temporary BM looked               to the semi-   structured interviews. Once this pro-
like; how the process of implementation worked;            cess was completed, individual case reports were
and whether the firms had already been exposed to          prepared for each firm involved, which also formed
significant consequences and changes resulting from        the basis for a within-case analysis to be followed
their temporary BMI. Given the exploratory charac-         (Eisenhardt, 1989). The cross-case analysis aimed at
ter of the present study, it was not possible to rely on   highlighting the differences and similarities between
existing questionnaires, requiring new questions to        the cases involved (Eisenhardt and Graebner, 2007),
be formulated. The use of semi-structured interviews      which was supported by the topics identified in the
allowed the analysis of a complex situation and the        previous step. Moreover, comparison tables were
inclusion of the experiences and views of the partic-      produced to enable the cross-case analysis. This also
ipants involved in it (Graebner et al., 2012). A total     helped the researchers discuss the findings and agree
of eight interviews were conducted between April           on the relevant topics needed to address the research
30th and May 6th of 2020. This was during a time           aim. The detailed case descriptions can be found in
when the countries in the study had just started to        the Supplementary Information.
298   R&D Management 52, 2, 2022    © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                                                                                                                          14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                               Temporary business model innovation
© 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.     R&D Management 52, 2, 2022    299
          300
                                                                                             Table 1. Description of old and new BM based on the three BMI dimensions
                                                                                                         New            Produce and sell meat                              Sell meat to customers and further retail organic     Sales to customers through webpage, WhatsApp
                                                                                                                                                                             products                                              and on the farm
          © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                                                                           14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                               Temporary business model innovation
  now, and see different new possibilities for creating        changes in their systems and approaches were neces-
  revenue based on the new BM. A long-term imple-             sary. Although the entry into trade is atypical for clas-
  mentation is not planned at the moment, but was in           sical consulting firms, this firm has a long history in
  fact discussed in light of the positive participant feed-    trade and numerous contacts. The owner stated how
  back received from the events.                               the decision was obvious for him, and the new BM is
                                                               in line with his firm’s existing competencies and per-
  4.1.3. Case C –from pure cooking to selling toilet
                                                               sonal network. The new BM resulted in changes to
          paper, masks, and delivery service
                                                               all three elements, with the firm expanding value cre-
  This firm responded to the crisis by starting a new
  delivery service, transforming into a retail store for       ation from advising customers to providing disinfec-
  consumer goods selling toilet paper and masks. The           tants. The sale of disinfectants represented a change
  BMI can be described as adaptive (new to the firm            in the value proposition. The firm creates revenue as
  and architectural) as it is new to the firm to sell goods,   a retailer now, and no longer just with consulting,
  while others in the industry already established this        changing the element of value capture as well. The
  before. Moreover, large structural changes were nec-         idea emerged from the firm’s owner and through the
  essary which resulted in architectural changes. The          closer network, with its joint cooperation starting
  introduction of a delivery service was well-known           shortly after the idea was born. The new BM could be
  in the industry, but required new processes and staff        implemented at this speed mainly due to a flat hier-
  work profiles. The additional sale of consumer goods         archy and with the help of virtual organization with
  varies widely from the existing BM, creating further         network partners who joined their core competen-
  overall changes in the firm. And although the delivery       cies, with the case firm taking over the distribution
  service represented an extension of the firm’s value         of the product. Creating sales strategies was a core
  creation, the inclusion of consumer goods into the           competence that was already in place. After sales in
  restaurant’s product portfolio was less common and           Austria turned out to be profitable, the firm became a
  altered its value creation. This additionally changed        dealer to other countries as well, and the BM started
  the value proposition from the processing of food to         to be perceived as a long-term opportunity. Margins
  the sale of everyday consumer goods. By contrast,            are currently low, with attempts being made to force
  the value capture element hardly changed.                    other participants out of the market in the near future.
      The idea for this came primarily from the owner,         4.1.5. Case E –an organic farmer sets out on new
  with the delivery service quickly implemented. This                  paths
  required internal processes to be changed, and the           This firm produces and sells meat to private clients
  service staff trained accordingly (bring the food to         from its farm, and operates a digital organic farm
  the customers at their homes, not to a table in the          shop. Its BMI can be described as evolutionary (mod-
  restaurant). The BM for selling toilet paper was also        ular and new to the firm), as other farms follow the
  implemented very quickly, as the firm was able to            same system of a farm shop and only minor changes
  purchase it through existing supplier relationships          were necessary to change to the new customer seg-
  within their network. Masks were designed and man-           ment. It is mainly based on the same core competen-
  ufactured by a local tailor. In general, the financial       cies. Only some infrastructure had to be adapted to
  impact of the new BM was minimal compared to the             sell the meat directly on the farm. This firm changed
  losses from the Covid-19 lockdown. The delivery             its value creation from a pure on-site food seller to a
  service only added minimal value, and has already            digital shop. Furthermore, the live experience for the
  been partly reduced. Although the sale of masks and          customers on the farm is an important factor for the
  toilet paper was profitable for the firm, there were         firm; buying directly on the farm was still possible
  reasonable concerns about the impact on the firm’s           during the lockdown. While the value proposition is
  brand and reputation in the region. As a result, the         still the same (selling meat), the value capture of the
  margins on the products sold were low. The firm does         firm has changed. Prior to the crisis, the farm was a
  not plan to continue this BM beyond the Covid-19
                                                               B2B vendor and sold to restaurants only. However,
  crisis.
                                                               this income stream vanished during the crisis, forc-
  4.1.4. Case D –a classic consulting firm gets into         ing the farm to come up with new ideas; its new BM
          retail                                               was integrated quickly. In the near future, this firm
  This firm started distributing disinfectants via a           plans to expand its digital shop with other organic
  European distribution network in response to the cri-        regional products. As this firm has enjoyed a very
  sis. The BMI can be described as adaptive (architec-         strong brand image as an organic farm, there is a fear
  tural and new to the firm) as other consulting firms         of damaging this image with the wrong products in
  also work as sales companies, but for this firm major        the online shop. Furthermore, it hopes to not alter the
© 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.     R&D Management 52, 2, 2022    301
                                                                                                                        14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Thomas Clauss, Matthias Breier, Sascha Kraus, Susanne Durst and Raj V. Mahto
existing relationship with business customers with          of the pandemic, our main source of sales collapsed.
