MKT 833
MKT 833
1
COURSE DEVELOPMENT
Lagos.
Course Editor
Lagos.
Lagos.
2
MKT 833 – ADVERTISING MANAGEMENT
Module 1
Module 2
Module 3
Module 4
3
Module 1
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 OBJECTIVES
Advertising has a distant origin in ancient times. In fact, it is safe to say that
advertising started with the advent of the town crier and the street hawker. What
these people did was to shout their messages, telling people about their
products. Later on, another form of advertising was introduced with the advent of
tradesmen and craftsmen, who put trademarks and symbols on their products.
These trademarks and symbols grew to become identities of these products.
Palmer and a few others started as newspaper agents, which is slightly different
from what we have today. They engaged in selling newspaper spaces to tradesmen
and producers and collected a commission of 25 per cent. Today, this form of
commission system has continued in the advertising industry, though it could
5
sometimes be reduced to 15 or 10 per cent depending on bargaining and whether
the advertisement is A or B grade.
Indeed, the industrial revolution, which swept through Europe and other parts of
the world led to the introduction of marketing. Producers engaged in mass
production and, thus, realised that they needed to work harder to make the people
know about their products, the product prices and their uses, so that they can
dispose them more easily. This way, advertising also became recognised as part of
marketing.
6
The West African Publicity Limited had branches in Accra, Lagos and
Freetown. It was this same company that later became LINTAS Limited, a
reputable advertising agency in Nigeria today. Pathetically,, at the
inception of the West African Publicity Limited, the literacy level in
Nigeria was still very low, so the indigenous languages were used for
most of the, and they were then essentially for the UAC Group interests.
What could be regarded as the first meaningful advertising campaign
was done in 1948 for Kingsway Stores by the West African Publicity
Limited. In 1964, however, the West African Publicity Limited merged
with LINTAS International.
Records show that advertising billings rose from N10 million in 1972 to N54
million in 1974 and by 1982, it was estimated to be at about N300 million.
Presently, it runs into billions, as we shall later see in this course, indicating a
steady growth of advertising in the country, even though the sector continues to
be affected by the economic crunch as manufacturers scale down their advertising
budgets due to reduced production capacity. Thus, from the crude posters of the
West African Publicity Limited, advertising has become so sophisticated that many
aspects of our lives are affected by its impact. For example, since the return of
the country to democratic rule in 1999, politicians and political contestants as well
as their political parties from time to time embark on major adverting campaigns to
sell their manifestoes and candidates’ programmes. This is apart from the fact that
our cultural life, social life and all the economic activities are affected by
advertising in Nigeria today.
In simple terms, advertising is a sales tool. If we agree with this, it then follows
that we can stretch this further that advertising should be combined with other areas
of marketing. Therefore, we can be talking of advertising and public relations,
advertising and sales promotion, because the ultimate aim of advertising is to
sell a product, service or idea.
7
Indeed, advertising has lends itself to various definitions. Advertising as described
by the American Marketing Association, Chicago is basically “any paid form of
non-personal presentation of ideas, goods and services by an identified sponsor.”
4.0 CONCLUSION
SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
5.0 SUMMARY
In this unit, we have examined the various definitions of advertising and its origin
with particular reference to Nigeria.
9
UNIT 2 – ADVERTISING MANAGEMENT: MEANING, ROLE AND
SCOPE
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The next phase of the advertising management process has to do with deciding
exactly how to apply the data collected during the research stage. Here the basis for
deciding on what forms of advertising are most appropriate begins to take shape.
Depending on the specifics of the products and the nature of the niche markets that
the campaign will seek to connect with, advertising services such as print media, and
radio, television or the Internet may be deemed the most appropriate options.
Once the niche markets are identified and the determination of which types of
advertising media are most appropriate for the campaign, advertising management
focuses on the creation of the specifics of the overall campaign. This may involve
such elements as the development of print ads for use in magazines and newspapers,
audio campaigns for radio advertising, or commercials appropriate for television
broadcast or streaming across the Internet. Because any given campaign may use
several advertising options in one campaign, the process of advertising management
11
also involves making sure all strategies complement one another and present a
unified public image to consumers.
To do this, the business deploys a range of tools and techniques, collectively known
as the marketing mix: product formulation and variation; packaging; sales literature;
the sales force, selling either direct to consumers or to retail distributors; pricing;
sales promotion; direct mail; advertising; market research (see Figure 1.1). In
particular, it usually aims to do this through the use of branding. The distinction
between a product and a brand is important, because it explains much of what
marketing tries to do, and much of the use of advertisements.
12
Gross margin
The
Net sales value Costs and contribution The marketing mix
A brand is created by all the elements of the marketing mix working together,
consistently, to create a positive prejudice in people's minds: it has a place in their
minds, where a mere product is simply a means of fulfilling a physical need. Indeed,
it has been said that brands only exist in the minds of consumers. Certainly, a
successful brand is seen by its market as having both rational and emotional
characteristics that combine into a coherent and distinctive picture. The way a brand
acquires this status can be illustrated simply by a diagram—which is, of course, a
representation of the marketing mix (see Figure 1.2).
SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
Clearly, advertising is just one of the constituents of the mix that goes to build the
brand. Advertising exists to help to sell things. In the case of off-the-page direct
response ads, they actually do sell things, but mostly the process is less direct than
this.
Adverting
Name Pack design
Selling Point-of-sale
display
Sales literature
CONSUMER
THE
13 BRAND PREJUDICE
Public
Price
relations
Figure 2.2 How a brand fits together
What is reasonably certain, though, is that to do this will limit the brand's reach.
Advertising is an ideal tool for reaching large numbers of people economically.
There is a growing view that mass advertising and mass marketing are no longer the
way forward for most consumer businesses, but it is equally true that the alternatives
have their limitations. People still like to buy brands of which they have heard, and
which they believe to be popular, in some sense. Media advertising is still the
cheapest way of making sure that a brand is broadly known and recognized.
4.0 CONCLUSION
5.0 SUMMARY
15
UNIT 3 – INTEGRATED MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
16
One aspect of thinking about advertising and the marketing mix that is gaining
currency is the idea that advertising must go hand in hand with other parts of the
marketing mix—for instance, there is evidence that promotions are more effective,
and brand building, when they are combined with advertising. This is an element in a
change that has been developing for some years in how we approach advertising
within the overall marketing and marketing communications mix. Integrated
communications is now a well-established piece of jargon in the advertising and
marketing world, although there is still a considerable debate about precisely what it
means in practice, how to achieve it and who should be managing the process.
The principle is clear. If you accept that a brand is a combination of a product (which
can be a service, like life assurance or a meal in Mr. Biggs) and of the
communications about the product, it should go without saying that all the various
communications designed to help present and sell the brand to its target consumers
ought to work together to build a coherent, compelling picture of the brand.
They do not need all to be saying exactly the same thing, because they all work
rather differently: what is needed is synergy between them, to make the sum of the
communications more powerful than they would otherwise have been. Each of the
activities—PR, advertising, direct mail, trade promotions, consumer promotions,
packaging design, point-of-sale signage, brochures and other literature, spin-off
merchandise, sponsorship, the web site ... —will have its own individual role in
helping to achieve the marketing objectives for the brand. But each of them will also
have a role in contributing to the brand's reputation among its customers. Some will
communicate facts, or usage instructions and hints; some will be focused on
convincing the potential buyer that the brand is excellent value for money; some will
be providing it with positive and motivating associations; some will be calling
attention to the brand’s presence in the store, on the street, in a catalogue, on the
Internet.
In this unit, therefore, we shall consider what this concept means as well as discuss
the strategic goals of marketing communications.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
17
Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC) is a strategic marketing process
specifically designed to ensure that all messaging and communications strategies are
unified across all channels and are centred around the customer. The IMC process
emphasizes identifying and assessing customer prospects, tailoring messages to
customers and prospects that are both serviceable and profitable, and evaluating the
success of these efforts to minimize waste and transform marketing from an expense
into a profit-centre.
IMC is the use of coordinated messages and media on regular bases to consumers.
The messages are consistent and clear in all the channels of communication.
Databases are used to keep in touch with consumers. Repeat sales, customer attitudes
and related purchases are some of the tools used to measure the effectiveness of
IMC. Thus, IMC is the integrating and coordinating of a company’s
communications, so that the message delivered is consistent and clear in all channels
used. These channels include:
• Advertising - AV material, brochures, cinema, company vehicles,
directories, displays, leaflets, logos, packaging, package inserts, posters, point
of purchase displays, print advertisements, radio, symbols, television, transit,
outdoor (billboards), videotape;
• Direct marketing – Bill inserts, catalogues, direct mail, e-mail, internet, TV
shopping, telemarketing;
• Public Relations – Annual reports, community relations, company magazine,
donations, internet sites, press releases, lobbying, publications, seminars,
speeches, sponsorships;
• Personal Selling – Fairs, incentive programmes, presentations, trade shows;
• Sales Promotion – Allowances, contests, coupons, demonstrations, exhibits,
financing, incentive programmes, lotteries, premiums and gifts, rebates,
sampling, trade shows, trade discounts.
18
The advocates of integrated marketing communications tend to agree on the
following:
• there needs to be a consistent message in all communication vehicles;
• product design and packaging are integrated in the IMC plan;
• primary consumer research is key for targeting the right audience and
message;
• a customer database can also be used to target.
3.2 Integrated Marketing Communications Process
Figure 3.1 shows the 5-step IMC process, which can be highlighted as follows:
Marketers seek to communicate with target customers for the obvious goal of
increased sales and profits. Accordingly, they seek to accomplish several strategic
19
goals with their marketing communications efforts. We shall look at the following
goals:
1) Create Awareness
When products or brands have distinct images in the minds of customers, the
customers better understand the value of what is being offered. Positive images can
even create value for customers by adding meaning to products. Retail stores and
other organizations also use communications to build positive images. A major way
marketers create positive and distinct images is through marketing communications.
3) Identify Prospects
20
5) Retain Customers
Loyal customers are a major asset for every business. It costs far more to attract a
new customer than to retain an existing one. Marketing communications can support
efforts to create value for existing customers. Interactive modes of communication –
including salespeople and websites – can play an important role in retaining
customers. They can serve as sources of information about product usage and new
products being developed. They can also gather information from customers about
what they value, as well as their experiences using the products. This two-way
communication can assist marketers in increasing the value of what they offer to
existing customers, which will influence retention.
SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISE 1
1. Marketing communications perform many functions for consumers. What are
they?
2. Mention and explain the strategic goals of marketing communications.
4.0 CONCLUSION
5.0 SUMMARY
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational
Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson
South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition. New
Jersey:
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge &
Skills,
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition. London:
Wood, Marian B. (2007). Essential Guide to Marketing Planning. London: Prentice Hall.
22
UNIT 4 – THE AGENCY WORLD
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
2.0 OBJECTIVES
24
strategy, objectives and brief for each campaign or activity; ensure that the
brief is understood within the agency; and organize the agency's resources to
achieve the client's demands. This means that they have to understand the
client's business in detail and be, in effect, business associates for the client.
What's more, they are responsible to the agency's management for delivering a
satisfied client and a continuing profitable business.
Client
Account Agency
board
Account Creative
planning
Media
• Creatives: These are the ones with jeans and trainers and unpredictable habits,
who have the task of turning the brief into ideas that will sell. While they can
be extremely professional business people, with a real grasp of the realities of
the market, they are sometimes frustrated poets and artists manques, and less
disciplined than may seem ideal. Usually, creatives come in pairs ('teams'): an
artist or visual thinker, and a writer; though the artist Cart director') may not
be very good at drawing and the writer ('copywriter') can often be highly
visual as well as reasonably literate.
25
process.
• Media: The department's job is to plan and buy media. They work with the
rest of the team to identify the most effective and cost-efficient ways to reach
the target audience, and then negotiate with the media to buy the specific
spots or spaces to do the best job for the brand. With a growing range of
media research available on-line, they have to be computer-literate and
capable of extracting value from a mass of figures. Sharp negotiating skills
are needed, too, to get the best value from the media owners—media planners
and buyers are usually different people, though they have to work closely
together.
Normally, as a client, you rarely meet anyone from an agency outside these
functions, except for some of those involved in actually producing the ads, especially
the agency TV production team.
The traditional agency structure has become a target for rethinking. This has taken
two main forms: the hiving off of specialist functions into separate agencies and the
development of more or less radical new ways of organizing agencies. While the first
of these is longer established and more obviously successful, it is logical to start with
the second.
These factors have moved some agency managements to reorganize their businesses
in one of several directions. The most common is to structure the agency around its
clients, so that there is an office, or area of the office, for each account, with often—
the furniture, furnishings and decoration designed to reflect the client's business. The
idea is to create a focus for the account team, with an appropriate atmosphere to
ensure that they keep close to the brand and what it stands for. It also gives the client
the feeling that his or her interests are being closely cared for by a committed team—
whereas, in every agency, almost everyone works on several accounts, and the team
for each account will be different.
Closely related to the 'account room' approach, aided by modern technology, is the
'virtual account group' or 'virtual agency'. There is no real need to have everyone
working on the account in the same room, the same building or even the same
country. All you need is some carefully linked computers, an intranet, video-
conferencing and ISDN or equivalent connections. There are virtual agencies and
virtual departments in existence. The beauty of the virtual agency is that it can
include, or leave out, anyone or any function: if the client needs specialized advice, a
specialist consultant can join the team, for just as long as they are needed. If all that
26
is required is an occasional ad, there is no need to keep a permanent operation in
place.
Somewhere between these formats comes the use of 'hot desking'. Lots of agency
people spend much of their time out of the office, at meetings, producing
commercials or at photographic shoots, and space is expensive. So, in some areas of
the office, desks are available on a first-come, first-served basis. (When everyone
turns up at once, there's an unholy scramble.)
All this is trying, with varying degrees of success and conviction, to get away from
the things agencies have always criticized in their clients: a focus on products and
production and too little attention to the needs of customers. The traditional agency
format was specialty-driven, with the built-in assumption that creativity was the sole
property of the creative department. In practice, although it is the job of the creatives
to come up with the actual ads, anyone on the team should be able to contribute to
the creative process.
