Kauffman Stadium Assessment

JCSCA + Burns & McDonnell

This document contains information pertaining to
the condition of Kauffman Stadium as documented
by the Jackson County Sports Complex Authority
(JCSCA), including descriptions, conditions, and
exhibits which have been reviewed by Burns &
McDonnell and documented in this report.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 1
March 17, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PURPOSE AND SCOPE ......................................................................................................................................4

Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... 4
Scope .............................................................................................................................................................. 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................5

General Description ........................................................................................................................................ 5
General Condition ........................................................................................................................................... 5
Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................... 5
KC Royals Response Plan .............................................................................................................................. 5

EXISTING CONDITIONS .....................................................................................................................................6

Site Flatwork ................................................................................................................................................... 6
Landscaping and Appurtenances.................................................................................................................. 14
Structure........................................................................................................................................................ 15
Façades ........................................................................................................................................................ 21
Miscellaneous Exterior Obersravtions ........................................................................................................... 22
Interior Elements ........................................................................................................................................... 25
Electrical........................................................................................................................................................ 29

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................32

EXHIBIT A ..........................................................................................................................................................34

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 2
March 17, 2022
TABLE OF FIGURES

Figure C‐1.1: Star Cracking at Column Foundation • Outfield Plaza…………………………………………………………………… 6

Figure C‐1.2: Concrete Cracking • Unknown……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6
Figure C‐2: Water Ponding • Near Gate A ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7
Figure C‐3.1: Water Seepage • Janitor's Closet (J251)…………………………………………………………………………………….… 7
Figure C‐3.2: Water Ponding in Janitor's Closet • Janitor's Closet (J251)…………………………………………………………… 7
Figure C‐3.3: Room Name Plate • Janitor's Closet …………………………………………………………………………………………… 7
Figure C‐4.1: Concession Stand, Holding Water • Upper Concourse Concessions Stand…………………………………… 8
Figure C‐4.2: Concession Stand, Holding Water • Upper Concourse Concessions Stand…………………………………… 8
Figure C‐5: Water Ponding • Women's Restroom, Around Section 216……………………………………..……………………. 9
Figure C‐6: Concrete Discoloration Due to Eroded Metal • Outfield, Upper Concourse…………………………………... 9
Figure C‐7: Tripping Hazard, Uneven Pavement Intersection • Adjacent to Miller Lite Fountain Bar………………… 10
Figure C‐8: Eroded Step Edge • H&R Block Private Suite Stairs………………………………………………………………………… 11
Figure C‐9.1: ADA Elevator • Adjacent to Dugout…………….……….……………………………………………………………………… 12
Figure C‐9.2: ADA Elevator • Adjacent to Dugout…………….……….……………………………………………………………………… 12
Figure C‐10: ADA Seating Area Fence • Upper Concourse…………………………………………..…………………………………… 13
Figure C‐11: Cable Management Needed • Tunnel by Dugout…………………………………….………………………………… 14
Figure S‐1: Water Damage • Underground Tunnel Connecting Kauffman & Arrowhead…………………………………. 15
Figure S‐2: Exposed Reinforcement • Typical Outdoor Seating……………………………………………………………………….. 17
Figure S‐3.1: Support Frame Deterioration • Looking Out From H&R Block Private Suite………………………………… 17
Figure S‐3.2: Support Frame Deterioration • Middle Concourse……………………………………………………………………… 17
Figure S‐4: Rusted Metal in Support Frame • Middle Concourse……………………………………..……………………………… 18
Figure S‐5: Support Frame Deterioration • Looking Out From H&R Block Private Suite…..……………………………… 18
Figure S‐6: Support Column Caulk Deterioration • Gate D………………………………………….…..……………………………… 19
Figure S‐7: Wall with Horizontal Cracks • Upper Concourse Near Helix Ramp…………….…..……………………………… 19
Figure S‐8: Missing Handrail • Miller Lite Fountain Bar Deck.……………………………….……….…..…………………………… 20
Figure AME‐1: Surface Rust on Platform Support Brackets • Section 201 Looking Up………………………….…………. 22
Figure AME‐2: Damaged / Bent Guardrail • Section 417…………………………………………………………………..…………. 23
Figure AME‐3: Deteriorating Sealant • Janitor's Closet J251 ‐ Outfield Experience…………………………………………. 24
Figure AI‐1: Caution Strip • Back of House Food Storage………………………………………………………………………………… 25
Figure AI‐2: Transition Strip • Back of House Food Storage………………………………..…………………………………………… 25
Figure AI‐3: Water Damage • Diamond Club……………………………………………………….………………………………………….. 26
Figure AI‐4: Missing Light Fixtures • Diamond Club…………………………………………………………………………………………. 27
Figure AI‐5: Water Damage • Various Concession Stands………………………….……………………………………………………. 28
Figure AI‐6: Damage to Acoustic Ceiling Tile • Liquor Storage Closet ‐ Signature Suite Level………………………….. 28
Figure E‐1: Fire Alarm Strobe • Kauffman‐Arrowhead UG Tunnel…………………………………………………………………….. 29
Figure E‐2: Ceiling Mounted Fixture • Kauffman‐Arrowhead UG Tunnel …………………………………….……………………. 30
Figure E‐3: Speaker System • Near 03.50.02 Concessions………………………………………………………………………………… 31
Figure E‐4: Beneath Grandstands • Loge Level Suite…………………………………………………………………………………..…… 31