the new BM. In general, with the BMI, the new sales         Restaurants had to close. We therefore had to work
pillar provides greater strategic flexibility to react      even faster. That was incredibly important because
to situations, and has also enabled new contacts. In        we couldn’t sell anymore. But that is also how it will
the long run they aim to continue with the new BM,          be in the future, that we will sell directly to private
even though they expect that the original BM will be        individuals.’ Moreover, the companies that inte-
similarly important following the lockdown and the          grated temporary BMI with the intention to sustain it
reopening of restaurants.                                   over the long run mentioned that they also invested a
                                                            significant amount of resources. An important basis
                                                            for the introduction of a temporary BM is the initial
4.2. Cross-case analysis                                  idea and observed opportunity. This may come from
The following section concentrates on the cross-case       very different sources. In case A, an employee had
findings. We analyzed firms from different sectors          the idea, in case B an external management consul-
and situations, with overall propositions for further       tant, and in cases C, D and E the owner. The CEO in
research emerging upon closer inspection. Table 2           case A stated: ‘Our employee realized that the com-
provides an overview of the case results. Our results       petitors in more seriously affected regions already
indicate three important steps of a temporary BMI.          started to work on this opportunity. He convinced us
These steps are the trigger and reason for a tempo-         to also do this.’ The statement shows the flat hierar-
rary BMI, insights into the integration of a TBMI           chies and short command lines in SMEs and is an
and an outlook on the potential effects. Based on the       indication that in SMEs innovation can also be ini-
detailed analysis of the cases we could develop a table     tiated quickly by employees and external parties in
that highlights similarities and differences among the      order to master a crisis.
cases and allows the identification of some patterns
                                                            4.2.2. Finding 2 –integration process, branding
for temporary BMI. In particular our results of the
                                                                    and business model elements
cross-case analysis focus on the three areas along the
                                                            Most of the temporary BMs observed emerged from
process of temporary BMI: (1) The trigger and reason
                                                            the crisis (Cases A, B, C, and D). For these firms, the
for a temporary BMI. (2) The integration process and
                                                            rapid exploitation of their respective opportunity was
important issues. (3) The effects of temporary BMI.
                                                            of great importance. As a result of the crisis, capac-
A fourth section deals with patterns we identified in
                                                            ities were freed up in the firms to take advantage of
our data that provide more details on temporary BMI.
                                                            these opportunities. The CEO of case D explained:
4.2.1. Finding 1 –trigger and reasons for                 ‘In the course of the crisis, some major projects were
        temporary business models                           cancelled or postponed. This gave them enough time
The Covid-19 crisis was the trigger for all of the         to implement this business model quickly’ (Case D).
firms to temporarily adjust their BMs, with all of          Rapid implementation was achieved with the help of
them at least partially affected by the crisis, and         free capacities2 (Cases A and C), by external con-
Cases C and D highly affected. Only one case firm           sultants (Case B), and by using the existing network
has already worked on its new BM prior to Covid-19         (Cases C and D). Case E is the only one that car-
(Case E). For the rest of the firms the change was          ried out the implementation itself. One reason for the
based on newly emerging opportunities (Cases A,             rapid implementation of the temporary BMs was that
B, C, and D). ‘Everyone started using online tools          they were based on existing core competencies at
[for meetings and communication]. It was just more          all of the firms. The case firms created BMs around
familiar to our target group and I decided this is an       new opportunities but in line with their established
opportunity to do our networking activities online’,        competence base. The companies also described
so the consultant of case B. There are significant          how they used their core competencies: Case A who
differences in the time perspective of the new BMs.         primarily produces spirits could not sell the same
While two firms (Cases A and C) only wanted to              amount as restaurants were closed. They explained
implement their new BM during the lockdown, there           that they could build on their existing processes and
are two firms for whom the potential long-     term        competences of following a receipt and producing
development was a decisive reason to adapt (Cases D         and mixing different ingredients, when they started
and E). For firms seeking long-term integration, the       to produce disinfectant rather than spirits. Also in
relevance of the new BM is high, while for others it is     packaging and distribution they could build on exist-
only average or low. The owner of case E explained          ing capabilities. The CEO mentioned: ‘We don’t do
this relevance to us: ‘We have already started to           anything different today than we did in the past. We
change over shortly before the pandemic. Because            follow a recipe and mix the necessary ingredients
302   R&D Management 52, 2, 2022     © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                                                                                             Table 2. Cross-case results and main insights
                                                                                                                                                                                         Case A            Case B                Case C             Case D                        Case E
                                                                                             Situation overview                                    Degree to which the crisis            Partly affected   Partly affected       Highly affected    Highly affected               Partly affected
                                                                                                                                                     has affected1
                                                                                             Trigger and reasons for temporary BMI                 Reason for integration2               Opportunity       Opportunity           Opportunity        Opportunity                   Necessity
                                                                                                                                                   Perspective of temporary              Short-term       Long-term possible   Short-term        Long-term                    Long-term
                                                                                                                                                     BM
                                                                                                                                                   Source of innovative idea             Employee          External consultant   Owner              Owner/network                 Owner
                                                                                                                                                   Relevance of temporary                Average           Average               Low                High                          High
                                                                                                                                                     BMI3
                                                                                             How and what changed                                  Network                               Yes               Yes                   No                 Yes                           Yes
                                                                                                                                                   BMI typology                          Focused           Evolutionary          Adaptive           Adaptive                      Evolutionary
                                                                                                                                                   Variance with existing BM4            Far               Near                  Far                Near                          Near
                                                                                                                                                   Built on core competencies            Yes               Yes                   Yes                Yes                           Yes
                                                                                                                                                   Branding issues                       Yes               No                    Yes                No                            Yes
                                                                                                                                                   Value creation                        Changed           Same                  Changed            Changed                       Changed
                                                                                                                                                   Value proposition                     Changed           Changed               Changed            Changed                       Same
          © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                                                                                                                                                   Value capture                         Same              Changed               Same               Changed                       Changed
                                                                                             Effects of temporary BM                               Effects on Network                    Yes               Yes                   No                 No                            Yes
                                                                                                                                                   Strategic flexibility                 Yes               Yes                   No                 No                            Yes
                                                                                             1
                                                                                               Self-reported affectedness of the firm through the crisis (partly affected or highly affected).
                                                                                             2
                                                                                               Self-reported reason why firms integrated into temporary BMI.
                                                                                             3
                                                                                               Self-reported relevance of the temporary BM for the firm in regard to business performance.
                                                                                             4
                                                                                               Individually assessed by all researchers on the basis of the changes to the BMI elements.