One advantage media shops have is that they can usually sell their services to
competing—`conflicting'—clients in the same field (in France, Carat handle 10 car
accounts). Ad agencies have always found this difficult, both because of their own
scruples about confidentiality and, more importantly, because few clients were
prepared to put their business into an agency working for a competitor. (There are
specialist agencies that handle competing clients within selected markets, but these
are mostly small.
Creative boutiques
Around the end of the 1960s, in the UK at least, several leading creative people from
27
agencies set up 'creative hot-shops', an idea that had originated a little earlier in the
US. These agencies originally did nothing but create ads to meet a brief from the
client. In time, they often found themselves acting as an extra creative resource for
agencies that found themselves under pressure, while the more successful ones, such
as The Creative Business, branched out to include account planners on their staff.
Nowadays, it is more common to find creative teams working as freelances, rather
than whole agencies. These freelances may work directly for a client, or supplement
the resources of an agency that finds itself short of time or talent.
Direct marketing
Direct marketing—direct mail, off-the-page selling and now direct response TV
(DRTV), radio and the Internet—has always been part of the advertising business.
Some of the industry's founding fathers and pre-eminent figures, have been direct
marketing specialists. For many years direct marketing has been regarded as a
distinct branch of advertising, and specialist agencies have developed to handle it.
As direct marketing becomes more and more a key element in many companies'
marketing, full-service agencies will expand their capabilities in this field: it
certainly makes sense, in terms of integrated marketing, to have media advertising
and direct marketing under common creative direction. Full-service agencies are
acquiring or merging with direct specialists, or actively developing their own skills
in the area, as well as moving into so-called 'new media' (the Internet and the World
Wide Web). This last area is teeming with small specialist agencies and con-
sultancies, though a shake-out seems inevitable.
Account planning
A relatively new phenomenon is the proliferation of specialist planning agencies.
There have been one or two of these in the UK for years—The Planning Shop and
The Planning Partnership, for example. The last few years have seen many more,
such as Red Spider and Forrest Associates, spurred by a combination of the recession
of the early 1990s and the realization that modern technology makes it perfectly
possible for planners to operate outside the walls of an agency. There is a developing
grey 'area between planning shops, marketing strategy consultants and market
research companies with a planning focus.
The rationale for planning specialists lies in the way in which planning has
developed: downsizing by agencies has led to planners being thinly spread across
accounts, and downsizing by advertisers has meant that marketing departments need
more help. Agency planners' ability to work in depth has been reduced. This provides
the opportunity for specialist organizations either to take over the planning role for
an agency, or to act as a supplementary source of ideas for agency or advertiser.
Management consultants
Recently, some senior agency managers have suggested that corporate managements
have turned to the big general consultancy firms for advice on brand strategy, thus
excluding ad agencies from a key traditional role and cutting off an important part of
the agency's influence with its clients.
28
It has been argued—probably rightly—by some agency thinkers that this fails to
recognize that agencies, uniquely among consultancy organizations, not merely
analyse and recommend strategies but create solutions to marketing problems, but
the threat remains.
There is some evidence of a trend for major advertisers to set their own strategies
and then run creative contests to see who can come up with the best ideas to fulfil
them. One logical conclusion of all this has been suggested by Coca-Cola's use of an
American creative talent shop, CAA, to produce creative ideas in response to briefs
developed by Coca-Cola's own marketers.
But how does a client decide who should pitch? The following screening questions
are important:
• Have they fully understood the brief?
• Do they know how to use market research? Can they contribute to our
thinking here?
• Is their strategic thinking sound?
• Is it imaginative? Have I learned anything useful from it?
• Are they professional and businesslike?
• Can I work with their senior people? And will they be actually working on my
business?
• Are their capabilities high in all key areas—management, strategy, creative,
media?
• Do they work well as a team—both among themselves and with our people?
• Is their creative work of a high quality?
• Is this confined to TV, or does it go across all media?
29
• Does this include below-the-line? New media? Can they offer an integrated
service?
• Do they have real expertise in the specialist areas which we are looking at,
e.g. direct marketing, new media?
• Can they work with us internationally (now or in the future)?
• How do they propose to evaluate the effectiveness of the campaign?
• What is their attitude to costs? Will they save us money?
• How will they relate to our media buying agency/ other specialists?
• Will they fit with our ways of working? Are they willing and able to be
business partners, or will they simply be suppliers? (This depends—of
course—on how we see our own style of dealing with agencies).
• How important to them will our account be? Will we be one of their larger
accounts, or simply a small fish in a very large pool?
Each client needs to determine in advance what the basis for its judgement will be:
this process is, in itself, a distinctly useful one, and may teach the company more
than it expects about how it handles the advertising process and its relationships with
agencies. Drawing up a score sheet, and deciding how it should be weighted, is an
essential basis for a rational decision in this area.
4.0 CONCLUSION
There is no doubt that fee systems are rapidly replacing commission, though the
residual value of the commission system is that it is conceptually and adminis-
tratively very simple to operate. The same is true of straightforward fee systems,
which are, in fact, usually proposed by agencies on the basis of calculations about
what the commission would have been. It is much more difficult to arrive at an
effective payment by results (PBR) system that both motivates and rewards the
agency and satisfies the client's desire for transparent value for money. A key factor
promoting PBR is the growing pressure on marketing management to make their
advertising budgets accountable: PBR provides a clear route to—at least—a specific,
measurable result from the advertising. Of course, it still leaves open the trickier
question of whether the advertising budget might have been better spent on other
activities.
SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISES
Does it make sense for a modern agency to offer a full service? What are the
arguments for and against?
5.0 SUMMARY
30
In this unit, we have been able to explain/discuss:
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational
Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson
South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition. New
Jersey:
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge &
Skills,
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition. London:
Wood, Marian B. (2007). Essential Guide to Marketing Planning. London: Prentice Hall.
31
Module 2
32
UNIT 1 – ESTABLISHING OBJECTIVES AND BUDGETING FOR
ADVERTISEMENTS
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Many companies have difficulty with the most critical step in the promotional
planning process – setting realistic objectives that will guide the developmental
process of Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) programme, and invariably,
advertisements. Complex marketing situations, conflicting perspectives regarding
what advertisements and other promotional mix elements are expected to
accomplish, and uncertainty over resources, make the setting of marketing
communications objectives ‘a job of creating order out of chaos’. While the task of
setting objectives can be complex and difficult, it must be done properly because
specific goals and objectives are the foundation on which all other promotional
decisions are made. Budgeting for advertisements and other promotional areas as
well as creative and media strategies and tactics, evolve from these objectives. They
also provide a standard against which performance can be measured.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
After a careful study of this unit, you should be able to:
• Discuss the DAGMAR approach to setting objectives for advertisements;
• Explain advertising budget;
• Discuss approaches to develop advertising budget;
• Discuss the various factors that influence allocation of advertising budget.
33
3.0 MAIN CONTENT
While the hierarchical model of advertising effects was the basic model of the
communications response process used in DAGMAR, Colley also studied other
specific tasks that advertising might be expected to perform in leading to the ultimate
objective of a sale. He developed a checklist of 52 advertising tasks to characterize
the contribution of advertising and serve as a starting point for establishing
objectives.
Characteristics of Objectives
According to Colley, objectives should be stated in terms of concrete and measurable
34
communication tasks, specify a target audience, indicate a benchmark starting point
and the degree of change sought, and specify a time period for accomplishing the
objectives(s).
Assessment of DAGMAR
The DAGMAR approach of setting objectives has had considerable influence on the
advertising planning process. Many promotional planners use this model as a basis
for setting objectives and assessing the effectiveness of their promotional campaigns.
DAGMAR also focused advertisers’ attention on the value of using communication –
based rather than sales-based objectives to measure advertising effectiveness and
encouraged the measurement of stages in the response hierarchy to assess a response
hierarchy. Colley’s work has led to improvements in the advertising and promotional
planning process by providing a better understanding of the goals and objectives
toward which planners’ efforts should be directed. This usually results in less
subjectivity and also leads to better communication and relationships between the
client and its agency.
SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
Discuss DAGMAR as an approach to setting objectives.
Advertising Budget
35
advertising budget. There are various approaches that can be used to set advertising
budget.
36
• Market Share Approach
Similar to competitive parity approach, the market share approach bases its
advertising spending on external market trends. With this method a business equates
its market share with its advertising expenditures.
According to this approach, all available profit is used in advertising spending. It can
be too risky for any size of organisation as the all available fund is used in
advertising and no fund is allocated to help business grow in other ways like-
technology up-gradation, or work force development. This approach is useful for
new business organisations trying to develop its brand.
In long run managers gain expertise in their field of operation. Similarly, some of the
marketing managers working over the years develop a feel for the market that
permits them to arrive at appropriate decisions. According to this approach the
organisations advertising spending depends on the judgment of experienced
managers.
Once the budget has been appropriated, the next step is to allocate it. The allocation
decision involves determining which markets, products and/or promotional elements
will receive which amounts of the funds appropriated. Allocation can be influenced
as follows:
4.0 CONCLUSION
Setting specific objectives should be an integral part of the planning process.
However, many companies either fail to use specific advertising objectives or set the
ones that are inadequate for guiding the development of the promotional plan or
measuring its effectiveness. Many companies fail to recognize the specific tasks that
advertising and other promotional mix variables must perform in preparing
customers to buy a particular product or service.
5.0 SUMMARY
We have considered the following in this unit:
37
• The DAGMAR approach to setting advertising objectives, pointing out that
the approach has had considerable influence on the advertising planning
process;
• Establishing advertising budget, and observed that there is no universally
accepted method of setting a budget figure;
• Approaches to develop advertising budget;
• Various factors that influence the allocation of advertising budget.
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
&
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
38
UNIT 2 – MANAGING THE CLIENT-AGENCY RELATIONSHIP
39
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In this unit, we shall discuss management of the client-agency relationship. Once the
client has selected the agency that is going to help the business to hitherto
undreamed-of heights, the two parties to the deal have to do two things. One is
relatively trivial in the greater scheme of things, though it may well carry the seeds
of future divorce: agreeing the commercial and financial terms of the relationship.
More important is the need to establish exactly how the relationship is going to work,
on a day-to-day basis. The quote above is not the only way to run the relationship,
though it is likely to be the most fruitful.
Exactly how this works will depend on the client company's attitude to its ad agency
or agencies. Most agencies are hoping to arrive at a relationship with their clients
where they become, in effect, business partners. Some clients, however, prefer to see
their agency as simply a supplier: just another business from whom they buy, with
the transactions concerned being tightly defined, and a subject for often aggressive
price negotiation.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
Both agency and client need to have a clear understanding on a whole range of issues
as the basis for a formal contract. Within this, the key areas are likely to be
remuneration, the handling of intellectual property, and—unfortunately—severance
arrangements. The contract should be an essential element confirming the
relationship. The contract is not usually of day-to-day importance in a successful
ongoing client–agency relationship—only when things start to go wrong (which, as
Murphy's Law states, they inevitably will).
From the agency's point of view, the vital issue is to be sure that they get paid,
adequately, for everything they do for the client. The client, naturally, wishes to get
as much as he can from the agency, while paying as little as possible. A good client
will realize that the best way to achieve this is not, in practice, to screw the agency
down and exploit every opportunity to get extra work beyond what is in the contract.
This means that the scope of the agency's responsibilities should be clearly spelled
out and agreed, and it should be recognized that the agency is entitled to ask for extra
money if it is asked to go significantly beyond the agreed tasks. (This should not
preclude the agency from taking a speculative initiative from time to time, but it
should not expect to get paid for that: it is a standard ploy in the continuing game of
seducing the client to give the agency more business.) In the last resort, both sides
need to recognize that the agency is in business to make a profit. If it cannot do that
on an account, it has to renegotiate the terms, or resign the account.
Commission
The main issue here is the rate of commission:
The alert client will be aware, too, that while media discounts are built into media
rate cards, studios and production houses often pay discounts to agencies, which can
make the production side of the business far more profitable to the agency than
appears on the surface.
The key problem with commission, though, is that it distorts—or can distort—an
agency's advice to its clients. There are clear benefits from persuading the client to
use media and creative material that entail limited work by the agency for large
expenditure, which is why large agencies have become rich on the back of TV
campaigns. You produce one expensive commercial (or group of commercials in a
campaign), on which you earn substantial production commissions, and then run , the
campaign for some time on national TV, the most expensive medium, without any
need to do more creative work. By contrast, a good press campaign requires far more
individual pieces of creative work for the same level of expenditure and is therefore
significantly less profitable to the agency.
Fees
Time-based fee systems look like the answer to the problem just described. In
essence, the agency is paid for the work it does on the client's behalf, and this should
mean that every option is given equal weight in the agency's recommendations.
Again, however, there are problems. First, the agency has to have in place an
effective and efficient time-sheet system as the basis for charging. Most agencies
have such systems, as part of their internal financial controls, but they are not always
the most religiously observed part of agency life. Then, the agency and the client
have to be prepared to agree on the rate for the time of each member of the team.
This may be easy enough, but it focuses the client's attention either on how costly it
is to have the services of the top people, or on the fact that he or she gets a nice
cheap deal, but never sees the top people who were promised, at the pitch, to be
working on the business. Finally, from the agency's point of view, the most costly
People are the creative talent, and the most valuable thing the agency can do for the
client is to produce a great creative idea. Great creative ideas may take many hours'
hard work, but are equally likely to emerge from 10 minutes' thought in the bath.
This does not give the agency much reward for the idea.
The main virtue of this approach is that it provides a transparent price structure,
lends itself to tight cost control by the client and meshes well with standard cost-
accounting processes. It also can be a valuable tool for the agency's management,
42
since devising the scheme requires detailed understanding of how the agency's
operating costs are structured, something many agencies are surprisingly vague about.