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 3
March 17, 2022
PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Purpose
The Kansas City Royals organization has a lease with the Jackson County Sports Complex
Authority (JCSCA) that requires the organization to maintain Kauffman Stadium to a level
consistent with a First-Class MLB Baseball Stadium. The purpose of this study is to report the
overall condition of Kauffman Stadium and the immediate environs to determine if the team is
upholding their lease agreement.

Scope
Burns & McDonnell, in conjunction with the JCSCA, has developed a Facility Assessment
Report that reviews and documents the stadium condition. During 2022, the Jackson County
Sports Complex Authority conducted an inspection of every space in Kauffman Stadium. Each
room was carefully examined and documented using iPad technology (Fuze Inspections mobile
application by Evoco Inc.) for the walkthrough. This application allowed the Jackson County
Sports Complex Authority to build a database containing photos, condition ratings, and an
inventory of building elements in each room. These elements included: a rating of overall
room, electrical components, mechanical components, and various pieces of equipment,
including, a listing of the type of floors, walls, and ceilings in each room. Checks of mechanical
and plumbing equipment, including, life safety systems, such as 24 hour monitored control
rooms and fire suppression systems were also completed. Burns & McDonnell reviewed the
database, interviewed Kansas City Royals staff and received maintenance records. This report
is based on the above review in conjunction with on-site evaluations by Burns & McDonnell
engineers and architects.

Burns & McDonnell’s scope is limited in nature and did not include an entire facility room-by-
room inspection or evaluation. An on-site walk through of the stadium and the immediate
environs was performed by Burns & McDonnell’s engineers and architects to spot-check rooms
and areas, comparing the overall conditions reported in the Jackson County Sports Complex
Authority’s condition reports to the actual conditions observed. Additionally, Burns &
McDonnell has provided recommendations for observed maintenance issues that may need to
be rectified in a timely manner.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 4
March 17, 2022
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

General Description
Kauffman Stadium is located at One Royal Way in Kansas City, Missouri. The renovation,
completed in 2010, was intended to enhance the fan’s game day experience, increase revenue
generation, and improve the day-to-day operations of the Kansas City Royals and other users
of the facility. The stadium holds approximately 38,000 fans and offers amenities such as an
outfield concourse, kids’ area, bars, restaurants, hall of fame/conference center, and various
other spaces geared towards large scale entertainment.

General Condition
In general, Kauffman Stadium and the immediate environs were observed to be in satisfactory
condition. It is apparent the Kansas City Royals have performed the ordinary cleaning and
maintenance obligations consistent with a First-Class MLB Baseball Stadium.

Minor physical deficiencies were observed throughout various locations within Kauffman
Stadium and the immediate environs. Such deficiencies are expected in such a large facility
and typical of a high-use facility. Most deficiencies can be easily addressed by the Kansas City
Royals through standard maintenance procedures.