          303
14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                                                                        14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Thomas Clauss, Matthias Breier, Sascha Kraus, Susanne Durst and Raj V. Mahto
together to make a product.’ Case B, who had offline        the value capture element, which is not changed if
events with sponsors, for example still sees its            companies’ temporary BM is far from the existing
competence in matching the right people together.           one. This could be due to the fact that these firms
Instead of doing this offline they do it online now. As     do not plan to integrate the temporary BM into the
firms relied on these existing competences, residual        firm in the long-term, i.e., these changes will take
required competences that were not readily available        place while continuing to focus on existing BMs and
were very few and could be built up quickly via the         changes in value capture are more complex than in
existing network in order to be able to react quickly       other dimensions. Second, we could find that based
(Cases A, B, D and E). This made the implementa-            on the BMI Typology focused (new to the industry
tion of the temporary BMI very fast and efficient. We       and modular), evolutionary (new to the firm and
observed a considerable variance (Cases A and C)            modular) and adaptive (new to the firm and archi-
between existing and temporary BMs for those firms          tectural) BMI was used to establish a new BM. Two
who only see their BMI as a short-term opportunity.        companies (Cases C and D) followed an adaptive
On the other hand, firms who indicate that they are         BMI another two (Cases B and E) did an evolutionary
planning or are already working on a long-term con-        BMI while only one firm integrated a focused BMI
tinuation of their temporary BMI (Cases B, D, and           (Case A). The results indicate a relationship among
E) obviously conduct changes in their BM that are           adaptive BMI and the affectedness of the existing
generally more incremental in nature. Still, in gen-        BMI, which is further described in finding 4.
eral, even in the cases where more radical changes
were carried out, the existing core competencies            4.2.3. Finding 3 –the effects of temporary business
formed the decisive basis for establishing these BMs                models
(Cases A and C). For three firms (Cases A, C, and E),       The results showed that the introduction of a tem-
a good reputation and a strong brand belong to these        porary BM had positive effects on the case com-
core competencies. These firms were incidentally            panies. Cases A, B, and E noted positive effects on
concerned about the effects of the temporary BM on          their network. They mentioned that the heterogeneity
their brands (Case A, the most affected firm), thus         increased through new contacts which will help in
ensuring that the temporary BMI is aligned with the         different situations, moreover they highlighted the
existing brand reputation. An employee explained:           positive effects of contacts in various industries that
‘We produce high quality spirits and are now a man-         think about solutions differently. Finally they men-
ufacturer of disinfectants. We have to be incredibly        tioned that their total customer base increased as they
careful to draw a clear line here in communication.’        addressed new customer segments, which may allow
An analysis of the media, the homepage and their            them to address these with their original BM in the
social media accounts interestingly showed that these       future. In addition to our expectations, three cases
case firms even prevented to inform the public about        (Cases A, B, and E) described BMI creates benefi-
their newly integrated BM. Firms that have estab-           cial effects on strategic flexibility, which resulted
lished a significant, well-known brand among private       from a deeper reflection and understanding upon
customers in their daily business are more concerned        their own core competencies and the potential stra-
about their reputation than purely B2B firms. From          tegic opportunities that could be addressed through
this perspective, the organic farmer who has to pay         these. The companies realized that on this basis the
attention to the organic origin of the products sold in     dimensions of a BM can be successfully adapted to
his local and digital farm shop had to consider brand-      changing conditions. The CEO of case A explained
ing in order not to lose the trust of his customers.        their increased strategic flexibility in the following:
Secondary data show that they put a lot of emphasis         ‘We have seen what we are capable of when we enter
into communicating their organic status through-            a difficult situation. Our team has shown us that we
out their means of communication. The restaurant,           can also achieve sales in other areas when a change
which enjoys a solid reputation throughout its region,      is needed.’ The managing partner of case B further
also had to keep this in mind. All these firms had to       explained: ‘It was good to see that we are flexible
design their new BM in a way that did not damage            enough to adapt to this crisis. Our competitors just
the existing brand.                                         cancelled their events while we could still generate
    Our results indicate several changes in the BMI         revenue.’ Moreover, the new BMs allowed these
elements and different BMI typologies. First we see         firms to be more flexible through the generation of
that at least two of the three elements changed in all      additional revenue streams, helping to better adjust
of the cases. In one case (Case D), all three elements      to changed situations while working on new value
changed. A special situation could be analyzed for          creation.
304   R&D Management 52, 2, 2022     © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                                                                                                                           14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                               Temporary business model innovation
  4.2.4. Finding 4 –temporary business model                    The second pattern differentiates the perspective
          patterns                                             companies have on the new BMs. Companies who
  Despite the limited number of cases the results              planned a long-term continuation of their temporary
  indicate two general patterns in temporary BMI as            BMI show a different pattern of behavior as com-
  a response to crisis. The first pattern differentiates       pared to those companies with a rather short-term
  primarily those companies that are significantly             perspective. It is realizable that the strategic planning
  affected from those that were less negatively affected       horizon behind a temporary BM does have effects on
  by the crisis. This level of affectedness leads to dif-      the investment companies are willing to do, the dis-
  ferent results and directions. The crisis did not have       tance to the existing BM, branding and also the value
  the same effects on all the companies. The ones that         capture dimension. Companies that change their BM
  were affected to a greater degree (Case C and D) both        just for short-term survival are fine with a larger dis-
  engaged in adaptive BMI, which means that their              tance between the existing BM and the new BM. As
  innovation was new to the firm and architectural. As         they do not plan to implement it in the long-run they
  these companies were more constrained by the crisis,         are more concerned about their brand and that the
  they could no longer follow the existing BM. Due             temporary BMI could have negative influence on it.
  to the severity of restrictions they had to do archi-        Moreover, our data indicate that companies that only
  tectural changes in their BMs to generate new rev-           follow a short-term implementation try to keep going
  enues. This huge change of the existing BM created           with the same value capture as before. On the other
  a situation in which none of the effects we realized         side, companies that plan their new BMs for a long-
  with other companies (positive effect on network and         term perspective actively mention that they invested
  positive effect on strategic flexibility) could have         money to integrate the new BM. For example, an
  been discovered. On the other side companies that            onsite visit at Case E showed that they invested into
  were less negatively affected changed their BMI              new infrastructure to build cooling capacity and a
  more incrementally via modular changes and could             store on their farm.
  consistently benefit from the positive effects of the
  new BM on strategic flexibility, on the existing net-
  work and on the existing BM. They reported that              5. Discussion and conclusion
  they are more aware of their core competences and
  could easier respond to environmental changes based          5.1. Synthesis of key results
  on this experience in the future which allows them
  to be more flexible from a strategic perspective. On         In the following section we synthesize our results
  the other side they mentioned that they plan to lever-       and create five core propositions on temporary BMI.
  age the new contacts they reached with their BMI to          They explain the relationships of our core constructs
  do cross sales and develop innovative solutions for          and should encourage future research on this topic
  this new segment. Moreover, they mentioned that the          based on our empirical temporary BM foundation.
  experience during the creation of the temporary BM           At the end of this section we provide an overview on
  helped them to further develop the old BM.                   these propositions (Figure 1).