The obvious problem is that it treats the job of devising and producing a client's
communication campaign as a series of discrete elements, and fails to allow for the
possible existence, and value, of synergy between them. From the agency's point of
view, too, it lays them open to the client looking for competitive quotes, purely on a
price basis, which can quickly erode the scale of the business and the trust in the
relationship between agency and client. Finally, it needs some way of dealing with
quality: a cheap bad idea is no use to anyone, but how do you devise the necessary
system for rewarding great ideas? Unless you can do this, the agency has little
motivation to go the extra mile on your behalf.
Payment by results
Payment by results (PBR) systems are usually combined with one of the other
approaches, so that the agency can earn a bonus for exceeding agreed targets,
however these are set. Thus, Unilever's international agencies operate on commis-
sion, but can earn up to an extra 3-4% for above-target performance.
The obvious problem for both client and agency is to develop attainable targets and
measure progress towards them. The obvious way of setting targets is in relation to
sales, but there are considerable pitfalls in this, even for direct response operations.
As a result, many clients adopt a 'softer' approach, agreeing ratings for each aspect of
the agency's service, and rewarding attainment over a certain level. From the
agency's point of view, it is probably better to have a system that focuses more
closely on the attainment of agreed advertising objectives, expressed in the forth of
some type of communication measure. This will require the regular use of consumer
research to monitor progress against the benchmarks. The crucial issue is that both
client and agency have to be able to agree, fairly precisely, how they expect the
advertising to work and what to measure to see that it has done so. This can be
difficult to achieve.
Whatever system is used, there will need to be detailed arrangements to ensure that
43
non-standard items are adequately covered. Mostly these will occur in the area of
production and special events, such as sales conferences, in which the agency may
become involved. A particular issue that the clients need to be aware of is that TV
contractors expect to be paid in advance of the break of a campaign, and the agency
will expect to be paid accordingly; no agency can afford to be a banker for its clients.
This means that both teams have to get up and running very fast. They have to get to
know each other, and to establish day-to-day systems for contact and contact
reporting. These days, they will probably want to set up electronic links to exchange
information and data and to enable both sides to look at rough ads and other material
without incurring massive courier charges. A video-conferencing link, too, may be
needed.
At the same time, the agency team will want to learn everything they can about the
client's business and the brands being advertised. This should involve visits to offices
and factories, conversations with distributors or retailers selling the brand, a
complete review of all available market research and, of course, getting to know each
other's teams of people.
The most important immediate element to get into place, though, is the structure
and basis of day-to-day contacts. Who will talk to whom, and how often? What
arrangements should be made for reviews and evaluation? How should this all fit
into the client's business planning cycle?
Structuring contact
The primary contact between the agency and the client is the account manager
(account director, account executive or whatever). This manager is responsible for
the smooth running of the account and the effective use of the agency's resources on
the client's behalf. On a large account, or in a large agency, there will usually be two
or even three levels of account management: an account director (who is often on the
agency's board); a senior account executive or account manager (titles vary); and an
account executive, who is usually quite a junior assistant, who may be learning the
business.
On the client side, there will usually be a marketing director who is ultimately
responsible for the advertising, along with the rest of the marketing mix.
Increasingly, though, the chief executive takes an active interest in the advertising,
and will want to be involved in major discussions. Under the marketing director,
structures vary widely, and not simply with the size of the company. Some very large
companies have specialist advertising or communications directors or managers, and
perhaps also—again among the very largest—a specialist media manager. Most
44
companies have some sort of brand or market manager system, where one or more
layers of management take the responsibility for the marketing of specific brands or
product categories within the business. They will always be involved in the
preliminary stages of advertising development, but increasingly they are not in any
position to give the final sign-off to a campaign. This decision will be taken at a
higher level, and this means that brand managers can typically say 'no', but not 'yes',
to an idea. Increasingly, too, the purchasing department has a role in the client's
advertising management, particularly in the area of controlling production operations
and costs.
Most agencies aim for a structure where, for a particular client, the agency has one
contact person for each level of the client's business. Thus, the chairman or CEO
talks to the managing director; the account director to the marketing director; and so
on down the line. Obviously, this is purely formal and there is no reason, in
principle, why the links should not cross each other: in practice they do, frequently,
in most cases.
This is not least because most agencies these days like to have in-depth contacts with
their clients. The appropriate people at the client company are able to talk with-say-
the media planner, or the account planner, or the TV production department, without
always having to go through the account management team. The one possible
exception to this, which is very much a matter of agency style, is that access to the
creative department of the agency tends to be carefully protected.
There are two reasons for this. One is the practical one, that the creatives are
supposed to be busy creating, and do not want their train of thought broken by an
importunate client. The other is that creative people are widely—and sometimes
rightly—seen as 'loose cannon' within the agency, and liable to tell the client a few
unwelcome home truths that might do fatal damage to the relationship.
Where the exchanges at these meetings are not in writing, each meeting or contact
will be routinely (and briefly) reported, through what the business calls 'call reports',
or 'contact reports'. These are usually simply a note of decisions made and areas
discussed, not essays on the state of the world, and are circulated to everyone
involved with the account, on both sides. They provide a record of decisions and, in
some cases, a call to action by named individuals.
Major meetings
Day-to-day meetings between the key managers are not an adequate forum for
discussing major issues. These come in two main varieties: new briefs for major
45
campaigns, the presentation of new campaign proposals, research debriefs and so
on—what may be called 'operational' meetings—and 'review' meetings designed to
look at progress and results and to develop ideas for the future. Both categories
demand a significant level of preparation from the agency, and sometimes (especially
for new briefs) from the client as well.
SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
Discuss the methods of payment in the client agency relationship.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Playing on the fact that most people in the agency, not just the creative team, and,
indeed, on the client side are quite capable of being creative, they spend a day in a
team brainstorming session, focused on solving the communications problems for the
campaign.
5.0 SUMMARY
Let us summarize our thoughts in this unit as follows:
• Working with an agency should be a professional business relationship and
structured accordingly;
• This requires a formal contract, with especial attention paid to the thorny
question of how the agency will be remunerated for its efforts. The contract
should also cover a range of other details;
• The agency will aim to tailor its account team to fit with the client’s structure,
with the main contacts going through the account management team and the
client marketing department. This should not preclude direct contact between
the client and other departments of the agency;
• The relationship will – inevitably – revolve around a series of meetings,
which need to be a call reported to provide a record of the decisions taken.
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
46
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
Hall.
47
UNIT 3 – HOW ADVERTISING WORKS
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
It may seem somehow obvious that ads persuade people to buy things; and, indeed, it
is frequently claimed by people who want to control or suppress some form of
advertising that advertising 'forces people to buy things they don't want'.
Things are not as simple as this, and there is considerable argument about just what
ads can and cannot do, and how they do it. The fact that this argument exists is
important for anyone involved in advertising, because our assumptions affect our
48
expectations of what an ad campaign can achieve, and the way in which we set out to
measure the results (or to pre-test the ads, in order to try to establish that they will
work).
In practice, most people who work with advertising do not think very hard or often
about these questions. They carry built-in assumptions, based on their experience, or
on something they may have read or been told, and which direct their thinking in
ways which may not be inappropriate. It is assumed that ads can do, basically, one or
more of the following: create awareness of the brand, inform people about it,
encourage—or even persuade—them to try it and create some sort of emotional or
attitudinal bond between consumers and the brand that will lead to regular purchase
(brand loyalty). The ways in which ads can do this are seen through a variety of
different theories.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
Rational Emotional
Brand
We should recognize from the start that most advertising (with the possible exception
of some public service campaigns and the occasional generic campaign for a
commodity) is concerned with brands.
A brand is the way in which its owner sets out to identify and differentiate a product
or service from those of competitors. This is done both by exploiting the brand's
functional qualities (its taste, texture, efficiency, quality, etc.) and by endowing the
brand with an attractive set of emotional associations or 'values'. The combined
49
effect of this process is to make the brand more or less unique in its market, with
recognizable advantages over its competitors and a positive relationship with its
users. As a result, the brand can be maintained in its market, even if competitors
achieve functional parity and it may well be able to hold a price premium over the
market as a whole.
A brand is, in fact, a combination of what the brand owner has fed into it, through the
marketing mix, and how the consumer has perceived this, rationally, emotionally
and—above all—through experience of the brand. As Figure 3.1 suggests, all brands
have a balance of rational and emotional elements. These are built up by the brand
owner's various inputs, especially advertising and other communications (see Figure
3.2). When the brand touches the consumer, this input is processed—not always
exactly as the brand owner wishes—and the consumer's knowledge, attitudes and
experience combine with the rest to create the brand's real-world position (see Figure
3.3). (Note that the brand only really exists as a set of images and associations in the
minds of consumers.)
Rational
Emotional
Brand
Motivations
Associations
Information
awareness
R&D
M
Communications
NPD
A
50
Design
R
Production Positioning
K
E
Figure 3.2 The Marketing Input to the Brand
Experience
C Cognition Affect
N Rational
Emotional
S
U
Brand
Motivations
Associations
Information
awareness
R&D
M
Communications
NPD
A
Design
R
Production Positioning
K
51
think ads work, even today.
AIDA, and a member of more refined successors, is now really a museum piece. It
doesn’t fit the facts, in terms of what actually happens in the marketplace; it does not
fit what we know from psychology, which tells us that whatever happens in people’s
minds, it certainly does not follow the orderly sequence suggested; and it takes
absolutely no account of the fact that mot ads, most of the time, are seen by – and
indeed targeted at – people who have already bought the brand at least once.
Furthermore, it makes the fundamental assumption that ads do things to people.
SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
Explain the marketing input to the brand.
What this means, therefore, is that ads depend on what sticks in people's memories.
This raises further technical questions, because it is easy to assume that it is essential
that people should remember as much as possible of your ad. This is not, really, the
important thing (though it can be reassuring). What matters is that they remember
enough about your brand, so that when they are next in the market, your brand is the
one they choose. A lot of research about the effects of advertising has concentrated
on the recall of the advertisement: what it said about the brand, what the story was,
who the star actor in it was, the slogan at the end. While this can tell us something
about the memorability of the ad as such, it says little about its effect on the brand.
Indeed, Gordon Brown, founder of market research agency Millward Brown, which
is the world leader in advertising tracking research, concluded that the only
important measure of recall of the advertising was, quite simply, that it had been
advertised recently.
What is important is that consumers take out of the advertising enough memorable
associations with the brand, so that when faced by a brand choice in a store (or
wherever), they will tend to choose the advertised brand, because of its favourable
associations. In other words it is not what the advertiser puts into the ad that
ultimately matters: it is what the consumer takes out of the ad.
52
We can look at advertisements from the point of view of consumers to start to shed
further light on the whole process. What do people want from an ad—always
assuming that they are remotely interested?
Information
One of the key functions of advertising is to provide information (which includes, of
course, reasons for purchase—'persuasion'). In fact, for many years, this was the only
value that economists were prepared to attribute to ads, and this led, logically, to
calls from left-wing economists and politicians to restrain or tax advertising that was
not providing information in support of new products. This, of course, failed to
recognize the need for advertisers to keep competing, by reminding their customers
of products that they might already buy, in the face of the clamour for attention from
new competitors.
Consumers, certainly, look to ads for information, sometimes. In general terms, this
can be seen from the relative success of ads that offer what we now describe as 'new
news' about a brand. If you run an ad that tells people something new and relevant
about a brand, the ad will score well in various forms of research. More specifically,
there is a whole class of products, in particular durables and financial services, that
demand a great deal of understanding by consumers if they are to make a sensible
choice. These 'high information' products can be effectively advertised with
advertisements that carry a great deal of information: people in the market will make
the effort to attend to a commercial or to read a long-copy press ad.
The converse of the need for information for 'high-information' products is, of
course, that it will always be difficult to keep people's attention if you try to provide
a lot of information about a low-information brand or category. This is why most
fragrance ads, for example, carry almost no information. It can be argued, indeed,
that most perfume ads are quite simply saying 'Here I am', and that they are purely
announcements. A look at a variety of perfume ads would tend to confirm this, if we
want to take it literally. However, it is equally clear that most of them embody an
attitude or character which is inviting a specific type of consumer to identify
emotionally with the idea of the brand and, hence, to try it.
Entertainment
One of the most surprising research findings of recent years for much of the
advertising community was the discovery, in a 1991 project mounted by the US
Advertising Research Foundation, that the best research predictor available in pre-
testing of ads that were proven to be successful in the market was whether consumers
liked the ad or not. This was, in fact, a formal recognition of academic research
dating back some 10 years earlier, but it ran heavily counter to existing research
thinking.
Ad liking does not necessarily entail the ad being, literally, entertaining. This may
help, but if it is also irrelevant to the consumer, the ad will not be liked. Liking, in
fact, can result as easily from the provision of necessary information in an accessible
and helpful way as from a magical song-and-dance routine. A growing body of
research shows that ad liking can be successfully related to other measures of
advertising effects, such as recall and sales effectiveness.
Attention
There is rarely any very good reason for a consumer to pay any attention to an ad.
The only time that ads may be deliberately looked for is when a particular purchase
planned and the Consumer is actively seeking information. Then, ads may be seen as
one place to look, along with others. Other ads are typically only attended to if they
have something that actively attracts the consumer's attention. Even then, they may
well get a good deal less than full attention. This does not mean, however, that they
will have no effect. Modern analysis of the processes of attention and memory shows
that memory works by the stimulation of the neural networks in the brain, and each
time a stimulus activates the relevant set of neurons, the memory trace is
strengthened. This can happen virtually subconsciously: in fact, we operate like this
all the time in our daily life. No one sets out deliberately to learn the layout of their
living room, but it takes little use of it before we can walk through it in the dark
without bumping into anything or knocking things off tables.
This is, in fact, a learning process, but one which is unlike the active rehearsal that
goes into school learning. Nonetheless, as we see, over time, several ads for a brand,
and perhaps buy the brand to try it, this all strengthens the memory traces in the
brain, so that, when faced by an in-store display, we recognize the brand as familiar
and, perhaps, desirable.
From the advertiser's point of view, there is a massive and obvious temptation to do
everything possible to get noticed: to achieve what the business calls 'cut through'.
The reason is simple enough. We are exposed to a massive range of advertising
stimuli every day.
