Scribd
Upload
65 views1 page

Learning Resource Error Review

The document outlines a process for evaluating a DepEd-developed learning resource by identifying errors in content, language, and format. Evaluators are to provide specific recommendations for each error and determine an overall rating based on the number of errors found. Final recommendations include options for minor revisions, major revisions, or field validation, with a certification of the report required from the evaluators.

Uploaded by

Irene Parpan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
65 views1 page

Learning Resource Error Review

The document outlines a process for evaluating a DepEd-developed learning resource by identifying errors in content, language, and format. Evaluators are to provide specific recommendations for each error and determine an overall rating based on the number of errors found. Final recommendations include options for minor revisions, major revisions, or field validation, with a certification of the report required from the evaluators.

Uploaded by

Irene Parpan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

for the DepEd-developed Learning Resource

Title: ______________________________________________________________________________
Learning Area: _____________________________________ Grade Level: _________
Type of LR: ________________________
Carefully read the learning resource page by page, checking for any error present in
the material. For each error found, write the page number and paragraph or line
number where it was seen is the 1st column. Write a brief description and classify the
type of error (e.g., content, language, and format) found in the 2nd and 3rd column.
Provide specific recommendation for improving the identified error in the 4th column.
After all errors have been encoded, determine the total number of errors found. Give
an overall rating based on the number of errors found and the final recommendation
of the material.
Paragraph / Line / Brief description Specific
Page number (in of Errors/ Type of Error recommendations
chronological Findings/ for improving the
order) Observations identified error

Legend: Type of Error: (C for content, L for language, LF for Layout & Format)
Final Recommendation: (Please put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate box.)
Minor revision. This material is found compliant to all criteria. However,
minimal revision is recommended following the summary of findings and LR
with marginal notes.
Major revision. This material is non-compliant to any of the criteria thus, major
revision is recommended following the summary of findings and LR with
marginal notes.

For field validation. This material is found compliant to all criteria with NO
corrections.
(Please sign below and at the back of each previous page.)

I / We certify that this summary report and recommendation(s) are my / our


own and have been made without any undue influence from others.

Evaluators(s): __________________________ ______________________________


Signature(s): __________________________ ______________________________
Date accomplished: ___________________________

You might also like