© 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.     R&D Management 52, 2, 2022    305
                                                                                                                         14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Thomas Clauss, Matthias Breier, Sascha Kraus, Susanne Durst and Raj V. Mahto
   This study focuses on SMEs and indicates that            through the newly gained experience and feedback
these companies use temporary BMI to survive a              outside their home industry, the network and their
crisis. SMEs are characterized by various criteria.         strategic flexibility. While other authors investigated
These include the liability of smallness, which means       strategic flexibility as an antecedent of BMI (Bock et
that SMEs have fewer resources available in times           al., 2012; Clauss et al., 2021). Schneider and Spieth
of crisis (Eggers, 2020). Due to the limited resource       (2014) experimentally showed that BMI indeed
availability, certain crisis management strategies          increases the strategic flexibility of firms across dif-
explained through Wenzel et al. (2020) could at             ferent dimensions. In line with this, our study showed
maximum be used for a short period of time. A pure          that those firms facilitating temporary BMI could
retrenchment or persevering strategy cannot be pur-         increase their strategic flexibility and may therefore
sued over a long time, without new revenue streams          develop a capability to better react to potential future
as a SME. Authors further explain that SMEs have to         crises (Muhic and Bengtsson, 2021). SMEs’ active
be innovative to survive turbulent environments (Le         responses create experiences in coping with complex
Nguyen and Kock, 2011), which is clearly indicated          situations, and the foundation for further BMIs as a
through our analysis. Thus, in particular for SMEs          result (this was explained by Zook and Allen (2003)
a proactive innovation strategy based on temporary          in the context of multinationals).
BMI seems to be a feasible solution to manage an
exogenous crisis. On the other side SMEs have lean             Proposition 2 An exogenous crisis serves as an
structures which allow them to be more innovative.             initiator of temporary BMIs in SMEs.
As our data show it is possible for employees and
external stakeholders to persuade the management               Proposition 2.1 If an exogenous crisis strongly
in SMEs to pursue new ideas. Furthermore, the                  affects an existing BM this leads to the implemen-
management is more directly involved in the firms’             tation of a temporary BMI through adaptive BMI.
operations, leading to direct and quick opportunity
recognition. Concluding SMEs are more likely to                Proposition 2.2 Under circumstances where an
engage in temporary BMI as other strategies are                exogenous crisis affects an existing BM only partly
not suitable for a long period and the lean structures         a temporary BMI has positive effects on the exist-
                                                               ing BM, strategic flexibility and increased business
allow them to easier implement new ideas.
                                                               network.
   Proposition 1 Temporary BMI is particularly ap-
   propriate for SMEs during crisis.                            While Kraus et al. (2020a) describe temporary
                                                            BM adjustment as a short-term response to crisis,
    Our cases clearly show that an exogenous crisis is      some of our cases clearly indicated that these com-
a trigger for temporary BMI. In all investigated cases      panies intend to transform temporary BMs into long-
the crisis triggered the innovation process. This is        term BM changes. For these cases their temporary
in line with existing literature describing that crises     BM is not only an opportunity that works during the
lead to new innovation opportunities (Brockner and          crisis but can also create revenues after it. In particu-
James, 2008). Saebi et al. (2017) explained that firms      lar those companies, whose temporary BMI is close
tend to adapt their BMs when they are under threat.         to the existing BM, are actively planning such a long-
In the case of an exogenous crisis, these opportuni-        term integration of their temporary BMI. If a BMI is
ties may be temporary. Temporary BMI differs in             only incremental and creates new revenue streams, it
companies that are severely or only partly affected by      is a case for long-term implementation. It is import-
the crisis. Significantly constrained companies may         ant to see future potential for the temporary BM after
be in a need to move further away from the actual           the crisis too and it should be compatible with the
BM in order to be able to create new sources of rev-        existing BM to prevent harming the core BM. In this
enue. These companies must do an adaptive BMI               situation it makes sense to integrate the new BM also
based on Foss and Saebi (2017) which forces the firm        in the long run, especially if it is possible to integrate
into architectural changes of the existing system.          it into the existing strategy.
Therefore, the changes in these companies are more              On the other side we observed companies that do
severely and they are not able to profit from positive      not plan a long-term integration of their temporary
effects on their network (new contacts in different         BMI. Interestingly, while these companies follow
industries to learn from or customers they can also         BMs that are more fundamentally different from
address with the original BM) or strategic flexibility.     their existing one they still do not change their value
Less constrained companies benefit from stronger            capture dimension. The larger distance to the exist-
positive effects of the new BM on the existing BM           ing BM allows them to do a short-term change to
306   R&D Management 52, 2, 2022     © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                                                                                                                            14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                               Temporary business model innovation
  create new revenue streams but it forces them to get         have a huge interest to protect their reputation and
  back to the old one if they would like to go with the        core BM. The reputation of our case companies is
  existing strategy (Casadesus- Masanell and Ricart,          often described as a core competence. They are well
  2010). Changes in the value capture dimension are            known in their industry and respected for good qual-
  more complex than the other dimensions and were              ity. Therefore, the creation of short-  term revenue
  shown to require system wide adaptions that could            streams through a temporary BMI must be possible
  not be achieved through temporary BMI (Clauss et             without risking this reputation. This effect is also
  al., 2021). This may explains why the case compa-            visible in other areas. In their study, Zook and Allen
  nies did not change their value capture for temporary        (2003) showed that growing firms are always careful
  BMI even if more radical BMI were conducted.                 not to weaken their existing core, and basically only
                                                               pursue one opportunity after another. This sequen-
     Proposition 3.1 Temporary BMI that are closer             tial approach results in easier processes and allows
     to the traditional BM of SMEs show potential for          a BMI to be implemented without harming the core
     long-term integration and may thus be a basis for        of the firm, keeping the possibility to go back to the
     long-term BMI.                                           core BM alive. Companies that plan to integrate their
                                                               temporary BM in the long run too are less afraid of
     Proposition 3.2 Temporary BMI that are far to the         harming their reputation. As proposition 3.1 and 3.2
     traditional BM of SMEs are only implemented for a         already explained these are also the companies where
     short-term perspective.                                  the existing BM is not that far from the new one. By
                                                               pursuing an incremental change of the BM the pos-
      Our results indicate that the quick response             sibility to harm the old one is more limited. On the
  through temporary BMI in SMEs is made possible               other side companies that are afraid their temporary
  as the case companies rely on existing competen-             BMI could harm their reputation are engaged in more
  cies and slack resources as a basis for their tempo-         radical changes of their BM.
  rary BMIs. Moreover, leveraging existing personal
  and business contacts increases the speed of BM                 Proposition 5 Temporary BMIs should be done
  implementation, especially during a time where free             without harming the existing BM.
  capacities are available due to restricted existing
  BMs. This demonstrates that temporary BMI may                   In total we proposed five core propositions with
  be facilitated through a firms core competency base.         individual sub-propositions that could better describe
  The literature examined how core competencies are            temporary BMI. Figure 1 summarizes all these prop-
  an essential factor for general BMI (Matzler et al.,         ositions into a model to show their overall con-
  2013). Moreover, it is suggested that incremental            nections and provide a better understanding of the
  BMI should be developed in line with core compe-             investigated variables.