Recommendations
The final section of this document, labeled “Summary of Recommendations” includes
recommendations for the deficiencies observed for each building or site category. Most
observed deficiencies are generally minor and may require attention in a timely manner.
Critical, more hazardous issues are less frequent, and the level of importance has been noted
in the document to reflect the need for a resolution.

KC Royals Response Plan

The Kansas City Royals have developed a response plan to rectify the deficiencies observed
by Burns & McDonnell this year. This plan includes the location of each deficiency, an action
to correct or maintain the item of concern, and a date for which each item is to be addressed.
This report can be found as ”Exhibit A” attached to the end of this document.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 5
March 17, 2022
EXISTING CONDITIONS

Site Flatwork
Kauffman Stadium is comprised of a significant amount of paved area within the concourse.
These paved areas serve mostly as access walkways for pedestrians to traverse the stadium
grounds, both inside and outside the security fencing. In addition to the walkways, stairs,
curbing, and retaining walls make up the site flatwork. Overall, the site flatwork at Kauffman
Stadium was observed to be in satisfactory condition, apart from a few mild site defects. Figure
C-1.1 and Figure C-1.2 shows an example of site pavement cracking.

Figure C-1.1: Star Cracking at Column Foundation Figure C-1.2: Concrete Cracking
Location: Outfield Plaza Location: Unknown

Standing water (in relative low points) was a common site defect observed. Figure C-2
displays an area of concrete adjacent to a grassed area that is not draining effectively.

Figure C-4.1, Figure C-4.2, and Figure C-5 portray other examples of walking surfaces that
are trapping water. A puddle in a doorway can be a slipping risk. Additionally, sitting water at
the base of a wall can infiltrate the material and over time, wear on the wall, especially as
freeze/thaw conditions arise. This concern is valid also in Figure C-3.1, Figure C-3.2, and
Figure C-3.3. Ponding inside of the Janitor’s Closet has led to a seepage from the interior of
the room to the exterior façade. This door was open at the time of the assessment.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 6
March 17, 2022
 Figure C-2: Water Ponding Figure C-3.1: Water Seepage
Location: Near Gate A Location: Janitor’s Closet (J251)

Figure C-3.2: Water Ponding in Janitor’s Closet Figure C-3.3 Room Name Plate
Location: Janitor’s Closet (J251) Location: Janitor’s Closet (J251)

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 7
March 17, 2022
 Figure C-4.1: Concession Stand, Holding Water
Location: Upper Concourse Concessions Stand

Figure C-4.2: Concession Stand, Holding Water Figure C-5: Water Ponding
Location: Upper Concourse Concessions Stand Location: Women’s Restroom, Around
Section 216

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 8
March 17, 2022
Other items of aesthetic concerns are shown in Figure C-6, as rusted metal discoloration has
traveled down the face of the concrete wall.

Figure C-6: Concrete Discoloration Due

to Eroded Metal
Location: Outfield, Upper Concourse

Other site appurtenances on site were evaluated, this included fencing, decorative walls, hand
railings, light poles, and drainage structures. Minor site defects were observed, most of which
was deemed to be in acceptable condition.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 9
March 17, 2022
A minor item that was raised as a concern during the assessment walk was the existence of
tripping hazards. Figure C-7 shows a particular intersection of concrete that could be a tripping
hazard. Additionally, Figure C-8 shows an eroded step edge in the H&R Block Private Suite
which could also pose a tripping hazard.

Figure C-7: Tripping Hazard, Uneven Pavement Intersection

Location: Adjacent to Miller Lite Fountain Bar

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 10
March 17, 2022
 Figure C-8: Eroded Step Edge
Location: H&R Block Private Suite Stairs

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 11
March 17, 2022
Site features that allow access to areas of the stadium were in mostly acceptable condition. A few site
defects include the rust on the elevator from the underground to the ground level/ field level, as shown
in Figure C-9.1 and Figure C-9.2.