From what has gone before, there is clearly a conflict between this kind of attention-
seeking and the need for an ad to be likeable. Consumers like ads to be likeable: one
of the things they tend not to like about ads is when they force themselves upon their
54
attention.
Attitudes
It has long been believed that advertisements work, ultimately, by their effect on
people's attitudes. This is what persuasion is all about. So, we ought to be able to
measure changes in people's attitudes to our brand and its competitors, and use this
information to forecast changes in the relative market shares. Similarly, if we can
identify the key attitudes in our market, we can seek to strengthen our brand's
position in respect of these.
Unfortunately, this raises problems. First, there is now a lot of evidence that, in many
markets, changes in attitude—whatever they can be attributed to—follow purchasing
behaviour, rather than preceding it. It has pointed out that attitude differences
between brands among a population of all users of the category can be accounted for
almost completely by the relative market shares of the brands. (This argument looks
less good if the research is done so as to separate out users of each individual brand.)
Finally, it appears to be quite difficult to get attitudes, as measured by standard
research techniques, to change at all.
4.0 CONCLUSION
It seems reasonably clear that, whatever else advertising can or cannot do, successful
advertising does involve, at least over time, some form of shift or strengthening in
consumers' attitudes. The only problem is how to measure it both satisfactorily and
sensitively enough. We need to recognize, too, that attitudes interact with brand
experience as well as with brand advertising. Just because we have been advertising,
and an attitude changes, it is not necessarily safe to assume that the advertising is
responsible.
5.0 SUMMARY
• 'Persuasion' is a task for advertising. How could you decide whether or not an
ad is persuasive? What different meanings can you attach to the word in an
advertising context?
55
7.0 REFERENCES/FURTHER READINGS
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
&
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
56
UNIT 4 – PLANNING ADVERTISEMENTS: THE STRATEGY
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
3.3 What should the Target group get from our Ads?
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Advertisements do not usually spring fully-formed from the fertile brain cells of an
agency's resident creative genius. They are derived—often painfully and labor-
iously—from a careful process of strategic analysis. The client and agency team
work together to identify precisely what the advertising is intended to do, to what
target audience or audiences; what information it must convey; what emotional
57
values or associations..it needs to ally with the brand. Only when all this has been
done do the creatives get let loose on the project, and the strategy agreed between
agency and client provides the guidelines and the control mechanism for the
creatives' work.
As a client, you may be impatient to see ideas from the agency: that's what you hired
them for. As an agency, you may be anxious to develop ideas; particularly for a new
client and a new brand, you may be bursting with half-formed thoughts that look as if
they may turn into valuable, indeed sensational, ads. If you succumb to these
temptations, you are liable to be wasting your time. Unless you have a very good
idea of where you are trying to get to, you will find the whole process very
frustrating.
It's for precisely this reason that most large- or medium-sized agencies have a
planning department: in some agencies, especially smaller ones, the job of
developing strategies belongs to the account director. It should be recognized,
however, that planning is too important to be left to the planners: a good planner will
work with both agency and client teams as the strategy is formulated, and the fine-
tuning of the detailed creative brief may well be discussed with the creative team
before it reaches its final form. As ever, good ideas may come from anyone: the
number 3 on a player's shirt does not preclude the odd successful shot on goal.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
First, we need to distinguish between objectives and strategies, as these still seem to
be regularly confused in marketing documents. Objectives are, simply, targets: what
we wish to achieve. These may be set in terms of sales, market share, consumer
penetration (the proportion of the target audience buying a brand), brand awareness,
etc. The advertising objectives will be a subset of the overall marketing objectives
for the brand (see Figure 4.1).
58
Corporate business objectives
Advertising strategy
Marketing objectives
Marketing strategy
Communications objectives
Communications strategy
Advertising objectives
Advertising strategy
59
The development of the marketing strategy and the marketing objectives sets the
framework for developing the advertising strategy. Advertising strategy development
starts by identifying specific objectives that can be met by the advertising, and which
will enable advertising to fulfil its role in the overall marketing mix.
The planner's aim is to provide the answers to two deceptively simple questions:
To arrive at the answers, you have to go through a more or less logical process of
analysis, based on a combination of the advertiser's and the agency's knowledge of
60
the brand, market research and experience. Then, to turn the answers into a creative
brief that will genuinely inspire the creative team, there is a need for imagination and
creativity on the part of the strategists.
What the planner needs to know can be viewed as a cycle of information and
analysis. It is a cycle because marketing and advertising are continuous processes,
and the knowledge gained from one campaign can be built on as we develop the
next. The planning cycle is illustrated in Figure 4.2
THE MARKET
Where are we
Did we get
now?
there?
This version starts at the top with an examination of the marketplace, and the various
terms used in the figure cover the following areas:
The marketplace
The market in which our brand competes: trends in sales, market share, consumption,
distribution; the state of product development and innovation; patterns of
consumption—who are the heavy and light users of the category, and why? This
material can provide us with the basis for an understanding of how our brand stands
in the marketplace.
SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
Explain the SWOT analysis.
3.3 What should the Target group get from our Ads?
Every marketer's dream is the product that meets some fundamental human need,
perfectly, and does this in a way that no other product can match. In today's
competitive markets, very few—if any—products are like that, and, if they are, you
can bet that pretty soon someone will have either matched it at a lower price or
62
introduced something 'even' better.
This means that any brand you find yourself advertising is going to have to compete,
and compete against other brands that, by and large, deliver exactly the same benefits
to buyers, in much the same way, to much the same standard of quality.
As a result, advertiser and agency are going to have to work hard to sort out what has
to be said about the brand to ensure that enough consumers buy it, or go on buying it,
regularly. The object of the exercise has become to try to differentiate your brand
effectively from its almost identical competitors (think of Coke and Pepsi).
Deciding what should be said about the brand has to start from two related points:
4.0 CONCLUSION
A good brand positioning, which can be hard to develop, should be true to the brand
and its products, distinctive, relevant to consumers and competitive. A positioning is
a way of describing what is really important about the way in which the brand is
meant to fit into its market. It must, obviously, represent a truth about the brand, and
it must offer benefits to its potential buyers that are strong enough to make them
interested in buying. And it needs to be a means of differentiating the brand, in a
relevant way, from its key competitors.
5.0 SUMMARY
May we summarize as follows:
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
&
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
64
UNIT 5 – PLANNING ADVERTISEMENTS: CREATIVE BRIEFING
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
3.3 The Strategy: What would the Target group get from our Ads?
3.5 Briefing
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
65
7.0 References/Further Readings
1.0 INTRODUCTION
It is one thing to sort out the strategy. It is another to turn it into something that the
creative team will respond to with enthusiasm and imagination—and the better the
creative team, the more demanding they are likely to be. This unit suggests some of
the ways in which a creative brief can be designed both to meet the demands of the
strategy and to turn on the creatives.
It is important to recognize two things about creative briefs: first, that they are not
the same thing as briefing the creative team: it is no good distilling the strategy into
two carefully crafted pages of A4, and then throwing it to a 'team and telling them to
get on with it. We will come back to this. Secondly, there is undoubtedly room for
the creatives to contribute to the development of the brief: while they may want to
argue with the original version simply because something else appears, to be easier
to execute, they may
also have more positive contributions to make. The brief can often be sharpened
through a dialogue between the planner and the creatives.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
After a careful study of this unit, you should be able to:
• Describe some of the ways in which a creative brief can be designed both to
meet the demands of the strategy and to turn on the creatives.
Most of these forms follow pretty similar formats, though there are variations. In all
of them, however, there are three key elements that define the way in which the brief
will work: the description of the target audience and its relationship with the brand,
the 'proposition' and the supports for the proposition. Some would say that the tone
of voice of the communication is also a key ingredient (see Figure 6.1).
66
ads will work to achieve this? Who is the target audience? Why should people buy this
brand?
2. Who are we talking to? What are we advertising for?
All three briefing forms also include details of timings, media to be considered, etc.
The planner has to put into the brief enough information to define the audience, to
identify its existing relationship with the brand, and to bring it to life. So, a
marketing plan may talk about the target audience in almost purely demographic
terms: 'Younger families with children: XYZ housewives aged 25-40, especially
occasional users of Brand X'. But an advertising strategy and the brief that is based
on it will say something more like this (for a confectionery brand):
• Women, aged 25-40, who love—but may feel guilty about—eating chocolate.
A bit self-indulgent, and able to afford little luxuries. They enjoy most forms
of pampering.
• They are well aware of [our brand], but buy it (or several of the direct
competitors) infrequently, and for special occasions: they do not see it as a
day-to-day, casual eat.
• They think of the brand as special, and like eating it, but they don't know what
the product contains, and they rarely think about how nice it is.
• They see it as being a bit distant—aloof, stuck-up, probably foreign.
• They are reluctant to buy [our brand] for themselves, but they like being given
it.
This definition is, clearly, based on quite detailed research and specific decisions
about which people to target (most boxed chocolates have an older age profile than
that of the target), and the sort of things that the planner is hoping to achieve.
67
In a different sort of market—say cars—the target might be specifically defined in
terms of owners of particular competitive models that could be seen as susceptible to
switching makes at their next purchase. It would need, in addition, the sort of
psychological characteristics mostly used in the chocolate example, in order to show
how the target group look at cars and approach buying them.
More generally, it is quite important to be clear about what sort of relationship the
target consumers have with the brand to be advertised: are they very familiar with it?
Are they current light users, who we wish to encourage using our brand more often?
Are they lapsed users, who will, we hope, respond to news of a relaunch or
reformulation by trying the brand again? Are we hoping to attract people who have
never tried—or perhaps never heard of—our brand?
Why this matters should be fairly obvious: if we are trying to get new users, we are
going to have to work hard to attract their attention, and give them good reasons
(rational or emotional, or both) to try the brand. This may require a combination of
salience and persuasion—perhaps with a bit of involvement thrown in If, on the other
hand, we are aiming to make sure that our heaviest users keep taking the juice, what
is needed is going to be almost pure involvement, wrapped round a gentle reminder
of all the things that—we hope—make them love the brand.
3.3 The Strategy: What should the Target group get from our Ads?
As can be seen, the analysis to define the target group has gone into some detail
about who uses the product, how they use it, what they think of it, and so on. This
provides the basis for deciding what the advertising has to achieve. This starts from
studying the brand itself, in order to identify its strengths and weaknesses (SWOT
analysis).
The task of the advertising is likely to be to try to strengthen the brand's good points,
or to bring these points to the attention of a new audience. Equally, however, it may
be to try to redress a weakness. From the target audience description for our
chocolate brand, it is easy to deduce that whoever is doing the thinking about the
brand believes that it is too 'special' for its own good: the idea is to try to get people
to loosen up about it, to buy it and eat it for more casual occasions. To do this, it
looks as if the brand has, somehow, to become friendlier and more accessible.
Further, targeting it at a younger audience than the majority of regular eaters of
boxed chocolates suggests that someone has identified either a weakness in the
brand's user profile or the opportunity to influence a more susceptible and less
habituated group of women.
We are also beginning to get towards what we would like them to get out of our ads.
Why do I put it like this? Why not 'what we want to tell them about our brand'? The
answer goes back to what actually happens to ads when people see or hear them. Ads
68
are not something that people especially want to take any notice of. They intrude into
our lives, sometimes noisily and aggressively; they get in the way of what we are
reading; they interrupt our favourite TV programme. So we very often switch them
off altogether (mentally, or physically, by 'zapping' with the remote control on the
TV): we are very good at this. Or, when we do attend to an ad, our response to it is
filtered through a whole range of diversions and mental barriers. We very often only
take notice of part of an ad, and succeed in ignoring the key points that the advertiser
really wants to get across. It is rather as if people are involved in a game of 'Chinese
whispers' with the ads.
We also, very often, get far more out of the visual clues in the ad than the words,
because our eyes are quicker, usually, than our ears, and memory tends to be more
efficient at preserving visual stimuli than absorbing verbal material. So much so, that
research has shown that a radio commercial that picks up on key elements of the
sound track of a TV campaign can easily stimulate visual images from the TV
commercials—a process known as 'visual transfer' .
What this means is that we need to be very careful about how we think about the
communication process by which our ads will work. Communication is not a simple,
one-directional stimulus response process: between the sender and the desired
recipient of a message, there is a great deal of distortion and noise, rather like lots of
short-wave radio; and the recipient can decide—voluntarily or instinctively—to
accept only part of the message. Increasingly, too, people are coming to recognize
that communication should, ideally allow for the chance to reply: people like
dialogue. At its simplest, this means that ads with a response mechanism—a coupon,
and address to write to, a telephone number to call, a web site to visit—are often
more attractive than ads without.
3.5 Briefing
It is not enough for the planner to write the brief, get it signed off by the account
director and—probably—the creative director, and then drop it off on the desk of the
designated creative team. This is fine for a minor job within an on-going campaign,
though even then it is probably worth a few minutes' discussion.
For a major new campaign, more is needed. The creative team needs to emerge from
the briefing both knowledgeable and inspired with enthusiasm. This means that they
have both to become immersed in the brand and be given a direction and momentum
69
towards it. At some stage in the process, they need to go round the factory, visit the
shops or restaurants, apply for the bank account or the loan, fly the airline ... They
need to meet the people who make the products and run the business, the people who
have to handle the customers (and their complaints and queries) ... They should get a
chance to talk to consumers about the brand, or at least to be exposed to videos of
consumers describing their experiences. They will need to have available the fact
sheets, the brochures, the technical specifications.
Much of this is part of the pre-planning process, and it can produce the sort of
insights that can be crucial for the eventual campaign. As the team absorbs the brand
experience, the shape of the brief is being developed, and rough ideas are being
developed in (at least) the back of the team's minds.
This all becomes crystallized in the actual brief, and what is then needed is to create
an event that will reestablish the key points in everyone's minds before they go off
and start the hard work.
4.0 CONCLUSION
There are, obviously, an infinity of ways in which a briefing session can be made
into an event. Certainly, it will be helped by a bit of 'theatre'. This can involve simply
the use of the agency's presentation facilities to show video clips, display the
product, and so on; but it could involve a carefully structured visit to one of the
client's outlets or branches, or an 'away-day' in an unusual location.
