NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways) | Executive Summary | PACKAGE-2 | | | Construction/upgradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar to Pugal (Design Chainage 101.000 to Design Chainage 263.460) Section (length 162.460 km) under Phase-I of Bharatmala Pariyojana in the State of Rajasthan (Package-2). jena — Submitted by: ‘STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi In association with w ‘Sugam Technocrats Pvt. Ltd.,New Delhi | SS | : ae a run ii ‘association wih ‘Technocrats Pvt. Ld.‘Constuctontupgraation of two Ianes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar 10 pal (Design Chainage 101,000 to Design Chainage 263.460) Section (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phase of Bharatmala Pariyojana i the Sat of Rajasthan (Package-2). Table of Content CHAPTER - 0 Package -2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY No. Page No. 0.1 General... osssesssssssssssessseee On 02 Objective — = 4 03 Ma Nts ns ceaccssnernvtsinincescevesaesinicstatanscestetnictntsei 0-1 04 ‘Traffic Survey. 0-3 05 Improvement Proposals. 07 0.6 Pavement Design...... aseens . 0-12 07 Social Assessments. 0-15 08 Environmental Screening and Preliminary Assessment... 0-17 09 Estimated Cost Of The Project......c.essssssssssssesssssssseseeeeseseneseveee 0-18 0.10 Financial Analysis. cece eer Pere 0-19 O11 Recommendations. 0-19 ie 1 a pqens. Pt A secon a womens) Seam am vi wit Technocrats Pvt. Ltd, aCConstreccon/upgraation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Ruisinghnagar to Pugal (Design Chanage 101.000 1o Design Chanage 263.60) Section (engin 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report ‘under Phase of BharatmalaPariyoana inthe tate of Rajashan (Package-2). on 02 03 03.2 CHAPTER -0 PACKAGE-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY General ‘The National Highways Authority of India (NHAD has been assigned the work of Project Management Consultancy for the selected stretches /corridors of various roads in the States of Bihar, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Peduchery and Orrissa to Two laning / Four lane with paved shoulder NH configuration under BHARAT MALA Project. Tenders were invited by NHAI from Technical consultants for carrying out feasibility study/detailed project report and tender consultancy services for proper structuring and implementation of projects on EPC/PPP mode until declaration of Appointed date of projects. Mis Stup Consultants in Association with Sugam Technocrats Private Limited have been selected as preferred bidder for Package 6, “Ganga Nagar(NH-62)- Raisinghnagar-Rojhri- ‘Awa-Poogal and Anupgarh-Suratgarh” section of roads in the State of Rajasthan. The LOL was issued vide NHAI letter No. NHAV/BM/Proc./0/DPR/2015/7662 dated 08.01.2016. ‘The Consultants have commenced their services w.e.f 29.01.2016. Contract agreement for the work has been signed with NHAI on 29.02.2016... Objective ‘The main objective of the consultancy service is to establish the technical, economical, and financial viability of the project and prepare detailed project reports for rehabilitation/upgrading/construction of the existing/missing road to 2/4 lane NH configuration. The viability of the project shall be established taking into account the requirements with regard to rehabilitation, upgrading and improvement based on highway design, pavement design, provision of service roads wherever necessary, type of imtersections, rehabilitation and widening of existing and/or construction of new bridges and structures, road safety features, quantities of various items of works and cost estimates and economic analysis. Project Highway Project Route as per Contract agreement ‘As per contract agreement the route of the Project Highway was “Ganga Nagar (NH-62)- Raisinghnagar-Rojhri-Awa-Poogal and Anupgarh-Suratgarh” in the State of Rajasthan. ‘The length of Project Highway was 275 km. Final Project Route Based on Route Option Study conducted by the consultant, Consultations held with various, stakeholders and the Members of Parliament representing the areas through which the road e P Congukants PLA in nce with & Tecancras PM Li SSTUP Constants Pot. 14d. ey a & Im association wih ‘Sugam Technocrats Pvt. Lid,Consruction/spradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnapar to Pugal (Design Chainage 101.000 to Design Chainage 263460) Section (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phase I of Bharatmala Pariojana inthe State of Rajasthan (Package-2) passes on most suitable route suggested by the Consultant and interaction with NHAL authorities, final route for the project highway has been approved by NHAI vide letter No. 16031/1/2016/DPR-B/M_ (Package-06)/2218 dated 02.02.2017 for DPR. work under Package-6 is as under : “Sriganganagar (NH-62 at Sadhuwali)-2-Minor-Karanpur-Gajsinghpur-Raisinghnagar -Anupgarh-Gharsana-Rojhri-Sattasar-Poogalincluding the portion between NH62 (Junction with Suratgarh Road) and Z-minor so as to form ring road to Ganganagar town utilizing existing NH and eastern bypass. Map showing project highway is at Fig. 0.1. 