Scribd
Upload
50 views5 pages

Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness: Date: Name: Product: Process

This document summarizes the results of an attribute gage R&R study with the following key points: 1) Three operators performed a study scoring 30 samples across two trials for 14 different attributes. 2) The appraiser agreement scores ranged from 57.14% to 100%, indicating some attributes need further training. 3) The attribute agreement scores against the known population ranged from 42.86% to 78.57%, showing room for improvement in accuracy. 4) Notes provide guidance on interpreting the different agreement scores and how the attribute legend defines the studied attributes.

Uploaded by

murali4095
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
50 views5 pages

Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness: Date: Name: Product: Process

This document summarizes the results of an attribute gage R&R study with the following key points: 1) Three operators performed a study scoring 30 samples across two trials for 14 different attributes. 2) The appraiser agreement scores ranged from 57.14% to 100%, indicating some attributes need further training. 3) The attribute agreement scores against the known population ranged from 42.86% to 78.57%, showing room for improvement in accuracy. 4) Notes provide guidance on interpreting the different agreement scores and how the attribute legend defines the studied attributes.

Uploaded by

murali4095
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Data Entry

Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness


SCORING REPORT
Attribute Legend 1 1 2 0

DATE: NAME: PRODUCT: PROCESS:


Operator #1 Try #1 Try #2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

11/1/1998 Your Name Your Project F&SP

Known Population Sample # Attribute 1 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 0 10 0 11 1 12 1 13 0 14 0 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Operator #2 Try #1 Try #2 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0

Operator #3 Try #1 Try #2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

Y/N Agree N N N Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N

Y/N Agree N N N Y N Y N Y N N Y Y Y N

% APPRAISER SCORE(1) -> % SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE(2) ->

100.00% 78.57%

78.57% 64.29%

100.00% 71.43%

SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) -> 57.14% SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE (4) -> Note:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

42.86%

If % Appraiser Score is less than 100% training needs to occur, focus on specific areas % Score vs. Attribute is an error against known population as deemed by experts 100% is the target for Screen % Effectiveness Score Sceen % Effective vs. Attribute is an error against a known population as deemed by the experts Attribute legend can be what defect codes are needing a score

Page 1

Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness


SCORING REPORT
Attribute Legend 1 1 2 0

DATE: NAME: PRODUCT: PROCESS:

11/1/1998 Your Name Your Project F&SP

Known Population Operator #1 Sample # Attribute Try #1 Try #2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 1 1 1 7 1 0 0 8 1 1 1 9 0 1 1 10 0 1 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 13 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Try #1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1

Operator #2 Try #2 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0

30

% APPRAISER SCORE(1) -> 100.00% (2) % SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE 78.57% ->

78.57% 64.29%

SCREEN % EFFECT SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SC Note:


(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

If % Appraiser Score is less than 100% training needs to occur, focus on spe % Score vs. Attribute is an error against known population as deemed by exp 100% is the target for Screen % Effectiveness Score Sceen % Effective vs. Attribute is an error against a known population as dee Attribute legend can be what defect codes are needing a score

our Name our Project

Operator #2

Operator #3 Try #1 Try #2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

Y/N Agree N N N Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N

Y/N Agree N N N Y N Y N Y N N Y Y Y N

100.00% 71.43%

SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) -> 57.14% N % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE (4) ->

42.86%

s to occur, focus on specific areas lation as deemed by experts

known population as deemed by the experts ng a score

You might also like