5.0 SUMMARY
Take an advertising campaign you admire. Deconstruct it to arrive at the brief. Who
are the target audience? What are their attitudes to the brand? What is the
advertising trying to modify or strengthen in these attitudes? What is the
70
proposition? What evidence do we find in the ads to support the proposition? What
are the audience expected to do as a result of seeing the ad?
7.0 REFERENCES/FURTHER READINGS
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
&
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
Module 3
71
UNIT 1 – CREATING THE ADVERTS
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
There are a number of principles that can usually prevent the creation of positively
bad advertising, and a substantial number of guidelines that may help refine the
details of individual ads and enable them to work better. Since the world is full of
very ordinary advertising, this may help to reach at least a good average standard.
The problem is always to do better than that, and that is where creativity and
imagination, rather than any rules, have to dominate. This unit focuses on creating
the ads.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
Any ad needs to make it clear what is being advertised—the product category and,
72
most importantly, the brand. An important role for advertising is to enable the brand
to say ‘Look! Here I am’. It is possible, of course, to play a bit of a guessing game,
and this is quite common on TV, where brand names are often not revealed until the
end of the commercial
Research evidence quoted by Franzen suggests that suppressing the brand name can
be counter-productive: the-earlier the brand name appears in a commercial, the more
people will correctly make the link between ad and brand. You have to trade off this
fact against the possible benefits of giving viewers a 'reward', in terms either of
guessing the brand before it is revealed or of satisfying their curiosity towards the
end.
Similarly, in press ads, there is a well-known desire among agency art directors to
reduce the size of the client's logo or other branding devices, and a corresponding
requirement among clients to have it as large as possible. It seems reasonably
obvious that there is no point in being anonymous, though there may—just may—be
some point in playing a bit of a 'guess the brand' game in some circumstances.
This leads, frequently, to excess. Loud music, hectoring voices, the over-use of what
are believed to be key 'trigger' phrases: 'new', 'don't miss this', 'listen', 'free', `now'—
frantic speed of delivery of voice-overs, funny voices, press ads full of starbursts and
bold print, fast-cut TV commercials, flashing lights, the use of provocative headline
words ('sex', swear words), exploitative sexy pictures ..., and so on. The list is almost
endless, though disappointingly predictable.
Looking constructively at the problem, it is clear that the keys to effective attention
getting lie in a combination of the media context and the brand concerned. You stand
a better chance of getting attention in a medium if what you are saying stands out in
contrast to the programme or editorial in which it appears, or if it tunes in so closely
with its context that it becomes almost seamlessly part of that context, and the reader
or viewer is simply carried into the ad by the flow. Bearing in mind, too, that you are
often going to be among other ads, a distinctive tone of voice—quieter, perhaps—
may make the difference.
Then again, if the brand carries its own interest, because it has something new or
fascinating to say, this is a far better way of getting attention—in its own right—than
73
standing up and shouting. What's more, it has a better chance of working for the
brand than a 'bolt-on' attention-getting device that can actually divert attention from
the brand; you then get an ad that people notice, at least superficially, but no benefit
for the brand.
Likeability
American research in the late 1980s identified the likeability of an ad as a key factor
in its effectiveness. People respond better to ads they like.
Likeability is a complex concept: it does not simply mean that an ad should set out
to be humorous or to entertain. It means that the audience should feel that it is useful,
informative, helpful, pleasing, constructive—and, perhaps, entertaining and/ or
humorous.
As should be apparent, this tends to run counter to many of the ways in which ads
seek to attract attention, and emphasizes the problems associated with the more
obtrusive attention-getting devices, since these can induce irritation.
Simplicity
In general, people are not particularly interested in what ads have to say. This means
that ads have to have a straightforward, concentrated message, and to avoid
confusing this message with extraneous matter.
On the face of it, this is a recipe for very boring ads—which will fail on the grounds
of both attention getting and likeability—so it has to be recognized that simplicity on
its own is not enough. What it does mean, though, is that the number of points that an
ad tries to make has, in general, to be limited. This depends, ultimately, on the
medium used and the nature and purpose of the ad, but it is a reasonable
generalization that a single point made well and strongly will always be more
effective than several different points, almost however well they are put across.
Ideally, every ad should feature one key point, and this applies just as much to a
long-copy press ad for a financial service or selling a complex product off-the-page
as to a 30-second TV commercial or a poster. Posters, of course, are the ultimate
discipline, because the maximum number of words that you can hope to use
74
successfully is reckoned to be seven, and even fewer are better: quite simply, the
amount of time available for scanning a poster as you drive past it limits the number
of words you can take in.
Implicit in the importance of novelty for getting and retaining attention is the need
for originality. Ads that work tend to contain original ideas. The use of the word
'idea' here is important: it is not especially difficult to present a brand in a way that is
novel—more or less. It is a lot more difficult to present it through the medium of an
original idea, that says something new and interesting to the target audience and
wraps it effectively around the brand.
One of the great—and true—advertising clichés is 'Sell the sizzle, not the steak'. In
other words, make people salivate by offering them the rewards (or the anticipation)
of the product, not the product itself. This heightens the desire for the product.
Mostly the benefits you offer should be those conferred by the product: the results
people can expect to obtain by buying or using it.
There is a need to be a careful with humour. Obviously, there are some product
categories where humour is clearly inappropriate, if not actually in bad taste (which
may be seen as a recommendation for it in some circles!). Equally, humour can get in
the way of an advertising message, unless the proposition and the brand are very
carefully integrated into the joke. Finally, of course, you come up against the
ultimate problem of all humour.
4.0 CONCLUSION
5.0 SUMMARY
75
- Correspondingly, the ‘rules’ that exist for helping create ads are, at best,
guides to possible formats, suggestions as to how to organize the ad, lists of
elements that should be included.
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
&
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
76
3.0 Main Content
3.1 Is it a good ad? Why? Why not?
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
6.0 Tutor-Marked Assignment
7.0 References/Further Readings
1.0 INTRODUCTION
If you manage a substantial brand, and the agency is developing a new campaign,
you want to be reassured, before spending perhaps several million pounds behind the
ads, that what you are doing will work. Moreover, your senior management will take
a dim view of a campaign that invests large sums and then bombs. So, you will want
reassurance, preferably from consumer research, that what the agency is
recommending is right. What's more, because you are probably a numbers person,
and your management, especially the finance director who has to sign off your
budget, certainly are, you would prefer this evidence quantified. Indeed, since a new
commercial may cost millions to produce, and a series of them a good deal more, it
would be nice to have this evidence before the investment in production takes place.
Even if you have not taken this precaution, you will certainly want evidence from the
marketplace that the campaign, once running, is meeting its objectives—and, ideally,
you would like early warning of success or, more vitally, failure.
We are, then, talking about two things: in the jargon, 'pre-testing' and 'post-testing'.
As we shall see, post-testing now includes a variety of complex and sophisticated
considerations, while pre-testing raises a number of difficult issue.
First, though, it is worth thinking about how you should set about judging an ad.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
77
- Highlight the considerations in Pre-testing and Creative Development
Research;
- Discuss the factor in Post-Testing and Campaign Evaluation.
If you are involved with advertising, you will find yourself, all the time, looking at
ads and asking yourself these questions. When you are the client, or the agency
account director, faced by the creatives' latest gem, it is your job to do the same
thing. How should you go about it?
• Is the ad on strategy?
• Is there a real idea here?
• Is it fresh and/or original?
There is, also, a fourth, which inevitably intrudes. It should, ideally, be ignored, but
rarely is:
• Do I like it?
Is it on strategy?
Assuming the strategy is clear, it should not be too difficult to answer this. You do
have to remember, though, and it can be difficult, that the ad is usually designed to
appeal to someone very different from yourself. You need to remember, too, that it is
what people get out of the ad that matters—and that this will depend as much on the
way it is said as on what is said. Further, a fact about the brand does not have to be
spelled out if it is abundantly apparent from the visual—and vice versa.
How do you recognize an idea, or at least a relevant one? Arguably, it has two key
features: it is at least slightly unexpected; and it works indirectly, through metaphor
or simile or analogy, as well as directly. And, if it is any good, it is absolutely
appropriate to, and tied in with, the brand. An idea enhances and expands the brand:
it goes beyond the mere words in the strategy, and adds something to them.
Do I like it?
The most difficult decision you will ever take is the one that says 'I hate it: but if you
tell me it is right for the market, I'll run it'. Unless you are slap in the middle of the
target group for your campaign, it really doesn't matter whether you like it, or not. It
does matter whether they do: as we have seen, likeability is a key characteristic of
successful ads. But remember, you will have to defend the ads to your colleagues: so
be prepared!
Few people, however, are prepared to rely solely on their own judgement where
large sums of money are concerned. Corporate cultures are all against it. So what can
you do to use research to guide and confirm your decisions?
Pre-testing
In spite of this, many research agencies operate pre-testing systems that involve
recruiting an audience to watch, in a typical example, a film show in a theatre. Into
this a commercial or a series of commercials is inserted, much as in a TV
commercial break. Before the show, they are asked a number of questions, more or
less carefully masked, about the product category concerned in the test, and these
questions include a form of brand choice designed to discover their preferences
among the main brands, in the category. After the film show, further questions are
asked, which show how imported attitudes to the various brands may have changed
after exposure to the commercial and, in particular, whether the brand choice has
moved in favour of the advertised brand.
Obviously, the first essential use of research for creative development is to ensure
that the strategy is developing on the right lines. At a very early stage in the creative
process, it makes sense to talk to real consumers about how certain ideas and ways of
looking at the brand grab them—or fail to. A variety of very rough stimulus
material—scrap art, snatches of music, rough drawings, tentative headlines or
endlines for ads—can be used in qualitative research to confirm hunches about what
may make a campaign work. Indeed, you can formalize even this stage of the
exercise and carry out quantified research to rank in order of apparent attractiveness
79
a range of appeals, concepts, product features, possible celebrity endorsers for the
brand, and so on, though this will usually be more appropriate later in the process.
The aim of this sort of research is essentially 'creative': it is there to rule out obvious
dead ends, but it is also intended to encourage new hypotheses and directions. It
should, as far as possible, involve the creative teams directly, because contact with
the target audience will improve their understanding of the task and the restrictions
that people's sophistication and knowledge (or lack of them) may impose. On the
basis of the research, the planner and the creatives can improve the brief and even the
underlying strategy, and build a more rounded picture of where the brand can go, and
how to steer it there.
The next stage is to develop ideas for advertisements. These will be debated within
the account group and, ideally, with the client. Although some agency creative
directors prefer not to show the client anything until there is a fully-fledged
recommendation on the table, I believe that the process works best when the client is
involved in creative development from quite an early stage. For this to happen,
however, there has to be a high level of confidence in the relationship, on both sides.
Then, there is room for a further round of research. Again, this will usually be
qualitative, and designed to find out primarily how well the ad ideas are commu-
nicating to the target group. Do they understand, quickly and easily, what it's all
about? Are they interested? What personality for the brand is projected by the ads?
Are there specific elements in any of the ads that seem to be especially intriguing/
exciting/confusing/ new/strange, etc.? Does what is being put in front of them fit
their idea of the brand or at least come close enough to be a realistic point to aim for?
Do any ideas really grab them? Again, the aim should be to increase our—and
particularly the creatives' - understanding. To help find out which words, which
images, which thoughts carry resonance with the target audience, and can be used to
build the brand. Finally, we have the finished product—or, perhaps, a couple of
alternatives.
There are many ways to assess the success of an advertising campaign. All of them
require at least some market research, and some are complex and expensive.
There are basically two ways of going about this. Traditionally, advertisers used to
carry out an appropriate consumer survey before launching a new campaign, and
then repeated the process, either at the end of the campaign or, if they were rich
enough, at intervals throughout it. The latter makes most sense, because it avoids the
possible problem of measuring what appears to be success, but is actually an
incipient decline.
4.0 CONCLUSION
5.0 SUMMARY
81
attributed to the campaign and/or provide clues for future development. This
research is best done more or less continuously.
You are responsible for advertising a new brand of ready meals. What market and
research information would you hope to have in place to measure the success of the
campaign? Realistically, how long do you think it would be before you could judge
success or failure? Why? 'What factors are likely to affect this?
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
&
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
82
UNIT 3 – THE MEDIA
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 OBJECTIVES
- Define media;
- List and explain the various terminologies in media;
- Enumerate and explain the available choices of media.
The word media comes from the Latin word “middle”. Media carry messages to or
from a targeted audience and can add meaning to these messages. The following
terminologies can be found in media:
83
Media Planning - Media Planning is the process of designing a strategic course of
action that shows how advertising space and time can be used to present the message
in order to achieve the advertisers’ goal.
Media Objectives - Media objectives are goals to be attained by the media strategy
and program.
Media - The various category of delivery systems including broadcast and print
media.
Media Vehicle - The Specific Message Carrier, it can be a specific Television Show,
or a Specific News Paper.
Coverage - Refers to the potential audience that might receive the message through
the media vehicle.
Reach - Reach refers to the number of people that will be exposed to a media vehicle
at least once during a given period of time.
There are two types of media for communication - mass media and interpersonal
media. Interpersonal media is an expensive medium but highly useful for focused
84
reach. On the other hand mass media like television, or radio, or newspaper are cost
efficient and characterised by wide reach. Now, let's examine the characteristics of
each of the mass medium.
1. Television
Following are the specific characteristics of television:
Television Characteristics
Advantages Disadvantages
2. Radio
Following are the specific characteristics of radio:
Radio Characteristics
Advantages Disadvantages
3. Newspaper
85
• Newspaper is a better option to provide detailed information,
• A publication have different editions for different areas, so there is a
geographic flexibility in newspaper,
• Newspaper have different sections, so there is opportunity of targeting special
interest groups,
• Newspapers are vehicle for coupon delivery.