Figure C-9.1: ADA Elevator

Location: Adjacent to Dugout

Figure C-9.2: ADA Elevator

Location: Adjacent to Dugout

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 12
March 17, 2022
In the upper concourse, on the first base-side, there was an ADA watching platform that was
surrounded by metal gates. These gates and the protruding column provide a tight window for
a wheelchair, as seen in Figure C-10. This access point to the ADA watching platform should
be reviewed for wheelchair accessibility.

Figure C-10: ADA Seating Area Fence

Location: Upper Concourse

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 13
March 17, 2022
 In the underground passageway near the dugout, some cable management is needed. No
items should be hanging off the cable tray, as shown in Figure C-11.

Figure C-11: Cable Management Needed

Location: Tunnel by Dugout

Landscaping and Appurtenances

Various species of native planting and grass can be found between walkways and within
planting beds surrounding the stadium. Landscaping around the stadium improves aesthetic
appeal of the facility and provides visual breaks within the otherwise largely paved surface.
Overall, the landscaping features were observed to be in acceptable condition. General
landscaping maintenance operations should be continued.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 14
March 17, 2022
Structure
The substructure is primarily concrete drilled piles with pile caps. Cast-in-place (CIP) grade
beams are located around the perimeter and throughout the foundation system. CIP mat
foundations support the stair and elevator core walls and CIP single spread footings also exist
for lighter loaded structures. Floating slabs-on-grade exist throughout the facility.

No significant settlement of the structure was observed. The slab-on-grade is primarily in

satisfactory condition. No major cracks or spalling of the concrete slab-on-grade was observed.
There was some water damage observed in the underground tunnel which connects Kauffman
to Arrowhead Stadium, as show in Figure S-1.

Figure S-1: Water Damage

Location: Underground tunnel connecting Kauffman & Arrowhead

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 15
March 17, 2022
The original superstructure is primarily cast-in-place (CIP) reinforced concrete columns and
walls for the vertical support system with reinforced concrete pan joist slab system. During
major renovation stages, additions were constructed which consisted primarily of CIP
reinforced concrete walls and steel wide flange columns. Other vertical support systems
include Hollow Structural Section (HSS) columns and concrete masonry (CMU) load bearing
shear walls.

The Plaza level consists of a suspended reinforced concrete slab/beam system. Other framing
systems include a light-weight slab-on-foam fill bearing on suspended concrete slab and
composite deck supported by steel wide flange beams. The Broadcast, Writing Press and
Loge level primarily consists of light weight concrete composite deck supported by steel wide
flange beams. Main Roof and Outfield Roof levels primarily consist of steel wide flange and
Hollow Structural Section (HSS) beams supporting standing seam metal roof deck. This level
also consists of metal roof deck supported by steel wide flange beams. The scoreboard
consists of a mixture of steel wide flange beams, Hollow Structural Sections (HSS) tubes and
steel angles. The floor system is steel grating.

While some cracking and spalling was observed, the original reinforced concrete columns and
walls are in satisfactory condition. However, there were multiple cases where the steel
reinforcing was exposed, as show in Figure S-2, Figure S-3.1, and Figure S-3.2. In Figure S-
2 the vertical column and wall surfaces are flat and smooth. Concrete patchwork of the original
structure was observed to be flat and smooth and is in satisfactory condition as well. The
expansion joints at the original superstructure to the renovation superstructure are in
satisfactory condition. No deterioration was observed. Conversely, further review of structures
in Figure S-3.1 and Figure S-3.2 is needed.

The original reinforced concrete pan joist slab systems are currently in satisfactory condition.
No major cracks or widespread spalling was observed.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 16
March 17, 2022
 Figure S-2: Exposed Reinforcement
Location: Typical Outdoor Seating

Figure S-3.1: Support Frame Deterioration Figure S-3.2: Support Frame Deterioration
Location: Looking Out From H&R Block Private Suite Location: Middle Concourse

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 17
March 17, 2022
 Figure S-4: Rusted Metal in Support Frame
Location: Middle Concourse
Figure S-5 shows a horizontal crack along a support beam, above where it appears two towels
are placed into holes in the concrete. Further south, an equipment box is hanging from its
supports on the horizontal beam.