0.3.2.2 Implementation of development proposals of the Project highway has been proposed in 034 035 03.6 ‘two work packages. For this purpose, road section from end of Raisinghnagar bypass km 101,000 to junction of proposed Pugal bypass with Dantour road_km 263.460 has been included in Package-2. Total length of the project highway in Package-2 is 162.460 km, Existing Alignment ‘The horizontal alignment is passing through plain / rolling terrain in the entire length. The horizontal geometrics of the alignment can cater to the design speed of 100 Km per hour in general. However, at a number of locations and in the built up areas it is quite substandard and not fit to cater for a design speed of even 80 km per hour. Horizontal geometrics needs to be improved to required standard. Vertical geometrics generally conforms to the required standard in the first half of the section that is up to km 180.00. Thereafter, vertical geometrics is quite substandard and needs to be improved to required standard. Existing Carriageway and Pavement ‘The existing project road has a mix of two lane carriageway of 7.0 m without paved shoulder and 5.5 m wide intermediate lane carriageway. The length of two lane ‘carriageway of 7.0 m width of the project highway is about 108 km and intermediate lane carriageway having 5.5 m and less width 52. km length. The condition of the pavement is ‘generally fai. The-riding quality in general varies from fair to good condition Existing Row Km-wise details of existing ROW have been obtained from the Revenue Maps/State PWD. Existing ROW along the project road in general is 25 m. SP comer conan) Set 02 pce ot ae yesh = or ste gamaCoasrucionlupgradaion of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Rasinghnagar to gal (Design Chainage 101.000 to Design Cainage 263460) Section (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phase 1 of Bharata Pariyojana in the State of Rajasthan (Package 2) 0.3.7 Settlement There are about 15 major / minor settlements along the Project Highway. Anupgarh, Gharsana, Rojhri, Chhattargarh, Sattasar and Pugal are some of the major settlements. 0.38 Major and Minor Intersections ‘There are 96 junctions formed due to different type of intersecting roads with the project highway. Out of these, 7 are major junctions and remaining 89 are minor junctions, 0.3.9 Existing Major and Minor Bridges and Culverts ‘The project road has I major bridge (span exceeding 60 m), 4 minor bridges(span between 6 mto 60 m) and 204 culverts. The details are given in Table 0.1. ‘Table 0.1: Summary of Existing Bridges and Culverts No. of Bridges _ No. of Culverts 1 Location ‘Total Major | Minor | Pipe | Slab | Syphon | Slab/Pipe | Blocked 1 4 o 122 - | 0 | 29 Total 5 209 0.3.10 Railway Crossings 04 041 There is one existing Railway Level Crossings located on the project highway on Anupgarh ~ Suratgarh line near Anupgarh town, ‘TRAFFIC SURVEY © Classified traffic volume count survey at 6 locations in six homogenous sections © Turing movement survey at 9 major junction + O-D survey at 4 — locations © Axle load survey at 3-locations Homogenous Sections ‘The traffic homogeneous sections have been identified based on the major traffic generators and diversion locations along the project corridor. The passenger traffic has been observed to vary with respect to the influence of village/towns falling along the project corridor. The Project highway runs in North-South direction with cross roads in East-West direction. The influence of traffic on the West is limited as itis close to Indo- Pakistan border having very thin population. ‘The major influence centres are the two district headquarters, Ganganagar on the North and Bikaner on the South. Major town on route are Karanpur, Raisinghnagar, Anupgarh and Gharsana. Major centres of rattic on the eastern side are Padampur, Vijayanagar and Suratgarh, whereas major habitations + een see Gente rs Aen 9,58 ew STUP Consultants Pv. Lid in aseociabon wih ‘Sugam Technocrats Pvt Lid.‘Construsion/aperadation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar to ugal (Design Chainage 101.000 to Design Chainage 263460) Sstio (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phase I of BharatmalaPariyoanain she State of Rajasthan (Package-2) market centres on the west are RawlaMandi-Khajuwala and Pugal-Dantaur. With a view to capture section wise traffic flow characteristics, based upon the major intersections the total stretch has been segmented in to six homogeneous sections, as given in Table 0.2. ‘Table 0.2: Traffic Homogenous Section ae Homogeneous Section 1 ‘Ganganagar - Karanpur and Ganganagar bypass (NH62 at Sadhuwali to Z- minor) 2p a a 3 Raisinghnagar-Anupgarh | 4 ‘Anupgarh-Gharsana | 5 Gharsana-Sattasar - on cia [seen oo — 0.4.2 Classified Traffic Volume Count (CVC) ‘The summary of 7 days classified traffic volume survey is given in Table 0.3, ‘Table 03: Summary of Classified Volume Count Survey at all Counts Stations fat] Son | tout | app | iiibutonl | Peak S| Location | Moving | Moving| Aapr | ADT Peake | peak | Peak |No. Vehicles) Vehicles eeu) Tee | Hour ‘Traffie%) |] ecu) | ecu) | cor up | Down : i | = ! saz | 164 | sao6 | ass | so | so | an —— = { aio | 207 | 4396 | 3s | a9 | st | 40s | Km 71.600 | 3 | Raisinghnagar | toanupgam | 6786 | 233 | 7019 | sos) so} so | ssi | isi | rs | Kin 118.300 aS | | Anupgarh = e 1 Gharsana ous | 285 | 6400 | saz] si | a9 | ast | i617 | 75 Kin 147.000 - | Oharsana to | | sauasae seas | 246 | soso | sass] si | a9 | 326 | iste | 79 ‘Km 182.000 Satasarto Poosal ssa | 7 | sao0 | ani | as | sz | maz | io | os Km 237.650 | el) ees SUP Consukants Pt Ldn inion wih on Technora Pt Lid e o~ oF = g NSdAN Ai Team Leader fi od STUP Consultants Pvt Ltd et PTET eh imassociton wit RAY gett ‘Sugam Technocrats Pvt. Lid. enConsirucon/upgradaton of two lates with paved shoulders of NH from Raisnghnagar to Ppa (Design Chainage 101,000 to Design Chainage 263.460) Section (length 162460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phas of Bharamala Priyojana in the State of Rajasthan (Package 2). 