Newspaper Characteristics
Advantages Disadvantages
4. Magazine
Following are the specific characteristics of magazine:
• There are magazines for sports, corporate, business, women. children, etc., so
we can say magazines have specific audience selectivity, as they are
specialised,
• Magazines have longer life,
• Magazines provide them opportunity for message scrutiny, and geographic
and demographic flexibility.
Magazines Characteristics
Advantages Disadvantages
5. Outdoor
Following are specific characteristics of outdoor media:
Outdoor Characteristics
Advantages Disadvantages
4.0 CONCLUSION
Media planning and buying are becoming ever more sophisticated, in the face of
burgeoning volumes of research data about an increasingly extensive and fragmented
range of media. What's more, there is a growing business for specialist media
auditors—companies who advise advertisers on the quality and efficiency of their
media planning and buying.
5.0 SUMMARY
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
87
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
&
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
88
UNIT 4 – RESPONSE AND INTERACTIVE ADVERTISING
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
3.4 Telemarketing
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Direct response advertising has long been a core element within advertising as a
whole, and many serious theories about advertising in the 1920s and 1930s were
based on direct response: Claude Hopkins, who wrote Scientific Advertising in 1924,
derived his thinking from selling by mail order to the rural mid-West. This is the
focus of this unit that will consider direct response advertising in conventional
media, and going on to look briefly at the mail, telemarketing and the Internet and
webvertising.
89
2.0 OBJECTIVES
At the end of this unit, you should be able to:
In the 1990s, the growing power of computer databases has provided the
technological infrastructure to enable advertisers to approach direct marketing with
potentially far greater precision. At the same time, thinking about customer
relationships, and the value to a business of its existing customers, has led to the
development of a whole industry of 'relationship marketing' (or the new acronym
CRM—customer relationship management. This movement is predicated on the
Pareto principle: that approximately 80 per cent of your business (or profits, or
whatever) will be generated by 20 per cent of your customers. Calculations originally
by Bain & Co., widely banded about by the marketing press, suggest that it costs 5 to
10 times as much to get a new customer as to keep one, and that businesses should
therefore concentrate efforts on the retention of their customers.
The way to do this is through 'one-to-one' marketing, which is where direct response,
direct mail, the Internet and the interactive opportunities of digital TV come together.
The key to success in customer retention lies in developing and maintaining a
dialogue with the customer, and tailoring this dialogue, through the knowledge that is
gathered into the data warehouse, to create, as far as possible, a genuinely one-to-one
relationship with each individual.
Direct response and direct marketing, both through media advertising and the mail,
the telephone and the Internet, is a massive growth sector of the advertising business,
and worth a book on its own. The UK Direct Marketing Association (DMA)
produces an annual 'Census' of direct marketing activity, which claims a total
expenditure on all forms and aspects of direct marketing in 1997 of over £7 billion,
compared with total advertising expenditure of some £12 billion. That is for ‘over
there’!
Direct response advertisers use ads almost purely for recruitment of new customers,
and then maintain contact with them by letter or telephone. Even where substantial
volumes of business are done 'off the page', this is only the start of a relationship, at
least for the more sophisticated operators.
Media selection can be, and is, done on the basis of systematic testing, though
experience can be valuable: among national newspapers. Newspapers will normally
work faster, and generate more responses, than magazines—even though the latter
offer more precise targeting and less wastage. As ever, the media equations require
balancing of costs, volumes, timing and the value of the responses obtained: in the
last resort, what matters to the direct response advertiser is making a sale—an
enquiry that remains unconverted is not good enough.
Apart from your own customers, lists can be purchased from a variety of sources,
collectively described as 'list brokers', which may include other commercial
organizations (and you can rent your list to others, so long as you have obtained
permission to do so when you collected respondent's details). In theory, at least, you
can buy lists of people or companies against very detailed specifications, in terms of
their demographics, their interests and at least some of their buying behaviour.
Once you have attracted a customer, of course, your direct mail need not always be
selling anything—at least not too openly. If you have an established customer
relationship (something that the customer is, of course, the best judge of) you may be
providing information, thanking him or her for their business, or whatever. You
should not, of course, miss the opportunity to use a contact to try to sell, but it can be
done discreetly, through an offer of information on a new product, or an invitation to
ask about some new topic.
91
3.4 Telemarketing
Direct response is, of course, interactive. But doing it electronically, via Teletext, a
TV screen or the computer, has hi-jacked the name. Teletext, by now, is becoming
outdated, and is not very flexibly interactive, but it has acquired, in the UK at least, a
substantial role in one or two markets, notably travel.
The exciting new frontier, however, is interactive digital TV and the Internet, which
are rapidly converging, and causing headaches for marketers and advertising
agencies alike. At present, there are few, if any valid, business models of how to
manage these channels in consumer markets, although `e-commerce' has become a
reality for some business purposes, and there are IT marketers, such as Dell
computers, who do most of their business in this way.
To advertise interactively on the net, you have, first, to establish a web site, to which
your ads can be linked. You then have to buy space—'banner' ads, page
sponsorships, etc.—on suitable sites that can provide you with traffic that may click
on your link and visit your site. You then have to provide the visitors to your site
with enough excitement, stimulation, information and motivation for them to place
an order—and you need to give them the reassurance that you can be relied on to
deliver and that the transaction is secure enough to avoid their credit card being
hijacked.
This means that your site has to be well designed—not just pretty, but functional,
too. There is nothing a web surfer hates more than hanging around while an elaborate
set of graphics slowly loads itself on to the screen. Also, if your site is good, popular,
and attracts a lot of traffic, you have to be prepared to alter it—or at least parts of
it—quite frequently, so that regular users' interest remains stimulated. The same
applies to web ads, too. The life of a single creative for a banner is reputedly no more
than a week or so, in most cases. The great thing, though, is that you can get systems
that will measure the response to both the ads and the individual pages of your site,
92
so that you can tell which ones are getting a good response and when it is starting to
wear out.
4.0 CONCLUSION
5.0 SUMMARY
A marketing strategy that relies solely on direct marketing may be unable to maintain
a company's customer franchise. Why should this be so? And what should the
company do about it?
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
New
93
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
&
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
94
UNIT 5 – PLANNING THE CAMPAIGN
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Most advertising campaigns are planned over a year. This is simply because most
companies' operations are usually planned on this time-scale. The fact remains that
95
although the half-life of a burst of advertising is unlikely to exceed three or four
months, we will usually hope that our activities have an effect beyond the confines of
a year. This is, in essence, what the whole concept of brand building, and its
measurement by brand evaluation or brand equity, is all about.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
Out of the answers to these questions—which will have informed the entire strategy
for the brand in ways discussed in earlier chapters, based on the way consumers buy
in our market and the factors that are known to influence them—it becomes possible
to start to plan the campaign.
In addition, the manager planning the campaign will have to take due note of the lead
times involved both in booking the advertising time or space and in producing the
ads to fill it. At the same time, too, the whole plan needs to be closely coordinated
with other functions within the organization—especially sales (the goods have to be
in the right shops at the right time, or the training programme for the telesales
operation put in place); production (who will need to know what they have to
produce, when, and where it needs to be sent to); and finance (who will want to
manage cash flows, quite apart from hoping to have your budgets justified in
advance).
97
though, PR can work with the advertising--and, indeed, sometimes feed off it.
And then there's always the company web site—if you know how to manage it
properly—though for most brands the potential coverage of the target audience is,
and will remain for some time, rather limited.
Finally, if you have the right sort of brand, you are likely to have, or be developing, a
customer or potential customer database, which can be used for direct marketing.
Further, there is growing evidence, from the work of the magazine publishers, that a
combination of TV and magazines is likely to be more effective than TV alone; and
the same appears to be true of TV and radio in combination. Similarly, we know that
people use the ads in different media in rather different ways, taking from TV the
more emotional brand values, or simply a desire to know more, but using press ads,
or direct mail or leaflets, to gather more detailed information.
The chances are that any campaign will be aiming to achieve a combination of brand
awareness, brand understanding and knowledge, and the development of more or less
emotional brand values. The balance between the media used should depend on the
priorities between these types of objectives. A typical example is the way in which
car manufacturers generally use TV, or perhaps posters, to create awareness and a
desire for a model; but use press ads (plus direct mail and point-of-sale material) to
provide more detailed information about the car's specification and features, and to
set up the basis of a deal.
98
3.4 Small Budgets in Practice
Possible solutions to the problems posed by smaller budgets can be illustrated by two
examples. The first is a financial product. Here, the brand is just one of many
products marketed by a leading institution, so it may benefit from other parts of the
company's substantial ad budget; but the product has to compete within its own
market, and attract customers off the page—to telephone the company for more
information and, perhaps, to buy over the phone.
4.0 CONCLUSION
There are some proven solutions to the problems a small budget raises. Mostly these
revolve around targeting: the more precisely you can identify your target audience,
the easier it is to find one or more media that reach it effectively.
5.0 SUMMARY
99
Discuss the considerations for planning a big budget campaign in the context of
advertising.
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition.
New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A
Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge
&
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
100
Module 4
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
3.0 Main Content
3.1 The Advertising Practitioners Council of Nigeria
(APCON): History and Its
Operations
3.2 Control Functions of APCON
3.3 Other Laws Controlling Advertising in Nigeria
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
6.0 Tutor-Marked Assignment
101
7.0 References/Further Reading
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This unit focuses on the history of APCON, its organisational structure regulatory
and control functions, as well as areas where APCON needs more regulatory
work.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
We have noted in one of the earlier units that the main regulator of advertising
practice in Nigeria is the Advertising Practitioners Council of Nigeria (APCON).
It is the body established by the Federal Government to regulate advertising
activities through APCON Decree 55 of 1988 and the subsequent amendments:
Decree 93 of 1992 and Decree 116 of 1993. The adoption in January 1988 by the
National Council of Ministers of a broad National Mass Communication Policy
was an important milestone in the birth of the Advertising Practitioners Council
of Nigeria. Various discussions were said to have led to the articulation of t h e
relevance of a d v e r t i s i n g in the nation’s social, political and economic
activities as well as the need for recognition and regulation. The Advertising
Practitioner Council of Nigeria (APCON), established by Act 55 of 1988, was a
logical outcome of the legislative recognition to advertising as a profession in
Nigeria.
Functions of APCON
Section One Act 55 of 1988, which set up APCON, states its functions
as:
Membership
• Fellow
• Full Member
• Associate Member
• Student Member
Registration as an Ad Practitioner
Associate Member
Anyone above the age of 21, who possesses any of the degrees or
diplomas listed under the student category, and is employed in a
recognised organisation where he or she can acquire professional
experience. He or she must be of good character and must not have been
convicted in Nigeria or elsewhere of a criminal offence.
Full Member
Anyone, who has met the requirements for associate membership and in addition
has been in continuous advertising practice for a minimum of five years.
Fellow
To be a fellow, the applicant must have fulfilled the conditions for associate and
full membership. In addition, he or she must have been in continuous active
advertising practice in the 15 years preceding the date of his or her application, and
must show evidence of significant contributions to the practice of advertising.
Student Member
Anyone who satisfied the Council that he or she is undergoing a course of studies
recognised by the Council and leading to the award of:
103
• APCON Diploma/Professional Certificate
• CAM or BEEC Diploma in Advertising
• Degree/HND in Marketing, Mass Communication, Graphic Arts
or Advertising
• NIJ PGD Advertising
a) APCON
b) Workforce
c) Individual practitioner
d) Organised practice
e) Corporate practice
f) Organised sectoral groupings: ADVAN, AAPN, OAAN, NPAN,
BON
In this regard, the Council appoints other bodies to support the secretariat
in executing the provisions of the law. These bodies are:
a) Investigating Panel: this body hears complaints from and
against advertising practitioners and stakeholders in the industry.
b) The Advertising Practitioners Disciplinary Committee: this body
is charged with adjudicating in these cases.
c) The Advertising Standards Panel – this ensures that practitioners
maintain standards set in the industry.
106
However, issues continued to be raised by advertising practitioners
where they think APCON needs to do more work. Some of these are:
i. they believe that direct media buying and selling, which involves
placement of advertisements by an advertiser without the knowledge
of the practitioners, is against the APCON law and therefore
unhealthy for the advertising industry
ii. they believe that the entry into the profession is loose as many
unregistered people still engage in the business of advertising in the
country. They say this is also against the spirit and tenets of the
APCON law
iii. members of the public have continued to raise issues about
the need to strengthen the effectiveness of the APCON laws
regarding deceptive advertisements
iv. in addition, issues of compliance with the advertising
code of ethics are raised against APCON too as we shall see
in subsequent units.
SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
Which areas of advertising would you give APCON credit and where does
it need to do more work?
• Food and Drug Decree of 1974: this law prohibits sale of certain
category of food and drugs, and or of such food and drugs
because they are considered to be either unsafe or their are
misleading the public. For example, you are not allowed to advertise a
drug, which claims to cure obesity in Nigeria. Unfortunately, this is
now flouted with impunity in Nigeria and APCON and some of
the regulatory bodies concerned have proved incapable of dealing
with these infractions.
• Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON)
• National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA)
• National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control
(NAFDAC), 1993
• Nigerian Communication Commission (NCC)
107
• Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
• Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences
Commission (ICPC).
• Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA)
• National Lottery Regulatory Commission
• The Counterfeit and Fake Drugs Decree No 21 of 1988
• The Food and Drugs Act Cap 150 of 1990
• The Poison and Pharmacy Act Cap 366 of 1990
• Consumer Protection Council (CPC), a parastatal of the Federal
Government established by Act No. 66 of 1992 established to promote
and protect consumers’ interests in all areas of products and services,
provide speedy redress to their complaints, inform, educate and
empower them (consumers) to act as discerning and discriminating
consumers in the market place. There is also the Consumers
Association of Nigeria and other such groups, which we shall deal
with under consumerism.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Since 1988 when APCON came into being, advertising in Nigeria cannot be said to
be without laws and regulations. The APCON law has provided the structure for
operations and growth of the industry in Nigeria. There are of course, many areas in
the advertising industry in the country that needs improvement and more work,
especially the areas of direct media selling and buying and proper registration of
members to weed out non-professionals. In addition, APCON needs more work in the
area of regulating messages of advertisements to guide against deception, negative
advertisements, misleading claims of products and other marketing abuses. It is hoped
that the seeming protective cover of the practitioners against detection, report and
prosecution of deceptive advertisements would be fought by the rising consumerism
flavour in the country.