Figure S-5: Support Frame Deterioration

Location: Looking Out From H&R Block Private Suite

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 18
March 17, 2022
More exterior structural members showed different signs of weathering. Helix Ramp columns at
Gate D were missing caulk, as shown in Figure S-6. Horizontal cracking was seen on the
upper concourse wall near a helix ramp, as shown in Figure S-7.

Figure S-6: Support Column Caulk Deterioration

Location: Gate D

Figure S-7: Wall with Horizontal Cracks

Location: Upper Concourse Near Helix Ramp

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 19
March 17, 2022
The reinforced concrete walls of the renovation stage are in satisfactory condition. No major
cracks or spalling was observed, and the vertical wall surface is flat and smooth. The steel
beams and connections of the renovation stage are generally in satisfactory condition. No
corrosion or deflection was observed.

Handrails and handrail anchorage was inspected in various locations throughout the stadium. It
was observed that handrails were completely missing from the stairs shown in Figure S-8. It is
unknown if they were missing or just in the process of being replaced prior to the start of the
season.

Figure S-8: Missing Handrail

Location: Miller Lite Fountain Bar Deck

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 20
March 17, 2022
Façades
Kauffman stadium incorporates a variety of finish materials that are used in the composition of
the exterior façade. The primary surface materials include structural concrete, insulated metal
panel, curtainwall, and patterned perforated metal panels on galvanized steel structure.

Stone veneer and glass storefront systems are utilized extensively along the base of the
stadium, in addition to miscellaneous structures such as a metal entry canopy, gates, and
fencing.
All facades, in general, appear to be in satisfactory condition. Glass storefronts and curtainwall
systems appear to be in satisfactory condition. Aluminum frame and mullions were observed
to be free of staining, fading, or degradation of any kind. Seals and flashing around storefront
appear to be in satisfactory condition.
Masonry cladding systems appear to be in satisfactory condition. No chipping or staining of the
stone or grout was observed.
Glass storefront systems appear to be in satisfactory conditions. Aluminum frame and mullions
were observed to be free of staining, fading, or degradation of any kind. Seals and flashing
around storefront appear to be in satisfactory condition.
Additionally, internal storefront systems appear to be in satisfactory conditions. Aluminum
frame and mullions were observed to be free of staining, fading, or degradation of any kind.
Seals and flashing around storefront appear to be in satisfactory condition.
Insulated metal panels systems were observed to be in satisfactory condition. In general, no oil
canning, staining, or degradation of any kind was observed.

Perforated metal panels and graphic mesh systems appear to be in satisfactory condition. No
oil canning, staining, or degradation of any kind was observed, and galvanized sub-structure
appears to be free of corrosion or rust.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 21
March 17, 2022
Miscellaneous Exterior Observations

The steel support bracket, which supports large speakers, appears to be rusting, as show in
Figure AME-1.

Figure AME-1: Surface Rust on Platform Support Brackets

Location: Section 201 Looking Up

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 22
March 17, 2022
At the guardrail outside section 417 appears to be damaged / bent, as shown in Figure AME-2.
This damage could prove to be hazardous to fans who may put too much pressure on the
guardrail. It is recommended that this be addressed quickly.

Figure AME-2: Damaged / Bent Guardrail

Location: Section 417

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 23
March 17, 2022
In most locations joint sealant and caulking appears to be in satisfactory condition. However, at
various locations throughout the stadium, sealant was observed to be cracked or separating,
as shown in Figure AME-3, at Janitor closet J251

Figure AME-3: Deteriorating Sealant

Location: Janitor’s Closet J251 – Outfield Experience

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 24
March 17, 2022
Interior Elements
Interior finishes within Kauffman stadium encompass a broad range of materials for floors,
walls, and ceilings. The primary flooring systems are composed of epoxy and sealed concrete.
These surfaces were observed to be in satisfactory condition, typically. Minor cracking was
observed at various locations throughout the facility, which is considered normal given the
expansion and contraction properties of the materials. No excessive cracking was observed
during the walk-through.

Carpet flooring was generally observed to be in satisfactory condition. No signs of rips, tears,
or discoloration were observed aside from what is considered normal wear and tear.