  tencies (Prahalad and Hamel, 1990). Zook and Allen
  (2003) further explained that it is important to keep
                                                               5.2. Contribution to research
  situations of change manageable by building on
  existing capabilities and working one step at a time.        Our study makes two important contributions to the
  Changing environments lead to an increasing com-             literature. First, we contribute to the literature on cri-
  plexity, which can be handled using limited changes          sis management in SMEs by identifying and elabo-
  in the firm that build on existing competencies.             rating a management mechanism that allows firms to
  Leveraging the network and core competencies helps           survive and may even improve during a severe exog-
  to implement a BMI in SMEs.                                  enous crisis such as the one caused by the Covid-19
                                                               pandemic. A quick and successful response to crises
     Proposition 4 After an exogenous crisis core              is an important issue for SMEs due to their limited
     competencies leveraging is used for temporary BMI         size and lack of resources (Eggers, 2020). Our find-
     in SMEs.                                                  ings are in line with previous studies showing that
                                                               exploration strategies, engagement in innovation, and
     In line with this argument our findings further           entrepreneurial orientation may help firms to survive
  suggest that firms may implement temporary BM                a crisis (Eggers and Kraus, 2011; Vargo and Seville,
  quickly, albeit with foresight. This is illustrated by       2011). Beliaeva et al. (2020) relate the positive effect
  the obvious concern of our case companies that               of an entrepreneurial orientation during a crisis to
  temporary BMI my harm their brand reputation                 firms’ ability to identify opportunities during crises.
  and therefore their existing BM. Especially, com-            We substantially add to this previous knowledge as we
  panies that only create a new BM for the short run           further develop initial arguments on short-term BM
© 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.     R&D Management 52, 2, 2022     307
                                                                                                                        14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Thomas Clauss, Matthias Breier, Sascha Kraus, Susanne Durst and Raj V. Mahto
adaptions (Kraus et al., 2020a) and further explain         leading to BMIs that are less radical and address
the concept of temporary BMI as response strategy           adjacent industries. In general this finding is in line
for SMEs to create new revenue streams and increase         with ideas of the resource based view (Barney, 1991),
liquidity in cases were the existing BM is negatively       advocating strategy definition based on unique firm
affected by a crisis. Specifically, more incremental        resources. Companies that are aware of their own
adaptations of existing BMs provide opportunities           core competencies have the opportunity to scale in
for SMEs to test alternative BMs which can be pur-          adjacent domains through an adaption to a changed
sued during/following a crisis. In addition to that, our    environment based on emergent strategy and a tem-
research shows that going through a temporary BMI           porary BMI. This behavior creates new revenue
increases the strategic flexibility of firms, support-      streams in areas that are not or less affected by the
ing previous research of Ates and Bititci (2011) who        crisis and create a better chance of survival.
show that current change processes also increase                We show that temporary BMI is a successful cri-
SMEs resilience for future crises.                          sis management approach during exogenous crises
   Second, we contribute to the BMI literature by           when the core BM is severely affected by changing
substantiating temporary BMI as a new form of BMI.          external conditions. However, our finding may also
Kraus et al. (2020a) created the foundation for tem-        be more generalizable to BMI under other condi-
porary BMI as a short-term response to crisis. While       tions. Arguably, temporary BMI could also be a rel-
BMI as a response to changing external conditions           evant approach during normal times to help innovate
has been presented as a costly and time-consuming          BMs and test alternative ones. Through, such tem-
change that is radical by nature (Snihur et al., 2018;      porary BMI, new BMs can be tested, changed, and
Clauss et al., 2021), temporary BMIs create the pos-        improved. In line with previous research (Sosna et
sibility to more incrementally change the BM in a           al., 2010; Andries et al., 2013), temporary BMI con-
short period of time and with limited resources.            stitutes a resource efficient opportunity to experiment
This is possible as temporary BMI relies on exiting         with new BMs without putting the core BM at risk.
core competencies of the firm and thus –although           This experiment can lead to a long-term integration
the dimensions of the BM are altered –can reduce           of the new BM or to a change back to the existing
the challenge of a BMI (Prahalad and Hamel, 1990).          one. A key to pursuing an experimental approach
Therefore, our research brings a new perspective            based upon temporary BMI is not to endanger the
to the emergence and rigidity of BMs. Casadesus-           existing BM. We add to this discourse by showing
Masanell and Ricart (2010) initially explained that         that one important criterion to enable this process
BMs are the result of a firms long-term strategy. In       in incumbent firms is that the BMI relies on firms’
this view, these rather rigid structures could thus         existing core competencies and is connected to the
not be altered at a short-term basis and reactions to      core business (Zook and Allen, 2003). If the BMI is
changing environmental conditions could only be             setup to be temporary and draws on the core compe-
conducted through minor tactical maneuvering in the         tencies of the organization, a return to the core BM
scope of residual BM flexibility. In contrast to this,      is always possible, resulting in limited risks for the
we find that indeed, temporary BMI is possible under        firm. This option to return to the core BM is further
certain conditions. This may be explained based             enabled through a separation of the old and the new
on Mintzbergs (1978) idea of emergent strategies.           BM in time. Temporarily shifting to a different BM
Under extreme conditions such as a crisis caused            or running two BMs simultaneously is facilitated if
by a pandemic where the underlying assumptions of           the new temporary BM does not harm the old one
the deliberate strategy are not valid anymore firms         (Markides, 2013). Moreover, the proximity of a BMI
may develop these emergent strategies, which will           to the core competencies of the firm allows it to be
then be operationalized through a temporary BMI.            implemented quickly. A core BM does not need
We thereby show that despite previous assumptions,          to be forcibly reduced to implement a temporary
temporary changes of BMs are possible independent           BM, which could perhaps promote parallel syner-
of the deliberate long-term strategy of the firm.          getic BMs. In this vein, temporary BMI may be a
   However, our results clearly demonstrate that            potential approach to implement and manage mul-
these temporary BMI are established based upon the          tiple BMs (Winterhalter et al., 2016). As suggested
existing core competencies. Thus, although tempo-           by Markides (2013) a temporal separation may be
rary emergent strategies may lead to temporary BMI          a solution to manage two competing yet integrated
under situations where existing deliberate strategies       BMs. This may be facilitated through temporary
are rendered obsolete, these are still in line with the     BMI. Furthermore, the initial findings of this study
resource based foundations of the original strategy         indicate that in the long run existing BMs can also
308   R&D Management 52, 2, 2022     © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                                                                                                                             14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                               Temporary business model innovation
  benefit from temporary BMIs through an extension             identified in this research should be investigated
  of the network into new industries and an improved           in a quantitative analysis. Furthermore, due to the
  knowledge of the own core competencies.                      current timing, it is not yet possible to conclusively
                                                               say what effect the introduction of a temporary BM
                                                               will have on the overall performance of a firm, or
  5.3. Managerial implications                                any resurgences following a crisis. The long-term
  This study shows that a sudden and unexpected crisis         effects of temporary BMI on existing BMs as well
  can also unlock enormous potential for firms, pro-           as on firm performance will have to be the objective
  vided they are open-minded, willing, and prepared           of future research. Lastly, we focused on temporary
  to search for potential opportunities during a crisis.       BMI triggered by an exogenous crisis that forced
  Firms can recognize new opportunities in a rapidly-         firms to develop a new BM in order to ensure the
  changing environment, and must be aware of their             survival of their firm. However, this study did not
  core competencies to recognize opportunities that            investigate other more proactive antecedences of
  might be far removed from existing BMs. By exploit-          BMI as discussed in the literature, such as strategic
  ing their own network, and applying their own com-           agility (Clauss et al., 2020), learning (Berends et al.,
  petencies, unused resources can be quickly bundled           2016) or knowledge management (Hock-Doepgen
  into new BMs during a crisis. With a global crisis,          et al., 2021). Future research might therefore inves-
  these BMs can serve not only a purely economic               tigate the antecedences of temporary BMI besides
  purpose, but a social one as well. Rapid responsible         or in addition to the external shock caused by the
  innovation is an ‘innovation developed in a short            crisis. Moreover, the results in this study are only a
  period of time in a state of emergency with the hope         first analysis of temporary BMI. They are only one
  of protecting people and saving lives’ (Gutierrez-          possible way to pursue these kind of BMs. Future
  Gutierrez et al., 2020). Some of the firms examined          studies should refine this model and show differ-
  in the course of this study can be associated with this      ent approaches based on other cases or quantitative
  approach, and serve as examples of how to sustain-           research.