5.0 SUMMARY
This unit has looked at the statutory regulation of advertising in Nigeria. In this regard,
we have examined the composition of APCON, the structure of advertisements industry,
control and functions of APCON in Nigeria. We have also identified the main areas
where APCON needs to do more regulatory work. In the same vein, we have
identified some other laws and organisations set up by the Federal Government
to regulate the relation between producers, advertising agencies, marketers and the
consumers in the country.
108
6.0 TUTOR-MARKED ASSIGNMENT
Discuss the composition of APCON and its control functions in regulating advertising in
the country.
109
UNIT 2 – ADVERTISING AND SOCIETY
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Advertising is blamed for many of the ills of society. Significantly, the word used when a
politician—or a judge, a social worker, a clergyman, a pressure group or even the person
next door—accuses advertising of some heinous crime against humanity is virtually
always 'advertising'. Advertising clearly sets out to encourage 'consumerism' (a word that
used to mean concern for consumers, but suddenly changed meaning, and, as such,
exploits the gullibility of people who cannot afford the goodies portrayed in the ads.
Undoubtedly, there are real criticisms that can be levelled at advertisements, and
possibly at the industry that produces them as well. Most of these criticisms are in fact
more criticisms of the market economy and its workings than specifically of advertising,
though they recognize advertising as its most obvious commercial face. There are a
number of areas where society can reasonably attack advertisements and advertising—
110
and plenty more where someone may find cause to complain about an individual ad.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The Codes of Practice are especially stringent in the attempt to control and regulate the
content of advertising to children.
There are four related issues involved here. First, are children capable of recognizing that
ads are ads, and understanding that the aim is to sell them something? Second, should we,
in any event, regard them as a legitimate target for advertising? Third, because the way in
which most advertising to children has to work is through 'pester power', is it right that
advertisers should be encouraging children to put pressure on their parents in this way?
Fourth, specific to nutrition, is the argument that the concentration of food advertising on
'junk' food (of a variety of kinds, according to current theories, or who is doing the
complaining) leads to the development of a whole range of ailments.
Children do, in fact, learn to recognize ads as ads from quite an early age. Research
by both commercial and academic researchers shows that they are well aware, as
young as four or five, of what an ad is, and what it is trying to do. (This is younger than
classical child development theory, exemplified by Piaget, would suggest, but the
evidence seems clear). The Code of Practice aims to control the effects of advertising by
(for example) ensuring that ads make clear to children the size and capabilities of, in
particular, fantasy toys.
111
The broader issue is the one of involvement in the market, and how this affects parents. I
do not see how children can avoid the market. It therefore makes sense that they should
learn how to deal with it. This will (inevitably) mean that they meet with
disappointments, when they have believed too much of the (inevitable) hype. You can
argue that they should not have to cope with this until they reach a certain age--but what
age makes sense? Eight? Ten? Fifteen? Some people already remain incurably naïve until
they reach their dotage. It seems to me that—almost—the earlier you learn not to believe
everything you hear in the ads (just as you should learn not to believe everything you
read in the papers or see on TV) the better.
This is an area where the Code of Practice and the self-regulatory system, together with a
growing body of law, have the effect of making it very difficult to use advertising to
promote anything harmful. Except, of course, that smoking and alcohol are both addictive
and at times antisocial; and driving fast cars, to take the other main area, is potentially
antisocial and dangerous. (Illegal drugs, by contrast, are not advertised, but there is
frequent—sometimes justified—criticism of individual ads for using the language of the
drug culture. It is extremely difficult for those not in this culture to prevent this
happening: most people over about 30, even in ad agencies, find themselves in much the
same position as the much-criticized judges.
More generally, the very extensive literature on the relationship between advertising
and smoking is distinctly inconclusive as to whether ad bans lead to a reduction in
smoking, or the presence of advertising creates extra volume demand. The manufacturers
argue that the advertising is solely about brand competition; their critics vociferously
disagree.
Alcohol is a more complex issue, because it is quite possible for children from quite a
young age to see ads that sell the brands and the habit of drinking in a reasonably
appealing way. Again, however, it is by no means clear that it is advertising that starts
people drinking: parental example—and, indeed, encouragement—seems the most potent
factor, followed, again, by peer encouragement. Certainly, it is easy for a young person to
use ads as a means of finding a repertoire of drinks to explore.
112
3.3 Dishonesty, Misleading, Cheating
Ads put the best face of the product forward, and may well conveniently forget to point
out the disadvantages. This is a recognized part of the way the game is played.
Interestingly, however, there is a growing trend towards greater frankness, which has
arisen alongside the apparently growing interest among consumers in the companies they
deal with. If there is pressure on companies to be, and to be seen to be, ethical,
environmentally concerned, and so on, there is definite pressure on their brands and their
advertising to conform to the same sorts of standards. There is probably a great future for
campaigns that acknowledge (small) weaknesses, at the same time as boosting the brand's
advantages.
The ad business has a quite incestuous relationship with the arts. Many people who work
in the arts have worked—or even do work—in advertising, and advertising uses the arts
all the time. The relationship is complex, and complicated by the fact that every now and
then people in advertising act as if their latest ads actually are works of art. In fact, the
only advertising form that seems to have got recognition as art is the poster, though there
are those that claim some TV commercials to be works of art.
Of course, too, ads damage the environment. Think how much prettier our townscapes
would be without all those posters, shop signs, street furniture. Think of all the paper
wasted on printing all these ads that encourage us to consume, to deplete the earth's
resources, to deposit rubbish (most of it packaging, which is also advertising) and further
pollute the environment we live in.
Ads encourage wasteful and excessive consumption. They promote the idea that all
that matters is to own things and consume things. They persuade people to buy things
they cannot afford—or else rub the noses of the poor in the fact that these desirables are
out of reach.
113
and, of course, that's simply awful. If there was less advertising, or even if it was more
responsible, standards and values would be higher.
4.0 CONCLUSION
No one is perfect, and it would be mad to suggest that all ads are socially
responsible and dedicated to the furtherance of humanity. It is considerably less
easy to accept any of the blanket condemnations of advertising, at least without agreeing
that the capitalist market economy in which we mostly live and work is
fundamentally immoral and damaging. This may be true, but raises a different agenda.)
What is unhelpful and misleading is to blame advertising for all the faults both of the
market and of society, without recognizing that it is merely an element in that system,
and not necessarily the source of the problems under consideration. In particular, it is
very easy to attribute to advertising powers that it does not possess. If it did, everyone in
the business would be mightily richer!
5.0 SUMMARY
You work for a snack food manufacturer. A food lobby has accused your company of
promoting bad diet by advertising, intensively, products that are full of empty calories
and excessive fat. Draft a reply.
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
114
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition. New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge &
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
Wood, Marian B. (2007). Essential Guide to Marketing Planning. London: Prentice Hall.
115
UNIT 3 – GLOBALIZATION AND ADVERTISING
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A number of factors encourage the concept of global advertising campaigns. In this unit,
we shall look at the concepts of globalization and advertising, and consider a compromise
between ‘global’ and ‘local’ in advertising.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
116
3.0 MAIN CONTENT
3.1 Globalization
The formalized concept of globalization of markets and commerce has been around for
over 25 years, and the idea of global advertising is nearly as old. If firms can produce
products to a uniform specification for the world's markets, why should they not have
global brands under which to sell them, and back these with global advertising?
Production facilities have begun to migrate around the world, seeking suitable low-cost
locations, and companies have grown ever larger, through internal expansion and through
mergers and acquisitions. At the same time, as we have seen, media companies have
begun to develop worldwide coverage, and even to sell space and time on an international
basis.
The WPP Group's 1997 Annual Report carries an interesting brief analysis of the parallel
processes of agency mergers and the consolidation of very large multinational advertising
accounts into a small number of agencies on a worldwide basis. While 23 of the top 30
US agencies are now owned by just nine multinational groups, major multinational client
companies such as Colgate, IBM, S C Johnson, Reckitt 8c Colman and Citibank have
reduced their roster of agencies from as many as 40 or more to just one or two. This
means that the big global networks have an overwhelming advantage over even the best
local agencies in trying to win business from most major multinational clients. The fact
that a major world brand such as Coca-Cola could suddenly start to buy advertisement
ideas from a creative 'boutique' organization that was not even really in the business of
producing advertising shows how potentially fluid the situation is.
The rationale for consolidating international business into just one or two agencies is
largely one of management efficiencies: shorter chains of command and simpler co-
ordination of activities, leading—hopefully—to reduced costs. These latter can certainly
accrue from a reduction in the amount of management time that needs to be devoted to
dealing with the agency, and may include a reduction in the amount that the agency or
agencies is or are paid. At the same time, too, centralized negotiation, whether through
the creative agency operating as a full-service agency, or through a multinational media
specialist agency, could lead to reduced total media costs. In practice, it is worth noting
that at least some financial arrangements reported (by agencies) appear to give the agency
117
more than the traditional 15 per cent commission (or its equivalent in fees), rather than
any reduction.
Of course, this is naïve. The ad will have to be translated and the verbal part of the
soundtrack rerecorded, at the very least—but this need not be very costly, except where
the commercial's dialogue has been produced in lip-sync, where dubbing may be
unacceptable in some key markets, such as the UK. We are still going to be well ahead—
just so long as the ad works as well in every other country as in the one for which it was
originally produced.
What's more, the process will be making the maximum use of the most difficult bit of
advertising development: having a great creative idea—always assuming that we have
one. Great ideas, the argument goes, are too valuable to be wasted on a single market or
group of markets: it would be sheer dereliction of duty on the part of the advertiser's
management if they failed to use the idea in as many markets as possible. At least one
major global marketer, Unilever, has a policy of taking excellent, successful advertising
concepts, wherever they have been developed, and applying them elsewhere to whichever
of their many brands seems appropriate. Because of the company's history, its brands
tend not to be global, but their ad concepts sometimes are. By contrast, another
multinational, Mars, has spent the last few years globalizing long-established brands, so
that the UK has seen Marathon become Snickers, and Treets become M&Ms, for
example, as part of this harmonization.
The big question, assuming we have a great idea—and the ability to recognize it as
such—is whether it is realistic to expect it to work equally well all over the world; or,
failing that, what we will have to do to adapt the idea to enable it to do so.
Again, there is a naïve assumption, most frequently, but by no means exclusively, found
among senior managers of US multinationals, that what works there will work anywhere
else. After all, the US is a very large and quite diverse set of markets, so a successful ad
there has to have a degree of acceptability among people of widely differing backgrounds
and, even, languages.
There are a number of reasons why this assumption is naïve—even though it is not
necessarily wrong. These can be divided into two broad categories: country-specific and
118
market-specific.
Market-specific reasons for questioning the assumption derive primarily from the
standing of the brand in different countries. Very few brands are equally strong or equally
well developed in terms of their product life cycles, in more than a few 'of the countries
in which they are sold. A brand may be a long-established market leader in the US; a
well-known second or third brand in some other English-speaking countries such as the
UK and Australia; a struggling newcomer in (say) France and Germany; and a luxury
brand for the very rich in most of the South. In each of these markets or groups of
markets, it may be faced by a different group of competitors (which will, to be sure,
consistently include some well-known multinationals), and these, again, will occupy
different positions within the market. A well-known example of the sort of differences
that arise in this way is Levi's: in the US, Levi's jeans are mass-market and price-
competitive; but in much of Europe, Levi's is a premium-priced, high-quality brand.
A further complication may be the way in which the product or product category is used
or consumed in the various countries: Kelloggs have had a long uphill struggle to develop
a market for breakfast cereals in Continental Europe, where some of their products have
found a completely unexpected (to an American or Briton) niche in the snack market.
Clearly, where a brand's position can be so radically different from country to country,
and if the optimum advertising strategy should be derived from a detailed analysis of the
brand's specific position in its market, it is logically improbable that the same advertising
could fit every country equally well, simply on the grounds of the brand's competitive
situation.
Then there are country-specific factors. These interact with the market factors, but are
primarily concerned with the nature of the society in the individual country, the values of
that society, and characteristics of the culture that may involve body language, frames of
reference, sense of humour, taboos, religion, and so on. It is quite easy to construct a case
that makes it very difficult to believe that an ad that works excellently in one country
could ever work as well in another. A most convincingly argued example of this is that
any 'global' advertising campaign must be quite radically adapted to local needs if it is to
stand a chance of success.
That there are national styles of advertising is undoubtedly true, as anyone who goes to
any of the growing number of international advertising awards festivals would readily
acknowledge. What is more, these styles seem to emerge most strongly in the best work
from each country, which suggests that they are reflecting the reality of the national
cultural character.
119
interests that transcend national boundaries and that, therefore, it is right to target them
with international advertising campaigns. The two groups that have traditionally been
cited in this way are businesspeople and teenagers. Businesspeople, it is claimed, are now
so used to travelling across national boundaries and ; interacting with other nationalities
that they may be regarded in a way as international hybrids; while teenagers, as is well
known, listen to the same music, wear the same (grungy) uniform, eat the same fast food
and are, therefore, simply a global tribe. To these two groups can be added the growing
'Internet Community', which is assumed to have completely globalized instincts and
interests—in the apparently total absence of any evidence.
One final argument that is sometimes used to support the concept of the global campaign
is that with tourism rapidly becoming the world's number one industry, it would be
immensely confusing to people if they travelled to another country and saw their familiar
brands advertised in a totally different way. Quite apart from the fact that the numbers of
people involved are still small when viewed against the total populations of either the
hosts' or visitors' countries, there are two highly questionable assumptions built into this
argument. First, that the tourist will be remotely in a frame of mind in which ads are
relevant; and, second, that he or she can understand an ad in a foreign language.