Porcelain/Ceramic tile flooring areas appear to be in satisfactory condition. No signs of grout

discoloration or cracking were observed.

It was observed that the non-slip texture & warning strips are beginning to wear away from
typical use in various locations, as shown in Figure AI-1 and Figure AI-2. This could become a
slip and fall hazard to patrons, especially during the earlier and later portions of the MLB
season.

Figure AI-1: Caution Strip Figure AI-2: Transition Strip

Location: Back of House Food Storage Location: Back of House Food Storage

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 25
March 17, 2022
Wall materials at Kauffman stadium typically include painted or exposed Concrete Masonry
Units (CMU) or painted gypsum board on metal stud framing. Alternative wall materials include
porcelain or ceramic tile, glass tile, wood veneer, and glass storefront systems.

In general, interior wall surfaces were observed to be in satisfactory condition. Painted gypsum
board walls appear to be in satisfactory condition. In general, no punctures, holes, or scratches
were observed.

Ceramic tile walls generally appear to be in satisfactory condition. No visible chipping, flaking,
or cracking of the tile or grout was observed.

Wood paneling, typically, is in satisfactory condition. No signs of scratching, fading, or

deterioration of any kind were observed.

Figure AI-3: Water Damage

Location: Diamond Club

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 26
March 17, 2022
Ceilings in Kauffman stadium are generally concrete which has been left exposed or painted.
Refer to the “Structure” section for observations of concrete surfaces. Other ceiling types
located within the interior spaces of the stadium include gypsum board, acoustical ceiling tile,
and wood paneling in some cases.
Gypsum board ceilings appear to be in satisfactory condition, typically. There were 3 missing
light fixtures in the Diamond Club, as show in Figure AI-4. There was water damage observed
at the ceiling access panel in the Diamond club, as shown in Figure AI-3.

Figure AI-4: Missing Light Fixtures

Location: Diamond Club

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 27
March 17, 2022
The General conditions of the concession stands were acceptable, however there were several
locations where the ACT was falling or in need of repair, as shown in Figure AI-5. The ACT panels
and structure was observed to be falling in the Liquor storage closet as show in Figure AI-6.

Figure AI-5: Water Damage

Location: Various Concession Stands

Figure AI-6: Damage to Acoustic Ceiling Tile

Location: Liquor Storage Closet – Signature Suite Level

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 28
March 17, 2022
Electrical
The electrical service at Kauffman stadium consists of (7) 3,000A, (2) 1600A and (2) 4000A,
480Y/277V 3 phase, 4 wire main switchgears along with transformers ranging in size from 45
KVA to 225 KVA. The switchgear is spread throughout the service and plaza levels of the
stadium. Emergency power is provided to the stadium through a 1600A switchgear at
480Y/277V, 3-phase, 4-wire and is connected to a 1000KW on-site generator. Lighting and
appliance panelboards are in each electrical room on every stadium level.

Telecommunications are fed from an underground vault and routed to the main
telecommunications equipment room on the service level. The backbone cabling is routed via
cable tray to each of the telecommunication rooms on each level.

The overall electrical system present installation was observed to be in satisfactory condition.
However, the following conditions have been observed:

In the underground tunnel connecting Kauffman and Arrowhead it was observed that a fire
alarm strobe near the exit on the Kauffman side, as shown in Figure E-1, has been hit by a
vehicle in the tunnel. This device needs to be replaced with a new UL listed strobe device.

Figure E-1: Fire Alarm Strobe

Location: Kauffman-Arrowhead UG Tunnel

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 29
March 17, 2022
On the plaza level near the diamond club, it was observed that the housing on some lighting has come loose.
One example shown in Figure E-2.

Figure E-2: Ceiling Mounted Fixture

Location: Kauffman-Arrowhead UG Tunnel

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 30
March 17, 2022
There are weatherproof devices that have lost their integrity in various locations throughout the
ballpark. In one example, as shown in Figure E-3, the speaker supports were rusting and
device supporting the speakers had come apart exposing the internals to the elements.
Another view shown in Figure E-4 is on the Loge level looking up that the grandstands above.
The area beneath the grandstands had various devices that needed maintenance.

