Peformance evaluation - Detailed
Evaluated person
ID: 499LGL534774
First name: AWANDIL
Last namel KOKOI.ADZE
Date of blrth! 16/02/1998
Nationality: Georgia
Position: 3rd Officer
Evaluation details
Evaluation form: PPRO for OOW, revision 3
Evaluator name: Vikas KATNORIA
Evaluator position: Master
Evaluation period: 1610e12022* zgloLlzoz3
Evaluation date: 29loLl2023
Evaluated at installation! KHASAB SiIver
PPRO vercionl 4
Comments: Evaluator signing off
- Company policy
1 2 3 4 5
of company pollcy?
x
to practical work onboard?
x
Ability to deal with shore personnel?
x
Understanding of properry presenting vesser and crew during shore side
vetting
initiative - Involvment - Teamwork
Personal involvement in seeking practical solutions?
Personal involvement in safety for vessel, cargo and personnel?
Personal involvement in
Personal involvement in follow-up of tasks and plans?
1 - Poor Performance 2 - To be 3- Satlsfactory 4- Oubtanding 5-
initiative - Attitude Generat Conduct
to admit mistakes and adjust own behaviour?
and willingness to discuss affecting his work?
Page I
Pedormance evaluation - Detailed
Attitude/initiative - Reliability toyalty 1 2 3 4 !;
General impression of trustworthiness?
x
General impression of loyalty?
x
Total: 0o/o 0o/o 0o/o 1000/o 0(,/o
1-PoorPefformance 2-Tobeimproved 3-satisfactory 4-outstanding 5-Exceptional
Leadership abilities - General leadership 1 2 3 4 I;
Ability to make decisions?
x
General conducting during situations of conflicts?
X
Ability to get the best out of the crew?
x
Ability to organize and plan team efforts?
X
Ability to delegate tasks to personnel that will improve their qualifications?
x
Performance during stress and dangerous situations?
x
Tota!: 0o/o 0o/o 33o/o 660/o 0o/o
1-PoorPerformance 2-Tobeimproved 3-satisfactory 4-outstanding 5-Exceptional
Leadership abilities - Follow-up Achievement
1 2 3 4 E
Ability to give understandable instructions?
X
Ability to understand given instructions?
X
Ability to control that instructed work is performed satisfactorily?
x
Ability to be consistent in instructions and dealing with crew?
x
Strives to obtain results within given time frames?
x
Total: 0o/o Oo/o 60o/o 40o/o 0%
LEquErstrtP aastatues - AuEnoflEy
I 2 3 4 5
authority?
X
while dealing with subordinates?
x
Respected by subordinates?
X
in job performance?
X
to personnel of other cultural
X
Leadership abilities - Cooperation
Works closely with current shlp leadershlp team?
Creates good working relations?
Shows responsibility for crew welfare and recreation?
Particlpatlon in social activities onboard?
Page 2
Pefformance evaluation - Detailed
Leadership abilities - Delegation 1 2 3 4 5
Ability to delegate?
x
Introduce cadets in officer functions?
x
Totalr 0o/o 0o/o 50o/o 500/o 0o/o
1-PoorPerformance 2-Tobeimproved 3-satisfactory 4-outstandlng 5-Exceptional
Administrative skills - planning 2
1 3 4 5
Organizing own work?
X
l-PoorPerformance 2 hnding s_Exceptional
Administrative skills - Communication
1 2 3 4 5
Follow-up on regulatory rules (USCG, IMO, etc.)?
x
Follow-up on Company policies and instructions?
X
Total: 0o/o 0o/o 0o/o 1000/o 0o/o
1-PoorPerformance 2-Tobeimproved 3-Satisfactory 4-outstanding 5-Exceptional
skills - Own work 2
1 3 4 5
Jrganrzeo/oroer tn general?
x
English?
x
,vnEen Engltsn I
x
Total: 0o/o 0o/o 0o/o 100o/o 0o/o
1-PoorPerformance 2-Tobeimproved 3-satisfactory 4-outstandlng 5-Exceptional
Professional skills -
team management
Ship handling
Use of navigational equipment
1-PoorPerformance 2'Tobeimproved 3-satisfactory +-ortstanoing
5-Exceptionar
Professiona! skills - Cargo
Stability calculations?
Loading, readlness and
Change between dry and liquid cargoes?
Page 3
Pedormance evaluation - Detailed
Professional skills - Operation/Maintenance Job Knowtedge 1 2 3 4 !;
0perations plannlng/instructions?
X
lvlaintenance Systems for vessel and equipment?
X
l-PoorPerformance 2 tandlng s_Excepgonal
Professiona! skills - Job pedormance
1 2 3 4 E
Ability to solve problems without input from others?
X
Ability and engagement in solving new or changed work tasks/areas or responsibilities?
x
Computer knowledge?
x
Understanding and use of drawings and instruction manuals?
Jnuersranotn9 or tecnntcal equtpment?
trmergency proceoures/
E _= l I
x
X
X
Total:
1- Performance 2 -To be improved 3 -satisfactory 4 - outstandinE
Oo/o I _*_) 0o/o B3o/o t6tYo
Poor
I 5-t:xceptiO
uevetopment paft 1
Yes Nr
Lomperency ror ntgner rank held?
X
rrqrrug raour^ rEqurrernen(s ror ntgner ranK as per company GMS is met?
x
r.ry cxPenel nlgner ranKr
X
x
and Career Development part 2
Certificate of Competency for higher rank held - Supporting Comments
3rd Officer holding 2nd Mate certificate of competency.
Training Matrix requlremenb for higher rank as per company GMS is
met - Supporting comments
All certificates are valid for higher rank.
experienced for higher rank - Supporting Commenb
3rd officer having 9 months experience as 3rd officer. First ship
with oSMC.
Demonstratedcapabilityforhigherrank-supportingcomments1In.t,ain@
3rd officer has shown keen rnterest in rearning 2nd mate
Jobs, high potentiar officer.
Hg is aware of comoanv's bridoe nrncprtlra
--o.,,or
Overall promotion_grading,
I' High Potentlal offlcer - ready for promotion in all iespects (completed his Rank step/competency
Management System)
ofFrcer holds higher rank CoC but requires more experience,
training and/or skills before being
. officer has potential for promotion to next rank, but does not
hord coc for higher rank
. No promotion potential shown during peri ld of ihis review
Page 4
Pedormance evaluation - Detailed
Comments on Performance
Comments:
Seafarer comments:-
Wl\ t4usley
Comments On Performance
3rd officer Avtandil Kokoladze is smart, sincere, reliable officer. H^e
is always completing assigned jobs in given time frame.
He is a high potential officer, have taken keen iriter"iiin learning
2no mate,lobs. He is gbod trainer and perfect team member.
Overall shown excellent oerformance-
.jr...........K14F..4.8..9i|y.er........................... ...
Printed at installation ..... .......?pl.9.l.l492j.
Date
Page 5