  ably operate long-term.
      In addition to the issue of sustainability, our study
  shows clear positive effects for firms. The introduc-        References
  tion of a temporary BM leads to positive effects on
                                                               Andries, P., Debackere, K., and Van Looy, B. (2013)
  the current BM. The understanding of the own BM
                                                                 Simultaneous experimentation as a learning strat-
  changes by looking at other industries and processes,          egy: business model development under uncertainty.
  and gaining new customer groups. Above all, rapid              Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7, 288–310.
  reaction by firms leads to increased flexibility and         Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A., and Frenz, M. (2013)
  reveals a firm’s potential. A sharpened view of the            Economic crisis and innovation: is destruction prevail-
  own core competencies can have long-term positive             ing over accumulation? Research Policy, 42, 303–314.
  effects.                                                     Ates, A. and Bititci, U. (2011) Change process: a key
                                                                 enabler for building resilient SMEs. International
                                                                 Journal of Production Research, 49, 5601–5618.
  5.4. Limitations and outlook                                Aversa, P., Haefliger, S., and Reza, D.G. (2017) Building
                                                                 a winning business model portfolio. MIT Sloan
  This study was dedicated to the analysis of tempo-
                                                                 Management Review, 58, 49–54.
  rary BMs, providing first insights into the effects          Ayres, L. (2008) Thematic coding and analysis. In: Given,
  they can have and how they can be implemented.                 L.M. (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative
  Numerous other propositions have arisen as a result.           Research Methods, Vol. 1. Los Angeles: Sage. p. 867f.
  This study is limited by its scientific approach. Only       Barney, J. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive
  firms experiencing BMI during a crisis were spe-               advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
  cifically examined and all these firms have been             Beliaeva, T., Shirokova, G., Wales, W., and Gafforova,
  SMEs. The companies came from low tech indus-                  E. (2020) Benefiting from economic crisis? Strategic
  tries, which were more affected by the crisis. The             orientation effects, trade-offs, and configurations with
                                                                 resource availability on SME performance. International
  impact of the Covid-19 crisis on other firms was not
                                                                 Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16,
  addressed. However, it is to be expected that the cri-         165–194.
  sis will also lead to significant changes at other firms.    Berends, H., Smits, A., Reymen, I., and Podoynitsyna, K.
  Nevertheless, some firms profited during the crisis            (2016) Learning while (re)configuring: business model
  and we cannot draw any conclusion on these com-                innovation processes in established firms. Strategic
  panies. To overcome these issues the relationships             Organization, 14, 3, 181–219.
© 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.      R&D Management 52, 2, 2022     309
                                                                                                                                                14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Thomas Clauss, Matthias Breier, Sascha Kraus, Susanne Durst and Raj V. Mahto
Bock, A.J., Opsahl, T., George, G., and Gann, D.M. (2012)       Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2016) Qualitative
  The effects of culture and structure on strategic flexi-        Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five
  bility during business model innovation. Journal of             Approaches. Singapore: Sage Publications.
  Management Studies, 49, 279–305.                             Dahles, H. and Susilowati, T.P. (2015) Business resil-
Bowers, M.R., Hall, J.R., and Srinivasan, M.M. (2017)             ience in times of growth and crisis. Annals of Tourism
  Organizational culture and leadership style: the missing        Research, 51, 34–50.
  combination for selecting the right leader for effective      Doz, Y.L. and Kosonen, M. (2010) Embedding strategic
  crisis management. Business horizons, 60, 551–563.             agility: a leadership agenda for accelerating business
Breier, M., Kallmuenzer, A., Clauss, T., Gast, J., Kraus, S.,     model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43, 370–382.
  and Tiberius, V. (2021) The role of business model inno-      Eggers, F. (2020) Masters of disasters? Challenges and
  vation in the hospitality industry during the COVID-19         opportunities for SMEs in times of crisis. Journal of
  crisis. International Journal of Hospitality Management,        Business Research, 116, 199–208.
  92, 102723.                                                   Eggers, F. and Kraus, S. (2011) Growing young SMEs in
Brockner, J. and James, E.H. (2008) Toward an under-              hard economic times: the impact of entrepreneurial and
  standing of when executives see crisis as opportunity.          customer orientations –a qualitative study from silicon
  The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 94–115.         valley. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship,
Brumfield, K. (2012) Succeeding in crisis leadership.             24, 99–111.
  Financial Executive, 28, 45–48.                              Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) Building theories from case study
Casadesus-Masanell, R. (2010) Business model innovation          research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
  and competitive imitation business model innovation           Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007) Theory build-
  and competitive imitation. Business, 11, 46.                    ing from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy
Casadesus-Masanell, R. and Ricart, J.E. (2010) From strat-       of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.
  egy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range           Felin, T., Gambardella, A., Stern, S., and Zenger, T. (2019)
  Planning, 43, 195–215.                                         Lean startup and the business model: experimentation
Chen, S., Igan, D., Pierri, N., and Presbitero, A. (2020) The     revisited. Long Range Planning, 53, 101889.
  economic impact of Covid-19 in Europe and the US:            Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) Demonstrating
  outbreaks and individual behaviour matter a great deal,         rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of
  non- pharmaceutical interventions matter less. voweu.          inductive and deductive coding and theme development.
  org.                                                            International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80–92.