0.43 Axle Load Survey The vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) values as per axle load survey are as given below in Table 0.4. ‘Table 0.4: VDF Values Average VDF — Bus Lev zame | Sante | NU le Sadhuwali 0.77 025 1 gs2ies|Pme| Raisinghnagar 074 0.40 3.78 6384 | 5.054 Patroda 0.96 0.06 624 1404 | 10698 | 0.4.4 Growth Rate A comparative analysis of growth rates by various methods and adopted growth rates are given in Table 0.5. ‘The traffic data in terms of various types of trucks like 2-Axle, 3-Axle, multi-axle and LCV was not available, a realistic growth of 7% for 3-Axle and multi-Axle trucks and LCV is proposed as growth in 2-axle trucks is declining and there is corresponding increase in 3-axle and multi-axle trucks. ‘Table 0.5: Comparative Analysis and adopted Growth Rates ] T | S | Description Whaaer | Careep | Bus a Truck fa ‘Trend Growth of Vehicles 1086 | 10.14 [480 | 3.37 | | 27T Growth from regression analysis_|_11.20 | 10.46 | 4.77 | 3.71 | > Average 11.03 10.30 [4.79 | 3.54 [4 |Adopted for traffic growth U1 5 For the purpose of traffic forecasts, keeping in mind various uncertainties, like, slow down or accelerated growth of economy, alternative roads/modes, etc, the traffic growth rates have been estimated under three scenarios, namely: * Realistic scenario ~ based on the recommended socio-economic variables and elasticity estimates. . istic scenario ~ growth rates 15% more than realistic scenario. © Pessimistic scenario ~ growth rates 15% less than realistic scenario. Estimates of traffic growth rates under the above three scenarios are given in the Table 0.6, Fcc Geeta = yr NS JAIN “Team Leader STUP Consultants Pvt Ltd is asciaton with Sugam Technocrats Pvt. LtdCConstrecon/upgradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH fom Raisinghnapar to Popa (Design Chainage 101,000 10 Design Chainage 268 460) Section length 162460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report ‘under Phase of BharatmalaPriyjana inte State of Rajasthan (Package 2). ‘Table 0.6: Estimated Traffic Growth Rates Se | period | azo | Career | Bus Waccter Realistic Scenario in % 1] Upw2021 | 110 | 100 [so] 50 2 [2022-2026 |~100 | 90 [5.0] 50 3 [2027-2031 | 9.0 80 | 50] 50 4 | 2032-2036 | 8.0 7.0 | 50 | 5.0 [5 [Beyond 2036 “50 | 5.0 | 50 | 1] Upto 2021 375 22022 -2026 5.0 | 6s 9 _| 3 | 20272031 5.0 [5.75 | 5.75 | 5.75 4 | 2032-2036 | 9.2 5.0 3.0) 5 | Beyond 2036 | 8.05 50 5.0_| 1 Upto2021 | 9.35 ss_|so| so | so | 5% me 2022-2026 [8.5 765 [50] 50 | 50] 51 3] 2027-2031 | 7.65 | 68 | 50] 50 | 50 [50 4 [2032-2036 | 68 | 5.95 [50 | 50 [50 | 50 [ST Beyond 595 | 51 | 50) 50 | 50 | 50 According to IRC:37-2012, Clause 4.2.2 and IRC: S of 5% growth rate has to be adopted. 045 Capacity Analysis ‘As per the Ministry Circular RW / NH-33044/37/2015/S&R dated 26-05-2016, for the purpose of augmentation of the facilities and up-gradation of the Project Highway, the design service volume of the plain terrain condition and LOS B is given in Table 0.7. ‘Table 0.7: Design Service Volume for Different Lane Configurations | Design Service Volume (PCUs per day) Level of Service B 10000 _ ‘The present day traffic is less than 10,000 PCU in the entire Section. Therefore 4 Laning is not qualified at this stage. cori cee G) sermon a ead NS oe TUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd. in association wih ‘Sugem Technocrais Pvt. Lid‘Consirucion/upgradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar to Pagal (Design Chsinage 101.000 to Design Chainage 263.460) Section length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phase of Bharamala Pariyojuna inthe State of Rajasthan (Package-2) 0s Improvement Proposals Implementation of development proposals of the Project highway has been proposed in ‘two work packages. For this purpose, road section from end of Raisinghnagar bypass km 101.000 to junction of proposed Pugal bypass with Dantour road_km 263.460 has been included in Package-2. Total length of the project highway in Package-2 is 162.460 km. Various improvements proposed for the up gradation of existing twofintermediate lane project road to two lane with paved shoulder have been described in detail in Chapter-6 “Improvement Proposals”. Proposed improvements are briefly summarized below: 0.5.1 Geometric Alignment Ithas been proposed to improve the horizontal geometries of the entire stretch to cater to a design speed of 100 km per hour. However, wherever there are site constraints, the ‘minimum design speed shall be kept as 80 km per hour. The vertical alignment generally conforms to required standard, It has been proposed to improve the substandard vertical geometrics of the stretches by providing ruling gradient of 2.5%. Minimum 3.3% Limiting sradient will be provided wherever it is not feasible to provide ruling gradient. For the towns / built up areas where in improvement of geometrics to the required minimum standard is not feasible due to the non-availability of adequate ROW, provision of bbypass/re-alignment is proposed. The vertical alignment in the section from km 180,000 to 263.460 is quite undulating and improvement to 100 km per hour design speed and intermediate sight distance is not feasible. For this section the design speed is proposed as 80 km per hour. There are few locations where gradient will be more than 2.54% 0.5.2. Proposed Bypasses Based on the site visit, available ROW and present land width between buildings / structures, ROW required for widening to 2-lane with paved shoulders in major built up areas, geometrics of the existing road and associated problem of land acquisition / dismantling of structures, itis proposed to provide bypasses at following locations. ‘The details are as given in Table 0.8. ‘Table 0.8: Summary of Bypasses Ss. Proposed Chainage es ‘Name of Bypass a = Proposed Length (km) [a Pugal 259.7150 | 263.460 3.710 0.5.3 Re-Alignments It is proposed to re-align the project road in 2 stretches as below: i) At