Figure E-3: Speaker System

Location: Near 03.50.02 Concessions

Figure E-4: Beneath Grandstands

Location: Loge Level Suite

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 31
March 17, 2022
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

Site Flatwork

The majority of flatwork at Kauffman was observed to be in acceptable condition. Regular site
maintenance to the should be continued throughout the year to sustain the quality of the concourse.
Some of the following specific observations should be addressed:
 Pavement cracking throughout the stadium concourse should be monitored closely or repaired.
Cracks exceeding ¼” in width should be replaced or sealed to avoid pavement damage during
freeze-thaw conditions. Significant displaced of pavement can create a tripping hazard for
pedestrians and are aesthetically unpleasant. Refer to Figure C-1.1, Figure C-1.2, C-7, and
Figure C-8 for examples.
 Broken or damaged site appurtenances and rust discoloration. An example shown in Figure
C-6 don’t pose as a hazard for stadium visitors but will improve the stadium’s overall aesthetic
quality.
 Keep open areas near dugouts clear and tidy. See Figure C-11 for an example of an area that
could be tidied.
The following comments pertain to elements that may pose potential safety concerns and should be
addressed as soon as possible.

o Any major pavement faulting (1” or greater) observed or warned of in this report will
need to be addressed. Displaced pavement from freeze-thaw conditions can be a
tripping hazard and is a threat to pedestrian safety.

Landscaping and Appurtenances

The landscaping and appurtenances within the stadium concourse were found to be mostly in
acceptable condition. Routine maintenance should be performed to sustain the concourse
landscaping, so it is to remain in acceptable condition.

Structure

The majority of all substructure elements were observed to be in satisfactory condition.

Continue routine maintenance as required.

The majority of all superstructure elements were observed to be in satisfactory condition.

 Concrete cracking and spalling should be routinely monitored and patched to ensure
rebar corrosion does not worsen.
 Continued, routine monitoring of these areas is recommended. Concrete patchwork is
recommended within the next 1 to 2 years.
 Locations where handrails were missing, it is recommended to replace immediately.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 32
March 17, 2022
Miscellaneous Exterior Observations

 It is recommended that the damaged guardrail outside Section 417 be repaired

immediately to ensure safety for all patrons.
 It is recommended that the rusting bracket holding a large speaker be replaced
immediately.
 Consider reapplying all warning strips where deterioration is observed. All transition
strips need to be repaired to comply with ADA code.

Interior Elements

Interior floor, wall, and ceiling finishes were observed to be in satisfactory condition, generally.
Acoustical ceiling tiles appear to be in satisfactory condition.

 Consider replacing ceiling tiles and/or grids which have water damage or are falling to
maintain a clean appearance and prevent further deterioration which may result in
pieces of material falling from the ceiling.

Electrical

In the underground tunnel connecting Kauffman and Arrowhead it was observed that a fire
alarm strobe near the exit on the Kauffman side, as shown in Figure E-1, has been hit by a
vehicle in the tunnel. This device needs to be replaced with a new UL listed strobe device.

 It is recommended that this device is replaced with a new UL listed strobe to ensure
proper fire alarm coverage is compliant with NFPA 72.
On the plaza level near the diamond club, it was observed that the housing on some lighting
has come loose. One example shown in Figure E-2.

 It is recommended that the housing is repaired so the light is properly protected from the
elements, and pedestrians below do not get injured by falling fixtures.
There are weatherproof devices that have lost their integrity in various locations throughout the
ballpark. In one example, as shown in Figure E-3, the speaker supports were rusting and
device supporting the speakers had come apart exposing the internals to the elements.
Another view shown in Figure E-4 is on the Loge level looking up that the grandstands above.
The area beneath the grandstands had various devices that needed maintenance.

 It is recommended that weatherproof devices and bracing are properly maintained to

protect the device as well as pedestrians below to ensure injuries don’t occur.

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 33
March 17, 2022
EXHIBIT A

architecture + engineering
Stadium Assessment /Page 34
March 17, 2022