Scribd
Upload
15 views1 page

Ielts Writing Guide 1

The chart shows the percentage of British people who donated to charities in 1990 and 2010 by age group. In 1990, donation rates were highest among those aged 36-50 at around 42%, gradually increasing from younger age groups, but declining after 50. In 2010, donation rates were highest among those aged 51-65 at around 40%, and lowest among 18-25 year olds at around 7%. The passage discusses the pros and cons of staying with one company for one's entire career versus changing companies. Staying provides stability, respect, deep knowledge of one company's culture, but can become boring. Changing provides better opportunities, salaries, ability to prioritize one's own interests over a company's, but offers

Uploaded by

dorukready
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
15 views1 page

Ielts Writing Guide 1

The chart shows the percentage of British people who donated to charities in 1990 and 2010 by age group. In 1990, donation rates were highest among those aged 36-50 at around 42%, gradually increasing from younger age groups, but declining after 50. In 2010, donation rates were highest among those aged 51-65 at around 40%, and lowest among 18-25 year olds at around 7%. The passage discusses the pros and cons of staying with one company for one's entire career versus changing companies. Staying provides stability, respect, deep knowledge of one company's culture, but can become boring. Changing provides better opportunities, salaries, ability to prioritize one's own interests over a company's, but offers

Uploaded by

dorukready
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

TASK-1

The chart indicates the rate of British people from different ages who donates money to the charities
in the years 1990 and 2010.

Overall, the percentages of British people that gives money to the charity are at the lowest point at
the age between 18 and 25. For the group of 36-50 age, donating to the charity is at the highest point
when compared with other ages in 1990. However, in 2010, mostly 51-65 aged people donates to the
charity.

In 1990, there is a gradual increase between the age groups, 18-25, 26-35 and 36-50. At 36-50, the
peak reaches around %42. However, after that point there is a decrease in the rates of giving money
to the charity and falls about %32.

After 20 years, the rate of 18-25 years British people is %7, which is ten times lower than peoples at
the same age in 1990. The percentage of donating to the charity highly increase and reaches almost
%40, and after the age 51-65 there is a decrease until %35.

(172 words)

TASK-2

It is often argued that whether working at the same company for the whole business life or changing
the company while developing a career is more adventurous. It is obvious that both have advantages
and disadvantages for people, but I would prefer to work for different companies at my working life.

Firstly, people that work at the same organisation for whole life would obviously gain respect from
both their co-workers and managers. This would increase the trust of the company against them.
While working at the same place for long time people would learn the system and the culture of the
company. These deep knowledge about the company would increase the responsibilities of them. On
the other hand, working at the same place for whole life would be boring for most of the people.

Secondly, changing work constantly would provide people better opportunities. Since they are not
committed, they are more likely to consider other perspectives. They can choose the ideal company,
so that this situation provides better positions and salaries. Since they do not feel commitment to a
company, they are more likely to think professional and mostly care about their personal benefits
instead of the goodness of the company. However, constantly changing organisation would provide
less friendship at the workplace. On the contrary, these friendships would not be deep and long term.
These kinds of people generally try not to have emotional connections with the people in the
workplace. Although, having less friends in the workplace is a choice, it is still a negative of changing
organisation for the whole working life.

To conclude, working at the same company for whole business life would provide people a known
habits in the workplace while having a reputation in the organisation, on the negative side it may be
boring for the long term. Changing the organisation provides people to think freely, self-cared and
professionally. In this type of career growth maybe people would earn more money and better
positions, however they could not feel like home and build new friendships. I would prefer the
second one, to build a career that I can change my company and evaluate the opportunities according
to my own benefits.

(365 words)

You might also like