Gharsana, the existing bridge over Anupgarh Shakha canal is required to be widened, but there is habitation on both sides. Therefore, road is proposed to be realigned and new bridge will be constructed on the new alignment, vt Lid. in association with 2 cain @) sentence - Xs am Leader STUP Consultants Pv. Lid assoc.aon wi Sugam Technocrats Pvt. LidCConsreton/spgadaton of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar to Pugal (Design Chainage 101,000 to Design Chinage 263.460) Section (ength 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report tnder Phase 1 of BharatmalaPariyojana in the State of Rajasthan (Package) ii) At Ch 216 there is bridge on Indira Gandhi Main Canal. The alignment of the road ‘on both sides is quite deficient. Therefore, itis proposed to improve the alignment and construct bridge on new alignment. Table 0.9 summarizes re-alignment ‘Table: 0.9 Re-alignment | posed Chainage = | To Total Remarks | I (km) _|Length (m) es awe Re-alignment due to congested area of old | 174.180 3740 | Gharsana town portion | Re-alignment due to poor geometries of the | 2 | 215970 } 219315 | 3800 | road | 0.54 Widening Itis proposed to widen the existing 2-lane/intermediate lane carriageway road to Standard 7.0 m wide2-lane carriagewaywith1.5 m wide paved shoulders on either side configuration. In built up sections where bypass is not proposed, provision shall be made for space for Utilities 2 m width at the edge of ROW on either side, in addition to 2x 1.5m wide footpath cum drain. Concrete pavement will be provided in the entire available space between the footpath cum drain to overcome maintenance related issues, as per Fig. 5.3. In order to have minimum land acquisition issues for the project road and particularly in urban/built up areas to ensure maximum utilization of existing carriageway, itis proposed to follow concentric widening scheme in general for up gradation of intermediatetwo lane carriageway to two lane carriageways with paved shoulder. 0.5.5 Improvement of Junctions ‘At major junctions where NH/SH, or an important road crosses/meets the project road, grade separated structures have been proposed. In case of other intersecting roads, at grade ‘major junctions are proposed. All minor junctions are proposed as at grade intersections. For the new bypasses of the project road, grade separated intersections are proposed in order to make the bypasses access controlled as far as possible as provided in IRC:SP:73. Details are given in Table 0.10 STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd. insssciton win Sugam Technocrats PV. Lid,Consuontppadtion of wo lanes with paved shoulders of NH fom Raisinghnagar to Pagal (Design Chainage 10.000 o Design Cainage 26846) Secon (eng 1260 k=) Daft Detailed Project Report dr Phase of Bharata Prigoan in he Stat of Rajasthan (Pakage) Table: 0.10 Junction Improvement Proposed Improvement “| ‘Type ol Grade - | Number | separated At Grade junction | junction | | 1 | Major Junctions 8 6 2 12 Minor Junctions 7 - 7 0.5.6 Bridges and Culverts 0.5.6.1 Bridges: ‘There are 5 existing bridges on the existing alignment of the project road comprising 1 major bridge and 4 minor bridges. Out of these, one major and one minor bridge are proposed for reconstruction and one minor bridge is retained without widening, Apart from this, 2 new minor bridges in re-alignment in lieu of the existing bridges and 6 culverts are proposed to be reconstructed as new minor bridges. Improvement proposals for bridges are summarized in Table 0.11. ‘Table 0.11: Improvement Proposal for Major/Minor Bridges Si. | “Type of improvement of | No. of Remarks No. bridge Structures a A Includes 6 culverts converted into minor bridges ‘One major bridge and one minor 1 | New construction 2 | Reconstruction 2 lendge 7 3_| Widening a — 4 | Retained without widening ~ | With repairs 5__[ Repair and rehabilitation = 05.6.2 Culverts ‘The pipe culverts, which are having diameter less than 900 mm are proposed to be replaced by pipe of 1200 mm diameter keeping in view the constraints and inadvertence of ‘maintenance. Similarly the culverts other than pipes having widths and heights less than 1.5 m have been proposed to be replaced by Box culverts as appropriate to maintain the vertical profile. All other existing culverts have been recommended for \widening/repair/reconstruction. Additional culverts have been proposed in bypasses and re-alignments, = YB ster commana 14 in acini wi ae ee nsuan Team Leeder SSTUP Consultants Pvt. Lid Sugam Technocrats Pvt. idCConsration/opgradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisnghnagar to Popa (Design Chainage 101,000 to Design Chainage 268-460) Section (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Projeet Report ‘under Phas of Bharatmala Pariyojanain the ute of Rajasthan (Package2). Out of total 204 existing culverts of the project road, 13 culverts are falling on existing road which are proposed to be abandoned due to bypasses/re-alignments. A total 12 new culverts are proposed on the bypass and re-alignment stretches. Improvement measures as proposed are summarized in Table 0.12 ‘Table 0.12: Improvement Proposals of Culverts SL | Typeof | Exist! New | 2. ‘Abandon/} S ae Ne | Comers _| ime | Prosvea| Reconstruction | Af Widening | Remarks 1 ‘All pipe culverts | for reconstruction | eee (1302 Ss 2 ‘are proposed to Eseeoe | Ease eee s box culverts. 2 6 Culverts are SlabiBox | 122 | 12 a 7 47 | converted into : a __|_minor bridges. | 3 All blocked structures are Bid | 12 2 ° | ! ~ | proposed to box meee | culvert. 4 | Syphon | 3 | - | 2 : 1 | 5 | SlabiPipe | - - . 5 | | Total = 204 | 12 | nn | 0.5.7 ROB Itis proposed to replace existing level crossings near Anupgarh town of the project road with ROB. The ROB will be 4-lane standard as per provisions of IRC: SP: 73. 