Scribd
Upload
10 views5 pages

Attribute MSA

The document outlines an Attribute Agreement Analysis for gage and part evaluations, detailing inspection results and appraiser agreement levels. It includes statistical reports on appraiser performance against standards, with metrics such as total inspected, matched, and calculated scores. The goal is to achieve 100% efficiency in operator agreement and compliance with standards.

Uploaded by

incomingsdi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views5 pages

Attribute MSA

The document outlines an Attribute Agreement Analysis for gage and part evaluations, detailing inspection results and appraiser agreement levels. It includes statistical reports on appraiser performance against standards, with metrics such as total inspected, matched, and calculated scores. The goal is to achieve 100% efficiency in operator agreement and compliance with standards.

Uploaded by

incomingsdi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Logo ATTRIBUTE AGREEMENT ANALYSIS

GAGE NUMBER PART NUMBER

GAGE NAME PART NAME

CHARACTERISTIC CONTROL PLAN

STATUS OF INSPECTION OR

All Operators agree


All operators agree
witin and between
PERFORMED BY DATE

with standard
each other
COMMENTS

Appraisers
Y/N Y/N

Sample No. Standard Try 1 Try 2 Try 1 Try 2 Try 1 Try 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35

1
Appraisers
Y/N Y/N

Sample No. Standard Try 1 Try 2 Try 1 Try 2 Try 1 Try 2

36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84

2
Appraisers
Y/N Y/N

Sample No. Standard Try 1 Try 2 Try 1 Try 2 Try 1 Try 2

85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100

3
ATTRIBUTE AGREEMENT ANALYSIS

STATISTICAL REPORT

% Appraiser to Self (No.1) % Appraiser vs Standard (No. 2)

Source 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Inspected 0 0 0 0 0 0
Matched 0 0 0 0 0 0
95% UCL #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Calculated Score #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
95% LCL #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
False Negative (operator biased toward rejection) 0 0 0
False Positive (operator biased toward acceptance) 0 0 0
Mixed (Operator accepts and rejects the same part) 0 0 0

System % Effective Score (No. 3)


System % Effective Score vs Standard (No.4)
Total Inspected 0 0
Matched 0 0
95% UCL #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Calculated Score #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
95% LCL #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

GRAPH REPORT
% Appraiser to Self % Appraiser vs Standard

95% LCL 95% LCL

100% 100%

90% 90%

80% 80%

70% 70%
Efficiency

60% 60%

50% 50%

40% 40%

30% 30%

20% 20%

10% 10%

0% 0%
0 0 0 0 0 0

Notes
1) Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials. An appraiser's score less than 100% is marginally acceptable - appraiser may
need training.
2) Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
3) All operators agreed within and between themselves.
4) All operators agreed within & between themselves AND agreed with the known standard. Target should be 100% efficiency.

4
For information on the theory in the form see MSA Reference Manual, Third edition.

You might also like