Overall, then, the message from research seems to be that it is difficult, if not impossible,
to run an absolutely homogeneous campaign across national borders, unless the countries
concerned have a lot in common. You have to adapt: you have to take account of local
idioms, metaphors, body language, and sense of humour. You have to recognize national
styles. In a word, the ideal multinational campaign is not 'global', but `glocal': it embodies
the widely quoted view that you should think global, but act local.
The fact remains that there are successful multinational—or even global—campaigns.
Marlboro and Coca-Cola, to take two prime examples, have successfully sold what is, in
effect, an American dream to the world for years. Esso's (Exxon's) tiger is pretty much
global. Even, slightly surprisingly, British Airways' arrogant and improbable
repositioning of itself as the World's Favourite Airline worked, with remarkably little
120
variation, more or less all over the world.
4.0 CONCLUSION
This careful tailoring and adaptation of core campaign concepts to be the inevitable way
forward for most global brands' advertising, if they are to reap the full benefits of their
creative ideas. In some cases, it may be impossible even to do this type of adaptation in
an individual market, and a specific campaign will be required.
The ideal remains the purely local campaign, because this will be created and fine-tuned
to its direct market, with all the style, humour, panache or whatever that is relevant to the
local market situation. The one problem this inevitably raises is that it is unlikely that an
advertiser can call on comparable levels of creativity and production excellence in all
markets, and that the costs of production will be disproportionately high. If the results can
be good enough, this would not be a problem: the best ads can be shown to outsell even
average ads by so wide a margin that they can justify the expense.
So, the final message has to be one of compromise. Get a really good campaign—from
somewhere—and adapt it as carefully and imaginatively as possible to local market
conditions. And be prepared to reject it in one or two markets if all the evidence is that it
really will not do the business.
5.0 SUMMARY
What categories of product would you most expect to be able to advertise with
multinational ads? Why?
121
7.0 REFERENCES/FURTHER READINGS
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition. New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge &
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
Wood, Marian B. (2007). Essential Guide to Marketing Planning. London: Prentice Hall.
122
UNIT 4 – THE FUTURE OF ADVERTISING
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
3.2 Unbundling
3.4 Technology
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
We live in a time of rapid change, and that this is not merely a source of stress for anyone
in business but an opportunity for management. This unit looks at some of the key themes
for the future that will affect advertising and the context in which it is created and
managed. Furthermore, the Nigerian situation will be presented.
123
o The development of consumer-centred marketing, based on interactive and one-to-
one responsive communication, sales and delivery systems.
o The growing importance to management of (rapid) evaluation of all of a firm's
commercial activities.
o The continuing development of technologies that affect the creation, production
and distribution of advertising messages.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
3.1 Globalization
The last unit took a hard look at the way in which advertising can be effectively global,
and outlined the pressures behind globalization. It has been estimated that the top 1000
advertisers account for 90 per cent of the world's ad expenditures. Assuming that this is
remotely true, one possible implication is that there is room for no more than 40-odd
global agencies, each handling, on average, 25 of these advertising giants. The vision in
Pohl and Kornbluth's sci-fi classic The Space Merchants, of just two vast advertising
mega-agencies effectively controlling the world, appears to be almost conceivable--
especially since it seems reasonably certain that at least 10 per cent of the top 1000
advertisers will merge with, or acquire, one of the others in the next couple of years.
The question is then what good does this sort of giantism do? For whom? And, for an
advertising text, does it help produce good, or excellent, advertising? It seems to me that
this process of corporate aggrandisement runs counter to most other trends within the
advertising business and—more significantly—within society as a whole. Huge
organizations progressively lose contact with their customers, and become entirely reliant
on bureaucratic system-building and system maintenance. This removes the possibility of
any creative response to changing circumstances, and encourages a paralysis of the status
quo.
This progressive giantism offers numerous opportunities for the smaller, swifter, more
agile operator to start to pick off the juicy bits around the edges. Large businesses neglect
their smaller, outlying operations, and this applies both to advertisers and their agencies.
For many years now, the leading Italian ad agency has been the local Armando Testa—
124
the only non-multinational in the top 20 agencies in Italy. They have attained and held
this position by being good at being Italian: something that none of their competitors is
any longer able to do so well. As their founder says, this process has been helped by the
agency's refusal to go public, which has relieved it of the need to damage the structure of
the business in the search for ways to boost profits for the shareholders.
The problem for the smaller operator remains that it is difficult to penetrate the
businesses of the large multinationals. Multinational executives find it a source of
comfort that their agency has offices in outlying parts of the world—there is almost a
process of ticking off the flags on the map, and no one got fired for buying IBM. The
fact remains that it is perfectly possible for any agency to place advertising in a country
where it has no office of its own, and perfectly possible for an advertiser to buy
advertising from a creative source that has no agency network and to use this all over the
world.
Agency commentators—mostly from the large groups—have for long observed that it is
very difficult to be a medium-sized agency in most developed markets. In practice, most
such agencies get taken over by larger groups, and this leaves a fertile source of material
for smaller agencies to feed on. Meanwhile, there is an observable ebb and flow in large
corporations' relationships with agencies: consolidation and concentration tend to be
followed by a period in which local (especially) reins are loosened, and smaller firms are
allowed to get a bite at the peripheral and minor brands where the pressures for
conformity and the safe solution are fewer, and the opportunity to do something
spectacular greatly enhanced.
If to this is added the current fashion in corporate management for 'focus', which means,
in effect discarding brands, divisions and whole markets that no longer fit the vision of
the company's expertise and future, and there are lots of quite rich pickings for the less
gigantic agency to feed off. This will continue, in one form or another.
3.2 Unbundling
Creative and media started to separate as long ago as the end of the 1960s in the UK, and
the process is far advanced in most major advertising markets. It has proved less easy to
hive off the creative function from the main agency that remained, and most of the
creative boutiques seem to have transformed themselves into something else, while it is
now more common to find freelance creative teams operating on a small scale. Yet Coca-
Cola was able to reinvent the concept by going to CAA, which was, in effect, a talent
agency.
More recently, the UK's planning initiative has begun to develop `splittise tendencies,
with a variety of planning consultancies and individual consultants providing services
that compete with, or complement, those of the agencies. These strategists do not have
the monopoly of thinking about brand strategy, however: there is a new breed of brand
125
strategy consultants, and the marketing divisions of the big management consultancy
companies are also starting to intrude in this area—to the disquiet of some agency
managements, who recognize that the consultants have access to higher levels of clients'
management, and therefore pose a threat to the agency's assumed leadership in brand
thinking.
By now, in fact, you can buy almost any advertising agency function from a
specialist organization or consultant—there are even account managers who will
run an account for a period if an agency is for some reason short of people to handle it.
However, the fact that it is possible to do this does not necessarily make it the right thing
to do. While it is tempting to think that, as an advertiser, you should buy the best
expertise available to perform every process involved, there is no guarantee that the
experts you assemble will be able to work together as a team, especially as a creative
team and creativity is, above all, what advertisers seek from their agencies, and the point
where the agencies' advantage over management consultants identifiably lies. Certainly,
what this 'cherry-picking' will achieve—unless you buy the services of an account
manager to organize the whole process—is an enormous increase in the detailed
workload that you have to undertake.
There is, however, a more fundamental problem with unbundling, and this lies in the way
in which advertisers are, increasingly, looking at their communications.
Further, as the media available become more fragmented and complex, and the possible
ways of using them move from straightforward ads to a variety of forms of sponsorship,
product placement, editorial and advertorial messages, and so on, the need to approach all
of these options with both understanding and imagination begins to demand new ways of
thinking about both the media and the creative material that should go into them.
If all these elements are being assembled from a range of different and specialist agencies
and organizations, the task of coordinating and orchestrating the diverse contributions
rapidly becomes awesomely complicated and extremely difficult—both because of the
technical requirements of the different activities and because of the politics of the various
parties involved.
It can be argued, too, that because the ways in which media can be used are proliferating,
126
the primary communications planning decisions should now be about the media, and that
media thinking should precede any creative planning this would turn traditional practice
on its head, though the more enlightened agencies have long tried to keep media thinking
at least in parallel with creative.
The logic of this is that unbundling media from the creative agency is strategic mistake,
however enticing it may be in terms of apparent economics. Either you have to create a
new breed of media planner, separate from the media buying agency, and closely linked
to the creative agency; or you have to reintegrate media with creative into a new type of
full-service agency. Media agencies have already recognized part of this, by force of
financial pressures: by the time they had turned buying successfully into a commodity
business, they desperately needed to find ways of adding value to their operations, by
developing more sophisticated planning systems and approaches.
What is very clear is that any large and forward-thinking advertiser will be looking to
manage its use of media and of the types of communication it puts through each medium
in a much more sophisticated, coherent and synergistic way than in the past. For large
users of media advertising, in particular, this requires something of a sea-change in
thinking, and a reappraisal of their whole marketing communications function.
3.4 Technology
Technology has permeated the advertising world since the invention of the
printing press. It affects the availability and nature of media; the ways in
which we can create and produce ads; the ways in which we communicate our plans and
strategies to colleagues and clients or agencies; the ways in which we conduct research
into the media, into our ads, into our customers. It has created a whole new range of
media opportunities, through the Internet, digital TV, interactive point-of-sale material of
all kinds, the new plasma video screens appearing in shopping centres, and so on. Even
printing has gone digital, so that in theory one could, for example, tailor a customer
magazine to a single customer.
The technological revolution has had its most obvious impact on advertising in three
areas: in media research, where modern computers make it possible to analyse vast tracts
of data almost in real time; in production, especially for TV, where post-production
wizardry has almost no bounds; and in the understanding of consumer information that
underpins modern direct marketing
Agencies have so far tended to be erratic and cautious in their acceptance of most forms
of new technology. Few have gone far in investing on their own behalf, and they have
preferred to use specialized suppliers to provide the specific services that they have
wished to adopt. There are exceptions to this, and I think that the next few years will see
the larger agencies embarking on a quite massive move into owning, as opposed to
merely renting, a variety of technologies. In particular, it seems very clear that the life of
127
so-called 'new media' agencies as a specialist group is going to be relatively short-lived:
the good ones will be bought by established ad agencies, and the poor ones will die.
Similarly, as production facilities become more computerized, the existing tendency for
large agencies to acquire their own will gather momentum.
Quite simply, if the agencies do not become wired, to a high degree of sophistication,
they will find themselves losing business. This will come to apply, too, to more mundane
facilities such as video-conferencing: for international business, this is becoming an
essential tool in most large client organizations and, although agencies tend to hate it,
they will have to learn to live with it.
Government has already reconstituted the board of APCON as well as appointing new
interim chairman. Hopefully, the new board will steer the course of the body in the
interest of all stakeholders in the industry and for the rapid development of the Nigerian
advertising market.
The good thing with globalization is that it brings with it world- recognized parameters to
bear on a local industry. Our local industry still needs the creativity, capital, and
managerial know how of the big global advertising companies.
As the global marketing communication industry adopt the latest cutting edge technology
in order to make it operations more efficient and satisfy the changing taste of consumers
worldwide, Nigerian chapter is bound to follow suit spending billions of Naira in the
years to come in the purchase of some of the best technology in the market money can
buy. Already new satellite TVs are coming on stream together with new TV and radio
stations. The increasing adaptation of the internet as a means of advertising has awoken
the Nigerian advert industry on the need to quickly catch up with the global practice.
Already numerous Nigerian corporate agencies are now allocating part of their annual
advert budget on internet sites such as Yahoo, Face book, Google, LinkedIn, and others.
The target is to reach the largest target audience possible at the most efficient cost
possible.
128
As the economy continues to grow, major companies’ efforts to boost their image
through branding increase. Already major brands in the country such as Dangote, First
Bank, MTN, Glo, BUA, and GTBank have been spending billions of Naira in order to
increase the strength of their brand. Despite all these, the Nigerian advertising industry is
still at developing stage, as it will take years before it will reach the level of maturity we
are seeing in advanced markets such US, France and Japan. The total annual advert
budget for the whole economy combine is still meager compared to South Africa.
In terms of creative content in our advertising, we still lag behind what is found in the
Arab world, whose creative content does not even reach the level found in advanced
countries. The Nigerian market is still being dominated by some few big local advert
agencies (with monopolistic tendencies) who do not like new entrance into the business
whether they are local or international; thus, for the interest of development of the
industry there is need for fair play, healthy competition and effective regulations.
4.0 CONCLUSION
5.0 SUMMARY
• Globalization will continue to affect the advertising business, the clients it serves,
and the media it uses. This appears to run counter to the growing expectation of
sophisticated consumers that they will get individual attention from companies.
• The traditional full-service agency has been progressively ‘unbundled’ as
functions have been spun off: this runs counter to the growing pressures for
integrated marketing communications, and raises the question of who is going to
do all this integration.
• Customer-centred, one-to-one marketing is a strong trend, which threatens media
advertising budgets, but also calls in question most of the effects of globalization.
A role for media advertising will remain, but it may be substantially smaller,
within overall marketing budgets, than today.
• Firms are increasingly expecting to measure the value of marketing inputs. This
puts heavy pressure on advertising, as opposed to some other marketing
communications disciplines, to improve measurement techniques.
• The entire advertising industry is being changed and moulded by technology, to a
greater extent than ever before. This is affecting, and will continue to affect, the
129
production of ads, and is changing the balance of the media used for advertising.
It also has a significant impact on the way in which agency businesses can be
organized and managed, especially on an international scale.
You have been asked by the management of large international agency to design an
agency for the future. List the key features of your recommendations. Assume that you
have total freedom to exploit new technology and new thinking about people in
organizations.
Doyle, Peter (2002). Marketing Management & Strategy, 3rd Edition. Essex: Pearson
Educational Limited.
Ferrell, D. C. & Hartline, Michael D. (2005). Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition. Ohio:
Thomson South-Western.
Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin Lane (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Edition. New
Perreault, William D., Jr. & McCarthy, Jerome E. (2005). Basic Marketing: A Global-
Peter, J. Paul & Donnelly, James H., Jr. (2011). Marketing Management: Knowledge &
Westwood, John (1996). The Marketing Plan: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd Edition.
Wood, Marian B. (2007). Essential Guide to Marketing Planning. London: Prentice Hall.
130