0.5.8 Vehicular Under Pass (VUP)/Light Vehicul Under pass (LVUP) Vehicular underpass are proposed to be provided at the intersection of the project road with ‘National/ State highways and important roads and especially on the proposed bypasses so as to make them access controlled, as far as possible. Light vehicular underpass are proposed at cross roads with moderate traffic. Total 8 VUP and 2. LVUP are proposed along the project road. VUP/LVUP shall be 2 lane wide structure in conformity with IRC:SP:73. 0.5.9 Road Side Drainage: ‘To overcome the problems of water stagnation along the side of the road and water logging. ‘on the road in the built up area due to inadequate drainage facilites along the project highway unlined side drain in open area and RCC drain cum footpath on both sides in built up areas Pence G) Seman =e aes, A 13 oy Lee, crore n pa ne i associaon wit nant Sugam Technocrats Pvt. LtdCConsrcton/opgradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH fom Raisinghnapar to gal (Design Chinage 101.000 to Design Chinage 263.460) Section (length 162.460 km) raft Detailed Project Report under Phase of BharatmalaPariyojanain the tae of Rajasthan (Package-2) have been proposed. The drain will be joined to the nearest culvert to drain our water. Additionally balance culverts have been proposed along the new bypasses / realignments. 0.5.10 Road Markings: Painted road marks will be used to delineate the carriageway lanes and paved shoulders. | Pavement markings are proposed with carriageway centre-line, edge line, continuity line, stop line, markings, writings and zebra crossings ete 0.5.11 Road Signs: Adequate road signs are proposed for the project highway in order to provide advance information to regulate / control traffic flow and ensure safety of operations. All normal warning, regulatory and information road signs will be provided in accordance with relevant codal requirements. Advance cautionary signs are proposed at sharp curves at the outer edge of the curves. Overhead gantry signs have been proposed at start and end points of VUPs, Toll Plaza locations and at regular interval on the project road, 0.5.12 Safety Barrier RCC crash barrier has been proposed as a separator in between main carriageway and footpath at the side of all majot/ minor bridges and ROBs. RCC crash barriers are also proposed to be provided at the sides of all VUPs. For culverts, RCC parapet has been proposed. W-metal crash barrier is proposed to be provided for embankment height more than 3m, 0.5.13 Project Facilities Project facilities are proposed as below: Bus bays and bus shelters: 34 Nos on either side (Total 68 Nos) ‘Truck Layby 1 Number on either side (Total (2 Nos) at Design Ch 141.700 Toll Plaza 2 Numbers (Design Ch 102.500 km and Ch 163.000 km) 0.5.14 Service Road/Slip Road Service/slip roads of 5.5 m wide are proposed at both sides of the VUP/LUP and ROB approaches. Total length of service/slip roads is 15.782 km. NB remnant omen G) mee Ain gaoes by on 7 pre NSJAIN RTT Ns leat aT srr anda Us ‘Sugam Technocrats Pvt. Ltd‘Construction/upgradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH fom Raisinghnagar to Pugal (Design Chainage 101.000 to Design Chainage 263460) Section (Length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phas of Bharatmala Priyojana in the State of Rajasthan (Package-2) 06 Pavement Design Itis proposed to provide flexible pavement for the new pavement in bypasses/realignments and make use of existing pavement which is in reasonable good condition in substantial length of the project road by strengthening it with bituminous overlay. In built up areas which have not been bypassed, rigid pavement is proposed to be provided in the entire available space between the footpath cum drain to overcome maintenance related issues. Pavement composition as well as overlay requirement of existing pavement has been estimated on the basis of various factors such as Traffic volume and loading, sub-grade strength and environmental characteristics. 0.6.1 Design Traffic ‘The cumulative standard axle based on VDF and commercial traffic has been computed and is tabulated below along with BBD summary in Table 0.13 ‘Table 0.13: Design Traffic and Other Details Traffic | BBD ; From | To =| Homogenous Section | pry | _quimy | Lenath(km) ‘Ganganagar - Karanpur | 0,000 | 49.500 Karanpur-Raisinghnagar | 49.500 | 85.300 Si. No. [3 Raisinghnagar-Anupgarh | 85.300 | 132.595 4 | Anupgarh-Gharsana | 132.595 | 162.075 ‘S| Gharsana-Sattasar 162.075 | 213.000 6 _| Sattasar ~ Pugal 213.000, 0.6.2 Design of New Pavement Design of new flexible pavement has been carried out as per IRC:37. The design CBR of 10% has been adopted as the CBR of existing subgrade is found to be more than this value in most of the Section. The design and proposed composition of new pavement is shown in Table 0.14 and Table 0.15 respectively. From the point of view of better workability and in the light of only minor difference in the requirement of thicknesses of bituminous layers, a uniform thickness of pavement of 585 mm with identical composition had been proposed throughout the project road. Pavement in Widening portion and Paved Shoulders Pavement in Widening portion and Paved Shoulders shall be same as that for new construction, Fegan Goer a a sal earl eae é. ‘STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd wk imassoeaton wit ‘Sugam Technocrats Pvt. Ltd.CConsruton/opgradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar to Pal (Desien Chainage 101.000 to Design Cinage 263460) Section (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phase of Bharatmala Pariyojana inthe State of Rajasthan (Package-2) ‘Table 0.14: Design Composition of New Pavement Design Section Nee | GSB | WMM ‘Ganganagar-Karanpur 24 [200 ‘[Karanpur- Raisinghnagar | 20 | Raisinghnagar-Anupgarh | 41 ‘Anupgar-Gharsana a2 Gharsana-Sattasar 33 | Sattasar-Pugal 29 ‘Table 0.15: Proposed Composition of New Pavement [ a ] ~ Total [se |Pavementtaver | | mm) | Cem) | Gm) | CESS = = =I (mm) |! | Proposed 200 | 250 | 95 | 40 585 2. | Layer Composition | 1x200 | 2x125 | 1x95 | 1x40 - Note: GSB shalll be provided in full formation width. 