Chesbrough, H. (2020) To recover faster from Covid-19,         Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-
  open up: managerial implications from an open innova-           study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.
  tion perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 88,        Foss, N.J. and Saebi, T. (2017) Fifteen years of research
  410–413.                                                       on business model innovation: how far have we come,
Chesbrough, H. and Rosenbloom, R.S. (2002) The role of            and where should we go? Journal of Management, 43,
  the business model in capturing value from innovation:          200–227.
  evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-           Giannacourou, M., Kantaraki, M., and Christopoulou, V.
  off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11,             (2015) The perception of crisis by Greek SMEs and its
  529–555.                                                       impact on managerial practices. Procedia -Social and
Clark, C., Davila, A., Regis, M., and Kraus, S. (2020)            Behavioral Sciences, 175, 546–551.
  Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behav-           Gilstrap, C.A., Gilstrap, C.M., Holderby, K.N., and Valera,
  iors: an international investigation. Global Transitions,       K.M. (2016) Sensegiving, leadership, and nonprofit cri-
  2, 76. –82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.003        ses: how nonprofit leaders make and give sense to orga-
Clausen, T.H. and Rasmussen, E. (2013) Parallel business          nizational crisis. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of
  models and the innovativeness of research-based spin-         Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27, 2787–2806.
  off ventures. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38,         Graebner, M.E., Martin, J.A., and Roundy, P.T. (2012)
  836–849.                                                       Qualitative data: cooking without a recipe. Strategic
Clauss, T. (2017) Measuring business model innovation:            Organization, 10, 276–284.
  conceptualization, scale development and proof of per-        Guest, G., Bunce, A., and Johnson, L. (2006) How many
  formance. R&D Management, 47, 385–403.                         interviews are enough? An experiment with data satura-
Clauss, T., Abebe, M., Tangpong, C., and Hock, M.                 tion and variability. Field methods, 18, 59–82.
  (2021) Strategic agility, business model innovation,          Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L., Castillo, A., and Montiel, I. (2020)
  and firm performance: an empirical investigation.               Companies vs. coronavirus: a call for rapid responsible
  IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68, 3,             innovation. Academy of Management. https://one.aom.
  767–884.                                                       org/covid -1 9-i nsig h ts-f rom-busin e ss-s usta i nabi l ity-
Clauss, T., Bouncken, R.B., Laudien, S., and Kraus, S.            scholars/gutierrez-gutierrez-castillo-montiel
  (2020) Business model reconfiguration and innovation          Henderson, R.M. and Clark, K.B. (1990) Architectural
  in SMEs: a mixed-      methods analysis from the elec-         innovation: the reconfiguration of existing prod-
  tronics industry. International Journal of Innovation           uct technologies and the failure of established firms.
  Management, 24, 02, 2050015.                                    Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9–30.
310   R&D Management 52, 2, 2022        © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                                                                                                                                  14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
                                                                                  Temporary business model innovation
  Hock-Doepgen, M., Clauss, T., Kraus, S., and Cheng, C.F.       Pal, R., Andersson, R., and Torstensson, H. (2012)
    (2021) Knowledge management capabilities and orga-              Organisational resilience through crisis strategic plan-
    nizational risk-taking for business model innovation in        ning: a study of Swedish textile SMEs in financial cri-
    SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 130, 683–697.              ses of 2007–2011. International Journal of Decision
  Johnson, M.W., Christensen, C.M., and Kagermann, H.               Sciences, Risk and Management, 4, 314–341.
    (2008) Reinventing your business model. Harvard               Pearson, C.M. and Clair, J.A. (1998) Reframing crisis man-
    Business Review, 86, 57–68.                                    agement. Academy of Management Review, 23, 59–76.
  Kraus, S., Clauss, T., Breier, M., Gast, J., Zardini, A., and   Petzold, S., Barbat, V., Pons, F., and Zins, M. (2019)
    Tiberius, V. (2020a) The economics of COVID-           19:     Impact of responsive and proactive market orientation
    initial empirical evidence on how family firms in               on SME performance: the moderating role of economic
    five European countries cope with the corona crisis.            crisis perception. Canadian Journal of Administrative
    International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior &             Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Adminis-
    Research, 26, 1067–1092.                                       tration, 36, 459–472.
  Kraus, S., Filser, M., Puumalainen, K., Kailer, N., and         Piette, C. and Zachary, M.-D. (2015) Sensitivity to the cri-
    Thurner, S. (2020b) Business model innovation: a                sis of SME financing in Belgium. Economic Review, iii,
    systematic literature review. International Journal of          31–45.
    Innovation and Technology Management, 17, 2050043.            Pohle, G. and Chapman, M. (2006) IBM’s global CEO
  Kraus, S., Moog, P., Schlepphorst, S., and Raich, M.              report 2006: business model innovation matters. Strategy
    (2013) Crisis and turnaround management in SMEs:                & Leadership, 34, 34–40.
    a qualitative-empirical investigation of 30 companies.       Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990) The core compe-
    International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 5, 4,       tence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68,
    406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijev.2013.058169                 79–91.
  Kulins, C., Leonardy, H., and Weber, C. (2016) A config-        del Rio-Chanona, R.M., Mealy, P., Pichler, A., Lafond, F.,
    urational approach in business model design. Journal of         and Farmer, D. (2020) Supply and demand shocks in the
    Business Research, 69, 1437–1441.                              COVID-19 pandemic: an industry and occupation per-
  Le Nguyen, H. and Kock, S. (2011) Managing SMEs’                  spective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06759.
    survival from financial crisis in a transition economy: a     Ritter, T. and Pedersen, C.L. (2020) Analyzing the impact
    chaos theory approach. Journal of General Management,           of the coronavirus crisis on business models. Industrial
    37, 31–45.                                                     Marketing Management, 88, 214–224.
  Institute for Crisis Management. (2004) Annual ICM Crisis       Saebi, T., Lien, L., and Foss, N.J. (2017) What drives busi-
    Report: News Coverage of Business Crisis During 2003.           ness model adaptation? The impact of opportunities,
    Louisville, KY: Institute for Crisis Management.                threats and strategic orientation. Long Range Planning,
  Markides, C.C. (2013) Business model innovation: what             50, 567–581.
    can the ambidexterity literature teach us? The Academy        Santos, J., Spector, B., and Van der Heyden, L. (2009)
    of Management Perspectives, 27, 313–323.                       Toward a theory of business model innovation within
  Markides, C. and Charitou, C.D. (2004) Competing with             incumbent firms. INSEAD Working Paper.
    dual business models: a contingency approach. The             Saunders, M.N. (2012) Choosing research participants.
    Academy of Management Executive, 18, 22–36.                    In: Symon, G., and Cassell, C. (eds.), Qualitative
  Martins, L.L., Rindova, V.P., and Greenbaum, B.E. (2015)          Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current
    Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: a cogni-                Challenges. London: Sage. pp. 35–52.
    tive approach to business model innovation. Strategic         Schneider, S. and Spieth, P. (2014) Business model innova-
    Entrepreneurship Journal, 9, 99–117.                           tion and strategic flexibility: insights from an experimen-
  Massa, L., Tucci, C., and Afuah, A. (2017) A critical             tal research design. International Journal of Innovation
    assessment of business model research. Academy of               Management, 18, 1440009.