0.6.3 Design of Overlay for existing Pavement Overlay for strengthening of existing flexible pavement has been designed as per provisions of IRC:81 for the assessed traffic and observed characteristic deflection of the existing pavement. The details of overlay thickness as per design and proposed overlay thickness are presented in Table 0.16.From the point of view of better workability (10 ‘match bituminous overlay in the existing pavement and bituminous layers of widening portion so as to avoid problem of compaction in small widening width) and requirement of uniform and continuous wearing course in the entire carriageway as also very small difference in requirement of overlay thickness for various road sections, a uniform thickness of 40 mm AC plus 95 mm DBM is proposed in the entire project highway. ‘Table 0.16: Computed and Proposed Overlay Thickness ‘Existing Required | Equivalent | | Proposed | Mean Ace Dam thickness , Overlay | ACIDBM ACSDBM sen | AREY Jae | rete et AEN Tt, $M | Pavement beac (eam) | (eum) _| tom | 1 ae 285 | 24 | 2.170 192 | 134 | 40494 | 40495 | — | | Karanpur to | 2. 306, 20 2.079 190 | 133 40493 40495, Raisinghnagar | mee cant coma G) Sen on tor oe M6. et Team 1, BEE STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd ‘eee vi Sugem Technocrals Pvt. LtdCConsruton/opgradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisnghnapar to ual (Design Chainage 101.000 to Design Chairage 263.460) Section (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phase 1 of BharatmalaPariyojana inthe tac of Rajashan (Package) lng am | Resse] auivalent roped s. thickness Overlay | AC/DEM. AcsDBM Ne | Sectom at | MSA | Characteristic) cyickness| Thickness | TS) Thickness Deflection (mm (mm) [a eas Pavement | (um) | (um) um) 3 | Raisinghmmeat | seo | at 1.631 170 119 | 40479 | 40495 * | to Anupgarh a | | - Anupembio | sig | a2 | 1613 168 | 118 | 40478 | 40495 Gharsana ae Gharsana to ; 40495 | © | san sos | 33 | ts | am | ras | aves | soiss | eee 313 | 29 | 2.100 192 134 | 40494 | 40495 _| Pugal eens 1 0.6.4 Rigid Pavement Design Rigid pavement has been designed in compliance with IRC: 58. Rigid pavement consists of Pavement quality concrete (PQC) slab resting on Dry Lean Concrete (DLC) sub base, separated by a debonding layer of PVC sheet over DLC, laid over Granular Subbase (GSB) supported by the Subgrade. Proposed crust composition is presented in Table 0.17 ‘Table 0.17: Proposed Pavement Compositions SLNo | ps | Thickness ] Remarks 1 [pec | 300 = 2 [pvcsheet | 125 Micron 3 [pic 150 | 3 | | mm 4 | csp 150 mm 5 [Subgrade | 500 mm | > Dowel Bars Deformed dowel bars are proposed to be used at transverse joints of the rigid pavement. Recommended dimensions of tie bars based on detailed design of dowel bars are given in Table 0.18 ‘Table 0.18: Details of Deformed Dowel bars Description mm Diameter 36 ‘Spacing between dowel bars [ 300 [Length a I 450 Bremerton) eaeCConsructon/ypradation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar to gal (Design Chainage 101.000 to Design Chinage 263.460) Section (length 162.460 km) raft Detailed Project Report under Phase I of BharatmalaPariyojanain the State of Rajasthan (Package 2) > Tie Bars Deformed tie bars are proposed to be used at longitudinal joints of the rigid pavement Recommended dimensions of tie bars based on detailed design of tie bars are given in ‘Table 0.19 ‘Table 0.19: Details of Deformed Tie bars Description om Diameter 12 [ Spacing between Tie bars 375 Length 650 0.7 Social Assessments As part of the project feasibility inital social assessment (social screening) is undertaken in parallel with the Environment, Engineering and Economic analysis in order to determine any significant social issues which require further analysis during the Social Impact Assessment study and preparation of Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Project. Initial Social Assessment analyses the critical social issues, identified during the site visi based on information supplied by the district administrative authority and identified during the community consultation. The results of these analyses will formulate a guideline to clearly identify social conflicts of the highway development project and will also help to formulate action plan to resolve the issues asa precursor to preliminary engineering design and undertaking the required preparation of Resettlement Action Plan (RAP). Initial Social Assessment of the Project is on the basis of whether it involves Project Affected Persons (PAPs) and/or Indigenous People (IP) or Scheduled Tribes. This information whether the project involves PAPs or IPs can be ascertained based on the information collected through the socio-economic survey, verification of assets and losses and consultations with the residents at the Project locations Keeping in mind the aims and objectives of the Initial Social Assessment& Social Screening, tools have been used are - Social Screening Survey formats, Field testing of formats, Screening survey, Collection of secondary data, Compilation of data, Analysis, Preparation of the report. Preliminary Social assessment indicates the fact that for widening of the