    Management Annals, 11, 73–104.                               Shepherd, D.A. (2003) Learning from business failure:
  Matzler, K., Bailom, F., Friedrich von den Eichen, S., and        propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed.
    Kohler, T. (2013) Business model innovation: coffee tri-        Academy of Management Review, 28, 318–328.
    umphs for Nespresso. Journal of Business Strategy, 34,        Simón- Moya, V., Revuelto-    Taboada, L., and Ribeiro-
    30–37.                                                         Soriano, D. (2016) Influence of economic crisis on new
  Mintzberg, H. (1978) Patterns in strategy formation.              SME survival: reality or fiction? Entrepreneurship &
    Management Science, 24, 934–948.                               Regional Development, 28, 157–176.
  Muhic, M. and Bengtsson, L. (2021) Dynamic capabil-             Smith, L. and Riley, D. (2012) School leadership in times
    ities triggered by cloud sourcing: a stage-based model         of crisis. School Leadership & Management, 32, 57–71.
    of business model innovation. Review of Managerial            Snihur, Y. and Tarzijan, J. (2018) Managing complexity
    Science, 15, 1, 33. –54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s1184      in a multi- business-model organization. Long Range
    6-019-00372-1                                               Planning, 51, 1, 50–63.
  Osiyevskyy, O. and Dewald, J. (2015) Explorative ver-           Snihur, Y., Thomas, L.D.W., and Burgelman, R.A.
    sus exploitative business model change. Strategic               (2018) An ecosystem-level process model of business
    Entrepreneurship Journal, 9, 58–         78. https://doi.      model disruption: the disruptor’s gambit. Journal of
    org/10.1002/sej.1192                                            Management Studies, 55, 1278–1316.
© 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.         R&D Management 52, 2, 2022      311
                                                                                                                             14679310, 2022, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/radm.12498 by Nat Prov Indonesia, Wiley Online Library on [05/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Thomas Clauss, Matthias Breier, Sascha Kraus, Susanne Durst and Raj V. Mahto
Sosna, M., Trevinyo-    Rodriguez, R.N., and Velamuri,          Marketing Management, IEEE Transactions on
  S.R. (2010) Business model innovation through trial-          Engineering Management, R&D Management, and
  and-error learning –the Naturhouse case. Long Range          Organization & Environment.
  Planning, 43, 383–407.
Ter Wengel, J. and Rodriguez, E. (2006) SME export per-          Matthias Breier is Ph.D. student at the Technical
  formance in Indonesia after the crisis. Small Business         University Lappeenranta, Finland. His research area
  Economics, 26, 25–37.                                         is business model innovation and crisis management.
Vargo, J. and Seville, E. (2011) Crisis strategic planning for   He did his undergraduate studies at the University of
  SMEs: finding the silver lining. International Journal of      Liechtenstein. Moreover, he is the owner of a consul-
  Production Research, 49, 5619–5635.                           tancy specialized on information system applications
Velu, C. and Jacob, A. (2016) Business model innovation          and coding for sustainable finance and lecturer at the
  and owner-managers: the moderating role of competi-           University of Applied Sciences Hamburg, Germany.
  tion. R & D Management, 46, 451–463.
Wenzel, M., Stanske, S., and Lieberman, M.B. (2020)              Sascha Kraus is Full Professor of Management at
  Strategic responses to crisis. Strategic Management            the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano in South Tyrol,
  Journal, 41, 7/18.                                             Italy. He holds a doctorate in Social and Economic
Williams, G.A., Woods, C.L., and Staricek, N.C. (2017)           Sciences from Klagenfurt University, Austria, a Ph.D.
  Restorative rhetoric and social media: an examination of       in Industrial Engineering and Management from
  the Boston Marathon bombing. Communication Studies,            Helsinki University of Technology and a Habilitation
  68, 385–402.
                                                                 (Venia Docendi) from Lappeenranta University
Winterhalter, S., Zeschky, M.B., and Gassmann, O. (2016)
  Managing dual business models in emerging markets:
                                                                 of Technology, both in Finland. Before, he held
  an ambidexterity perspective. R&D Management, 46, 3,           Full Professor positions at Utrecht University, The
  464–479.                                                      Netherlands, the University of Liechtenstein, École
Yin, R.K. (1981) The case study crisis: Some answers.            Supérieure du Commerce Extérieur Paris, France,
  Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 58–65.                  and at Durham University, United Kingdom.
Yin, R.K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and
                                                                 Susanne Durst is Full Professor of Management
  Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
                                                                 at Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia, and
Zook, C. and Allen, J. (2003) Growth outside the core.
  Harvard Business Review, 81, 66–73, 125.                      Full Professor of Business Administration at the
Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2008) The fit between product mar-        University of Skovde, Sweden. She holds a doctor-
  ket strategy and business model: implications for firm         ate in Economics from Paris-Sud University, France.
  performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1–26.          Her research interests include small business man-
                                                                 agement, knowledge (risk) management, responsible
                                                                 digitalization and sustainable business development.
Notes                                                            Raj V. Mahto is a Professor of Entrepreneurship
1
                                                                 and Chair of Finance, International & Innovation
Henderson and Clark (1990) defined architectural and
                                                                 Department in Anderson School of Management at
 modular innovation. This definition must not be con-
                                                                 the University of New Mexico. He holds a Creative
 fused with the BMI Typology of Foss and Saebi (2017),
 that also uses the terminology architectural and modu-          Enterprise Endowed Professorship. His research
 lar. Their terminology is built on fifteen years of BMI         is published in Journal of Applied Psychology,
 research and describes the scope of a BMI.                      Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Journal of
2
As a result of the Covid-19 lockdown, new capacities for        Business Research, Journal of Small Business
 strategic considerations and new operational implemen-          Management, IEEE Transactions on Engineering
 tations were freed up in the course of operational cut-         Management, Technological Forecasting & Social
 backs. We describe these as ‘free capacities.’                  Change, and others. He is an associate editor for Journal
                                                                 of Small Business Management, Journal of Small
Thomas Clauss is Full Professor and chair in                     Business Strategy, and Technological Forecasting
Corporate Entrepreneurship and Digitalization in                 & Social Change. He also serves on editorial boards
Family Business at Witten/Herdecke University,                   of Family Business Review and International
Germany. He received his Ph.D. from the University               Entrepreneurship & Management Journal.
of Hamburg, Germany. His research interests in-
clude digitalization, business model innovation and
collaborative innovation generation in the context of            Supporting Information
family business. His work has appeared in leading
international journals, such as Long Range Planning,             Additional supporting information may be found in the on-
Journal of Supply Chain Management, Industrial                   line version of this article at the publisher’s web site:
312 R&D Management 52, 2, 2022 © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.