road about 120 ha of additional land (Agriculture and non-agriculture) need to be acquired. Due to the proposed widening, 26 houses, 20 shops/commercial structures and 4 public structures will be impacted in the entire stretch. The main reason for least impact on structure is that the affected villages are scattered and located along the road alignment at some places. © sen ener | S \y ns JAIN Leader. et Lid, aon sugem technocrats Pvt. Lis‘Construction/sppradaton of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH fom Raisiaghnagar to Pogal (Design Chainage 101.000 to Design Chainage 263.460) Section (length 162.260 =) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phas of BharatmalaPariyojanain the State of Rajasthan (Package 2) Impact on Trees Due to widening of the project road 8818 trees will be impacted on the linear strip adjacent to the to the project highway. Based on score obtained by various social attributes the impacts will be categorized as MEDIUM. Land will be acquired and compensation for land and structures will be paid as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (also Land Acquisition Act, 2013). A detailed Social Impact ‘Assessment (SIA) and a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) will be prepared for the project. In case of indigenous groups being affected, a Tribal Development Plan (TDP) would be prepared. ‘The land use along the project road is mainly agricultural cultivation (Wheat, cotton, Mustard) except in built up areas. The population of the area mainly depend on agriculture. 5 km distance from the alignment has been considered as study area for preliminary environmental assessment baseline studies. Secondary data collected from various Governments, Semi- Government organizations and site visits for various attributes like climate, physical environment, meteorology, ambient air quality, surface water and Ground water quality, soil characteristics, noise levels and flora & fauna. No forest land will be diverted for non-forest purpose. Due to widening of the road about 17 religious structures comprising 11 temples, 5 mosques and 1 gurudwara, 26 houses and 20 shops will be affected either partially or completely. The project road passes through some water bodies which will have partial impact. These water bodies are in the form of fishing pond, community pond, canal, ditches, streams and river. Due to widening of the project road about 8010 trees will be affected, which are the within Proposed ROW. Based on score obtained by various environmental attributes from the environmental screening exercise the impacts will be categorized as MEDIUM. ‘The key issues identified during the screening study are: # Felling of roadside trees + Impact on River and streams ‘© Impact on religious structures ‘Impact on settlements along the road due to widening of the roads Fnac Gent a ei 20 a Me ‘ em Lead STUP Consultants Pvt Ld in acsociaton win ‘Sugam Technocrats Pvt. LidCConstructon/ppradation of two lanes with pave shoulders of NH from Raisnghnagar to ual (Design Chinage 101.000 o Design Chanage 263.460) Section (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report ‘under Phase of BharatmalaPariyojanain the State of Rajashan(Package-2). ‘© Impact on markets and commercial establishments along the road due to widening ‘© Availability of water for road construction © Impact on natural drainage pattern of the area. * Impact on community water resources and water storage arrangements. ‘Material for high embankments © Scarcity of earth and availability of borrow areas. * Disposal of Excess earth from hill cutting * Protection of disposal sites * Location of underpass, overpass, pedestrian crossings, catle crossing migratory path, in consultation with local people. ‘© Road safety and safety during construction and operation of the road. ‘© Highway related diseases — HIV and AIDS 0.8 Environmental Screening and Preliminary Assessment Asa part ofthe project feasibility study, Environmental Impact Screening is undertaken in parallel with the Economic and Engineering Analysis in order to determine any significant economic, social or environmental issues which could require further analysis (including the analysis of alternative alignments, improvement of junctions etc.) to resolve such issues. The environmental screening analyse critical natural habitats (e.g. national parks, wild life reserves, sanctuaries, sacred groves, protected areas, forests, water bodies etc.), ‘major rivers and waterways, recorded cultural heritage sites and any other potentially sensitive areas, based on recent GOI census official data and information from NGOs and site visits, The results of this analysis plotted on maps and tabulated to clearly identify any ‘major conflicts with proposed road improvements. The nature and extent of such conflicts and recommendations concerning how to resolve them (including recommendation for exclusion, analysis of altemative alignment and/or mitigation) as a precursor to preliminary engineering design and undertaking the required for environmental assessment studies. ‘However, an EIA report has to be prepared on the existing baseline scenario and the results from the assessment and evaluation of the environmental impacts that may arise during the construction and operation of the proposed development. This report also highlights the post project environmental monitoring plan and environment management system considered to be necessary during the construction and operation. ‘This EIA report will be organized in as per guidelines of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification of 14% September 2006 (EIA notification 2006), and Standard TOR of MOE Highway Projects (2015). Bremer omen Gene oa ae 2 NS JAIN Team Leader STUP Consultants Pvt. Lc in asociaton with ‘Sugam Technocrats Pvt. Lid,Constrston/ypratation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar to Pugal (Design Chainage 101,000 to Design Chainage 263 460) Section (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report under Phase of Bharasmala Pariyjana in the State of Rajasthan (Package 2) 0.8.1 Packaging: For the implementation of development of project highway, the packaging for the project as approved by NHAT is as under: Package 1: Ganganagar bypass (NH-62 at Sadhuwali) - Z-minor) and NH62 (junction with of old Suratgarh road) at Ganganagar - Z-minor to end of proposed Raisinghnagar bypass. Length = 111.741 Km (Approx) Package 2: End of Raisinghnagar bypass to the junction of proposed Pugal bypass with Dantour road. Length = 162.460 km (Approx) 0.9 Estimated Cost Of The Project: Preliminary cost estimate for the Project Highway has been worked out for each package as above based on the improvement proposals, quantities calculated for various items of works and the latest Schedule of Rates 2016 ~ 17 of Rajasthan applicable for National Highways in Bikaner and Ganganagar Districts, Rates have been analysed as per Ministry's data book. The basis rates of bitumen has becn taken from IOCL refinery at Panipat, which is nearest. The rates of Cement and Steel (SAIL, have been taken from ONAM PRO site as of Dec 2017. The bbase Civil Cost works out to Rs 716.76 Crores (Rs 4.41 Cr per km), ‘The Centages have been applied as per Ministry's norms as applicable for projects for implementation on EPC mode. Total cost including Centages works out to Rs 845.78 Crores (Rs 5.20 Crores/km) Provision has been made for Land Acquisition: Rs. 13.59 Cr for 65.437 Ha of land to be acquired and Rs 32.20 Crores for utility shifting based on preliminary assessment. Provision of Rs 3.74 Crores has been made for environment mitigation/tree cutting/plantation, ete. Total Project Cost including contingencies, Centages, LA, utility shifting, etc., works out to Rs. 895.31 Crores. An abstract of cost estimate is attached, 0.9.1 Justification of Cost The normative cost as per Ministry's letter dated 10.08.2016 based on BK Chaturvedi Committee Report for two lane with paved shoulders for 2016-17 is Rs 4.606 Crores including ‘centages. In the present package the civil cost including centages works out to Rs 5.20 Crores per km which is higher than the normative cost by Rs 0.786 Crores per km. The project has the following additional structures: ROB 1 Number of 4-lane uP 8 Numbers Light vehicular underpasses. 2 Numbers Major bridge I No. Canal Bridges 2Nos (55 m and 32.5 m long) Service/slip road 15.782 km (5.5 km wide) RE walls 14km ‘The cost of all these provisions is about Rs 230 Crores (Rs 1.41 Crores/km) Fret wana GY sem terrae a In association wih Sugem Technocrats Pvt. Lt‘Constration/upgradaton of two lanes with pave shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar to Pugal (Design Cainage 101.000 to Design Chainage 263460) Section (lengh 162.460 km) raft Detailed Project Report under Phase of BharatmalaPariyjana in the State of Rajasthan (Package-2) ‘The civil cost excluding major structures and service roads is Rs 3.98 Crores/km which is less than the normative cost for two lane with paved shoulders. In addition to above, the project has Realignmentbypasses at 3 locations (total length about 11.25 km). 0.10 Financial Analysis Based on the financial analysis considering the current toll policy and toll rates of 2008, escalated to current level, itis found that project is not viable on BOT (Toll) basis, at 40% grant and concession period of 25 years the result is as below: PIRR : 1.38% EIRR : 1.69% NPV: Rs-270 Crores. Since EIRR is less than 15% the, project is not viable for implementation on BOT(Toll) basis. Alternative implementation mode could be: 1. EPC 2. BOT (Annuity) 3. HAM 0.11 Recommendations a. Itis recommended that the project may be implemented on EPC mode, as it is not viable on BOT (Toll), b. In this Package-2 the additional land requirement is not very large and mostly in open area, project can be taken up on implementation on priority S Suga Tecoerat PL 019 NS e% Team Leader ‘STUP Consultants Pvt. Ltd, imassocaion wih « _ Sugem Technocrats Pvt. LidCConsrcton/operadation of two lanes with paved shoulders of NH from Raisinghnagar to ‘ugal (Design Chinage 101.000 to Design Chainage 263.460) Section (length 162.460 km) Draft Detailed Project Report ‘under Phase I of BharatmalaPariyana in the State of Rajasthan (Package 2). Bharatmala P-6 Package - 2 ABSTRACT COST OF BILLS Description Site Clearance and Dismantling oe Earthwork ~61,50,19,247 ular Sub Base and Base Course —1,04,37,81.341 Bituminous Course and Conerete Pavement 232,26 68,202 Culverts 39,67.71,768 Bridges, VUP, ROB si (65,64,64.786 RE wall .29.33,05,404 ‘Traffic Signs, Markings and Road Appurtenances 10,69,12,662, Lighting 20,71,28,000 ‘Toll Plaza 12,00,00,000 Horticulture 85,58,693 Drainage and Protection works Diversion Road __1,03,05,763 ‘Connecting Road 2,89,82.938 [RRR Sse Se Cost in crores ‘Say Rs.716.76Crore ‘Supervision Consultancy Charges @2 14, 5.53 ‘Administrative Charges @ 1% 7,16.16.262.77 jon @5% for 2 years ~~ 71,67,62.627.67 iaintenance Charges @ 5.0% for 4 years 35,83,81,313.83 Total Cost including Centages '845,77,99,008 Land Acquis 13,59,02,260 Utility Shifting = = Environment Mitigation/tree cutting/plantation, etc. LS. 3,74,35,672 GRAND TOTAL 895,31,10,311 Say Rs. 895.31 Crore © Rates for Year 2016-17 ca Pvt. Ltd. in section with 2 Sogn Pvt Lid. ie petoone @o-— 020 NSJAIN Team Leader IP Consultants Pvt. Ltd. —__ Inassecaion wit ‘Sugam Technocrats Pvt. Lid